Forêts humides Gondwana de l’Australie
Country
Australia
Inscribed in
1986
Criteria
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "significant concern" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
Ce site, qui comprend plusieurs aires protégées, se trouve principalement le long du Grand Escarpement sur la côte est de l’Australie. Les caractéristiques géologiques exceptionnelles présentes autour des cratères des volcans boucliers et le nombre élevé d’espèces rares et menacées qu’abrite ce site sont d’une importance internationale pour la science et la conservation. © UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
11 oct 2025
Significant concern
Current state and trend of VALUES
High Concern
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
Outstanding examples of significant ongoing geological processes
Criterion
(viii)
When Australia separated from Antarctica following the break-up of Gondwana, new continental margins developed and volcanoes erupted in sequence along the east coast resulting in the Main Range, Tweed, Focal Peak, Ebor and Barrington volcanic shields. This sequence of volcanos is significant as it enables the dating of the geomorphic evolution of eastern Australia through the study of the interaction of these volcanic remnants with the eastern highlands. The Tweed Shield erosion caldera is possibly the best preserved erosion caldera in the world, notable for its size and age, for the presence of a prominent central mountain mass (Wollumbin/Mt Warning), and for the erosion of the caldera floor to basement rock. All three stages relating to the erosion of shield volcanoes (the planeze, residual and skeletal stages) are readily distinguishable. Further south, the remnants of the Ebor Volcano also provide an outstanding example of the ongoing erosion of a shield volcano (World Heritage Committee, 2012).
Outstanding examples of relict plant species
Criterion
(ix)
The Age of the Pteridophytes’ from the Carboniferous Period (with some of the oldest elements of the world’s ferns), and the ‘Age of Conifers’ in the Jurassic Period (with one of the most significant centres of survival for Araucarians, the most ancient and phylogenetically primitive of the world’s conifers) are represented in the site. The site also provides an outstanding record of the ‘Age of the Angiosperms’. This includes a centre of endemism for primitive flowering plants originating in the Early Cretaceous, the most diverse assemblage of relict angiosperm taxa representing the primary radiation of dicotyledons in the mid-Late Cretaceous, a unique record of the evolutionary history of Australian rainforests representing the ‘golden age’ of the Early Tertiary, and a unique record of Miocene vegetation that was the antecedent of modern temperate rainforests in Australia (World Heritage Committee, 2012).
Outstanding examples of relict and other vertebrate and invertebrate species
Criterion
(ix)
The site contains an outstanding number of songbird species, including lyrebirds (Menuridae), scrub-birds (Atrichornithidae), treecreepers (Climacteridae) and bowerbirds and catbirds (Ptilonorhynchidae), belonging to some of the oldest lineages of passerines that evolved in the Late Cretaceous. Outstanding examples of other relict vertebrate and invertebrate fauna from ancient lineages linked to the break-up of Gondwana also occur in the site (World Heritage Committee, 2012). Relict frogs include all frogs in Myobatrachidae (recently subdivided into Myobatrachidae and Limnodynastidae, with some authors recognising a third family Rheobatrachidae (Frost et. al., 2014) and Pelodryadidae families. Relict species of reptiles include chelid turtles Emydura macquarii signata and Myuchelys latisternum, leaf-tailed gecko (Saltuarius spp.) and the southern angle-headed dragon (Lophosaurus spinipes). Relict invertebrates include fresh-water crayfish; land snails; velvet worms; a number of beetle families including flightless carabid beetles; the second largest butterfly in Australia the Richmond birdwing (Ornithoptera richmondia) and glow-worms (State Party of Australia, 1994; Hunter, 2004).
Outstanding examples of ongoing evolutionary processes
Criterion
(ix)
Ongoing evolutionary processes continue within the site’s rainforests which were described in the nomination dossier as ‘an archipelago of refugia, a series of distinctive habitats that characterise a temporary endpoint in climatic and geomorphological evolution’. The distances between these ‘islands’ of rainforest represent barriers to the flow of genetic material for those taxa which have low dispersal ability, and this pressure has created the potential for continued speciation (World Heritage Committee, 2012). Several important phylogeograhic papers have appeared that address the “archipelago” and the consequences for gene flow and speciation (eg. Bryant and Krosch, 2016).
Endemic and threatened plants
Criterion
(x)
The Gondwana Rainforests protects the largest and best stands of rainforest habitat remaining in this region, containing many endemic and threatened plant species. Over 170 families, 695 genera and 1625 species of vascular plants have been recorded, with about 150 endemics (World Heritage Committee, 2012). Given new discoveries and more recent taxonomic changes, these figures are likely to be higher.
Endemic and threatened mammals
Criterion
(x)
The Gondwana Rainforests protects endemic and threatened mammals such as the recently discovered black-tailed dusky antechinus Antechinus arktos. This species is known from three isolated subpopulations located at the summit of the Tweed Shield Volcano caldera near the border of south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales, at altitudes above 950 m above sea level (asl) (Threatened Species Scientific Committee, 2017). This area is part of the Springbrook National Park and Lamington National Park in Queensland, and the Border Ranges National Park in New South Wales. The region represents the major distribution of the Hastings River Mouse (Pseudomys oralis) and Parma Wallaby (Macropus parma). The population of the Broad-toothed Rat (Mastacomys fuscus) in Barrington Tops in New South Wales is restricted to higher altitudes and was impacted by the 2019-2020 bushfires. The species is now listed as endangered throughout New South Wales (Shultz et al. 2024; Legge et al 2021). Thirty-one species of bats, half of all Australia’s bat species, occur in the site (IUCN, 1994; World Heritage Committee, 2012). The Golden-tipped Bat (Phoniscus papuensis) which was thought to be extinct until the 1980s in Australia (Lloyd and Pennay, 2021; Woodside et al 2023), is found along the river corridors in the Barrington Tops National Park and in rainforest and sclerophyll forest further north (Schulz,1999).
Endemic and threatened birds
Criterion
(x)
More than 270 species of birds have been recorded (about 38% of all Australian birds) with two species of lyrebirds (Albert’s lyrebird Menura alberti and superb lyrebird M. novaehollandiae) and the nationally endangered rufous scrub-bird (Atrichornis rufescens). Other threatened bird species include the Coxen's fig-parrot (Cyclopsitta diophthalma coxeni) (possibly extinct), black-breasted button-quail (Turnix melanogaster) and eastern bristlebird (Dasyornis brachypterus) (State Party of Australia, 1994).
Endemic and threatened frogs
Criterion
(x)
Some 47 species of frogs, about 25% of Australia’s total frog fauna, including the pouched frog (Assa darlingtoni) and the recently identified Wollumbin hip-pocket frog (Assa wollumbin) known from just one location in the property and the Mount Ballow mountain frog (Philoria knowlesi). Other frogs with distributions largely confined to the site include the mountain frog (Philoria/Kyarranus kundagungan), Loveridge’s frog (P./K. loveridgei), Pugh’s mountain frog (P. pughi), Richmond Range frog (P. richmondensis), sphagnum frog (P. sphagnicolus), Fleay’s barred frog (Mixophyes fleayi), Davies tree frog (Litoria daviesae), Pearson’s frog (L. pearsoniana), and glandular frog (L. subglandulosa) (State Party of Australia, 1994, species names updated based on the recent nomenclature). A new mountain frog has also been recently identified in the Focal Peak group of reserves, the Mount Ballow Mountain frog (Philoria knowslsei).
Endemic and threatened reptiles
Criterion
(x)
About 110 species of reptiles, including the world’s largest skink the land mullet (Egernia/Bellatorias major). Several other species with the major part of their distribution within property include Southern angle-headed dragon (Lophosaurus spinipes); Southern leaf-tailed gecko (Saltuarius swaini); rainforest cool-skink (Harrisoniascincus/Cautula zia); three-toed snake-tooth skink (Coeranoscincus reticulatus); Border Ranges shadeskink (Saproscincus challengerii); montane sunskink (Lamphrophlis caligula) (restricted to Barrington Tops region); short-limbed snake-skink (Ophioscincus truncatus) and Murray’s skink (Karma murrayi) and Tryon's skink (Karma tryoni) (State Party of Australia, 1994; IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Endangered ecological communities
Criterion
(x)
Lowland Rainforest of Subtropical Australia is a Commonwealth listed endangered ecological community found within the Gondwana Rainforests reserves. The Lowland Rainforest of Subtropical Australia ecological community primarily occurs from Maryborough in Queensland to the Clarence River (near Grafton) in New South Wales (NSW). The ecological community also includes isolated areas between the Clarence River and Hunter River such as the Bellinger and Hastings Valleys. The ecological community has the most diverse tree flora of any vegetation type in NSW (Floyd, 1990) and the species composition of the canopy varies between local stands and between regions (Keith, 2004). The canopy comprises a range of tree species but in some
areas a particular species may dominate e.g. palm forest, usually dominated by Archontophoenix cunninghamiana (bangalow palm) or Livistona australis (cabbage palm); and riparian areas dominated by Syzygium floribundum (syn. Waterhousea floribunda) (weeping satinash/weeping lilly pilly). Lowland Rainforest is characterised by a high proportion of frugivorous birds, epiphyte and litter foraging vertebrates, micro- and mega-chiropteran bats, and a broad range of invertebrate groups associated with the decomposition cycle (such as insects and snails).
areas a particular species may dominate e.g. palm forest, usually dominated by Archontophoenix cunninghamiana (bangalow palm) or Livistona australis (cabbage palm); and riparian areas dominated by Syzygium floribundum (syn. Waterhousea floribunda) (weeping satinash/weeping lilly pilly). Lowland Rainforest is characterised by a high proportion of frugivorous birds, epiphyte and litter foraging vertebrates, micro- and mega-chiropteran bats, and a broad range of invertebrate groups associated with the decomposition cycle (such as insects and snails).
