Volcanoes of Kamchatka

Country
Russian Federation
Inscribed in
1996
Criteria
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "significant concern" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
This is one of the most outstanding volcanic regions in the world, with a high density of active volcanoes, a variety of types, and a wide range of related features. The six sites included in the serial designation group together the majority of volcanic features of the Kamchatka peninsula. The interplay of active volcanoes and glaciers forms a dynamic landscape of great beauty. The sites contain great species diversity, including the world's largest known variety of salmonoid fish and exceptional concentrations of sea otter, brown bear and Stellar's sea eagle.
© UNESCO

Summary
2020 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
20 Jan 2021
Significant concern
Current state and trend of VALUES
High Concern
Trend
Stable
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Finalised on
20 Jan 2021
Description of values
Volcanoes and associated volcanic features
Criterion
(viii)
34 volcanoes, 19 of which are active and a full range of volcanic features typical for the Pacific Ring of Fire can be found in the site. Together with their associated features, such as calderas, scoriae cones, lava streams, cinder fields, thermal and mineral springs, geysers, solfataras, mud pots and others, as well as a wide range of active volcanic and geo-morphological processes, such as mudslides, they represent an outstanding example of geological processes and landforms (World Heritage Committee, 1996; UNEP-WCMC, 2012).
Landscapes of exceptional natural beauty
Criterion
(vii)
The site is a mosaic of near-pristine subarctic and boreal wilderness landscapes of exceptional natural beauty ranging from sea level to 4,686 m altitude, with perfectly pyramidal volcanoes, numerous active glaciers, taiga and tundra landscapes, various coastal landscapes, mountain streams and rivers, mountain lakes, geysers and hot springs and often spectacular gatherings of wildlife (World Heritage Committee, 1996; UNEP-WCMC, 2012).
A diverse range of palearctic flora
Criterion
(x)
Reportedly 1,168 plant species, 10% of which are endemic (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). Plant diversity is distributed between all main ecosystem types. Groups of particular conservation interest include orchids, coniferous trees, and grasses.
Subarctic and boreal terrestrial ecosystems
Criterion
(ix)
Wide range of near pristine terrestrial ecosystems corresponding to the altitudinal vegetation zones from sea level up to the alpine belt, with associated typical flora and fauna (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). The site contains specific zonal vegetation like deciduous Stone Birch forests (Betula ermanii), deciduous coniferous forests of Larch (Larix camtschatica), subalpine coniferous shrubland of Dwarf Pine (Pinus pumila), alpine grassland and rock vegetation, as well as azonal vegetation complexes like coastal vegetation, riparian forests, thermal spring vegetation, mires, lakes and wetlands. They develop in natural dynamic as ongoing process (restoration cycles of forests, adaptation to changing conditions, succession on lava fields and volcanic ashes.
Salmon populations
Criterion
(x)
The rivers and associated lake and coastal ecosystems of Kamchatka support the largest concentration and diversity of salmonid fish on Earth, as well as the world’s largest spawning place of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka), with all the Pacific salmon species coexisting and strong populations of other fish, such as rainbow trout (Salmo mykiss), char (Salvelinus spp.) and whitefish (Coregonus spp.) also present. For example, one watershed within Bystrinsky Nature Park (now part of Kamchatka Nature Park) contains eleven species of salmonids, and several other watersheds support similar diversities and concentrations of this group (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). Current research identified five endemic species of char (Salvelinus spp.) and an isolated population of white-spotted char (Salvelinus leucomaenis).This supports a remarkable piscivorous community, comprising the largest winter aggregations of raptors on Earth, large aquatic and seabird congregations, and several mammal populations including over 10,000 -14,000 Kamchatkan Brown Bear (Ursos arctos piscator) (WCS, n.d.) and Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris) (Justification for inscription, 1996; UNEP-WCMC, 2012).
Mammal fauna
Criterion
(x)
Although the site records only a moderate number of mammal species, in the context of the northern palearctic biogeographic realm this is high and a number of species are abundant, including Brown Bear (Ursus arctos piscator), Snow Sheep (Ovis nivicola nivicola), Wild Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), Sable (Martes zibellina), Wolverine (Gulo gulo), and Black-headed Marmot (Marmota camtschatica camtschatica). Kamchatka has a thriving population of brown bear (about 15,000) of which around one-fifth live within the site (IUCN, 2001). In addition important populations of marine mammals including the globally endangered Asian Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris gracilis), Steller’s Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus) and the Kuril Seal (Phoca vitulina stejnegeri) (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). In the marine part of the Kronotsky Reserve a seasonal concentration places of the endangered Grey Whale (Eschrichtius robustus) occur (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2015). According to more recent reports, the number of brown bears on the Kamchatka peninsula is 10,000 to 14,000 individuals (WCS, n.d.).
