Virunga National Park

Country
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Inscribed in
1979
Criteria
(vii)
(viii)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "critical" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.

Virunga National Park (covering an area of 790,000 ha) comprises an outstanding diversity of habitats, ranging from swamps and steppes to the snowfields of Rwenzori at an altitude of over 5,000 m, and from lava plains to the savannahs on the slopes of volcanoes. Mountain gorillas are found in the park, some 20,000 hippopotamuses live in the rivers and birds from Siberia spend the winter there. © UNESCO

© I. Mburanumwe

Summary

2025 Conservation Outlook

Finalised on
11 أكتوبر 2025
Critical
The status of landscape attributes relating to criteria (vii) (superlative natural phenomena) and (viii) (outstanding examples representing major stages of earth’s history) is good and is likely to remain so. However, the biological attributes relating to criterion (vii) (exceptionally large mammal biomass) are severely degraded and remain under pressure throughout much of the park. Although some recent progress is seen with increasing numbers of some of the charismatic large mammals, the management capacities to deal with the pressures are permanently overstretched (despite significant recent improvements). Possible future oil exploitation remains a significant threat since, although the government in 2019 stated that extractives are not currently a threat, it has not unequivocally confirmed that it will not undertake extractive activities within Virunga NP in the future, which under Congolese law would involve the degazettement of parts of Virunga NP. In a country racked by conflict and corruption, oil exploitation in the park is likely to fuel conflict and greatly intensify pressure on the site’s unique attributes. The trend of decline in biodiversity attributes is reversible if strong political leadership is given to support park management’s law enforcement and conservation actions. Unequivocal high-level political support for the park’s values is essential for the survival of the park into the future.

Current state and trend of VALUES

High Concern
The status of landscape attributes relating to criteria (vii) (superlative natural phenomena) and (viii) (outstanding examples representing major stages of earth’s history) is good and is likely to remain so. However, the biological attributes relating to criterion (vii) (exceptionally large mammal biomass) are severely degraded, although the situation can recover if sustained protection is applied. In recent times, there has been progress in this area with increasing numbers of some of the charismatic large mammals. The status of attributes relating to criterion (x) (significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity) is a concern because of encroachment and habitat degradation. The trend is reversible if strong political leadership is given to support park management’s law enforcement and conservation actions.

Overall THREATS

Very High Threat
Virunga National Park faces a range of significant threats, with armed militias presenting the most immediate danger through violence, illegal resource exploitation, and territorial control. Groups such as M23, Mai-Mai militias, ADF, and FDLR frequently clash with government forces, endangering park rangers and making key areas inaccessible for conservation. These armed groups rely on charcoal production, poaching, and illegal fishing to fund their operations, leading to widespread deforestation, habitat loss, and biodiversity decline. The park’s wildlife, including large mammals and fish stocks in Lake Edward, continues to suffer from unregulated hunting and overfishing, exacerbating conservation challenges. Deforestation remains a persistent issue, driven by charcoal production, illegal settlements, and agricultural expansion, all exacerbated by the displacement of large numbers of people due to civil conflict. Large sections of forest have been cleared as displaced populations turn to logging for survival, further threatening the park’s ecological balance. The potential for oil exploration in and around Virunga adds another layer of risk, with proposed drilling sites overlapping key wildlife habitats. Agricultural expansion by illegal occupants is also fragmenting ecosystems, increasing human-wildlife conflicts, and weakening the park’s ability to sustain its biodiversity. Natural threats such as volcanic activity from Mount Nyiragongo pose additional risks, periodically damaging habitats and displacing both wildlife and human populations. Disease outbreaks, including Ebola, remain a serious concern for the park’s mountain gorillas, with high mortality risks if transmission occurs. While Virunga National Park has implemented law enforcement efforts, habitat restoration initiatives, and alternative energy programs to mitigate these challenges, ongoing insecurity and resource exploitation continue to undermine long-term conservation stability.

Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT

Some Concern
In a context of continuing civil strife, insecurity, and political instability, the park faces enormous management challenges. The issues of mass encroachments, presence of armed militia, including the occupation of Rwandan-supported M23 through much of the park in 2024, commercial charcoal making, illegal fishing, and oil exploration require greater political leadership by the DRC government in support of park management. While park leadership is strong and remarkable efforts (and sacrifices) are being made to save the park’s World Heritage attributes despite the enormous challenges, the occupation of large swaths of the park, including the Mikeno sector, has severely eroded the overall protection and management of the park. The significant financial and technical support to the park from public and private partners in recent years has been critical to reducing threats and leading to several successes in terms of increasing wildlife populations, particularly in the Central Sector. However, a diplomatic resolution to the Rwandan-supported M23 rebels is needed to ensure effective protection and management. Until a resolution to this conflict is found, it is unlikely that management will be in a position to ensure overall protection of the park.

Full assessment

Click the + and - signs to expand or collapse full accounts of information under each topic. You can also view the entire list of information by clicking Expand all on the top left.

Description of values

Aesthetically spectacular afro-montane and alpine landscape of Rwenzori Mountains

Criterion
(vii)
Snow-capped peaks are located on the equator. Third third-highest peak in Africa (5,109m). Uninterrupted gradient of intact habitats from ca 800m to >5,000m within a horizontal distance of only 30 km. Largest expanse of glaciers on the African continent (World Heritage Committee, 2012).

Spectacular Virunga volcanoes with frequent volcanic activity

Criterion
(vii)
A chain of two active and six extinct volcanoes. Highest peak 4,500m. Nyamulagira and Nyragongo are two of the world’s most active volcanoes, with frequent eruptions over the past decade. They account for 2/5 of historic eruptions on the African continent. The lava is extremely fluid, which makes for visually spectacular rivers of lava during eruptions and a major tourist attraction (World Heritage Committee, 2012).

Aesthetically spectacular concentrations of large mammal fauna in the savannah plains

Criterion
(vii)
The site also contains important concentrations of wildlife, notably elephants, buffalo, and Thomas's cobs, as well as the largest concentration of hippopotamuses in Africa, with approximately 20,000 individuals living on the banks of Lake Edward and along the Rwindi, Rutshuru, and Semliki Rivers (World Heritage Committee, 2012). The hippopotamus population in the Central Sector (Rwindi plains) was the highest known density in Africa at the time of inscription (population estimated at 29,000 in 1974). The mammal biomass of the Rwindi plains in 1960 was one of the highest known (26.7 tons/km²) (Languy & De Merode, 2006) (World Heritage Committee, 2012).

Active and extinct volcanoes as a result of ongoing tectonic movements along the Albertine Rift

Criterion
(viii)
Virunga National Park is located in the centre of the Albertine Rift, of the Great Rift Valley. In the southern part of the Park, tectonic activity due to the extension of the Earth’s crust in this region has caused the emergence of the Virunga massif, comprising eight volcanoes, seven of which are located, either totally or partially, within the Park. Among them are the two most active volcanoes of Africa – Nyamuragira and nearby Nyiragongo - which, between them, are responsible for two-fifths of the historic volcanic eruptions on the African continent and which are characterized by the extreme fluidity of the alkaline lava. The activity of Nyiragongo is of world importance as a witness to volcanism of a lava lake: the bottom of its crater is in fact filled by a lake of quasi-permanent lava that empties periodically with catastrophic consequences for the local communities (World Heritage Committee, 2012).

Exceptionally high biodiversity resulting from a unique combination of uninterrupted gradient of habitat types from 680m to 5,109m and geographic location within three bio-geographic regions.

Criterion
(x)
High diversity of habitats and species results from a uniquely wide altitudinal range covered by the park (680 - 5,109m), which includes dense humid rainforest, afro-montane forest, afro-alpine forest and meadows, dry forests, savannas, lakes, rivers, swamps, and thermal sources. The park straddles three biogeographic regions: Guinea-Congolian, afro-montane, and Central African lakes. It is also located within Africa’s two largest river basins: the Congo basin and the Nile basin. Species diversity: 2,077 higher plant species, 218 mammal species (including 22 primates), and 706 bird species. In an area representing 0.3% of the surface area of DRC, the park contains over half of the country’s mammal species and two-thirds of its bird species (Languy & De Merode, 2006; UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2010). This park contains the highest vertebrate diversity of any park on the African continent (Languy & De Merode, 2006; World Heritage Committee, 2012).

Presence of several endangered and emblematic mammal species

Criterion
(x)
Mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei), Grauer’s gorilla (Gorilla beringei graueri), eastern chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii), okapi (Okapi johnstoni), elephant (Loxodonta africana) (World Heritage Committee, 2012). 13 species of mammal, 11 birds, 10 amphibians, and 6 plants are considered to be threatened. A 2010 census of the Virunga population of mountain gorillas estimated 480 individuals, of which one-third usually reside in Virunga National Park (Gray et al. 2013).

Endemic species

Criterion
(x)
Albertine endemics: 230 plants, 21 mammals (including 4 primates), 27 birds, 11 reptiles, 21 amphibians (Languy & De Merode, 2006; World Heritage Committee, 2012).

