Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls
Country
Zambia,
Zimbabwe
Inscribed in
1989
Criteria
(vii)
(viii)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
These are among the most spectacular waterfalls in the world. The Zambezi River, which is more than 2 km wide at this point, plunges noisily down a series of basalt gorges and raises an iridescent mist that can be seen more than 20 km away. © UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
11 أكتوبر 2025
Good with some concerns
Current state and trend of VALUES
Low Concern
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
Largest curtain of falling water
Criterion
(vii)
At peak flow, this is the world's largest curtain of falling water. It is 1708m wide, with up to 500 million litres per minute of descending water, creating a plume of spray that rises 500m into the air and which can be seen 20km away. The site comprises several islands upstream of the Falls and eight spectacular gorges (World Heritage Committee, 2012).
Outstanding natural phenomenon supporting important species and ecosystems
Criterion
(vii)
The downstream gorges serve as breeding habitat for the globally threatened Taita Falcon. Other breeding species of interest include black stork, Verreaux's eagle and African black swift. Along the river above the falls, white-backed night heron, African finfoot, African skimmer and rock pratincole breed (BirdLife International, 2020). The riverine 'rainforest' within the waterfall splash zone is a fragile ecosystem of discontinuous forest on sandy alluvium, dependent upon maintenance of abundant water and high humidity resulting from the spray plume (World Heritage Committee, 2012). In addition, the upstream islands and the riverine strip along the Zambezi River are important habitats for a number of species (including elephants) and are areas of scenic beauty contributing to the ambience of the site.
Ongoing geological process
Criterion
(viii)
The falls represent a stage in a geological process that has been ongoing for some two million years, involving the Zambezi River cutting through east-west fissures in the basalt plateau, forming a series of retreating falls. The zig-zag series of gorges below the present falls testify to the location of seven previous waterfalls, and the Devil’s Cataract (at the western end of the present falls) represents the start of the cutting back to an eighth location. The gorge system below the falls continues for some 110 km, with 16 km of this included within the World Heritage property (UNEP-WCMC, 2012; World Heritage Committee, 2012).
Diversity of megafauna
Above the falls the Zambezi flows relatively slowly, creating a series of wide channels and islands, with woodlands along its banks inhabited by a diversity of typical African megafauna including elephant, hippopotamus, buffalo and several antelope species.
Assessment information
The Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls World Heritage site is currently facing multiple significant threats that could potentially jeopardize its Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). Urban growth and development in adjoining areas, such as Victoria Falls and Livingstone, are expanding rapidly without adequate planning, leading to habitat fragmentation and visual intrusion. Tourism activities, including adventure sports, helicopter tours, and infrastructure development, are causing noise pollution, habitat disturbance, and aesthetic degradation. Reduced water flows over the falls, driven by hydro-power generation and exacerbated by climate change, are altering the hydrological regime and diminishing the site's iconic visual spectacle. Illegal activities, such as poaching, fishing, and logging, are further degrading biodiversity, while invasive species like Lantana camara and water hyacinth threaten native ecosystems. Periodic droughts and uncontrolled fires add to the ecological stress, impacting both wildlife and local communities. These current threats underscore the urgent need for enhanced management, enforcement, and sustainable practices to mitigate their impacts and preserve the site's OUV.
Residential Areas
(Urban growth and development in adjoining areas)
Outside site
The population and infrastructure of the towns of Victoria Falls (Zimbabwe) and Livingstone (Zambia), bordering the property, are expanding rapidly without adequate planning (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). The population of nearby Livingstone, Zambia, increased, for example, from 103,288 in 2000 to 139,509 in 2010 and 178,361 in 2022 (Zambia Central Statistical Office, 2015; City Population, 2022). The States Parties have also reported that "the Victoria Falls Municipality is looking into developing its current stand measuring 7.86 ha located within the centre of the town into mixed-use developments that will have a state-of-the-art Civic Centre, Theme park, Conference Centre, Shopping mall and a 5-star hotel." (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2018). The suitability of such developments, particularly a theme park immediately adjacent to the property, is questionable. It is unclear whether these projects have undergone full and proper impact assessments, which fully consider the values of the site and their potential negative impact upon them, and at what stage planning is for these projects currently.
Recreational Activities
(Tourism activities)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
The destination has a reputation for tourist ‘adventure activities' with white-water rafting, bungee-jumping, abseiling, and a gorge swing all in operation (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). More than a decade ago, around 40 river cruise boats were estimated to be operating from the Zimbabwean shore above the falls (UNESCO and IUCN, 2006), which can be assumed to have increased further today. There are also jet-boats, micro-light aircraft, and many helicopters operating tourism flights overhead. In addition to associated infrastructure developments, many of these activities cause direct disturbance to wildlife and sensitive habitats above and below the Falls, as well as creating excessive noise pollution (and other pollution concerns) and generally impinging on the aesthetic values of the property (UNESCO and IUCN, 2006). A study conducted in 2013/2014 found no signs of taita falcon at Batoka Gorge, where signs were previously common (Jenkins et al., 2019). Although the reasons for the decline are unknown, speculative explanations include excessive disturbance from adventure tourism and helicopter, as well as growth in rural human population (ibid.) and invasive species (AWHF, 2015). In 2024, the Committee recalled its concern regarding the increasing pressure from tourism infrastructure within and around the property, exacerbated by insufficient implementation of strategic planning, and requested the States Parties to finalize and submit the JMP for review by IUCN before it is adopted and to ensure that it incorporates necessary safeguards and thresholds to mitigate against developmental pressures for the protection of the property’s OUV, and zonation of the property, including well prescribed limits of use and permissible activities (including infrastructure), in line with the objectives of protecting the OUV and with past Committee decisions (UNESCO, 2024).
Roads, Trails & Railroads
(Road, rail and infrastructure corridor)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
The site is bisected by a road and rail transport corridor which crosses the gorge immediately below the Falls over the Victoria Falls Bridge (built 1904-5). Whilst the Bridge has become a tourist attraction in its own right, associated with this corridor is an unsightly collection of fences and buildings, including the Zambian/Zimbabwean customs and immigration services (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). Further infrastructure within the site includes the power station and its ancillary buildings on the north bank (built late 1930s, significantly expanded in 1960s and 70s). Further threats are seen from tourism-related developments within the railway reserve, with plans for further developments.
Dams & Water Management/Use
(Reduced water flows over the falls due to abstraction for hydro-power generation)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
A 60MW hydro-electric power station on the Zambian side of the falls requires 175 m3/s to operate at full capacity, representing a considerable proportion of the Zambezi’s total flow during the drier months (flow rates below 400m3/s are usual from early September to mid-December) (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). Ongoing monitoring of water flow of the Zambezi River upstream of the fall showed a decline over recent years, with climate change attributed as a causative factor (States Parties of Zambia/ Zimbabwe, 2016; 2018). In 2021, the States Parties presented data from the past few years on water flow and rainfall, but this stops short of responding to the previous Committee request to summarize how these findings have informed management, including how water abstraction from the Zambezi River continues to be adapted in the face of climate change (UNESCO, 2023).
Recreational Activities, Other Human Disturbances
(Noise pollution)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Noise pollution from sightseeing helicopter tours and micro-light aircraft carrying visitors to view the Falls from above significantly impacts across the whole site and the surrounding area, compromising the wilderness qualities of the site and its aesthetic value. There are at least five helicopter companies with nine helicopters operating on the Zimbabwean side alone, and an estimated 60,000 tourists participated in this activity in 2019 (VFCC Master Plan, 2024). Sunset party boats operating on the upper river also cause localised noise pollution and disturbance issues. As many as 60 river cruise boats operate from the Zimbabwean shore above the falls (UNESCO and IUCN, 2006), and at least 200,000 tourists participated in this activity in 2019 (VFCC Master Plan, 2024). An increasing number of lodges upstream of the Falls reportedly now have helipads and operators offering an increasing number of services, including flying through sections of the gorge, creating significant noise disturbances (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution
(Water Pollution)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Tourist and municipal wastes, including sewage, are polluting both land and water (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). The main sewage ponds for the municipality of Livingstone require rehabilitation and are leaking untreated sewage into the property (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). The Zambezi River, which feeds the falls, has been subjected to various pollutants, including agricultural runoff, sewage discharge, and industrial effluents. These contaminants degrade water quality, adversely affecting aquatic habitats and species. The power station complex within the property is reported to collect and dispose of all domestic and facility wastes (including oil) outside the property, but there is clearly a risk of leakages (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). Articles from 2010 report of the Victoria Falls municipality dumping raw sewage into the Zambezi River (Newsday, 2010). In addition, sewage is sporadically released into the Zambezi River below the Victoria Falls Hotel, which is caused by failures in other parts of the system. There is also a risk of small-scale but regular pollution incidents from the many tourism operations and motor launches operating on the river.