Indigenous Uses, Occupation and Custodial Role
The First Nations Peoples of Australia have the longest continuous culture in the world and have more than 65,000 years of accumulated knowledge of the landscapes, long-term changes in the environment and cultural practices that affected the shape of some environments with use of fire. For the most part, they remain deeply connected to country. There is evidence that local Indigenous custodians have continuously occupied the Gondwana forests of eastern Australia for at least 6000 years (McBryde,1974) before European colonisation and all its subsequent impacts. There are many well-worn walking tracks traversing from coastal zones to the highlands (Fox, 2003) and linking areas of the higher rainforests, many showing significant ceremonial sites and evidence of continuing cultural links with local Indigenous groups. The forest provided local Aboriginal people with abundant and seasonal food, hunting grounds, medicine, materials for tools, weapons an shelters, but the landscape continues to be significant not only for the resources it provides but also for the many places of deep spiritual significance and relationship to 'country' (Bowdler, 2000). The deep knowledge of 'country' is shared through stories shared over thousands of generations and is important in understanding the dynamics of the rainforests, its resources and the responsibilities of custodians. This knowledge may be of particular importance in the recovery of damaged areas. The Traditional Owners of the Gondwana rainforest estate includes many Aboriginal nations such as Yugambeh, Yugarabul/Jagera, Gidabul, Wakka Waka in Queensland and Gittabhul, Bundjalung, Yaegl, Gumbaynggirr, Anaiwan, Dhani gadi, Worimi, Birpai, Geawagal in New South Wales (Lentz,1951; McIntyre-Tamwoy, Best and Fahey, 2010).
Assessment information
The impacts of climate change and high levels of visitation, undertaking effective fire management, and mitigating the effects of invasion by pest species and pathogens are the main challenges for the protection and management of the Gondwana Rainforests. Although there are several threats, there have also been notable management responses. However, even with excellent management response, given the sheer volume and diversity of threats facing the various components of the site, the threats are still assessed as high. The varied impact of the fires of 2019-2020 and their longer-term impacts are still being evaluated and the capacity of the areas to recover is still to be fully understood. The threats arising from adjacent land uses and management regimes are exacerbated by the large ratio of reserve boundaries to 'volume' of the reserved areas. The fragmented nature of the Gondwana rainforest remnants means that several activities outside the reserves can constitute a threat and require collaborative responses with other land and water managers. The additive effect of so many threats that originate in surrounding land uses can weaken the integrity of the rainforest and reduce its capacity to recover after fire or attack by pathogens. Pervasive threats such as climate change leading to changes in precipitation and temperature exacerbate threats both inside and outside the reserved areas.
Residential Areas, Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Incompatible land-use off-site)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Incompatible land-use on adjoining properties, escaped fires, groundwater extraction, uncontrolled domestic animals, garden weeds, feral animals and pressure for residential and tourist development may pose a threat in some locations. Off-site activities such as clearing and erosion within upstream catchments present a threat for the attributes of the Outstanding Universal Value in some sections of the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2017). The approval and construction of ecotourism infrastructure in some sections of the site have been subject to a thorough Environmental Impact Assessment process and approved by the federal and state government authorities (Queensland Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation; Commonwealth Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water).
These Gondwana remnants are effectively islands of rainforest habitat in a sea of various land uses and threats with long and complex boundaries with these land uses and high ratios of 'exposed edges' when compared to internally reserved areas in many cases. This means that dispersed activities such as beekeeping, broad acre cropping, weed treatment, changes in run-off patterns, or broader ground water extraction may sometimes penetrate into the reserve and are difficult to manage.
These Gondwana remnants are effectively islands of rainforest habitat in a sea of various land uses and threats with long and complex boundaries with these land uses and high ratios of 'exposed edges' when compared to internally reserved areas in many cases. This means that dispersed activities such as beekeeping, broad acre cropping, weed treatment, changes in run-off patterns, or broader ground water extraction may sometimes penetrate into the reserve and are difficult to manage.
Recreational Activities
(High levels of visitation)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Tourism development, increasing visitor numbers and visitor infrastructure is identified as a threat in some park management plans. There are high levels of visitation in several visitor precincts in a number of the reserves (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Visitation is managed to minimise impact while supporting the visitor experience and appreciation of values. Where management of human visitation is identified as an action required to protect a threatened species managed under the NSW Government’s Saving our Species program, responses of the target species to threat management are monitored. The Queensland’s State of the Environment Report (SoE, 2017) indicated that increasing visitor numbers, and associated supporting infrastructure, present a minor and localised threat, addressed within the relevant national park management plans and statements and considered the threat are low (SoE, 2017). Major flooding events caused landslides, tree falls, flood debris, and major repeat damage to facilities and infrastructure including roads, fire trails, bridges, causeways and walking tracks across the Gondwana Rainforests impacting visitation (State Party of Australia, 2022).
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species, Pathogens
(Pathogens)
Invasive/problematic species
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
Austropuccinia psidii
Other invasive species names
Phytophora cinnamomi, Psittacine circoviral
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Several introduced pathogens threaten the values of the World Heritage site including Phytophthora cinnamomi (a soil-borne water mould which infects the roots of native plants); Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a fungus which causes chytridiomycosis in frogs (amphibian chytrid disease); psittacine circoviral (beak and feather) disease infecting parrots, and myrtle rust (a disease of native Myrtaceae plants caused by the exotic fungus Austropuccinia psidii (initially identified as Uredo rangelii). The rapid spread and extraordinary impact of this pathogen poses a significant threat to the Gondwana Rainforests and has been attributed to the decline of Rhodamnia rubescens and Rhodomyrtus psidioides, which are now listed in both NSW and QLD as Critically Endangered (Threatened Species Scientific Committee, 2019; QLD Nature Conservation Act 1992). R. psidioides is one of the ten most seriously affected species in southeast Queensland with numerous reports of localized extinction in that area (Makinson, 2018). Lenwebbia sp. Main Range was also listed a critically endangered in NSW in October 2020, with Myrtle rust a key factor in the deteriorating status of this species (Threatened Species Scientific Committee, 2020). Extensive surveys assessing the impact of Myrtle rust were conducted following the 2019–2020 wildfires, funded by the Threatened Species Hub of the Australian Government National Environmental Science Program. Myrtle rust symptoms and damage were found in all survey sites in fire-affected areas of the Gondwana Rainforests. Myrtle rust prefers young leaves and the mass of new epicormic regrowth and young seedlings after fire provided the ideal conditions for the development and spread of the pathogen. Significant impacts were identified on Rhodamnia rubescens (scrub turpentine). Ongoing work will include monitoring of key sites, collection of material for ex-situ propagation, and augmentation of key populations with ex-situ material when required. The range of restricted and endangered Uromyrtus australis (peach myrtle), was also identified as being impacted. Work to address these impacts will include actions to exclude fire from relevant sites, monitoring myrtle rust and other threats, and further assessment of germination to identify issues affecting poor recruitment. In Queensland, the threat of myrtle rust is also being included in post-fire updates to inform national park planning processes. In addition, in certain national parks, hygiene protocols are being strengthened with improved vehicle washdown and visitor footbath facilities as part of the Bushfire Recovery Program.
Fire & Fire Management
(Fires)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Bushfires in the spring and summer of 2019–20 impacted approximately 196,000 hectares, or 53%, of the Gondwana Rainforests, including part of the ancient rainforests communities that are not adapted to regular fires. Ecological impacts from these fires were varied across the property (State Party of Australia, 2024). In several areas fires have burnt into rainforest that had previously never recorded a fire since management records commenced in the 1950s and 1960s and were generally considered resistant to fire. The fires were preceded by a prolonged drought and were coincident with a period of above average temperatures and below average rainfall (Australian Bureau of Meteorology Special Climate Statement 71, September 2019). Consequently, the rainforest endured the additive effects of high temperatures, lower precipitation, fires and shortly after, floods that eroded soils. Fire weather is projected to worsen, bushfires are likely to be of higher intensity, and bushfire seasons are likely to start earlier and last longer. This is decreasing the time in between fire seasons and may reduce opportunities for planned burning and fire-fighting resource sharing. A secondary impact of fire is exposed ground soil surface that as easily eroded by subsequent rainfall and major flooding as occurred 2021-22 (State Party of Australia, 2022).
A multitude of plant and animal species as attributes of World Heritage values are affected by fires and associated threats and the monitoring of fire impacts is ongoing.
Immediately following the 2019-20 bushfires significant funding was provided for bushfire recovery. There have not been any further extensive fires in the World Heritage property since 2019-20. Bushfire recovery continues to be part of the ongoing management at the property (State Party of Australia, 2024). Australia recognises the impact of climate change on the frequency and intensity of bushfires, and has committed to national and international climate action. In NSW, ecological consultants were contracted to undertake an assessment of the most heavily impacted reserves within the Gondwana Rainforests including Barrington Tops, Gibraltar Range, Washpool, New England, Oxley Wild Rivers, Werrikimbe, and Willi Willi national parks and the Castles Nature Reserve. They used a range of remote, aerial and field survey techniques to complete the rapid assessment with recommendations made for priority areas of impact and further work, such as identifying ecological communities to target recovery efforts. NSW NPWS staff assessed impacts in the remaining reserves (State Party of Australia, 2022) and a range of long-term monitoring studies were initiated. In Queensland, the then Department of Environment and Science undertook post-fire assessments on the three Gondwana Rainforests WH properties impacted by fire – Lamington NP, Mt Barney NP and Main Range NP (Hines et.al. 2020, 2021, 2022). Assessments included: fire extent and severity mapping using pre- and post-fire satellite imagery, with subsequent ground truthing; evaluation of ecological impact on ecosystems and significant species and; key management recommendations. Targeted threatened species assessment and threat management were also undertaken (Churchill et al. 2023).
