Mistaken Point
Country
Canada
Inscribed in
2016
Criterion
(viii)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
This fossil site is located at the south-eastern tip of the island of Newfoundland, in eastern Canada. It consists of a narrow, 17 km-long strip of rugged coastal cliffs. Of deep marine origin, these cliffs date to the Ediacaran Period (580-560 million years ago), representing the oldest known assemblages of large fossils anywhere. These fossils illustrate a watershed in the history of life on earth: the appearance of large, biologically complex organisms, after almost three billion years of micro-dominated evolution. © UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
11 أكتوبر 2025
Good
Current state and trend of VALUES
Good
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
An outstanding record of a critical milestone in the history of life on Earth “when life got big”
Criterion
(viii)
Mistaken Point fossils constitute an outstanding record of a critical milestone in the history of life on Earth, “when life got big” after almost three billion years of microbe-dominated evolution. The fossils range in age from 580 to 560 million years, the longest continuous record of Ediacara-type megafossils anywhere, and predate by more than 40 million years the Cambrian explosion, being the oldest fossil evidence of ancestors of most modern animal groups. Mistaken Point contains the world’s oldest-known examples of large, architecturally complex organisms, including soft-bodied, ancestral animals. Ecologically, Mistaken Point contains the oldest and most diverse examples of Ediacaran deep-sea communities in the world thus preserving rare insights into the ecology of these ancestral animals and the early colonization of the deep-sea floor. Other attributes contributing to the property’s Outstanding Universal Value include the world’s first examples of metazoan locomotion, exceptional potential for radiometric dating of the assemblages, and evidence for the role of ancient oxygen levels in the regional and global appearance of complex multicellular life (World Heritage Committee, 2016).
Unique ecoregion
The property and its buffer zone lie within Newfoundland’s Eastern Hyper-oceanic Barrens ecoregion dominated by open barrens and bogs. Barrens here are characterized by extensive carpets of heath moss (Racomitrium lanuginosum), which has a restricted distribution, along with some arctic-alpine plants (e.g. alpine azalea) (PAA, 2008). Additionally, the ecoregion is valuable for its bird life, especially seabirds that have colonies near the WH site. In the Mistaken point Ecological Reserve 190 bird species have been recorded with 13 globally threatened, including Leach’s Storm-Petrel (Hydrobates leucorhous), Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica) and Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) (Clements et al. 2024).
Assessment information
Current threats to the World Heritage site are very low. Visitation is the only potential disturbance, but remains strictly controlled and no incidences of successful thefts of fossils have occurred since 1987 when the area was declared a reserve.
Recreational Activities
(Impacts from visitation)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Visitation to Mistaken Point is limited and is strictly controlled. No successful fossil thefts have occurred since the site was designated as an ecological reserve in 1987 (World Heritage Committee, 2016; State Party of Canada, 2024). The remoteness of the area limits the number of tourists who are mainly geotourists or educational groups (IUCN, 2016). In 2023 283 guided hikes were carried out with a total of 2,691 participants (ntv, 2024). According to the state party, visitors to the site over the past 5 years have fluctuated between 780-2563 (State Party of Canada, 2024). Most illegal activities result from visitors entering the property without a permit, or using a motorized vehicle. This activity has a very low risk of site damage. There is always the potential for vandalism of the fossils, but the site is well monitored and risk is considered to be low (State Party of Canada, 2024). Previous studies conducted in relation to the Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve in Newfoundland have shown that footfall on fossiliferous surfaces is potentially a highly significant agent of erosion (Matthews and McIlroy 2019). This footfall erosion is localised to the key fossil sites, and steps taken with visitor to mitigate this damage.
Prospects of any significant development within or adjacent to the World Heritage site are very limited and therefore overall potential threats are very low. The most significant threats are the ongoing issue of change resulting from natural erosion processes, and the possible impact from pollution originating from passing vessels. Higher and more frequent wind (specifically abrasion) and water table acidity can degrade the quality of the fossils over time. Sea level rise will be the greatest factor affecting the condition of the fossil surfaces. Fossil beds that are normally above the effects of tidal flow will be increasingly affected by sea level rise, causing more erosion of the fossil surfaces in the future.