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals, Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees, Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Illegal poaching, fishing and logging)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Poaching has been reported as a threat in the past (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). Illegal poaching remains a critical threat to the property, primarily targeting wildlife within the park’s boundaries. Species such as elephants and antelopes are particularly vulnerable, as poachers exploit the area for bushmeat and ivory trade (IUCN, 2020). The proximity of local communities, coupled with economic hardship, often drives individuals to engage in poaching as a means of survival. However, there is a lack of detailed data on current poaching activities affecting large megafauna and other species in the site at present. While anti-poaching patrols have been established, enforcement remains challenging due to limited resources and vast terrain. Without stronger monitoring and alternative livelihood programs for local communities, poaching could further degrade the ecological integrity of the site (Zulu, 2023). Illegal fishing in the Zambezi River poses another significant threat, affecting aquatic biodiversity and the broader ecosystem of the heritage site. Unregulated fishing methods, such as the use of nets with small mesh sizes and poison fishing, contribute to the depletion of fish stocks and disrupt food chains (Katz, 2017). This not only threatens local fish populations but also impacts species that rely on the river for sustenance, including birds and larger predators. Illegal removal of trees for wood is notable across the whole site, driven by economic issues (and regular power outages) with residents collecting for firewood as well as for carving curios (idem). Though less prominent than poaching and fishing, Illegal logging also threatens the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls ecosystem. The demand for fuelwood and timber has led to deforestation in surrounding areas, reducing critical habitats for wildlife and increasing soil erosion risks (Zulu, 2023). Vegetation loss can further exacerbate climate-related challenges, such as reduced rainfall retention and increased vulnerability to extreme weather events.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Spread of invasive species)
Invasive/problematic species
Lantana camara
Eichhornia crassipes
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
The property faces significant ecological challenges due to the spread of invasive alien species. Notably, plant species such as Lantana camara and Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) have been identified as priority concerns within the area. These invasive species threaten native biodiversity by outcompeting indigenous flora, disrupting habitats, and altering ecosystem functions. Lantana camara is spreading aggressively and has colonized the cliff faces in the Falls and gorges (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). The proliferation of Lantana camara, for instance, can lead to the displacement of native plant communities, thereby affecting the fauna that depend on them (Chenje & Johnson, 2007). In addition to the visual intrusion of these invasive species, Lanatana camara has also been reported to be impacting the nesting sites of taita falcon (AWHF, 2015). Similarly, the spread of Eichhornia crassipes in aquatic environments can impede water flow, reduce oxygen levels, and negatively impact aquatic life (Chenje & Johnson, 2007). The States Parties, with the support of local environmental charities and tourism operators, have been continuing efforts to control these species (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2016, 2018). For example, both the chemical and mechanical methods have been used to control the spread of Lantana camara, with more than 70% of the 5.24km2 transboundary invaded area cleared to date (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2016; 2018). The States Parties continued controlling these invasive alien species using the mechanical and chemical control methods (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). Despite these efforts, challenges persist due to factors such as limited resources, the resilience of invasive species, and the continuous reintroduction of these species from surrounding areas (Zulu, 2023). Indian mynah, an aggressive avian exotic, has also been recorded in the site.
Residential Areas, Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Tourism infrastructure development)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
There are a number of hotels, restaurants, visitor centres, camps, boat moorings, and other tourism facilities within the property (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). As mentioned elsewhere, at least seven hotels/lodges/camps fielding more than 400 beds have been established in the “red zone” since the approval of the first JIMP in 2007. In addition, four restaurants/entertainment facilities of various sizes have also been established in the “red zone” (Draft JIMP revision, 2024). None of these should have been permitted in terms of the successive JIMPs. A tethered balloon project was also under consideration at the same time. A short-term moratorium on such developments was imposed in 2007, but had been lifted by 2008 (UNESCO, 2008). In 2017, a proposal for a Ferris wheel on Eastern Cataract Island and a hotel in the development zone was communicated by Zambia. These were confirmed not to have materialized in the 2018 report; however, pressure for tourism sites ever closer to the waterfall is on the increase. In 2020, media articles reported that land within the WH site was being sold off to a Chinese developer for the construction of a separate Ferris Wheel (The Mast, 2020). The Committee has urged the States Parties to abandon proposals from the outset, which are incompatible with the conservation of the property's OUV and the approved Joint Integrated Management Plan 2016-2021, such as a cable car within the property, a glass bridge linking Zambia and Zimbabwe over the first gorge and a tourism resort and a golf course within the buffer zone of the Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park (World Heritage Committee, 2019). In 2021, the Committee was informed that the now named Mosi-oa-Tunya Livingstone Resort Hotel, whose construction had previously been ceased following the Committee's request in 2007, had been scaled down in size from 80 to 16.85 ha and would no longer include a golf course (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe). In 2024, the Committee regretted that the construction of the Hotel had concluded despite its request to halt further activities (UNESCO, 2024). Media reports state that the Zimbabwe government aims to gain $5bn in revenue from the tourism industry by 2025, with a particular focus on developing towns and infrastructure around the Victoria Falls (Matiashe, 2022), indicating that the threat from further tourism developments in and around the site remains high. In fact, the cumulative effect of these developments will be to significantly change the aesthetic character of the site and also see a shift away from the current marketing value of wilderness and nature-based tourism.
Terrestrial Animal Farming, Ranching & Herding
(Livestock Farming / Grazing)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Cattle grazing and crop cultivation have been reported to be well established within the property (UNEPWCMC, 2012). The indigenous Toka-Leya people, residing near Chief Mukuni’s village, traditionally engage in agriculture and livestock rearing, utilizing resources within the World Heritage site. The interface between wildlife, livestock, and human populations in this area raises significant concerns about the transmission of diseases affecting both wild animals and domestic livestock. A study highlighted that approximately 58.3% of respondents were aware of diseases impacting both sectors, underscoring the need for integrated disease management approaches (Chanda, 2016). Furthermore, the presence of livestock within the park may lead to habitat degradation, competition for resources, and potential conflicts with wildlife conservation objectives.
Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Periodic drought)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Severe drought in 2001/2 decimated the park’s fauna (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). 2019/2020 also saw significantly lower than average dry season river flow levels linked to lower rainfall across the wider catchment. During this period, the Zambezi River's flow diminished substantially, leading to a dramatic reduction in the volume of water cascading over the falls. This unprecedented decline not only altered the visual spectacle of the falls but also raised concerns about the broader implications of climate change on the region's hydrology (The Guardian, 2019). Reports indicated that the 2019 drought was one of the worst in a century, with water levels at Victoria Falls dropping to their lowest recorded levels, intensifying fears about long-term climate variability and its effects on both the ecosystem and local economies (The Guardian, 2019). The ecological consequences of such droughts extend beyond the falls themselves, affecting the surrounding ecosystems and biodiversity. Reduced water availability can lead to habitat loss for aquatic and terrestrial species, increased competition for dwindling resources, and heightened vulnerability to wildfires. The demand for hydropower places additional stress on dwindling water supplies. Additionally, local communities that depend on the river for agriculture, fishing, and tourism face economic hardships during these periods, with reduced water supply affecting food security and livelihoods (The Guardian, 2019).
Fire & Fire Management
(Uncontrolled fires)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
One of the risks to the long-term sustainability of the natural resources vis-à-vis vegetation in the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Property is the risk of uncontrolled fires (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). Fire had been previously reported to be damaging vulnerable forest habitats and preventing forest regeneration in some areas (UNEP-WCMC, 2012). However, evidence of fires reported through satellite monitoring indicates that this is a relatively low threat, especially to the core of the site. To protect the natural habitat of the property from uncontrolled wild fires, the responsible institutions in the respective States Parties region carried out controlled burning by creating fire-breaks and land clearing through grading in selected areas of the property. Identified stakeholders actively participated in this activity (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). The potential threat of wildfire on both sides of the river is higher in drought years.