Efforts to increase collaboration with the First Nations peoples of the Gondwana Rainforests, ongoing monitoring, pest plant and animal control, and enhanced fire management are being undertaken and will assist with recovery. Both NSW and Queensland are investing in new methods to monitor the health of the Gondwana Rainforests (together with other protected areas) and to evaluate management effectiveness and inform future actions. The Australian, NSW and Queensland governments continue to support and implement bushfire recovery actions. Management is shifting from immediate to longer-term recovery, and lessons identified in the 2019-20 bushfire season are being used to inform bushfire preparedness and ongoing management. To this end, land managers are working to enhance the application of techniques that reduce the risk and impacts of severe bushfire in the World Heritage property such as prescribed burns, pest management, monitoring programs, fire response planning, improved access and water infrastructure.
A multitude of plant and animal species as attributes of World Heritage values are affected by fires and associated threats and the monitoring of fire impacts is ongoing.
Immediately following the 2019-20 bushfires significant funding was provided for bushfire recovery. There have not been any further extensive fires in the World Heritage property since 2019-20. Bushfire recovery continues to be part of the ongoing management at the property (State Party of Australia, 2024). Australia recognises the impact of climate change on the frequency and intensity of bushfires, and has committed to national and international climate action. In NSW, ecological consultants were contracted to undertake an assessment of the most heavily impacted reserves within the Gondwana Rainforests including Barrington Tops, Gibraltar Range, Washpool, New England, Oxley Wild Rivers, Werrikimbe, and Willi Willi national parks and the Castles Nature Reserve. They used a range of remote, aerial and field survey techniques to complete the rapid assessment with recommendations made for priority areas of impact and further work, such as identifying ecological communities to target recovery efforts. NSW NPWS staff assessed impacts in the remaining reserves (State Party of Australia, 2022) and a range of long-term monitoring studies were initiated. In Queensland, the then Department of Environment and Science undertook post-fire assessments on the three Gondwana Rainforests WH properties impacted by fire – Lamington NP, Mt Barney NP and Main Range NP (Hines et.al. 2020, 2021, 2022). Assessments included: fire extent and severity mapping using pre- and post-fire satellite imagery, with subsequent ground truthing; evaluation of ecological impact on ecosystems and significant species and; key management recommendations. Targeted threatened species assessment and threat management were also undertaken (Churchill et al. 2023).
Efforts to increase collaboration with the First Nations peoples of the Gondwana Rainforests, ongoing monitoring, pest plant and animal control, and enhanced fire management are being undertaken and will assist with recovery. Both NSW and Queensland are investing in new methods to monitor the health of the Gondwana Rainforests (together with other protected areas) and to evaluate management effectiveness and inform future actions. The Australian, NSW and Queensland governments continue to support and implement bushfire recovery actions. Management is shifting from immediate to longer-term recovery, and lessons identified in the 2019-20 bushfire season are being used to inform bushfire preparedness and ongoing management. To this end, land managers are working to enhance the application of techniques that reduce the risk and impacts of severe bushfire in the World Heritage property such as prescribed burns, pest management, monitoring programs, fire response planning, improved access and water infrastructure.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species, Pathogens
(Invasive weeds)
Invasive/problematic species
Ageratina riparia
Ageratina adenophora
Lantana camara
Cinnamomum camphora
Ligustrum lucidum
Ligustrum sinense
Hedychium gardnerianum
Araujia sericifera
Cytisus scoparius
Other invasive species names
Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp.rotundata, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera, Rubus fructicosus, Andredera cordifolia, Macfadyena unguis-cati
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Removing ecosystem transforming weeds has been a priority for on-ground works across the fire impacted sections of the property (State Party of Australia, 2022). A variety of invasive plant species have been recorded including ox-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), and bitou bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp.rotundata) which affect coastal areas; mistflower (Ageratina riparia), crofton weed (Ageratina adenophora), lantana (Lantana camara), blackberry (Rubus fructicosus), camphor laurel (Cinnamomum camphora), broad-leaved privet (Ligustrum lucidum) and small-leaved privet (L. sinense), Kahili ginger (Hedychium gardnerianum), Madeira vine (Andredera cordifolia), moth vine (Araujia sericifera), cat's claw creeper (Macfadyena unguis-cati) and others. Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) is a particular problem in the southernmost part of the World Heritage site. At Barrington Tops, Scotch broom forms dense thickets that exclude native species, leading to its complete dominance of the understorey and eventually the canopy. These thickets also impede access, alter fire regimes and dominate the landscape. The weed is spread by animals and in water, such as creeks (OEH, 2014). Management response is guided by invasive species management plans in national parks. Treatment may include use of mechanical, chemical or biological controls that may each bring their own risks. Weeds able to establish in full shade (i.e. exploit intact rainforest) and affect the canopy are possibly the group of greatest threat to the site, while weeds in shade intolerant groups are most likely to be a threat to riparian edges and fragmented remnants (DECCW, 2010). High biomass weeds including invasive grasses and lantana can increase fire risk, particularly along forest edges. Areas of fire affected rainforest where the rainforest has had large scale impacts such as canopy loss are now carrying a vastly increased surface layer weed load of relatively common weed species. The long- term effect on the recovery of the rainforest by these pioneer weed species is unknown (IUCN Consultation, 2020c).
Other Human Disturbances
(Fragmentation)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
The Gondwana Rainforests of Australia is a serial World Heritage site comprised of eight separate groups of reserves, containing more than 40 component parts, often separated by some distance and spread across a wide latitudinal band. The Gondwana Rainforest reserves contain the major remaining areas of rainforest in north-east New South Wales and south-east Queensland and are disjunct in places due mainly to the naturally fragmented distribution of rainforest in this part of Australia. Some of the reserves are very small, but have some connectivity to neighbouring protected areas, often with the same or very similar values. The area to boundary ratio of fragmented reserves increases exposure to threats such as fire, weed and pathogen invasion, changes in the microclimate of otherwise intact rainforest, and potentially has negative impacts on natural biological processes (including altitudinal and latitudinal migration in response to climate change) (IUCN Consultation, 2017). On balance the Outstanding Universal Value of the site is secured through the large reserves, which represent the majority of the World Heritage site (Queensland State of the Environment Report, 2017). This could be improved by progressing the extension to the World Heritage site, including previously assessed contiguous protected areas with World Heritage attributes (IUCN Consultation, 2020c), establishing corridors and working collaboratively with other adjacent land managers and Indigenous custodians.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Vertebrate pests)
Invasive/problematic species
Vulpes vulpes
Oryctolagus cuniculus
Felis catus
Capra hircus
Canis lupus
Sus scrofa
Equus caballus
Rhinella marina
Bos taurus
Gambusia holbrooki
Other invasive species names
Cervidae spp.
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Introduced animals include foxes (Vulpes vulpes), rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), feral cats (Felis catus), goats (Capra hircus), wild dogs (Canis familiaris), feral pigs (Sus scrofa), feral deer (Cervidae spp.), feral horses (Equus caballus) and others.
Cats, foxes and dogs are widespread across the property. Predation by cats and foxes poses a significant threat to many ground-dwelling mammals and ground-nesting birds, while predation by dogs likely impacts larger macropods. The impacts of all three may be mediated by the extent and condition of habitat. NPWS manages wild dogs in accordance with the NSW Wild Dog Management Strategy. There is considerable interest in dingo conservation in Australia, including concerns about their genetic integrity and preserving their ecological roles. This strategy aims to promote a balance between managing wild dogs in areas where they have negative impacts and preserving their ecological roles elsewhere (NSW, 2022).
Large feral animals (deer, goats, horses and pigs) can have significant impacts on many natural ecosystems through selective grazing, overgrazing and trampling of vegetation, spreading weeds and pathogens, soil compaction and erosion, changes to nutrient cycling, and impacts on water quality. Feral pigs also prey on a broad suite of native fauna. Large feral animals likely occur at low densities in the Gondwana Rainforests reserves although some species can be abundant in some areas (e.g. horses and pigs on the Barrington Tops plateau).
Cane toads (Rhinella marina) are increasing in numbers in Border Ranges National Park. All these animals have an impact on the reserves either by displacement, predation or competition and their management is included in management plans (NPWS, 1998; NPWS, 2005; DERC, 2011). Straying stock (cattle, Bos taurus) pose a problem in some parts of the site (Chester and Bushnell, 2005). The introduced fish, plague minnow (Gambusia holbrooki), occurs in many streams. There are some locations where non-native sport fish (trout and salmon) are released into streams that flow into the reserves or the fish migrate upstream. The impact of these fish on native aquatic assemblages remains a matter for investigation.
Strategies to manage pest animals are guided by invasive species management plans in national parks. Controls are implemented in cooperation with neighbours as part of tenure blind approach to pest management through regional pest management strategies and plans in NSW (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Control priorities in national parks are determined based on risk. They consider potential and actual impacts on conservation, recreation, heritage and economic values, as well as biosecurity risks.
A controversial exotic invader is the European honey bee, which competes for nectar with native nectivores and occupies tree hollows that are used by native animals. A consequence of the wildfires of 2019-2020 was that in many locations the density of the vegetation was greatly reduced, which may have favoured introduced predators by compromising the capacity of the native animals to escape and seek shelter (Doherty et al. 2023). Vegetation recovery is now well progressed in most areas, and reduced vegetation density contributing to predation is unlikely to be a continuing consequence of the fires.
Cats, foxes and dogs are widespread across the property. Predation by cats and foxes poses a significant threat to many ground-dwelling mammals and ground-nesting birds, while predation by dogs likely impacts larger macropods. The impacts of all three may be mediated by the extent and condition of habitat. NPWS manages wild dogs in accordance with the NSW Wild Dog Management Strategy. There is considerable interest in dingo conservation in Australia, including concerns about their genetic integrity and preserving their ecological roles. This strategy aims to promote a balance between managing wild dogs in areas where they have negative impacts and preserving their ecological roles elsewhere (NSW, 2022).