Avifauna
Criterion
(x)
Rich fauna of tundra and coastal birds (total number of recorded species 179) and largest wintering raptor congregation worldwide at South Kamchatka State Reserve, which is one of the component reserves of this serial site (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). Noteworthy birds include Steller's Sea Eagle (50% of world population), White-tailed Sea Eagle, Golden Eagle, Gyrfalcon and Peregrine Falcon. There are numerous seabird colonies and a large part of the global population of Aleutian Tern nest on the peninsula (IUCN, 2001).
Assessment information
The values of the site, particular those related to the biodiversity of Kamchatka, are currently seriously threatened by mining and unsustainable, insufficiently controlled natural resource use (mainly legal and illegal commercial salmon fishing and hunting). Construction of new roads and improvement of the existing ones associated with the development projects in the area provide better and uncontrolled access to near-pristine areas of the site and may lead to an increase in illegal natural resources use.
Mining/ Quarrying
(Mines near Bystrinskiy Nature Park and ongoing mining exploration in two areas near Southern Kamchatka Nature park)
Outside site
Two mines have already led to a revision of the boundaries of the Bystrinskiy Nature Park component of the property, thereby reducing the values of the overall property. Information on current ongoing threats is scarce but these probably include toxic contamination of surface waters, air pollution, and deterioration of scenic values. Reports of salmon die-offs near mines were received by the 2007 IUCN/WHC monitoring mission but could not be verified (UNESCO/ IUCN, 2007). No up-to-date information on this matter has been presented in more recent State of Conservation reports (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016, 2015 and 2013). This coincides with a quote in the Bystrinsky Nature Park management plan, which underlines that although the park boundaries were drawn in a way to exclude the areas for which gold mining licenses were given, “… it does not guarantee that this unique area will never suffer from penetrating to its entrails later” (Bystrinsky Nature Park management plan 2020 - 2024, English translation, p.9., quoted in UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Fishing / Harvesting Aquatic Resources
(Large-scale illegal commercial salmon fishing)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Large scale commercial salmon fishing (up to 200,000t annually throughout Kamchatka including the World Heritage site – Dronova & Spirodonov, 2008) mainly for roe is considered a major threat to the still relatively resilient stocks of the area, which is one of the last Pacific salmon strongholds (UNESCO/ IUCN, 2007; UNESCO, 2012; Dronova & Spiridonov, 2008; Levin, 2010). Above-quota fishing by legal fishermen and Illegal fishing in coastal waters also affects stocks (Dronova & Spiridonov, 2008). No effective control system in place and salmon poaching is the main income source near rivers. Poaching industry reportedly has the same value as the legal fishing industry (US$ 600 million), with export values of one illegally caught species from the Russian Far East estimated at up to $70 million annually (Clarke et al., 2009). Dramatic decrease in many rivers’ stocks reported by Levin (2010).
Roads/ Railroads
(Improved road access)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Construction of new roads and improvement of existing ones provides access to near-prisitine areas of the site and may lead to uncontrolled natural resource use and visitation. The increase in accessibility provided by the mining roads appears to be limited in comparison to the existing network of tracks for all-terrain vehicles (UNESCO/IUCN, 2007), but the gas pipeline construction road in West Kamchatka has reportedly led to a significant increase in salmon poaching in the area (Levin, 2010). Uncontrolled access for private cars and tour operators and a rising number of all-terrain-vehicles and quad bikes have also been observed (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Logging/ Wood Harvesting
(Illegal logging and forest fires)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Some insignificant damage (approximately 1% of areas affected over 10 years) by forest fires, especially in Bystrinsky cluster of Nature Park (IUCN Consultation, 2020), and illegal and poorly documented logging by locals has previously been reported (UNESCO, 2012). However, no up-to-date information is available.
Hunting and trapping
(Hunting of brown bear, sable and particularly snow sheep for trophies, furs and traditional medicinal products)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Reportedly more than 10% of Kamchatka population of brown bear (340-555 individuals) were poached in 2002 (Seryodkin & Pachkovskiy, 2006). Trophy hunting has been declining recently as there are fewer bears left that would be valuable as trophies. Declines in sable and snow sheep populations have been reported in Bystrinskiy Nature Park. Not all of this is caused by poaching since legal hunting is permitted in component sites with nature park status. However no reliable monitoring and quota setting system is in place (UNESCO/IUCN, 2007).
Fishing / Harvesting Aquatic Resources
(Illegal fishing)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Illegal natural resource exploitation registered by the staff of the protected areas include arrivals of sea vessels in the protected areas and illegal fishing (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016).
Plans to construct two hydropower stations on the Kronotskaya River inside Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve were abandoned in 2012, but there are plans for other hydropower stations outside but near the site that require further examination. However, recently it has been reported by the State Party that at the present time the construction of Zhupanovskaya Hydroelectric Power Station was not considered any longer. Plans for geological prospecting activity and potential mining on the territory of Bystrinsky Nature Park could also lead to the loss of the Outstanding Universal Value on the considerable part of the site’s territory. The recent consideration of a substantial modification to the boundaries of the site to enable the development of a large-scale resort on the current territory of South Kamchatka Nature Park is of high concern.