Dams & Water Management/Use
(Batoka Gorge Hydro Electric Scheme )
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
A 181m-high dam proposed for the Batoka Gorge is located 54km downstream of the property and is reported will flood the gorges to within 650m of the property, flooding a significant section of the gorges, with the loss of habitat for cliff-nesting birds as well as significant altering the hydrology and sediment flow, affecting the natural aquatic species and systems (UNEP-WCMC, 2012; power-technology.com). In addition, the 2022 Joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission (RMM) found that the reservoir of BGHES will extend approximately 10.75 km into the property at full supply level, which at the deepest point will increase the water level in the property by around 43m, thereby altering the unique gorge ecosystem and water flow (UNESCO, 2022). In 2024, the States Parties committed to revising the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) for the BGHES in alignment with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context (States Parties of Zambia and Zimbabwe, 2024). This commitment followed concerns raised by the Committee regarding the project's inevitable negative impacts on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), particularly due to seasonal water level rises and the partial disappearance of some swash within sections of the gorges. The Committee requested the States Parties to implement the 2022 RMM recommendation to revise the ESIA in accordance with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context to undertake a comprehensive geomorphological and/or geological assessment of the gorge environment that takes into account the property boundaries, and resubmit the revised ESIA to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN before making any decisions that may be difficult to reverse in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines (UNESCO, 2024).
The property faces several potential threats that could significantly impact its OUV. Excessive tourist use is a major concern, as the site is already experiencing high visitor numbers, with over 200,000 visitors annually in Zambia alone, raising fears of exceeding the site's carrying capacity and further straining its ecological and aesthetic integrity. A significant threat is posed by the tourism facilities to house these visitors, which are ever pushing closer to the waterfall. Additionally, upstream water abstraction poses a potential threat, particularly from irrigation schemes in the Zambezi catchment, which could reduce dry season water flows by 5-10%, further exacerbating the already observed declines in water levels due to climate change and hydro-power generation. These potential threats highlight the need for proactive management, including visitor capacity limits and regional water management strategies, to safeguard the site's OUV.
Recreational Activities
(Excessive tourist use)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Tourism infrastructures are already posing a threat at present, and there are concerns over the visitor carrying capacity (UNESCO and IUCN, 2006; UNESCO, 2007; States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). According to third-party sources, the South Bank rainforest (Zimbabwe) recorded a total of 279,786 international visitors and 77,766 national visitors in 2019. This compares with 263,381 and 75,091, respectively, in 2018 (IUCN Consultation, 2020). In Zambia, the Victoria Falls received over 200,000 visitors in 2018 compared with 133,364 in 2017 (idem). More recent reports indicate that tourist numbers are expected to increase following COVID-19 declines to higher than pre-COVID rates. In 2024, Zimparks reported an average of 1,300 visitors to the site daily, a 30% increase from the year before, and lodges in the site report that 2024 was a higher year of booking compared to 2018/2019 (Nyeve, 2024; Nyaungwa, 2024). The Zimbabwe Government sees the waterfall as being a magnet for investment and income, and the city of Victoria Falls is expected to expand both southwards and westwards (VFCC Master Plan, Written Statement 2024). A significant part of this expansion is tourism-related, and optimism is high with the current development of a 10,000-seater cricket stadium south of the city. The relatively small Rainforest will need to find ways of dealing with the influx of tourism, especially if it wishes to maintain the quality of the experience.
Dams & Water Management/Use
(Upstream water abstraction and use)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
The Zambezi catchment covers a large part of western Zambia and south-west Angola, much of which may be suitable for irrigation, leading to water abstraction. As reported in the 2010 feasibility study, an irrigation scheme in Botswana, which would abstract an additional 495 million cubic meters of water per annum, representing 5-10% of dry season flow at the falls, could potentially have a negative impact on the property’s OUV (UNESCO, 2014). However, no further updated information is available. The State Party of Zambia has reduced water abstraction from the Zambezi River in recent years (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2016).
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
The governance and management of the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Site have increasingly emphasized the involvement of Indigenous peoples and local communities in decision-making processes. Notably, the Leya people of Mukuni, who have a long-standing historical connection to the area, are recognized as key stakeholders in the site's management. Their deep-rooted cultural ties to the falls underscore the importance of integrating Indigenous perspectives into conservation strategies (Chapters, 2023).
Many of the economic benefits derived from the property accrue to local people employed in tourism-related services and activities outside the site. The States Parties of Zambia and Zimbabwe have employed the Public Private Partnership (PPP) principle to promote stakeholder participation for the effective management of the property. To attain the desired outcome, tourist infrastructures such as gift shops and restaurants within the property have been leased out to the public sector to provide tourists’ goods and services to visiting tourists (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Management has also engaged the private sector to partner in funding conservation works and support management initiatives, which also benefit their businesses. The deliberate inclusion of the private sector in the management of the property has fostered mutual trust and confidence between the private and the public in managing the property (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
To enhance community stewardship, management frameworks have adopted critical stakeholder engagement strategies. These strategies aim to involve all relevant parties, from governmental authorities of Zambia and Zimbabwe to local communities in planning and decision-making processes. Such collaborative efforts are designed to foster a sense of ownership among local populations, thereby promoting the safeguarding of the site's natural and cultural heritage (Panorama, 2023). This participatory approach not only empowers local communities but also ensures that conservation initiatives are culturally appropriate and socially equitable.
Many of the economic benefits derived from the property accrue to local people employed in tourism-related services and activities outside the site. The States Parties of Zambia and Zimbabwe have employed the Public Private Partnership (PPP) principle to promote stakeholder participation for the effective management of the property. To attain the desired outcome, tourist infrastructures such as gift shops and restaurants within the property have been leased out to the public sector to provide tourists’ goods and services to visiting tourists (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Management has also engaged the private sector to partner in funding conservation works and support management initiatives, which also benefit their businesses. The deliberate inclusion of the private sector in the management of the property has fostered mutual trust and confidence between the private and the public in managing the property (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
To enhance community stewardship, management frameworks have adopted critical stakeholder engagement strategies. These strategies aim to involve all relevant parties, from governmental authorities of Zambia and Zimbabwe to local communities in planning and decision-making processes. Such collaborative efforts are designed to foster a sense of ownership among local populations, thereby promoting the safeguarding of the site's natural and cultural heritage (Panorama, 2023). This participatory approach not only empowers local communities but also ensures that conservation initiatives are culturally appropriate and socially equitable.
Legal framework
Mosi-Oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls has been protected as a National Monument by the States Parties of Zambia and Zimbabwe using respective legal instruments since the 1930s. By 1937, the Victoria Falls National Park on the Southern Rhodesian side (now Zimbabwe) was established and administered by the Forestry Commission at this time; the falls were divided into the Southern Bank (Zimbabwean side) and the Northern Bank (Zambian side) (Zulu 2020:2). On the Zimbabwean side, protection of the site is provided under Zimbabwe’s Parks and Wildlife Act, National Museums and Monuments Act, Environmental Management Act, Tourism Act and Forestry Act. In Zambia, the National Heritage Conservation Act and the Wildlife Act, the Zambia Environmental Agency Act, the Town and Country Planning Acts, the Public Health Acts, the Forests Act, and the Energy Regulation Acts are used in the management of the property. Other legal documents developed by the two States Parties are the Joint Integrated Management Plan (2016-2022), the Joint Sustainable Tourism Plan (JSTP) 2017, and the Joint Sustainable Financing and Business Plan (JSFBP) 2019 being developed (IUCN Consultation, 2020). In 2024, the States Parties have revised the JIMP with funding from UNESCO under the International Assistance Requests Program and co-financed by the two States Parties (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). The document is pending finalisation and approval. The national parks on both sides have management plans (Zimbabwe, 2024 and Zambia, in preparation).
