Socotra Archipelago
Country
Yemen
Inscribed in
2008
Criterion
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "significant concern" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
Socotra Archipelago, in the northwest Indian Ocean near the Gulf of Aden, is 250 km long and comprises four islands and two rocky islets which appear as a prolongation of the Horn of Africa. The site is of universal importance because of its biodiversity with rich and distinct flora and fauna: 37% of Socotra’s 825 plant species, 90% of its reptile species and 95% of its land snail species do not occur anywhere else in the world. The site also supports globally significant populations of land and sea birds (192 bird species, 44 of which breed on the islands while 85 are regular migrants), including a number of threatened species. The marine life of Socotra is also very diverse, with 253 species of reef-building corals, 730 species of coastal fish and 300 species of crab, lobster and shrimp. © UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
11 أكتوبر 2025
Significant concern
Current state and trend of VALUES
High Concern
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
Complex assemblage of unique ecosystems
Criterion
(x)
Eight unique main types of vegetation/ecosystems with rich endemic biota. Part of the CI global biodiversity hotspot “Horn of Africa” (CI, 2013) and of the WWF Global 200 priority eco-region “Socotra Island xeric shrubland” (WWF, 2013). Various other designations are outlined in Van Damme and Banfield (2011). This isolated and until recently well-preserved island lying between three biogeographic regions, Afrotropical, Oriental and Palearctic, is a living museum which has preserved several intact and unique terrestrial ecosystems and their species with a traditional culture living in balance with them (UNEP-WCMC, 2011).
Endemic flora and vegetation
Criterion
(x)
At least 310 endemic plant species (+35%), 15 endemic genera, with more species continuing to be described, contribute to the Archipelago's status as a Global Centre of Plant Diversity (WWF; IUCN, 1994; Repka and Lvoncik, 2017; Thulin, 2020; IUCN Consultation, 2020). Of particular significance is the Dragon's Blood Tree Forest and Woodland, which is globally unique (IUCN Consultation, 2020; Saraf, 2021). Other endemic Socotra plants include the endangered Desert Rose (Adenium obesum subsp. socotranum) the extremely rare Cucumber tree from Cucurbitacae family (Dendrosicyos socotranum), giant succulent tree (Dorstenia gigas), rare Socotran pomegranate Lythraceae from Loosestrife family (Punica protopunica), Socotran aloe (Aloe perryi), Socotran Frankincense Tree (Boswellia socotrana) (Saraf, 2021) and endemic Commiphora species (La Montagna, 2024).
Endemic reptiles with their habitats
Criterion
(x)
Rich overall herpetofauna, with 30 known terrestrial reptile species, of which 28 (93%) are endemic to the archipelago (World Heritage Committee, 2008; IUCN Consultation, 2020), including the Socotran chameleon and several types of skinks (Saraf, 2021).
Endemic and endangered birds with their habitats
Criterion
(x)
The site harbours 11 endemic bird species (Gill, Donsker & Rasmussen, 2020), 2 of which are globally threatened (BirdLife International, 2020) in addition to another two non-endemic globally threatened species. The archipelago also represents an important breeding site for birds, with at least 41 species breeding on the islands, out of a total of 182 species recorded (BirdLife International, 2013a). The archipelago is also an Endemic Bird Area (BirdLife International, 2013a) with 21 Important Bird Areas (Porter & Suleiman, 2016).
Endemic invertebrates with their habitats
Criterion
(x)
High invertebrate endemism in land snails with 96 species (95%), isopods (73%) and arachnids (ca. 60%) and butterflies (190 species with high endemism (Neubert, 2006; World Heritage Committee, 2008; Saraf, 2021).
Coastal/marine biodiversity and habitats
Criterion
(x)
High marine diversity and some regional endemism. In total, between 830 and 890 species of fish are estimated to occur in the coastal waters of the Socotra Archipelago (Zajonz et al., 2019), along with a reported 253 species of coral, two nesting species of sea turtle, 300 species of crab, lobster, shrimp, and many whale and dolphin species in the vicinity (World Heritage Committee, 2008). Nine species of seabird breed in the archipelago, eight of which are considered to have globally important breeding populations (Porter & Suleiman 2014).
Rich culture and history of sustainable use of the land and sea
Rich cultural traditions and lifestyles, including the ancient unwritten Socotri language, and a wealth of poetry and folklore, passed down through generations. Semi-nomadic pastoralists have a strong ethic of environmental stewardship, carefully managing rangeland and fodder trees to avoid overuse; and tribal regulations regarding sustainable harvesting from the wild are well respected (Cheung & DeVantier, 2006).
To a lesser extent, the same cultural practices apply to the use of sea resources including community managed coastal reserves and tribal fishing regulations.
Among several others addressing the islands' sustainability, a specialized community-based organization (CBO) was established in 2013 to protect and promote the Socotri culture, language, and indigenous knowledge, and the Socotri governorate intends to adopt regulations to protect tangible and intangible heritage (State Party of Yemen, 2016).
To a lesser extent, the same cultural practices apply to the use of sea resources including community managed coastal reserves and tribal fishing regulations.
Among several others addressing the islands' sustainability, a specialized community-based organization (CBO) was established in 2013 to protect and promote the Socotri culture, language, and indigenous knowledge, and the Socotri governorate intends to adopt regulations to protect tangible and intangible heritage (State Party of Yemen, 2016).
Assessment information
Having been relatively well-protected by its isolation until the end of the 20th century, Socotra is now undergoing rapid development, resulting in high threats from increased natural resource use and infrastructure development, as well as growing threats related to climate change, alien and invasive species and habitat degradation. Since 2018, the World Heritage Committee has expressed its concern about the multiple reported threats to the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property resulting from uncontrolled developments, unsustainable use of natural resources, and the absence of adequate biosecurity measures to avoid the introduction of invasive alien species (IAS), and considered that all these factors represent a danger to the OUV. A Reactive Monitoring mission to assess the threats to the site and support the State Party in identifying priorities for rehabilitation and management activities , which has been requested by the World Heritage Committee since 2016 and was limited by security and logistical constraints, is being undertaken in May 2025 and will provide further details of current threats. Overall, high concerns over the threats to the property remain.
Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees
(Wood harvesting for cooking and construction.)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
The recent population increase on the island due to immigration and improved standards of life have concurrently increased demand for building material. Outside the site, this results in areas of Croton-Jatropha shrubland being cleared for building and used for firewood (sometimes, but rarely, for charcoal production for export). Whilst inside the site, wood harvesting is carried out for use as mainly fuel, rarely timber (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Socotra has become increasingly isolated and import prices increased due to political conflict. As a result, while recently fuel supplies increased, the prices however also substantially surged, leading to a strong local increase in wood collection (UNESCO 2016; Safar, 2021) since the demand for fire wood has been steadily rising due to surging immigration, tourism pressures and related activities (e.g. camp fires). The State Party states that only fallen wood is collected, and cutting down or damaging trees is not carried out (UNESCO 2015), however anecdotal evidence suggests that live wood is collected as well (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
An assessment of impact of wood harvesting suggests it could adversely affect several endemic bird species (Porter & Suleiman 2013; 2016; IUCN Red List assessments of Socotra endemics); timber harvesting is a possible threat in one IBA (Porter & Suleiman 2016). The dragon’s blood tree Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. is already considered an umbrella species on Socotra Island, therefore the decrease in these species numbers will be an inevitable result of the Dragon Blood trees decline (Tamar, K. et al., 2019). Other vertebrates such as the endemic reptiles can be affected by such loss of vegetation, as several species are strongly associated with bushes and trees (Fasola et al. 2020; Safar, 2021). Land use changes outside the site (Hadiboh Area), including clearing of shrubland, has affected also aquatic invertebrates (Van Damme et al. 2020). The extent of wood harvesting in general however, and which plant and animal species are most affected, is not studied, but this is a primarily cultural shift linked to the breakdown of traditional land use practices, and the increased pressure on local resources linked to the economical situation of the country (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
In 2025, the government reports that the impact of energy shortages on wood consumption in Socotra, and wood consumption in general, is partly a cultural issue – Socotra used to have strong traditional rules against overconsumption of timber products for fuel. However cultural shifts as well as the shortage (during monsoons) of cooking gas and vastly increased tourism pressures (outside of the monsoon season), have increased the use of wood for cooking and camp fires. Implementation of the Zoning Plan, in particular in sensitive areas, should help to reduce these impacts, however more important here are awareness activities to highlight the need to protect wood as a resource. The UNEP-GEF-EPA project has several activities planned in this regard, however yet to be implemented in full (such as the suggestion of wood plots) (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
An assessment of impact of wood harvesting suggests it could adversely affect several endemic bird species (Porter & Suleiman 2013; 2016; IUCN Red List assessments of Socotra endemics); timber harvesting is a possible threat in one IBA (Porter & Suleiman 2016). The dragon’s blood tree Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. is already considered an umbrella species on Socotra Island, therefore the decrease in these species numbers will be an inevitable result of the Dragon Blood trees decline (Tamar, K. et al., 2019). Other vertebrates such as the endemic reptiles can be affected by such loss of vegetation, as several species are strongly associated with bushes and trees (Fasola et al. 2020; Safar, 2021). Land use changes outside the site (Hadiboh Area), including clearing of shrubland, has affected also aquatic invertebrates (Van Damme et al. 2020). The extent of wood harvesting in general however, and which plant and animal species are most affected, is not studied, but this is a primarily cultural shift linked to the breakdown of traditional land use practices, and the increased pressure on local resources linked to the economical situation of the country (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
In 2025, the government reports that the impact of energy shortages on wood consumption in Socotra, and wood consumption in general, is partly a cultural issue – Socotra used to have strong traditional rules against overconsumption of timber products for fuel. However cultural shifts as well as the shortage (during monsoons) of cooking gas and vastly increased tourism pressures (outside of the monsoon season), have increased the use of wood for cooking and camp fires. Implementation of the Zoning Plan, in particular in sensitive areas, should help to reduce these impacts, however more important here are awareness activities to highlight the need to protect wood as a resource. The UNEP-GEF-EPA project has several activities planned in this regard, however yet to be implemented in full (such as the suggestion of wood plots) (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Conflict, Civil Unrest & Security Activities
(Increased vulnerability, sociopolitical transformations, loss of governance systems of land and sea, dismantled land tenure system.)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
The property is increasingly vulnerable due to the security situation in Yemen resulting from political instability and lack of financial resources. The archipelago's distance from mainland Yemen has allowed it to largely avoid armed conflict, however political upheaval and social transformation have also reached the Archipelago and are negatively impacting the conservation and management of the WH site, and the interaction of these processes affects local livelihoods and conservation/development donor involvement (Van Damme, 2011; Peutz, 2018; State Party of Yemen, 2016-2025; UNESCO, 2018-2024). More generally, there is a likelihood of recurring fuel shortages (while prices have the tendency to increase steadily). Sociopolitical conflicts are ongoing with changes of ownership related to land and sea tenure, in addition to a lack of implementation of local laws and controls (e.g. accelerated selling of land to foreign investors and related uncontrolled development, as well as invasive species) which have a direct negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of Socotra. However, several conservation projects are able to continue through international development funding; at present all biodiversity conservation projects on Socotra are in partnership with the locally in power Southern Transitional Council which is backed by the UAE, and facilitate almost exclusively internationally funded nature and culture conservation projects (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution
(Insecticide use and solid waste)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
The use of pesticides has increased in recent years in the site including Temephos in anti-malaria campaigns since 2000, the recent treatment of coastal lagoons with insecticides from small aircrafts in April 2019 (Van Damme et al. 2020), against the will of the local government, and large scale spraying of date plantations becoming a norm in practice (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Localised effects on invertebrate fauna have been observed (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011), and although no effects beyond localised areas inside the site have been observed to date (Van Damme et al. 2020) and no data is yet available on circumstances inside greenhouses and built-up areas, effects are likely to have increased. These issues could affect endemic predators that depend on invertebrates (endemic bats; Benda et al., 2018). In particular with the advent of new alien species in date palm plantations (Witt et al. 2020) against which insecticides are used, effects on local aquatic and terrestrial fauna can be predicted, as previously suggested (Van Damme and Banfield 2011). In addition, the amount of solid waste in Socotra, in particular plastic waste, has visibly increased in coastal areas and mainly in the development areas; how this may affect the biodiversity of the site is unclear, however this has stimulated a culture of waste appearing all over; in particular in coastal lagoons, which harbour a rich biodiversity, this trend is very visible (see aforementioned references for photographs) (IUCN Consultation, 2020; Saraf, 2021).
Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Illegal hunting of sea turtles, collection of plants, reptiles, invertebrates, sea cucumber, squid, octopus, lobsters and shark fins for trade)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Illegal hunting of sea turtles, collection of lobsters and shark fins have been reported as well as markets such as squid, sea cucumber and octopus export. The local authorities seem unable to monitor and implement strict rules in regards to illegal hunting and overfishing. The control over sea- and airports is fluctuating, and no data of the exact species and amounts are yet available that leave Socotra for export. Some of these activities are driven by international markets (Cheung and DeVantier 2006; Van Damme & Banfield, 2011), however some other activities may be localised and driven by local poverty or local disagreements. E.g. during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, the access to import of essential goods was limited, which led to an increased consumption of local resources (Saraf, 2021). Illegal international trade is exacerbated by an increase in security problems in the Indian Ocean and limited law enforcement capacities of Socotra authorities to respond (Abulhawa et al, 2013). In addition, although this data exists, the lack of transparent marine data sharing by former partners of the State Party complicates the planning of conservation measures (e.g. understanding the size of the populations in nature of the hunted species, the markets, etc.). Illegal hunting of sea turtles increased around the breeding season in 2020 and continue to be seen sold sporadically in local fish markets, however the illegal activities are said to be met by a rapid response of the EPA Chairpersons (both in Yemen and Socotra branch) to stop the deliberate hunting and sales. The latter indicates both the concern and the will of EPA to continue to protect the site under the most difficult conditions (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The 2025 State Party report highlights that targeted protection and monitoring programs were established for Caretta caretta sea turtle nesting seasons at Abelhan Nature Sanctuary, which supports a globally threatened species listed under the CITES Convention. The programmes supported by the GEF-UNEP (#5347) project, RSCN, and EPA for the past four years have been critical in safeguarding the species during their annual nesting season from April to September. The project has also facilitated training for staff members from the Socotra Turtle Protection Association, representatives of the local community, and other key stakeholders, ensuring the program is sustainably managed and effectively implemented (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Roads, Trails & Railroads
(Habitat destruction and fragmentation through road construction)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
There has been more than 900 km of roads constructed on Socotra Island since 2001 (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011). A decree to sustainably manage road construction in 2008 and political crisis since 2011 did temporarily reduced this pressure, but in recent years have accelerated again, and some new roads have been constructed recently (e.g. the creation of a multi-lane road connecting the airport to the main city of Hadibou that has recently started to be carved into the cliff along the shore where endemic species are spotted and which heightens the risk of further cliff erosion, as well as from Daneghan to Adho di Melho road which runs through a highly sensitive area with many endemics (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
In the past, these effects were strongly emphasized (Cheung and DeVantier, 2006), in some areas such as Eriosh, affecting both biodiversity and culture (Van Damme, 2018), and road networks increase access in most areas of the island (see maps on distance-cost in Riccardi et al. 2020). Indirect effects include habitat and hydrological fragmentation, potentially wildlife mortality, weaking of fragmented endemic vegetation population, solid waste and invasive species dispersal, disturbance, enhanced access for natural resource use and the facilitated transport of grazers to new areas increasing grazing pressure and access to wood for fuel (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011; Maděra et al., 2024). No maintenance program is in place for the large road network, which increases post construction impacts causing soil erosion, habitat destruction and fragmentation, downstream pollution and contributes to the perceived need for construction of new roads (Abulhawa el al 2013). Review of Porter & Suleiman (2016) suggests that fragmentation through road building and associated development could impact on several (8) IBAs. A detailed overview of road networks and their potential ranges of impact (heatmaps) are presented in Riccardi et al. (2020), however this latter study has shown that currently the vicinity to roads on tree vegetation in Socotra is not significant in comparison to governing climate and soil characteristics.
The State Party reports that due to insufficient management capacity related to the situation in the mainland, there have been local initiatives by private and foreign investors to expand the road network to some sensitive areas in breach of the OUV, for example, Haggeher mountains. Whilst the authorities note that road development should be assessed for impact on biodiversity, and where possible, remediation for negative environmental impacts sought, capacity remains limited (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
In the past, these effects were strongly emphasized (Cheung and DeVantier, 2006), in some areas such as Eriosh, affecting both biodiversity and culture (Van Damme, 2018), and road networks increase access in most areas of the island (see maps on distance-cost in Riccardi et al. 2020). Indirect effects include habitat and hydrological fragmentation, potentially wildlife mortality, weaking of fragmented endemic vegetation population, solid waste and invasive species dispersal, disturbance, enhanced access for natural resource use and the facilitated transport of grazers to new areas increasing grazing pressure and access to wood for fuel (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011; Maděra et al., 2024). No maintenance program is in place for the large road network, which increases post construction impacts causing soil erosion, habitat destruction and fragmentation, downstream pollution and contributes to the perceived need for construction of new roads (Abulhawa el al 2013). Review of Porter & Suleiman (2016) suggests that fragmentation through road building and associated development could impact on several (8) IBAs. A detailed overview of road networks and their potential ranges of impact (heatmaps) are presented in Riccardi et al. (2020), however this latter study has shown that currently the vicinity to roads on tree vegetation in Socotra is not significant in comparison to governing climate and soil characteristics.
The State Party reports that due to insufficient management capacity related to the situation in the mainland, there have been local initiatives by private and foreign investors to expand the road network to some sensitive areas in breach of the OUV, for example, Haggeher mountains. Whilst the authorities note that road development should be assessed for impact on biodiversity, and where possible, remediation for negative environmental impacts sought, capacity remains limited (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Threats of invasive mammals to native and endemic fauna)
Other invasive species names
Rattus norvegicus (Norwegian Rat); Aphanius dispar (Arabian Toothcarp); Viverricula indica (Lesser Civet); Felix catus (Cat)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Beyond the effects of introduced livestock, there are several introduced mammals on Socotra which are known invasives and which may affect local and endemic faunas (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). Three of the outlying islands in the archipelago with internationally important populations of breeding seabirds have been colonised by rats. This is only/mainly relevant in Darsa, where there is no human population and rats are the dominant mammals. Rats are a known threat to nesting seabirds. There have been so far no direct studies of their impact in the Socotra archipelago, and surveys to the outer islands are very sporadic and rare. On the main island, the effects of the presence of rats, cats and civet cats on the endemic birds, reptiles and invertebrate faunas are unstudied; as these invasives have been on the island centuries, the ecosystems may have found a new equilibrium of which they are part; however roads and other changes may help spread these invasives to areas that were before fairly little exposed (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). A similar situation exists for the presence of the Arabian Toothcarp in aquatic ecosystems in Socotra, of which populations were introduced through anti-malaria campaigns (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; Van Damme et al., 2020). All of the above are vertebrate invasives that are known to have a strong effect on native faunas elsewhere in the world, therefore, although assessed as Data Deficient locally, the threat of these invasives, in accordance to data from other insular ecosystems, is high by extrapolation (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011).
Severe Weather Events
(Severe weather affecting endemic Boswellia and Dracaena species.)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
The cyclones that hit in November-December 2015 and in May 2018 had serious impacts on both infrastructure, including increased soil erosion around roads (UNESCO, 2016), as well as on trees, terrestrial biodiversity and marine environment (State Party of Yemen, 2016). A detailed study has shown that the cyclones of 2015 destroyed 38% of all B. elongata trees (already a weakened population due to overgrazing) in the largest population in Homhil Nature Sanctuary, followed by loss of an additional 29% in the next two years (Lvoncik et al. 2020). Likely as a result of such vegetation loss in higher areas of Socotra island and valley slopes, soil erosion and landslides linked to a combination of overgrazing and such extreme weather events lead to a lower vegetation productivity according to satellite data and may compound existing threats to the endemic flora and fauna of the site (Maděra et al., 2019b; IUCN Consultation, 2020; Rezende et al. 2020; Attorre and Van Damme, 2020). Loss of vegetation by storms can affect endemic reptiles (Fasola et al. 2020), birds (Porter and Suleiman, 2016) and endemic invertebrates associated with the vegetation, and even the hydrological cycle of the island in which the trees play an essential role (Kalivodova et al. 2020; Attorre and Van Damme, 2020). The dragon’s blood tree Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. is already considered an umbrella species on Socotra Island, therefore the decrease in these species numbers will be an inevitable result of the Dragon Blood trees decline (IUCN Consultation, 2020; Tamar, K. et al., 2019). In 2022, the Firmihin Protected Area, which contains the most concentrated area of Dragon Blood trees on Socotra, was newly established by Prime Ministerial decree and a management plan developed (State Party of Yemen, 2025). However, details of the degree of protection and management implications remain unclear. Severe weather events are expected to become more frequent due to climate change; climate mitigation measures as well as disaster risk management are urgently needed to reduce impacts and improve management effectiveness.
Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops
(Agriculture development)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Commercial crop production related to a significant rise in immigration and population count has consequentially increased, albeit very localised, in recent years on the island (IUCN Consultation, 2020), resulting in locally increased water demand, biocide pollution, and the unwanted import of exotic plants and pests (Witt et al. 2020; IUCN Consultation, 2020). Even though most of the current agriculture is limited to date palm farming, homegardens and two larger vegetable production sites (outside the site but on Socotra island), there are strong associations with the import of crops (Witt et al. 2020). A new large food security project for Socotra (FAO) with the aim to establish large-scale agriculture activities and plots on the island, should take the vulnerability of the biodiversity of the site (also the buffer zone) into account in any of its future planning, as even the coastal lowlands, considered less biodiversity rich, still contain globally unique ecosystems and many endemics. At present the threats from agriculture are low, but without proper development planning and communication between all stakeholders, this can become a high risk for Socotra's endemic fauna, flora, and the cultures associated with traditional agriculture (date palm, millet farming) (IUCN Consultation, 2020). In 2025, the State Party reports that a GEF-7 project on “Resilient and Sustainable Livelihoods for Rural Yemen” (ID: 10562) aims to develop sustainable and resilient livelihoods for rural Yemeni by integrating climate change adaptation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable land management into key sectors such as agriculture, livestock, and fisheries. Also that further funding is being sought under GEF-8 (State Party of Yemen, 2025). However from this report it is unclear to what extent agriculture remains a threat.
Terrestrial Animal Farming, Ranching & Herding
(Overgrazing/Fodder use)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Grazing and fodder use have been reported at unsustainable levels, with excessive grazing levels evident, and has been attributed as the primary factor in the population decline (lack of regeneration) of Dracaena and Boswellia trees (Maděra et al, 2019a; 2019b; Lvoncik et al., 2020; Hamdiah et al., 2024) and compounds other threats such as landslides, soil erosion and habitat degradation (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; UNESCO, 2016; Maděra et al., 2024). Overgrazing has been attributed, in combination with climate change (vegetation loss+rains/floods), to the loss of vegetation productivity in valley slopes and areas in the mountains (Attorre and Van Damme, 2020; Rezende et al. 2020). In particular in times of drought, the grazing has an enormous impact on regeneration of the natural vegetation, for example the Boswellia trees (Lvoncik et al., 2020; Hamdiah et al., 2024).
There is insufficient cooperation with traditional pastoralists to develop a sustainable grazing regime (Abulhawa et al., 2013), which was traditionally present (Miller and Morris, 2004), therefore this is predominantly a result of a cultural and economical shift (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). Although the landscape and unique vegetation of Socotra have evolved with goats for millennia, and have traditionally been managed sustainably, a number of factors including the loss of traditional land management practices and increasing numbers of goats in response to increased demand from the islands growing population have begun to create overgrazing and overbrowsing (Scholte et al., 2008; Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). The livestock grazing activity is deeply anchored in local history and traditional practices, however, the dramatic socioeconomic transformation of the island by cash based and market based approaches already since the 1950s-1960s, have resulted in major alteration of the traditional lifestyle related to grazing (Miller and Morris, 2004; Scholte et al., 2008; Van Damme and Banfield, 2011), such that it is no longer a subsistence based activity, rather has evolved as a primarily commercial one. However also this is again shifting, as with development and new business in Socotra (more immigration), the types of economic activities have diversified (not only fish, date palm and livestock production). The overgrazing and its effects on the lack of regeneration of the vegetation and on soil erosion, can be considered as one of the main threats to the terrestrial environment of Socotra (Attorre and Van Damme, 2020).