Residential Areas, Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Residential areas and development)
Outside site
Mistaken Point’s relative isolation and exposed windswept coastal location have protected it from past development (IUCN, 2016). There are no permanent inhabitants within the World Heritage site or its buffer zone and prospects for any development within the site or adjacent to it are very limited (World Heritage Committee, 2016).
Geological Events
(Erosion )
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
The main potential threat to the World Heritage site stems from the impact of natural processes, such as surface erosion, wave erosion, rock falls and landslides. High energy storm waves constitute the biggest potential threat but the rate of erosion is very slow (IUCN, 2016). Impact marks damaging Ediacaran sites in Newfoundland are reported from sites in the province e.g. Murphy’s Cove in Discovery UNESCO Global Geopark and Pigeon Cove at the Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve and are shown to greatly impact the fidelity of the fossils preserved there (McKean et al. 2024).
Changes in Physical & Chemical Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Climate change)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
As climate change intensifies more extreme weather events will affect the northern hemisphere and boreal environment. In September 2021, Hurricane Larry made landfall on the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland - the first hurricane within 11 years to reach the shores of Newfoundland. With the predicted increases in hurricane activity in the Atlantic Ocean, the island can expect to experience more of these events during the warm summer months, which could increase erosion rates (Heerah et al. 2025). Higher and more frequent wind (specifically abrasion) and water table acidity can degrade the quality of the fossils over time (State Party of Canada, 2024). Sea level rise will be the greatest factor affecting the condition of the fossil surfaces. Fossil beds that are normally above the effects of tidal flow will be increasingly affected by sea level rise, causing more erosion of the fossil surfaces in the future (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution, Garbage & Solid Waste
(Pollution from passing vessels)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Probably a threat to the site from external sources outside the management authority's control would originate from ocean going vessels along the Atlantic trade route from Europe to North America. Any sort of illegal dumping or untethered equipment has the potential of reaching the coastline. Negative threat would primarily come from untethered fishing gear that may wash up onshore, potentially causing damage to surfaces (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Relationship with local communities is positive with various initiatives empowering stakeholders in active management of the site. Various mechanisms for stakeholder engagement are, or have been, in place including the Mistaken Point Ambassadors Inc (MPAI), Mistaken Point World Heritage Site Advisory Council, local development group Mistaken Point - Cape Race Heritage Inc., Edge of Avalon Interpretive Centre; Reserve Interpreters Team, and Fossil Guardians (IUCN, 2016). Establishment of a community advisory committee has been the primary formal means of engagement with local people. The Mistaken Point Ambassadors were an advisory group that formed to guide the nomination effort; this group stayed engaged as a local advisory committee until the Mistaken Point World Heritage Advisory Council was formed in 2018. The Mistaken Point World Heritage Advisory Council is currently comprised of 13 members; four representatives of the local communities of Portugal Cove South, Trepassey, St. Shott’s and Biscay Bay, as well as one youth representative and eight further representatives of local development groups, municipalities and applicable federal and provincial agencies (Newfoundland Labrador Government, 2018). The local development group, Mistaken Point – Cape Race Heritage Inc. owns the Edge of Avalon Interpretive Centre, which has exhibits about Mistaken Point and is the starting point for guided hikes to the World Heritage Site. The group partners with the government of Newfoundland and Labrador to present and promote Mistaken Point to the public. Since inscription, ranger and interpretation staff have visited every home in the community of Portugal Cove South to discuss Mistaken Point, traditional use permits and to engage in community relationship building for the World Heritage Site. Future visits will expand to neighbouring communities to further build relationships to protect and celebrate Mistaken Point.
Legal framework
The property (95%) is strictly protected under the Wilderness and Ecological Reserves Act and Fossil Ecological Reserve Regulations. Buffer zone areas extending outside the ecological reserve as well as a small area excluded to permit site access, are protected, limiting development (State Party of Canada, 2024).
