Te Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand

Country
New Zealand
Inscribed in
1986
Criteria
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
The landscape in this park, situated in south-west New Zealand, has been shaped by successive glaciations into fjords, rocky coasts, towering cliffs, lakes and waterfalls. Two-thirds of the park is covered with southern beech and podocarps, some of which are over 800 years old. The kea, the only alpine parrot in the world, lives in the park, as does the rare and endangered takahe, a large flightless bird. © UNESCO

Summary
2020 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
25 Jan 2023
Good with some concerns
Current state and trend of VALUES
Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Finalised on
25 Jan 2023
Description of values
A vast primeval wilderness of mountains and fiords of outstanding scenic beauty
Criterion
(vii)
The World Heritage site contains many of the natural features that contribute to New Zealand's international reputation for superlative landscapes: its highest mountains, longest glaciers, tallest forests, wildest rivers and gorges, most rugged coastlines, and deepest fiords and lakes. The temperate rainforests of the site are unmatched in their composition, extent and intactness by any such forests elsewhere in the world. Human influences are evident but in relation to the overall scale of the site these are mainly in peripheral areas and in most cases, are related to tourism activities (World Heritage Committee, 2012).
Many classic examples of the tectonic and glacial features and processes that have shaped the earth
Criterion
(viii)
The site is considered as the best modern representation of the primitive taxa of Gondwanaland. The breakup of this southern super-continent and New Zealand’s long isolation is considered to be among some of the most important events in the earth’s evolutionary history. It enabled the survival of ancient Gondwanan biota to a greater degree than elsewhere, living representatives of which include flightless kiwis, carnivorous land snails, and 14 species of podocarp and genera of beech. The Great Alpine Fault that bisects the region marks the collision between the Indo-Australian and Pacific tectonic plates resulting in the massive up thrust of the Southern Alps that rise to nearly 4,000m within 30km of the ocean. The World Heritage site presents remarkable evidence of the impact of Pleistocene glaciations. Spectacular landforms include: 15 fiords carved from plutonic igneous rock; a series of large lake-filled troughs; classic erosion features such as U-shaped and hanging valleys, cirques, and ice-shorn spurs; chronological sequences of moraines and outwash gravels from valley and piedmont glaciers. Many glaciers are currently receding but in recent times these almost extended to the sea. The Franz Josef Kä Roimata o Hinehukatere and Fox Te Moeka o Tuawe glaciers which descend into temperate rainforest are also demonstrating significant recession particularly over the last 15 years. Complementing the glacial landforms is a sequence of 13 marine terraces progressively uplifted more than 1000m over the past 1 million years. The effects of climate change are increasing the pace of change in landform structure (State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003; Hutching and Potton, Eds., 1987; IUCN, 1990; World Heritage Committee, 2012).
The largest and least modified expanse of New Zealand’s natural ecosystems
Criterion
(ix)
Temperate rainforest, alpine and freshwater ecosystems are all well represented over an extensive array of landforms and across wide climatic and altitudinal gradients. Notable examples of on-going biological processes occur in the large expanses of temperate rainforest, plant succession following glacial retreat, soil/plant chrono-sequences on beach ridges, plant succession on alluvial terraces, vegetation gradients around the margins of glacial lakes and ecotypic differentiation of plants on ultramafic soils. The extensive and little-modified freshwater habitats, the impressive diversity of alpine ecosystems, extensive alpine botanical endemism, and on-going evolution associated with long-standing geographical isolation of animal populations, such as the kiwi taxa, are further examples of on-going biological development (State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003; World Heritage Committee, 2012). A number of ecosystems that are naturally rare including sand dunes, gravel beaches, rock stacks, coastal turfs, moraines, frost hollows, granitic gravel fields, braided river beds, caves, lake margins, ephemeral wetlands, tarns, estuaries, lagoons, seepages/flushes and snow banks are present in large and intact areas (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Unique biota in a relatively pristine state
Criterion
(x)
The habitats of Te Wāhipounamu contain an extensive range of New Zealand’s remarkable endemic fauna, which reflects a long evolutionary isolation and the absence of mammalian predators. The property contains the entire wild population of the rare and endangered takahë (Notornis mantelli); the entire population of the South Island subspecies of brown kiwi (Apteryx australis); New Zealand’s rarest Kiwi, the rowi (Apteryx rowi); the only significant remaining populations of the seriously declining mohua/yellowhead (Mohoua acrocephaly); the only large populations remaining of kaki and käkäriki/yellow-crowned parakeet; the entire breeding population of tawaki/Fiordland crested penguin (Eudyptes pachyrhynchus); a number of unique lizard species including Okarito gecko and Cascade gecko; a stronghold for kea, and the only remaining population of partake/Fiordland brown teal in the South Island (World Heritage Committee, 2012). The site also contains many of the taonga species of high value to Ngāi Tahu that are identified in Schedule 97 of the Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998. The world's rarest and heaviest parrot, kakapo (Striges aerophiles), survived in Fiordland until the early 1980s. It is now thought to be extinct on the mainland and its survival depends on careful management of a limited number of offshore island populations, including Codfish Island/Whenua Hou near Stewart Island and Anchor Island within Fiordland National Park (http://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/native-animals/birds/birds-a-z/kakapo/).
The diversity of landforms and ecosystems is reflected in the diversity of flora present, but also in the extent of the area and intactness. Many threatened species are present particularly in coastal, lowland forest and lake margins/ephemeral wetlands. Threatened species include the ‘Nationally Critical’ small daisy Brachyscome linearis which is restricted to lakeshore turf habitats from within Te Wāhipounamu; the creeping foxglove Ourisia modesta, and the silky fan fern Sticherus tener. Three other plants are listed as ‘Nationally Critical’ because of their vulnerability to myrtle rust – the dwarf mistletoe Korthalsella salicornioides, and shrubs Lophomyrtus obcordata (rohutu) and Neomyrtus pedunculata (ramarama). Te Wāhipounamu is a national stronghold for some species including the scarlet mistletoe (Peraxilla colensoi), the shrubs Coprosma wallii, Pittosporum obcordatum (heart-leaved kohuhu), Melicytus flexuosus and Olearia lineata; and one of the only two remnant sites for the native broom Carmichaelia juncea. Many plants are endemic to Te Wāhipounamu, including in the gerera Celmisia, Chionochloa, Aciphylla. The endemism is greatest in the alpine zone, and amongst wetland species. Several other species meet their distribution limits in Te Wāhipounamu (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
The diversity of landforms and ecosystems is reflected in the diversity of flora present, but also in the extent of the area and intactness. Many threatened species are present particularly in coastal, lowland forest and lake margins/ephemeral wetlands. Threatened species include the ‘Nationally Critical’ small daisy Brachyscome linearis which is restricted to lakeshore turf habitats from within Te Wāhipounamu; the creeping foxglove Ourisia modesta, and the silky fan fern Sticherus tener. Three other plants are listed as ‘Nationally Critical’ because of their vulnerability to myrtle rust – the dwarf mistletoe Korthalsella salicornioides, and shrubs Lophomyrtus obcordata (rohutu) and Neomyrtus pedunculata (ramarama). Te Wāhipounamu is a national stronghold for some species including the scarlet mistletoe (Peraxilla colensoi), the shrubs Coprosma wallii, Pittosporum obcordatum (heart-leaved kohuhu), Melicytus flexuosus and Olearia lineata; and one of the only two remnant sites for the native broom Carmichaelia juncea. Many plants are endemic to Te Wāhipounamu, including in the gerera Celmisia, Chionochloa, Aciphylla. The endemism is greatest in the alpine zone, and amongst wetland species. Several other species meet their distribution limits in Te Wāhipounamu (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Assessment information
The greatest threat to the site's biodiversity values arises from predatory and browsing animals introduced from other land masses in last 200 years. These threaten its Gondwanic vegetation and unique bird fauna. Dealing with such a wide array of invasive species presents a significant challenge to the site's management and other parts of the New Zealand conservation community, particularly when funding is tight. Programmes aimed at avoiding new incursions and eradicating or controlling invasive species are effective within key habitats, but have been limited to targeted parts of the site due to funding constraints. Continual increases in visitor numbers and associated demands for intensified aircraft access threaten qualities of seclusion and tranquillity in popular parts of the site. Sound-scaping research is underway to help inform the management of this threat. The travel restrictions and decline in visitation brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 have reduced those pressures, at least temporarily and possibly in the medium term. This gives time to contemplate longer-term solutions to the problem. Climate change has already affected the extent and volumes of glacier ice, with significant impacts on landscapes and certain ecosystems.