Renewable Energy
(Two hydropower stations outside the Kronotskiy reserve at Zhupanovaya River)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Plans for hydropower stations on Zhupanovaya River (outside the World Heritage site but very near it) had been previously developed. This construction could affect the integrity of some natural values of the site, such as the wild Reindeer population that uses Zhupanovskaya tundra as winter pasture. Recently it has been reported by the State Party that at the present time the construction of Zhupanovskaya Hydroelectric Power Station was not considered. The government of Kamchatka Region has been commissioned by the President of the Russian Federation to consider alternative options of providing the region with electric power (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016). However, no update on the final status of these projects is available.
Mining/ Quarrying
(Plans for additional mining exploration, such as in Bystrinskiy Nature Park)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Information on potential threats related to mining is scarce, in the absence of EIAs, but these might include reduction of the size of the World Heritage site, toxic contamination of surface waters, air pollution, and deterioration of scenic values (UNESCO/ IUCN, 2007). A project of the new Regulations of Bystrinsky Nature Park foresees that the works on the geological survey of subsoil could be allowed on a considerable part of the park territory (Greenpeace Russia, 2012; IUCN Consultation, 2012). Recently, no mining activities are reported to be planned inside the site (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Tourism/ visitors/ recreation
(Increasing recreational impact / increase number of cross-country vehicles)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
The increase of cross-country vehicles owned by local population in the agglomeration close to Nalychevo Nature Park and good transport availability are reported as potential threats (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016).
Intensified use of all-terrain-vehicles and quad bikes widens the zone of negative influence as off-road-tracks extended (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Intensified use of all-terrain-vehicles and quad bikes widens the zone of negative influence as off-road-tracks extended (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Tourism/ Recreation Areas
(Three Volcanoes resort project)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
The development of the Three Volcano Project would entail threats from a high number of tourists and additional tourist infrastructure (cable car, visitors centre, cruise ship port) close to and inside one of the components of the World Heritage site (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019). The project was assessed in the reactive monitoring mission as 'incompatible with the preservation of the integrity of the property and if allowed to proceed, the project would result in a severe deterioration of the natural beauty and scientific value of the component South Kamchatka Nature Park, to an extent that might warrant the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger' (UNESCO/ IUCN, 2019) and therefore constitutes a high threat. The borders of South Kamchatka Nature Park have already been changed in which an area was excluded from the territory of the northern cluster for the implementation of a “Three Volcanoes Park” project. This area now has no legal protection (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The State Party has submitted a minor modification to the boundaries of the site to the World heritage Committee, in order to enable the development of the project. Its evaluation is currently ongoing. However it is noted in the reactive monitoring mission report that 'such a boundary modification will have to be considered as a significant boundary modification in line with paragraph 165 of the Operational Guidelines' (UNESCO/ IUCN, 2019).
Marine/ Freshwater Aquaculture
(Channel along the Kronotsky river)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
The construction of a channel along the Kronotsky river, that had previously been proposed, would change the water regime and the habitats with negative impacts on the sockeye salmon inside the World Heritage site (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2019). According to the State Party and management authorities, the project is currently suspended (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
The values of the site, particular those related to the biodiversity of Kamchatka, are currently seriously threatened by mining and unsustainable, insufficiently controlled natural resource use (mainly illegal salmon fishing and commercial hunting). Construction of new roads and improvement of the existing ones associated with the development projects in the area provide better access to near-pristine areas of the site and may lead to an increase in illegal natural resources use. The decline of biodiversity may be further accelerated by the planned development projects, particularly new mineral exploration/mining projects. The construction of a proposed tourist resort close to the South Kamchatka Nature Park (northern cluster) requiring a boundary modification of the site could cause enormous pressure on valuable landscapes, the avifauna and marine ecosystems and lead to a deterioration of terrestrial and marine habitats.
Management system
This is a serial World Heritage site which includes several protected areas of different categories. 95% of Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve (Zapovednik) and 80% of South Kamchatka Federal Sanctuary (Zakaznik) are under strict conservation management on the base of federal regulations and correspond to IUCN category I or II. A management plan for the Biosphere Reserve, comprising of Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve and South Kamchatka Sanctuary, but not considering specific requirements of the World heritage designation, was approved for the period 2017 to 2021.