Large feral animals (deer, goats, horses and pigs) can have significant impacts on many natural ecosystems through selective grazing, overgrazing and trampling of vegetation, spreading weeds and pathogens, soil compaction and erosion, changes to nutrient cycling, and impacts on water quality. Feral pigs also prey on a broad suite of native fauna. Large feral animals likely occur at low densities in the Gondwana Rainforests reserves although some species can be abundant in some areas (e.g. horses and pigs on the Barrington Tops plateau).
Cane toads (Rhinella marina) are increasing in numbers in Border Ranges National Park. All these animals have an impact on the reserves either by displacement, predation or competition and their management is included in management plans (NPWS, 1998; NPWS, 2005; DERC, 2011). Straying stock (cattle, Bos taurus) pose a problem in some parts of the site (Chester and Bushnell, 2005). The introduced fish, plague minnow (Gambusia holbrooki), occurs in many streams. There are some locations where non-native sport fish (trout and salmon) are released into streams that flow into the reserves or the fish migrate upstream. The impact of these fish on native aquatic assemblages remains a matter for investigation.
Strategies to manage pest animals are guided by invasive species management plans in national parks. Controls are implemented in cooperation with neighbours as part of tenure blind approach to pest management through regional pest management strategies and plans in NSW (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Control priorities in national parks are determined based on risk. They consider potential and actual impacts on conservation, recreation, heritage and economic values, as well as biosecurity risks.
A controversial exotic invader is the European honey bee, which competes for nectar with native nectivores and occupies tree hollows that are used by native animals. A consequence of the wildfires of 2019-2020 was that in many locations the density of the vegetation was greatly reduced, which may have favoured introduced predators by compromising the capacity of the native animals to escape and seek shelter (Doherty et al. 2023). Vegetation recovery is now well progressed in most areas, and reduced vegetation density contributing to predation is unlikely to be a continuing consequence of the fires.
Changes in Temperature Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Climate change, frequency and severity of weather events)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Climate change, resulting in increased average temperatures in all seasons, more hot days and warm spells with a substantial increase in the temperature reached on hot days, frequent and intense storms and flooding, and changes to the cloud base, mist availability, humidity or rainfall is emerging as one of the greatest challenges for the protection of Gondwana Rainforests World Heritage values (CSIRO, 2019). Climate change is also predicted to exacerbate other threats such as invasive species and pathogens, as well as fluctuations in rainfall patterns and altered fire regimes. In the Australian spring and summer of 2019-2020 extensive fires (51% surface area of the World Heritage site) was impacted in wild fires. The fires followed and were coincident with a prolonged drought (NSW DPIE, 2020; Dickman et al., 2020; DAWE, 2020). The Final Report of the NSW Bushfire Inquiry (DPC, 2020) stated that climate change clearly played a role in the extreme 2019/20 fire season.
Major flooding events occurred 2020, 2021, 2022 along the east coast of Australia. Impact assessment of the flood events on matters of national environmental significance, including the impacted World Heritage properties, and has informed prioritised responses (State Party of Australia, 2022). Ex Tropical Cyclone Alfred impacted Southeast Queensland and Northeast NSW with severe weather and flooding between 4 March and 31 March 2025. However, the OUV of the property was not heavily impacted and damage was restricted to visitor nodes, tracks and trails (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
NPWS finalised a climate change adaptation management plan for the World Heritage values of the Tweed Caldera group of Gondwana Rainforests reserves. The plan identifies actions to protect climate refugia, genetically rescue populations at risk and support the transition of habitats to maximise the conservation of biodiversity. Actions include fire management strategies to enhance protection of biodiverse climate refugia and establishing additional populations of native species in lower risk locations (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
The Australian Government National Environment Science Program (NESP) is funding a project to develop a climate change adaptation plan for focal culturally significant entities, threatened species and ecosystems of the Northern Rivers region in NSW which includes several of the Gondwana Rainforests reserves. The project is taking a co-design approach with First Nations organisations and involves consultation with multiple community groups, state and local governments to develop an online tool to assist with climate adaptation by local communities and governments (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Major flooding events occurred 2020, 2021, 2022 along the east coast of Australia. Impact assessment of the flood events on matters of national environmental significance, including the impacted World Heritage properties, and has informed prioritised responses (State Party of Australia, 2022). Ex Tropical Cyclone Alfred impacted Southeast Queensland and Northeast NSW with severe weather and flooding between 4 March and 31 March 2025. However, the OUV of the property was not heavily impacted and damage was restricted to visitor nodes, tracks and trails (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
NPWS finalised a climate change adaptation management plan for the World Heritage values of the Tweed Caldera group of Gondwana Rainforests reserves. The plan identifies actions to protect climate refugia, genetically rescue populations at risk and support the transition of habitats to maximise the conservation of biodiversity. Actions include fire management strategies to enhance protection of biodiverse climate refugia and establishing additional populations of native species in lower risk locations (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
The Australian Government National Environment Science Program (NESP) is funding a project to develop a climate change adaptation plan for focal culturally significant entities, threatened species and ecosystems of the Northern Rivers region in NSW which includes several of the Gondwana Rainforests reserves. The project is taking a co-design approach with First Nations organisations and involves consultation with multiple community groups, state and local governments to develop an online tool to assist with climate adaptation by local communities and governments (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Risk management is in place, but it is possible that new invasive species and pathogens could still arrive into the site, especially given the somewhat fragmented disposition of its component parts. Management responses to climate change are difficult, although mitigation by increasing connectivity between the different components could help. There is potential for increased level of ground water extraction in some parts of the property that could affect the hydrological cycles of the reserved areas while trying to meet the demands of irrigated agriculture, mining, fracking, manufacturing and urban growth in adjacent land areas especially with the uncertainty of climate change.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive species and pathogens)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Risk management is in place through strategic weed and pest animal plans, although it is likely that invasive species and pathogens could still arrive into the site given its multi-use functions and the somewhat fragmented disposition of its components (IUCN Consultation, 2020c). Another situation arises where weeds are controlled using chemical treatment and mechanical controls that may have secondary impacts in the conservation areas or affect the integrity of the system.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Relationships with local people across the World Heritage site are overall considered to be highly effective within existing structures but there is a need to engage more effectively with the First Nations people across the Gondwana reserves and integrate their perspectives, cultural connection and knowledge systems into management.
To inform the strategic management of its World Heritage properties and to find ways to work more effectively with Aboriginal peoples to protect their cultural heritage, NPWS has undertaken extensive consultation with the six Aboriginal language groups across the Greater Blue Mountains Area, and the three Traditional Tribal Groups within The Willandra Lakes Region with lessons that could be transferred to other parts of the world heritage estate and national parks if resources become available.
There are several advisory groups which provide input into the management of the site and volunteer groups undertake a variety of work in partnership with the managing agencies. Managing agencies are currently enhancing efforts to consult with, and better involve First Nations people in the management and governance of the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). However, while there is involvement of Aboriginal representatives on the various advisory committees and at least four Aboriginal communities that have formal agreements in place with NSW NPWS across the property, there is a recognised need for greater involvement of Aboriginal peoples (IUCN Consultation, 2020b) and to find new ways for improve "two-way learning". At all levels of government there is an increased investment in Indigenous ranges deployed through Commonwealth government, State governments, local governments and NRM bodies with a view to improving integration of 'right-way' fire management practices and knowledge of the landscape and waterways.
Queensland is also working to improve co-stewardship with First Nations People consistent with the Gurra Gurra Framework (DES, 2020). Each of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service branch has a regional advisory committee and three of those committees cover the Gondwana Rainforests reserves. NPWS also has an Aboriginal Consultative Committee for Wollumbin National Park and three native title Indigenous Land Use Agreements with the Githabul, Widjabul wia-bul and Western Bundjalung peoples which covers joint management of 11 Gondwana Rainforests listed reserves in NSW. Queensland has management plans or statements for all Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service reserves. All NSW parks have a Plan of Management (POM) (Statutory Planning Instrument) to direct park management actions. The renewal of the management plans involves public consultation, including input from the NSW relevant NPWS regional advisory committees and joint management partners.
Engagement with other local communities and land managers is pursued through NRM bodies in Queensland and Local Land Services in NSW where the community has representation on the local boards of management and where the programs support and inform compatible land management and recovery, compulsory pest and weed control, regional water management and general resource and land use planning. In NSW, the Biodiversity Conservation Trust (BCT) provides a framework for building voluntary conservation agreements with private land holders, establishing stewardship milestones with monitoring of progress and benefits and forming learning networks of land mangers across the landscape. The board of the BCT includes agriculturalists and other private land managers.
To inform the strategic management of its World Heritage properties and to find ways to work more effectively with Aboriginal peoples to protect their cultural heritage, NPWS has undertaken extensive consultation with the six Aboriginal language groups across the Greater Blue Mountains Area, and the three Traditional Tribal Groups within The Willandra Lakes Region with lessons that could be transferred to other parts of the world heritage estate and national parks if resources become available.
There are several advisory groups which provide input into the management of the site and volunteer groups undertake a variety of work in partnership with the managing agencies. Managing agencies are currently enhancing efforts to consult with, and better involve First Nations people in the management and governance of the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). However, while there is involvement of Aboriginal representatives on the various advisory committees and at least four Aboriginal communities that have formal agreements in place with NSW NPWS across the property, there is a recognised need for greater involvement of Aboriginal peoples (IUCN Consultation, 2020b) and to find new ways for improve "two-way learning". At all levels of government there is an increased investment in Indigenous ranges deployed through Commonwealth government, State governments, local governments and NRM bodies with a view to improving integration of 'right-way' fire management practices and knowledge of the landscape and waterways.
