Kilimanjaro National Park

Country
Tanzania (United Republic of)
Inscribed in
1987
Criterion
(vii)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
At 5,895 m, Kilimanjaro is the highest point in Africa. This volcanic massif stands in splendid isolation above the surrounding plains, with its snowy peak looming over the savannah. The mountain is encircled by mountain forest. Numerous mammals, many of them endangered species, live in the park. © UNESCO
© IUCN/Elena Osipova

Summary

2025 Conservation Outlook

Finalised on
11 أكتوبر 2025
Good with some concerns
The World Heritage property occupies the higher elevation parts of the Kilimanjaro National Park (above the tree line at 2,700 m). It is an area that is ‘buffered’ from the intensively cultivated lower slopes of the mountain by a wide belt of protected forests. This ensures that the World Heritage site remains relatively remote and unaffected by human activities. However, increasing populations along the park's fringes are placing increasing pressures on the site's natural resources, which requires additional efforts to effectively engage local communities in conservation efforts and address increasing poverty levels. The most significant threat to the scenic value (for which it was inscribed) is climate change. The mountain’s glaciers are melting fast, and are expected to disappear altogether within a couple of decades. Increasing wildfires affect ecological functioning and the characteristic altitudinal zonation of vegetation communities will probably shift in the long term as the climate warms. Furthermore, the spread of invasive alien species is likely to increase. Maintaining the site’s values will require long-term protection of the entire ecosystem, as the ecological resilience of the property and its ability to adapt to a warmer climate, will require landscape connectivity with adjacent mid-elevation forests and other habitats at lower altitudes. Above all, the proposed cable car project poses a considerably threat to the OUV of the property, which if approved, may significantly alter this site's conservation outlook. The management authorities' efforts to address wildfire and strengthen law enforcement are very welcome, as is the national push to prioritise addressing environmental challenges through national policies and legislation. This has the potential to improve the integration of the site's protection into broader regional targets. However, there are various aspects in need of improvement, especially concerning the engagement of local communities in forest protection activities and decision-making processes, the coordination between administrative bodies, the demarcation and awareness raising of World Heritage site boundaries, improved staff capacity and reduction in illegal natural resource use.

Current state and trend of VALUES

High Concern
The scenic values of the site, which are intimately linked to the occurrence of glaciers and snowfields close to the Equator, are being compromised as the ice melts. The glaciers are expected to disappear altogether from Kilimanjaro within a couple of decades. The glacier area has declined to less than 20 % of it’s extent in 1900 with a remaining glacier surface area on Kilimanjaro of 0.98 km2. A four-fold increase in visitor numbers since the property was listed is creating the demand for further infrastructure and problems associated with litter and sanitation, all of which diminishes the outstanding natural beauty of the place. The proposed cable car project in particular, if approved, would dramatically alter the visual aesthetics of the property and lead to considerable visitor pressure. The already started construction of a new climbing route will have similar effects. The most pressing issue facing Mt. Kilimanjaro’s vegetation zones remains the increasing fire risk on the mountain, resulting in shifts of vegetation belts, tree line and affecting the water balance.

Overall THREATS

High Threat
Although the biodiversity values of the site face a multitude of high threats, the values for which the site was inscribed for under the WH Convention are threatened mostly by climate change and fire, which affect the spectacular mountain scenery, including the vegetation zones for which the site was inscribed. Mount Kilimanjaro has already lost 50% of its former forest cover, which impacts cloud condensation levels and leads to gradual shrinking of the cloud zone. This change in regional climate conditions is expected to cause the disappearance of the glaciers within a few decades, a general shift in vegetation zones and an increasing spread of invasive alien species. In the long term, this is likely to reduce the area of the unique Afro-alpine communities. Uncontrolled fire is a frequent threat during drier periods, often human-induced, which is being exacerbated by climate change, destroying extensive areas of forest and heath and altering their ecological roles and functioning. The site covers the upper reaches of the mountain above the closed forest line, so threats to the forest cover on the mid-level and lower slopes have an indirect effect on the property. Illegal hunting and collection of some forest products are common along the national park borders, and expected to increase with the growing population of surrounding villages. Tourism pressures are increasing, creating associated problems with litter, water pollution and soil erosion. With the potential development of a cable car along the Machame Route, this threat may be exacerbated in the future, further impacting the scenic beauty of the site.

Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT

Mostly Effective
The remote location and rugged terrain of the property ensures a high degree of natural protection against unsustainable resource use, limiting the need for management intervention. However, with the increasing human population on the peripheries and the enhanced impacts from climate change, more active and adaptive management responses are required. Although a current management plan is in place, there are various aspects in need of improvement, especially concerning the engagement of local communities in forest protection activities and decision-making processes, the coordination between administrative bodies, the demarcation and awareness raising of site boundaries, improved staff capacity and reduction in illegal natural resource use. The efforts at the national level to prioritise tackling environmental challenges and establish a coordinated response in this regard, for example through the 2021 National Environmental Policy is welcomed, as is the strong legal framework and enhanced law enforcement efforts at the site level. A concern is that TANAPA no longer retains revenue collections as it did in the past. However the impact on the timeliness and flexibility of funding allocation for park management needs remains to be seen. Furthermore, issues regarding insufficient human capacity hindering implementation of policy frameworks remain.

Full assessment

Click the + and - signs to expand or collapse full accounts of information under each topic. You can also view the entire list of information by clicking Expand all on the top left.

Description of values

Africa’s highest peak and one of the world’s largest free-standing mountains

Criterion
(vii)
Kilimanjaro is not only the highest mountain in Africa, but also one of the largest volcanoes in the world (IUCN, 1987; UNEP-WCMC, 2012; World Heritage Committee, 2010). It stands isolated on the surrounding plains of East Africa, rising 4,877 m above the plains so that its summit attains an elevation of 5,895 m asl. Its massive bulk covers a land area of almost 4,000 km2 (World Heritage Committee, 2010).