The other four components of the serial site were designated as Nature Parks by regulations of the regional government. New management plans were developed individually for the period 2020 to 2024, but of insufficient quality. The Nature Parks roughly corresponding to IUCN PA Category V. Until 2010 each of the Nature Parks was an independent state institution on regional level. According to the resolution No.191 “On Reorganizing Certain Kray State Institutions” adopted by the Governor of Kamchatka Kray on August 14, 2009 and with Order No. 78-P “On Reorganizing Kray State Institutions” adopted by Kamchatka Kray Natural Resources Ministry on August 17, 2009 the for institutions were reorganized in one “Kray State Institution Volcanoes of Kamchatka Nature Park” (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2015). The new administration structure was introduced for the joint management of the component parts in regional responsibility. However, an overarching plan for a joint management of the entire World Heritage Site was not developed yet and is not foreseen (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016; UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
The other four components of the serial site were designated as Nature Parks by regulations of the regional government. New management plans were developed individually for the period 2020 to 2024, but of insufficient quality. The Nature Parks roughly corresponding to IUCN PA Category V. Until 2010 each of the Nature Parks was an independent state institution on regional level. According to the resolution No.191 “On Reorganizing Certain Kray State Institutions” adopted by the Governor of Kamchatka Kray on August 14, 2009 and with Order No. 78-P “On Reorganizing Kray State Institutions” adopted by Kamchatka Kray Natural Resources Ministry on August 17, 2009 the for institutions were reorganized in one “Kray State Institution Volcanoes of Kamchatka Nature Park” (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2015). The new administration structure was introduced for the joint management of the component parts in regional responsibility. However, an overarching plan for a joint management of the entire World Heritage Site was not developed yet and is not foreseen (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016; UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Effectiveness of management system
No systematic management effectiveness assessment using standard methodology (e.g. RAPPAM, METT) has been conducted. A biodiversity trend assessment revealed decreasing abundances of most key species in four component sites between 2003 and 2007, suggesting insufficient management effectiveness (Mosolov, 2008). Management effectiveness of the South Kamchatka Nature Park component has been characterized as extremely low by local PA staff (IUCN Consultation, 2012), primarily because of dramatically insufficient institutional capacity (staffing, resourcing, specialist training, coordination and enforcement powers). Management effectiveness of the federal PAs comprising the site is considered somewhat higher. The ban on net fishing in the mouth of the Nalychevo River has had a positive influence on the Pacific Salmon population in the entire river catchment. Regular surveillance activities reduced illegal extraction of aquatic biological resources with positive effects on the populations of predators like Brown Bear, Wolverine, Steller’s Sea Eagle (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016).
Boundaries
This is a serial site consisting of 6 components, which increases the border/area ratio and poses additional management challenges. There are no official buffer zones, but a proposal was made to create a buffer zone for Kronotsky Zapovednik (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019). The 2007 monitoring mission recommended to clarify and communicate the site’s boundaries as geographical coordinates as some inconsistencies were noticed (UNESCO, 2012). The most recent figures provided in State Party of the Russian Federation, state an area for the World Heritage site of 3,959,952.9 hectares. This represents a clarification with regards to the area of the nature parks components of the World Heritage site having noted discrepancies with previously reported figures. However, since only boundaries of one component (Southern Kamchatka Nature Park) have been recently clarified through the Retrospective Inventory process, the boundaries of all other components of the site remain somewhat uncertain and have been recommended to also be 'formally updated through the submission of high-resolution maps and shapefiles' (UNESCO, 2018), which have yet to be provided (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2019; UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
None of the six components within the Volcanoes of Kamchatka World Heritage site have a formal buffer zone. However the Kronotsky Biosphere reserve is surrounded by a so-called cooperation zone, and there is a proposal to designate a 840,285 hectare buffer zone for the Kronotsky Zapovednik, aiming to conserve the wild Northern reindeer and bighorn sheep populations (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019). Concerns are also noted around new zoning of different components of the site which greatly diminished the area of the site under strict protection regime (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019), therefore posing threats to the values of the site.
The boundaries of the South Kamchatka Nature Park have already been changed at national level in which an area was excluded from the territory of the northern cluster for the implementation of a “Three Volcanoes Park” project (Government of the Russian Federation, 2020). In 2020, a minor modification proposal was submitted by the State Party to the World Heritage Committee to reflect this. It is currently being evaluated. The 2019 mission report (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019) states that the Three Volcano Park, would 'establish a huge tourist resort at the edge of the property, with installations within it and serious impacts on this component of the property and the property’s OUV'.
None of the six components within the Volcanoes of Kamchatka World Heritage site have a formal buffer zone. However the Kronotsky Biosphere reserve is surrounded by a so-called cooperation zone, and there is a proposal to designate a 840,285 hectare buffer zone for the Kronotsky Zapovednik, aiming to conserve the wild Northern reindeer and bighorn sheep populations (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019). Concerns are also noted around new zoning of different components of the site which greatly diminished the area of the site under strict protection regime (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019), therefore posing threats to the values of the site.
The boundaries of the South Kamchatka Nature Park have already been changed at national level in which an area was excluded from the territory of the northern cluster for the implementation of a “Three Volcanoes Park” project (Government of the Russian Federation, 2020). In 2020, a minor modification proposal was submitted by the State Party to the World Heritage Committee to reflect this. It is currently being evaluated. The 2019 mission report (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019) states that the Three Volcano Park, would 'establish a huge tourist resort at the edge of the property, with installations within it and serious impacts on this component of the property and the property’s OUV'.