In 2025, a study of grazing types and impacts which aims to reduce overgrazing is being carried out by UNEP, Mendel University, and the government. Also, the aforementioned GEF-7 project includes grazing management and organisation. The government states there is a need to establish a monitoring plan for grazing, and it intends to improve grazing regulation, support alternative livelihood activities and explore mechanisms to reduce grazing impacts (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
There is insufficient cooperation with traditional pastoralists to develop a sustainable grazing regime (Abulhawa et al., 2013), which was traditionally present (Miller and Morris, 2004), therefore this is predominantly a result of a cultural and economical shift (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). Although the landscape and unique vegetation of Socotra have evolved with goats for millennia, and have traditionally been managed sustainably, a number of factors including the loss of traditional land management practices and increasing numbers of goats in response to increased demand from the islands growing population have begun to create overgrazing and overbrowsing (Scholte et al., 2008; Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). The livestock grazing activity is deeply anchored in local history and traditional practices, however, the dramatic socioeconomic transformation of the island by cash based and market based approaches already since the 1950s-1960s, have resulted in major alteration of the traditional lifestyle related to grazing (Miller and Morris, 2004; Scholte et al., 2008; Van Damme and Banfield, 2011), such that it is no longer a subsistence based activity, rather has evolved as a primarily commercial one. However also this is again shifting, as with development and new business in Socotra (more immigration), the types of economic activities have diversified (not only fish, date palm and livestock production). The overgrazing and its effects on the lack of regeneration of the vegetation and on soil erosion, can be considered as one of the main threats to the terrestrial environment of Socotra (Attorre and Van Damme, 2020).
In 2025, a study of grazing types and impacts which aims to reduce overgrazing is being carried out by UNEP, Mendel University, and the government. Also, the aforementioned GEF-7 project includes grazing management and organisation. The government states there is a need to establish a monitoring plan for grazing, and it intends to improve grazing regulation, support alternative livelihood activities and explore mechanisms to reduce grazing impacts (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Changes in Physical & Chemical Regimes, Changes in Temperature Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Impacts deriving from climate change)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Recent studies show the impacts of climate change effects on the environment, leading to an accelerated loss of vegetation in certain areas (Attorre and Van Damme, 2020; Lvoncik et al., 2020; Rezende et al., 2020; Saraf, 2021; La Montagna et al., 2024). Coastal areas are sensitive to sea level rise, flooding and coastal erosion, and extreme weather events are exacerbated globally. Also coral bleaching has been established (Cheung and DeVantier, 2006), although no long term monitoring data has been comprehensively shared with the State Party to take the right conservation measures. Increasingly dry conditions are expected. A 2024 GEF/UNEP project assessment of erosion and climate change showed a 2.5°C temperature rise and a 16% increase in mean annual rainfall by 2100. Severe water erosion threatens 36% of Socotra, with extreme erosion in 8%, and high wind erosion was observed, particularly along southern and middle northern shorelines. The fragile soil, vegetation, steep slopes, and high wind speeds necessitate an urgent master land use plan to mitigate land degradation (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
In addition to a further aggravation of current threats, continued and extended development in the future are likely to lead to habitat destruction for construction and further potential unsustainable tourism infrastructure particularly in areas of high scenic and biodiversity value, potentially bringing a dramatically increased risk of invasive alien species, and increased waste production. Whilst tourism is currently relatively limited due to ongoing insecurity, an expected future increase in tourist numbers without effective tourism management remains a potential threat. The potential threat from climate change to the property’s values is now backed up by scientific models showing scenarios with and without climate change impacts. The presence and future presence of invasive species is also shown by recent discoveries, and therefore a high current and potential threat. The continuation of the political instability and weak governance systems are likely to accelerate and magnify the impacts of potential threats, although there are positive efforts through various international development projects to strengthen the capacity of the local management to deal with these threats, met with strong commitment and goodwill by the State Party as represented by EPA for the site.
Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Unsustainable tourism)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Prior to the conflict situation and COVID-19, tourist numbers had increased exponentially (more than 30-fold since 2000) but absolute numbers were still considered low (ca. 5,000 in 2009) (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011) and have increased again due to the opening of weekly chartered flights from Abu Dhabi (which attracts more international tourists as stopovers in mainland Yemen can be avoided) which is also testified in the rise in local tourism agencies (some of which are internationally funded and operated by foreign labour from outside Socotra). Since then, tourism numbers have not been well monitored and the overall lack of tourism development planning, concentration of tourists at high natural value sites (e.g. recently created tourist camp in the heart of the biodiversity sensitive Detwah lagoon, which is not only part of the World Heritage site, but also a Protected Area, Ramsar site and Important Bird Area), increase in road/infrastructure development, water and timber demand (e.g. daily camp fires for tourist campsites), accelerated breakdown of traditional land management and other cultural erosion, increased risk of invasive species (Abulhawa & Abdulhalim, 2013; Van Damme and Banfield, 2011) are perceivable risks associated with increasing tourism. Accelerating trend, strong international investor acquisition of land and economical interest, and likely secondary threats related to infrastructure development in the absence of a strong regulatory framework, warrant classification as a high threat. Once the situation on the mainland is more stable, and if no sustainable tourism management plans have been set in place on the island to control illegal activities and destruction of sensitive sites, tourism may have an even higher adverse impact. Impacts on local sites such as sensitive caves (Hoq) which contain important archeological remains and biodiversity, are evident (Cheung and DeVantier, 2006) and have been reported also more recently (e.g. inscriptions start to disappear as visitors keep touching them, and tourists adding their names on the walls).
In 2025, the government considers tourism to not have been a pressing issue in recent years, however acknowledges it to be resurfacing as a challenge, and that current systems for control and management remain limited, with the need for a comprehensive tourism carrying capacity assessment, as well as tourism that is sustainable and in collaboration with local Socotri communities (rather than operated by foreigners). The EPA intends to promote low impact ecotourism in accordance with a sustainable tourist business plan that benefits local communities without harming the OUV. The ongoing UNEP-GEF project includes an evaluation of ecotourism opportunities to assess the capacity of ecotourism, infrastructure needs, and proposed approach to sustain low impact eco-tourism. Basic infrastructure to serve tourists and promote environmentally friendly approaches has been established in four protected areas, and staff trained to enhance tourism services and utilise income (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
In 2025, the government considers tourism to not have been a pressing issue in recent years, however acknowledges it to be resurfacing as a challenge, and that current systems for control and management remain limited, with the need for a comprehensive tourism carrying capacity assessment, as well as tourism that is sustainable and in collaboration with local Socotri communities (rather than operated by foreigners). The EPA intends to promote low impact ecotourism in accordance with a sustainable tourist business plan that benefits local communities without harming the OUV. The ongoing UNEP-GEF project includes an evaluation of ecotourism opportunities to assess the capacity of ecotourism, infrastructure needs, and proposed approach to sustain low impact eco-tourism. Basic infrastructure to serve tourists and promote environmentally friendly approaches has been established in four protected areas, and staff trained to enhance tourism services and utilise income (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive species, mostly terrestrial.)
Other invasive species names
Norwegian Rat (Rattus norvegicus), Opuntia stricta, Prosopis juliflora, Felix catus, Viverricula indica, etc.
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
To date, 135 introduced or invasive species had been recorded on the Socotra archipelago, according to the Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species - Soqotra, Yemen (van Harten et al., 2025) (e.g. introduction of horses, dogs, chickens and goats by foreign investors). However some have been eradicated in the past, such as a few accidental specimens of the Indian House Crow eradicated a decade ago (Suleiman et al., 2010), or a population of the invasive cactus Opuntia and the tree Prosopis (CABI, 2018). The local capacity to deal with strategic management of invasive species in Socotra remains currently still insufficient and import of goods which brings invasive pests and other pathways may have increased, apparent by the recent discovery of the Red Palm Weevil (IUCN Consultation, 2020; Witt et al., 2020). Phytosanitary measures, quarantines and capacity, are currently not in place yet, which allow exotics to enter undetected at present (Witt et al., 2020). Native vertebrates such as birds and reptiles may be adversely affected by the invasive vertebrates (cats, rats, civet cats) as shown in other islands in the world, although no specific studies have been carried out in Socotra to determine the role of these invasives in the food chain (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). Further details of invasive species can be found in the 2024 Guide to the Naturalized, Invasive and Potentially Invasive Plants of Socotra, Yemen (Witt and Abdullah, 2023).
Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Overfishing, including loss of control over offshore external fishing activities.)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Uncontrolled overfishing by large boats and international fishing fleets is a continuous threat, and is exacerbated by an increase in security problems in the Indian Ocean and limited law enforcement capacities of Socotra authorities to respond (Abulhawa et al, 2013). Due to the fluctuating control over the sea- and airport, the monitoring and documentation of amounts of overfishing and their export are questionable. In 2025, the government states that the state of conservation of marine resources and impacts of unsustainable fishing should be urgently assessed (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Shipping Lanes
(Grounded Cargo Ships)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Two cargo ships were grounded west of Hawlaf Harbor, with potential to lead to damage to the marine environment (UNESCO SOC 2016). One of the wrecks has been removed, and the fuel of the other has also been removed (IUCN Consultation, 2017), however ships continue to become stranded, there is no management or action plan for such events, which may indeed increase in frequency along with growing number and severity of cyclones due to climate change (IUCN Consultation, 2020). An Emergency Assistance project funded under the World Heritage fund aimed to address the January 2023 oil spill from a tanker stranded at the Delisha Nature Sanctuary since November 2019, which states that the coast had been mostly cleaned by local authorities and community organizations, however traces of the impact on the coast are reported to still be seen and that the Gulf Dove tanker still contains some residual oil derivatives, and hence poses a continued potential risk to the OUV (State Party of Yemen, 2025; UNESCO, 2024).
Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees
(Charcoal Production)
Outside site
Production and export of charcoal remains a potential threat as such production could impact Socotra's endemic tree species, associated fauna, and contribute to further environmental pollution (IUCN, 2014). According to the latest information, charcoal production is no longer active (IUCN Consultation, 2017; 2020), however, the potential impact of charcoal production on Socotra's endemic flora remains a valid concern. The arrival of foreign investment in charcoal production on the island prior to 2014 has lead to concerns relating to the sustainable wood collection techniques traditionally practiced on the island (UNESCO, 2015). In 2025, the State Party reports the need to map and document current wood consumption and to assess sensitive areas and ecosystems, as well as to adequately secure cooking gas (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge systems that result in negative impact, Identity/social cohesion/ changes in local population and community that result in negative impact
(Increased loss of connection between the local communities and their environment)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Since half a century, the link between human and the environment on Socotra is waning, although a strong cultural and traditional resource management basis is present and well known (Miller and Morris, 2004; Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; Sloan & Alawi, 2023). This process, through the potential future disappearance of the local Socotri language (on the list of endangered languages as recognised by UNESCO), associated description of the environment (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011) and local practices, as well as the surged selling of land to international investors, is accelerating as younger generations disconnect from the environment through ongoing cultural shifts (further accelerated through the increase in tourism and the trend to leave mountainous villages to engage in monetized tourism activities). Efforts to protect the link between humans and their environment on Socotra, stimulating the local language, are key to any conservation activity (Saraf, 2021). Local management and local sustainable resource use are priorities in several ongoing projects, and the local community involvement should be strongly adhered. Recent events such as hunting of turtles, or export of the endemic buzzards, increased overgrazing, and wood collection, all indicate a cultural shift and erosion of the environmental link (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Dams & Water Management/Use
(Water Management/Use)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Water is a valuable resource on Socotra, of which the management is in need of evaluation due to changes in the environment (climate change expressed in droughts and torrential rains, changing waterways and causing natural dams in some areas). The surge in the island population due to immigration and tourism consequently leads to the need of more drinking water and uncontrolled drilling (e.g. extraction of water from certain areas lead to saltwater intrusion, such as in the case of the second largest town Qalensiyah, where the population is now depending on a desalination facility), and alterations of aquatic environments. Some links to local biodiversity in inland and coastal waters are suggested in Van Damme and Banfield (2011) and Van Damme et al. (2020). Also, the loss of Dragon's Blood Trees is linked to the hydrological cycle of the island, as these trees capture a large amount of water (Kalivodova et al., 2020). The actual threat of water extraction has not been studied in detail so far, as this would require a specific study.