Spectacular mountain scenery

Criterion
(vii)
The property includes some of Africa’s most spectacular mountain scenery, including Africa’s highest point (Uhuru Peak, 5,895m), remnant glaciers, and a number of lakes, waterfalls and bog-filled valleys. It is a relatively young extinct volcano, with three main peaks, Kibo, Mawenzi and Shira (World Heritage Committee, 2010). The central area of the youngest peak (Kibo) consists of two concentric craters with a 350m-deep ash pit in the centre and some spectacular ice fields and glaciers around the rim. The mountain has five main vegetation zones from the lowest to the highest point: Lower slopes, montane forest, heath and moorland, alpine desert and summit. The whole mountain including the montane forest belt is very rich in species, in particular mammals, many of them endangered species. For this combination of features but mostly its height, its physical form and snow cap and its isolation above the surrounding plains, Mount Kilimanjaro is considered an outstanding example of a superlative natural phenomenon.
Rare and endemic species
By comparison with Africa’s other high mountains, e.g. Mt. Kenya, Kilimanjaro is richer in species numbers (e.g. with over 3000 vascular plant species) (Hemp 2006b) due to a very wet climate on its southern slope (Hemp 2006c; Hemp & Hemp 2024). Especially the montane forest belt is very rich in species, in particular mammals, many of them endangered species (World Heritage Committee, 2010). Africa’s tallest trees (Entandrophragma excelsum) have been discovered in a river gorge just inside the national park limits together with another rare and critically endangered tree species (Garcinia tanzaniensis) (Hemp et al., 2017). Kilimanjaro is part of the Kenyan Mountains Endemic Bird Area (EBA), and a Birdlife Important Bird Area (IBA) (Baker and Baker, 2002). It supports four species of bird that are considered globally Vulnerable and two species that are near-threatened, as well as three of the restricted-range species of the Kenyan Mountains EBA. The World Heritage property does not cover any of the forested habitats where most of the mammal, bird and plant biodiversity is concentrated but it does include the more unique ecological communities of the heaths, moorlands and high-altitude deserts. These areas support some notable endemic species including the giant groundsel (Dendrosenecio kilimanjari) and the giant Lobelia (Lobelia deckenii). Furthermore, there is a high degree of endemism of Orthoptera on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Hemp C, 2005). The Kili Project identified over 8,000 species of insects, many of which were new to science (TANAPA, 2023).
Africa's highest forest
The subalpine cloud forest composed mainly of the giant heather (Erica trimera) represents the highest forest in Africa at an elevation of about 4000 m a.s.l. (Hemp, 2006).
Notable fauna diversity
The entire mountain along with the montane wooded area belt, is inhabited by myriads of animal species totalling 140 mammals, including 7 primates, 25 carnivores, 25 antelopes and 24 species of bat. Above the tree line at least seven of the larger mammal species were recorded. Some of them may, however, be residents of the montane wooded area habitat. The eastern tree hyrax (Dendrohyrax Validus) (VU), grey duiker (Sylvicapra Grimmia), and eland (Tragalaphus Oryx), which occur in the moorland, are the most frequently encountered mammals above the treelined, with bushbuck T. scriptus and red forest duiker (Cephalophus Natalensis) occasionally moving out of the forest into the moorland and grassland, and central African savanna buffalo (Syncerus caffer). Between the Namwai and Tarakia Rivers, an estimated 220 elephants (Loxodonta Africana) (VU) are found, with some on the upper slopes. Although golden moles (Chrysochloridae) are missing, insectivores and rodents can be found above the tree line, especially during times of population expansion. The montane woods are home to three primate species: the blue monkey, the eastern black-and-white colobus monkey, and the eastern black-and-white colobus monkey. Leopards (Panthera pardus) and some of the species listed above are among the mammals found, as are Colobus guereza caudatus and bushbaby Galago species. Abbots duiker (Cephalophus spadix) (EN) is only found on Mount Kilimanjaro and a few nearby ranges. Chanler's mountain reedbuck (Redunca fulvorufula chanleri) (VU) is probably gone, while eastern black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) (CR) is now extinct in the area. The changing weather patterns have impacted animal distributions as well as terrain characteristics (Altmann et. al. 2002). Changes in migration behaviour and population dynamics of large animals has been observed in the forests of Mt. Kilimanjaro (Mjema et al. 2023).
High diversity of ecosystems
Mount Kilimanjaro features a diverse environment, particularly in terms of flora, due to the mountain's wide variety of altitude and rainfall. Mt. Kilimanjaro is therefore especially important because of the diversity of its ecosystems (Mjema et al. 2023), including submontane forest, lower to middle montane forest and upper montane forest at different elevation zones (Hemp 2006c). This supports the high variety in structure and composition of the vegetation and the rich fauna described above.
Evidence of volcanic eruption
The mountain is composed of both shield and volcanic types of eruption. Different flows have produced a variety of different rock types over time. The predominant rock types on Shira and Mawenzi are trachybasalts. The later lava flows on Kibo manifest a gradual change from trachyandesite to nephelinite. Several intrusions such as the massive radial and concentric dyke-swarms on Mawenzi and the Shira Ridge, and groups of nearly 250 parasitic cones formed chiefly from cinder and ash are also present. Evidence of past glaciation is manifested on all three peaks, with morainic debris found to exist as low as 3,600m (Minja, 2014).
Watertower
Kilimanjaro is an important water catchment area for southern Kenya and northern Tanzania, on which several million people depend. According to the distribution of the main precipitation, the forest belt is the most important catchment area, supplying over 500 million tons of water annually. Another key factor is the function of the high montane and subalpine cloud forests to collect fog water. However, this function has been restricted in recent decades by recurring fires in the upper mountain regions (Hemp, 2005).
Geology
Rhomb-porphyry is a rare volcanic rock type. Rhomb-porphyry is known to exist in only four locations: The East African Rift Valley including Kilimanjaro, the Oslo Rift in Norway, British Columbia in Canada and the Antarctic (Nononotte et al. 2008).
Chagga people
The cultivation zone around Mount Kilimanjaro is home to a number of ethnic groups, comprising the pastoral Maasai on the northern and north-western slopes, the Ongamo on the eastern slopes, and the Chagga agro-pastoralists on the southern and western slopes of the mountain. The largest of these ethnic groups, the Chagga, have traditionally lived on these slopes for at least four centuries. For the Chagga, land provided opportunities for various development in all their spheres of life. To attain their daily subsistence needs, the Chagga began transforming the native mountain forest. The resultant cropping system and subsistence economy resulted in a high population in the region. These highly fertile ecosystems have generated considerable agricultural wealth for the Chagga, based on indigenous traditions of extensive irrigation systems, terracing of the mountain slopes, and organic enrichment of soils (Silayo & Pikirayi, 2023).

Assessment information

High Threat
Although the biodiversity values of the site face a multitude of high threats, the values for which the site was inscribed for under the WH Convention are threatened mostly by climate change and fire, which affect the spectacular mountain scenery, including the vegetation zones for which the site was inscribed. In addition to the losses of about 300 km2 of upper montane and subalpine forests from fire since 1880, losses due to clear cutting of lower elevation forests amount to 450 km2 since 1929, bringing the total loss to ca. 750 km2. Thus Kilimanjaro has lost about 50 percent of its former forest cover. Deforestation on mountain foothills raises mean cloud condensation level that results in a gradual shrinking of the cloud zone. A similar effect is caused by global warming and drying of the air. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning inside the park is mainly affected by wildfires due to decreasing precipitation and increasing touristic activities. Such climate change-driven fires are a frequent threat during drier periods, destroying extensive areas of forest and heath shifting vegetation zones and forest lines. This affects not only biodiversity, but has also consequences for the water balance, since the fire endangered cloud forests have an important function of fog water collection, whereas the the disappearance of the small glaciers – also caused by climate change - has no effect on the water ecology. The site covers the upper reaches of the mountain above the closed forest line, so threats to the forest cover on the mid-level and lower slopes have an indirect effect on the property. Tourism pressures are increasing, creating associated problems with litter, water pollution and soil erosion.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive alien plants)
Other invasive species names
Poa annua, Acacia mearnsii, Hesperocyparis lusitanica, Eucalyptus spp., Pinus patula
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Along the tourist climbing routes, non-native species such as Poa annua occur that are introduced. However, vegetation surveys along the mountain revealed that those species do not invade natural systems (Hemp, 2008). Prior to the upgrading of the conservation status of the montane forest to Kilimanjaro National Park, human use and reforestation with exotic species were common practice. Most of the exotic species purposely planted in the lower montane forest include black wattle (Acacia mearnsii), cypress (Hesperocyparis lusitanica), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.), and pine (P. patula) among others. These plant species are among the 220 potential and invasive species recognized by the government of the United Republic of Tanzania (URT, 2019). The emergence of invasive alien species seedlings, such as A. mearnsii, A. longifolia, Pinus patula, and Grevillea robusta in the lower montane forest, indicates a high risk of future invasion (Kikoti et al. 2022). Although not directly within the WH site, there is potential for these invasive species to spread further and affect the important biodiversity values of the site. TANAPA Invasive Alien Species Management Guidelines and improvements in monitoring and recording invasive alien species have been important, but effective removal has been limited (TANAPA, 2019). According to the National Invasive Species Strategy and Action Plan (NISSAP, 2019) for 2019 to 2029, the country has identified a total of 220 invasive and potentially invasive species of which 87% are alien and 13% are native.
Fire & Fire Management
(Fire)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Regular fires occur in the colline savanna zone and in the upper montane and subalpine zone and to a lesser degree in the submontane and lower montane forest zone (Hemp, 2005c). Due to an increasingly drier climate, and higher anthropogenic impact, fires have played an increasingly destructive role in the forests of Kilimanjaro during the last 100 years and in particular over the last decades. During this time Kilimanjaro has lost about 300 km² of high altitude forests due to fire and the upper closed forest line was lowered by 900 m. 32 fire incidences have occurred in the Kilimanjaro region between 2017-2021 (URoT Vice President’s Office, 2022). As these forests have an important function for fog water collection, this has an impact on the water balance of the whole mountain. Increasing occurrences of fire lead to a change in species composition in the upper montane Hagenia-Podocarpus forests at 2800-3000 m with the giant heather Erica excelsa becoming dominant at this altitude (TANAPA, 2023). Using vegetation and rainfall data the area of KINAPA was divided into 5 zones of fire risk. Over 40% of KINAPA is located in very high and extremely high fire risk areas. The last large fires in October 2020 and 2022 destroyed about 100 km2 mainly of subalpine bushland inside the zone of extremely high fire risk, meaning an annual loss of about 1.5 Million tons of fog water input (Hemp, unpub. data).