Integration into regional and national planning systems
Limited information is available. Previous plans to build two power stations inside Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve (now suspended) indicate that the safeguarding of the integrity of this site is not well recognized in regional planning.
Relationships with local people
Little information is available and no systematic stakeholder analysis has been documented. There have been conflicts between local people and authorities about the allocation procedure for hunting licenses, which puts local indigenous hunters at disadvantage (UNESCO/IUCN, 2007), and about the exclusive use rights of indigenous fishing grounds (Indigenous Portal, 2010).
Legal framework
In 2009, Kamchatka Nature Park was formed including four of the six protected areas making up the Volcanoes of Kamchatka serial World Heritage site. The legal protection status of the parts of the site that are designated as Nature Parks is insufficient for a long-term protection of the site’s values (UNESCO, 2012). Neither a joint management plan for the entire World Heritage site nor guidelines for harmonization of individual management plans are available. Competences and jurisdiction are split between federal and local/regional authorities (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019). The Kamchatka territory law No. 375 of 27.09.2019 "On amendments to the law of the Kamchatka territory "On specially protected natural areas of Kamchatka Territory"" was adopted on 27.09.2019 (http://docs.cntd.ru/document/561554836). The adopted law allows changing the boundaries of protected natural areas of regional significance, in particular excluding territories from them. The law creates a legal basis for the change of borders and reorganization of protected areas of regional significance of Kamchatka Territory, including those that constitute the World Heritage site.
Law enforcement
No specific assessment of enforcement capacity is available; however, given overall low human and financial resources and given the large size of the site, enforcement capacity is probably limited. A case in point is the threat of poaching noted in the report on the State of Conservation of the Volcanoes of Kamchatka, which recommended that the State Party supports the efforts to address poaching through increased staffing and budgets (UNESCO, 2018).
Implementation of Committee decisions and recommendations
The site has been subject to numerous recent decisions and recommendations of the World Heritage Committee, as well as reactive monitoring missions by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and IUCN. In 2015, the State Party gave a response “with regard to Resolution No. 37COM 7B.21 adopted by the World Heritage Committee” in Phnom Penh 2013. With the “Report On the State of Conservation of the UNESCO World Heritage Property Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation, Nr. 765bis) in 2015” from January 29, 2016 the State Party also gives a response to the Decision 37 COM 7B.21 (World Heritage Committee, 2013), recalled by Decision 39 COM 7B.20 (World Heritage Committee, 2015). In 2019, the State Party delivered an updated Report on the State of Conservation of the UNESCO World Heritage Property Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation, No 765 bis) in 2019. A joint UNESCO World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the World Heritage property “Volcanoes of Kamchatka“ was organised in August 2019 (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019). It should be noted that a number of recommendations have been noted in the 2019 mission report (UNESCO/IUCN. 2019), which relate specifically to recommendations which remain outstanding from previous decisions and missions, and 'since 2007, possible threats to the property and problems arising from various projects like mining and the use of geothermal energy, from poaching and illegal hunting, but also from uncoordinated and uncontrolled tourism, have been regularly discussed by the World Heritage Committee, but have not diminished substantially' (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Sustainable use
While the Strict Nature Reserves and State Sanctuary exclude most types of resource use, management of use for sustainability in Kamchatka Nature Park is only partly within its jurisdiction. Sustainable reindeer grazing is practiced at the Bystrinskiy part of Kamchatka Nature Park. Hunting and fishing are partly forbidden, but uncontrolled.
Sustainable finance
The main funding source is the Kamchatka Kray budget. The financing of the nature parks was considered unsustainable in 2007 (UNESCO/IUCN, 2007) and had only increased by ca. 20% until 2011, to ca. $1.1 million annually (UNESCO, 2012). The funding of all (regional) Kamchatka protected areas of 29 million rubles per year was considered insufficient in 2012, and is merely meeting staff and some limited operational costs (IUCN Consultation, 2012). This suggests that the World Heritage site as a whole lacks a sustainable financing base (funding gap estimated as $700,000 per year – UNESCO/IUCN, 2007), particularly regarding the still insufficient number of ranger staff in relation to its size.