Rwenzori Mountains, uplifted from the floor of the Albertine Rift as a result of recent (<3m years) movement of tectonic plates

Criterion
(viii)
The northern sector of the park includes about 20% of the massif of Monts Rwenzori – the largest glacial region of Africa and the only true alpine mountain chain of the continent. It borders the Rwenzori Mountains National Park of Uganda, also inscribed as World Heritage, with which it shares the ‘Pic Marguerite’, third highest summit of Africa (5,109 m).
Important wetland areas for overwintering Palearctic bird species, and fishing for local communities.
Lake Edward, and the rivers flowing into and out of it, are important wetland habitats for migrating bird species.
Lake Edward has a high potential for fish production (estimated at 15,000 – 16,000 tons/year in 1989 (Vakily, 1989)) and is a vital resource for local populations. Fishing rights for local communities, regulated by a cooperative (COOPEVI), were preserved when the park was created (but COOPEVI is no longer functioning) (Draft Plan d’Aménagement et de Gestion du Parc National des Virunga, 2011-2015).

Assessment information

Very High Threat
Decades of poor governance culminating in two civil wars and the ongoing civil unrest are the factors that have created the current threats: encroachment for agriculture and fishing, commercial hunting, and deforestation for charcoal. The cumulative effect of these threats is resulting in intense pressures on many of the park’s World Heritage attributes: Diversity and ecological connectivity of terrestrial habitats (particularly Sclerophyllous forests, woodlands, wooded savannah and humid rainforest); Endangered and/or threatened species (2 subspecies of gorilla, chimpanzees, l’Hoest's monkey, okapi, Ruwenzori duiker, elephant); Large mammal assemblages of the central plains; Wetland habitats for Palaearctic migrants. Overfishing on Lake Edward also threatens the biological diversity of the aquatic ecosystem and threatens food security of local populations. Although there have in recent times (2014–2017) been some improvements (3 years consistent progress in the reclamation of some of the park, end of M23 rebel group threat, construction of hydro power stations (which potentially reduces the need for charcoal, and provide financial sustainability for park protection), greater collaboration between the DRC military and park rangers contributing to the removal of armed groups from the centre of the park), change in mandate of MONUSCO to take on armed groups in the east of the country and increases in numbers of some of the large charismatic mammals, plus the creation of Virunga Alliance and good financial stability) to some of these threats mentioned, they all still exist and any gains made can very quickly be reversed because of the overall poor governance of the country.
Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Overfishing)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Overfishing poses a serious threat to Virunga National Park, jeopardizing the ecological balance of Lake Edward, the livelihoods of local fishermen, and the stability of the region (Verweijen, J. et. al 2020). The lake, which lies within the park, has experienced a decline in fish populations due to excessive fishing pressure. Reports indicate that production has dropped from 15,000 tons to less than 400 tons per year, a direct result of the uncontrolled expansion of fishing efforts (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). The number of boats on the lake has increased by over 300%, far exceeding sustainable levels (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). This depletion threatens key species such as Nile tilapia and catfish, which play crucial roles in maintaining the lake’s ecosystem (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024).

The situation is worsened by widespread illegal fishing practices and corruption. Many fishermen use small-mesh nets, electro-fishing, and even mosquito nets originally intended for malaria prevention (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). These methods capture juvenile fish before they can reproduce, further diminishing fish stocks (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). The lack of effective regulation of fishing has allowed these destructive practices to persist, making it difficult to implement sustainable fisheries management (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024).

Beyond environmental damage, overfishing is entangled with the broader security crisis in eastern Congo. Armed groups such as the Mai-Mai and the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) have turned the fishing industry into a lucrative revenue stream (Virunga-GWC Annex VI Report, 2023). These militias impose illegal taxes on fishermen, often demanding up to half of their catch in exchange for access to fishing areas (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). In some cases, armed groups regulate entry to the lake entirely, forcing fishermen to navigate not only dwindling resources but also life-threatening security risks (Verweijen, J. et. al. 2020). The revenue generated from these activities helps finance militia operations, contributing to a cycle of violence in the region (Virunga-GWC Annex VI Report, 2023).

The socioeconomic impact of overfishing is severe. Many fishermen have been forced to abandon their trade due to declining catches and increasing insecurity, leading to widespread unemployment and economic hardship (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). For many local families, fish is a primary source of protein, yet malnutrition is on the rise as fish prices increase and availability dwindles (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). Women and children, in particular, are disproportionately affected, as they rely heavily on fish markets for sustenance and income (Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. 2024). The economic strain exacerbates tensions between local communities and park authorities, further complicating conservation efforts (Virunga-GWC Annex VI Report, 2023).

Virunga National Park is facing ecological consequences from this crisis. The decline of fish populations disrupts the lake’s food web, affecting not just fish species but also aquatic birds, hippos, and other wildlife dependent on Lake Edward’s ecosystem (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI Report, 2024). As fishing pressures push fishermen to find other livelihoods, other forms of environmental degradation, such as deforestation for charcoal production, are also on the rise (2024 Annual Performance Report to USAID). The park’s ability to maintain its biodiversity is increasingly at risk as human activities intensify around its boundaries (418108 Virunga-GWC Annex VI Report, 2023).
Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees
(Deforestation for charcoal making)
High Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Deforestation for charcoal production poses a significant threat to Virunga National Park, driven by a combination of conflict, displacement, and economic instability. Virunga lost 964 hectares (2,382 acres) of forest over just four months, with 20% of this loss occurring near informal refugee settlements (Mongabey News 2023). Rangers have observed animals, including chimpanzees, migrating to unaffected parts of the park in response to deforestation, indicating serious disruption to their habitat (Nyirabihogo, N. 2023).

Satellite monitoring has shown that deforestation in Virunga has reached unprecedented levels, largely due to the exploitation of forests for charcoal production (Erickson-Davis, M. 2021). This degradation not only eliminates critical habitat for wildlife but also accelerates soil erosion, reduces carbon sequestration, and contributes to climate change.

Charcoal is the primary fuel source for millions of people in eastern DRC. With over 97% of the 6 million people living around Virunga relying on wood or charcoal for energy, the demand for fuelwood is high (Cibemba, A., & Baruka, G. 2023). This demand has led to the rise of an illegal charcoal economy controlled by armed groups. Militias such as the Mai-Mai and the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) have turned charcoal production into a key revenue stream, taxing production and transport while forcibly controlling access to forested areas (Cibemba, A., & Baruka, G. (2023).

The ongoing conflict between the Congolese government and M23 rebels has displaced over 1.7 million people since 2021, pushing many into Virunga National Park (Reuters 2024). Many of these displaced individuals have turned to logging and charcoal production for survival, as humanitarian aid remains scarce. Deforestation in Virunga has worsened as displaced people cut down trees for shelter, fuel, and income (Nyirabihogo, N. 2023).

Virunga National Park authorities and conservation organizations have attempted to combat deforestation through alternative energy solutions, stricter law enforcement, and community engagement programs. USAID has supported initiatives to promote liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as a cleaner alternative to charcoal, reducing reliance on illegal logging (Cibemba, A., & Baruka, G. 2023). However, these efforts are hindered by insecurity and the widespread control of the charcoal trade by armed groups.
Virunga National Park’s hydroelectric power initiatives provide a sustainable alternative to charcoal. The park’s hydroelectric plants, including the Matebe and Lubero stations, generate renewable energy that supplies electricity to thousands of households and businesses in the surrounding communities. By offering an affordable and accessible power source, these projects decrease reliance on charcoal, which has been a primary driver of deforestation in Virunga due to the high demand for fuelwood. However, by themselves, they have not been sufficient to eliminate insecurity and demand for charcoal.
Conflict, Civil Unrest & Security Activities
(Presence of armed militia (war/civil unrest))
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Civil conflict and armed militias pose a severe threat to Virunga National Park due to the interplay of violence, environmental destruction, economic destabilization, and human displacement. The presence of armed groups such as M23, Mai-Mai militias, Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), and the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) has significantly impacted conservation efforts, local communities, and the park’s biodiversity.

One of the most immediate threats comes from direct violence. Armed militias frequently engage in clashes with government forces in and around the park, putting rangers, local communities, and wildlife at great risk. In 2023 alone, 14 park staff members were killed due to the ongoing M23 rebellion and escalating violence from FDLR and Mai-Mai factions (Virunga-Rewild Annex VI Report, 2024). The targeting of rangers severely hampers conservation efforts, as they are the frontline defenders of Virunga’s biodiversity. Many areas of the park remain inaccessible due to militia control, making it difficult to monitor or protect key wildlife species such as mountain gorillas (2024 Annual Performance Report to USAID).

Beyond direct violence, armed militias exploit Virunga’s natural resources to fund their operations. The illegal charcoal trade, valued at over $170 million annually, is a primary source of revenue for these groups (Einhorn, G., & de Merode, E. 2024). The FDLR, in particular, has turned charcoal production into a significant illicit business, leading to extensive deforestation and habitat destruction (Rugiririza, E., & Sengenya, C. 2020). Reports indicate that vast areas within the park have been deforested due to both armed conflict and the increasing demand for wood by displaced communities and local populations affected by instability (Reuters, 2024).