The majority of fires are anthropogenic (TANAPA, 2023). This may be intentional, for example when fire is used by poachers, cattle herders or honey gatherers, or accidental (e.g. in the case of visitor camp fires). The unnaturally frequent fires are likely to be having an adverse effect on natural community dynamics, particularly in the heath zones where fires are most extensive, but there is currently little understanding of the effects of fire (Tanzania National Parks, 2005). The region's fire risk is uniquely complicated by the intersection of natural vulnerabilities and human activities. Traditional practices such as beekeeping, increasing tourism pressure, and agricultural expansion along the mountain's periphery create a complex web of fire risk factors (Masao et al., 2022). These human-induced pressures, combined with climate change impacts, have made Mount Kilimanjaro increasingly susceptible to devastating fires (Mambile et al. 2024).

In September 2023 a large fire ravaged the upper northeastern section of the park (Joseph, 2024: Makoye, 2023) and the lack of equipment hampered quick response to prevent extensive damage. However, the cause and extent of the damage is unclear. In October 2022 a 24h long fire burned near the Karanga site and in October a fire affected 95 sq km. These fires were likely started by locals extracting honey or through illegal poaching activities (The Guardian, 2022). Fires occur mainly at the end of the dry seasons in October or March. Regular monitoring flights with a helicopter or small airplane at the end of the dry seasons particularly over the high-risk areas above 2700m could reduce the danger of too late detected fire outbreaks. However, to extinguish such fires in a reasonable time a large firefighting airplane is needed (TANAPA, 2023).

Although increasingly frequent fires pose a very high threat to the other important biodiversity values, the threat is less for the spectacular mountain scenery. Nevertheless, fires impact the vegetation zones which are a key attribute of the value for which the site was inscribed.
Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees
(Deforestation and changing land use on the lower slopes)
Other targeted species names
Camphor (Ocotea usambarensis), Juniper (Juniperus procera), Entandrophragma excelsum, Garcinia tanzaniensis
Low Threat
Outside site
The park is surrounded by more than 90 villages (and five districts of Rombo, Hai, Siha, Moshi and Longido) and for the past 50 years the regional human population has been increasing. These adjacent communities are placing increasing pressure on the natural resources within the park boundaries, however the threat for the spectacular mountain scenery is low. Various threats emanate from almost all villages. Moshi, Rombo and Hai are known for illegal logging, firewood collection and livestock fodders. Illegal hunting for animals is most common in Rombo, Longido and Siha districts. Illegal logging accounts for 85% of the recorded illegal activities (TANAPA, 2023). Overall, predictions for the Northern Zone of Tanzania are that by 2030 agricultural land will have expanded by 8–20% under different scenarios and herbaceous vegetation and forest land cover will be reduced by 2.5–5% and 10–19% respectively (Kariuki et al. 2021). Significant decline of the primary forest has already occurred with about 19.83% degraded in the past four decades (Enoguanbhor et al. 2022). The continued growth of the villages on the mountain slopes makes it likely that overexploitation will take place in the near future. An aerial survey (Lambrechts et al. 2002) revealed that the forests of Kilimanjaro were heavily impacted by illegal logging of indigenous trees in most areas below 2500 m elevation (which lie outside the world heritage property but inside the (extended) National Park), thus reducing the functioning and ecological resilience of the entire ecosystem. Deforestation of the lower slopes is thought to be partially responsible for the retreat of the glaciers, by reducing the flow of moisture up the mountainside and depleting the mountain’s icy hood (Pepin et al., 2010). In particular the moist Ocotea forests that cover most of the southern slopes were undergoing serious destruction caused by the intensive illegal logging of camphor trees. On the eastern slopes this overexploitation has resulted in forests free of mature Ocotea but still with the same structure and otherwise the same species composition. These “potential montane Ocotea forests” cover an area of 110 km2 . This means one third of the actual camphor zone is already depleted and the remaining part is being heavily modified. The situation is similar for the second most targeted tree species, Juniperus procera. Only 40 km2 of cedar forest of a potential area of about 120 km2 on the whole northern slope were left in 2000 (Hemp 2006b). Illegal logging activities have destroyed most lower montane forests, including the habitats of the tallest trees of Africa (Entandrophragma excelsum) and the critically endangered tree species Garcinia tanzaniensis (Hemp et al., 2017). Today, after the recent repetition of the aerial survey in February 2025 about 25 years later and after the incorporation of the former forest reserve into KINAPA in 2006 the situation seems to have improved: Juniperus forests are recovering and illegal logging activities are decreasing (Hemp et al., unpub. data). Previously selectively logged sites have been shown to recover through seed rain from adjacent sites (Rutten et al., 2015). A tree planting initiative led by WWF, Kinapa and Tigo commenced in 2021 aiming to alleviate some of the deforestation cause by human activities. The overall aim is to plant 22,500 tree seedlings in Mbahe-Marangu and Ungwasi-Rombo (Elisa, 2024). The previous phase successfully planted 10,000 trees in the area. Furthermore, the NGO TanzMont, based in Old Moshi and under the guidance and administration of the KiLi-SES Project, aims not only to plant trees, but to use only indigenous, well adapted trees, and if possible, rare and endangered species such as Prioria msoo, Garcinia tanzaniensis and Entandrophragma excelsum. In combination with planting of fast-growing highly valuable timber trees such as Khaya anthotheca this NGO has the goal to enhance biodiversity, to restore riverine areas, and to improve the livelihood of people. However further action to address the increasing poverty of local communities is needed to address the reliance on the park's natural resources. This requires high-level political will.
Recreational Activities
(Impacts of tourism)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Excessive tourism creates several problems related to litter and waste management, erosion of paths and trampling of vegetation (EoH Report, 2012). A 2003-2005 study identified a direct link between trail erosion and hiking pressure, and water contamination found at lower elevations (Wakibara et al. 2009), although agricultural runoff may also be a contributing factor. According to the 2013 World Bank report, key areas of the park have experienced increased environmental degradation around the slopes, including land degradation and loss of biodiversity. Given increasing tourism to the region, impacts from tourism is of concern without a suitable sustainable tourism strategy and management measures in place. More recent figures indicate that on average 50,000 trekkers attempt the summit yearly. In the 2022/23 season approximately 47,200 tourists visited the park. Although this is an increase since the COVID-19 period, it is not comparable to the peak recorded in 2011/2012 season, when approximately 57,400 people visited the park (Statista, 2025). However, according to KINAPA, more than 68.000 tourists tried to climb Kilimanjaro in 2024. Nevertheless, daily trekker limits and a maximum safe capacity on popular trails (e.g. Machame or Marangu) are in place.
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals
(Poaching)
Other targeted species names
Abbot's duiker, Black boar, Bush pig
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Subsistence and commercial hunting is carried out in the forested lower slopes outside the World Heritage site boundaries (GMP, 2005), and to a lesser extent at higher elevations where its impact is limited due to the extremely rugged terrain and difficulty of capturing prey species (State Party of Tanzania, 2009). With the rapidly increasing population surrounding the national park, pressure on the natural resources within the park are also on the rise. Although the majority of illegal activities do not occur within the WH site itself, illegal hunting comprises 9% of the total illegal activities recorded in the national park (TANAPA, 2023).
Changes in Temperature Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Climate change)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
The most obvious indicator of changes in regional climate are the decreasing glaciers and changes in plant coverage, affecting the spectacular mountain scenery. On Kilimanjaro, the overall glacier area in km2 has declined to less than 20 % of it’s extent in 1900 with a remaining glacier surface area on Kilimanjaro of 0.98 km2 (Hinzmann et al. 2024). The total surface area of glacial ice on top of Mount Kilimanjaro decreased by 88.3% from 1912 to 2013 (Burkhart et al., 2017). The rate of retreat accelerated from 2000 to 2013, when ice decreased by 40% (Burkhart et al., 2017). Studies suggest that the Kibo glacier will diminish by the mid-21st century. This retreat is mainly due to a reduction of cloud cover, moisture and precipitation (Mölg 2012). On permanent monitoring plots in the alpine zone no immigration of species of lower elevations was observed during the last decades, but a downward migration of alpine plants into lower vegetation due to recurrent fires (Hemp 2005, and unpub data). The occurrence of non-anthropogenic forest fires on Mount Kilimanjaro has already risen with climate change, which leads to loss of subalpine cloud forest at its upper (fire) and lower (ingression of low-elevation species) boundaries (Hemp, 2006a). Some studies have also already demonstrated a change in bird species and abundance in 20 years between 1991 and 2001 (Dulle et al., 2015). For example, the most prominent bird species of Mt. Kilimanjaro, the Lammergeier Vulture, is experiencing a downward population trend due to the melting of its heavily snow-dependent habitat. Additionally, warming temperatures are benefiting the spread of non-native species (Mjema et al. 2023). The decrease in snow cover, in turn, is having significant negative impacts on species of birds, mammals, plants and invertebrates native to the mountain's upper slopes. There may also be an increased incidence of landslides and flash-flooding if precipitation falls as rain instead of snow. At elevations above 3200 meters above sea level Erica excelsa forest has presently been replaced by Erica trimera and Erica arborea bush in most areas. Erica vegetation is largely influenced and controlled by fire. The growing influence of fire pushed down the forest line replacing Erica forests with Erica bush (Hemp 2005). The changing weather patterns have also impacted animal distributions as well as terrain characteristics. Changes in migration behaviour and population dynamics of large animals has been observed in the forests of Mt. Kilimanjaro. Kilimanjaro region has been classified as a drought-striken area (URoT Vice President’s Office, 2022).
Unknown Threats
(Ecological isolation)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
In the past, the property was ‘buffered’ from adjacent settlements by a 5-10 km wide belt of protected natural forest and plantations, however there is now a sharp interface between village settlements and the park boundary, especially along the lower slopes. Kilimanjaro is becoming an increasingly isolated ecosystem, an ecological island, completely surrounded by cultivation. This has far reaching consequences for diversity and endemism as shown by bio-indicators such as endemic insect species (Hemp & Hemp, 2018). This increasing isolation requires urgent measures to ensure the ecological viability of species. For example, the loss of ecological corridors connecting KINAPA with Arusha National Park, Amboseli (Kenya) is notable, along with invasive alien species and intensive livestock grazing reported in the Kitendeni Wildlife Corridor. Additionally, riverine forest are important corridors linking upper and lower ecological zones of KINAPA. A collaboration between KINAPA, Pangani water basin and district council authorities is ongoing to improve the management of river systems.
Dams & Water Management/Use
(Unsustainable water abstraction)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Surface water is being extracted for human use in northern Tanzania including within the Kilimanjaro National Park. Around the southern slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, the open unlined canals (Mfongo in the local Chagga dialect) have been used by Chagga people, an ethnic group of Bantu origin, for decades (Kimaro et al. 2019). Gravity based irrigation canals are still the major means of supplying agricultural water around Mt. Kilimanjaro. Horticultural practices have been expanding especially in lower elevation areas and there is an increased reliance on irrigation water due to changing rainfall patterns and farming practices. There has been a significant reduction in discharge in traditional irrigation canals and changes in seasonal flow patterns (Kimaro et al., 2019). Topographical factors and soil properties influence the dynamics of canal discharge, however, management of agricultural water also has a significant impact on canal water supply. Because an alternative supply of irrigation water is lacking, rising water demand further increases the pressure on available sources (Kimaro et al. 2019).