The area of the World Heritage site is provincial Crown lands administered by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Almost all of the site lies within the boundaries of Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve and is therefore governed under the Newfoundland and Labrador Wilderness and Ecological Reserves Act and Fossil Ecological Reserve Regulations. The remaining 0.03% of the property is designated as a Crown Lands Reserve under the Lands Act. Designation under Lands Act allows development of trail infrastructure to enhance visitor safety and reduce ecological impacts (State Party of Canada, 2016).
The area of the World Heritage site is provincial Crown lands administered by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Almost all of the site lies within the boundaries of Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve and is therefore governed under the Newfoundland and Labrador Wilderness and Ecological Reserves Act and Fossil Ecological Reserve Regulations. The remaining 0.03% of the property is designated as a Crown Lands Reserve under the Lands Act. Designation under Lands Act allows development of trail infrastructure to enhance visitor safety and reduce ecological impacts (State Party of Canada, 2016).
Governance arrangements
The area of the World Heritage site is provincial Crown lands administered by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador governed under the Newfoundland and Labrador Wilderness and Ecological Reserves Act and Fossil Ecological Reserve Regulations.
Mistaken Point World Heritage Advisory Council provides advice to the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador regarding the World Heritage Site's management and conservation and facilitates a coordinated approach between the managing agency and local organizations and stakeholders. Cape Race Heritage, a not for profit group that is in partnership with provincial government provides services for the World Heritage Site. Relationship with local communities is positive with various initiatives empowering stakeholders in active management of the site.
Mistaken Point World Heritage Advisory Council provides advice to the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador regarding the World Heritage Site's management and conservation and facilitates a coordinated approach between the managing agency and local organizations and stakeholders. Cape Race Heritage, a not for profit group that is in partnership with provincial government provides services for the World Heritage Site. Relationship with local communities is positive with various initiatives empowering stakeholders in active management of the site.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Integration of the site's management into regional and national planning systems is deemed mostly effective, given that the conservation of the site's OUV is not necessarily affected by wider development issues and broader landscape /seascape management. The Mistaken Point World Heritage Advisory Council is designed to ensure the effective communication between the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Municipalities and local organizations and stakeholders as well as advise the provincial government on conservation issues and how the site is presented to the public (Newfoundland Labrador Government, 2018). Movement of the Natural Areas section to a new Department in September, 2020, provides opportunity for increased cooperation with municipal planning activities. The department is also represented on the Canadian-Newfoundland and Labrador Coastal and Oceans Management group which brings together a planning group comprised of provincial and federal government stakeholders in the area of coastal and ocean management.
Boundaries
The boundaries of the World Heritage site encompass all attributes of its Outstanding Universal Value (IUCN, 2016), including all of the key fossils and strata. The site and its buffer zone, in large part corresponds to the full coastline of Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve. The World Heritage site itself spans the coastal profile between ordinary low water-mark and extends inland to an easily identifiable natural feature, the turf edge (IUCN, 2016). A buffer zone extends further landward some 30 meters to account for the retreating profile over time (IUCN, 2016). The width of the buffer zone should be sufficient to absorb the very gradual, long-term retreat of the coastline due to natural erosion (World Heritage Committee, 2016; State Party of Canada, 2024).
Overlapping international designations
N/A
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
The site has not been subject to any requests from the World Heritage Committee to date, and therefore is not assessed under this criteria.