Mining & Quarrying
(Localised quarrying, digging and stone collection)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
As the population increases in Socotra and more houses are built, local resources are used for building, such as stones and sand. Sand quarries are present outside the site in Hawlaf (however, the dune is a geologically important phenomenon), and in localised areas such as near Ayhaft. Throughout the site however, there is increased digging and collection of stones for building - this seems to be now increasingly common, and would affect ground-rooting plants that germinate between stones to escape grazing, invertebrates, and their predators (e.g., birds). Reptiles are also strongly linked to such substrates (Fasola et al., 2020). At present, this threat seems limited, but should be monitored closely over following years - quarrying and mining in the national park is supposedly not allowed according to the SCZP (UNDP-GEF, 2000) ), however diggings are reported in Diksam and Momi to create new roads, while other large areas are now privatised after the acquisition of lands by foreign investors (e.g. Qadama – turtle protected area, and two areas in Diksam and Shibhan plateau which contain approx. 280 Dragons Blood trees).
Garbage & Solid Waste
(Pollution/waste)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
There was a 25% increase in macro-waste production estimated until 2015 (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011), which is thought to have continued due to the increase in immigration and tourism activities and now effects a larger proportion of the site, however no studies have been carried out to assess the size and effect (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The solid waste problem is mainly concentrated in the general use zone including the development nodes and corridor between Hadibu (the capital) and Qalansyia, the second largest town, yet spreads strongly along asphalted roads throughout the island. This includes the airport, the sea port and the transportation corridor linking them. Plastic waste is an increasing issue due to the increased import of plastic products, and lack of national funds for effective waste management, compounded by oceanic plastic transported to the island from outside (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Some effects are visible in the aquatic habitats, such as the coastal lagoons, which merit a higher protection status (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; Van Damme et al. 2020). In 2025, the government recognises that waste management remains a problem in Socotra, in particular in the buffer zone. Plastic waste is accumulating along the coast, with a concerted effort needed by donors and other countries (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals, Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Export of native species)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Export of native species is sometimes checked in the airport by locals, however capacity is insufficient and due to the changing political situation, responsibilities shift between groups in control of the port and airport (IUCN Consultation, 2020; Saraf, 2021). Export of species was mentioned in Van Damme and Banfield (2011) and recent reports also indicate export of endemic bird species for falconry (Socotra Buzzard) as suggested before (Porter and Kirwan, 2010). This also includes the export of dead coral from the north-west coastal areas for commercial use in the Gulf Countries as well as for local use in building materials.
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals
(Trapping and illegal sale of birds)
Other targeted species names
Buteo socotraensis
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
The endemic, globally threatened (Vulnerable status) Socotra Buzzard population might be affected by an increase in the taking of young birds from nests and trapping of adults for sale and export with the aim to be used (mistakenly) in Falconry in abroad (in the region); this was reported in literature for the Socotra Buzzard in the past (Porter and Kirwan 2010) and recently (2019) observed again, where animals for export were successfully confiscated by EPA Socotra at the airport. The observations were included in a new assessment of the status of Red Listed species for BirdLife International in 2020 (AS Suleiman, RF Porter & K Van Damme in litt, 2020). Additionally, there could potentially be a threat with relation to the catching of birds for food in the outer islands (this practice is not known from Socotra Island in the past decades). It is known that the globally threatened (Vulnerable status) Abd al Kuri Sparrow could be captured for food and this could impact on its population (AS Suleiman & RF Porter in litt, 2020), but no evidence (anecdotal or not) that this has happened in recent years (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Insufficient mainstreaming of sustainable development among all stakeholders (e.g. local people and traditional users, line ministries, tourism industry) has been a key obstacle to effective conservation management (Abulhawa and Abdulhalim, 2013). Recent research has emphasized the key role that user-focused efforts and the implementation of sustainable land practices can play in conservation (Maděra et al., 2024; Rezende et al., 2022; Sloan & Alawi, 2023). A relatively recent project (UNDP) aimed to improve functioning of CBOs and local government was adopting a policy to include CBO representatives in decision making. There were training programs from 2013-2016 implemented by EPA, local government, UNDP, and GIZ (State Party of Yemen, 2016) and more recently by the UNEP-GEF project on the Island (State Party of Yemen, 2025). There are several civil society organizations which are dedicated to promote sustainable development, protect Socotra’s natural and cultural heritage, and strengthen the political and social representation of the local people on the national and international levels (Abulhawa et al, 2013). Indigenous people rights and access to benefits should be actively integrated in existing projects. Intense involvement of national and international scientists in demarcation and management planning, should include local communities. The latest State Party report highlights that several recent management processes have included stakeholder consultations, such as the revision and update of the SCZP; the four new management plans for Homhil, Firmihin, Rosh, DiHamri; and the national strategy for IAS control (State Party of Yemen, 2025). However, the the need for empowering local communities and local institutions and entities to enable them to manage the site and implement conservation projects still remains. Efforts have been made by several organisations where local communities initiate, implement and manage conservation projects themselves, without top-down control, for example in the successful Mangrove Replantation Project of the Socotri Al Tamek Association funded by Friends of Soqotra (FoS) and ARC-WH (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Large international donor projects may run into issues with local people relationships due to land ownership during conservation activities, or by overspending for small activities - recent turtle hunting by local communities who were discontent with management of a larger project, a dispute that had to be settled by EPA, is an example of the need for more sustainable solutions. Specific efforts are therefore done by local authorities and EPA to remediate such issues, however international donors should take the local communities as a priority at all times to avoid conservation activities being suboptimal. Examples of best practice exist, for example in the Ghubbah Mangrove site (FoS & ARC-WH), and the Keybani Dragon's Blood Nursery in Shibehon, where local associations take the lead, and request technical support when needed (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Legal framework
The Socotra Conservation Zoning Plan (SCZP), established by Presidential Decree n° 275 in 2000, provides the major legal framework defining the types of protected areas and allowable activities within the property. It includes a spatial definition of coastal, marine and terrestrial protected areas (national park + nature sanctuaries) and defines four conservation management categories, and including several general articles on protection of wildlife. In 2022, by Prime Minister Decree (n°1) of 2022, Roqeb di Firmihin was added as a protected area (level II National Park, equal to Nature Sanctuary) to protect the Dragon’s Blood Tree (Dracaena cinnabari) forest ecosystem as well as the surrounding wadis (Wadi Derhor and Wadi Derho). Besides the SCZP, there is also the key Environment Protection Law (n° 26) of 1995, defining the roles of EPA (art. 5 and 30-34), protection of water, soil and the establishment of protected areas (art. 6-14), the need for environmental impact assessments for any development (35-43), control of the use of pesticides (art. 15-21; 75-81), protection of threatened wildlife (and forbidding poaching) and reduction of pollution (art. 22-29; 44-55; 75-86). In addition to these two main overarching laws, of which one specific to Socotra, there are several other national laws relevant to biodiversity conservation, protected areas, invasive species, as well as on sustainable land management, land-use planning (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
The land is traditionally government property, but outside of Hadibou and Qalansiyah its resources are owned by tribal groups that manage them according to long proved customs (UNEP-WCMC, 2011), however illegal land sale within as well as outside of the main cities now is quite common (IUCN Consultation, 2020)especially along the shorelines which are recently bought by foreign investors – which include highly sensitive biodiversity areas such as a turtle protected area as well as other locations within the World Heritage property (e.g. Diksam) containing high numbers of endemic species, such as the Dragons Blood trees. The legal status of Socotra Administration itself (no archipelago wide conservation authority) is a major obstacle to conservation enforcement (Abulhawa & Abdulhalim, 2013; Van Damme & Banfield, 2011). Updating and streamlining the legal framework is part of ongoing projects (UNEP-GEF) and its reinforcement would be crucial.
In its 2022 state of conservation report to the World Heritage Committee, the government stated that a new Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) system (under environmental law 26/1995) was approved in 2021, requiring EIAs for all development projects on Socotra, however it seems to not often be implemented. This would be a significant positive step towards ensuring that inappropriate developments do not negatively impact on the OUV (UNESCO, 2023).
The land is traditionally government property, but outside of Hadibou and Qalansiyah its resources are owned by tribal groups that manage them according to long proved customs (UNEP-WCMC, 2011), however illegal land sale within as well as outside of the main cities now is quite common (IUCN Consultation, 2020)especially along the shorelines which are recently bought by foreign investors – which include highly sensitive biodiversity areas such as a turtle protected area as well as other locations within the World Heritage property (e.g. Diksam) containing high numbers of endemic species, such as the Dragons Blood trees. The legal status of Socotra Administration itself (no archipelago wide conservation authority) is a major obstacle to conservation enforcement (Abulhawa & Abdulhalim, 2013; Van Damme & Banfield, 2011). Updating and streamlining the legal framework is part of ongoing projects (UNEP-GEF) and its reinforcement would be crucial.
In its 2022 state of conservation report to the World Heritage Committee, the government stated that a new Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) system (under environmental law 26/1995) was approved in 2021, requiring EIAs for all development projects on Socotra, however it seems to not often be implemented. This would be a significant positive step towards ensuring that inappropriate developments do not negatively impact on the OUV (UNESCO, 2023).
Governance arrangements
Socotra was established as an independent governorate in 2013. The Governor has full authority over the decision making processes and budget management; recent political dynamics have complicated the functioning of the governorate under the legitimate Government of Yemen, however internationally funded conservation activities continue.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Despite the ongoing political conflict, Socotra has maintained civil peace for much of its history. The legitimate government of Yemen recognizes the special status of the archipelago and its position on the World Heritage List, and the importance of adhering to obligations of the World Heritage Convention (State Party of Yemen, 2016-2025). Environmental considerations are embedded in the activities and planning of all NGOs and Community-Based Organizations on the island (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Protection of the site is integrated in the National Strategic Planning documents, in line also with CBD and Aichi targets (see State of Conservation Report 2020). Capacity of local authorities to deal with the site management is limited, and ongoing projects are aiming to build capacity and provide sustainable funding mechanisms. Additional efforts are done by the newly structured EPA Yemen to integrate all planning and connectivity across projects (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Boundaries
The boundaries and buffer areas as defined in the 2000 SCZP are inadequate, which serve as the basis for the UNESCO property definition (National Park and Nature Sanctuaries together correspond to the Core Area). Revision of the SCZP is underway through the UNEP-GEF project. There are indications of land use pressures in the buffer zones, particularly adjacent to core areas, and a growing issue of land grabbing. This represents a harmful trend leading to land conversion into residential, tourism, and other land uses at the expense of more sustainable local development and expansion. Furthermore, a lack of demarcation or signage of the buffer zones makes it difficult for local communities and land users to recognize the boundaries of the World Heritage site (Abulhawa et al, 2013; State Party of Yemen, 2025). The revision of the SCZP should take into consideration the effective management of all existing and potential threats in the different zones.
Overlapping international designations
In addition to its inscription on the World Heritage List, Socotra was also designated as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in 2003 (UNESCO, 2003), there are 20 Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA) (KBA, 2025) which also include Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) (BirdLife International, 2025), and the coastal Detwah Lagoon on the northwestern side of the island was designated as a Ramsar site in 2007 (Ramsar, 2025). While regular communication between focal points of the different designations has been noted (State Party fo Yemen, 2021), no further information is available on the degree of collaboration and cooperation between management authorities.
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
The implementation of Committee decisions and recommendations has varied (see summary of Decisions in State Party of Yemen, 2025). Whilst the State Party continues to express its full commitment to conservation on Socotra, and steps are implemented via the support of international donor support, the ongoing insecurity and resulting economic impacts continue to significantly constrain the government’s capacity to implement requested management measures for the property, such as the finalisation of management and zoning plans, management capacity, biosecurity measures to address IAS, etc. (State Party of Yemen, 2025). Additionally, there are activities that are continuing in spite of Committee requests, such as infrastructure development including in sensitive areas in the absence of impact assessments undertaken in line with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context.
Climate action
In 2025, the government reports that implementation of GEF-7 project “Resilient and Sustainable Livelihoods for Rural Yemen” (ID: 10562), includes the aim to develop sustainable and resilient livelihoods for rural Yemeni by integrating climate change adaptation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable land management into key sectors such as agriculture, livestock, and fisheries. The government has also helped to conduct ongoing awareness campaigns about the risks of climate change, methods of adaptation and mitigation, and the importance of preserving biodiversity and environmental habitats in the Socotra Archipelago. A 2024 GEF/UNEP project assessing erosion and climate change showed a 2.5°C temperature rise and a 16% increase in mean annual rainfall by 2100. Severe water erosion threatens 36% of Socotra, with extreme erosion in 8%, and high wind erosion was observed, particularly along southern and middle northern shorelines. The fragile soil, vegetation, steep slopes, and high wind speeds necessitate an urgent master land use plan to mitigate land degradation (State Party of Yemen, 2025). However, it is unclear to what extent climate action is being addressed within the limited management capacity of the authorities.