In combination with other factors (farming practices, climate change), water abstraction can impact water quantity and quality due to increased evaporation and reduced dilution, including of the organic and inorganic material emanating from crop irrigation. Salinity, fluoride and nitrate, increase downstream in the dry season to concentrations that may be harmful. Soil biota and sensitive vegetation in lowland zones may be more affected by changes in water salinity and mineral content. Furthermore, there seems to be a link between excessive water abstraction and the spread of invasive alien species. There were more invasive spp. and less or absence of natural wetland vegetation (such as rushes and sedges) in streams where water was completely abstracted, and in those areas invasive species prevailed, mostly Ageratum conyzoides; others included Vernonia auriculifera, Caesalpinia decapetala, Senna spectabilis and Solanum spp (Mnaya et al. 2021).

As the riparian and floodplain vegetation represent a vital component of the ecological integrity and ecosystem services in the Kilimanjaro landscape, they must be protected by wisely managing water resources at the watershed scale (Pallangyo, 2022). Both formal and informal water institutions influence the current water management around Mt. Kilimanjaro. At the community level, declining authority of village water committees has been observed for decades (Kimaro et al. 2019) and needs to be addressed, especially as population growth and agricultural and horticultural expansion will further exacerbate the pressure on available water resources.
High Threat
A proposed cable car project has proceeded to an EIA, reportedly without sufficient consultations with local communities who may be impacted through loss of jobs. A cableway would add to the existing tourism pressures on the property through an estimated 50% increase in visitor numbers. The infrastructure will dramatically modify and intrude on the visual aesthetics of the property for which it was inscribed on the World Heritage List. A new climbing route on the southern slope may increase the fragmentation of the fragile forest and heathland ecosystems, which are already impacted by tourism. Reliable and updated information is required regarding both potential threats to properly assess their potential impact on the site's attributes. With some sources stating progress in the development of the cable car project amidst the national endeavour to develop cable car transport in six regions in Tanzania, the State Party should urgently provide more detailed information and an up to date EIA to assess the potential negative impacts on the OUV.
Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Cable car development)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
A cableway is proposed along the Machame Route which is noted by many media and tourism outlets as being one of the most popular for its scenic beauty. Considering the inscription of Kilimanjaro under criterion (vii) for its superlative natural phenomenon and aesthetic beauty, any visual modifications would constitute a significant threat to the property's OUV. Kilimanjaro already attracts 50,000 visitors a year primarily for climbing and is suffering from tourism pressure. The proposal to increase visitor numbers by 50% through the cable car project would put considerably more pressure on the fragile ecosystem. It also appears that local communities have not been consulted sufficiently and many are not in agreement with the project due to the potential to reduce demand for porters, which creates substantial employment in and around Kilimanjaro. However, it is unclear whether this would be the case (IUCN Consultation, 2020). An Environmental Impact Assessment has been undertaken for the proposed cable car project inside the property, however is not available for review.