Governance arrangements
Spanning the border between Zambia and Zimbabwe, the property is managed through a collaborative governance framework involving both nations. This transboundary approach ensures that conservation efforts are harmonized across the entire property, recognizing its ecological and cultural significance. A pivotal element of this framework is the Joint Integrated Management Plan (JIMP) for the period 2016 to 2021, which was developed to guide sustainable management practices within the site. The JIMP emphasizes coordinated actions between the two countries to address challenges such as tourism pressure, environmental conservation, and the protection of the site's Outstanding Universal Value (UNESCO, 2023). However, reports indicate that the full implementation of the plan has faced challenges due to resource limitations and confusion over zonal boundaries (see Management plan and overall management system) and the need for greater community involvement (UNESCO, 2023). In 2024, the States Parties revised the JIMP, and it is now waiting for approvals (with a deadline extended to the end of June 2025). The process was funded by the UNESCO WHC under the International Assistance Requests Program and co-financed by the two States Parties (States Parties Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). The Committee requested the States Parties to finalize and approve the JIMP as soon as possible and to ensure that it incorporates necessary safeguards and thresholds to mitigate against developmental pressures for the protection of the property’s OUV, and zonation of the property, including well prescribed limits of use and permissible activities (including infrastructure), in line with the objectives of protecting the OUV and with past Committee decisions (UNESCO, 2024). Central to the governance structure is the principle of critical stakeholder engagement, which involves incorporating the perspectives and participation of key stakeholders and rights holders, including local communities, governmental authorities, and institutional bodies from both Zambia and Zimbabwe. This inclusive approach aims to foster community stewardship and ensure that decision-making processes are both participatory and reflective of the diverse interests associated with the site. By engaging local communities in planning and management activities, the governance framework seeks to promote the safeguarding of the site's natural and cultural heritage (Panorama, 2023). Strengthening this collaborative approach, along with enhancing resource allocation and capacity-building programs, is essential for the long-term preservation of the property.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
The integration of the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Site into local, regional, and national planning systems has been significantly enhanced through its inclusion in the Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA). Established in 2011, KAZA TFCA encompasses regions of Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia, and Zimbabwe, creating one of the world's largest conservation areas. This transboundary initiative aims to promote biodiversity conservation, facilitate wildlife movement across borders, and bolster socio-economic development through sustainable tourism. The fact that the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls is within this expansive conservation landscape, the site benefits from coordinated management efforts that transcend national boundaries, ensuring inputs into the preservation of its Outstanding Universal Value (Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area, 2023). At the national and local levels, Zambia and Zimbabwe have developed joint management plans to harmonize conservation strategies and land-use planning for the World Heritage Site (now into its third iteration). These collaborative efforts involve critical stakeholder engagement, incorporating input from governmental authorities, local communities, and other relevant actors. Such inclusive planning processes aim to foster community stewardship and ensure that development initiatives align with conservation objectives, thereby maintaining the site's ecological integrity and cultural significance (Chanda, 2016).
Boundaries
The States Parties originally nominated an area much larger than is currently inscribed on the World Heritage List. The area that was nominated covered all of Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park (Zambia), Zambezi National Park (Zimbabwe), and Victoria Falls National Park (Zimbabwe), totaling 65,180 ha. The 1989 IUCN Evaluation however noted that while the larger area is important for the protection of the property and its watershed, it bears little functional relationship to the Falls itself and the downstream gorges, and recommended that the limits of the property be defined by the southern half of Mosi-oa-Tunya, a small riverine section of Zambezi National Park, and all of Victoria Falls National Park. The World Heritage Committee approved the inscription of the property on the basis that the States Parties reach an agreement on final boundaries and report back to the Committee the
subsequent year (Decision CONF 004 XV.A).
Available records show that the final boundaries were not submitted and finalized as per the 1989 Committee Decision, and it was only in 2012 through the Retrospective Inventory report that the boundaries were next discussed. Subsequent submissions of the property boundary maps by the States Parties for state of conservation reporting and Joint Integrated Management Plans (JIMPs) during the period from 2012 to 2021 revealed multiple variations of the property and buffer zone boundaries used in different documents.
The 2022 joint UNESCO/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property recommended that the States Parties provide a map indicating the precise boundaries of the property and its buffer zone, agreed upon by both States Parties and aligned with the recommendations in the IUCN evaluation and past World Heritage Committee requests, to be used in all future planning, strategy, and policy documents. This should include the proposed internal zoning in high, medium, and low ecologically sensitive zones, along with their rationale and the management implications of this zoning. A clear explanation of how the buffer zone protects the property should also be provided (UNESCO and IUCN, 2022). Further to that recommendation, the Committee requested the States Parties to submit a request for a boundary modification in accordance with the Operational Guidelines to set the precise boundaries of the property and its buffer zone, aligned with past Committee Decisions and the property’s Statement of OUV and including details of the internal zonation system and its rationale to protect the property and its OUV (UNESCO, 2023). This request is in preparation and will be submitted (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024).
subsequent year (Decision CONF 004 XV.A).
Available records show that the final boundaries were not submitted and finalized as per the 1989 Committee Decision, and it was only in 2012 through the Retrospective Inventory report that the boundaries were next discussed. Subsequent submissions of the property boundary maps by the States Parties for state of conservation reporting and Joint Integrated Management Plans (JIMPs) during the period from 2012 to 2021 revealed multiple variations of the property and buffer zone boundaries used in different documents.
The 2022 joint UNESCO/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the property recommended that the States Parties provide a map indicating the precise boundaries of the property and its buffer zone, agreed upon by both States Parties and aligned with the recommendations in the IUCN evaluation and past World Heritage Committee requests, to be used in all future planning, strategy, and policy documents. This should include the proposed internal zoning in high, medium, and low ecologically sensitive zones, along with their rationale and the management implications of this zoning. A clear explanation of how the buffer zone protects the property should also be provided (UNESCO and IUCN, 2022). Further to that recommendation, the Committee requested the States Parties to submit a request for a boundary modification in accordance with the Operational Guidelines to set the precise boundaries of the property and its buffer zone, aligned with past Committee Decisions and the property’s Statement of OUV and including details of the internal zonation system and its rationale to protect the property and its OUV (UNESCO, 2023). This request is in preparation and will be submitted (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024).
Overlapping international designations
The Victoria Falls National Park Ramsar Site and the Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls World Heritage Site significantly overlap, both encompassing the renowned Victoria Falls and surrounding ecosystems. The Ramsar Site, designated in 2013, covers 1,750 hectares and is located in Zimbabwe's Matabeleland North Province. It features unique vegetation such as mopane forests and miombo woodlands and supports diverse wildlife, including elephants, buffalo, lions, leopards, and black rhinoceros (Ramsar, 2013). The Ramsar description currently available on the site is in need of serious attention. The map provided shows the area as being south of the Masuwe River, while it refers to the whole of the Victoria Falls NP. The written description of the values is also in need of attention (e.g., black rhinoceros and miombo woodland, area covered)
The World Heritage Site spans both banks of the Zambezi River, incorporating Zimbabwe's Victoria Falls National Park and Zambia's Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park. Maps show that the Ramsar Site falls entirely within the boundaries of the World Heritage Site, suggesting a complete overlap of the Ramsar site, but not of the WHS (according to the assessment definition of overlap). The level to which the management is effectively coordinated across the Ramsar and WH sites is unclear.
The World Heritage Site spans both banks of the Zambezi River, incorporating Zimbabwe's Victoria Falls National Park and Zambia's Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park. Maps show that the Ramsar Site falls entirely within the boundaries of the World Heritage Site, suggesting a complete overlap of the Ramsar site, but not of the WHS (according to the assessment definition of overlap). The level to which the management is effectively coordinated across the Ramsar and WH sites is unclear.
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Although implementation is often slow, key Committee decisions and recommendations have generally
been addressed to some extent.
been addressed to some extent.
Climate action
Climate change poses a significant threat to the site, with potential impacts including altered rainfall patterns, reduced water flow, and increased temperatures, which could affect the ecological integrity and aesthetic value of the falls. The property has experienced significant climate variability in recent years, notably during the severe drought of 2019. This event led to a substantial reduction in the Zambezi River's flow, dramatically diminishing the volume of water cascading over the falls and raising concerns about the broader implications of climate change on the region's hydrology (The Guardian, 2019). The management plan for the site, as outlined in the 2016-2021 Joint Integrated Management Plan (JIMP) for the Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls World Heritage Site, included provisions to address climate change impacts. The plan emphasizes the need for adaptive management strategies, such as monitoring water levels, vegetation health, and wildlife populations, to safeguard the OUV from climate-related threats (Zambia Wildlife Authority & Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, 2020). However, specific climate adaptation measures are not extensively detailed, indicating a need for more targeted actions to mitigate climate risks.