Management plan and overall management system
The management system and capacity of government authorities on Socotra remain significantly limited due to the ongoing insecurity and economic situation in Yemen (State Party of Yemen 2020; 2022; 2025). There are currently no clear management plans for the individual protected areas in Socotra nor for the World Heritage property as a whole (IUCN Consultation, 2025). However, the government in 2025 reports that the UNEP-GEF project has supported management plans for four pilot sites (Homhil, Firmhin, Rosh and Dihamri) which were updated in participation with local communities and local authorities, and that a General Management Plan is in planning for 2026 pending available resources (State Party of Yemen, 2025). A first assessment of the PA management was completed several years ago (Van Damme and Saad, 2018), which considered that buffer zone management is not sufficiently aligned with core zone management, and boundaries of the core zone are not clear or indicated in the site. The Socotra Conservation Zoning Plan (SCZP) was approved in 2000 (UNDP-GEF, 2000), and a revision of the SCZP is undertaken through the UNEP-GEF project (UNESCO, 2020-2025). In 2025, reported progress includes implementation of a participatory approach to identify conservation zones totalling 426 km² including Firmhin, Homhil and Maalah, with four critical sites designated for full protection, however further resources are required for its finalisation. Individual management plans for these four pilot sites are reported to have been developed in participation with local communicates and local authorities (State Party of Yemen, 2025). The capacity of EPA representation at Socotra to manage the site continues to be limited. In 2013, the government declared the Socotra Archipelago as an independent governorate, and in 2016 appointed a deputy governor for the Environment, however this step did not lead to improved management of the site. Due to instability in mainland Yemen, adequate human and financial resources could not be delivered and the establishment of a separate management unit or independent management authority under the EPA remains to be implemented in light of capacity constraints (State Party of Yemen, 2020; 2025). Capacity building and improving management of the site is one of the main priorities of the ongoing conservation projects. A major challenge is to secure sustainable funding for conservation so that the management can continue into the long term.
Law enforcement
The fact that there is no archipelago-wide conservation authority with defined tasks, results in a major obstacle to conservation enforcement due to limited capacity (Abulhawa et al., 2013). The ongoing conflict on the mainland continues to limit financial resources and management (Saraf, 2021) and enforcement capacity has not received adequate national funding, however further improvement of the legislative framework and enforcement and management capacity is underway in cooperation with various ongoing projects and integrated in plans of future projects (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Sustainable finance
In light of the ongoing crisis in mainland Yemen, sustainable financing for Socotra remains a significant challenge and is still largely donor dependent. In 2025, the State Party reports the absence of a dedicated government budget for environmental conservation in Socotra and that the economic crisis has significantly slowed international development activities. In the absence of a dedicated budget, internationally funded projects are prioritised particularly under GEF, UNEP, the Franklinia Foundation, and other initiatives (e.g. Friends of Soqotra). Efforts are also underway to secure an additional $5,000,000 under GEF-8 to implement the “Integrated Conservation and Sustainable Development in Socotra Archipelago and Aden Wetlands, Yemen” project (State Party of Yemen, 2025). However, long-term sustainable financing remains lacking and an important priority to ensure the effective management of the property.
Staff capacity, training and development
The ongoing economic situation in mainland Yemen continues to limit financial resources for the government agencies responsible for nature conservation, and the capacity for management and enforcement has not received adequate national funding, however capacity building continues where possible under international projects (State Party of Yemen, 2025). Staff of EPA have received considerable capacity building support during previous years, but practical applicability and implementation reportedly is not always effective. Reduction of staff after discontinuation of large donor projects is a continued challenge, however the UNEP-GEF project has been implementing staff training programs and capacity building (State Party of Yemen, 2025). The EPA's capacity to manage the property successfully will depend on educating, training and winning the support of local people as well as foreign investors who acquired lands. Training has been carried out for guides, territorial, marine and archaeological, diver guides, drivers, including training in foreign languages (UNEP-WCMC, 2011), but due to shifts in economic priorities and the ongoing war, some concern exists that former investments are partially lost (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Education and interpretation programmes
Education and interpretation activities and materials were previously virtually absent, with the World Heritage status of property not being appropriately communicated. A special outreach campaign was to be launched in 2016, and an interpretation system at the airport was to be completed by the end of 2016 (State Party Report, 2016), however there is little evidence to suggest this was ever carried out (IUCN Consultation, 2020). More education and interpretation programs could be easily carried out in collaboration with State Party partners.
Tourism and visitation management
Tourist numbers have dropped significantly since the start of the political instabilities on mainland Yemen in 2015, however more recently the numbers of tourists have surged again due to the opening of chartered flights directly from Abu Dhabi which avoid stopovers on Yemen mainland and are therefore more attractive for international visitors. However, current systems for control and management remain limited, with the need for a comprehensive tourism carrying capacity assessment, as well as tourism that is sustainable and in collaboration with local Socotri communities, rather than foreign operators. A recent study noted that solid waste management, tourism infrastructure, and capacity building for tourism providers are key factors to consider to improve the site’s brand image, specifically for international tourism (Omer et al., 2023). The study has also suggested that tourism products, e.g., cultural heritage, Nature-based tourism, and Adventure sports, must be better positioned. The EPA intends to promote low impact ecotourism in accordance with a sustainable tourist business plan that benefits local communities without harming the OUV (State Party of Yemen, 2025), which remains to be implemented. The UNEP-GEF project includes an evaluation of ecotourism opportunities to assess the capacity of ecotourism, infrastructure needs, and proposed approach to sustain low impact eco-tourism. Basic infrastructure to serve tourists and promote environmentally friendly approaches has been established in four protected areas, and staff trained to enhance tourism services and utilise income (State Party of Yemen, 2025). Overall, tourism remains largely unregulated, it is important that a carrying capacity study and sustainable tourism strategy ensures that any future increase in tourism would not negatively impact the OUV in future and ensures sustainable livelihoods for updates.
Sustainable use
Grazing and fodder use throughout the property has been unsustainable and a threat to native flora (Maděra et al., 2019a; 2019b; Lvoncik et al., 2020), as provisions to deal with the overgrazing challenge in the 2008 decree on the property have not been implemented (Abulhawa & Abdulhalim, 2013). The same is true for marine resources use including inside marine core areas. Whilst there is some marine research with species numbers (Zajonz et al., 2019), no proper marine distribution and monitoring data is shared with government and management authorities which delays conservation planning by local decision makers (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Terrestrial data has been shared by various institutes, in detail. Some small scale positive examples of sustainable resource use exist, particularly bee-keeping and homegardens (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; Abulhawa & Abdulhalim, 2013). In 2025, a study of grazing types and impacts which aims to reduce overgrazing is being carried out by UNEP, Mendel University, and the government. Also, the aforementioned GEF-7 project includes grazing management and organisation. The government states there is a need to establish a monitoring plan for grazing, and it intends to improve grazing regulation, support alternative livelihood activities and explore mechanisms to reduce grazing impacts (State Party of Yemen, 2025).
Monitoring
There is some ad-hoc monitoring of the conservation status of the site such as turtle monitoring (State Party of Yemen, 2020-2025) and a RAPPAM was carried out under the UNEP-GEF project and completed in 2017 (Van Damme and Saad, 2018), however monitoring is almost entirely carried out under donor-funded projects and therefore capacity-building is required towards this. Some sporadic monitoring for birds is present every few years (e.g., Porter and Suleiman, 2016) and updates are provided but no temporal trends in decline, increase or shifts in populations that would allow to assess threats in an empirical manner. In 2025, the State Party reports that there is a need for an established monitoring plan and data compilation, for which local capacity (for training and staffing) remains absent (State Party of Yemen, 2025). Overall, besides the activities of the most recent UNE-GEF project, no active monitoring systems are established and the capacity of EPA staff remains too low to undertake monitoring and deal with priority challenges (State Party of Yemen, 2020). More effort should be undertaken towards ensuring monitoring systems, and training and materials are available, for example for dragonflies (Van Damme et al. 2020). The State Party is aware of these issues and actively promotes solutions through attracting donor funding for capacity building (State Party of Yemen, 2020).
Research
The islands are living laboratories of evolution, and the flora has been well researched since the late 1800s. In the late 1990s, a major multidisciplinary expedition was led, and a series of detailed studies began and continued through the following decades. A multidisciplinary zoological and botanical expedition began in 1999 to systematically inventory the whole fauna of the archipelago, and started investigations into the terrestrial vegetation and people, bird populations and fish and underwater habitats, marine turtle nesting, fishing and meteorology, and fauna of the extensive cave systems. Currently, terrestrial and freshwater faunas are increasingly well documented (Bezděk, & Hájek, 2017; Van Damme et al., 2020), as well as reptiles, bats and other groups (Razzetti et al. 2011; Benda et al., 2017) and updates on birds may be underway. The distribution, ecology and threats, in particular the impacts of over-grazing and climate change, of endemic vegetation has also been the focus of a number of studies (Hamdiah et al., 2022; Rezende et al., 2022; Bauerová et al., 2023; La Montagna et al., 2024; Maděra et al., 2024). Very little data has appeared on the marine environments, which hampers conservation. Knowledge on conservation status (IUCN Red List) needs to be urgently updated for birds and reptiles, and more invertebrates need to be listed. There is a need for more management-orientated knowledge generation and use and applied research linked to conservation interventions. There is some erosion of traditional knowledge about environmental management among the local population which has been recently revived (Sloan & Alawi, 2023). Research has been complicated at times due to the limited accessibility, and limited local capacity for independent monitoring and research, something that should be remediated in the future. However, research has continued and provides now a good baseline for conservation priorities and strategies (Attorre and Van Damme, 2020; Saraf, 2021).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Effective management remains constrained by limited financial resources and capacity (State Party of Yemen, 2025) as well as external political and development pressures. There is an urgent need for improved management of external pressures from resource use (including marine resources outside the property), sustainable tourism development and infrastructure development (including roads), and particularly port/airport systems for invasive alien species (IAS) (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011; Witt et al. 2020) and export of local goods. The increasing demand on land acquisition by foreign investors remains a major threat particularly in coastal areas of high scenic value (e.g. north east coast) (Abulhawa et al, 2014). The areas around Hadiboh are changing most rapidly, which is also visible in decline of biodiversity in aquatic species and the presence of pollution and insecticides (Van Damme et al. 2020). Therefore, threats outside the site, in these development zones, should be strongly monitored and some areas outside the site may need a formal protection here (e.g., the Hadiboh and Sirihin Lagoons; Van Damme et al., 2020).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Effective management remains constrained by limited financial resources and capacity (State Party of Yemen, 2025) as well as external political and development pressures. Detailed assessment of all the terrestrial protected areas in Socotra was carried out in the past assessing all threats and includes an adapted RAPPAM method (Van Damme and Saad, 2018; IUCN Consultation, 2020) however more recent developments would require updated assessments and enforcement of local laws and regulations. Marine site revision of PA management has not been successfully performed or shared with GoY (State Party of Yemen, 2020). Many groups of animals, plants, habitats, resources, livelihoods and cultural aspects, lack integrated management plans. Appointment of a new EPA Chair in Yemen in 2019 strongly increased positive efforts for management of the Site, in support of ongoing and new projects in capacity building and conservation (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
The management system and capacity of government authorities on the Socotra Archipelago remain significantly constrained by the ongoing insecurity in mainland Yemen, resulting economic impacts as well as external political, development and economic pressures. Capacity remains limited and sustainable long-term financing needs to be secured, with funding remaining mostly international donor dependent. A general management plan for the property is yet to be developed, with individual management plans having been developed for four pilot sites (Homhil, Firmhin, Rosh and Dihamri). A first assessment of protected area management was completed some years ago, which considered that buffer zone management is not sufficiently aligned with core zone management, and boundaries of the core zone are not clear or indicated in the site. A review of the Socotra Conservation Zoning Plan (SCZP) remains underway. Overall, there is a need to improve management through sustainable funding mechanisms and capacity building, to deal with the rapidly increasing pressures and threats to the archipelago’s values, including infrastructure development, exotic species, pollution, and unsustainable natural resource use and climate change and combined and related effects, as well as projected future tourism expansion. Priority areas could include the creation of an archipelago-wide management system that is adequately supported and that includes key stakeholders, an updated management plan (SCPZ) that responds to emerging threats, visitor management and the participation of local people in management, including schemes to promote sustainable natural resource use where possible. Ongoing and future conservation and development projects should take into consideration the vulnerability of the site, the importance of local culture and language, and aim for only sustainable outputs that remain after the lifetime of each activity; recent examples have shown that some activities are highly unsustainable (e.g., turtle monitoring) due to aims for short term outputs, but not long term biodiversity conservation. In addition, and unfortunately, there are no specific management plans yet for specific biotopes such as aquatic habitats and lagoons, caves, or other unique ecotopes that deserve special attention and are tied into general highly relevant resources (e.g., water).