Queensland is also working to improve co-stewardship with First Nations People consistent with the Gurra Gurra Framework (DES, 2020). Each of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service branch has a regional advisory committee and three of those committees cover the Gondwana Rainforests reserves. NPWS also has an Aboriginal Consultative Committee for Wollumbin National Park and three native title Indigenous Land Use Agreements with the Githabul, Widjabul wia-bul and Western Bundjalung peoples which covers joint management of 11 Gondwana Rainforests listed reserves in NSW. Queensland has management plans or statements for all Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service reserves. All NSW parks have a Plan of Management (POM) (Statutory Planning Instrument) to direct park management actions. The renewal of the management plans involves public consultation, including input from the NSW relevant NPWS regional advisory committees and joint management partners.
Engagement with other local communities and land managers is pursued through NRM bodies in Queensland and Local Land Services in NSW where the community has representation on the local boards of management and where the programs support and inform compatible land management and recovery, compulsory pest and weed control, regional water management and general resource and land use planning. In NSW, the Biodiversity Conservation Trust (BCT) provides a framework for building voluntary conservation agreements with private land holders, establishing stewardship milestones with monitoring of progress and benefits and forming learning networks of land mangers across the landscape. The board of the BCT includes agriculturalists and other private land managers.
Legal framework
Most of the World Heritage site lies within national park boundaries. National environmental law (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999), as well as various state laws e.g. Nature Conservation Act 1992 (QLD); National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW); Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW); Planning Act 2016 (QLD); Environmental Protection Act 1994 (QLD); Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (QLD), protect the World Heritage site from threats originating both inside and outside its boundaries (Feros, 2009; World Heritage Committee, 2012).
Governance arrangements
The model for cooperative management of the protected areas and the wider landscape is both hierarchical (in terms of responsibility to legislation and reporting on the values) and 'poly-centric' (in terms of on-ground management of the surrounding land use). This means that there is a strongly coordinated effort between Queensland and NSW governments and the Commonwealth for the World Heritage area, between state governments for the relevant national parks and some collaboration between regional NRM bodies (Southern Queensland Landscapes and Healthy Land and Water in Queensland and North Coast LLS, Northern Tablelands LLS and Hunter LLS in NSW), relevant local government authorities and various statutory bodies, each having different responsibilities for planning, managing landscapes and water and for enabling private land conservation. The Biodiversity Conservation Trust manages this in NSW and the Queensland government engages land holders through its Biodiversity Conservation Strategy. However, as mentioned above, there is a need to engage more effectively with the First Nations people across the Gondwana estates and integrate their perspectives, culture connection and knowledge systems into management.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
There is a strongly coordinated effort between Queensland and NSW governments and the Commonwealth for the World Heritage area, between state governments for the relevant national parks and some collaboration between regional NRM bodies (Southern Queensland Landscapes and Healthy Land and Water in Queensland and North Coast LLS, Northern Tablelands LLS and Hunter LLS in NSW), relevant local government authorities and various statutory bodies, each having different responsibilities for planning, managing landscapes and water and for enabling private land conservation. The Biodiversity Conservation Trust manages this in NSW and the Queensland government engages land holders through its Biodiversity Conservation Strategy.
The Greater Eastern Range Initiative (GER Ltd an independent non-profit) provides a framework and collaborative network and an active vision for achieving connectivity and conservation across 3600 km of the eastern ranges across three states from Southern Victoria to Cape York in Queensland (GER Annual Report, 2023). It began in 2007 as an initiative and has since become a network of more than 250 environmental non-profits, Landcare and community groups, government agencies, First Nations organisations and research partners. It has developed with support from the NSW Environmental Trust along with donations, project grants and sponsorships. Major investment comes in the form of the large volunteer workforce and citizen science program that monitor environmental condition and the impact of their work.
The Greater Eastern Range Initiative (GER Ltd an independent non-profit) provides a framework and collaborative network and an active vision for achieving connectivity and conservation across 3600 km of the eastern ranges across three states from Southern Victoria to Cape York in Queensland (GER Annual Report, 2023). It began in 2007 as an initiative and has since become a network of more than 250 environmental non-profits, Landcare and community groups, government agencies, First Nations organisations and research partners. It has developed with support from the NSW Environmental Trust along with donations, project grants and sponsorships. Major investment comes in the form of the large volunteer workforce and citizen science program that monitor environmental condition and the impact of their work.
Boundaries
Since inscription there have been major tenure changes, with flora reserves that were previously managed by forestry revoked and incorporated into new or existing national parks and nature reserves. Whilst the boundaries of the World Heritage site have not changed, the boundaries of several of the reserves within the site have been changed. This has led to enhanced protection of the site (State Party of Australia, 2003). There have also been major expansions of the protected areas in both New South Wales and Queensland, including significant additional areas of rainforest that could be added to the World Heritage site in the future (Feros, 2009). Potential extension of the World Heritage site has been discussed and was added to the Australia's Tentative List in 2010. An extension of the site may help improve the connectivity between different components and will reduce edge effects and provide more resilience for the OUV of the site. The importance of providing interconnection among some of the isolated components and a buffer zone to enable more effective and targeted asset management is demonstrated by the wildfires of 2019-2020 that affected many of the components and large areas of surrounding forested lands. Interconnection would provide for greater protection of the Outstanding Universal Value, by providing a security for migration routes at times of wildfire and as means to recolonize following fire (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). As well as expanding the formal boundaries of each site there is a need to focus on connectivity across privately owned landscapes by encouraging compatible land management, restoration and conservation zones on private lands. The 'Nature Positive Policies' of the Australian Government encourage and support this action that needs to be strategic and rewarding for private land holders. The BCT in NSW provides some of this support and the GER Initiative provides a network of volunteers and willing land managers. To work in the long term the concept requires investment and marketing to land holders along with strategic goals and monitoring of the outcomes.
Overlapping international designations
not relevant
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
The State Party has addressed or is in the process of addressing recent Committee decisions and recommendations including regarding information on bushfire extent, impact and monitoring, and management actions, monitoring of Myrtle rust, developing adaptive strategies against climate change and regarding water extraction. On all points the State Party has provided responses and is initiating management actions on the ground. Furthermore, key strategies have been developed including threatened species recovery plans, the Myrtle rust working group, and climate change adaptation plans to address key threats (State Party of Australia, 2024).
Climate action
The NSW Government has legislated whole-of-government climate action in the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 (NSW). As committed under Stage 1 of the implementation plan for the Act, NSW NPWS has prepared a Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Statement, which sets out the economic, financial and physical impacts, risks and opportunities of climate change and planned future priorities for NPWS operations. World Heritage is listed as a priority in the TCFD along with sites impacted by the 2019–20 bushfires, the 2021–22 floods, and AIS (Assets of Intergenerational Significance) sites. Additionally, the Australian Government is investing AUD$27.4 million over 2 years to deliver a National Climate Risk Assessment and National Adaptation Plan. The National Adaptation Plan will establish a framework for adapting to nationally significant, physical climate risks identified in the risk assessment. NSW NPWS has developed the NSW National Parks Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, which applies adaptation pathways to identify proactive solutions to protect key park values. The plan identifies actions to protect climate refugia, genetically rescue populations at risk and support the transition of habitats to maximise the conservation of biodiversity. Actions include fire management strategies to enhance protection of biodiverse climate refugia and establishing additional populations of native species in lower risk locations. The NSW Government is also delivering Aboriginal climate change adaptation programs and working cooperatively with First Nations land managers to make proactive and informed decisions about how to respond to climate change impacts, both now and into the future. NSW climate planning is guided by the AdaptNSW online hub, which has recently released updated climate projections (State Party of Australia, 2024).
The Australian Government National Environment Science Program (NESP) is funding a project to develop a climate change adaptation plan for culturally significant entities, threatened species and ecosystems of the Northern Rivers region in NSW which includes several of the Gondwana Rainforests reserves.
Queensland is developing a plan to understand the risks and impacts of climate change on its heritage places. The plan will be based on consultation with those who own, manage, and protect heritage-listed places provides a framework to ensure Queensland becomes more climate resilient and manages the risks associated with a changing climate. The plan aims to more fully engage with First Nations including regarding their custodial roles, knowledge and landscape management practices (Queensland Climate Adaptation Strategy 2017-2030).
The Australian Government National Environment Science Program (NESP) is funding a project to develop a climate change adaptation plan for culturally significant entities, threatened species and ecosystems of the Northern Rivers region in NSW which includes several of the Gondwana Rainforests reserves.
Queensland is developing a plan to understand the risks and impacts of climate change on its heritage places. The plan will be based on consultation with those who own, manage, and protect heritage-listed places provides a framework to ensure Queensland becomes more climate resilient and manages the risks associated with a changing climate. The plan aims to more fully engage with First Nations including regarding their custodial roles, knowledge and landscape management practices (Queensland Climate Adaptation Strategy 2017-2030).
Management plan and overall management system
This is a serial World Heritage site comprising 41 reserves which are located in the states of New South Wales and Queensland (World Heritage Committee, 2012). The Australian Government funds two project officers, one in NSW and one in Qld, as well as an advisory committee in Qld, which provides community input and technical and scientific advice to the Qld management agencies. The project officers also provide secretariat support for the management committees to support coordination between the managing agencies. An overarching Strategic Overview for Management is in place for the entire serial World Heritage site (Commonwealth of Australia, 2000). The Queensland, NSW and Australian governments are working together to review and update the Strategic Plan for the site (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). There are management plans or statements for each of the reserves in NSW, including the Dorrigo National Park, Bindarri National Park and Bindarri State Conservation Area Plan of Management, updated and adopted in June 2024. Fire, pest and visitor strategies currently exist or are being developed, for most of the protected areas within the World Heritage site.