A system to measure and monitor the effects of climate change on the OUV is partially in place, with both Zambia and Zimbabwe collaborating on hydrological and ecological monitoring. For instance, the Zambezi River Authority monitors water flow and rainfall patterns, which are critical indicators of climate change impacts on the falls (Zambezi River Authority, 2021). Additionally, UNESCO collaborated with experts from James Cook University in 2022 to pilot an online climate vulnerability training course for Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls (UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2022). This initiative aimed to enhance the capacity of site managers to assess climate vulnerabilities and develop adaptive management strategies. The training focused on equipping conservation teams with tools to monitor climate-related impacts and implement mitigation measures such as ecosystem restoration, improved water management, and sustainable tourism practices (UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2022). Such efforts are crucial in ensuring that the site is prepared for, and can adapt to, future climate change impacts while maintaining its ecological and cultural significance. However, there is limited evidence of innovative climate mitigation or adaptation technologies being implemented at the site. Strengthening climate communication and integrating climate innovation into management practices could further enhance the site's role in global climate action. Overall, while progress has been made, more robust and specific measures are needed to fully protect the OUV from climate change and align the site with global climate goals (UNESCO, 2023).
A system to measure and monitor the effects of climate change on the OUV is partially in place, with both Zambia and Zimbabwe collaborating on hydrological and ecological monitoring. For instance, the Zambezi River Authority monitors water flow and rainfall patterns, which are critical indicators of climate change impacts on the falls (Zambezi River Authority, 2021). Additionally, UNESCO collaborated with experts from James Cook University in 2022 to pilot an online climate vulnerability training course for Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls (UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2022). This initiative aimed to enhance the capacity of site managers to assess climate vulnerabilities and develop adaptive management strategies. The training focused on equipping conservation teams with tools to monitor climate-related impacts and implement mitigation measures such as ecosystem restoration, improved water management, and sustainable tourism practices (UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2022). Such efforts are crucial in ensuring that the site is prepared for, and can adapt to, future climate change impacts while maintaining its ecological and cultural significance. However, there is limited evidence of innovative climate mitigation or adaptation technologies being implemented at the site. Strengthening climate communication and integrating climate innovation into management practices could further enhance the site's role in global climate action. Overall, while progress has been made, more robust and specific measures are needed to fully protect the OUV from climate change and align the site with global climate goals (UNESCO, 2023).
Management plan and overall management system
Spanning between Zambia and Zimbabwe, the property has for years sustained peaceful bilateral relations between both States Parties thanks to well-developed management structures. The established structures are comprised of joint ministerial, joint technical, and joint site management committees (Zulu 2023). Both nations have implemented joint integrated management plans that incorporate multiple stakeholders, including national park authorities, local law enforcement agencies, and community representatives, to monitor and enforce regulations within and around the site (CBD, 2014). The most recent Joint Integrated Management Plan (2016-2021) expired in 2021 and was updated during 2023/2024. However, the document has not yet been approved (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024).
The first Joint Integrated Management Plan for the site was approved in 2007, 18 years after inscription. This laid out the zones based on ecological principles. The revision of the JIMP in 2016 made significant changes in the zonal boundaries, some of which appeared to degrade the ability to manage the site in the face of emerging pressures, especially from tourism. In addition, the written zonal descriptions were difficult to follow and did not match the maps, and alarmingly, the Zimbabwean Rain Forest ended up being downgraded to a “yellow zone” with fewer management and development restrictions than as a “red zone”. This led to concessions for lodge sites and restaurants being allocated on the Zimbabwean side, along with the emergence of a ZimParks entertainment centre less than 500 metres upstream of the waterfall. Although the JIMP has been in existence since 2007 (again, 18 years), there has been little adherence to its provisions, especially regarding the “red zone,” and the past two decades have seen the emergence of at least seven hotels/camps with over 400 beds and four restaurants in areas where development should have been restricted. The revision of the JIMP in 2024 saw the reconciliation of the zones to reflect the original intent in 2012, along with detailed descriptions and maps. Although the deadline for this document was extended for a year (to May 2025), the zonal map was adopted for inclusion in the Zambezi/Victoria National Park Management Plan of 2023 (ZPWMA, 2023). The confusion over zonal boundaries and permitted developments has allowed the emergence of infrastructure that has seriously eroded the aesthetic values of the site, on both sides of the river.
Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park (MoTNP) was established under Zambia’s National Parks and Wildlife Act of 1969. The areas of the park that fall within the World Heritage boundaries are managed by the National Heritage Conservation Commission (NHCC) in line with the provisions in the JIMP. The remaining areas of the park are managed by the Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) according to a separate National Park management plan. Both NHCC and DNPW are a part of the Ministry of Tourism and Arts. Any development or activity proposals fall under the responsibility of the Zambian Environmental Management Authority (ZEMA) under the Environmental Management Act no. 12 of 2011 (UNESCO and IUCN, 2022). The Zambezi National Park and the Victoria Falls National Park (VFNP) in Zimbabwe were established under the Parks and Wildlife Act of 1975, and are both managed by the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZPWMA) under the Ministry of Environment, Climate, Tourism, and Hospitality. A management plan for both parks was approved in 2024. All developments are required to have an environmental assessment from the Environmental Management Agency (EMA) in line with the Environmental Management Act Chapter 20/27 of 2002 (UNESCO and IUCN, 2022). There is some confusion as to whether the JIMP takes precedence over the individual management plans, which points to the need to develop these in tandem with the JIMP to avoid conflicting strategies or objectives.
The first Joint Integrated Management Plan for the site was approved in 2007, 18 years after inscription. This laid out the zones based on ecological principles. The revision of the JIMP in 2016 made significant changes in the zonal boundaries, some of which appeared to degrade the ability to manage the site in the face of emerging pressures, especially from tourism. In addition, the written zonal descriptions were difficult to follow and did not match the maps, and alarmingly, the Zimbabwean Rain Forest ended up being downgraded to a “yellow zone” with fewer management and development restrictions than as a “red zone”. This led to concessions for lodge sites and restaurants being allocated on the Zimbabwean side, along with the emergence of a ZimParks entertainment centre less than 500 metres upstream of the waterfall. Although the JIMP has been in existence since 2007 (again, 18 years), there has been little adherence to its provisions, especially regarding the “red zone,” and the past two decades have seen the emergence of at least seven hotels/camps with over 400 beds and four restaurants in areas where development should have been restricted. The revision of the JIMP in 2024 saw the reconciliation of the zones to reflect the original intent in 2012, along with detailed descriptions and maps. Although the deadline for this document was extended for a year (to May 2025), the zonal map was adopted for inclusion in the Zambezi/Victoria National Park Management Plan of 2023 (ZPWMA, 2023). The confusion over zonal boundaries and permitted developments has allowed the emergence of infrastructure that has seriously eroded the aesthetic values of the site, on both sides of the river.
Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park (MoTNP) was established under Zambia’s National Parks and Wildlife Act of 1969. The areas of the park that fall within the World Heritage boundaries are managed by the National Heritage Conservation Commission (NHCC) in line with the provisions in the JIMP. The remaining areas of the park are managed by the Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) according to a separate National Park management plan. Both NHCC and DNPW are a part of the Ministry of Tourism and Arts. Any development or activity proposals fall under the responsibility of the Zambian Environmental Management Authority (ZEMA) under the Environmental Management Act no. 12 of 2011 (UNESCO and IUCN, 2022). The Zambezi National Park and the Victoria Falls National Park (VFNP) in Zimbabwe were established under the Parks and Wildlife Act of 1975, and are both managed by the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZPWMA) under the Ministry of Environment, Climate, Tourism, and Hospitality. A management plan for both parks was approved in 2024. All developments are required to have an environmental assessment from the Environmental Management Agency (EMA) in line with the Environmental Management Act Chapter 20/27 of 2002 (UNESCO and IUCN, 2022). There is some confusion as to whether the JIMP takes precedence over the individual management plans, which points to the need to develop these in tandem with the JIMP to avoid conflicting strategies or objectives.