The environmental impact extends to poaching and overfishing. Armed groups poach large mammals, including elephants and hippos, for bushmeat, while also exploiting fish stocks from Lake Edward, often using destructive fishing methods (Rugiririza, E., & Sengenya, C. 2020). With many park rangers unable to patrol due to security risks, illegal wildlife killings have increased, further endangering already vulnerable species such as the mountain gorilla and African elephant (Virunga National Park n.d.).

Virunga National Park has the potential to be a key driver of ecotourism, attracting thousands of visitors annually. However, conflict and security concerns have led to prolonged closures, drastically reducing park revenues and depriving local communities of income-generating opportunities (Pierret, C. 2024). The decline in tourism revenue directly affects conservation activities, which are supported by visitor fees for park maintenance and anti-poaching initiatives.

Human displacement is another major consequence of the conflict. Fighting between militias and government forces has led to mass displacements, with over 1.7 million people forced to flee their homes (Reuters, 2024). Many displaced populations settle near or within the park, increasing human-wildlife conflicts and placing additional pressure on the ecosystem for resources such as firewood, land for agriculture, and water (Virunga-Rewild Annex VI Report, 2024). Additionally, displaced communities are often forced into illegal activities, such as poaching and logging, to survive.

The geopolitical implications of the conflict exacerbate the instability. The involvement of neighboring Rwanda in supporting M23 rebels has intensified hostilities, further complicating conservation and governance efforts (The Guardian, 2024). Reports suggest that the conflict is not just about territorial control but also about access to valuable minerals and natural resources in Virunga, which adds another layer of complexity to the crisis (The Guardian, 2024).
Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops
(Habitat loss from agricultural activities associated with illegal encroachment)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Subsistence agriculture around illegal occupations inside the park is a high threat to the park’s values. 67% of the park boundary is under moderate or high pressure. In October 2010, an estimated 37,182 ha of the park were illegally occupied (State Party of the DRC, 2016). The park is long and narrow (300km long, average width 25km with a minimum of 2.5km, 1150km of boundary), so encroachment threatens the connectivity between the uniquely diverse range of habitat types within the park. The integrity of the park is thus directly threatened. Deforestation and hunting are also associated with illegal encroachment. Deforestation in the southern and northern sectors also threatens the survival of certain endangered or endemic forest species (e.g, chimpanzee, l’Hoest’s monkey, and okapi). Hunting associated with illegal settlements has greatly reduced the exceptional mammal biomass of the Rwindi plains. The main areas affected by illegal occupations are: Southern Sector: Kirolirwe, Mugunga, and Nzulo. 12,500 ha of mid-altitude natural forest have been lost in Kirolirwe. Central Sector: Ndwali, the west shore of Lake Edward, and along the eastern border at Nyamilima. Encroachment along the west shore interrupts the ecological connectivity of terrestrial habitats between the south and the north of the park. Northern Sector: Lubilya, Djuma, Nyaleke. Deforestation in the Djuma sector threatens the dense humid rainforests of the Semiliki valley, where chimpanzees and okapi are found. Encroachment around Tshiaberimu mountain threatens the small population of Grauer’s gorillas, currently numbering only five individuals (Sikubabwo, 2015). From 2003 to 2015, ICCN recovered 25,788 ha. In 2016, 280 FARDC soldiers under the command of ICCN patrolled parts of Virunga NP, especially along Route 2 that crosses the park in the Central Sector and the Northern Sector, to protect civilian travellers from attack by armed groups. These were referred to as Sekolo I & II operations and are ongoing (State Party of the DRC, 2017). They have achieved some success in diminishing armed group activities in the park. In 2019, approximately one-fifth of Virunga NP (i.e., an estimated 18.5% of the Park's surface area (ca 1,000 km²)) remains under illegal occupation, corresponding to areas of cultivation and charcoal production. This shows a significant improvement since 2010, and a slight improvement compared to recent levels of 21% in 2017 and 19.4% in 2018. A consultation strategy with local communities is being implemented, where the Park is working through its Virunga Alliance development programmes based on tourism, hydropower & business support, agriculture & fishing, and the construction of electric fences (State Party of the DRC, 2020).
Geological Events
(Volcanic eruptions)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Volcanic activity remains an ongoing threat to Virunga National Park, with recent eruptions continuing to impact both the park’s ecosystems and surrounding communities. The eruption of Mount Nyiragongo in May 2021 demonstrated the severe risks posed by the region’s active volcanoes, resulting in widespread displacement of local communities, destruction of infrastructure, and loss of forest habitats within the park.

Relatively extensive areas of Sclerophyllous forests (forêts sclérophylles) are lost each time there is a lava flow. Since so much of these forests has already been degraded by illegal charcoal exploitation, the loss of even a small area of intact forest is a major concern with respect to the integrity of the park and the loss of chimpanzee and L’Hoest's monkey habitat. The volcanic activity also threatens communities living in the vicinity. Much of Goma town was destroyed by a lava flow in 2002. As this is a geological event, it is impossible to influence its occurrence or impact. However, it should be noted that eruptions can be an important source of tourism revenue. Areas of varying size of intact forests (tens to hundreds of hectares, depending on the direction of the lava flow) are lost each time there is a lava flow. Since so much of the natural forests have already been degraded by illegal charcoal exploitation, the loss of even a small area of intact forest is a major concern with respect to the integrity of the park and the loss of chimpanzee and L’Hoest's monkey habitat. The volcanic activity also threatens communities living in the vicinity.
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals
(Commercial hunting of large mammals)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
The ongoing efforts to mitigate commercial hunting in Virunga National Park have resulted in measurable progress, despite significant challenges posed by ongoing armed conflict and regional instability. Security threats, including the resurgence of M23 rebels and incursions by Mai Mai and FDLR militia groups, have created severe obstacles to conservation efforts and, in some cases, facilitated hunting within the park. However, despite these challenges, the implementation of anti-poaching measures has led to notable improvements in flagship species populations, particularly elephants, hippos, and lions (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2024).
The elephant population has increased from 423 in 2020 to 544 in 2023, with continued protection measures aiming to reach 800 by 2024 (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2024). Hippo numbers are estimated at 1,400, reflecting a modest but encouraging increase of 100 individuals since the last assessment (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2024). Active monitoring of lions has confirmed the presence of 11 individuals across three prides, with satellite collars enabling more effective tracking and conservation (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2024). The population of mountain gorillas in 2024 is estimated at 240, with no recorded deaths due to poaching in the past year, despite restricted access to the Mikeno Sector due to rebel control (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2024)..
Efforts to mitigate human-wildlife conflict have also contributed to conservation progress. The installation of 155 kilometers of electric fencing has helped limit human encroachment and reduce wildlife poaching by armed groups (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2024). Community trackers have played a critical role in preventing human-wildlife conflict by monitoring gorilla movements outside the park and sensitizing local populations, ensuring that no retaliatory killings occurred.
The successful transfer in 2024 of four sanctuary female Grauer gorillas reinforced the existing population of 7 at Mount Tshiaberimu, bringing the total to 11 within Virunga National Park. Increased patrolling and partnerships between the park and GRACE, Gorilla Doctors, Re: wild, and many other experts contributed to making the reinforcement successful.
Pathogens
(Ebola and other diseases potentially impacting great ape populations)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Ebola and other disease outbreaks pose a significant threat to Virunga National Park due to a combination of ecological, biological, and socio-political factors.
Mountain gorillas, which are a key species in Virunga National Park, are highly susceptible to the Ebola virus. Previous studies on Ebola’s impact on great apes have demonstrated mortality rates of up to 98%, with the virus reducing the global gorilla population by approximately one-third (Zimmerman et al., 2023). Simulation models predict that an Ebola outbreak among Virunga’s mountain gorilla population could be catastrophic, leading to a rapid spread of the virus within gorilla groups and high mortality rates. Ebola can spread among gorilla groups through direct contact and environmental contamination, such as through body fluids, carcasses, or shared feeding sites (Zimmerman et al., 2023).
The Virunga Massif, home to a large proportion of the world’s remaining mountain gorillas, is surrounded by dense human populations (up to 1,000 people per square kilometer) (Zimmerman et al., 2023). Due to this proximity, disease spillover from humans to gorillas is a major concern. Ebola outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have historically been linked to human-wildlife interactions, and human activity within and around Virunga increases the risk of transmission (Zimmerman et al., 2023). Habituated gorillas, which are accustomed to human presence due to conservation and tourism efforts, are particularly at risk because they are more likely to come into close contact with humans (National Geographic 2019).
Once introduced, Ebola spreads rapidly in gorilla populations. Even with vaccination efforts, no modeled intervention completely prevented widespread infection (Zimmerman et al., 2023). The only way to achieve a survival rate above 50% in case of an outbreak would be to vaccinate at least half of the habituated gorillas within three weeks of the first detected infection. However, given the region’s security challenges, deploying such a rapid response would be extremely difficult (Zimmerman et al., 2023). Controlling Ebola in Virunga is further complicated by armed conflicts, limiting access for conservationists and medical teams to implement disease monitoring and response measures (Virunga-Rewild Annex VI, 2024).
An Ebola outbreak could severely impact conservation efforts, reversing decades of progress in protecting Virunga’s mountain gorillas and other wildlife (National Geographic 2019). The park has great potential to benefit from ecotourism, which would contribute to conservation funding and support local communities. Disease outbreaks, such as Ebola and COVID-19, have previously led to prolonged park closures, resulting in financial losses and increased pressures on wildlife from poaching and habitat destruction (Neiman, S., 2020).
Ebola poses an existential threat to Virunga National Park due to the high susceptibility of mountain gorillas, the likelihood of human-wildlife transmission, the challenges of rapid outbreak response, and the broader socio-economic consequences of disease outbreaks.
Very High Threat
Possible future oil exploitation is the greatest threat to the site as it would require degazettement of parts of the park where oil exploitation would take place. In a country racked by conflict and corruption, oil exploitation in the park is likely to fuel conflict and intensify pressure on the site’s unique attributes, and is considered by the World Heritage Committee to be incompatible with World Heritage status. Although the DRC government in 2019 states that extractives are not currently a threat to the site since this is not on the government agenda, it has not announced any long term intentions regarding drilling for oil in Virunga NP or other World Heritage sites, so there is a significant potential threat for this to become active again in future. The potential threat from Uganda relating to the Ngaji block, which borders Virunga NP on the Ugandan side of Lake Edward also remains a concern.
Oil & Gas exploration/development
(Oil exploration)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
In 2007, 85 percent of Virunga National Park was allocated as oil concessions by the DRC government. Acceptance of oil exploitation in the park will create a very dangerous precedent which will require degazettement of part, or all, of the park since mining and oil exploitation in national parks are specifically proscribed by law. It will also strengthen the hand of a minority of powerful local politicians who are lobbying for degazettement of the park for purely political and economic reasons. Oil spills in the closed aquatic ecosystem of the park could have catastrophic consequences for aquatic resources in the lake on which at least 3 million local people depend. Most of Virunga National Park is covered by 3 oil prospection blocks (Blocks III, IV, and V). Bloc III had been assigned to French oil company TOTAL S.A which committed not to enter current boundaries of the park in May 2013, nevertheless TOTAL pursued activities in close proximity of the park (north part of Block III) in the watershed of the Semiliki river; periphery activity could impact the park itself, before withdrawing from Block III since 2018. In 2010, Block V was attributed to SOCO International/ Dominion Oil / Cohydro for exploration. After a public outcry and pressure from international agencies, the exploration permit was suspended pending a Strategic Environmental Assessment supported by the EU. In June 2014, under intense pressure from UNESCO and many conservation organisations, SOCO announced it was stopping all activities in Virunga National Park unless the DRC government and UNESCO agreed that these activities can be compatible with World Heritage status. It should be noted that SOCO had completed its seismic activities by this time. According to the SOCO annual report 2015 “Following the end of our contractual obligations to the Government of the DRC, SOCO did not seek to renew the Block V licence. In 2015, SOCO finalised its relinquishment of the licence. This is in accordance with its public commitments made in 2014. The closure of the SOCO office in Kinshasa was completed by the end of the year. SOCO holds no licence interests in the DRC.” (SOCO 2015). There has been no confirmation from the DRC government on whether they have cancelled oil exploration licenses for Virunga NP (SOC, 2017).