Tourism/ visitors/ recreation
(High visitor numbers and tourist pressure)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
The World Heritage site is a major domestic and international destination and is a focal point for New Zealand’s burgeoning tourism industry which (prior to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020) contributed in the order of NZ$40 billion annually to New Zealand's economy (NZ$23 billion from domestic tourism, and NZ$17 billion international tourism) and made up 20% of NZ export earnings; international visitor growth had been about 4% per annum (NZ 2020a). A significant percentage of international tourists tends to focus on locations that are promoted by the tourism industry and which provide tourism services, whereas domestic visitors are the ones more inclined to venture into areas that are less developed. Major pressure points include: Doubtful and Milford Sounds; Great Walks – Milford, Kepler and Routeburn Tracks; helicopter flights and landings at the Fox, Franz and the Tasman Glaciers; and the Hooker Valley at the base of Mt Cook. The establishment of large private 'lodges' (Ultimate Hikes 2020) along the Routeburn Track was a major intrusion arising from a decision to increase the numbers of walkers permitted on commercial tours. As an example of potential sky-rocketing numbers, one regional plan stated 'it is estimated that Milford alone could see a significant increase in the number of visitors from the current level of 650,000 per year to 1.5 million in 10 years' (SORDS, 2016). A major conservation group has expressed alarm about the proposed 460 ha amenity area in the Westland Tai Poutini National Park for a gondola development next to the Franz Josef Glacier (Forest and Bird, 2018). Before the advent of COVID-19, the high numbers of visitors had increased management problems at some locations including: human waste management at day and overnight sites and tracks; increased aircraft demand – particularly related to recreational use and glacier landings; campsite use and management. A particular concern at some locations is the conflict between the value of the area for its seclusion and tranquillity, and the noise and proliferation of visitors generated by mechanised access, most notably aircraft and jetboats.
Approved helicopter and plane landing sites are listed in the national park management plans and conservation management strategies. There are also flight path protocols to minimise noise in the vicinity of the Milford Track, Westland Tai Poutini National Park, and in the Hooker Valley below Aoraki/Mount Cook. However, other than standard Civil Aviation regulations, which allow planes in ‘uninhabited areas’ to fly as low as 500 feet above the ground, there is little control (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
The rapid increase in tourism numbers has been exacerbating tension between user groups. An example of the tension was the dispute over the number of helicopter landings on the Ngapunatoru ice plateau inside the World Heritage site (FMC 2016, NZAC 2016, Wilderness Magazine 2016) and the resulting decision of the New Zealand Ombudsman (Ombudsman, 2018). This conflict as well as the impacts of noise on visitor experience and potentially on wildlife at some locations is acknowledged by the management and management plans have proposed means of dealing with the issue (DOC, 2018). The reductions in international tourist numbers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 will significantly ameliorate these impacts in the short to medium term. However, this is not a solution that is either desirable or necessarily long lasting.
Approved helicopter and plane landing sites are listed in the national park management plans and conservation management strategies. There are also flight path protocols to minimise noise in the vicinity of the Milford Track, Westland Tai Poutini National Park, and in the Hooker Valley below Aoraki/Mount Cook. However, other than standard Civil Aviation regulations, which allow planes in ‘uninhabited areas’ to fly as low as 500 feet above the ground, there is little control (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
The rapid increase in tourism numbers has been exacerbating tension between user groups. An example of the tension was the dispute over the number of helicopter landings on the Ngapunatoru ice plateau inside the World Heritage site (FMC 2016, NZAC 2016, Wilderness Magazine 2016) and the resulting decision of the New Zealand Ombudsman (Ombudsman, 2018). This conflict as well as the impacts of noise on visitor experience and potentially on wildlife at some locations is acknowledged by the management and management plans have proposed means of dealing with the issue (DOC, 2018). The reductions in international tourist numbers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 will significantly ameliorate these impacts in the short to medium term. However, this is not a solution that is either desirable or necessarily long lasting.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive browsing and predatory animals)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
New Zealand has been physically separated from other land masses for 80 million years, so its flora and fauna evolved independently and are at risk from invasive species, many of which are listed by the DOC (DOC, 2020d). The site's vegetation suffers from introduced browsing animals such as possums, chamois, deer and Himalayan Thar. The site's native birds suffer from introduced predators including rodents and mustelids. Impacts include loss of vegetation, localized extinctions, reductions in the range of key species, and a significant decline in the abundance of some indigenous biota, particularly native avifauna. The existing policies seek to prevent further incursions, and to control the range and impacts of non-native invasive species. The means of control are listed and discussed on DOC's website and include poisoning (particularly aerial drops of 1080 poison), baiting, trapping, culling and recreational hunting; research into enhanced methods of control is carried out through government partnerships with educational institutions (DOC, 2020e). Use of pesticides throughout the country, including within the World Heritage site, is notified to the public through an interactive map (DOC, 2020f). The overall program of pest control is entitled Tiakina Nga Manu, replacing the previous title 'Battle for our Birds' (DOC, 2020g). Many aspects of the program are detailed on this website, including outcomes, highlights, parliamentary oversight and monitoring. The use of 1080 poison attracts criticism and controversy (SAFE, 2019) but is strongly supported by the country's major nature-conservation group (Forest and Bird, 2020a) and has been backed by parliamentary inquiries and reports (PCE 2011, 2013a).
The case of the Himalayan tahr is complicated by the fact that it is treated as a game species. The Himalayan Thar [sic] Control Plan has been in place since 1993 and sets limits and intervention densities to trigger the culling of tahr. Cruz et al. (2014) described impacts on vegetation from tahr grazing. In 2018, an urgent cull was required because of a crisis in numbers (NewsHub, 2018). In autumn 2019 the population of tahr on public conservation lands was estimated to be about 35,000 (despite the target level of 10,000) and parts of the Westland Tai Poutini National Park described as ‘a tahr game park’ (Wilderness Mag, 2018). Since July 2019 more than 20,000 tahr have been culled by organised recreational hunters, commercial hunting, and DOC culling. The control program continues with frequent public updates (DOC, 2020b, 2020c) and DOC will need to maintain efforts to achieve the goals of the 1993 plan as recreational and commercial hunting have proven insufficient to control numbers adequately
Unless the measures referred to above are maintained and progressively increased, the indigenous biodiversity in those areas of the World Heritage site that are not being provided with pest control cannot have a positive long-term outlook. The government takes the threat of invasive animals very seriously and in 2016 announced the 'ambitious' goal of making New Zealand free of predators by 2050 (DOC, 2020h). In 2018, funding for control programs across the country was increased (DOC, 2018b).