Climate action
Climate change and severe weather conditions contribute to the overall condition of the world heritage site. No direct preventative action is possible. Effects of ongoing climate change cannot be mitigated. Remediation efforts conducted when required. Monitoring of conditions and their direct effect on site are recorded. Additional monitoring may occur following severe weather events. Climate data is recorded by Environment Canada and severe and sudden impacts are assessed and reconciled when they occur (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Management plan and overall management system
The Mistaken Point World Heritage site lies almost entirely (99.97%) within the boundaries of the Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve (State Party of Canada, 2016), and therefore fits into an existing conservation regime, managed by Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Natural Areas section, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Municipalities. Provincial Natural Areas staff work in close cooperation with several partners including Mistaken Point – Cape Race Heritage Inc. to protect, present and manage the site sustainably and to enhance tourism experiences and economic benefits for the local community (IUCN, 2016). Site management is also guided by a World Heritage specific management plan from 2013. Management Systems and Management Plans are discussed frequently and no significant changes to the original management plan have been deemed necessary (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Law enforcement
There are partnerships with both provincial and federal wildlife enforcement officers who can be called upon for assistance with issues in the Ecological Reserve as needed. A federal police (RCMP) detachment in Ferryland also provides local law enforcement capacity. A constant presence through daily patrols along with community engagement leading to a local feeling of ownership have deterred law breaking within the World Heritage Site. Two Ranger positions were staffed over the reporting period. Rangers undertake daily patrols of the reserve and World Heritage Site and patrol hours have increased since inscription. The site is patrolled 365 days a year. Attempted fossil collection from site hasn't occurred in the past 25 years (State Party of Canada. 2024).
Sustainable finance
The available budget is adequate for effective management of the World Heritage property. 100% of the management costs are covered by the government. The collection of fees as part of site visitation does not directly support the monitoring and stewardship of the property. Instead, fees support our NGO partner to help alleviate costs associated with maintaining the building that is jointly occupied by ourselves and Mistaken Point Cape Race Heritage Inc. (State Party of Canada, 2024). Total annual funding provided by the provincial government to operate the Mistaken Point site is approximately $600,000 (Newfoundland and Labrador Government, 2018a), which more than meets the commitment of $500,000 per year outlined in the nomination dossier. The budget includes $470,000 each year for staffing, and approximately $65,000 each year for operational support. In addition, a $15,000 annual operating grant and approximately $50,000 of site revenue each year are provided to the not-for-profit development group, Mistaken Point – Cape Race Heritage, which operates the Edge of Avalon Interpretive Centre. There are additional project funds that may be provided for special projects such as the $150,000 of provincial government funds that supported conservation research at Mistaken Point from 2016 – 2018.
Staff capacity, training and development
The staff complement at Mistaken Point was increased following inscription to meet the staffing resource outlined in the nomination document: four year-round and nine seasonal staff. A manager and Natural Areas staff at provincial headquarters continue to oversee management of Mistaken Point and provide planning, ecological and GIS support. Training has been provided to staff each season since inscription on such topics as Wilderness and Remote First Aid, interpretation theory, interpretive script development, techniques for delivery of interpretation programming, team building and multi-cultural awareness, In most cases, staff from the local partner group, Mistaken Point – Cape Race Heritage, were also able to participate in these training opportunities.
Through its long-term pledge to provide operational funding and staffing, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador is committed to ensure that the highest possible standards of protection and presentation are maintained in the property (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Local staffing is at the level described in the nomination dossier. The site is remote, making professional training difficult to access. Efforts are made to engage visiting researchers in presenting their data to staff and local communities. Although there is no capacity building plan per se, Management is primarily by local staff whilst training is offered on an identified needed basis (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Through its long-term pledge to provide operational funding and staffing, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador is committed to ensure that the highest possible standards of protection and presentation are maintained in the property (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Local staffing is at the level described in the nomination dossier. The site is remote, making professional training difficult to access. Efforts are made to engage visiting researchers in presenting their data to staff and local communities. Although there is no capacity building plan per se, Management is primarily by local staff whilst training is offered on an identified needed basis (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Education and interpretation programmes
Education and the promotion of Mistaken Point's values is a central theme in the site's management (Newfoundland and Labrador Government, 2018), and interpretive programs are centred around guided tours of the fossil sites and educational material presented at the Edge of Avalon Interpretive Centre. For conservation purposes and visitor safety, guided tours to the fossil-bearing surfaces are strictly controlled (Newfoundland and Labrador Government, 2018b). Tours are generally booked to capacity during the summer months. The site is now seeing an increase in visitation during shoulder seasons which are extended longer than most other tourism destinations in NL (mid-May through to mid-October). Visitor feedback has been positive. For example, in 2019 out of 596 responses collected, 538 visitors gave the guided hike a 5 on a 1-5 rating scale (5 being most satisfied). Initiatives to involve school groups and other programs like girl guides and boy scouts are a priority for the year-round interpreter, to expand education, awareness and youth interest in the OUV of the site. Interpreters use visitor surveys and research to improve the delivery of interpretive programs. Since inscription, interpretive panels and tour information handouts are now offered in French as well as English. The exhibit room has been improved with a wall mounting of a cast depicting one of the spectacular fossil-bearing surfaces at Mistaken Point. The tour organization in the exhibit room has been improved in order to deliver the significant story of this site under a more interactive, smooth flowing, and informative program, which accommodates visitors from many different backgrounds.