The World Heritage Committee has repeatedly expressed its concern regarding the existance of oil concessions in Virunga National Park and requested the DRC government to not issue any more exploration permits for Virunga NP (UNESCO, 2017; 2018; 2019). In 2020, the government reported that, for the time being, petroleum exploration does not represent a threat to the Outstanding Universal Value of Virunga (and Salonga) National Park since there is no exploration and exploitation activity, and such activities are no longer on the agenda (State Party of the DRC, 2020).

Potential threats from oil exploration remain, including in neighbouring Uganda where in May 2019, the minister of Energy and Mineral Development announced a second licensing open bidding of five oil blocks to further Uganda’s commercial interests in oil production, including the Ngaji block located in Queen Elizabeth NP which borders the DRC along Virunga NP and covers Lake Edward which is jointly split between DRC and Uganda (Save Virunga, 2020). This potential threat remains, with the agreement in April 2016 to construct an oil pipeline from Uganda to the coast of Tanzania. Over 60 DRC, Ugandan and International NGOs, along with UNESCO, signed a joint declaration to the Ugandan and DRC governments to prevent any exploration, extraction or related activities in the wider Virunga area.
Changes in Temperature Regimes
(Melting glaciers due to climate change)
High Threat
Outside site
Recent studies indicate that the glaciers of the Rwenzori Mountains, which constitute part of the aesthetically spectacular alpine landscape have been receding (600ha in 1906 to 200 ha in 2005) (Languy De Merode, 2006) and that these have almost completely disappeared (Bosson et al., 2019). Climate change therefore is a high threat to these glaciers.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Some Concern
The relationship between Virunga National Park and the local communities that surround it is a complex one, shaped by a mix of conservation efforts, security challenges, and economic struggles. Over five million people live within a day’s walk of the park’s boundaries, many of whom rely on its natural resources for their survival (Rewild Report, 2024).
The presence of armed groups such as M23, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), and various Mai Mai factions has further complicated the relationship between the park and local communities. These groups have not only contributed to ongoing violence but have also exploited Virunga’s natural resources for financial gain.
Since 2020, Virunga has expanded community engagement initiatives, including participatory boundary demarcation and alternative livelihood programs such as sustainable fisheries management(Re:wild, 2024). Economic development initiatives have been introduced in an attempt to offer alternative livelihoods that reduce reliance on illegal resource extraction. Renewable energy projects, such as the expansion of hydroelectric power plants, have provided electricity to local communities, supporting small businesses and reducing the dependence on charcoal production (USAID Annual Report, 2024). Programs such as the e-cooker initiative, supported by USAID, have further aimed to reduce the use of firewood and charcoal by providing cleaner, more sustainable cooking alternatives. Additionally, Virunga’s Entrepreneur Training Program has helped young people develop skills and find employment opportunities outside of conservation-restricted areas (USAID Annual Report, 2024). However, the ongoing presence of armed groups, along with political instability, continues to strain efforts to build cooperative relationships between the park and local populations.
These initiatives have led to the establishment of cooperative economic programs that create sustainable income sources for local populations. The Rwanguba hydroelectric plant, completed in 2024, now supplies electricity to surrounding communities, reducing charcoal dependence and providing economic opportunities (USAID, 2024). Despite these efforts, unresolved land disputes have contributed to tensions, and greater efforts are needed to develop conflict mitigation strategies and improve transparency in decision-making (UNESCO, 2024).
Legal framework
Serious Concern
The co-management agreement between ICCN and the Virunga Foundation remains in effect until 2040, providing legal clarity and structured governance (UNESCO, 2024). Legal frameworks have been expanded to include stricter anti-poaching laws and improved judicial cooperation to prosecute offenders. However, enforcement remains challenging due to political instability and the presence of armed groups, limiting the effectiveness of legal mechanisms. The continued existence of three oil blocks within the park remains a major long-term threat, as ongoing lobbying efforts for oil exploration risk undermining conservation progress (Re: wild, 2024).
Governance arrangements
Mostly Effective
Virunga National Park is governed by the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN), which holds the legal mandate for conservation and law enforcement, supported by partnerships with state security forces, local authorities, and international organizations such as the Virunga Foundation (UNESCO, 2024). The Virunga Alliance, a multi-stakeholder initiative, integrates conservation with community development and economic programs, ensuring that governance remains legitimate and functional (USAID, 2024). Stakeholder involvement is emphasized through participatory demarcation processes, engaging local leaders, community representatives, and customary authorities to define boundaries and resolve disputes (2024 Annual Performance Report, p. 7). The governance framework includes public scrutiny mechanisms, such as grievance reporting systems, regular stakeholder consultations, and media outreach, ensuring transparency and accountability (USAID, 2024).
Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, with ICCN managing conservation and law enforcement, supported by FARDC and the Congolese National Police (PNC) in combating poaching and armed militia activities (UNESCO, 2024). The Virunga Foundation oversees park operations, including security patrols, tourism, and sustainable energy projects, while community-based groups contribute through wildlife monitoring and boundary enforcement (USAID, 2024). The park utilizes modern monitoring systems, such as the LoRaWAN alert system, for real-time tracking of security threats and conservation progress, complemented by community radio programs, educational workshops, and grievance mechanisms to enhance public access to information (USAID, 2024). Outreach efforts include training for journalists and youth organizations, with over 750 grievances addressed in the last reporting period, reflecting a commitment to community engagement and dispute resolution (USAID, 2024).
Adaptive management is central to governance, allowing conservation strategies to evolve based on threat assessments, security conditions, and ecological monitoring (USAID, 2024). A dedicated Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) team employs camera traps, GPS tracking, and aerial surveys to inform decision-making, ensuring an evidence-based approach to conservation (Re: wild, 2024). Security measures have adapted to ongoing threats, with temporary operational bases and joint patrols implemented to protect critical park areas (UNESCO, 2024). Despite persistent security challenges, the park’s governance framework maintains a balance between conservation, security, and community engagement, making it a model of adaptive and inclusive protected area management (UNESCO, 2024).
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Some Concern
Virunga remains a key site under the Greater Virunga Transboundary Collaboration, with continued partnerships between DRC, Uganda, and Rwanda to protect mountain gorillas and shared wildlife (UNESCO, 2024). Improved data-sharing protocols between conservation agencies have enhanced coordinated protection efforts. Furthermore, increased diplomatic efforts have focused on creating a unified conservation strategy that extends beyond political borders. However, regional political tensions have occasionally hindered conservation efforts, requiring ongoing dialogue and conflict resolution measures (Re:wild, 2024).
Boundaries
Serious Concern
The park’s boundaries have been under increasing pressure due to illegal settlement, agricultural expansion, and security concerns linked to armed groups (UNESCO, 2024). Since 2022, the areas affected by human activities within the park have grown from 859.6 km² in June 2022 to 978.1 km² in March 2024, representing an increase of 14.2% of the park’s total area (UNESCO, 2024). Agricultural land use has seen the most significant expansion, reaching 692.3 km² in 2024, highlighting an intensification of farming activities in areas that are difficult to control due to ongoing conflict (UNESCO, 2024).
To address these challenges, the park has engaged in participatory boundary demarcation, a process that involves collaboration with local authorities and communities to clarify park limits and reduce disputes (UNESCO, 2024). One of the most notable efforts has been the boundary demarcation in Kasindi–Lubiliha, where 550 hectares of illegally occupied land were reclaimed in 2024 (UNESCO, 2024). The installation of an electric fence in this area has helped prevent further invasions, and wildlife such as elephants have begun returning to the protected zones (UNESCO, 2024). Another significant area of focus has been Mahimbi, where local customary leaders have played a crucial role in fostering awareness and respect for the park’s boundaries (UNESCO, 2024). Through community consultations and direct engagement, tensions have been reduced in this region, leading to an 8 km extension of clearly demarcated boundaries in late 2024 (UNESCO, 2024).
Despite these successes, armed groups continue to pose a significant challenge to boundary enforcement (Re:wild, 2024). The ongoing conflict with M23 rebels has made access to certain strategic areas difficult, preventing full demarcation and restoration efforts (Re:wild, 2024). In regions such as Nzulo, illegal land sales and fraudulent land claims have further complicated efforts to secure the park’s boundaries (UNESCO, 2024). Although a legal victory in March 2023 upheld the park’s claim to the Nzulo region, enforcing this ruling remains difficult due to instability and local political resistance (UNESCO, 2024).
Additionally, displacement from humanitarian crises has led to the establishment of informal camps near park boundaries, particularly around the Nyamulagira and Nyiragongo volcanoes (UNESCO, 2024). These camps place additional strain on the park’s natural resources, as residents rely on firewood collection and small-scale agriculture to survive (UNESCO, 2024). To further reinforce boundary protection, Virunga National Park has invested in technological surveillance, including optical fiber-based monitoring, CCTV, and breach detection sensors (Re:wild, 2024). These tools provide real-time alerts on potential encroachments, strengthening the park’s ability to respond to illegal activities quickly (Re:wild, 2024).