The NSW Independent Inquiry into the 2019-2020 Bushfires highlighted the need to improve ways to identify and protect priority assets, including environmental and cultural assets, well in advance of bushfire or other emergency events.
The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 was amended to enable the NSW Minister for the Environment and Heritage to declare land in the national parks reserve system as an environmental or cultural asset of intergenerational significance (AIS). AIS declarations are focused on enhancing the protection of threatened species habitat. NPWS continues to declare land with exceptional environment value as AIS. As of April 2024, there were 43 AIS sites for 24 species, spanning 48,000 hectares within the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia. These identified AIS locations are explicitly considered in the new generation of bush fire risk management plans. NPWS has been undertaking a project to raise awareness and foster greater public appreciation for selected AIS through interpretation.
The NSW Independent Inquiry into the 2019-2020 Bushfires highlighted the need to improve ways to identify and protect priority assets, including environmental and cultural assets, well in advance of bushfire or other emergency events.
The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 was amended to enable the NSW Minister for the Environment and Heritage to declare land in the national parks reserve system as an environmental or cultural asset of intergenerational significance (AIS). AIS declarations are focused on enhancing the protection of threatened species habitat. NPWS continues to declare land with exceptional environment value as AIS. As of April 2024, there were 43 AIS sites for 24 species, spanning 48,000 hectares within the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia. These identified AIS locations are explicitly considered in the new generation of bush fire risk management plans. NPWS has been undertaking a project to raise awareness and foster greater public appreciation for selected AIS through interpretation.
Law enforcement
Overall, enforcement of existing laws and regulations is highly effective.
Sustainable finance
Funding is largely the responsibility of the state management agencies. The Australian Government funds a Gondwana Rainforests project officer in NSW and one in Qld and provides funding for a community and scientific advisory committee in Qld. Funding is provided by managing agencies to address priority issues, but some threatening processes are not able to be adequately addressed. Some examples include weed and pest control, rehabilitation of degraded areas and systematic monitoring and research (State Party of Australia, 2003) as well as monitoring of threatened species managed under the NSW Saving our Species program and the Queensland Threatened Species Program. The Australian Government (Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water) has funded several studies that investigate threats to specific attributes of the Outstanding Universal Value of the site. These have included the threat of the invasive pathogen that causes the disease chytridiomycosis in amphibians, and the impacts of climate change on mountain frogs. A significant study supported by the National Environmental Science Program (NESP) combining the expertise of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO with ecologists from the Queensland Herbarium has investigated the role of climate change on cloud levels (Narsey et al., 2020).
Staff capacity, training and development
Park management staff in NSW and Queensland are professional, highly qualified and highly motivated. There are programs to ensure equal employment opportunities and access to appropriate training. However, additional human resources would further support consistent best-practice management (State Party of Australia, 2021).
Staff in the managing agencies in NSW and Queensland are highly trained and have development plans in place, with the managing agencies offering ongoing staff training and development. Rangers and program specialist staff are generally qualified and highly skilled with many being fire trained and competent in fire management. Field officers are trained in necessary skills to carry out park management and maintenance. Specific training in biosecurity and the identification of Myrtle rust and Phytophthora spp. are in planning, along with workshops to develop adaptation pathways under changing climate (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). The protected areas that make-up the World Heritage site are all managed by professional park management and conservation professionals within government departments that are responsible for national park management in the respective states. The departments have park management staff that are responsible at the local level for park management activities. These staff are supported by functional divisions that deal with major issues such as common threats (fire, pests and weeds), the community, media and communication. Each of the parks in NSW, and most of those in Queensland has a statutory Plan of Management which is supported by thematic plans that deal with threat management. One of the on-going developments is to improve engagement of First Nations Peoples in consultation and active management. Parts of several of reserves that make up the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage site have established Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUA), where the objective is to involve First Nations Peoples in management, including employment (IUCN Consultation, 2020b).
Staff in the managing agencies in NSW and Queensland are highly trained and have development plans in place, with the managing agencies offering ongoing staff training and development. Rangers and program specialist staff are generally qualified and highly skilled with many being fire trained and competent in fire management. Field officers are trained in necessary skills to carry out park management and maintenance. Specific training in biosecurity and the identification of Myrtle rust and Phytophthora spp. are in planning, along with workshops to develop adaptation pathways under changing climate (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). The protected areas that make-up the World Heritage site are all managed by professional park management and conservation professionals within government departments that are responsible for national park management in the respective states. The departments have park management staff that are responsible at the local level for park management activities. These staff are supported by functional divisions that deal with major issues such as common threats (fire, pests and weeds), the community, media and communication. Each of the parks in NSW, and most of those in Queensland has a statutory Plan of Management which is supported by thematic plans that deal with threat management. One of the on-going developments is to improve engagement of First Nations Peoples in consultation and active management. Parts of several of reserves that make up the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage site have established Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUA), where the objective is to involve First Nations Peoples in management, including employment (IUCN Consultation, 2020b).
Education and interpretation programmes
Awareness and understanding of the property is consistently increasing as activities are delivered which celebrate the Outstanding Universal Value of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
A Teacher’s Kit has been developed which raises awareness of the values of rainforests, including their recognition in World Heritage inscription. Park agencies have expertise in interpretation planning and delivery (including web-based and on-park products such as signs and exhibits) and there are many examples of good interpretation across the World Heritage site. However, further resources devoted to interpretation planning at a whole-of-site level, with clear articulation of target audiences and desired outcomes would further strengthen education and interpretation (i.e. enhancing visitor and community/stakeholder awareness and understanding of the sites' Outstanding Universal Value) (IUCN Consultation, 2020b).
In 2020-2024, the Australian and NSW governments funded interpretation projects to provide improved educational and interpretative signage and facilities for visitors and education groups across the NSW reserves of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
A Teacher’s Kit has been developed which raises awareness of the values of rainforests, including their recognition in World Heritage inscription. Park agencies have expertise in interpretation planning and delivery (including web-based and on-park products such as signs and exhibits) and there are many examples of good interpretation across the World Heritage site. However, further resources devoted to interpretation planning at a whole-of-site level, with clear articulation of target audiences and desired outcomes would further strengthen education and interpretation (i.e. enhancing visitor and community/stakeholder awareness and understanding of the sites' Outstanding Universal Value) (IUCN Consultation, 2020b).
In 2020-2024, the Australian and NSW governments funded interpretation projects to provide improved educational and interpretative signage and facilities for visitors and education groups across the NSW reserves of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Tourism and visitation management
Park management agencies have a good understanding of the numbers and trends in visitation across the components comprising the World Heritage site, especially at a macro/park level (less so at micro level e.g. specific attractions and experiences). Park agencies are also proficient at developing and delivering marketing campaigns that showcase World Heritage values and that attract visitors to the site based on these values. However, there is limited understanding of the impacts of increasing visitation and tourism development, both at a whole-of-site and at a nuanced level such as the impacts of varying types of visitor experiences and variation across the World Heritage site. High standards of visitor management require greater monitoring and measurement of the impacts of visitor behaviour on a range of ecological and cultural variables that capture World Heritage values. This monitoring of impacts would enable a more informed approach to setting visitor limits, restricting certain activities, and regulating development (IUCN Consultation, 2020b).
Several of the NSW reserves within the World Heritage property generate revenue from park user fees and campground fees. These funds are re-invested into park management. Local and regional economies benefit from World-Heritage-driven tourism across the property; from Barrington Tops in the south of the property, through the tourism destinations of the NSW North Coast and NSW Northern Inland and into the iconic parks of southeast Queensland (State Party of Australia, 2021).
Several of the NSW reserves within the World Heritage property generate revenue from park user fees and campground fees. These funds are re-invested into park management. Local and regional economies benefit from World-Heritage-driven tourism across the property; from Barrington Tops in the south of the property, through the tourism destinations of the NSW North Coast and NSW Northern Inland and into the iconic parks of southeast Queensland (State Party of Australia, 2021).
Sustainable use
No reosurce use is allowed within the site, as the vast majority lies within national parks. Tourism constitutes one of the use options and is discussed above. In the adjacent areas there are activities such as forestry, water extraction, mining, agriculture, tourism and urban development, all of which should be managed sustainably. World Heritage is protected under the EPBC Act as a Matter of National Environmental Significance requiring assessment of the significance of impact on World Heritage values of activities whether within or outside the property. Information is needed on the strategies used by authorities to ensure sustainability, low impact activities on the boundaries and where possible ensure positive impacts for conservation on the basis that the benefits are naturally shared.
Monitoring
Despite the publication of a monitoring strategy (Chester and Bushnell, 2005), there continues to be no overall coordinated monitoring program for the entire World Heritage site. Part of the challenge is obtaining agreement on indicators that are cost-effective in capturing changes to the attributes of Outstanding Universal Value across the considerable extent of the components comprising the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). There are insufficient resources to implement a coordinated monitoring program. The agencies are actively working on pilot schemes in several components to address this issue. Some developments include:
- A recent major revision to the classification of Plant Community Types of eastern NSW has established a new framework and typology (stored NSW BioNet - see https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/biodiversity/nsw-bionet)
- Plant Community Type Mapping is in development in New South Wales and Regional Ecosystems are mapped in Queensland. Efforts to coordinate mapping across the World Heritage site continue. Further work is required to link the values of the site to vegetation communities. Trials to develop an overall coordinated monitoring program for the site are in development. There are a number of reserve-specific projects being undertaken which provide some baseline and trend data for plant communities or individual species and their threats. Examples of these include visitation indicators; species-specific projects; threatening processes (particularly climate change, fire, weeds and pest species); and ‘state of the parks’ reporting (IUCN Consultation, 2020a).