The case of the Himalayan tahr is complicated by the fact that it is treated as a game species. The Himalayan Thar [sic] Control Plan has been in place since 1993 and sets limits and intervention densities to trigger the culling of tahr. Cruz et al. (2014) described impacts on vegetation from tahr grazing. In 2018, an urgent cull was required because of a crisis in numbers (NewsHub, 2018). In autumn 2019 the population of tahr on public conservation lands was estimated to be about 35,000 (despite the target level of 10,000) and parts of the Westland Tai Poutini National Park described as ‘a tahr game park’ (Wilderness Mag, 2018). Since July 2019 more than 20,000 tahr have been culled by organised recreational hunters, commercial hunting, and DOC culling. The control program continues with frequent public updates (DOC, 2020b, 2020c) and DOC will need to maintain efforts to achieve the goals of the 1993 plan as recreational and commercial hunting have proven insufficient to control numbers adequately
Unless the measures referred to above are maintained and progressively increased, the indigenous biodiversity in those areas of the World Heritage site that are not being provided with pest control cannot have a positive long-term outlook. The government takes the threat of invasive animals very seriously and in 2016 announced the 'ambitious' goal of making New Zealand free of predators by 2050 (DOC, 2020h). In 2018, funding for control programs across the country was increased (DOC, 2018b).
Habitat Shifting/ Alteration, Temperature extremes, Storms/Flooding
(Climate change)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Visual indications of the effects of climate change include measurable reductions in permanent ice fields and glaciers (eg Fox, Franz and Tasman). The Department of Conservation strongly acknowledges the significance of this threat, warning of higher temperatures, more extreme weather events, changing rainfall distribution, threats to particular species and ecosystems, and impacts on human activities within the World Heritage site (DOC, 2020i). Loss of glacier ice represents a significant impact on a major contributor to the site's Outstanding Universal Value; this has been well documented and studied (NIWA, 2018, Purdie et al., 2018, Purdie and Kerr, 2018) and is part of a global phenomenon (Bosson et al., 2019). Under current temperature projections, it is predicted that up to 50% of the indigenous alpine species may become endangered or extinct by 2100 because of shrubland and forest encroachment, habitat fragmentation, alien species invasion and direct and severe climate and weather-related events (McGlone et al., 2011). Impacts on aquatic environments such as lakes are poorly understood but could be significant (NIWA, 2020a). The sheer size, diversity and basically unmodified nature of the site provides resilience as well as maintaining connections across landscapes that allow plants and animals to move as they adapt to the inevitable disruptions caused by a changing climate.
Avalanches/ Landslides
(Hazards from natural events)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
The World Heritage site is subject to low-frequency high-magnitude events such as earthquakes, snow avalanches, landslides and flooding. These have caused deaths and damage or loss of property. In February 2019, a storm and landslips caused unprecedented damage to access roads and infrastructure at both the Franz and Fox glaciers. In February 2020. a significant storm event destroyed sections of the Milford and Routeburn Great Walks, and severely impacted the road from Te Anau to Piopiotahi Milford Sound. The popular Day Hike in the Hooker Valley was closed for several months when flooding events impacted the access road and essential bridges. Safety planning and management intervention have focused on reinstating major tourist access routes and facilities. Access to the Fox Glacier Te Moeka o Tuawe terminal has been closed due to a significant landslip which hasreducedthe hazard to visitors considerably but vigilance and on-going controls are required (State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003; UNEP-WCMC, 2011). Such events occur as a natural part of the geological phenomena that created the physical attributes that contribute to the site's Outstanding Universal Value, so must be expected. The concern is that their impacts on biotic attributes may be exacerbated by the impacts on vegetation of climate change and browsing animals.
Livestock Farming / Grazing
(Grazing licences)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Historic grazing licences exist on conservation land on the outer edge of the World Heritage site (eg Haast, South Westland river valleys). Freshwater systems, valley floor vegetation and forest margins are detrimentally affected by the grazing of domestic stock, particularly cattle, within conservation land contained within the site. Some of this grazing was guaranteed under New Zealand law when the Mt Aspiring National Park was established. Other areas have been subject to grazing licence renewals and there is an opportunity to limit the term of these by only renewing them for a short-term or not renewing them at all, to protect water and forest margins from further degradation. A recently granted grazing licence renewal in the Haast river is being reconsidered by the Department. (DOC, 2020j). Concerns exist that the extension of existing farming practices in this area could result in continued degradation of its intrinsic values, and diminish recreation and tourism opportunities by limiting access to the Haast riverbed (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Since 1990, the Government’s Nature Heritage Fund has been negotiating through business agreements the de-stocking of many of the highest-profile valleys within Mt Aspiring and Fiordland National Parks to return these areas to natural condition. De-stocked park areas include the Eglinton Valley, Dart Valley, Siberia-Wilkin-Makarora Valley and the Landsborough-Upper Haast Valleys. This process is ongoing. A new 13.5km Fiordland National Park boundary fence is nearing completion. This will prevent stock from Te Anau Downs Station accessing Fiordland National Park and the Eglinton River.
Since 1990, the Government’s Nature Heritage Fund has been negotiating through business agreements the de-stocking of many of the highest-profile valleys within Mt Aspiring and Fiordland National Parks to return these areas to natural condition. De-stocked park areas include the Eglinton Valley, Dart Valley, Siberia-Wilkin-Makarora Valley and the Landsborough-Upper Haast Valleys. This process is ongoing. A new 13.5km Fiordland National Park boundary fence is nearing completion. This will prevent stock from Te Anau Downs Station accessing Fiordland National Park and the Eglinton River.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive weeds)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
In many locations on the periphery of the World Heritage site native vegetation is threatened by introduced plant species. These include a variety of 'wilding conifers', lupin, broom, non-native grasses and buddleia. 'Wilding conifer' is the New Zealand term for introduced conifers that are spreading across the landscape – self-sown and unwanted. They include cedars, pines, firs, cypress, larches and spruces. Wilding conifers are spreading in eastern parts of the World Heritage site; they modify natural ecosystems such as tussock grassland so much that the unique New Zealand landscape is lost and native plants and animals are evicted or die (DOC, 2020k). Efforts to address this problem are shared by community groups and government with significant resources allocated in recent years. Freshwater weeds and marine exotic seaweeds in the fiords are also identified as a problem (DOC, 2020l).