Good practice examples
Empowering local communities to acquire a leading role in the management of their natural heritage within an effective collaborative management approach to biodiversity conservation and sustainable management of natural resources: After the termination of the SCDP program and decline of EPA capacity, at least five local associations were created with support from EPA and SCDP to oversee the management of the pilot Protected Areas established in mid 2000s. The local associations decided unilaterally to maintain the management programs for their respective areas regardless of the level of follow up and support provided by EPA, and subsequently maintained commendable levels of protection and maintenance (Abulhawa et al, 2013). However, in the current crisis (war and covid-19), the priorities have slightly shifted and local benefits of protected areas should be reframed. The current changes in local governance system have recognised the role of local communities in decision making and effective management of the islands (State Party Report, 2016), however with current political shifts, such roles may have to be redefined. It is clear that some examples of successful NGOs have been instrumental in providing champions for conservation, and which, with limited support, are able to produce long term conservation outputs. One such Best Practice Example is the Al Tamek Association for the restoration of the Mangrove Tree, who in collaboration with FoS and ARC-WH, locally led and established/replanted mangrove trees in the north coast (Van Damme, 2019). Other examples include the honey cooperative which is one of the most successful sustainable activities on the island (linking livelihoods to ecology) which have been active over a longer period (Cheung and DeVantier, 2006), the Woman Association who are instrumental in local education and awareness activities, and the local management (and maintenance of traditional fishing rules) in the marine protected area Rosh by local communities. Finally, eradication activities of Opuntia were met with strong enthusiasm of local communities, predominantly led by women (CABI, 2018), and the Dragon's Blood Tree Nursery supported Mendel University but entirely implemented and led by a local family (Keybani), is unique in the world, and provides the first artificially grown Dracaena cinnabari trees of 15 years in Socotra. Such local champions should be continuously sought as they are the true managers and owners of the land, for generations to come. In addition, high efforts of several organisations (FoS, CABI, BirdLife International, UNESCO) to increase awareness and show best practice examples of the site, have strongly positive effects and international engagement to help local communities in their requests to manage local resources and biodiversity. One such example is the connect2socotra campaign and conferences on Socotra biodiversity and culture (Van Damme and Livadiotti, 2020).
Complex assemblage of unique ecosystems
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Socotra is relatively pristine in comparison to other islands, but increasingly affected by degradation of vegetation, soil erosion through overgrazing, fragmentation, and coastal areas acquisitions including marine resource use; recent scientific evidence points towards a decline in populations of key species (trees) through a combination of decades of overgrazing and the impacts of climate change (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; Abulhawa & Abdulhalim, 2013; Abulhawa et al, 2014; Attorre and Van Damme, 2020; Saraf, 2021; Hamdiah et al., 2022; La Montagna et al., 2024). Little data is available for marine ecosystems, and all such data should be shared with GoY for conservation planning.
Endemic flora and vegetation
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Only a few species have been lost in the 20th century (Van Damme and Banfield 2011). Some key species continue to decline (e.g. Draceana cinnabari, Boswellia, and Commiphora species which may go extinct within the next centuries under business as usual scenarios) (Madera et al., 2019b; Attorre and Van Damme, 2020; Lvoncik et al., 2020; La Montagna et al., 2024; Maděra et al., 2024). 157 plant species are listed as critically endangered, endangered or vulnerable, but the list needs updating (UNEP-WCMC, 2011). Stands of Boswellia and Dracaena, already affected by lack of regeneration because of overgrazing, suffered a significant impact from the cyclones that hit in November 2015 and May, 2018, resulting in the loss of 38% of all mature Boswellia trees in some places and an additional 29% in the following years (IUCN Consultation, 2020; Lvoncik et al., 2020). Intensive grazing, aimed collection, invasive plant and animal species, soil erosion, impacts of wood collection and impacts of roads and other development represent ongoing threats to terrestrial habitats and flora (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; Abulhawa et al, 2014, Maděra et al., 2019a; 2019b; Attorre and Van Damme, 2020; Rezende et al., 2020; Hamdiah et al., 2022; La Montagna et al., 2024; Maděra et al., 2024). At present however, the (current) distribution of trees for example is mainly governed by natural, not human factors (Riccardi et al., 2020). In addition, the decline of local resource use of the environment and cultural link with the ecosystems may lead to further impacts on the vegetation (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011; Saraf, 2021).
Endemic reptiles with their habitats
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
No endemic reptile species are reported lost since the 20th century, which is remarkable in comparison to other islands in the world (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011). In fact, several species were described as new in the last decades. All terrestrial reptiles on Socotra Island have now been assessed and appear on the IUCN Red List, some have an area of occupancy less than 10 km². The habitats of the terrestrial reptiles are under serious threat as most of the species are closely related to vegetation (see previous value) and other substrates for foraging (Fasola et al., 2020). Therefore, wood collection, stone collection, loss of trees through storms, habitat fragmentation through development, decline of food (insecticides/pollution), decreased quality of all shrubland and woodland habitats in the island have all been identified (IUCN Red List assessments, 2020; IUCN Consultation, 2020). The current Conservation Zoning Plan is inadequate to protect the diversity, including high genetic diversity, of the Socotra reptiles (Vasconcelos et al., 2018; 2020). There are currently no studies that compare former distributions and species richness with the current situation to assess decline. However, considering the suggestions of decline of natural plant populations, impacts of climate change, and developments in coastal zones, the endemic reptiles associated with these areas should be considered as high concern. The Dragon’s Blood tree (Dracaena), as well as other flora species, is considered vital for the existence of some of the endemic reptiles, therefore, the deterioration of some of these trees inevitably means losing these reptiles as a result (IUCN Consultation, 2020; Saraf, 2021).
Endemic and endangered birds with their habitats
Low Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
No endemic bird species has been lost since the 20th century, which is remarkable in comparison to other islands in the world (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). Three endemic species are classified as vulnerable, one as near-threatened, and six as least concern on the IUCN Red List of threatened species (IUCN, 2013; BirdLife International, 2020). This may require updating following the 2020 Red List review (BirdLife International, 2020). In addition to the endemic species, the Egyptian Vulture is endangered and the Jouanin’s Petrel near threatened (BirdLife International 2025a). Considering the aforementioned combined long term effects of overgrazing and direct effects of climate change impacts, and decline of vegetation productivity in biodiversity-rich areas in particular in the mountains (Rezende et al., 2020), among other effects such as increased (and expected future increase of) insecticide use, endemic bird species should be considered at low concern at present, but should be monitored closely as their environment is deteriorating. In particular, the worrying trend of capture of the Socotra Buzzard for export, indicates a disruption between local people and their link to endemic and endangered birds, which should be met with awareness activities. There is currently no information whether populations are deteriorating or stable, because there is not enough data/monitoring (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Endemic invertebrates with their habitats
Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Recent studies have provided comprehensive data on the invertebrate taxa on Socotra (Bezděk & Hájek, 2017; Purchart et al., 2020), including sensitive cave crustaceans (Fransen and Van Damme, 2018). The conservation status of invertebrates in general is not assessed (except dragonflies, freshwater crabs and endemic freshwaer molluscs). No endemic mollusc species are known to be lost since the 20th century, however two freshwater molluscs have not been recorded since they were discovered (Van Damme & Banfield, 2011). One recent study indicates that invertebrate species richness in some areas in Socotra are declining, even including the extinction of one (native but not endemic) species, in a case study of dragonflies as flagship species for the aquatic environment; the decline in the Hadiboh area, over 50 years, is attributed mainly to urbanisation, loss of vegetation and pollution (Van Damme et al., 2020). With the current loss of vegetation (overgrazing, climate change), stone collection and wood collection, it is likely that invertebrate species (both terrestrial and subterraneous) are affected as well. For most groups, very little comparison of trends over time is available. For the dragonflies at least, we can say the trend is deteriorating in some areas (in the buffer zone).
Coastal/marine biodiversity and habitats
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Marine communities reportedly are somewhat unclear due to the lack of data shared with the GoY, but likely to be deteriorating (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The species richness of the archipelago remains higher than in any of the adjacent Arabian ecoregions (Zajonz et al., 2019). Increasingly, they are affected by unsustainable use in some areas already since a while (Van Damme and Banfield, 2011). Increasing pressures in land acquisition in coastal areas present a serious threat to associated marine ecosystems and adjacent terrestrial ones (Abulhawa and Abdul Halim, 2013). Reports on commercial export of fish, squid, octopus, sea cucumber, shark, although known before the nomination of the WH Site (Cheung and DeVantier, 2006) have accelerated in recent years through foreign pressures and are therefore worrying. The deliberate hunting of sea turtles during nesting season is an example of a loss of connection between local people and their environment, and unsustainable approaches to their conservation which need to be remediated as soon as possible. Positive here is that EPA on Socotra is strongly engaged to support conservation of marine species, however challenges are large and often uncontrolled. The 2025 State Party report highlights that targeted protection and monitoring programs were established for Caretta caretta sea turtle nesting seasons at Abelhan Nature Sanctuary, which supports a globally threatened species listed under the CITES Convention. The programmes supported by the GEF-UNEP (#5347) project, RSCN, and EPA for the past four years have been critical in safeguarding the species during their annual nesting season from April to September. The project has also facilitated training for staff members from the Socotra Turtle Protection Association, representatives of the local community, and other key stakeholders, ensuring the program is sustainably managed and effectively implemented (State Party of Yemen, 2025). The 2025 report also states that the problem of waste management in Socotra, in particular in the buffer zone, remains. Plastic waste is accumulating along the coast – a concerted effort by donors and support by other countries is needed, given the limited finances.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
Most of the existing key values enjoyed a relatively stable and satisfactory conservation status until the end of the 20th Century, mainly due to Socotra’s isolation and the traditional governance and management systems found on the archipelago, leading to the typical Socotran cultural landscapes. Examining trends over the last twenty years reveals an even higher biodiversity, than was known in 2008 in terrestrial, aquatic and marine environments. Some studies indicate that the current protection measures (from 2000) may be inadequate to conserve the main biodiversity, as most of the biodiversity data was not compiled at the time, and threats have increased, however measures are also underway to update the Socotra Conservation Zoning Plan and individual management plans. Research compiling data of the last 20 years, indicates that deterioration is visible in key species or rapidly changing areas, in particular accelerated by overgrazing and climate change impacts. The conservation status of reptiles and invertebrates is of concern due to climate change effects, the threats of exotic species, and deterioration of the woodlands/vegetation, considering the current trends. The status of ecosystems and endemic flora, has also begun to deteriorate (e.g., decline of vegetation in the mountain areas), with further deterioration predicted, following rapid ongoing changes that affect the terrestrial environment. Unfortunately, not much information is available or shared concerning trends in the marine environment over the last decades, however there is enough circumstantial evidence to suggest that the marine and coastal environments are impacted, especially due to externally-driven overfishing as well as the recent hurricanes which affected coral reef systems (e.g. Dihamri Protected Area), but further scientific studies are needed to estimate the full extend. As the complex political and economic situation continues, the State Party, through the local authorities and EPA, continues to show engagement to address threats with significantly limited capacity. The assessment of the current state of World Heritage values therefore remains of high concern.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
High Concern
Deteriorating
The biodiversity-related cultural values, language related to environment, traditional knowledge and practices (including ethnobotanical practices and traditional resource use) are increasingly deteriorating due to socioeconomic transformations, political instability, external pressures, and challenged by the difficulty in aimed conservation on this aspect of the human-nature link. These values, knowledge and practice are critical for the long term sustainability of the islands natural heritage (Sloan & Alawi, 2023).
Additional information
Livestock grazing areas
Strong traditional livestock economy based on goats, as well as cattle and sheep to a lesser extent (Morris, 2002), with a strong contribution to local livelihoods.
The socioeconomic transformations as well as infrastructure development (e.g. road construction) are increasing local users access to remote resources and changing their patterns of use in terms of distribution and duration.
Collection of genetic material
The rich endemic biota of the property offer the opportunity to exploit genetic materials of potential economic use.
Research efforts on documentation and collection of genetic resources have been drastically declining due to weak governance and lack of financial and human resources. The conditions are foreseen to improve under the new UNEP implemented project (State Party Report, 2016).