Currently there are differing reports regarding the status of the cable car development project. According to Laizer (2022) the proposal has been firmly rejected due to a total of 558 tourism players in northern Tanzania voting against the cable car project on Mount Kilimanjaro. However, in a clarification statement, TANAPA stated that the planned cable car project was still in its conceptual stage and that actual execution would require government leadership at various stages as well as stakeholder engagement. During the 2022 Kilimanjaro Marathon on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, the Tanzania Prime Minister Mr Majaliwa Kassim Majaliwa made it clear that the project campaigners have a daunting task to convince the government to give the contentious plan a green light. According to CGTN (2023) a feasibility study of the possible routes for the cable car is underway and a company from Europe and another from China have shown interest in the development as international investors. It seems that the length of the route has not been finalised, with various options under consideration depending on cost and engineering issues. According to Nachilongo (2024) the proposal is part of a broader strategy to develop cable car transport in six regions in Tanzania by the Land Transport Regulatory Authority (Latra). Proposed regulations to enable these projects have apparently been developed but international consultants are being engaged to provide technical advice prior to releasing these. Due to the potential negative impacts on the OUV, updated and reliable information on the status of the cable car plans are urgently needed.
Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Opening of a new climbing route)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
In addition to the eight climbing routes and tracks, a new climbing route on the southern slope to add to the existing five climbing routes is under construction in the area of Kidia (Old Moshi). After the Maua rescue route was opened for mountain bikers a few years ago, the opening of a new route only 2-3 kilometers apart means a serious threat for the integrity of the forest and heathland ecosystems adding more disturbance to the wildlife. Road preparation and clear-cutting of the proposed trail has started in 2024. Although this poses a high threat for other biodiversity values, it does not pose a great threat to the spectacular mountain scenery.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Mostly Effective
Community relations are generally good, with the economic benefits of tourism accruing to local people who provide porter and guiding services. However, it is unclear whether consultations were undertaken with the local communities regarding the proposed cable car project, which may lead to the loss of jobs, reducing the need for porters. The World Heritage property is currently limited to the upper reaches of the mountain (above 2,700 m) so there is a wide swathe of protected forest land between it and the areas of farming settlement below the National Park boundary (at around the 1,800 m contour). Community Outreach is one of the four main programmes detailed in the General Management Plan (2018-2027), and the intention to scale-up conservation education and improve park-community communication are management objectives. According to the Ministry of Environment and Tourism, local communities residing adjacent to the five Northern Zone national parks benefit in various ways, including ecological services such as access to water (for multiple uses) economic advantages and social services. Over the past ten years (2014/2015 to 2023/2024) a total of 112 community-initiated projects in 108 villages have been carried out. Kilimanjaro NP contributes 50% to community-initiated projects. The projects were mainly based on improving social services on health sector, education sector, water services facilities and road infrastructure as well as economic development in the communities living adjacent to the National Parks in Northern Zone. The major aim of these projects is to enable adjacent communities participate in conservation as well as share benefit accrued from conservation of the respective National Parks. Conservation education is a vital part to raise awareness of parks activities and conservation issues.
Local communities have reportedly been cooperating with park authorities to report illegal resource use and partake in patrols (TANAPA, 2023) and the site management involves local communities in planning and formulation of the General Management Plan. There is a Community Relations Department that deals with the conservation education, support for Community Initiated Projects and Income Generation Projects to organised groups (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). However, according to Enoguanbhor et al. (2023) there is potential to further include local communities in forest protection activities. The park is surrounded by more than 90 villages and for the past 50 years the region's population has almost doubled. Various threats emanate from almost all villages so the effective engagement of communities in conservation is essential (TANAPA, 2023).
Legal framework
Highly Effective
The legal framework is fairly strong. Originally protected as a Forest Reserve in 1921, the uppermost section of the mountain, together with six corridors down to lower elevations (totalling 753 km2, mostly above the 2,700m contour) became a National Park in 1973 (World Heritage Committee, 2010). This was extended in 2005 to include the remaining natural forest down to the 1,800 m contour, adding a further 926 km2 to the Park. The legal framework governing Tanzania's national parks is primarily based on the National Parks Act (Chapter 282 of the 2002 revised edition) and the Wildlife Conservation Act of 1974. The Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA) is the organization responsible for managing and administering these parks with its own Board of Trustees. The State Party has identified low levels of penalties and ineffective implementation of wildlife laws outside the park as significant limitations (State Party of Tanzania, 2009). Recommendations have been given on lowering the national park boundaries to include some high-value biodiversity sites at deep river gorges (Hemp et al., 2017). Since the last Outlook assessment, a new National Environment Policy, 2021 was developed serving as a national framework for planning and sustainable management of the environment in a coordinated, holistic and adaptive manner, taking into consideration the prevailing and emerging environmental challenges as well as national and international development issues (URoT Vice President's Office, 2021).
Governance arrangements
Some Concern
The property is managed by the Tanzania National Park Authority (TANAPA). Its management is carried out in accordance with TANAPA’s national-level strategic planning processes and integrated with regional systems through the involvement of district government, local communities and a wide range of other stakeholders in planning at the site level. There is coordination between the range of administrative bodies involved in the management of the property, but it could be improved (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). Better engagement of local communities in management activities is needed and especially landowners are not being engaged sufficiently (State Party of Tanzania, 2021).
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Mostly Effective
The site's management is carried out in line with TANAPA's national-level strategic planning processes and integrated into regional systems through the involvement of the district government. Additionally, the National Environmental Master Plan for Strategic Interventions 2022-2032 aims to improve spatial coordination in addressing key environmental challenges and improving coordination between national and local governments (URoT Vice President’s Office, 2022), serving as the implementation tool of the National Environmental Policy (2021). The master plan covers all regions of the mainland Tanzania and focuses on the local scale and ecosystem level. It addresses environmental challenges identified by the National Environment Policy, 2021 and other relevant national policies.
Boundaries
Some Concern
Inadequacies in the buffer zones make it difficult to maintain the property's OUV (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). The buffer zones of the World Heritage property are known and recognised by the management authority but are not known by local communities/landowners. To address this, the management authority installed beacons that demarcate the property and the official park map was prepared by the Ministry of Land and Human Settlement Development, however this does not necessarily differentiate between the national park and the WH site. Kitendeni Wildlife Corridor within Enduiment Community Wildlife Management Area acts as buffer zone in the north western side of the park. West Kilimanjaro and North Kilimanjaro Soft Wood Plantation managed by Tanzania Forest Services also act as a buffer zones. The lower boundary of the national park (following its extension in 2005) is partially demarcated at around 1,800m, providing protection for natural forest on the mountain’s mid-level slopes, below the property (which serve as a de facto buffer zone). There is scope to extend the property to include some of the lower elevation forested slopes in order to enhance protection of animal migration corridors and improve ecological resilience to climate change.
Overlapping international designations
Data Deficient
N/A
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Data Deficient
There have been no committee decisions or recommendations requiring implementation since the property was listed in 1987
Climate action
Mostly Effective
UNESCO in collaboration with the Kilimanjaro National Park (KINAPA) authority have implemented a project titled “Empowering young women and men for adaptation to climate change at the Kilimanjaro National Park World Heritage site” funded by the Netherlands Funds in Trust (NFIT) from 2022 to 2023, as part of its support to the implementation of the Flagship Programme 3 of Priority Africa. Climate change around Mount Kilimanjaro is real and has affected local communities. It is highly linked with prolonged drought and decline of stream/river discharges (UNESCO, 2024).
Other climate centred actions include restoration of the lower montane forest by using indigenous tree species, use of solar power in tourism infrastructures, rain water harvesting, collection of weather parameters along the altitude gradient of the mountain, collaboration with international partners in studying climate and glaciers among others (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). The site management has been supporting local initiatives of tree planting on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro. Removal of invasive alien species and replacement with indigenous trees is one of routine operations in order to mitigate risks due to climate change. Further monitoring of glacier extent and depth is done by scientists from all over the world. The site management includes a risk register and mitigation action plan (State Party of Tanzania, 2021).
Management plan and overall management system
Mostly Effective
The first comprehensive management plan of Kilimanjaro National Park (the World Heritage property covers 40% of the park) was approved in May 1993 (Tanzania National Parks, 1993). This was replaced with a new one in 2005, following extension of the park to include the forested slopes of the mountain, which more than doubled its size (GMP, 2005-15). This 2005-15 GMP established High- and Low-Use Hiking Zones (comprising about 17% of the park’s area), with the remainder of the park (83%) designated as a Wilderness Zone. Management is structured around four major programmes, each aligned to one of the park’s departments, and dealing with (1) Ecosystem Management, (2) Tourism Management, (3) Community Outreach and (4) Park Operations/Development. According to the most recent periodic report, a current management plan is in place for the 2018-2027 period (State Party of Tanzania, 2021), which is structured according to the same four programmes as in the past. Each department develops annual action plans and budgets in the course of implementation of the GMP.
Law enforcement
Mostly Effective
The national park staff effectively controls the access of tourists to the protected parts of the mountain including the World Heritage site. The "green" boundary of the national park away from the large roads is however impossible to survey effectively because of the difficult terrain including many steep gorges and the large extent of the area, given the relatively small numbers of rangers available.
In recognition of the increased need for law enforcement and effective patrolling of the national park due to increasing surrounding human populations and pressures on the natural resources within the park boundaries, TANAPA has increased the number of ranger posts from four to fourteen, including improved entry and exit gates and stations and camp sites along the mountain (TANAPA, 2023). Patrols include foot, vehicle and aerial surveillance and other law enforcement agencies support the management authority. Additionally, improvements in CCTV and scanners at park entry points have been implemented along with electronic visitor registration to ensure compliance with permitted visitor days (TANAPA, 2023).
Sustainable finance
Mostly Effective
TANAPA until recently, was a self-financing semi-autonomous agency so revenue generated from tourism was retained and re-invested in park management, however this has now changed (IUCN Consultation, 2025). Although Kilimanjaro was financially self-sustaining since 1984 (UNEP-WCMC, 2012), TANAPA no longer retains revenue collections as it did in the past. All collections are now transferred to the Central Treasury, reducing the agency’s financial autonomy. This shift may affect the timeliness and flexibility of funding allocation for park management needs and could hinder effective responses to emerging conservation challenges.