In the long term, the success of Virunga’s boundary demarcation efforts depends on a combination of legal enforcement, community cooperation, and security stabilization (USAID, 2024). While some progress has been made, the park continues to face land disputes and ongoing security threats that complicate conservation efforts (UNESCO, 2024). Plans include further expansion of fencing projects, increased community engagement programs, and closer coordination with national security forces to protect the integrity of Virunga’s borders (USAID, 2024).
Overlapping international designations
Mostly Effective
The World Heritage site completely overlaps with the Ramsar site Parc national des Virunga (1996). The management authority of the World Heritage property regularly communicates with the Ramsar focal point(s) and the Ramsar site's wetlands and Lake Edouard appear to be managed in accordance with the Convention and the guidelines of the Plan d’Aménagement et de Gestion (PAG) (State Party of the Republic of Congo, 2021).
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Mostly Effective
The implementation of committee recommendations has improved at the park level, with increased surveillance, community revenue-sharing programs, and the promotion of alternative energy sources (UNESCO, 2024). New governance structures have been established to ensure more accountability in implementing conservation strategies. However, government-level interventions such as the eviction of illegal occupants and disarmament of militias remain largely unaddressed, necessitating stronger policy enforcement (USAID, 2024).
Climate action
Highly Effective
Virunga National Park has incorporated climate action within its management framework, particularly through mitigation and adaptation strategies that address deforestation, energy sustainability, and biodiversity conservation. The park has initiated reforestation programs and alternative energy solutions, such as hydropower projects, to reduce reliance on charcoal and mitigate deforestation impacts (USAID, 2024). The CLiMA VIRUNGA reforestation initiative aims to restore degraded ecosystems by planting native species, providing carbon sequestration benefits while simultaneously improving local livelihoods (USAID, 2024) . Despite these efforts, the increasing illegal logging and resource exploitation by armed groups poses significant challenges to long-term climate resilience in the park (USAID, 2024).
Management plan and overall management system
Mostly Effective
As of 2024, Virunga National Park’s management system has been strengthened with the implementation of an updated Plan d’Aménagement et de Gestion (PAG), officially validated by ICCN in 2024 (UNESCO, 2024). This updated plan includes a refined zoning strategy, increasing the efficiency of patrols and monitoring programs within the park. The plan also provides a framework for integrating conservation and sustainable development efforts, ensuring that local communities benefit from conservation activities. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) agreement between ICCN and the Virunga Foundation continues to guide conservation efforts, ensuring financial sustainability and structured governance (UNESCO, 2024).
Law enforcement
Serious Concern
The presence of armed groups hinders effective law enforcement, particularly in the southern sectors controlled by M23. Armed groups such as the ADF, M23, and FDLR continue to exploit park resources, particularly through illegal charcoal production, which generates $35–40 million annually (UNESCO, 2024). However, security efforts have been reinforced with military support from the Congolese army (FARDC), leading to some successful reclaiming of park areas from illegal activities(USAID, 2024). Advanced surveillance equipment, such as drone technology, has been introduced to enhance monitoring efforts. However, violent attacks on rangers continue to pose serious challenges, affecting morale and leading to loss of personnel (Re:wild, 2024).
Despite the challenges brought by armed groups, the park has reinforced legal frameworks by intensifying arrests and prosecutions of individuals engaged in illegal activities, such as poaching, fishing, agriculture, and charcoal production (UNESCO 2024). Increased community involvement has led to reductions in poaching (UNESCO, 2024). Monthly land patrols focus on areas under direct threat from poachers and illegal settlers. In 2024, 3,001 traps were neutralized, including dismantled, destroyed, and burned traps (UNESCO 2024). A total of 1,670 arrests were made in 2024, with illegal fishing (53%) and agricultural encroachments (23%) being the most common violations. 107 convictions were recorded, with illegal fishing accounting for over half of them (UNESCO, 2024). Despite tensions between the DRC and Rwanda, the park continues to collaborate with Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) under the Greater Virunga Transboundary Collaboration (GVTC) (UNESCO, 2024).
Conflict has also led to the mass displacement of civilians, who often settle near the park, increasing deforestation and land encroachments. Over 300 hectares of forest have been lost around the Nyiragongo and Nyamulagira volcanoes due to illegal settlements. Camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs) near park boundaries, such as in Kanyaruchinya and Bulengo, have exacerbated pressures on Virunga’s resources (UNESCO, 2024).
Sustainable finance
Mostly Effective
The park’s financial model relies on a combination of international donor funding, revenue from hydroelectric power generation, tourism, and sustainable agriculture. The Virunga Energies project has been particularly instrumental, operating hydroelectric plants that provide electricity to local communities while generating revenue for conservation programs (USAID, 2024). Additionally, the Virunga Alliance promotes an integrated approach to sustainable finance, leveraging investments in eco-tourism, renewable energy, and agricultural production to create alternative livelihoods and reduce pressure on park resources (UNESCO, 2024). Despite ongoing security challenges that have disrupted tourism activities, limited operations on Tchegera Island have still contributed to park revenue, demonstrating the resilience of nature-based economic initiatives (Re:wild, 2024). Furthermore, international support, including USAID funding, continues to play a vital role, with allocated budgets ensuring infrastructure improvements, staff training, and expanded conservation efforts. Moving forward, the park aims to diversify its financial streams further, ensuring economic sustainability while preserving Virunga’s critical ecosystems (USAID, 2024).
Staff capacity, training and development
Highly Effective
Virunga National Park has prioritized staff capacity building, training, and development to strengthen its conservation efforts and ensure that rangers and personnel are well-equipped to handle the park’s complex challenges. In 2024, the park continued its multidisciplinary training program, which includes theoretical, physical, and psychological assessments, as well as specialized training in legal frameworks, human rights, leadership, and conflict resolution. Rangers also receive tactical instruction, first aid training, and ethics courses delivered by civilian and former military experts (USAID, 2024). Since 2009, ranger training has remained a core focus, adapting regularly to the evolving security threats within and around the park. The park collaborates with organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross to ensure compliance with human rights standards and has introduced a whistleblower system and grievance mechanism to uphold ethical practices (UNESCO, 2024). In 2024, a new “Aidman” initiative was launched, embedding a health specialist within each platoon of 25 rangers, enabling them to handle medical emergencies in the field while reinforcing ethical standards (Re:wild, 2024). Furthermore, new ranger recruitment in September 2024 included a dedicated module on human rights, reinforcing ICCN’s commitment to ethical and professional law enforcement (USAID, 2024). Through these continuous training efforts, Virunga National Park ensures that its staff is not only equipped for operational effectiveness but also trained to engage responsibly with local communities and conservation ethics.
Education and interpretation programmes
Some Concern
Virunga National Park has expanded its education and interpretation programs, with a focus on fostering conservation awareness among local youth and communities. In 2024, the park launched the “Echo du PNVi” campaign, which was implemented in ten schools across Beni between February and May. This initiative reached approximately 7,000 students and culminated in an inter-school environmental knowledge competition, where the two finalist schools were awarded an immersive two-day excursion to the Ishango site, providing firsthand exposure to Virunga’s biodiversity (USAID, 2024). Beyond school-based programs, the park extended its outreach to Catholic parishes in Goma, where 200 participants engaged in conservation awareness sessions (USAID, 2024). Additionally, in October 2023, Virunga hosted a mass awareness event at the Kanyaruchinya displaced persons camp, using participatory theater and public debates to highlight the detrimental impacts of deforestation on both communities and ecosystems (USAID, 2024).
Educational tools have also been developed to make conservation more accessible to young audiences. One such initiative is the “Ecolier Ecolo” comic book, which introduces children to environmental issues in a fun and engaging format (USAID, 2024). Meanwhile, the Espace Virunga Environmental Education Center in Beni has continued to serve as a hub for environmental education, hosting film screenings that reached approximately 300 young people in 2024 (USAID, 2024). To further amplify its educational efforts, the park has also leveraged radio programming, producing 38 broadcasts between October 2023 and September 2024 in collaboration with 15 community radio stations. These broadcasts have been particularly effective in conflict-affected regions where in-person educational initiatives remain challenging (USAID, 2024). Looking ahead, Virunga National Park plans to expand its education programs into more rural areas, strengthen partnerships with universities, and enhance its conservation outreach through social media-based awareness campaigns (USAID, 2024).
Tourism and visitation management
Some Concern
Security concerns have significantly impacted tourism initiatives. Mountain gorilla tourism has been suspended due to the presence of armed militia, M23, in the Mikeno sector of the park. Additionally, the construction of a new lodge in Lulimbi was halted due to the advance of M23 rebel forces, making the site inaccessible (UNESCO, 2024). The instability in the area has further delayed plans to operationalize this infrastructure. However, another tourism site is Tchegera Island, which recorded 4,500 visitors and 251 overnight stays by September 2023 (UNESCO, 2024). The island offers an immersive experience in the park’s wilderness, showcasing the potential of eco-tourism even in a conflict-prone region.