There is no recent information about the overall budget of the entire World Heritage site. The two component parts in federal administration are financed by the federal budget. The four component parts of the Kamchatka Nature Park are financed by the regional government of Kamchatka Kray. There are differences between the federal and the regional administrated components. The situation of the federal components seems much better, but numbers are not indicated in the State Party of the Russian Federation, 2015 and 2016. According to the recent Reactive Monitoring Mission report, the financial resources for the various components are still insufficient, though the Kronotsky Zapovednik and the South Kamchatka Sanctuary are better equipped (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
There is no recent information about the overall budget of the entire World Heritage site. The two component parts in federal administration are financed by the federal budget. The four component parts of the Kamchatka Nature Park are financed by the regional government of Kamchatka Kray. There are differences between the federal and the regional administrated components. The situation of the federal components seems much better, but numbers are not indicated in the State Party of the Russian Federation, 2015 and 2016. According to the recent Reactive Monitoring Mission report, the financial resources for the various components are still insufficient, though the Kronotsky Zapovednik and the South Kamchatka Sanctuary are better equipped (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Staff capacity, training, and development
Staffing levels of Volcanoes of Kamchatka Nature Park are considered dramatically insufficient in relation to its size. The staff number of the Kronotsky Zapovednik, financed by federal budget was 110 employees in 2015. The Nature Park Volcanoes of Kamchatka with 4 components had only 37 employees in 2015 (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016). The State Party of the Russian Federation (2016) also indicates several educational events in 2015, e.g. a training seminar “Preparation of guides for specially protected areas of Kamchatka Region”, jointly organized by the Kronotsky Reserve together with the administration of Volcanoes of Kamchatka Nature Park, and supported by the regional non-commercial organization “Association of Specially Protected Areas of Kamchatka Region”.
Education and interpretation programs
There is no education and interpretation programme at the level of the entire site but at least one of the federal component reserves has such a programme (Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve, 2012b). Education and interpretation programs were also included in the UNDP/GEF project “Demonstrating sustainable conservation of biological diversity in four protected areas of Russia’s Kamchatka Oblast”. These have apparently not contributed to reduction of unsustainable natural resource use inside the site.
Tourism and visitation management
There are tourism routes and four visitor centres in the parts of Kamchatka Nature Park and another one in the Valley of the Geysers in Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve, but there still is no overall tourism strategy, functional ecotourism system (IUCN Consultation, 2012), approach to explaining the values of the site, or integrated tourism management strategy, which were recommended by the 2007 IUCN/WHC monitoring mission (UNESCO, 2012). In the two federal component parts a Plan of educational tourism for the years 2015-2016 was developed and implemented in the Kronotsky Reserve and the South Kamchatka Sanctuary. At the present time there are 12 tourist routes in Kronotsky Reserve (3 water routes, 9 walking tours incl. 1 multi-day tour). In South Kamchatka Sanctuary Sanctuary there are 10 tourist routes (2 water routes, 8 walking tours). Excursions and recreational activities on the territories of the 4 nature park component parts are conducted within the boundaries of the determined recreational areas. There are 25 tourist routes. According to the results of the monitoring no negative irreversible changes of natural landscapes and their components in the areas of recreational activity were found (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2016).
Increasing visitor pressure on the World Heritage site requires an improvement of suitable infrastructure outside the site and effective efforts for the visitor management inside the component parts, to avoid a “wild development” by private tourism companies (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Available data on the number of tourists in the property are not reliable. The figures probably contain only the number of tourists flying in with helicopters. The 2019 reactive monitoring mission recommended to develop, in parallel to management plans, a Tourism Development Master plan based on actual figures and projections, setting clear thresholds of the carrying capacity of the site in its entirety and of its individual components (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Increasing visitor pressure on the World Heritage site requires an improvement of suitable infrastructure outside the site and effective efforts for the visitor management inside the component parts, to avoid a “wild development” by private tourism companies (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Available data on the number of tourists in the property are not reliable. The figures probably contain only the number of tourists flying in with helicopters. The 2019 reactive monitoring mission recommended to develop, in parallel to management plans, a Tourism Development Master plan based on actual figures and projections, setting clear thresholds of the carrying capacity of the site in its entirety and of its individual components (UNESCO/IUCN, 2019).
Monitoring
There is no monitoring of the state of the natural values of the site (UNESCO, 2012). A simple monitoring system for a few key species was established for 4 component sites as part of the UNDP/GEF biodiversity project (Mosolov, 2008). Meanwhile several activities for monitoring of key mammal species (e.g. wild reindeer, marmot, snow sheep, grey whale) have started. Nevertheless, the data on snow sheep is deficient and the recent data on wild reindeer accumulated by the Kronotsky reserve shows that the populations is dramatically decreasing. Further, a monitoring of impacts from tourism would help to define the carrying capacity of certain areas within the site (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Research
A range of research projects on ecosystems and species in cooperation with academic institutions have been conducted at Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve and South Kamchatka State Sanctuary (Kronotskiy State Nature Reserve, 2012c). Further research activities have been started and first results are available, e.g. about marking activities of brown bear (Seryodkin, 2014) and geyser activities in Kronotsky Reserve (Kiryuklin, 2016). Series of scientific studies are carried out, but obviously not systematically implemented in the management plans.
In spite of progress in administration structure, and some further success in the field of ecological education, ecotourism development and research in some component sites, low staff numbers, lack of equipment and financial resources are hindering the management capacity to safeguard effectively the values of this large and geographically complex site. This is particularly true for the components of the site designated as regional protected areas. Recent legislative changes providing a legal basis for introducing changes to the boundaries of specially protected natural areas of regional significance which comprise components of the site are of particular concern.