Tourism and visitation management
The values of the site are naturally resilient to pressure from tourists, given the nature of the geological values. A full-time onsite manager to oversee the work of several professional natural history interpreters, as well as several local student placements to assist in this interpretation have been installed within the management team since the inscription of the site (Newfoundland and Labrador Government, 2018b). There is also evidence of adaptive management in the site. For example, to mitigate the threat of erosion of fossils by foot traffic, visitors were required to wear quilted ‘Bama Sokkets’ starting in 2009. However, it was subsequently found that this may not be an effective management intervention, especially in wet conditions, which led to the discontinuation of the use of ‘Bama Sokkets’ to replace them with a hydrophobic alternative (Matthews and McIlroy, 2019). To mitigate the potential effects of foot traffic at Mistaken Point, 'specific commitments were made to UNESCO, prior to the designation, limiting the number of visitors to the site each year' (Newfoundland and Labrador Government, 2018b). Providing a full complement of staff at Mistaken Point for the operating season is a top priority for the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Municipalities. This enables the available tours to be fully subscribed. In addition, student positions now have earlier start dates than in previous years and one or two positions may be extended into the fall. This reportedly provides sufficient staff resources to run tours at full capacity throughout the tourism season. Visitor management is focused on reducing environmental impacts and less on the sustainability of tourism and how it directly relates to the economic and socio-cultural impacts of the region. Two local groups are actively conducting tours within the property boundary. These tours are presented as cultural experiences and are not directly communicating the OUV of the property (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Sustainable use
Subsistence hunting and gathering are viewed as positives by site managers. They are in place as part of the community relationship and are meant to ensure a positive working relationship between management and the traditional users of the land (State Party of Canada, 2024). Traditional use of the property prior the Ecological Reserve status is maintained through use of permits issued to local individuals.
Monitoring
The monitoring framework is set out in detail in the nomination file for the site's inscription on the World Heritage list and thus relates directly to the values of the site which comprise its OUV, as well as the threats to them. Indicators used to monitor the state of conservation of the site’s palaeontological values include those relating to natural weathering and erosion and human-caused impacts, the level of scientific interest and activity in the values of the site and the ecological integrity within the site (State Party of Canada, 2016). On-site staff, especially the year-round staff, are responsible for the monitoring activities as outlined in the management plan. Fossil-bearing surfaces are checked regularly for material accumulation, and removal of larger, loose detritus occurs if it imposes a threat to the fossils. Staff are also investigating additional methods of monitoring the site, including high detailed mapping of all significant paleontological sites within the property, aerial drone surveying of the site after significant weather events, and time lapse camera monitoring of highly sensitive areas.
The indicators listed in section 6 of the Mistaken Point World Heritage Site Management Plan are, for the most part, still relevant and provide guidance for a complete monitoring program of site. (State Party of Canada, 2024).