In 2024, the Virunga Foundation reported tourism revenue of just $106,114, which came exclusively from Tchegera Island, as all other park tourism activities remained suspended due to insecurity (USAID, 2024). Moving forward, the park aims to revitalize tourism infrastructure and expand offerings once security conditions improve, particularly by resuming operations in Lulimbi and other ecologically rich zones (UNESCO, 2024). Despite the setbacks, the resilience of the Tchegera site demonstrates that eco-tourism remains a viable development pathway for Virunga, provided security is reestablished.
Sustainable use
Serious Concern
Virunga National Park has implemented mechanisms to regulate sustainable resource use and mitigate negative impacts on its ecological integrity. The participatory demarcation process, which involves local communities, political-administrative authorities, and customary leaders, aims to define and enforce park boundaries to prevent encroachment while maintaining sustainable access to resources (USAID, 2024). Sustainable initiatives such as community trackers and co-managed fishing cooperatives on Lake Edward have been established to support legal, regulated resource use, minimizing illegal exploitation while promoting local economic benefits (USAID, 2024) . Additionally, the Virunga Alliance initiative incorporates sustainable agricultural practices and reforestation programs to provide alternative livelihoods for communities dependent on natural resource extraction (Re:wild, 2024).
Despite these efforts, unsanctioned resource use remains a major conservation threat. Armed groups, including M23, ADF, and Mai Mai militias, generate revenue from illegal logging, charcoal production, poaching, and unregulated fishing, fueling environmental degradation and armed conflict (USAID, 2024). Illegal cocoa and coffee smuggling also pose significant governance challenges, as armed actors exploit park resources and undermine local economies (USAID, 2024).
Local rightsholders have access to certain natural resources through sustainable fishing programs, agricultural projects, and community-managed conservation initiatives. The park has worked with local cooperatives to formalize resource use rights, particularly in the Lake Edward fishing industry, ensuring that traditional fishers can operate legally while preserving aquatic ecosystems (USAID, 2024) . Additionally, community-managed forest initiatives and agroforestry projects provide local populations with sustainable alternatives to deforestation-driven livelihoods (Re:wild, 2024) . However, ongoing security challenges and illicit trafficking networks continue to pose barriers to fully sustainable resource management (USAID, 2024).
Monitoring
Mostly Effective
Virunga National Park has implemented an extensive monitoring system that integrates aerial surveillance, ground patrols, camera traps, and wildlife tracking to protect its biodiversity and counter illegal activities. In 2024, the park expanded its aerial surveillance operations, covering a total perimeter of 417 km and monitoring 468,270 hectares. These efforts were enhanced by the use of drones, which logged a total of 230,828 km in monitoring flights, enabling rapid detection of illegal activities such as poaching, deforestation, and armed group movements (UNESCO 2024) .
Virunga has also increased its reliance on camera traps, particularly in the Ishasha Valley and Mount Tshiaberimu, where they are used to observe wildlife populations, track poachers, and monitor armed group activity. In 2023, 799 foot patrols were conducted on Mount Tshiaberimu, with 89.2% dedicated to Grauer’s gorilla monitoring. Additional species observed include chimpanzees, lions, elephants, and pangolins. These devices have also helped confirm the presence of poachers using dogs and hippo spears, prompting targeted ranger deployments (USAID 2024).
A key component of wildlife monitoring has been the satellite collaring of lions, an effort aimed at understanding their movement patterns and mitigating human-wildlife conflict. In May 2024, the park successfully collared a newly identified male lion, Aibu, who frequently moves between Virunga and Queen Elizabeth National Park. The collaring program has been crucial for monitoring population recovery and protecting lions from retaliatory killings and poaching (USAID 2024).
Mountain gorilla monitoring in Virunga National Park has been significantly affected by security challenges, particularly in the Mikeno Sector, which has been under the control of M23 rebels since 2022, preventing uniformed ICCN staff from conducting direct population assessments. Despite these obstacles, community trackers have played a crucial role in monitoring gorilla movements, detecting illegal activities, and removing snares placed by poachers. These efforts have been essential in ensuring the continued protection of Virunga’s mountain gorilla population (Re:wild, 2024).
Research
Highly Effective
Research within Virunga National Park is a critical part of its conservation strategy, focusing on biodiversity monitoring, disease prevention, and ecological restoration. One of the key research activities involves wildlife monitoring through aerial and ground surveillance, particularly for flagship species such as lions, elephants, and gorillas. In the Ishasha Valley, foot patrols combined with camera traps and collared animal movement tracking have provided critical data on predator behavior, population dynamics, and threats such as poaching and habitat encroachment (Re:wild, 2024). Similarly, on Mt. Tshiaberimu, 89.2% of all foot patrols conducted in 2023 were dedicated to monitoring Grauer’s gorillas, a critically endangered subspecies found in the park (USAID, 2024) .
Virunga’s research programs also play a crucial role in disease monitoring and outbreak prevention. The park collaborates with Gorilla Doctors and regional veterinary teams to conduct quarterly health checks for Eastern Lowland Gorillas, with an emphasis on preventing disease transmission between wildlife and human populations (USAID, 2024). Additionally, anthrax early detection protocols have been established in the savanna ecosystems, as hippos are particularly vulnerable to this disease due to their water-based behavior. Virunga has also implemented a transboundary disease monitoring strategy with Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), using a shared WhatsApp group to rapidly communicate potential disease outbreaks in real-time (USAID, 2024).
Beyond wildlife health, ecological restoration research has been a priority, particularly in the Ishasha Valley, where 38 research plots have been established to study methods of controlling invasive plant species (USAID, 2024). Research also informs conservation action, with findings from joint large mammal aerial surveys indicating a 400% increase in populations of large herbivores since 2014, demonstrating the positive impact of conservation interventions (USAID, 2024).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Some Concern
Virunga National Park’s management system addresses several significant external threats, including armed group activity, illegal resource exploitation, and transboundary security challenges. Through collaboration with FARDC, local law enforcement, and the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), the park has implemented joint patrols, intelligence-sharing, and targeted law enforcement operations, leading to over 1,100 arrests and the destruction of 240 illegal charcoal kilns in 2024 (USAID, 2024). The LoRaWAN early warning system has enhanced security monitoring by allowing communities to report threats in real-time, while participatory land demarcation has helped reduce encroachment risks (USAID, 2024). However, persistent regional instability, militia control of illicit trade, and population displacement continue to pose significant conservation challenges, requiring ongoing adaptive management, strengthened enforcement, and increased conservation funding to sustain long-term protection efforts (Re:wild, 2024).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Some Concern
Since 2020, ICCN has adopted modern conservation technologies, including SMART monitoring systems and a grievance management system, to enhance ecological oversight and community engagement (Re:wild, 2024). These tools have improved response times to illegal activities and facilitated better decision-making in conservation planning. The park has also increased ranger salaries and recruited 78 new eco-guards in 2024 to bolster enforcement efforts (UNESCO, 2024). Additionally, strategic conservation partnerships have allowed for expanded training programs, ensuring rangers are well-equipped to handle the evolving challenges in the park. However, ongoing security challenges from armed groups continue to pose threats to management effectiveness (USAID, 2024).
In a context of continuing civil strife, insecurity, and political instability, the park faces enormous management challenges. The issues of mass encroachments, presence of armed militia, including the occupation of Rwandan-supported M23 through much of the park in 2024, commercial charcoal making, illegal fishing, and oil exploration require greater political leadership by the DRC government in support of park management. While park leadership is strong and remarkable efforts (and sacrifices) are being made to save the park’s World Heritage attributes despite the enormous challenges, the occupation of large swaths of the park, including the Mikeno sector, has severely eroded the overall protection and management of the park. The significant financial and technical support to the park from public and private partners in recent years has been critical to reducing threats and leading to several successes in terms of increasing wildlife populations, particularly in the Central Sector. However, a diplomatic resolution to the Rwandan-supported M23 rebels is needed to ensure effective protection and management. Until a resolution to this conflict is found, it is unlikely that management will be in a position to ensure overall protection of the park.
Good practice examples
In a serious situation of ongoing conflict, the Park enables the conservation of the World Heritage values of Virunga through the implementation of activities relating to a green economy (e.g., hydropower at Matebe) to contribute to peace and ensure the development in the buffer area and the financial resources for the Park by an adaptive, innovative, and proactive management. The fact that mountain gorilla tourism has continued to generate significant revenue for the Park despite the ongoing conflict demonstrates the remarkable level of success park management authorities are achieving with these activities.