Law enforcement
The property benefits from a relatively strong legal framework collaboratively managed by Zambia and Zimbabwe, designed to effectively detect and address illegal activities. Both nations have implemented joint integrated management plans that incorporate multiple stakeholders, including national park authorities, local law enforcement agencies, and community representatives, to monitor and enforce regulations within and around the site (CBD, 2014). The most recent Joint Integrated Management Plan (2016-2021) expired in 2021 and has been updated but not yet approved (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). This collaborative approach enhances the capacity for regular patrols and enforcement activities, ensuring that infractions are promptly identified and addressed. The establishment of the Joint Site Management Committee (JSMC) facilitates coordinated efforts in law enforcement and resource management, contributing to the site's overall protection (CBD, 2014). However, challenges remain in ensuring adequate resources and personnel to cover the conservation area effectively
Sustainable finance
There is no information on budget allocations, but they are clearly inadequate. Nevertheless, there would appear to be considerable scope for self-financing from park entry fees and other retained revenues if a proper pricing and revenue retention scheme were developed as part of a sustainable financing strategy. The two States Parties reportedly are developing a Joint Sustainable Financing and Business Plan, with a focus on creating multiple income streams to aid the protection of property’s OUV and increase the socio- economic benefits of conservation for local communities. The plan aims to address issues of benefit sharing and participation in day-to-day conservation with the immediate communities living around the property (Zulu, 2023). However, there is no updated available on this plan. Additionally, to bolster sustainable finance, the Mosi Oa Tunya Development Company (MOTDC) was established to spearhead tourism infrastructure development in Victoria Falls. MOTDC owns a 271.5-hectare property in Victoria Falls and aims to develop it into a world-class integrated tourism resort (Mosi Oa Tunya, 2023). This initiative seeks to attract private investment and diversify tourism offerings, thereby increasing revenue streams for conservation and community development. By integrating sustainable practices into tourism development, the site aims to balance economic growth with environmental preservation, ensuring the long-term protection of its Outstanding Universal Value (Mosi Oa Tunya, 2023). However, in practice this may be difficult as the demand for income may outweigh the need to protect the site.
Staff capacity, training and development
Serious staffing problems have been reported in the past, including high staff turnover, political appointments, and prolonged staff vacancies in the management authorities of both countries (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). In 2018, the States Parties reported that extensive staff capacity training, public awareness and education activities have been undertaken (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2018) but these need to be ongoing activities.
Education and interpretation programmes
There are visitor interpretation centres on both sides of the property, but these were considered ‘very basic and poor’ by the 2006 mission (UNESCO and IUCN, 2006). The one on the Zambian side was focused on early settlement in the area, rather than the values of the World Heritage site. Subsequently, both visitor centres have been upgraded, and the one on the Zimbabwe side now showcases the Outstanding Universal Values of the property in a meaningful and engaging display (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012). In 2023, the States Parties of Zambia and Zimbabwe actively celebrated the Africa World Heritage Day by cleaning up the site, by involving stakeholders and explaining to them the importance of protecting and upholding the OUV of the property with the active participation of local authorities (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). Unfortunately, information about the WHS is lacking outside the key tourism attractions (rainforest). For example, there are no maps or billboards showcasing the site and its importance in the two adjacent cities. It is likely that many local residents know very little about the world heritage status and many probably have not visited the waterfall, largely for financial constraints. More could be done to raise awareness in the local area.
Tourism and visitation management
Being one of the Seven Natural Wonders of the World, the property is a globally renowned tourist destination. Hundreds of thousands of tourists visit the property annually from different parts of the world. Currently, despite tourists paying a lot of money to reach the destination, some are unable to view both sides of the property because of prevailing immigration rules in the respective States Parties. Tourists are subjected to time-consuming border formalities and visa payments to access either side of the property. Tourists know that the falls are in one State Party, as opposed to being transnational; this has disadvantaged the property, the communities living around it and the tourists. This property is a single entity but divided by an ‘imaginary political line’, which should not be the case. Local and international tourists must be able to access the entire property without difficulty because this is a single attraction (Zulu, 2023). To effectively manage and conserve the natural and cultural values of the property, the 2017 Joint Sustainable Tourism Plan was developed to guide the tourism development and marketing of the destination by the States Parties but this document is not readily available. The development of this plan was guided by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and the JIMP (2016-2021) and aims to create mutual benefits from tourism for the local communities, while promoting landscape-level ecosystem management and transnational initiatives to mitigate its negative impacts (Zulu, 2023). In 2023, the Committee reiterated its concern over the increasing pressure from tourism infrastructure within and around the property, exacerbated by the absence of strategic planning and also requested the States Parties to prioritize the review and update the Joint Integrated Management Plan (JIMP) to ensure that necessary safeguards and thresholds are incorporated to mitigate against developmental pressures for the protection of the property’s OUV (UNESCO, 2023). The JIMP has been reviewed and awaits approval.
Sustainable use
The main uses of the property are hydro-electric power generation and tourism. The critical issue is water abstraction by the power station during the dry season when river flow rates are low and the amount required is often more than half the total. An arbitrary decision to limit water abstraction for five hours daily during the dry season, aimed at allowing water to pass over the western cataract during peak visitor hours, has been taken (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012).
Regarding visitor carrying capacity, an attempt has been made to establish an upper limit (6,000 visitors/day, States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012), but this is based on questionable assumptions such as a one-hour duration for each visit. However, in practice there does not appear to any restrictions on entries, something that will become a serious concern as visitor numbers increase. In addition there are now viewing activities from the lip of the waterfall in both Zambia and Zimbabwe at low water, something that can only serve to detract from the aesthetic values of the site.
Regarding visitor carrying capacity, an attempt has been made to establish an upper limit (6,000 visitors/day, States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2012), but this is based on questionable assumptions such as a one-hour duration for each visit. However, in practice there does not appear to any restrictions on entries, something that will become a serious concern as visitor numbers increase. In addition there are now viewing activities from the lip of the waterfall in both Zambia and Zimbabwe at low water, something that can only serve to detract from the aesthetic values of the site.
Monitoring
The States Parties have produced a concrete and time-bound Action Plan for joint activities for the 2019-2020 period, which improves monitoring and informs management activities (UNESCO, 2019). Monitoring of water flow of the Zambezi River upstream of the fall has been ongoing. The States Party of Zambia has additionally strengthened automated monitoring of the water level towards further reducing water abstraction from the property (UNESCO, 2017). The property is also an Important Bird Area which attracts keen bird enthusiasts from both States Parties and around the world. Bird surveys are conducted twice a year, in January and in the month of July. Vulture aerial Survey: On an annual basis vulture survey in Zambezi National Park and adjacent protected areas are conducted. The Survey focuses on vulture nesting site distribution and success. The survey is conducted in collaboration with stakeholders such as the Victoria Falls Wildlife Trust (Zulu, 2023). Monitoring of elephants is also an on-going activity in the two States Parties and various conflict mitigation strategies in and around the property are implemented including community sensitization on animal behavior (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). However, despite the magnitude and unique values of the property, there has not been collective research and systematic monitoring of challenges such as the cumulative effect of tourism developments and activities, deforestation, river-bank erosion, climate change/variation, human and wildlife conflict or control of invasive alien species, to name but a few. While the States Parties of Zambia and Zimbabwe have been undertaking joint monitoring exercises to collect data on property values and attributes, they also need to undertake more collaborative ventures in monitoring and research resulting in publications. Implementing this would not only improve cordial relations between the States Parties but provide vital information required to effectively manage the transnational property (Zulu, 2023).
Research
The States Parties have produced a concrete and time-bound Action Plan for joint activities for the 2019-2020 period, which improves monitoring and informs management activities (UNESCO, 2019). Monitoring of the water flow of the Zambezi River upstream of the falls has been ongoing. The State Party of Zambia has additionally strengthened automated monitoring of the water level towards further reducing water abstraction from the property (UNESCO, 2017). The property is also an Important Bird Area which attracts keen bird enthusiasts from both States Parties and around the world. Bird surveys are conducted twice a year, in January and in the month of July. Vulture Aerial Survey: On an annual basis, vulture surveys in Zambezi National Park and adjacent protected areas are conducted. The Survey focuses on vulture nesting site distribution and success. The survey is conducted in collaboration with stakeholders such as the Victoria Falls Wildlife Trust (Zulu, 2023). Monitoring of elephants is also an ongoing activity in the two States Parties, and various conflict mitigation strategies in and around the property are implemented, including community sensitization on animal behavior (States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe, 2024). However, despite the magnitude and unique values of the property, there has not been collective research and systematic monitoring of challenges such as the cumulative effect of tourism developments and activities, deforestation, river-bank erosion, climate change/variation, human and wildlife conflict, or control of invasive alien species, to name but a few. While the States Parties of Zambia and Zimbabwe have been undertaking joint monitoring exercises to collect data on property values and attributes, they also need to undertake more collaborative ventures in monitoring and research, resulting in publications. Implementing this would not only improve cordial relations between the States Parties but also provide vital information required to effectively manage the transnational property (Zulu, 2023).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
The effectiveness of the management system and governance in addressing threats outside Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls is limited, as external pressures such as urban growth, upstream water abstraction, and regional development projects (e.g., the Batoka Gorge Hydro Electric Scheme) pose significant risks to the site. While the States Parties have engaged in transboundary cooperation and integrated the site into broader regional initiatives like the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA), there is insufficient evidence of robust mechanisms to mitigate external threats. The lack of detailed monitoring and adaptive management strategies for upstream water use and regional infrastructure development highlights gaps in addressing these external pressures. Strengthened regional collaboration and more proactive measures are needed to effectively manage and mitigate threats originating outside the property.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
The management system and governance of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls demonstrate a strong collaborative transboundary approach between Zambia and Zimbabwe, with joint management plans and stakeholder engagement, including indigenous communities and private sector involvement. However, challenges persist, such as the delayed approval of the 2024-2029 Joint Integrated Management Plan (JIMP) and insufficient resources for enforcement and monitoring. While efforts have been made to address threats like tourism pressure, illegal activities, and climate change, the lack of detailed climate adaptation measures and systematic monitoring of key issues like deforestation and invasive species indicates gaps in effectiveness. The governance framework shows potential but requires stronger implementation, resource allocation, and integration of adaptive strategies to fully mitigate threats and protect the site's Outstanding Universal Value.