Several catchments in the northern section of the World Heritage area have been invaded by herbaceous weeds and woody shrubs, that without intervention, can spread rapidly. Species such as tradescantia take hold of understoreys as a groundcover, preventing seedlings of native species to establish. Annual control of herbaceous and woody weed species is preventing further spread and in some places successfully reducing seed load for future years, however, use of new techniques, such as biological controls, are being trialled on species that are more resistant to chemical and manual control (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Several catchments in the northern section of the World Heritage area have been invaded by herbaceous weeds and woody shrubs, that without intervention, can spread rapidly. Species such as tradescantia take hold of understoreys as a groundcover, preventing seedlings of native species to establish. Annual control of herbaceous and woody weed species is preventing further spread and in some places successfully reducing seed load for future years, however, use of new techniques, such as biological controls, are being trialled on species that are more resistant to chemical and manual control (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
The proposed Haast–Hollyford Road, if ever constructed, would have a high impact on wilderness and aesthetics - but the chances of its ever proceeding are very low due to expense and opposition from the strong environmental NGO sector. The proposed water-export facility at Okoru is also unlikely to proceed in the foreseeable future. Potential threats that are much more significant include the possible spread of new pathogens and other invasive species. The effects of climate change will continue to intensify, with likely impacts on the distribution of vegetation and fauna. The warming climate will melt increasing quantities of ice, accelerating the retreat of glaciers and exposing more rock in landscapes once dominated by snowfields and ice caps.
Roads/ Railroads
(Road development)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
The Haast-Hollyford road is a long-standing proposal to link Haast via the Hollyford Valley to Milford Sound. Proposals for this road have been mooted since the since the 1870s. This threat posed by this 60-km road progressed in 2016 when the Southland District Council took a formal step to support the road (Otago Daily Times 2016). The road proposal has also been noted in a recent West Coast Economic Development Action Plan (West Coast Regional Council, 2017). Although the impact of the road, if constructed, would be high, the threat assessment is low because the likelihood of the road proceeding is also low due to the costs and natural hazards associated with the route.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Myrtle rust)
Outside site
Myrtle rust is a fungal disease that severely attacks plants in the myrtle family including pohutukawa, mānuka and rātā (Biosecurity NZ 2018). It is a very recent arrival and was detected in New Zealand in May 2017. To date there are no reported occurrences either in the World Heritage site, but is well established in the northern South Island and has been detected as far south as Greymouth. Myrtle rust spores are microscopic and can easily spread across large distances by wind, or via insects, birds, people, or machinery. The issue has been tightly monitored (DOC 2020m).
Dams/ Water Management or Use
(Water diversion)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
In 2017, the Westland Regional Council and Westland District Council approved a proposal (Alpine Pure, 2020) to construct and operate a water export facility on the boundary of Mt Aspiring National Park and in other areas within the World Heritage site. The proposed water intake is almost immediately adjacent to the national park boundary and the proposal shows the pipeline directly traverses through the Department of Conservation Haast Tokoeka kiwi sanctuary and the World Heritage site. According to a 2019 statement by an activist group, the lease to the easement was not renewed and the immediate threat has passed (OurActionStation, 2019).
Earthquakes/ Tsunamis, Avalanches/ Landslides, Erosion and Siltation/ Deposition
(Alpine fault rupture)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
The Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences (GNS) estimates that there is a 30-50 per cent chance of a large earthquake on the Alpine Fault in the next 50 years which could cause horizontal movement of up to eight metres. A rupture of the Alpine Fault could produce one of the biggest earthquakes since European settlement of New Zealand and would have a major impact on the natural landscape, flora and fauna of the World Heritage site. These factors indicate that the Alpine Fault is a globally significant geological structure which presents geographic hazards (GNS Science 2020).
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Didymo (Didymosphenia geminata))
Outside site
Didymo (commonly known as 'rock snot') is an invasive diatom that can choke streams, killing aquatic life and spoiling an area's aesthetics. It was discovered in Southland streams in the early 2000s and has been closely monitored (NIWA, 2014, DOC, 2013). Its spread throughout the World Heritage site would have very serious impacts.
The continual growth in visitor numbers and the associated proliferation of aircraft and jetboat operations have adversely affected qualities such as seclusion and tranquility in some of the site's most spectacular landscapes. The impacts of this growth on biodiversity values are largely unknown. A warming climate has already caused the retreat of the site's glaciers, including the most prominent ones on the West Coast, and a significant reduction in the volume of ice throughout the site. The frequency and severity of storm events impacting visitor related infrastructure appears to be increasing. The greatest threat to the biodiversity values that contribute to the site's Outstanding Universal Value arises from the severe impacts of invasive browsing and predatory animals on indigenous vegetation and fauna, particularly birds. Current programs aimed at avoiding new incursions and eradicating or controlling invasive species are effective in targeted areas, and these areas will expand with the Predator Free 2050 target. While more localized potential threats, such as extended infrastructure development and possible new roads, have the potential to compromise World Heritage values the likelihood of them proceeding is low. On the other hand, the cumulative impacts of climate change on the health of ecosystems combined with the effects of introduced animals and other exotic organisms are likely to be significant.
Management system
The Department of Conservation is the government agency responsible for day-to-day management. It is a world-class management body with a strong culture of dedication to protecting the natural assets under its care. There is no single management plan for the World Heritage site. Arrangements for its management are described in various documents prepared according to a 'conservation general policy' for the country, four 'conservation management strategies', and the management plans for the various national parks that the World Heritage site contains (DOC 2020o, 2020p). Conservation Management Strategies set out the general goals of management for the four regions with which the site overlaps. These 10-year plans are dated 2016 or 2010-2020 so are up to date (DOC 2020p). They specify outcomes which include protection of the site's Outstanding Universal Value and implementation of obligations of the Treaty of Waitangi. They are approved by the New Zealand Conservation Authority and statutory conservation boards advise on their implementation (DOC 2020q). General provisions applying to outdoor recreation, pest control, mechanised access are described for each region and its protected areas, including those parts of the World Heritage site within that region. The management plans for the four large national parks contained within the site (Westland Tai Poutini National Park, Aoraki/Mt Cook National Park, Mt Aspiring National Park, Fiordland National Park) have greater detail; one of these is current, two are under review, and one is overdue for review (2017) and has yet to have its review scheduled (DOC 2020p). Overall, the management system that applies to the Te Wähipounamu – South West New Zealand as a single World Heritage site is quite complex. However, it is backed by legislation, involves public participation, is largely up to date, specifically considers protection of the OUV of the site, and is implemented by a world-class conservation authority. By world standards, therefore, it is highly effective.
Effectiveness of management system
The World Heritage site is managed under statutory management strategies and plans (State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003; DOC 2020o, DOC 2020p). The Department of Conservation (DOC) is the government conservation agency responsible for day-to-day management. Conservation boards represent sectors of the community, including some expert opinion, and advise one implementation of conservation plans (DOC 2020q). As a result of significant opposition from conservation and recreational groups the review process for Westland Tai Poutini National Park is currently on hold. , DOC 2020r. The Aoraki/ Mt Cook National Park Management Plan (2004-2014) is currently in review, the Mount Aspiring National Park Management Plan (2011) is current, and the Fiordland National Park Management Plan is due for review ( 2017) with no review currently scheduled. ). A recent Supreme Court decision has refocused the Department in how it applies the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to statutory decision-making, particularly concessions to operate Public Conservation Land. In response to this judgment and wider Government direction, the Department is undertaking a programme of work across all of the business to improve best practice in meeting requirements of the Conservation Act in this regard (section 4). Although three of the four the national park management plans are either under review or in need of review, the management system generally works reasonably well in protecting the Outstanding Universal Value for which the site was inscribed.