Assessment of the effectiveness of protection and management in addressing threats outside the site
Some Concern
The current conservation regime is insufficient to effectively protect the values even inside the Nature Park components of the site, because of the very low staff number and lack of equipment and resources, and this is also true for protection against threats outside the site. Poaching outside the boundaries of the component protected areas poses a significant threat to some species, such as snow sheep (State Party of the Russian Federation, 2015).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
High Concern
Trend
Stable
The geological and scenic values of the World Heritage site are in a good and stable state, including the ongoing geological processes. The status of the biodiversity and ecosystem values is mainly stable, but influenced by resource use. However, populations of some key species (snow sheep, wild reindeer) have been decreasing significantly and pressures from illegal hunting and fishing on some species and uncontrolled tourism remain high.
Additional information
Fishing areas and conservation of fish stocks
Salmon and salmon roe is currently the main resource used from the site and its surroundings, and the main income source for the local population. It also contributes significantly to the fisheries resources used in the Russian Federation, Japan, China and beyond.
Outdoor recreation and tourism
Nature based tourism is already a growing activity and income source although its potential is not fully exploited yet.
Sacred natural sites or landscapes
With its volcanic landscapes, ecosystems and biodiversity, Kamchatka is one of the last great wilderness areas of the planet.
Livestock grazing areas
Reindeer grazing is practiced in the Bystrinsky part of Kamchatka Nature Park and is an example for natural resource use by indigenous inhabitants that is both traditional and sustainable.
The landscapes, ecosystems and biodiversity of the site provide a wide range of benefits of local, regional, national and global importance which, if used and managed in a sustainable manner, could support a prosperous development of the remote Kamchatka region in the long term and at the same time contribute to the richness of human heritage in general.
№ | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
---|---|---|---|
1 | WWF Russia | Ecoregional conservation programme for the Kamchatka-Bering ecoregion (broad programme type approach including PAs, wildlife resource use, engaging mining companies etc.) |
http://www.wwf.ru/about/contacts/doc128/page6/
|
2 | Wildlife Conservation Society | Kamchatka Brown Bear Program (bear conservation, current activities unclear) |
http://programs.wcs.org/russia/Projects/KamchatkaBrownBearProgram /tabid/1463/language/en-US/Default.aspx
|
3 | Greenpeace Russia | Addressing main threats, education and awareness raising |
https://maps.greenpeace.org/maps/unesco/?lang=en
|
References
№ | References |
---|---|
1 |
Clarke, S.C., McAllister, M.K. and Kirkpatrick, R.C. (2009). ‘Estimating legal and illegal catches of Russian sockeye salmon from trade and market data’. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66(3): 532-545.
|
2 |
Dronova, N. A. & Spiridonov, V.A. (2008). ‘Illegal, unreported and unregulated Pacific salmon fishing in Kamchatka’. Moscow: WWF Russia. [Online report], ( 2008). http://www.wwf.ru/resources/publ/book/eng/313. Accessed 5 May 2012.
|
3 |
EPRNews (2012). ‘The hydropower station in Kamchatka Krai will be built at the Shupanova River instead of Kronotskiy’. [Online resource], (June 2012). http://www.eprussia.ru/news/base/2012/76985.htm. Accessed 22 November 2012. (in Russian)
|
4 |
Government of the Russian Federation (2020). Постановление Губернатора Камчатского края от 11.06.2020 № 97 "О внесении изменений в постановление главы администрации Камчатской области от 18.08.1995 № 193 "О создании природного парка регионального значения "Южно-Камчатский" [online] Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/4100202006110…) [Accessed 11 December 2020].
|
5 |
IMC Montan (2011). ‘Pre-Feasibility Study, TEO (Project) Mining Part Update and Resource & Reserve Valuation of OAO “Zoloto Kamchatki” Gold Ore Deposits’. [Online resource]. http://www.imcmontan.ru/eng/experience/projects/index.html. Accessed 22 November 2012.
|
6 |
IUCN (2001). World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation: Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russia). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2001, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. [online], Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/765/documents/. [Accessed 22 November 2012].
|
7 |
IUCN Consultation (2012). IUCN Confidential Consultation- Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation.
|
8 |
IUCN Consultation (2017). IUCN Confidential Consultation- Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation.
|
9 |
IUCN Consultation (2020). IUCN Confidential Consultation- Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation.
|
10 |
Ilyukhin, V. I. (2012).’Investment Passport of Kamchtskiy Krai’. Petropawlovsk-Kamchtskiy: Governor of Kamchtskiy Krai.
|
11 |
Indigenous Portal (2010). ‘Indigenous peoples of Kamchatka prepare to protest’. [Online resource], (28 May 2010). http://www.indigenousportal.com/Urgent/Indigenous-peoples-o…. Accessed 5 May 2012.