The indicators listed in section 6 of the Mistaken Point World Heritage Site Management Plan are, for the most part, still relevant and provide guidance for a complete monitoring program of site. (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Research
Research of the site's extensive suite of Ediacaran fossils has traditionally been a strong point for the site. Indeed the ongoing research at the site continues to shed light on the evolution of life during that period, including new discoveries which further our understanding of the diversity of life during that geological time period (e.g. Darroch et al., 2018; Gehling & Droser, 2018; Mitchell et. al 2015; Mitchell & Kenchington, 2018; Mitchell et al. 2019; Matthews et al., 2020; Matthews et al. 2021; Stephenson et al. 2024; Mitchell et al. 2025). Furthermore, the Mistaken Point Scientific Advisory Committee was formed following inscription of the site and comprises experts in Ediacaran palaeontology, geology and earth sciences to provide technical and academic advice for the conservation and preservation of the Mistaken Point fossils (Newfoundland and Labrador Government, 2018), making research a cornerstone of the site's management.
Although there is considerable research it is not directed towards management needs and/or improving understanding of Outstanding Universal Value. Research results are not directly distributed to public or external agencies although, if requested, they can be. Additionally, researchers are asked if they would like to present their current research and/or past research at the community level as 20 minute to 1 hour presentations conducted at the interpretative center during the tourist season. All locals and visitors are welcome to attend (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Although there is considerable research it is not directed towards management needs and/or improving understanding of Outstanding Universal Value. Research results are not directly distributed to public or external agencies although, if requested, they can be. Additionally, researchers are asked if they would like to present their current research and/or past research at the community level as 20 minute to 1 hour presentations conducted at the interpretative center during the tourist season. All locals and visitors are welcome to attend (State Party of Canada, 2024).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Threats originating outside the site are limited with minimal management requirements. Therefore their management is deemed mostly effective. Threats such as from climate change and pollution form passing vessels is under limited influence by the site's management. Nevertheless, ongoing monitoring is occurring to determine any impacts on fossils and react accordingly to mitigate damage.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
The 'Mistaken Point World Heritage Site Management Plan', prepared in 2013, which provides guidance within the context of the legally binding Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve (MPER) Management Plan of 2009, was deemed appropriate at the time of inscription within the framework of the management goals and policies for the wider Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve (MPER). A process for monitoring progress is in place, as described in the nomination file (State Party of Canada, 2016), which focusses specifically on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the site. However there is no information as of yet whether the long term management objectives are being met, although according to the most recent periodic report, the current management plan is regularly evaluated and no changes are deemed necessary (State Party of Canada, 2024). The MPER Management Plan and the Mistaken Point World Heritage Site Management Plan are implemented by the Natural Areas section within the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Municipalities. The Natural Areas team includes year-round local staff dedicated to site protection, conservation, management and promotion; the Natural Areas manager is responsible for the site.
Overall, the protection and management of the site is mostly effective. The Mistaken Point World Heritage Site Management Plan provides a clear and still relevant framework for the protection of the site's OUV, within the broader context of the Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve in which the site's boundaries are well defined. The Mistaken Point World Heritage Advisory Council and Scientific Advisory Committee are able to provide appropriate advice to management interventions towards conserving and optimizing the site's OUV, including strengthening research and monitoring efforts. Some concerns have been noted by various stakeholders that tourism and visitation management could be improved, especially by increasing tourist numbers. However these concerns have been addressed to some extent by the State Party in the context of commitments made to UNESCO upon inscription regarding limitation of the numbers of visitors at the site in order to preserve the sites values. The guided hikes to view the fossils and the exhibits and interpretation available at the Edge of Avalon Interpretive Centre allow the story of the Mistaken Point fossils to be available to all visitors. Climate change and severe weather conditions contribute to the overall condition of the world heritage site and although no direct preventative action is possible, remediation efforts are conducted when required. Monitoring of conditions and their direct effect on site are recorded and additional monitoring may occur following severe weather events.