Fishing areas and conservation of fish stocks
The coastal waters around Socotra contribute greatly to the diet and livelihood of the local population and have the potential to support a considerable sustainable fishing industry, if managed wisely (Cheung & DeVantier, 2006). The current trend in marine resources is moving rapidly into less sustainable practices due to lack of proper management, monitoring and law enforcement.
Coastal habitats destruction due to land acquisition and infrastructure development and over-exploitation of marine resources due to economic transformations, lack of good governance, and weak management and law enforcement represent major threats to the marine ecosystems services associated with the provision of food (Abulhawa and Abdul Halim, 2014).
Importance for research,
Contribution to education,
Collection of genetic material
The site has contributed to traditional knowledge, the scientific understanding of island biogeography, conservation biology, climate change and other subject areas, and continues to support relevant scientific research and publications (UNEP-WCMC, 2011). The site provides an outdoor learning environment for local communities, researchers, and visitors to the islands. It offers a mosaic platform for exchange of knowledge and experiences among inhabitants, users and interest groups.
The continuation of the factors negatively affecting this benefit will lead to successive erosion of knowledge and learning derived form the site thus negatively impacting traditional practices related to the sustainable utilization of the land and sea and their resources.
Wilderness and iconic features,
Cultural identity and sense of belonging
Although the limited accessibility and unfavorable framework conditions have precluded strong tourism development in the past, the iconic wilderness values and unique biota of the island have great potential benefits, including for tourism.
The inter-linkages between cultural values, traditional knowledge and practices and the conservation of natural heritage are weakened by the accelerating trends of socioeconomic transformations in the islands and continuing political instability in Yemen.
Traditional agriculture
Cultivation of date palms has been carried out for hundreds of years, and are an integral part of many Socotrans' livelihoods and culture. Dates are an important part of the diet, and are preserved to be eaten throughout the year. Almost the entire date palm is used as food for people or cattle, for building, weaving, or as fuel (Cheung & DeLevantier, 2006)
The site has limited capacity for horticulture development due to scarcity of water resources, harsh climatic conditions and lack of traditional knowledge and practices associated with it.
Apart from its tremendous global conservation value, the Socotra archipelago also supports significant traditional natural resource based economies such as livestock rearing and fishing which represents the main sources of local communities income. It is argued that the site will always have these economic activities as the main driver of local economy. Nonetheless, it has a potential for further knowledge generation and wilderness based, responsible tourism. Overall, the current sociopolitical and economic trends are negatively impacting the site's capacity to provide sustainable economic growth for its people.
| № | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friends of Socotra (charity) | Various small research and conservation projects, past and ongoing, and annual scientific Socotra conferences focusing on awareness, conservation, biodiversity and culture. The non-profit, non-governmental organisation is entirely run by volunteers in support of conservation activities and publications. One of the most recent on-the-ground activities (small funds), ongoing, is a mangrove replantation plot on the north coast of Socotra (started with ARC-WH and together with EPA and implemented by the local Al Tamek Association for the Protection of the Mangrove). Recent wide awareness activities for biodiversity and threats were organised jointly in the UNESCO-FoS campaign connect2socotra. |
http://www.friendsofsoqotra.org/
Connect2socotra campaign - https://en.unesco.org/connect2socotra
|
| 2 | GIZ, UNDP, IFAD, UNEP, FRC | Since 2012, several projects and initiatives (including the GIZ project) were signed between the Yemeni government and international partners. Several of these projects addressed the restructuring and empowerment of the EPA (State Party Report, 2016), currently one is ongoing (GEF-UNE #5347), no ongoing projects now in Socotra by GIZ. | |
| 3 | (Green Climate Fund) | Not currently active, however the Yemeni government is negotiating access to funds from the Green Climate Fund in collaboration with UNEP and international partners (State Party Report, 2016). | |
| 4 | UNEP-GEF Project #5347 | GEF-funded project executed by RSCN to support the Government of Yemen (from the GoY side, executed by EPA and Ministry of Water and Environment of Yemen) under the guidance of UN Environment in coordination with local NGOs and international partners/institutes (Sapienza, CABI, Mendel, Ghent University, etc) for technical support. The project focuses on tackling major issues, primarily related to Biodiversity and Protected Area Management, Invasive Alien Species, Sustainable Land Management and local Capacity Building and Training. Until 2023 with potential extensions. |
https://www.thegef.org/project/support-integrated-program-conservation-and-sustainable-development-socotra-archipelago
|
| 5 | Franklinia Boswellia Project | The Franklinia Project in Socotra (January 1st, 2020-Dec 31st, 2022) has a small budget entirely devoted to local capacity building, replantation and training to protect the endangered endemic Boswellia species of the Socotra Archipelago. The project goal is to achieve adequate conservation for at least eight endemic Boswellia species occurring on Socotra Island and to protect their ecosystems. The Boswellia trees on Socotra Island are under threat (lack of regeneration because of overgrazing, and destruction by climate change effects), therefore this small project answers a joint call from EPA, the local authorities, the local communities and scientists to take the necessary conservation measures. The proposal was specifically designed by several institutes to provide some species-oriented support and local training. Socotri based in Brno and on Socotra steer the project, with technical support by other conservationists. | |
| 6 | SGP - Small Grants Programme (GEF) | Small Grants Programme of GEF, implemented by UNDP, for small-scale localised and targeted activities on Socotra, mainly related to development (reparation of waterwells, construction of water reservoirs, etc), sometimes development-conservation. |
https://sgp.undp.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=296:improved-water-resources-management-in-the-mala-plateau-on-socotra-island&catid=36:our-stories&Itemid=186
|
| 7 | FAO | Food security and Agriculture in several areas in Yemen, including Socotra. |
http://www.fao.org/neareast/news/view/en/c/1287492/
|
| 8 | The Arab Regional Centre for World Heritage funded by the World Heritage Fund (WHF) | Mitigation of hurricane impacts on endemic and threatened plants of Socotra Archipelago. The project targets two main tree species the Frankincense trees (Boswellia socotrana Balf. f.) which is a vulnerable species reference to the IUCN Red List assessment, and the Dragoon Blood trees (Dracaena cinnabari) for building nurseries and plots to enhance the conservation and protection of those 2 main targeted species and the fence is going also to protect the new plants from goats and eventually, natural regeneration. |
www.arcwh.org
|
| 9 | UNEP / GEF | To effectively conserve biodiversity in the Socotra Archipelago and sustainably manage the Aden wetlands in Yemen. Approved in 2024. |
https://www.thegef.org/projects-operations/projects/11408
|
| 10 | Ministry of Water and Environment (MOWE) , Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, UNDP | Project Objective: Strengthen governmental and non-governmental capacities sustainably to manage and protect the Socotra Archipelago WHS through BD conservation, IAS management and SLM 18 November 2015 - 31 December 2024 |
https://www.unep.org/gef/projects/support-integrated-program-conservation-and-sustainable-development-socotra-archipelago
|
| 11 | Multiple | A list of various projects on Socotra Island is provided in the 2025 State Party report to the World Heritage Committee. |
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1263/documents/
|
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
Abulhawa, T. and Abdulhalim, H. (2013). ‘Report on the mission to Socotra Archipelago, Republic of Yemen from 4 to 14 November, 2012’. UNESCO World Heritage Centre and IUCN. [Electronic reference] . Accessed 23 May 2013.
|
| 2 |
Abulhawa, T., Abdulhalim, H., Osipova, E., Cummings, T. (2014). TABE’A II Report – Enhancing Regional Capacities for World Heritage. Amman, Jordan: IUCN. ii + 74pp.
|
| 3 |
Attore, F., Francesconi, F., Taleb, N., Scholte, P., Saeed, A., Alfo, M. and Bruno, F. (2007). ‘Will dragonblood survive the next period of climate change? Current and future potential distribution of Dracaena cinnabari (Socotra, Yemen).’ Biological Conservation 138: 430-439.
|
| 4 |
Attorre, F, Van Damme K (2020). Twenty years of biodiversity research and conservation in the Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00941-7.
|
| 5 |
Banfield L, Van Damme K, Miller AG (2011) Evolution and biogeography of the flora of the Socotra archipelago (Yemen), in: Bramwell D, Caujapé-Castells J (Eds) The Biology of Island Floras, pp 197-225.
|
| 6 |
Bauerová, L., Maděra, P., Šenfeldr, M., & Habrová, H. (2023). Age Estimation of Dracaena cinnabari Balf. f. on Socotra Island: A Direct Method to Determine Its Lifespan. Forests, 14(4), 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040840
|
| 7 |
Benda P, Nasher AK, Van Damme K, Vallo P, Reiter A. 2017. Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Part 14. Bat fauna of the Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. Acta Soc Zool Bohem. 81:99–169
|
| 8 |
Bezdek J, Hájek J (2017) Insect biodiversity of the Socotra Archipelago – underlined and counted. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 57 (Suppl.): 1-39.
|
| 9 |
Bezděk, J., & Hájek, J. (2017). Insect biodiversity of the Socotra Archipelago–underlined and counted. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 57(s1), 1-39.
|
| 10 |
BirdLife International (2013a). ‘Datazone: Endemic Bird Area Search’. [Electronic reference] . Accessed 7 May 2013.
|
| 11 |
BirdLife International (2025). IBA DataZone - Socotra, Yemen. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/search?search=socotra. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 12 |
BirdLife International (2025a). IBA DataZone - Egyptian Vulture, Neophron percnopterus and Jouanin's Petrel, Bulweria Fallax. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/egyptian-vu… and https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/jouanins-pe… [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 13 |
CABI (2018). CABI works in partnership to help rid UNESCO Natural World Heritage site Socotra of common pest pear Opuntia stricta. URL: https://www.cabi.org/news-article/cabi-works-in-partnership…. Date accessed: August 1st, 2020.
|
| 14 |
Cheung, C. and DeVantier, L. (2008). ‘Socotra – a natural history of the islands and their people’. In: Van Damme, K. (Ed.): Odyssey Books and Guides, Airphoto International Ltd., Hongkong, 408 pp.
|
| 15 |
Conservation International (2013). ‘The Biodiversity Hotspots: Horn of Africa’. [Electronic reference] . Accessed 13 May 2013.
|
| 16 |
Fasola M, Razzetti E, Sindaco R, Ziliani U, Delle Monache D, Pellitteri-Rosa D, Vasconcelos R, Carranza S (2020) Ecological preferences of the endemic reptile community of Socotra. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00922-w
|
| 17 |
Fransen CH, Van Damme K (2018) A new stygobiont species of Halocaridinides Fujino & Shokita, 1975 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) from caves on Socotra Island (Yemen), with notes on the genus. Zootaxa. 4442(2): 241-261
|
| 18 |
Hamdiah S., Eler K., Van Damme K., Attorre F., La Montagna D., De Sanctis M., Shaneyehen M., Amar M., Marfo T.D., Maděra P. (2024). Overgrazing strongly impedes the natural regeneration of the endemic Boswellia species on Socotra Island. J. For. Sci., 70: 249–263. https://doi.org/10.17221/3/2024-JFS
|
| 19 |
IUCN (2014). Assessing the Management of Socotra World Heritage Site. (3 February 2014). [Electronic reference] . Accessed 4 December 2016.
|
| 20 |
IUCN (2018). ‘IUCN advises in-danger status for Yemen’s Socotra Archipelago World Heritage site’, IUCN, Gland, 18 June. Available at: https://www.iucn.org/news/iucn-42whc/201806/iucn-advises-da… (Accessed on 13/06/2019).