Boundaries
The boundaries of the World Heritage site enclose a large area; there is a good-perimeter-to area ratio. The national parks contained within the site occupy over 1.7 million ha, or about two thirds of the World Heritage site, and provide a high level of protection to large areas of wilderness. Large additional areas are kept in a wild and natural state. However, outside the large national parks, the 'other conservation lands' on the fringe of the World Heritage site have very ragged edges. In 2007, the New Zealand government proposed the waters of the coastline of Fiordland as a potential extension to the World Heritage site on its tentative list (State Party of New Zealand, 2007) for World Heritage nomination; such an extension was recommended by IUCN at the time of the 1986 inscription and would be very welcome. Apart from that, the boundaries of the World Heritage site are effective at protecting the Outstanding Universal Value for which the site was inscribed.
Integration into regional and national planning systems
Plans for strategic and operational management of the World Heritage site are integrated with local and regional Council plans for protection, use and sustainable conservation of natural resources (State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003). Management of the site is covered by the four regional conservation strategies with which it overlaps (DOC 2020o, 2020p).
Relationships with local people
Management strategies and plans are prepared and implemented with wide consultation with the public (State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003; DOC 2020o, 2020p, 2020q). Planning documents contain the objective of meeting the requirements of the Treaty of Waitangi. A recent Supreme Court decision has refocused the Department in how it applies the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to statutory decision-making, particularly concessions to operate Public Conservation Land. In response to this judgment and wider Government direction, the Department is undertaking a programme of work across all of the business to improve best practice in meeting the requirements of the Conservation Act in this regard (section 4). Conservation boards that oversee implementation of plans have broad community representation (DOC 2020q). Relationships between park managers and some local councils that have a regional development focus can sometimes be tense, but the management system and New Zealand's democracy and institutions allow these conflicts to be expressed and, where possible, resolved.
Legal framework
The World Heritage site is protected under three major national legal statutes - the Conservation Act 1987, the National Parks Act 1980 and the Reserves Act 1977; the Wild Animal Control Act 1977 also comes into play (DOC 2020n). The management instruments that apply to the site are formulated under these laws. The site contains some areas that formerly had other land tenures such as forestry but which were allocated to DOC in 1987 as 'stewardship lands'; these are managed for conservation values (DOC 2020s) but without the same level of legislative protection that applies to national parks and nature reserves. A formal evaluation of stewardship lands was carried out in 2013 with recommendations for upgrade of status in many cases (PCE 2013b). The New Zealand Conservation Authority is leading a process to reclassify the protected status of selected high value conservation lands (PCE 2013b; State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003; DOC CMS 2010, 2016; DOC 2020r). New Zealand has independent institutions such as the Ombudsman and Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment that are able to investigate issues that affect the World Heritage site when such issues generate significant community concern (PCE 2011, 2013; Ombudsman 2014, 2016).
Law enforcement
Enforcement and public education are undertaken by the operational staff of DOC at its district offices, backed by a nationally coordinated compliance policy and a specialist enforcement and investigation team (DOC 2020s). The website lists examples of offences whose perpetrators have recently been investigated and prosecuted by authorities - the vast majority of these are on conservation lands outside the World Heritage site. In 2019, compliance and enforcement of regulations applying to tourist operators within national parks were increased, including those within the World Heritage site (DOC 2019b). Of 2445 activities checked in Fiordland 79% pertained to parking, 13% to guiding, and 6% arose from a joint government agency operation that targeted drivers on the Milford Road. 21% of the parking activities were non-compliant. 67% of the guiding activities were non-compliant. Investigations by the Ombudsman indicate that the management agency itself has not always abided by the provisions of management plans in approving developments (Ombudsman 2014, 2016).
Implementation of Committee decisions and recommendations
The last decision of the Committee requiring implementation was in 2004 (UNESCO, 2004). Performance under this topic therefore cannot be assessed for recent years.
Sustainable use
Extractive uses include recreational fishing, animal grazing under short-term grazing licenses/pastoral leases, sphagnum-moss collection, hunting of exotic mammal species, and traditional use of plants by Māori (State Party of New Zealand, 1990, 2003; DOC 2020p). Hunting of exotic mammals is highly regulated within the national parks contained within the World Heritage site, requiring a permit. Hunting of 'game species' of bird is generally prohibited except in the case of introduced Canadian geese. The major concern regarding the sustainability of the use of the World Heritage site applies to the high level of visitation and the associated concerns about development of infrastructure and loss of tranquility due to mechanised access such as jet boats and aircraft. The impact of this on biodiversity values is largely unknown (see threats section).
Sustainable finance
The New Zealand budget of 2018 significantly increased funding to the Department of Conservation, responsible for the management of the World Heritage site, raising its annual budget from $350 million to a projected $450 million by 2021, with specific funding increases for management of tourist numbers, for biodiversity enhancement, and for controlling and eradicating predators (DOC 2018b). Whether these welcome initiatives survive the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic remains to be seen. Numerous sources have expressed concern about DOC's ongoing ability to fully fund the control programs necessary to reduce the impact of browsing and predatory introduced species. Sponsorship of various pest-control programs by commercial partners such as Air New Zealand (ANZ 2020) may now be jeopardised due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the airline.
Staff capacity, training, and development
There are well-qualified staff at all levels of administration and management in the Department of conservation, responsible for the management of the World Heritage site. Numerous staff training opportunities in recent years can be seen online, ranging from fire-fighting to biosecurity and community education. The increased budget in 2018 provided for 'strengthening DOC's organisational capacity and capability' (DOC 2018b).
Education and interpretation programs
The Department of Conservation has excellent programs for interpretation and education. Many can be found online (DOC 2020t); others are available in hard copy at park visitor centres. In addition there are short nature walks in the World Heritage site with informative signage. There are excellent visitor centres at Aoraki / Mt Cook, Te Anau (Fiordland NP), Dunedin, Wanaka (Mt Aspiring NP), Queenstown (Mt Aspiring NP), Franz Josef and Haast (DOC 2020u). The programs do not however consistently give visibility to the World Heritage status of the area, focusing instead on national park designations.
Tourism and visitation management
The numbers of visitors and the demands for greater access to remote areas (particularly for sightseeing aircraft) and for increasing amounts of infrastructure constitute one of the main threats to the World Heritage site (see threats section). The process of closure and gradual re-opening of the country’s borders in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting decrease in numbers of visitors to the World Heritage site, provides an opportunity to reconsider and potentially re-frame relevant policies.
Monitoring
Monitoring programs exist for biodiversity, endangered birds, pest-animal numbers, tree canopy-cover, vegetation condition, glacier-ice volume, visitor numbers and aircraft over-flights (NIWA 2020a and 2020b, DOC 2020v). These programs are general in nature and not usually restricted to the World Heritage site itself. The status of attributes that contribute to the site's OUV is effectively assessed, but as a by-product of monitoring such attributes on a national basis. The research by Zero Invasive Predators (ZIP) in eradication techniques for possums, stoats and rats is centred within the WHA in Okarito.
Research
There is an extensive program of ongoing research, including good collaborative arrangements with national science agencies. Research programs cover climate change, biodiversity and invasive species (DOC 2020 / search 'research', NIWA 2020b). These are generally national programs that do not cover the World Heritage site explicitly or exclusively but cover the key issues and attributes that affect maintenance of its OUV.