- The Ecological Health Performance Scorecards (EcoHealth Program) aims to enhance the health of NSW national parks by tracking key ecological indicators and using that data to refine management actions. On-ground monitoring data and park management actions will be used to develop scorecards, providing annual snapshots of what is happening with native plants and animals, important ecological processes, and threats to ecological health, such as feral animals and weeds. The data will be used for park evaluations and reserve planning to guide adaptive decision-making and increase transparency and trust in management of the NSW national parks system in the face of climate change. One of the pilot regions included as part of this project includes much of the Hastings Macleay group of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia. Extensive monitoring of the site has commenced and the first report card for the area is expected to be published in 2025. In Queensland, key value health checks (part of a state-wide system instituted by QPWS&P) (Melzer et.al. 2019) are regularly undertaken as part of VBMF park management and according to monitoring and research strategies for each of the 5 Queensland Gondwana Rainforest WH protected areas.
Monitoring and conservation plans developed for this region will be used to inform management across the national parks. Further scorecard regions may be identified in the future, and monitoring plans can be designed to measure outcomes identified as high priority in each region (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
- A recent major revision to the classification of Plant Community Types of eastern NSW has established a new framework and typology (stored NSW BioNet - see https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/biodiversity/nsw-bionet)
- Plant Community Type Mapping is in development in New South Wales and Regional Ecosystems are mapped in Queensland. Efforts to coordinate mapping across the World Heritage site continue. Further work is required to link the values of the site to vegetation communities. Trials to develop an overall coordinated monitoring program for the site are in development. There are a number of reserve-specific projects being undertaken which provide some baseline and trend data for plant communities or individual species and their threats. Examples of these include visitation indicators; species-specific projects; threatening processes (particularly climate change, fire, weeds and pest species); and ‘state of the parks’ reporting (IUCN Consultation, 2020a).
- The Ecological Health Performance Scorecards (EcoHealth Program) aims to enhance the health of NSW national parks by tracking key ecological indicators and using that data to refine management actions. On-ground monitoring data and park management actions will be used to develop scorecards, providing annual snapshots of what is happening with native plants and animals, important ecological processes, and threats to ecological health, such as feral animals and weeds. The data will be used for park evaluations and reserve planning to guide adaptive decision-making and increase transparency and trust in management of the NSW national parks system in the face of climate change. One of the pilot regions included as part of this project includes much of the Hastings Macleay group of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia. Extensive monitoring of the site has commenced and the first report card for the area is expected to be published in 2025. In Queensland, key value health checks (part of a state-wide system instituted by QPWS&P) (Melzer et.al. 2019) are regularly undertaken as part of VBMF park management and according to monitoring and research strategies for each of the 5 Queensland Gondwana Rainforest WH protected areas.
Monitoring and conservation plans developed for this region will be used to inform management across the national parks. Further scorecard regions may be identified in the future, and monitoring plans can be designed to measure outcomes identified as high priority in each region (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Research
Each year there are numerous scientific and technical studies undertaken in the World Heritage site, particularly in relation to threatened species conservation, and pest species and fire management. New discoveries continue to take place. Several focused monitoring/research programs have been undertaken. These include surveys of the distribution of Phytophthora cinnamomi and the amphibian chytrid fungus, and the potential impact of climate change on high altitude vertebrate populations. Another example of strategic research is a current high level research project investigating the impact of climate change on cloud layer elevation and moisture acquisition by upland rainforest plant communities. This investigation involves the collaboration of the Australia Bureau of Meteorology, the Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation and the Queensland Herbarium, funded by the National Environment Science Program (Narsey et al. 2020). There is a need for a detailed inventory of research and an identification of research priorities to support the management and protection of the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020a).
The development of a comprehensive and integrated programme is challenging due in large part to the Gondwana Rainforests being a serial property with several reserves in both NSW and Queensland. Each managing agency has processes to identify and deliver on research priorities. Improvements are needed to ensure these programmes deliver the information needed for continuing effective management of World Heritage values (State Party of Australia, 2021).
The development of a comprehensive and integrated programme is challenging due in large part to the Gondwana Rainforests being a serial property with several reserves in both NSW and Queensland. Each managing agency has processes to identify and deliver on research priorities. Improvements are needed to ensure these programmes deliver the information needed for continuing effective management of World Heritage values (State Party of Australia, 2021).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
More information is required to understand protection and management outside the site (see sections on sustainable use and boundaries). In many of the reserves it appears that they are buffered by additional protected areas, but not all of them. Many of the adjacent areas are managed as national parks and state forests. There is a relatively high level of threat management in these areas. Environmental law in Australia has a strong approach to threat management, and there is acknowledgment that good land management on private and public land requires integrated management, whether that be for pest or fire. This aspect could be further improved (Kooyman et al., 2020), and this is a consistent challenge for all land managers especially in the face of climate change predictions.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Protection and management of the World Heritage site appears to be mostly effective with growing collaboration efforts in surrounding landscapes with the increasing need to collaborate with adjacent land managers to reduce threats and boost connectivity wherever possible. The New South Wales and Queensland governments collaborate on planning and management of the sites and on efforts to improve connectivity and reduce threats along the extensive borders of the fragmented site. Given that the Gondwana Rainforests (GRA) are comprised of a series of 41 component parts, it has been questioned whether all the component parts are adequately buffered and as connected as possible. The GRA (extension to the existing World Heritage site) is on Australia’s Tentative List. Extending the site would support enhanced connectivity and better protection of its Outstanding Universal Value. While management has so far been effective in addressing main challenges, additional resources to support further management responses will be required to address the ongoing decline in key values and potentially increasing threats, particularly those posed by wildfire, invasive species and pathogens, climate change and adjacent land use. Some non-government projects such and the Greater Eastern Ranges Initiative (GER) target the restoration of critical connectivity and creation of habitat corridors across the landscape so that conservation and adaptation to climate change can occur at relevant scales.
Although not conducted at the scale of the entire World Heritage site, management effectiveness for component parts was monitored every 3-5 years through the State of the Parks Report for reserves in both NSW and Queensland from 2010 until 2018 (IUCN Consultation, 2017). NSW and Queensland apply a range of different monitoring methods to monitor the status and trend of key values. There a need for closer alignment of protected area management between Queensland and NSW with monitoring and research focused on resolving questions of approaches to management of fire in particular; however, the management issues and pressures differ between reserves and different management approaches are needed in each location (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). The management agencies (the two state agencies) have commissioned studies to develop monitoring strategies that will advise adaptive management actions. These studies are well founded, however, the capacity to manage the Outstanding Universal Value within the landscape provides a scientific and functional challenge. There are numerous studies conducted by research organisations (Universities, State Herbaria, CSIRO, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, National Environmental Science Program, Non-government organisations, e.g. BirdLife Australia), that provide detailed scientific information on the evolutionary ecology and threats posed. Nonetheless, the challenge to have a good understanding of major ecosystem processes remains. Evidence of this can be seen in the climate change driven wildfires of 2019-2020. These fires were predicted, but actions to halt or manage them were generally beyond resources or capacity (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). Lamington National Park is listed on the IUCN Green List (admitted in 2024) and is managed as the international effective and equitable standard demonstrating good governance, sound design and planning, effective management, resulting in successful conservation outcomes (Hockings et.al 2019; WCPA 2025).
Although not conducted at the scale of the entire World Heritage site, management effectiveness for component parts was monitored every 3-5 years through the State of the Parks Report for reserves in both NSW and Queensland from 2010 until 2018 (IUCN Consultation, 2017). NSW and Queensland apply a range of different monitoring methods to monitor the status and trend of key values. There a need for closer alignment of protected area management between Queensland and NSW with monitoring and research focused on resolving questions of approaches to management of fire in particular; however, the management issues and pressures differ between reserves and different management approaches are needed in each location (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). The management agencies (the two state agencies) have commissioned studies to develop monitoring strategies that will advise adaptive management actions. These studies are well founded, however, the capacity to manage the Outstanding Universal Value within the landscape provides a scientific and functional challenge. There are numerous studies conducted by research organisations (Universities, State Herbaria, CSIRO, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, National Environmental Science Program, Non-government organisations, e.g. BirdLife Australia), that provide detailed scientific information on the evolutionary ecology and threats posed. Nonetheless, the challenge to have a good understanding of major ecosystem processes remains. Evidence of this can be seen in the climate change driven wildfires of 2019-2020. These fires were predicted, but actions to halt or manage them were generally beyond resources or capacity (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). Lamington National Park is listed on the IUCN Green List (admitted in 2024) and is managed as the international effective and equitable standard demonstrating good governance, sound design and planning, effective management, resulting in successful conservation outcomes (Hockings et.al 2019; WCPA 2025).
Protection and management of the World Heritage site appears to be mostly effective with growing collaboration efforts in surrounding landscapes, including with adjacent land mangers to reduce threats and boost connectivity wherever possible. Some projects such as the Greater Eastern Ranges Initiative (GER) target the restoration of critical connectivity and creation of habitat corridors across the landscape so that conservation and adaptation to climate change can occur at relevant scales. Given that the Gondwana Rainforests is comprised of a series of 41 component parts, it has been questioned whether all the component parts are adequately buffered and as connected as possible. The extension to the existing World Heritage site is on Australia’s Tentative List. Extending the site could support enhanced connectivity and better protection of its Outstanding Universal Value. While management has so far been effective in addressing main challenges, additional resources to support further management responses will be required to address the ongoing decline in key values and potentially increasing threats, particularly those posed by wildfire, invasive species and pathogens, climate change and adjacent land use.
Outstanding examples of significant ongoing geological processes
Good
Trend
Stable
There are no reports of any significant damage to the reserves in which these geological processes are occurring (State Party of Australia, 2003). New studies interpreting the role of geological processes are published periodically (Cohen et al., 2012).