|
12 |
Kiryuklin, A. (2016): Modeling and observations of geyser activity in relation to catastrophic landslides-mudflows (Kronotsky nature reserve, Kamchatka, Russia). Journal of Vulcanology and Geothermal Research 323: 129-147.
|
13 |
Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve (2012a). [online] Available at: http://www.kronoki.ru/. [Accessed 5 May 2012]. (in Russian)
|
14 |
Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve (2012b). ‘Education and ecological awareness raising’. [online] Available at: http://www.kronoki.ru/act/ecotourism. [Accessed 5 May 2012]. (in Russian)
|
15 |
Kronotskiy Strict Nature Reserve (2012c). ‘Research and monitoring’. [online] Available at: http://www.kronoki.ru/act/scientific/articles. [Accessed 5 May 2012]. (in Russian)
|
16 |
Levin, D. (2010). ‘Kamchatka: The salmon country’. With the support of WWF Russia. [online] Available at: http://wn.com/Kamchatka_The_Salmon_Country_Part_1. [Accessed 5 May 2012].
|
17 |
Mosolov, V. I (2008). ‘Elaboration of an indicator system for the assessment of the effectiveness of nature conservation in four special protected areas of Kamchatka Oblast’. [Online report], (January 2008). http://www.unkam.ru/english/Results/1.shtml. Accessed 5 May 2012. (in Russian)
|
18 |
Seryodkin, I. V.& Pachkovskiy, D. (2006). “A Program to Study and Conserve the Brown Bear of Kamchatka.” In: The Bears of Russia and Neighboring Countries: Population Status, Interactions with Humans, Exploitation, Hunting, Reproduction. pp. 116-120. Krasnogorsk: Delovoy Mir.(in Russian)
|
19 |
Seryodkin, V. (2014). Marking activity of the Kamchatka brown bear (Ursus arctos piscator). Achievements in the Life Sciences, 8, 153-161.
|
20 |
State Party of the Russian Federation (2013). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation).
|
21 |
State Party of the Russian Federation (2015). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/765/documents/ [Accessed 10 December 2020].
|
22 |
State Party of the Russian Federation (2016). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/765/documents/ [Accessed 10 December 2020].
|
23 |
State Party of the Russian Federation (2019). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation).
|
24 |
TRAFFIC (2008). ‘Kamchatka smugglers caught with Gyrfalcons’. [Online resource], (November 2008)’. . Accessed 22 November 2012.
|
25 |
UNDP (2011). ‘Final evaluation: UNDP-GEF Project Demonstrating biodiversity conservation in four protected areas of Russia’s Kamchatka Krai. Phase 2’. [Online report], (August 2011). http://www.undp.ru/index.php?iso=RU&lid=1&cmd=programs&id=14. Accessed 5 May 2012.
|
26 |
UNEP-WCMC (2011). ‘Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation. World Heritage Information Sheet’. [Online resource], (May 2011)’. http://www.unep-wcmc.org/medialibrary/2011/06/10/a1bd1759/V…. Accessed 5 May 2012.
|
27 |
UNESCO (2010). Report on the State of Conservation of Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation (N 765 bis). State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/542 [Accessed 23 February 2017].
|
28 |
UNESCO (2012). Report on the State of Conservation of Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation (N 765 bis). State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/90 [Accessed 23 February 2017].
|
29 |
UNESCO (2018). Report on the State of Conservation of Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation (N 765 bis). State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3668 [Accessed 11 December 2020].
|
30 |
UNESCO and IUCN (2007). Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre – IUCN Reactive Monitoring Mission to Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation, from 24 September to 2 October. [online] Paris, France and Gland, Switzerland: UNESCO World Heritage Centre and IUCN. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/765/documents/ [Accessed 10 December 2020].
|
31 |
UNESCO/IUCN (2019). Report on the joint mission of the UNESCO World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the Volcanoes of Kamchatka, Russian Federation, 8 – 14 August 2019. [online] Paris, France & Gland, Switzerland: UNESCO & IUCN. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/765/documents/ [Accessed 10 December 2020].
|
32 |
WCS (n.d.). Kamchatka Brown Bear Ecology. [online] WCS Russia. Available at: https://russia.wcs.org/en-us/Wildlife/Kamchatka-Brown-Bears… [Accessed 11 December 2020].
|
33 |
World Heritage Committee (2013). Decision : 37 COM 7B.21 Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation) (N 765bis). In: Report of decisions of the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee (Phnom Penh, 2013). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5040 [Accessed 10 December 2020].
|
34 |
World Heritage Committee (2015). Decision : 39 COM 7B.20 Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation) (N 765). In: Report of decisions of the 39th session of the World Heritage Committee (Bonn, 2015). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6277 [Accessed 10 December 2020].
|
35 |
World Heritage Committee (2018). Decision : 42 COM 7B.79 Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation) (N 765bis). In: Report of decisions of the 42nd session of the World Heritage Committee (Manama, 2018). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/7308 [Accessed 10 December 2020].
|