An outstanding record of a critical milestone in the history of life on Earth “when life got big”
Good
Trend
Stable
The values of the site are in good condition and stable, with almost no threats currently or potentially affecting them (IUCN, 2016; State Party of Canada, 2024).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Stable
The values of the World Heritage site are in good condition and stable, with almost no threats currently or potentially affecting them.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
Low Concern
Deteriorating
Leach’s Storm-Petrel (Hydrobates leucorhous), Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica) and Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) are all secure according to the latest national species assessment (Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council, 2022). However other bird species occurring at Mistaken point are assessed as critically imperilled in Newfoundland e.g. Black headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus). Overall, an increasing number of birds recorded are being assigned to an increased level of extinction risk. Carpet heath moss is assessed as secure.
The impact of climate change on the alpine-arctic plants of the area remains unclear but is increasingly being studied.
The impact of climate change on the alpine-arctic plants of the area remains unclear but is increasingly being studied.
Additional information
Importance for research,
Contribution to education
Scientific research of Mistaken Point fossil surfaces is crucial for understanding the origins and early evolution of animals. Mistaken Point surfaces are the best examples of Ediacaran fossil sites globally in terms of number of fossils on each of the D and E surfaces, and in terms of diversity of organisms and quality of fossil preservation for 550 - 580 million years ago (Matthews et al. 2020, Mitchell and Pates 2025). Research on these sites has dramatically changed our understanding of early animal evolution (Darroch et al., 2018; Gehling & Droser, 2018; Mitchell & et. al. 2015; Mitchell & Kenchington, 2018, Mitchell et al. 2019, Stephenson et al. 2024; Mitchell et al. 2025; Mitchell and Pates 2025; Matthews et al. 2020). Understanding the evolution of life on Earth has enormous public interest, and the Mistaken Point fossil sites provide the largest collection of some oldest animals known globally. As such, they are incorporated in crucial museum exhibits about the evolution of life on Earth, including globally recognised museums such as the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, USA and the Royal Ontario Museum, Canada.
Visitor and scientific research permits are properly controlled, and so there is no threat to the sites from educational or research groups.
Mistaken Point fossil surfaces are crucial for understanding the first animals and their early evolution from 560 - 580 million years ago. The incredible number of fossils at Mistaken Point enable insights into Late Precambrian life that would not otherwise be possible.
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council. (2022). Wild Species 2020: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 172 pp.
|
| 2 |
Clements, J. F., P. C. Rasmussen, T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, T. A. Fredericks, J. A. Gerbracht, D. Lepage, A. Spencer, S. M. Billerman, B. L. Sullivan, M. Smith, and C. L. Wood. 2024. The eBird/Clements checklist of Birds of the World: v2024. Downloaded from https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ [Taxonomy]
|
| 3 |
Darroch, S. A., Laflamme, M., & Wagner, P. J. (2018). High ecological complexity in benthic Ediacaran communities. Nature ecology & evolution, 2(10), 1541.
|
| 4 |
Heerah, K. M., Clarke, K., & Reader, H. (2025). The response of small boreal catchments to extreme weather event: Hurricane Larry. EGUsphere, 2025, 1-18.
|
| 5 |
IUCN (2016). World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation, Mistaken Point (Canada). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2016, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
|
| 6 |
IUCN. (2016). World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation, Mistaken Point (Canada). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2016, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
|
| 7 |
Lyons, T. W., Droser, M. L., Lau, K. V., Porter, S. M., & Gehling, J. G. (2018). Ediacaran scavenging as a prelude to predation. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, 2(2), pp.213-222.
|
| 8 |
Matthews, J. J., Liu, A. G., Yang, C., McIlroy, D., Levell, B., & Condon, D. J. (2021). A chronostratigraphic framework for the rise of the Ediacaran macrobiota: new constraints from Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve, Newfoundland. Bulletin, 133(3-4), 612-624.
|
| 9 |
Matthews, J.J. and McIlroy, D. (2019). On the Adhesion of Sediment to Footwear and the Implications for Geoconservation. Geoheritage, 11(4), pp.1749-1756.