The World Heritage site is managed not as a single entity but under a set of interlocking and overlapping plans. While this is complex, it nevertheless works as the Department of Conservation, responsible for the management of the site, is a world-class management agency and management and protection are underpinned by a very strong legal framework with active participation in the site's management - both formally and informally - by the NGO sector, Māori (indigenous people), scientific experts and institutional watchdogs on the government. The Government of New Zealand recently provided a very significant boost to funding of conservation across the country, with direct benefits to the World Heritage site and the programs necessary to maintain its OUV. Programs for research, monitoring, staff training and education are world class. Problems arise from the conflict between maintaining qualities such as remoteness and tranquility versus tourism development in the form of physical infrastructure and aircraft flight paths. However, overall, by world standards, the management of Te Wāhipounamu – South West New Zealand is generally very effective.
Assessment of the effectiveness of protection and management in addressing threats outside the site
Highly Effective
The site's values are well-buffered from many external influences because of the remoteness of the site's core and its rugged topography. The major threat arising from outside of the site is the creeping spread of invasive organisms such as wilding conifers, didymo and predatory and browsing mammals. The management agency has an excellent collaborative relationship with land and managers outside the World Heritage site, which minimises conflict and enables threats to be jointly addressed. The Department of Conservation supervises pest-control programs both inside and outside the site, enabling effective coordination.
Best practice examples
Statutory Conservation boards advise on the implementation of New Zealand's conservation management strategies and plans. Board membership reflects major interests in the community, such as indigenous rights, science, conservation, recreation and tourism (DOC 2020q). This is an inclusive and effective way of achieving broad community support for the measures necessary to protect Outstanding Universal Value and serves as an excellent example to other jurisdictions that manage World Heritage site that are large and diverse.
New Zealand's independent watchdogs on government, such as the Ombudsman and Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, play an invaluable role in reporting on issues that have become contentious within the community, or investigating accusations against the government manager of the site (Ombudsman 2014, 2016; PCE 2011, 2013a).
New Zealand's independent watchdogs on government, such as the Ombudsman and Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, play an invaluable role in reporting on issues that have become contentious within the community, or investigating accusations against the government manager of the site (Ombudsman 2014, 2016; PCE 2011, 2013a).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Te Wāhipounamu – South West New Zealand was inscribed on the World Heritage List under all four natural-heritage criteria. At present, the site's Outstanding Universal Value faces threats from three main sources - climate change, the impacts of invasive species on flora and fauna and demands for mechanised access from what has been an increasing number of visitors until 2020. Wilderness (part of the site's OUV under criterion vii) has been degraded by tourism infrastructure and the intrusions of noisy aircraft in key parts of the World Heritage site. Overall, however, the site's great size and rugged terrain provide natural buffering from the impacts of development. The warming climate has melted up to 30% of glacier ice in the last four decades, leading to substantial changes in parts of the landscape and in the land-shaping processes for which the site was listed under criterion viii. The most critical impacts on the site's OUV come from invasive species. Browsing mammals such as deer and Himalayan Tahr degrade the site's flora. Introduced predators such as rats, stoats and possums kill the site's birds. Other invasive organisms threaten the integrity of the site's aquatic ecosystems. The Department of Conservation has tackled these threats with determination and professionalism. The success of recovery programs for critical native species and of efforts to control biological invaders depends on the support of the community and the maintenance of funding. If these requirements are satisfied, there are grounds for optimism.
Additional information
Outdoor recreation and tourism
The World Heritage site is a nationally and internationally renowned destination for visitors, including tourists, enjoying outdoor recreation in a wilderness setting. The site includes three of New Zealand's Great Walks, many other well-maintained tracks and nature trails, and is the prime venue for non-commercial wilderness recreation enjoyed by a large number of New Zealanders.
The establishment of new tourist infrastructure and landing sites and flight paths for commercial tourist aircraft has degraded the wilderness experience in several key areas. Climate change has reduced the volume and extent of ice, leading to contraction of ice caps and associated glaciers, with documented impacts on opportunities for alpinism. The frequency of significant storm events which impact on visitor related infrastructure appear to be increasing. Invasive species have significant ecological impacts but adverse effects on the scenery that attracts visitors are generally subtle.
Sacred natural sites or landscapes,
Sacred or symbolic plants or animals,
Cultural identity and sense of belonging
The site holds deep cultural and traditional values to local Māori (Ngāi Tahu) people, as a taonga, as a source of pounamu (nephrite jade), and for plant and animal products taken for traditional uses.
Some Ngāi Tahu people have expressed opposition to some tourist developments. Climate change and invasive species affect the health of key landscapes and natural attributes. A recent Supreme Court decision has refocused the Department in how it applies the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to statutory decision-making, In response to this judgment and wider Government direction, the Department is undertaking a programme of work to improve best practice in this regard.
Wilderness and iconic features
The site contains four gazetted Wilderness Areas (Glaisnock, Pembroke, Olivine, Hooker-Landsborough) and one proposed Wilderness Area (Poteriteri). Wilderness (large natural areas with a core remote from modern human access routes and settlement) occurs throughout other large parts of the site.
New flight paths and landing sites for commercial sightseeing aircraft have degraded the wilderness experience in key parts of the site. The loss of ice due to climate change has altered what would otherwise be pristine landscapes. The essential programs necessary to control invasive species bring their own intrusions, such as aircraft used for aerial baiting programs.
Carbon sequestration,
Water provision (importance for water quantity and quality)
The site provides reliable water supply and protection of water catchments for much of the south-east of the South Island. Maintenance of the ecosystem's vegetation by controlling introduced browsers is a vital part of maintaining this service. Failure to appreciate ecosystem services carries a risk of deterioration of natural capital, with consequences including increased flood risk, reduced whitebait catches, impoverished tourism experience and damage to New Zealand's brand. The large tracts of natural forest sequester a significant amount of carbon from the atmosphere. The Department of Conservation has recognised the economic value of these ecosystem services and taken steps to prevent further decline in the health of ecosystems and the services they provide.
Impacts of climate change in degrading water catchments carry through to ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration and provision of water.
Direct employment,
Tourism-related income,
Provision of jobs
This World Heritage site is one of New Zealand's major tourist attractions. Tourism provided $41 billion to New Zealand's economy in 2018-19.
Over exploitation risks damaging New Zealand's brand. Climate change has reduced the extent of glacial ice, impacting on scenery and key tourist attractions. Invasive species have a high ecological impact but their impacts on scenery and therefore tourist assets are more subtle.
The World Heritage site is the venue for a wide range of outdoor recreational pursuits, including wilderness experiences, and has many globally-renowned tourism attractions. It protects a huge expanse of wild and rugged terrain and provides environmental services such as catchment protection and carbon sequestration. The site protects areas of cultural significance to the Maori (Ngai Tahu) people.
№ | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Department of Conservation | Himalayan Tahr Control The Himalayan Tahr Control Plan 1993 sets out the objectives for management of this species within set zones within Te Wahipounamu. This includes the southern and northern exclusion zones. Catchment-scale control programs and associated monitoring are in place. Reporting to the Conservation Boards and the NZ Conservation Authority is carried out on an annual basis. |
https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/conservation/threats-and-impacts/animal-pests/tahr/thar-plan-1993.pdf
https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/science-publications/conservation-publications/threats-and-impacts/animal-pests/himalayan-thar-control-plan-1993/
|
2 | Department of Conservation | Alpine Fault Rupture zone Work is occurring across Te Wahipounamu in regard to natural hazards in the landscape, especially focused on the risks to residents and visitors from the Alpine Fault Rupture zone. This work is being led by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences (GNS), Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management (MCDEM), the three Regional Councils and the Department of Conservation. The objective is to have an integrated readiness and response plan for key sites across Te Wahipounamu. |
https://www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Learning/Science-Topics/Earthquakes/Major-Faults-in-New-Zealand/Alpine-Fault
https://www.orc.govt.nz/managing-our-environment/natural-hazards/earthquakes/alpine-fault
|
3 | The Pomona Island Charitable Trust | Pomona Island restoration This community-based conservation project is restoring the biodiversity on Pomona Island, Lake Manapōuri. Pomona Island is situated in Lake Manapōuri within Fiordland National Park, in Te Wāhipounamu - South West New Zealand World Heritage Area. At 262 ha, it is the largest island in Lake Manapōuri and is the largest inland island in New Zealand. Like many areas of Fiordland, the biodiversity on the island has suffered from the introduction of mammals such as stoats, possums, deer, rats and mice. The Pomona Island Charitable Trust, set up in 2005, is working to eradicate these pests from the island and restore it to its natural state for future generations to enjoy. |
https://www.doc.govt.nz/our-work/pomona-island-restoration/
|
4 | NIWA | Recording and measurement of glacial ice |
https://niwa.co.nz/videos/glaciers-dont-lie
|
5 | Department of Conservation | Monitoring and translocation projects are conducted each year for endangered species in Fiordland. |
https://www.doc.govt.nz/our-work/fiordland-species-monitoring-and-translocations
|
References
№ | References |
---|---|
1 |
ANZ 2020. Air New Zealand. In the community [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://niwa.co.nz/freshwater-and-estuaries/freshwater-and-…
|
2 |
Alpine Pure 2020. Alpine Pure Company Website [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. http://www.alpinepure.com/
|
3 |
Biosecurity NZ 2018. Biosecurity New Zealand. Pest and disease search: Myrtle rust [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. http://www.mpi.govt.nz/protection-and-response/finding-and-…
|
4 |
Bosson, J.‐B., Huss, M., & Osipova, E. (2019). Disappearing World Heritage glaciers as a keystone of nature conservation in a changing climate. Earth's Future, 7, 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001139
|
5 |
Burns et al. 2017. Conservation status of New Zealand amphibians 2017 [online]. NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 25. Rhys J. Burns, Ben D. Bell, Amanda Haigh, Phillip Bishop, Luke Easton, Sally Wren, Jennifer Germano, Rodney A. Hitchmough, Jeremy R. Rolfe and Troy Makan. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/science-and-…
|
6 |
Cruz J., Thomson C., Parkes J., June 2014, Impact of Himalayan Tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) on snow tussocks in the Southern Alps, New Zealand, Landcare Research. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/conservation…
|
7 |
DOC 1993. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Himalayan Thar Control Plan [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/conservation…
|
8 |
DOC 2013. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Devastated: Didymo confirmed in remote Fiordland [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2013/devastated…
|
9 |
DOC 2017. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Briefing to the incoming minister for conservation [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/about-doc/ro…
|
10 |
DOC 2018a. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Draft Aoraki / Mt Cook Draft Management Plan 2018 [online]. Viewed 25 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/contentassets/7604d89909144a0b9e0bc…
|
11 |
DOC 2018b. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. DOC's Budget 2018 explained [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/budget-2018/docs-budget-2018-e…
|
12 |
DOC 2019a. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. DOC pauses national park management plan reviews, 4 February 2019 [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2019/doc-pauses…
|
13 |
DOC 2019b. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. DOC steps up tourism industry compliance and enforcement [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2019/doc-steps-…
|
14 |
DOC 2020a. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. DOC's response to COVID-19 [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020 [online]. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/issues/covid-19/
|
15 |
DOC 2020b. NZ Department of Conservation. Himalayan tahr control to benefit native plants, 25 February 2020 [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2020-media-rele…
|
16 |
DOC 2020c. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Himalayan tahr control operations [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/parks-and-recreation/things-to-do/h…
|
17 |
DOC 2020d. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Animal Pests A-Z [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/animal-pes…
|
18 |
DOC 2020e. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Our pest control methods [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/methods-of…
|
19 |
DOC 2020f. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Pesticide summaries [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://maps.doc.govt.nz/mapviewer/index.html?viewer=pestic…
|
20 |
DOC 2020g. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Tiakina Ngā Manu [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/our-work/tiakina-nga-manu/
|
21 |
DOC 2020h. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Predator Free 2050 [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/predator-f…
|
22 |
DOC 2020i. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Climate change risks to conservation [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/our-work/climate-change-and-conserv…
|
23 |
DOC 2020j. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Haast grazing licence granted, but with tight conditions [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2020-media-rele…
|
24 |
DOC 2020k. NZ Department of Conservation /Te Papa Alawhai. Wilding conifers [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/weeds/comm…
|
25 |
DOC 2020l. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Weeds that pose serious threats to New Zealand [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/weeds/comm…
|
26 |
DOC 2020m. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Myrtle rust: Biosecurity threats [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/diseases/m…
|
27 |
DOC 2020n. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. National park management plans [online]. Accessed 29 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/our-policies-and-plans/sta…
|
28 |
DOC 2020o. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Our policies and plans [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/our-policies-and-plans/
|
29 |
DOC 2020p. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Statutory planning status report [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/our-policies-and-plans/sta…
|
30 |
DOC 2020q. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. What conservation boards do [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/statutory-and-advisory-bod…
|
31 |
DOC 2020r. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Managing conservation stewardship land [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/our-role/managing-conserva…
|
32 |
DOC 2020s. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Compliance and law enforcement [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/our-role/compliance-and-la…
|
33 |
DOC 2020t. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Conservation education [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/get-involved/conservation-education/
|
34 |
DOC 2020u. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Visitor Centres [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/footer-links/contact-us/visitor-cen…
|
35 |
DOC 2020v. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. DOC's monitoring and reporting system [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/our-work/monitoring-and-reporting-s…
|
36 |
DOC 2020w. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. New Zealand Threat Classification Series [online]. Accessed 1 May 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/science-publications/serie…
|
37 |
DOC 2020x. NZ Department of Conservation / Te Papa Alawhai. Mining [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/get-involved/apply-for-permits/mini…
|
38 |
Dunn et al. 2017. Conservation status of New Zealand freshwater fishes, 2017 [online]. NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 24. Nicholas R. Dunn, Richard M. Allibone, Gerard P. Closs, Shannan K. Crow, Bruno O. David, Jane M. Goodman, Marc Griffiths, Daniel C. Jack, Nicholas Ling, Jonathan M. Waters and Jeremy R. Rolfe. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/science-and-…
|
39 |
FMC 2016. Federated Mountain Clubs. Milford Visitors Deserve Better, April 2016 [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://fmc.org.nz/2016/04/11/milford-tourism-deserves-bett…
|
40 |
Forest and Bird 2018. Proposed national park plan breaks law [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://www.forestandbird.org.nz/resources/proposed-nationa…
|
41 |
Forest and Bird 2020a. Forest and Bird Te Reo o Te Taiau. Frequently Asked Questions about 1080 [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.forestandbird.org.nz/resources/frequently-asked…
|
42 |
GNS Science 2020. Alpine Fault [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Learning/Science-Topics/Earthqu…
|
43 |
Hutching, G. and Potton C., editors. 1987. Forests, Fiords and Glaciers, New Zealand’s World Heritage. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand. Wellington.