The overall state of protection and management of the property reflects a mixed picture of collaborative efforts and significant challenges. The site benefits from a transboundary governance framework between Zambia and Zimbabwe, with joint management plans and stakeholder engagement, including indigenous communities and private sector involvement. However, the delayed approval of the 2024-2029 Joint Integrated Management Plan (JIMP) and insufficient resources for implementation, enforcement of zones and development protocols, and monitoring hinder effective management. Internal threats such as significant tourism pressure, illegal activities (poaching, fishing, and logging), and climate change impacts are partially addressed, but gaps remain in systematic monitoring and adaptive strategies for issues like deforestation, invasive species, and climate variability. The site’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) is under pressure from both internal and external factors, with limited evidence of robust mechanisms to mitigate threats originating outside the property. External threats beyond the control of the management authority, such as urban growth in adjoining areas, upstream water abstraction, and regional development projects like the Batoka Gorge Hydro Electric Scheme, pose significant risks. While the site is integrated into broader regional initiatives like the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA), there is insufficient evidence of proactive measures to address these external pressures. Biodiversity values, including critical habitats for species like the Taita Falcon and other bird species, are under threat from habitat degradation and invasive species. Overall, while the management framework shows potential, stronger implementation, resource allocation, and regional collaboration are needed to effectively address both internal and external threats and ensure the long-term protection of the site’s OUV and biodiversity.
Largest curtain of falling water
High Concern
Trend
Stable
The falls and their immediate environment remain essentially intact, but there are concerns over reduced flows over the falls at critical times of the year due to continued periodic drought and abstraction of water for hydro-electric power generation, though efforts have been increased in recent years to reduce abstraction. 2019/2020 saw significantly lower than average dry season river flow levels linked to lower rainfall across the wider catchment. During this period, the Zambezi River's flow diminished substantially, leading to a dramatic reduction in the volume of water cascading over the falls. This unprecedented decline not only altered the visual spectacle of the falls but also raised concerns about the broader implications of climate change on the region's hydrology. Reports indicated that the 2019 drought was one of the worst in a century, with water levels at Victoria Falls dropping to their lowest recorded levels, intensifying fears about long-term climate variability and its effects on both the ecosystem and local economies. The recurrence of droughts underscores the urgency for adaptive management strategies to mitigate their impacts on both natural systems and human livelihoods. This also emphasizes the importance of regional cooperation and sustainable water management policies to address the long-term challenges posed by climate change and extreme weather patterns in the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls region.
Outstanding natural phenomenon supporting important species and ecosystems
Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
There are increasing concerns over the loss of wilderness and aesthetic values due to inappropriate tourism developments. These include construction of hotels and lodges on the riverbanks and in the non-development area of the WHS “red zone”; spoiling the visual integrity of the property with tall structures nearby; noise pollution, especially from light aircraft, and motor boats; and expanding urban settlements adjoining the property. Cumulatively, these developments have the potential to seriously degrade the aesthetic and conservation values of the site, which may have far-reaching impacts on its marketing.
As a consequence of climate change, periodic drought also affects the property. The ecological consequences of such droughts extend beyond the falls themselves, affecting the surrounding ecosystems and biodiversity. Reduced water availability can lead to habitat loss for aquatic and terrestrial species, increased competition for dwindling resources, and heightened vulnerability to wildfires.
The property is also an Important Bird Area as the downstream gorges serve as breeding habitat for the globally threatened Taita Falcon. Other breeding species of interest include black stork, Verreaux's eagle, and African black swift. Along the river above the falls, white-backed night heron, African finfoot, African skimmer, and rock pratincole breed. It's reported that bird surveys are conducted twice a year, in January and in the month of July. Vulture Aerial Survey: Annual vulture surveys focusing on vulture nesting site distribution and success in Zambezi National Park and adjacent protected areas are conducted. However, there is a lack of detailed data on the current abundance and distribution of the bird species occurring at the property. Illegal activities, including illegal hunting, fishing, and logging, also negatively affect the property. Without stronger monitoring and alternative livelihood programs for local communities, poaching could further degrade the ecological integrity of the site (Zulu, 2023).
As a consequence of climate change, periodic drought also affects the property. The ecological consequences of such droughts extend beyond the falls themselves, affecting the surrounding ecosystems and biodiversity. Reduced water availability can lead to habitat loss for aquatic and terrestrial species, increased competition for dwindling resources, and heightened vulnerability to wildfires.
The property is also an Important Bird Area as the downstream gorges serve as breeding habitat for the globally threatened Taita Falcon. Other breeding species of interest include black stork, Verreaux's eagle, and African black swift. Along the river above the falls, white-backed night heron, African finfoot, African skimmer, and rock pratincole breed. It's reported that bird surveys are conducted twice a year, in January and in the month of July. Vulture Aerial Survey: Annual vulture surveys focusing on vulture nesting site distribution and success in Zambezi National Park and adjacent protected areas are conducted. However, there is a lack of detailed data on the current abundance and distribution of the bird species occurring at the property. Illegal activities, including illegal hunting, fishing, and logging, also negatively affect the property. Without stronger monitoring and alternative livelihood programs for local communities, poaching could further degrade the ecological integrity of the site (Zulu, 2023).
Ongoing geological process
Good
Trend
Stable
The erosive forces of the river and ongoing geological processes have not been significantly altered and are considered essentially intact.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
The largest curtain of falling water, a key attribute of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls, has experienced significant challenges over the past years due to climate change and human activities. Unprecedented declines in water flow were recorded during the 2019/2020 drought, one of the worst in a century. Reduced rainfall in the Zambezi River catchment led to dramatically lower dry season flows, diminishing the visual spectacle of the falls and raising concerns about long-term climate variability. While efforts to reduce water abstraction for hydroelectric power have been implemented, the recurrence of droughts underscores the urgent need for adaptive management strategies and regional cooperation to mitigate the impacts of climate change on the site's hydrology and aesthetic value. The outstanding natural phenomenon supporting important species and ecosystems is also affected by several threats. Inappropriate tourism developments, such as the construction of hotels and lodges on riverbanks, have compromised the wilderness and aesthetic values of the site. Noise pollution from aircraft and motorboats, along with expanding urban settlements, further degrade the visual integrity of the property. Climate change-induced droughts have exacerbated ecological stress, leading to habitat loss, increased competition for resources, and heightened vulnerability to wildfires. The site's biodiversity, including globally threatened species like the Taita Falcon, is also at risk due to illegal activities such as poaching, fishing, and logging. While bird surveys and vulture monitoring are conducted, there is a lack of detailed data on species abundance and distribution, indicating gaps in monitoring and enforcement efforts. The ongoing geological processes remain relatively stable, with the erosive forces of the Zambezi River and geological activity essentially intact. This value has not been significantly altered, reflecting the resilience of the site's geological features. However, the overall state and trend of the site's OUV are increasingly threatened by climate change, human activities, and insufficient monitoring and enforcement. Key declines in water flow and biodiversity highlight the need for stronger adaptive management, sustainable tourism practices, and community engagement to address these challenges and ensure the long-term preservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls as a World Heritage Site.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
High Concern
Deteriorating
Threats to the conservation of wildlife continue to increase, including disturbance from tourism activities (especially on the river above and below the Falls), tourism and urban development around the site, river water quality, and invasive species. The site's biodiversity, including globally threatened species like the Taita Falcon, is also at risk due to illegal activities such as poaching, fishing, and logging. While bird surveys and vulture monitoring are conducted, there is a lack of detailed data on species abundance and distribution, indicating gaps in monitoring and enforcement efforts. The proposed Batoka Gorge Hydroelectric Scheme poses a significant threat to the characteristic fauna and flora of the gorges below the Falls. There are concerns over the impact of tourism activities, with a lack of research, monitoring, and reporting on key conservation species. Constriction and closure of wildlife corridors for megafauna such as elephants and buffalo result in increased human-wildlife conflict on both sides of the river. There are many proposed developments that degrade opportunities for wildlife movement and security further.