|
| 10 |
Matthews, J.J. and McIlroy, D. 2019. On the adhesion of sediment to footwear and the implications for geoconservation. Geoheritage, 11, 1749–1756, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00380-3
|
| 11 |
Matthews, J.J., Liu, A.G., Yang, C., McIlroy, D., Levell, B. and Condon, D.J. (2020). A chronostratigraphic framework for the rise of the Ediacaran macrobiota: New constraints from Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve, Newfoundland. GSA Bulletin.
|
| 12 |
McKean, C., Matthews, J. J., Rideout, B. W., Taylor, R. S., & McIlroy, D. (2024). Protecting Newfoundland’s palaeontological geoheritage: Mitigating anthropic and environmental damage to the Ediacaran fossils of Upper Island Cove. Geoheritage, 16(2), 45.
|
| 13 |
Mitchell, E. G., & Kenchington, C. G. (2018). The utility of height for the Ediacaran organisms of Mistaken Point. Nature ecology & evolution, 2(8), 1218.
|
| 14 |
Mitchell, E. G., Stephenson, N. P., Buma-at, P. A., Roberts, L., Dennis, S., & Kenchington, C. G. (2025). Variation of population and community ecology over large spatial scales in Ediacaran early animal communities. Global and Planetary Change, 104818.
|
| 15 |
Mitchell, E.G. and Pates, S., (2025). From organisms to biodiversity: the ecology of the Ediacaran/Cambrian transition. Paleobiology, pp.1-24.
|
| 16 |
Mitchell, E.G., Harris, S., Kenchington, C.G., Vixseboxse, P., Roberts, L., Clark, C., Dennis, A., Liu, A.G. and Wilby, P.R. (2019). The importance of neutral over niche processes in structuring Ediacaran early animal communities. Ecology letters, 22(12), pp.2028-2038.
|
| 17 |
Mitchell, E.G., Kenchington, C.G., Liu, A.G., Matthews, J.J. and Butterfield, N.J. (2015). Reconstructing the reproductive mode of an Ediacaran macro-organism. Nature, 524(7565), pp.343-346.
|
| 18 |
Mitchell, E.G., Stephenson, N.P., Buma-at, P.A., Roberts, L., Dennis, S. and Kenchington, C.G., (2025). Variation of population and community ecology over large spatial scales in Ediacaran early animal communities. Global and Planetary Change, p.104818.
|
| 19 |
Newfoundland and Labrador Government. (2018). Minister Announces Appointments to New Mistaken Point World Heritage Advisory Council. [online] 15 October, Fisheries and Land Resources; Tourism, Culture, Industry and Innovation. Available at: https://www.gov.nl.ca/releases/2018/flr/1015n02/ (Accessed 17 August 2020).
|
| 20 |
Newfoundland and Labrador Government. (2018b). Ministerial Statement – Mistaken Point World Heritage Site to be Featured at Royal Ontario Museum. [online] 19 November, Fisheries and Land Management. Available at: https://www.gov.nl.ca/releases/2018/flr/1119n06/ (Accessed 17 August 2020).
|
| 21 |
Ntv (2024). Cape St. Mary’s and Mistaken Point Ecological Reserves Reopen. Ntv. Published online 13 May 2024. Available at: https://ntv.ca/cape-st-marys-and-mistaken-point-ecological-…
|
| 22 |
PAA (2008). Eastern Hyper-Oceanic Barrens. Protected Area Association of Newfoundland and Labrador. Available at: https://www.gov.nl.ca/ecc/files/natural-areas-pdf-island-7-…
|
| 23 |
State Party of Canada (2024). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Mistaken Point, Canada. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1497/documents/
|
| 24 |
State Party of Canada. (2016). Nomination of Mistaken Point as a World Heritage Site. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1497/documents/ (Accessed 17 August 2020).
|
| 25 |
World Heritage Committee. (2016). Decision 40 COM 8B.12 Mistaken Point Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (Canada). In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 40th Session (Istanbul/UNESCO, 201&9. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6790>.
|