|
44 |
IUCN 1990. Technical evaluation of the Te Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand World Heritage nomination [online]. Accessed 25-30 April 2020. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/551/documents/
|
45 |
McGlone M., Walker, S. 2011, Potential effects of climate change on New Zealand’s terrestrial biodiversity and policy recommendations for mitigation, adaptation and research, Science for Conservation Report 312, Department of Conservation, Wellington. https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/sfc…
|
46 |
NIWA 2018. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research / Taihoro Nukurangi. Glaciers don't lie [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://niwa.co.nz/videos/glaciers-dont-lie
|
47 |
NIWA 2020a. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research / Taihoro Nukurangi. We don’t know much about lakes and climate change, says researcher [online]. 5 March 2020. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://niwa.co.nz/news/we-dont-know-much-about-lakes-and-c…
|
48 |
NIWA 2020b. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research / Taihoro Nukurangi. Environmental information [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://niwa.co.nz/environmental-information
|
49 |
NIWA 2020c. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research / Taihoro Nukurangi. What is climate change and why is it happening? [online] Accessed 1 May 2020. https://niwa.co.nz/natural-hazards/hazards/climate-change
|
50 |
NZ 2020a. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. HIKINA WHAKATUTUKI. Key tourism statistics [online]. Accessed 25-30 April 2020. https://www.mbie.govt.nz/dmsdocument/3438-key-tourism-stati…
|
51 |
NZAC 2016. New Zealand Alpine Club. Fiordland aircraft impact study in need of a research programme, November 2016 [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://alpineclub.org.nz/2016/11/
|
52 |
NewsHub 2018. NewsHub. Urgent cull of South Island's Himalayan tahr population ordered by Conservation Minister [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/lifestyle/2020/04/how-to-get…
|
53 |
Ombudsman 2014. New Zealand Ombudsman. Investigation of DOC renewal of Routeburn Track concession [online]. Accessed 29 April 2020. https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/sites/default/files/201…
|
54 |
Ombudsman 2018. Investigation into aircraft landing limits on Ngapunatoru Plateau [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/resources/investigation…
|
55 |
Otago Daily Times 2016. ‘Road would cost closer to $2b —opponents’, Otago Daily Times 2 July, 2016 [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/west-coast/road-would-cost-cl…
|
56 |
OurActionStation 2019. To: The House of Representatives: Say no to a pipeline through a Kiwi sanctuary by Mount Aspiring National Park [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://our.actionstation.org.nz/petitions/say-no-to-a-pipe…
|
57 |
PCE 2011. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. Evaluating the Use of 1080: predators, poisons and silent forests – Wellington New Zealand [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.pce.parliament.nz/media/1294/evaluating-the-use…;
|
58 |
PCE 2013a. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. Update Report 2013, Evaluating the Use of 1080: predators, poisons and silent forests [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.pce.parliament.nz/media/1229/1080-update-report…
|
59 |
PCE 2013b. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. Investigating the Future of Conservation: the case of Stewardship Land – Wellington New Zealand [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.pce.parliament.nz/media/1247/stewardship-land-w…
|
60 |
PCE 2017. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, May 2017 Taonga of a nation: Saving New Zealand’s birds [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.pce.parliament.nz/publications/taonga-of-an-isl…
|
61 |
Purdie H., Kerr T. 2018. Aoraki Mount Cook: Environmental Change on an Iconic Mountaineering Route, Mountain Research and Development, 38(4) : 364-379, International Mountain Society URL: https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00042.1
|
62 |
Purdie et al. 2018. Heather Purdie, Brian Anderson, Andrew Mackintosh & Wendy Lawson (2018) Revisiting glaciological measurements on Haupapa/Tasman Glacier, New Zealand, in a contemporary context, Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 100:4, 351-369, DOI:10.1080/04353676.2018.1522958
|
63 |
RNZ 2016. National parks under strain from growing visitor numbers [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/aud…
|
64 |
Robertson et al. 2016. Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2016 [online]. NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 19. Hugh A. Robertson, Karen Baird, John E. Dowding, Graeme P. Elliott, Rodney A. Hitchmough, Colin M. Miskelly, Nikki McArthur, Colin F.J. O’Donnell, Paul M. Sagar, R. Paul Scofield and Graeme A. Taylor. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/science-and-…;
|
65 |
SAFE 2019. 1080 poisoning an animal welfare catastrophe for New Zealand, 9 January 2019 [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://safe.org.nz/1080-poisoning-an-animal-welfare-catast…
|
66 |
SORDS 2016. Southland Regional Development Strategy, November 2016 [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. http://www.sords.co.nz/site/assets/files/1/sords_action_pla…
|
67 |
State Party of New Zealand (1990). World Heritage Nomination of Te Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand.
|
68 |
State Party of New Zealand (2003). Periodic Report for Te Wahipounamu - South West New Zealand. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/551/documents/
|
69 |
State Party of New Zealand (2007). New Zealand Tentative List / Waters and seabed of Fiordland (Te Moana O Atawhenua) [online]. Accessed 30 April 2020. https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5121/
|
70 |
Timaru Herald 2019. Aoraki/Mt Cook National Park management plan rubbished, 30 January 2019 [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald/news/110250677/aoraki…
|
71 |
UNEP/WCMC 2011. Datasheet for Te Wahipounamu-South West New Zealand World Heritage Property. http://world-heritage-datasheets.unep-wcmc.org/datasheet/ou…
|
72 |
UNESCO (2004). Te Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand, State of Conservation Report [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/1409/
|
73 |
Ultimate Hikes 2020. Private lodges [online]. Accessed 26 April 2020. https://www.ultimatehikes.co.nz/multi-day-guided-walks/rout…
|
74 |
West Coast Regional Council 2017. Strategic case for the Haast to Hollyford Road [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. http://www.wcrc.govt.nz/our-council/news/Pages/West-Coast-E…)
|
75 |
Wilderness Magazine 2016. Ngapunatoru heli landings ‘Nonsense on stilts – again’ [online]. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.wildernessmag.co.nz/ngapunatoru-heli-landings-n…
|
76 |
Wilderness Magazine 2018. Tahr control labelled a ‘total failure’ and could cost millions, 14 September 2018 [online]. Accessed 25 April 2020. https://www.wildernessmag.co.nz/tahr-control-labelled-total…
|
77 |
de Lange, P.J.; Rolfe, J.R.; Barkla, J.W.; Courtney, S.P.; Champion, P.D.; Perrie, L.R.; Beadel, S.M.; Ford, K.A.; Breitwieser,I.; Schonberger, I.; Hindmarsh-Walls, R.; Heenan, P.B.; Ladley, K. 2018: Conservation status of New Zealand indigenous vascular plants, 2017 [online]. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 22. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 82 p. Accessed 2 May 2020. https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/science-and-…
|