Additional information
Sacred natural sites or landscapes
The Mosi-Oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls is considered a place to spiritual encounter and access the supernatural. The waterfall is a sacred place, the abode of the river god known as leza and a holy place used for ancestral worship (Zulu 2008:47).
There seems to little use of some of the sites for ritual or religious purposes
Indigenous communities have a close cultural and spiritual tie with the Mosi-oa-Tunya. At different times of the year, local people perform rituals at three shrines for respective purposes in the quest for abundant rainfall, cleansing, good harvest, purity, and fertility (McGregor 2003:719, Zulu 2008:59). The World Heritage site has received visitors from different parts of the World to uphold their respective beliefs and practices.
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
AWHF (2015). World Heritage Sites and Sustainable Tourism. Situational Analysis: Victoria Falls World Heritage Site, Report 2. African World Heritage Fund. [online] <https://awhf.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Tourism-Report-…;. Accessed 22 September 2020.
|
| 2 |
BirdLife International (2020). Important Bird Areas factsheet: Mosi-Oa-Tunya National Park and Batoka Gorge. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 21/09/202.
|
| 3 |
Chanda, K. C. (2016). Conservation based on indigenous knowledge: Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls. World Heritage, (82), 18–23. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246934
|
| 4 |
Chapters. (2023). Decolonizing the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Site. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-43691-9…
|
| 5 |
Chenje, M., & Johnson, P. (2007). Invasive alien species: Zambia's experiences and views. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/submissions/ias/ias-zw-2007-en.pdf
|
| 6 |
City Population (2022). City population Livingstone, Zambia. Original source is the Central Statistical Office Zambia. Available at: https://citypopulation.de/en/zambia/admin/southern/0906__li…
|
| 7 |
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2014). Joint Integrated Management Plan for the Victoria Falls/Mosi-oa-Tunya Transboundary World Heritage Site. Retrieved from https://chm.cbd.int/api/v2013/documents/A646FE23-2BB1-2597F…
|
| 8 |
IUCN Consultation. (2020). IUCN Confidential consultation, Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
|
| 9 |
Jenkins AR, van Zyl AJ, Magunje I, Matsvimbo F, Rodrigues L, Robinson L, Sebele L, Tiran D, and Smit-Robinson H. (2019). Status of the Taita Falcon (Falco fasciinucha) and Other Cliff-Nesting Raptors in Batoka Gorge, Zimbabwe. Journal of Raptor Research 53(1), 46-55. <https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-18-36>. Accessed 22 September 2020.
|
| 10 |
Katz, B. (2017, April 20). Almost Half of Natural World Heritage Sites Are Threatened by Criminal Activity. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/almost-half-natur…
|
| 11 |
Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area. (2023). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kavango%E2%80%93Zambezi_Trans…
|
| 12 |
Matiashe, F.S. (2022). Zimbabwe – Zambia: Is Victoria Falls under threat from development projects? The africa report. Published online 26 September 2022. Available at: https://www.theafricareport.com/244160/zimbabwe-zambia-vict…
|
| 13 |
Mosi Oa Tunya. (2023). About us. Retrieved from https://mosioatunya.co.zw/about-us/
|
| 14 |
Nyaungwa, M. (2024). Victoria Falls anticipates a record number of visitors in 2024. EcoTourism Expert. Published online 22 February 2024. Available at: https://eco-tourism.expert/en/news/victoria-falls-anticipat…
|
| 15 |
Nyeve, R. (2024). Victoria Falls tourist numbers surge 30pct despite El Nino challenges. The Sunday News. Published online 3 November 2024. Available at: https://www.sundaynews.co.zw/victoria-falls-tourist-numbers…
|
| 16 |
Panorama. (2023). Critical stakeholders engagement: fostering community stewardship for safeguarding natural and cultural heritage. Retrieved from https://panorama.solutions/en/solution/critical-stakeholder…
|
| 17 |
Power-Technology. Batoka Gorge Hydropower Station. https://www.power-technology.com/projects/batoka-gorge-hydr…
|
| 18 |
Ramsar. (2013). Victoria Falls National Park - Ramsar Site Information Sheet. Retrieved from https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/2108?language=en
|
| 19 |
States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe (2012). Report of the States Parties to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. [online], pp.1-24. Available at:
<https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/> [Accessed 12 February 2025] |
| 20 |
States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe (2014). Report of the States Parties to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 21 |
States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe (2016). Report of the States Parties to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 22 |
States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe (2016). Report of the States Parties to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 23 |
States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe (2018). Report of the States Parties to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 24 |
States Parties of Zambia/Zimbabwe. (2024). Report of the States Parties to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 March 2025].
|
| 25 |
The Guardian. (2019, December 7). Victoria Falls dries to a trickle after worst drought in a century. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/dec/07/victoria-fall…
|
| 26 |
UNEP-WCMC (2012). Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls, Zambia and Zimbabwe. UNEP-WCMC World Heritage Information Sheets. [online] Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC. Available at: https://yichuans.github.io/datasheet/output/site/mosi-oa-tu… [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 27 |
UNESCO (2007) Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/967 [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 28 |
UNESCO (2008). Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/808 [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 29 |
UNESCO (2010). Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/481 [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 30 |
UNESCO (2012). Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/137 [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 31 |
UNESCO (2014). Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/2899 [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 32 |
UNESCO (2017). Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3562 [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 33 |
UNESCO (2017). Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 34 |
UNESCO (2019). Report on the State of Conservation of Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 35 |
UNESCO (2024). Decision 6 COM 7B.60 Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (Zambia, Zimbabwe). Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/
|
| 36 |
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2022, March 3). African Natural World Heritage site managers assess climate vulnerabilities. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/2505
|
| 37 |
UNESCO and IUCN (2006). Reactive Monitoring mission report Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (Zambia, Zimbabwe). [online] Paris, France and Gland, Switzerland: UNESCO World Heritage Centre and IUCN. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 38 |
UNESCO and IUCN (2022). World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (Zambia / Zimbabwe). Available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/
|
| 39 |
Victoria Falls City Council. 2024. Draft Master Plan Report of Study.
|
| 40 |
Victoria Falls City Council. 2024. Draft Master Plan Written Statement.
|
| 41 |
World Heritage Committee (2012). Decision 36 COM 8E Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (Zambia, Zimbabwe) Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value. In Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 36th Session (Saint-Pétersbourg, 2012). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: <https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/137> [Accessed 8 April 2025].
|
| 42 |
World Heritage Committee (2012). Decision 36 COM 8E Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (Zambia, Zimbabwe) Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value. In: Report of decisions of the 36th session of the World Heritage Committee. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 43 |
World Heritage Committee (2017). Decision 41 COM 7B.22 Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (Zambia, Zimbabwe). In: Report of decisions of the 41st session of the World Heritage Committee. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 44 |
World Heritage Committee (2019). Decision 43 COM 7B.34 Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (Zambia, Zimbabwe). In: Report of decisions of the 36th session of the World Heritage Committee. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 45 |
ZPWMA. 2024. Zambezi/Victoria Falls National Parks General Management Plan
|
| 46 |
Zambezi River Authority. (2021). Hydrological Monitoring Report.
|
| 47 |
Zulu, J. (2023). Management and conservation of the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage property. In Managing Transnational UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Africa (pp. 37–45). Springer.
|
| 48 |
Zulu, J. (2024). Decolonizing the Mosi-Oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Site: Engaging the unspoken truths. In: Global Iconoclasm: Contesting “Official” Mnemonic Landscapes, pp.63-75.
|
| 49 |
Zulu, John. (2023). Management and conservation of the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage property. 10.1007/978-3-030-80910-2_4.
|
| 50 |
Zulu. J. (2008). Challenges of conserving the invisible dimension of Cultural heritage: Case study of the Toka Leya people of Chief Mukuni of the Victoria Falls. University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfortein, Johannesburg. Unpublished
|