According to the data provided by TANAPA all national parks in the Northern Zone generate a surplus after accounting for their different expenditure levels, including capital development and recurrent costs. This is in large part due to tourism-related income. In Kilimanjaro, the revenue generated has been steadily increasing between 2014 and 2024, with a fall during COVID-19. In 2014/15 the revenue recorded was 52,965,951,405 TZS while in 2023/24 it was 95,322,778,379 TZS (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, 2024). However, as tourism remains the major source of revenue for funding conservation of the site, fluctuation of visitations in the park may interfere with funding for conservation of the OUV (State Party of Tanzania, 2021).
Staff capacity, training and development
Some Concern
Following the severe bushfires in 2022 and 2023, Altezza Travel has provided firefighting equipment to staff of the national park to strengthen fire prevention capabilities, and the rapid mobilization of 600-700 volunteers for immediate response when necessary (Businesswire, 2024; Joseph, 2024). The current workforce in Kilimanjaro National Park is 188 staff, composed of 164 conservation rangers and 24 officers (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, 2024). This is the highest staff number compared to the other northern parks managed by TANAPA. Nevertheless, the training of staff could be better tailored towards enhancing understanding of the WH site, its OUV and important attributes (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). Furthermore, there is an identified need of almost 300 staff to cover the area and management activities effectively (State Party of Tanzania, 2009).
Education and interpretation programmes
Data Deficient
Community outreach is one of the four core programmes described in the current management plan and scaling up the conservation education programme is one of its main objectives. Eight specific actions are identified, and the park's Community Relations Unit is responsible for provision and raising conservation awareness of the site to stakeholders including local communities. However, insufficient information is available to assess the effectiveness of current activities.
Tourism and visitation management
Mostly Effective
The trend of increasing visitor numbers despite increased climbing fees poses a threat to the ecosystems along the climbing routes through littering, increased fire incidence, and wildlife disturbance. However, because of the strict regulations, only designated trails and camp sites are affected (Hemp, 2008). Existing park interpretation facilities are rudimentary, but the GMP envisages development of a new visitor centre at the Marangu park headquarters and ‘mini-interpretation’ sites at selected locations elsewhere. A proposed cable car project and a new climbing route pose considerable threat to the OUV.
TANAPA aims to reinforce conservation and sustainable tourism development across the Norther Zone national parks through annual budgets and actions plans (TANAPA, 2019). According to the State Party there is a tourism management strategy in place and integrated in the GMP including several manuals to guide tourism operations including Tourism manual, Tourism marketing Strategic Plan, Standard operation procedures for bandas and walking safaris among others (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). The emphasis is on low impact tourism through a number of approaches such as Trash In Trash Out strategy, banning use of plastics, establishment of well maintained trails. Adherence to both national laws and legislation on Mount Kilimanjaro is important in assuring conservation of the World Heritage OUV by all mountain users. Monitoring of tourists has improved with better entry and exit systems (see law enforcement section) (TANAPA, 2023).
Sustainable use
Some Concern
There is no consumptive use of resources allowed within the property or parts of the park beyond its boundaries on the forested mid-slopes. However, under the GMP, Wildlife Management Areas are supported in communal areas beyond the park boundary in order to ensure sustainable use of resources and protect wildlife that moves between these areas and the park. There have been reports of illegal logging and poaching within the park, however law enforcement efforts have recently been enhanced to address this. Local communities have reportedly been cooperating with park authorities to report illegal resource use and partake in patrols (TANAPA, 2023), however, there is further need to effectively involve local communities in decision-making processes and management activities to further reduce unsustainable natural resource use. The Community Relations Department could be a suitable body to improve these relations.
Monitoring
Mostly Effective
The park’s ten-year GMP (2005-15) was based on a ‘Logical Framework Approach’ that allows for easy development of three-year action plans and annual operations plans that can be readily monitored and evaluated, thereby facilitating adaptive management. There is no information on the success of this approach to planning at the park. Under the GMP’s Ecosystem Management Programme, an Ecological Monitoring Plan was to be formulated, focusing on five specific ‘conservation targets’, namely (1) the elephant population, (2) mammalian biodiversity, (3) eco-climatic zones, (4) glaciers and (5) water and catchment values. The updated plan reportedly follows the same structure and approach to monitoring.

TANAPA has Monitoring and Evaluation unit which monitors implementation of corporate objectives through measuring the performance key indicators. Through this unit, the conservation of OUV is also monitored (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). Monitoring of conservation of Mount Kilimanjaro is also supported by an Internal Audit System and external audit (National Audit Office of Tanzania).
Through the department of Ecological Monitoring TANAPA has put a plan in place to enhance capacity of the staff to deal with issues related to invasive species. The department has a well functioning task-force “Invasive Alien Species (IAS) Thematic Team” whose responsibilities include the following: Overseeing the implementation of Invasive Alien Species Management Guidelines, advise the organization on relevant research, identify potential areas for staff capacity building in relation to invasive alien species (TANAPA, 2019).
Research
Mostly Effective
The property does not have a comprehensive research programme, but there are a number of externally-supported long-term research activities including research on vegetation (University of Bayreuth, Germany), elephants of west Kilimanjaro (African Wildlife Foundation) and glacial ice (University of Ohio) (State Party of Tanzania, 2009). From 2010 to 2016, the multidisciplinary research group FOR 1246 "KiLi - Kilimanjaro ecosystems under global change - Linking biodiversity, biotic interactions and biogeochemical ecosystem processes" founded by the German Research Council (DFG) investigated many aspects of ecosystem functioning within the 12 twelve major vegetation types on the mountain. In October 2020 a following multidisciplinary DFG-research group FOR 5064 "The role of nature for human well-being in the Kilimanjaro Social-Ecological System, KiLi - SES" focussed on people - nature interactions and nature contribution to people.
To conduct research in national parks, researchers must obtain clearance from the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) through Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI). Between 2014 and the 2024, 11 research permits were issued for the Northern Zone national parks, covering topics such as wildlife ecology, human-wildlife conflict, wildfires, ecohydrology, climate, zoonotic disease management, forest ecology, and glaciers (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, 2024).

Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Some Concern
The extension of the park in 2005 has improved protection and restoration of forest on the mid-slopes of the mountain. However, educational efforts targeting the uncontrolled and unsustainable use of the natural resources by adjacent communities are still in need of improvement (Minja, 2014), especially considering the rapid growth of local communities in surrounding villages. Excessive water abstraction also remains an issue. TANAPA is proactive and conveys its ecohydrology findings and recommendation to stakeholders and local and national governments for implementation if appropriate. When implemented, these initiatives, within and outside the park, do not eliminate the threats posed by the water crisis, but they amplify the opportunities for sustainable development at the basin scale. Due to the lack of management and enforcement capacities in the buffer zone, the legal framework thus far has not been effective at preventing negative impacts on the site’s values (State Party of Tanzania, 2021). However, the Government of Tanzania has increased efforts to address environmental challenges according to the National Environment Policy (2021) and the Master Plan for Strategic Interventions 2022-2032. These policy developments provide hope that a more coordinated approach to address environmental challenges is developed along with a reprioritisation and mainstreaming of environmental concerns at the national level.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Mostly Effective
There is an identified need for almost 300 staff, however current numbers are reported around 188 (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, 2024). Nevertheless, the support from other organisations to enhance capacity, for example for fire fighting is very welcome. Furthermore, the site is consistently delivering a financial surplus, although the current financing model is highly reliant on tourism. Despite these inadequacies, however, the World Heritage property (covering about 40% of the park, at higher elevations) is characteristically resilient and requires relatively low levels of management input to retain its values and ecological integrity. With increasing impacts from climate change however, it is expected that the levels of management will need to be intensified in the future, along with effective monitoring.
The remote location and rugged terrain of the property ensures a high degree of natural protection against unsustainable resource use, limiting the need for management intervention. However, with the increasing human population on the peripheries and the enhanced impacts from climate change, more active and adaptive management responses are required. Although a current management plan is in place, there are various aspects in need of improvement, especially concerning the engagement of local communities in forest protection activities and decision-making processes, the coordination between administrative bodies, the demarcation and awareness raising of site boundaries, improved staff capacity and reduction in illegal natural resource use. The efforts at the national level to prioritise tackling environmental challenges and establish a coordinated response in this regard, for example through the 2021 National Environmental Policy is welcomed, as is the strong legal framework and enhanced law enforcement efforts at the site level. A concern is that TANAPA no longer retains revenue collections as it did in the past. However the impact on the timeliness and flexibility of funding allocation for park management needs remains to be seen. Furthermore, issues regarding insufficient human capacity hindering implementation of policy frameworks remain.

Africa’s highest peak and one of the world’s largest free-standing mountains

Good
Trend
Stable
The last major period of volcanic activity was 450,000 years ago (Stewart, 2004), and its status as Africa’s highest peak is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.