Aesthetically spectacular afro-montane and alpine landscape of Rwenzori Mountains

Low Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
Overall, the aesthetic quality is intact. Although the glaciers have been receding (600ha in 1906 to 200 ha in 2005) (Languy & De Merode, 2006) and almost completely disappeared (Bosson et al., 2019) the aesthetically spectacular landscape remains (IUCN Consultation, 2020).

Spectacular Virunga volcanoes with frequent volcanic activity

Low Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
Aesthetic quality intact, although threatened by degradation of the natural forests on and around them as a result of illegal charcoal making (UNESCO and IUCN, 2010).

Aesthetically spectacular concentrations of large mammal fauna in the savannah plains

High Concern
Trend
Improving
The large mammal fauna in the savannah plains of Virunga National Park has shown signs of recovery despite ongoing security threats and poaching incidents. The elephant population, primarily concentrated in the Ishasha Valley and southern corridors, was estimated at 544 in 2023, though this marks a decrease from the over 700 recorded in 2021, potentially due to their migration between Virunga and Queen Elizabeth National Park 418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report (2024). Hippos have demonstrated an upward trend, with numbers in the Ishasha River rising from 150 in 2018 to 225 in 2023, despite sporadic poaching incidents 418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report (2024). Lion populations remain critically low but are being actively monitored through satellite tracking, with 11 individuals identified across three prides 418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report (2024). Conservation efforts, including increased patrols, aerial surveillance, and electric fencing, have contributed to reducing human-wildlife conflict and protecting key species, though the persistent presence of armed groups and habitat encroachment continues to pose significant challenges.

Active and extinct volcanoes as a result of ongoing tectonic movements along the Albertine Rift

Good
Trend
Data Deficient
Intact (UNESCO and IUCN, 2010)

Exceptionally high biodiversity resulting from a unique combination of uninterrupted gradient of habitat types from 680m to 5,109m and geographic location within three bio-geographic regions.

Data Deficient
Trend
Data Deficient
The uninterrupted gradient of habitats from 680m to 5,115m is threatened in places by encroachment and habitat destruction. The long and narrow shape of the park (300km long, average width 25km with a minimum of 2.5km), over 1150km of boundary (Languy & De Merode, 2006), makes it particularly vulnerable to pressures, especially as it is located in an area with one of Africa’s densest human populations. With the exception of emblematic large mammal species such as gorillas, elephants, okapi, hippo, and savannah ungulates, up-to-date data on the distribution and abundance of most of the plant and animal species are lacking for the entire park. There are no known cases of species extinction in the park.

Presence of several endangered and emblematic mammal species

Critical
Trend
Data Deficient
The gorilla populations in Virunga National Park face significant challenges due to security threats, habitat encroachment, and disease risks. The Mikeno Sector, home to the park’s entire mountain gorilla population, has been under the control of the M23 rebel group since 2022, preventing ICCN staff from conducting direct monitoring. However, community trackers have been able to intermittently observe the population, reporting three new births and no observed fatalities in the past year (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report (2024)). In Mt. Tshiaberimu, the population of critically endangered Grauer’s gorillas increased from 7 to 11 due to the successful reintroduction of four female Grauer gorillas transferred from GRACE, a gorilla sanctuary in Eastern DRC. Increased ranger patrols aim to enhance the protection of this population (2024 Annual Performance Report to USAID). Despite ongoing conflict, no major poaching incidents affecting gorillas have been recorded, and targeted disease monitoring has not detected any significant health threats (418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2024). Conservation measures such as veterinary interventions and habitat restoration continue to be priorities.

In 2023 and 2024, Okapi conservation at the park has been reinforced with new monitoring initiatives, particularly in the Mt. Hoyo corridor, where camera traps have been deployed to establish baseline population data and behavioral observations (2024 Annual Performance Report to USAID). Chimpanzee populations have benefited from stabilization efforts, particularly in the Ishasha Valley and northern regions, where Virunga has extended its presence into the Semliki Valley and Watalinga. Despite some individuals showing signs of disease, recent observations and testing by conservation partners have not identified a widespread health concern among the chimpanzee population (418108 Virunga-GWC Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report 2021). Monkeys, while not explicitly detailed in recent reports, are likely benefiting from broader ecosystem protection measures aimed at mitigating poaching and habitat destruction.

Endemic species

Critical
Trend
Data Deficient
Several species endemic to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) are found within Virunga National Park. One of the most notable is the eastern lowland gorilla (Gorilla beringei graueri), also known as Grauer’s gorilla, which has a small, isolated population on Mt. Tshiaberimu within the park. The park has increased habitat protection and, in 2024, reintroduced 4 individuals to strengthen the population. Another key endemic species is the okapi (Okapia johnstoni), which has been reconfirmed in the recently reclaimed Mt. Hoyo Reserve, an important conservation area that in 2024 was put under the management of the park.

Exact data is lacking for most other endemic species. Hunting and habitat degradation are likely to be a concern for L’Hoest’s monkey. Hunting may be a concern for the Ruwenzori duiker. Threats to smaller endemic vertebrate species are probably low, but this could change if habitat loss/degradation accelerates (UNESCO and IUCN, 2010).

Rwenzori Mountains, uplifted from the floor of the Albertine Rift as a result of recent (<3m years) movement of tectonic plates

Good
Trend
Stable
Intact (UNESCO and IUCN, 2010).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Data Deficient
The status of landscape attributes relating to criteria (vii) (superlative natural phenomena) and (viii) (outstanding examples representing major stages of earth’s history) is good and is likely to remain so. However, the biological attributes relating to criterion (vii) (exceptionally large mammal biomass) are severely degraded, although the situation can recover if sustained protection is applied. In recent times, there has been progress in this area with increasing numbers of some of the charismatic large mammals. The status of attributes relating to criterion (x) (significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity) is a concern because of encroachment and habitat degradation. The trend is reversible if strong political leadership is given to support park management’s law enforcement and conservation actions.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
High Concern
Data Deficient
Illegal fishing settlements are encroaching on wetland overwintering sites for Palearctic migrants. Extensive overfishing is depleting fish stocks and threatening food security for local populations. The perspectives for inversing the trend are not encouraging as the necessary strong political leadership is currently lacking. However recovery of the fish stocks will be feasible if proper protection measures can be implemented and maintained.