|
| 21 |
IUCN Consultation (2025). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation form: Socotra Archipelago, Yemen
|
| 22 |
KBA (2025). Key Biodiversity Areas - Socotra, Yemen. Available at: https://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/sites-table. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 23 |
Kalivodová H, Culek M, Čermák M, Maděra P, Habrová H (2020). Potential importance of Socotra dragon’s blood tree cloud forests and woodlands for capturing horizontal precipitation. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00933-7
|
| 24 |
La Montagna D, Attorre F, Hamdiah S, Madera P, Malatesta L, Vahalík P, Van Damme K ˇ and De Sanctis M (2023) Climate change effects on the potential distribution of the endemic Commiphora species (Burseraceae) on the island of Socotra. Front. For. Glob. Change 6:1183858. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1183858
|
| 25 |
Lvončík S, Vahalík P, Bongers F, Peijenburg J, Hušková K, van Rensburg JJ, Hamdiah S, Madĕra P (2020) Development of the Boswellia elongata Balf. F. frankincense tree population in Homhil Nature Sanctuary Socotra Island (Yemen). Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00936-4
|
| 26 |
Maděra , P., Vahalík, P., Hamdiah, S.,Huˇsková, K., Sekava, J., Attorre, F., La Montagna, D., DeSanctis, M., Netek, R., Bongers, F., Rivers, M., ˇSebesta, J.,Amar, M., Keybani, S., Shanayeghen, M., & Van Damme, K. (2024). Distribution, ecology, and threats assessment of 11endemic frankincense tree taxa (Boswellia) in the Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). Plants, People, Planet, 6(6), 1552–1571.https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10563MADˇERA ET AL . 1571
|
| 27 |
Maděra, P., Habrová, H., Šenfeldr, M., Kholová, I., Lvončík, S., Ehrenbergerová, L., Roth, M., Nadezhdina, N., Němec, P., Rosenthal, J. and Pavliš, J. (2019a). Growth dynamics of endemic Dracaena cinnabari Balf. f. of Socotra Island suggest essential elements for a conservation strategy. Biologia, 74(4), pp.339-349.
|
| 28 |
Maděra, P., Volařík, D., Patočka, Z., Kalivodová, H., Divín, J., Rejžek, M., ... & Amer, A. S. (2019b). Sustainable land use management needed to conserve the dragon’s blood tree of Socotra Island, a vulnerable endemic umbrella species. Sustainability, 11(13), 3557.
|
| 29 |
Miller AG, Morris M (2004) Ethnoflora of the Soqotra Archipelago. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, UK, p 759
|
| 30 |
Morris, M. (2002). ‘Manual of traditional land use in the Soqotra Archipelago’. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden (unpubl.).
|
| 31 |
Neubert E (2006) Land Snails of the Socotra Archipelago. In: Cheung C, DeVantier L (edited by Van Damme K), Socotra: A natural history of the islands and their people, Hong Kong: Odyssey Books and Guides, Airphoto International Ltd., pp 125-127.
|
| 32 |
Neubert E, Bochud E (2020) The continental malacofauna of Arabia and adjacent areas, VII. The family Achatinidae (Coeliaxinae,Subulininae) in the Socotran Archipelago (Gastropoda, Pulmonata). Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00920-y
|
| 33 |
Omer, A. A., Sawant, M., Ragde, R. (2023). International Tourists' Perceptions Towards Destination Brand Image: A Case Study of Socotra Island, Yemen. Journal of Tourism Insights: Vol. 13: Iss. 1, Article 9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9707/2328-0824.1298
|
| 34 |
Peutz N (2018) Islands of heritage conservation and transformation in Yemen. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, USA
|
| 35 |
Porter, R.F. and Suleiman, A.S. 2016. The Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas of the Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. Sandgrouse 38(2): 169 – 191.
|
| 36 |
Porter, R.F., Suleiman, A.S. 2013. The populations and distribution of the breeding birds of the Socotra archipelago, Yemen: 1. Sandgrouse to Buntings. Sandgrouse 35: 43–81.
|
| 37 |
Porter, RF, Kirwan, GM (2010) Studies of Socotran birds VI. The taxonomic status of the Socotra Buzzard. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 130(2): 116-131.
|
| 38 |
Purchart L, Hula V, Fric ZF (2020) Comparison of biogeographic origin among three arthropod groups in the Socotra Archipelago. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00926-6
|
| 39 |
Ramsar Sites Information Service (2025). Detwah Lagoon, Yemen. Available at: https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1736. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 40 |
Razzetti E, Sindaco R, Grieco C, Pella F, Ziliani U, Pupin F, Riservato E, Pellitteri-Rosa D, Butikofer L, Suleiman AS, Ba A-A, Carugati C, Boncompagni E, Fasola M (2011) Annotated checklist and distribution of the Socotran archipelago herpetofauna (Reptilia). Zootaxa 2826:1–44
|
| 41 |
Rezende M, Riccardi T, Malatesta L, Attorre F, Van Damme K (2020) Land productivity dynamics in Socotra Island (Yemen). Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00928-4
|
| 42 |
Rezende, M., Madˇera, P., Vahalík, P., Van Damme, K., Habrová, H., Riccardi, T., Attorre, F., De Sanctis, M., Sallemi, G., Malatesta, L. (2022). Identifying Suitable Restoration and Conservation Areas for Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. in Socotra, Yemen. Forests 2022, 13, 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081276 A
|
| 43 |
Riccardi T, Malatesta L, Van Damme K, Suleiman AS, Farcomeni A, Rezende M, Vahalík P, Attorre F (2020) Environmental factors and human activity as drivers of tree cover and density on the Island of Socotra, Yemen. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00923-9
|
| 44 |
Saraf, S. (2021) Preserving the Perishing Endangered Nat ural Biodiversity of Socotra Island. Open Journal of Ecology, 11, 148-162. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2021.11201
|
| 45 |
Scholte, P. et al. (2008). Goats: Part of the Problem or the Solution to Biodiversity Conservation on Socotra? Socotra Conservation and Development Programme. Hadibo, Socotra, Yemen.
|
| 46 |
Sloan, L. M., & Alawi, A. A. O. B. (2023). Sustainable Environmental Practices of Socotra People. In A Social View of Socotra Island: People, Culture, Heritage (pp. 23-52). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
|
| 47 |
State Party of Yemen (2021). Periodic Report Third Cycle Section II: Socotra Archipelago. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, pp.1-86. Available at: <https://whc.unesco.org/document/217720>. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 48 |
State Party of Yemen (2021). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/217720 [Accessed on 21 May 2025]
|
| 49 |
State Party of Yemen (2022). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). [online] State Party of Yemen, pp.1-58. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/191577. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 50 |
State Party of Yemen (2025). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). [online] State Party of Yemen, pp.1-58. Available at: <https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1263/documents/> [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 51 |
State Party of Yemen. (2016). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). [online] Ministry of Water & Environment, Environment Protection Authority. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1263/documents/.
|
| 52 |
State Party of Yemen. (2018). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). [online] Ministry of Water & Environment, Environment Protection Authority. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1263/documents/ (Accessed 22 October 2019).
|
| 53 |
State Party of Yemen. (2020). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). [online] Ministry of Water & Environment, Environment Protection Authority. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1263/documents/ (Accessed 5 March 2020).
|
| 54 |
Suleiman, A. S., Meier, G. G., and Haverson, P. J. (2010). ‘Confirmed eradication of the House Crow from Socotra Island, Republic of Yemen’. Wildlife Middle East 4: 4.
|
| 55 |
Tamar, K., Simó- Riudalbas, M., Garcia-Porta, J., Santos, X., Llorente, G., Vasconcelos, R. & Carranza, S. (20 19). An integrative study of island diversification: Insights from the endemic Haemodracon geckos of the Socotra Archipelago. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 133: 166-175. doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.01.009
|
| 56 |
UNDP-GEF (2000) The Conservation Zoning Plan of Socotra Islands. Presidential Decree no. 275 of the year 2000. UNDP-GEF Socotra Biodiversity Project YEM/96/G32. English Version. Available at http://www.friendsofsoqotra.org/Bibliography/pdfs/Zoning%20… (accessed Aug 1, 2020)
|
| 57 |
UNEP-WCMC (2011). Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. UNEP-WCMC World Heritage Information Sheets. [Electronic reference] . Accessed 12 December 2016.
|
| 58 |
UNESCO (2003). Socotra Archipelago - Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/mab/socotra-archipelago. Accessed 15 February 2025.
|
| 59 |
UNESCO. (2013). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online) Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/1925. (Accessed on 4 December 2016).
|
| 60 |
UNESCO. (2015). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online) Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3233 (Accessed on 4 December 2016).
|
| 61 |
UNESCO. (2016). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online) Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3461 (Accessed on 4 December 2016).
|
| 62 |
UNESCO. (2018). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online) Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3763 (Accessed on 28 June 2019).
|
| 63 |
UNESCO. (2019). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3891 (Accessed 22 October 2019).
|
| 64 |
UNESCO. (2021). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4140. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 65 |
UNESCO. (2023). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4330. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 66 |
UNESCO. (2024). Report on the State of Conservation of Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4640. [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 67 |
Van Damme K (2018) A record of Notostraca on Socotra Island and the importance of local conservation of the habitat. Zootaxa 4446:555-566.
|
| 68 |
Van Damme K, Benda P, Van Damme D, De Geest P, Hajdas I (2018) The first vertebrate fossil from Socotra (Yemen) is an early Holocene Egyptian fruit bat. Journal of Natural History 52: 2001-2024.
|
| 69 |
Van Damme K, Livadiotti M (2020) The Palermo Meeting—Socotra’s pursuit of stability. Jemen Rep 51:12–16
|
| 70 |
Van Damme K, Vahalík P, Ketelaar R, Jeziorski P, Bouwman J, Morris M, Suleiman AS, Dumont HJ (2020) Dragonfies of Dragon’s blood island: atlas of the odonata of the Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00942-6
|
| 71 |
Van Damme, K (2011) Insular biodiversity in a changing world - Who can protect Yemen's invaluable natural treasures during times of political upheaval and change? Nature Middle East 2011:61. doi:10.1038/nmiddleeast.2011.61
|
| 72 |
Van Damme, K (2019) The first replanted mangrove trees in the north coast of Socotra. Tayf 16: 12-13. Available at: https://www.friendsofsoqotra.org/Activities/pdfs/Tayf%2016%…
|
| 73 |
Van Damme, K. & Saad, A., 2018. Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management on Socotra Island – Terrestrial PA Assessment 2016-2017. UNEP-GEF Project ‘Support to the Integrated Program for the Conservation and Sustainable Development of the Socotra Archipelago’ (GEF FSP # 5347). Report to United Nations Environment and Ministry of Water and Environment, Yemen. Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Frankfurt a.M., Germany. 1-101 pp.
|
| 74 |
Van Damme, K. and Banfield, L. (2011). ‘Past and present human impacts on the biodiversity of Socotra Island (Yemen): implications for future conservation.’ Zoology in the Middle East Supplementum 3, 2011: 31-89.
|
| 75 |
Vasconcelos R, Pujol-Buxó E, Llorente EA, Saeed A, Carranza S (2020) Micro-hotspots for conservation: an umbrella tree species for the unique Socotran reptile fauna. Forests 11(3):353. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030353
|
| 76 |
Vasconcelos R, Razgour O, Tarroso P, Fasola M, Carranza S, Alves PC (2018) Combining molecular and landscape tools for targeting evolutionary processes in reserve design: An approach for islands. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0200830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200830
|
| 77 |
WWF (2013). ‘List of Priority Global 200 Ecoregions: Socotra Island Desert’. [Electronic reference] . Accessed 13 May 2013.
|
| 78 |
WWF and IUCN (1994). ‘Volume 1: Europe, Africa, South West Asia and the Middle East’. In: Centres of Plant Diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: WWF and IUCN.
|
| 79 |
Witt A, Hula V, Suleiman AS, Van Damme K (2020) First record of the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) on Socotra Island (Yemen), an exotic pest with high potential for adverse economic impacts. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-020-00918-6
|
| 80 |
Witt, A., Abdullah, A.S.S. (2023). Guide to the naturalized, invasive and potentially invasive plants of Socotra, Yemen, CABI, Wallingford, UK, 238pp. Available at https://blog.invasive-species.org/2024/04/29/cabi-publishes….
|
| 81 |
Zajonz, U., Lavergne, E., Bogorodsky, S. V., Saeed, F. N., Aideed, M. S., & Krupp, F. (2019). Coastal fish diversity of the Socotra Archipelago, Yemen. Zootaxa, 4636(1), 1-108.
|
| 82 |
van Harten T, Forrest A, Porter R, Van Damme K, Miller AG, Knees S, Wong LJ, Pagad S (2025) Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species - Soqotra, Yemen. Version 2.13. Invasive Species Specialist Group ISSG. Checklist dataset. http://doi.org/10.15468/0i0w8g. Available at: https://cloud.gbif.org/griis/resource?r=yemen-soqotra-griis…. Accessed 1 March 2025.
|
| 83 |
van Harten T, Forrest A, Porter R, Van Damme K, Miller AG, Knees S, Wong LJ, Pagad S (2025) Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species - Soqotra, Yemen. Version 2.13. Invasive Species Specialist Group ISSG. Checklist dataset. http://doi.org/10.15468/0i0w8g. Available at: https://cloud.gbif.org/griis/resource?r=yemen-soqotra-griis…. Accessed 1 March 2025.
|