Spectacular mountain scenery

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
For many visitors a significant element in the scenic values of Kilimanjaro is the existence of glaciers and snowfields close to the equator. A four-fold increase in visitor numbers since the property was listed is creating the demand for further infrastructure and problems associated with litter and sanitation, all of which diminishes the outstanding natural beauty of the place. The proposed cable car project in particular, if approved, would dramatically alter the visual aesthetics of the property and lead to considerable visitor pressure. The already started construction of a new climbing route will have similar effects. The most pressing issue facing the vegetation zones and spectacular mountain scenery remains the increasing fire risk on the mountain, resulting in shifts of vegetation belts, tree line and affecting the water balance (Hemp A, 2005). The glacier area has declined to less than 20 % of it’s extent in 1900 with a remaining glacier surface area on Kilimanjaro of 0.98 km2 (Hinzmann et al. 2024).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
The scenic values of the site, which are intimately linked to the occurrence of glaciers and snowfields close to the Equator, are being compromised as the ice melts. The glaciers are expected to disappear altogether from Kilimanjaro within a couple of decades. The glacier area has declined to less than 20 % of it’s extent in 1900 with a remaining glacier surface area on Kilimanjaro of 0.98 km2. A four-fold increase in visitor numbers since the property was listed is creating the demand for further infrastructure and problems associated with litter and sanitation, all of which diminishes the outstanding natural beauty of the place. The proposed cable car project in particular, if approved, would dramatically alter the visual aesthetics of the property and lead to considerable visitor pressure. The already started construction of a new climbing route will have similar effects. The most pressing issue facing Mt. Kilimanjaro’s vegetation zones remains the increasing fire risk on the mountain, resulting in shifts of vegetation belts, tree line and affecting the water balance.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
High Concern
Deteriorating
The biodiversity values of the property are likely to be responding to (1) climate change and (2) improvements in the protection of habitat in the forested ‘buffer zone’. As the lower national park border is not effectively protected and some high-value biodiversity areas even lie outside the park, their disappearance is likely. Still, this will not have a strong effect on the property itself. The occurrence of non-anthropogenic forest fires on Mount Kilimanjaro has risen with climate change. The structure and composition of the subalpine vegetation on this mountain is strongly influenced by recurrent fires. At elevations above 3200 meters above sea level Erica excelsa forest has presently been replaced by Erica trimera and Erica arborea bush in most areas. Erica vegetation is largely influenced and controlled by fire. The growing influence of fire pushed down the forest line replacing Erica forests with Erica bush. Fire has also shifted the upper frontier of Erica trimera bush and replaced it with a vegetation of Helichrysum cushion (Hemp A, 2005). The decrease in snow cover, in turn, is having significant negative impacts on species of birds, mammals, plants and invertebrates native to the mountain's upper slopes. For example, the most prominent bird species of Mt. Kilimanjaro, the Lammergeier Vulture, is experiencing a downward population trend due to the melting of its heavily snow-dependent habitat. The warming of the mountain's temperatures is also resulting in the increased prevalence of species that are non native to the mountain's ecosystem. This is likely since these non-native species have a greater capacity to thrive in the warmer climate, placing an additional strain on the resources of the region's native species (Mjema et al. 2023).
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important values
Good
Stable
Mount Kilimanjaro retains its geological values.

Additional information

Water provision (importance for water quantity and quality)
Mount Kilimanjaro serves an invaluable role as a water catchment, maintaining biodiversity and life-support systems downstream, as well as economically important hydro-electric facilities and irrigation schemes.
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Climate change
Impact level - Moderate
Trend - Continuing
Habitat change
Impact level - Low
Trend - Continuing
Decreasing precipitation on the whole mountain and ongoing population growth associated with land clearing are having a negative impact on the amount of water available from the mountain (Hemp, 2009). Furthermore, climate change-induced wild fires decrease the amount of fog water collected by the subalpine cloud forests (Hemp, 2005).  In a 2010 survey of stakeholders of the property including villagers and park employees of their perception of Mount Kilimanjaro, the authors found that they considered the non-consumptive forest uses, including ecosystem services, the top priority above consumptive use (Kijazi & Kant, 2010). This therefore illustrates the potentially significant impact any degradation of the forest, water and glacier will have on the local communities, economies and wildlife.
Mount Kilimanjaro serves an invaluable role as a water catchment, maintaining biodiversity and life-support systems downstream. However decreasing precipitation, human population growth and pressures on natural resources is affecting the provision of this benefit. 
Organization Brief description of Active Projects Website
1 Different stakeholders According to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (2024) the following research projects are ongoing within Kilimanjaro NP: - Tanzanian invertebrates, a virtual national reference collection (TINC) in Arusha and Kilimanjaro - Beta diversity analysis and drivers of variation in stream macroinvertebrates altitudinal assemblages on Mount Kilimanjaro-Tanzania. - Postfire effects on ground beetles’ composition on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro. - Future climate change impacts on the supply of water related NCP along climate and land use gradients TANAPA-Funded Prioritized Research projects: - Tourism, Conservation and Local Livelihoods at Mount Kilimanjaro National Park - The Efficiency of ‘Trash-in Trashout’ as Waste Disposal Approach on Kilimanjaro National Park - Assessment of local community dependence on natural resources from the half mile strip of Kilimanjaro National Park - Effects of wildfires on vegetation of Kilimanjaro National Park, Tanzania
2 Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Frankfurt, Germany , University of Bayreuth, Germany; University of Bern, Switzerland and other universities in Germany and Tanzania (SUA, USDM, Mweka, Mzumbe, TPHPA), funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) Investigation of the interactions and inter-dependencies between people and nature at Mount Kilimanjaro under land-use, climate, and governance change. The results will provide the scientific basis for political and societal decision-making that will facilitate transformation towards sustainable relationships between nature and people at Kilimanjaro.
https://kili-ses.senckenberg.de/