Additional information

Water provision (importance for water quantity and quality)
The mountainous region covered with natural vegetation ensures steady supplies of clean water outside the park for households and agriculture, and for the whole White Nile, and contributes to mitigating the frequency of landslides and erosion. Virunga NP has built and now manages three run-of-the-river hydroelectric plants, providing electricity to local people and businesses, providing an sustainable alternative to charcoal. A fourth plant is scheduled to come online in 2025. The electricity is also essential to supplying clean water to the population of Goma and surround areas.
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Habitat change
Impact level - High
Trend - Increasing
Forests being changed illegally to agricultural land could lead to landslides and erosion affecting water quality.
Outdoor recreation and tourism
High-end tourism generates significant benefits for the park and local communities (through revenue sharing and employment). The spectacular landscapes (Rift Valley, volcanoes, snow-capped Ruwenzori Mountains, savannas, lakes) are also of very high tourist value, along with many of the charismatic large mammals in the savannah (Languy & De Merode, 2006).
Fishing areas and conservation of fish stocks
The fish resources of Lake Edward are of very high value both economically and in terms of food security for the 3 million people living around the park (Languy & De Merode, 2006).
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Overexploitation
Impact level - High
Trend - Increasing
There is evidence of over fishing in Lake Edward and depletion of fish stocks
The park contains many endemic species (e.g., Okapi), two subspecies of gorilla, many other charismatic species, and spectacular landscapes. It is a primary source for both the Nile and Congo rivers and provides clean water for millions of people.

The national and global benefits in terms of nature conservation (biodiversity), recreation (tourism), water supplies, and food (fish) are incontestable and of very high importance.

However, given the extraordinarily difficult context of eastern Congo (continuing war, absence of rule of law, extreme poverty, looting of natural resources), the benefits for communities outside the park are probably not appreciated at their real value. At the national level, it is also a matter of very serious concern that the national and global benefits of the park appear to be undervalued (as evidenced by the possibility of degazettement as a result of oil exploitation, and the unwillingness/inability to confront the problem of illegal encroachments and the presence of armed militia).

References

References
1
418108 Virunga-GWC Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report (2021) Virunga National Park (2021). 418108 Virunga-GWC Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report: Restoring the Natural and Economic Value of Virunga National Park. Rewild, Virunga Foundation, European Commission
2
418108 Virunga-GWC Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report (2022) Virunga National Park (2022). 418108 Virunga-GWC Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report: Restoring the Natural and Economic Value of Virunga National Park. Rewild, Virunga Foundation, European Commission
3
Bosson, J. B., Huss, M., & Osipova, E. (2019). Disappearing world heritage glaciers as a keystone of nature conservation in a changing climate. Earth's Future, 7(4), 469-479.
4
Cibemba, A., & Baruka, G. (2023). Promotion of Charcoal Alternative May Help Fight Deforestation in Virunga National Park. World Resources Institute. Retrieved from https://www.wri.org/update/promotion-charcoal-alternative-m…
5
Einhorn, G., & de Merode, E. (2024). Virunga National Park: How Congo is bringing life and livelihoods back through creative conservation. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/01/virunga-congo-conse… .
6
Erickson-Davis, M. (2021). Deforestation spikes in Virunga National Park, DRC. Mongabay. Retrieved from https://news.mongabay.com/2021/06/deforestation-spikes-in-v…
7
IUCN Consultation (2020). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation form: Virunga National Park, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
8
IUCN and UNESCO (2018). Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre – IUCN Reactive Monitoring Mission Report Virunga National Park (Democratic Republic of Congo). Gland, Switzerland and Paris, France: IUCN and UNESCO World Heritage Centre. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/63/documents/ [Accessed 20 September 2019].
9
Kiriko, J., & McGinnis, A. (2024). Fishing on the Frontier: Fishermen Can No Longer Make a Living From Fishing on Lake Edward in the DRC. Pulitzer Center. Retrieved from https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/fishing-frontier-fisherm…
10
Languy, M. and de Merode., E. (2006). A brief overview of Virunga National Park. pp. 21-64 in Languy, M. and E. de Merode. eds. Virunga: the survival of Africa’s first National park. Lannoo, Tielt, Belgium.
11
Mongabay News. (2023, November). In DRC, Virunga deforestation escalates as fighting sends refugees into park. Retrieved from https://news.mongabay.com/2023/11/in-drc-virunga-deforestat….
12
National Geographic (2019). What it takes to protect gorillas from Ebola. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/protecti…
13
Nyirabihogo, N. (2023). Thousands have taken refuge near DRC’s Virunga National Park. Can the park survive? Global Press Journal. Retrieved from https://globalpressjournal.com/africa/democratic-republic-o…
14
Rainforest Rescue (2024). Democratic Republic of Congo: Government calls off oil auction. Retrieved from https://www.rainforest-rescue.org/updates/12796/democratic-….
15
Reuters (2024). DR Congo conflict fuels forest loss. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/dr-congo-conflict-fuel…
16
Reuters (2024). DR Congo conflict fuels forest loss. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/dr-congo-conflict-fuel….
17
Rugiririza, E., & Sengenya, C. (2020). Bled by armed groups, Congo’s Virunga Park wants justice. JusticeInfo.net. Retrieved from https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/45177-bled-by-armed-groups-c…
18
Save Virunga (2020). Leave Ngaji Block out of Oil Licensing, Protect Queen Elizabeth NP and Virunga Landscape! Available at: https://savevirunga.com/2019/06/03/leave-ngaji-block-out-of… [Accessed 25 July 2020].
19
State Party of the Democratic Republic of Congo (2018). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Virunga National Park (Democratic Republic of Congo). [online] Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/63/documents/ [Accessed 20 September 2019].
20
State Party of the Democratic Republic of Congo (2019). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Virunga National Park (Democratic Republic of Congo). [online] Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/63/documents/ [Accessed 20 September 2019].
21
State Party of the Democratic Republic of Congo (2020). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Virunga National Park (Democratic Republic of Congo). [online] Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/63/documents/
22
State Party of the Democratic Republic of Congo (2021). Rapport Périodique Cycle 3, Section II: Virunga National Park. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/216027 [Accessed on 1 August 2025]
23
State Party of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (2016). Draft Plan d’Aménagement et de Gestion du Parc National des Virunga, 2011-2015. Virunga, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
24
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. (2024). DRC calls off oil and gas auction following allegations of backroom deals. Retrieved from https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2024-10-14/dr…
25
The Guardian. (2024). Children executed and women raped in front of their families as M23 militia unleashes fresh terror on DRC. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2024/dec/21/….
26
UNESCO (2017). Report on the State of Conservation of Virunga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3509 (Accessed 17 August 2017).
27
UNESCO (2018). Report on the State of Conservation of Virunga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3815 [Accessed 20 September 2019].
28
UNESCO (2024). Report on the State of Conservation of Virunga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/63/documents/
29
UNESCO and IUCN (2010). Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre – IUCN Reactive Monitoring Mission to Virunga National Park (Democratic Republic of Congo), from 11 to 21 December (2010). [online] Paris, France and Gland, Switzerland: UNESCO World Heritage Centre and IUCN, pp.1-44. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/63/documents/ [Accessed 15 November 2024].
30
UNESCO. (2019). Report on the State of Conservation of Virunga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3847 [Accessed 20 September 2019].
31
Virunga Foundation (2024). Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Performance Report: USAID’s Virunga Development Activity. Washington, D.C. and Goma, DRC: USAID and Virunga Foundation.
32
Virunga National Park (2024). 418108 Virunga-Rewild Annex VI a Interim Narrative Report: Restoring the Natural and Economic Value of Virunga National Park. Rewild, Virunga Foundation, European Commission
33
World Heritage Committee (2012). Decision : 36 COM 8E - Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value. In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 36th Session (St Petersberg, 2012). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, pp.12-13. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2012/whc12-36com-19e.pdf.
34
World Heritage Committee (2018). Decision WHC/18/42.COM/7A.52. General Decision on the properties of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). [online] Manama, Bahrain: World Heritage Committee. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2018/whc18-42com-18-en.pdf [Accessed 27 September 2019].
35
Zimmerman, D. M., Hardgrove, E., Sullivan, S., Mitchell, S., Kambale, E., Nziza, J., Ssebide, B., Shalukoma, C., Cranfield, M., Pandit, P. S., Troth, S. P., Callicrate, T., Miller, P., Gilardi, K., & Lacy, R. C. (2023). Projecting the impact of an Ebola virus outbreak on endangered mountain gorillas. Scientific Reports, 13(5675). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32432-8

Indigenous Heritage values

Would you like to share feedback to support the accuracy of information for this site? If so, send your comments below.

التحقق
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.