References

References
1
Baker, N.E. and Baker, E.M. (2002) Important bird areas in Tanzania. A first inventory. Wildlife Society of Tanzania, Dar es salaam Tanzania.
2
Burkhart, P. A., Alley, R. B., Thompson, L. G., Balog, J. D., Baldauf, P., & Baker, G. S. (2017). Savor the cryosphere. GSA Today, 27(8), 4.
3
Business Wire (2024). Altezza Travel Enhances Fire Response Capabilities at Mt. Kilimanjaro National Park. Business Wire. Published online 16 September 2024. [online] Available at: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240916291076/en/Al…
4
CGTN (2023). Tanzania plans cable car for Mount Kilimanjaro. CGTN Africa. Published online 16 June 2023. Available at: https://africa.cgtn.com/tanzania-plans-cable-car-for-mount-…
5
Dulle, H. I., Ferger, S. W., Cordeiro, N. J., Howell, K. M., Schleuning, M., Böhning-Gaese, K. and Hof, C. (2016). Changes in abundances of forest understorey birds on Africa's highest mountain suggest subtle effects of climate change. Diversity Distrib., 22: 288–299. doi:10.1111/ddi.12405.
6
Elias, R. (2024). Tree planting drive kicks off to save Mount Kilimanjaro. The Citizen Tanzania. Published online 30 May 2024. [online] Available at: https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/news/national/tree-pl…
7
Enoguanbhor, E. A., Chukwurah, G. O., Enoguanbhor, E. C., Isimah, M. O., Kosun, A. E. O., Ewurum, N. I., & Albrecht, E. (2024). Underlying Anthropogenic Driving Factors of Forest Landscape Degradation in the Kilimanjaro World Heritage Site, Tanzania Using Survey-based Data. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 23(2), 1115-1122.
8
Enoguanbhor, E. A., Enoguanbhor, E. C., & Albrecht, E. (2022). Spatial determinants of forest landscape degradation in the Kilimanjaro World Heritage Site, Tanzania. Central European Journal of Geography and Sustainable Development, 4(2), 5-23.
9
EoH Report (2012). Final Report on the Enhancing Our Heritage project for Kilimanjaro National Park. PAMS Foundation
10
Hemp A (2006a). The Impact of fire on diversity, structure, and composition of the vegetation on Mt. Kilimanjaro. In: Spehn EM, Liberman M, Körner C (eds) Land use change and mountain biodiversity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 51-69
11
Hemp A (2006b). Vegetation of Kilimanjaro: hidden endemics and missing bamboo. African Journal of Ecology 44:305-328. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00679.x
12
Hemp A (2008). Introduced plants on Kilimanjaro: tourism and its impact. Plant ecology, 197, 17-29
13
Hemp A (2009). Climate change and its impact on the forests of Kilimanjaro. African Journal of Ecology 47:3-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.01043.x
14
Hemp, A. & Hemp, C. (2018). Broken bridges. The isolation of Kilimanjaro's ecosystem. Global change biology. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14078
15
Hemp, A. (2005): Climate change driven forest fires marginalizes the ice cap wasting on Mt. Kilimanjaro. Global Change Biology, 11, 1013-1023.
16
Hemp, A. (2006c). Continuum or zonation? Altitudinal diversity patterns in the forests on Mt. Kilimanjaro. Plant Ecology, 184(1), 27-42.
17
Hemp, A., Zimmermann, R., Remmele, S., Pommer, U., Berauer, B., Hemp, C., & Fischer, M. (2017). Africa’s highest mountain harbours Africa’s tallest trees. Biodiversity and conservation, 26(1), 103-113.
18
Hinzmann, A., Mölg, T., Braun, M., Cullen, N. J., Hardy, D. R., Kaser, G., & Prinz, R. (2024). Tropical glacier loss in East Africa: recent areal extents on Kilimanjaro, Mount Kenya, and in the Rwenzori Range from high-resolution remote sensing data. Environmental Research: Climate, 3(1), 011003.
19
IUCN (1987). World Heritage Nomination - IUCN Technical Evaluation, Kilimanjaro National Park. [online] Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/403/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
20
Joseph, J. (2024). Tourism stakeholders equip Kilimanjaro National Park with firefighting gear. The Citizen. Published online 22 June 2024. [online] Available at: https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/news/national/tourism…
21
Kariuki, R. W., Munishi, L. K., Courtney-Mustaphi, C. J., Capitani, C., Shoemaker, A., Lane, P. J., & Marchant, R. (2021). Integrating stakeholders’ perspectives and spatial modelling to develop scenarios of future land use and land cover change in northern Tanzania. PloS One, 16(2), e0245516.
22
Kijazi, M.H. & Kant, S. (2010) Forest stakeholders' value preferences in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 12 (5): 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.007
23
Kikoti, I. A., Ndangalasi, H. J., Kayombo, C. J., & Musoma, R. M. (2022). Soil Seed Bank Composition and Diversity in Areas Invaded with Invasive Alien Species in the Lower Montane Forest of Kilimanjaro National Park, Tanzania. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=4914122
24
Kimaro, J. G., Scharsich, V., Kolb, A., Huwe, B., & Bogner, C. (2019). Distribution of traditional irrigation canals and their discharge dynamics at the southern slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro. Frontiers in environmental science, 7, 24.
25
Laizer, J. L. (2022). Tourism stakeholders rejects cable cars on Mt Kilimanjaro. Tourism & Environmental Conservation. Tanzanian Affairs, issued by the Britain-Tanzania Society. Published online 1 May 2022. Available at: https://www.tzaffairs.org/category/tourism-environmental/
26
Lyimo P, Macrice S, Emily C, Munishi P, Paul C, Bugingo A, Masaka K, Kitasho N, Justine S (2019). Invasive Alien Plant Species in Tanzania. Version 1.3. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Department of Ecosystems and Conservation. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/oa1kgt accessed via GBIF.org on 2025-02-21.
27
Makoye, K. (2024). Fire erupts on Mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania. Anadolu Ajansı. Published online 9 September 2023. [online] Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/fire-erupts-on-mount-kilima…
28
Mambile, C., Kaijage, S., & Leo, J. (2024). Deep Learning Models for Enhanced Forest-Fire Prediction at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: Integrating Satellite Images, Weather Data and Human Activities. Natural Hazards Research. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S26665921…
29
Mbeyale, G. E., & Mcharo, N. (2022). Institutional and land use dynamics of Chagga homegardens in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation, 91(1), 101-119.
30
Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (2024). Northern Zone, Quick Reference. TNP/BDS/SOP/17. The United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism. Tanzania National Parks. October 2024. Pp. 68. Available online at: https://www.tanzaniaparks.go.tz/uploads/publications/en-173…
31
Minja G (2014). Vulnerability of tourism in Kilimanjaro National Park and the livelihoods of adjacent communities to the impacts of climate change and variability. European Scientific Journal, ESJ 10
32
Minja, G. (2014). Vulnerability of tourism in Kilimanjaro national park and the livelihoods of adjacent communities to the impacts of climate change and variability. European Scientific Journal, 10(29)
33
Mjema, J., Namwamba, J. B., Malusu, J., Kiwale, K., & Kangwana, L. (2023). Impact of Climate Change on Flora and Fauna of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Cradle Knowl: Afr J Educ Soc Sci Res, 11(2), 69-75.
34
Mnaya, B., Elisa, M., Kihwele, E., Kiwango, H., Kiwango, Y., Ng'umbi, G., & Wolanski, E. (2021). Are Tanzanian National Parks affected by the water crisis? Findings and ecohydrology solutions. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 21(3), 425-442.
35
Nachilongo, H. (2024). Tanzania drafts regulations for planned cable transport. The Citizen. Published online 23 February 2024. Available at: https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/news/national/tanzani…
36
National Invasive Species Strategy and Action Plan (NISSAP) (2019-2029). Published by The Vice President’s Office, DODOMA. Available at: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/tan215234.pdf
37
Pallangyo, M. E. (2022). Understanding the Ecological Impacts of Water-Abstraction and Changes in Surface Water Availability in the Kilimanjaro Landscape, Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)). Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/591813032.pdf
38
Pepin, N. C., Duane, W. J., & Hardy, D. R. (2010). The montane circulation on Kilimanjaro, Tanzania and its relevance for the summit ice fields: Comparison of surface mountain climate with equivalent reanalysis parameters. Global and Planetary Change, 74(2), 61-75.
39
Peters, M. K., et al. 2019. Climate–land-use interactions shape tropical mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Nat ure 568:88–92.
40
Silayo, V. M., & Pikirayi, I. (2023). Community-based approaches in the construction and management of water infrastructures among the Chagga, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Land, 12(3), 570.
41
State Party of Tanzania (2009). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Kilimanjaro National Park (United Republic of Tanzania). Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/403/documents/
42
Statista (2025). Number of tourists who visited Kilimanjaro National Park in Tanzania from 2011 to 2023. Statista. Data released 2023. [online] Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1389433/tourists-visita…
43
Stewart, A. (2004). Kilimanjaro. A complete Trekker’s Guide. Cicerone, Cumbria (UK)
44
TANAPA (2019). Report on Invasive Alien Organisms. Tanzania National Parks. February 2019. [online] Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&…
45
TANAPA (2023). Kilimanjaro National Park. Celebrating the Golden Anniversary in Biodiversity Conservation and Tourism. Tanzania National Parks. Special Edition. Available at: https://www.tanzaniaparks.go.tz/uploads/publications/en-167…
46
Tanzania National Parks (1993). Kilimanjaro National Park General Management Plan 1993. Tanzania National Parks Authority, Arusha.
47
Tanzania National Parks (2005). Kilimanjaro National Park General Management Plan 2005 - 2015. Tanzania National Parks Authority, Arusha.
48
The Guardian (2022). Firefighters tackle blaze on Tanzania’s Mount Kilimanjaro. The Guardian, Agence France-Presse in Dar es Salaam. Published online 23 October 2022. [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/23/firefighters-…
49
UNEP-WCMC (2012) Kilimanjaro National Park, United Republic of Tanzania. UNEP-WCMC World Heritage Information Sheets. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC.
50
UNESCO (2024). UNESCO collaborates with KINAPA to empower young women and men for climate change adaptation. UNESCO World Heritage Convention news. Published online 8 March 2024. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/2665
51
URoT Vice President’s Office (2021). NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 2021. United Republic of Tanzania, Vice President’s Office. Published October 2021. Available at: https://www.vpo.go.tz/uploads/publications/sw-1644923087-NA…
52
URoT Vice President’s Office (2022). NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MASTER PLAN FOR STRATEGIC INTERVENTIONS (2022 – 2032). United Republic of Tanzania, Vice President’s Office. Published June 2022. Available at: https://www.vpo.go.tz/uploads/files/MASTER%20PLAN-English_e…
53
Wakibara, J., Ndesari, K. & Mafuru, N. (2009) Tourism-related impacts on Mount Kilimanjaro, tanzania: Implications for tourism management on mountain ecosystems. Journal of Tourism Challenges and Trends, 2 (1), 111-123.
54
World Heritage Committee (2010). Decision 34 COM 8E Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value (United Republic of Tanzania). Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/403/documents/

Indigenous Heritage values

Would you like to share feedback to support the accuracy of information for this site? If so, send your comments below.

التحقق
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.