Outstanding examples of relict plant species
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The level of botanical knowledge, particularly in terms of taxonomy and ecology of the plant communities (distribution and abundance) is generally high (Crisp et al., 2001; 2013; Laidlaw et al., 2011, 2016; Downing et al., 2014; Kooyman et al., 2014). There has been a long history of mapping plant communities and botanists in Queensland and NSW have detailed knowledge of the distribution of relict communities. There is a recognised need for a consistent approach to mapping. There is also a recognised need for studies of the processes that drive community distribution and composition, especially in the light of climate change scenarios. Considerable concern has been raised by botanists due to several threatening processes, including invasive weeds, pathogens and climate change. Two invasive pathogens, phytophora and myrtle rust (Bishop et al., 2012; Scarlett et al., 2015), are of great concern and require intensive and extensive research and field work program to assess impacts and develop effective response actions. Climate change is also a major concern since increased temperature, reduced rainfall and humidity over long periods that result in drought conditions increase physiological stress on individuals, and catastrophic events such as wild fires (Laidlaw et al., 2016; 2022). Species from the World Heritage site, including Lenwebbia sp. Main Range, Rhodamnia rubescens and Rhodomyrtus psidioides are listed under the NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act and Qld Nature Conservation Act 1992 as Critically Endangered due to myrtle rust (TSSC, 2019 and 2020).
Outstanding examples of relict and other vertebrate and invertebrate species
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
There are concerns for the status of several species that are considered as relicts. The Rufous Scrub-bird occurs in a series of high-altitude relict populations and there are concerns that it may be impacted by rising temperatures and/or other effects of climate change such as periodic drought, and in recent years wildfire. Targeted field surveys are conducted to understand causes of decline. A recovery program has been approved, however not all actions are funded. A component of the program includes captive breeding and re-introduction. Concern has been raised for the status of the Black-tailed Dusky Antechinus (a small dasyurid marsupial), which is a newly recognised species that is confined to upland habitats in the Tweed Caldera region of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia WHA (Baker et al., 2014; Riordan et al., 2020). This marsupial has been listed as 'endangered' under Australian legislation (Threatened Species Committee, 2018). Active research is underway to understand the ecology and distribution. The numbers of observations are low and restricted to higher altitudes and the postulate is that they are sensitive to climatic change. Considerable research work has been undertaken on several species of upland frogs that form part of the Outstanding Universal Value of the site. Unfortunately, species distribution modelling has shown that these frogs are likely to be highly susceptible to climate warming and future prospects for the persistence of the species, especially for some of the small isolated remnants, are dire (Keith et al., 2014; Willacy et al., 2018; Lopez, 2015). There are indications of recovery in the population number and abundance of one threatened species of frog (Mixophyes fleayi), which appears to be related to adaptation to dealing with the amphibian disease chytridiomycosis (Newell et al., 2013, Quick et al., 2015). The broader pattern of climate warming impacts have been investigated (ANU, 2009; Hagger et al., 2013), and specific studies are underway to understand the impact of specific community and species components.
Outstanding examples of ongoing evolutionary processes
High Concern
Trend
Stable
Climate change, intense wildfires and invasive pests may be leading to local extirpation of disjunct and genetically divergent populations of species such as mountain frogs (Kyarranus/Philoria) (IUCN Consultation, 2017).
The occurrence of intense wildfire in the Austral summer of 2019-2020 witness the predicted concerns of previous assessments.
The occurrence of intense wildfire in the Austral summer of 2019-2020 witness the predicted concerns of previous assessments.
Endemic and threatened plants
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
1625 plant taxa (170 threatened) were listed in the nomination and many of these are on the EPBC list of threatened flora. Lenwebbia sp. Main Range, Rhodamnia rubescens and Rhodomyrtus psidioides are listed in NSW as Critically Endangered due to Myrtle Rust (2019 and 2020 Scientific Committee determinations | NSW Environment, Energy and Science). Several research studies have been undertaken to investigate the role of climate change on the distribution of upland plant communities which have been undertaken in the components of the site, and this work is ongoing (Kitching et al, 2011, Laidlaw et al, 2011, 2016). The impact of the 2019-2020 wildfires on threatened plant species is a matter that requires urgent attention. The federal and state government agencies responsible for conservation management are involved in extensive assessments of the impacts of the fires on threatened plants (DAWE, 2020; NSW DPIE, 2020). Response actions will need to be developed.
Botanical surveys have recently located 11 fern taxa not previously known in northern NSW. Several of these may represent novel species previously unknown to science. Eight of the fern species are more common further north in Australia and represent southerly range extensions. Two of the taxa are potentially undescribed novel species endemic to the Border Ranges. Antrophyum austroqueenslandicum represents a narrow range endemic to the Border Ranges that was previously described and named but had gone extinct from Queensland, only to be rediscovered at several sites in NSW (State Party of Australia, 2022).
Myrtle rust, caused by the fungus Austropuccinia psidii, impacts some species in the extremely large and mostly Gondwanic plant family, the Myrtaceae. Fensham and Radford-Smith (2021) predict the imminent extinction of 16 rainforest tree species in the wild due to myrtle rust within a generation. A further 20 species may be at risk, but further monitoring is required.
Botanical surveys have recently located 11 fern taxa not previously known in northern NSW. Several of these may represent novel species previously unknown to science. Eight of the fern species are more common further north in Australia and represent southerly range extensions. Two of the taxa are potentially undescribed novel species endemic to the Border Ranges. Antrophyum austroqueenslandicum represents a narrow range endemic to the Border Ranges that was previously described and named but had gone extinct from Queensland, only to be rediscovered at several sites in NSW (State Party of Australia, 2022).
Myrtle rust, caused by the fungus Austropuccinia psidii, impacts some species in the extremely large and mostly Gondwanic plant family, the Myrtaceae. Fensham and Radford-Smith (2021) predict the imminent extinction of 16 rainforest tree species in the wild due to myrtle rust within a generation. A further 20 species may be at risk, but further monitoring is required.
Endemic and threatened mammals
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
In addition to monitoring the conservation status of the 75 species of mammals listed as occurring in the site, it has been suggested that arboreal fauna, as well as rufous bettong (Aepyprymnus rufescens), broad-toothed rat (Mastacomys fuscus mordicus), black-tailed dusky antechinus (Antechinus arktos), spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) and Hastings River mouse serve as indicators (Chester and Bushnell, 2005). Species such as brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa), common planigale (Planigale maculata), common dunnart (Sminthopsis murina), short-eared brushtail possum (Trichosurus caninus), common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), feathertail glider (Acrobates pygmaeus), Eastern pygmy possum (Cercartetus nanus), greater glider (Petauroides volans), yellow-bellied glider (Petaurus australis), sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps), squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis), common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) have declined by 10% to 50% (Maxwell et al., 1996 in Chester and Bushnell, 2005). The Parma wallaby (Macropus parma) has been listed as Near Threatened (Lunney and McKenzie, 2008) and the koala has been listed in Australia as Endangered and by the IUCN as Vulnerable. Monitoring programs for key populations of some key species are continuing in Qld and NSW. The NSW Saving our Species program has actions identified for threatened species in NSW. These activities are prioritized and funded on a competitive basis and monitoring is undertaken as a part of these programs. Monitoring is also undertaken as part of threat management programs such as weed control.
Endemic and threatened birds
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Two subspecies of the rufous scrub-bird occur within the site. This species has been extensively studied and monitored. Birdlife International (2022) states that due to the impacts of drought and fire, the population of A. r. rufescens is estimated to have declined by 64% (49%–67%) in the last decade with declines greatest at Main Range (est. 2020 population: 2 birds; loss 86%) and Gibraltar Range (170, 82%); losses at Lamington (220, 30%) and in the Border Ranges (140, 29%) almost entirely a consequence of drought, so may be cyclic. The population of A. r. ferrieri is estimated to have declined by 56% (43%–60%) with losses greatest at Hasting Range (est. 2020 population 460, loss 74%), lower at Ebor/Dorrigo (550, 18%) and least at Barrington Tops (510, 2%). As a result, the best estimate is now 2,050 individuals for the species.
Therefore it appears that there has been a decline of this species within the site since inscription, although the protected areas where this species occurs are its last refuge.
The eastern bristlebird has also been divided into two subspecies. According to Birdlife International (2022b) the total population of D. b. brachypterus had previously been estimated at c.3,000 mature individuals, including 1,250 at Barren Grounds/Budderoo, 1,100 at Jervis Bay, 50 at Cataract, about ten at Red Rocks and 300 at Nadgee and Howe Flat with 140–160 birds at Howe Flat in 2020. An unknown number occur on the Beecroft Peninsula, but they are at all 40 monitoring sites established there. In 2020, 43 individual D. b. monoides were known to be alive in the wild, with another two sites having recent possible sightings, suggesting in total 45–46 birds were present. Of these, four were confirmed in Queensland and 39 confirmed in NSW. The total number of D. b. monoides is therefore thought to be 25-40 mature individuals, with a best estimate of 30. However, rapid declines in some populations have rendered some of these estimates no longer appropriate. Given a suspected decline of 30–49% of D. b. brachypterus reported at Barren Grounds/Budderoo and Nadgee/Howe Flat (but population stability at at least some other sites), the global population size is revised to 1,500-2,100 mature individuals, with a best estimate of 1,800.
While monitoring just three threatened species of the 270 present in the World Heritage site is not representative, these three species were identified at the time of nomination as exceptional for criteria (ix) and (x). Until it is demonstrated that their populations are at least stable or increasing within the World Heritage site, there is cause for concern.
Broader studies of the vulnerability of rainforest birds to deforestation and fragmentation have been reported (Pavlacky et al., 2015).
Therefore it appears that there has been a decline of this species within the site since inscription, although the protected areas where this species occurs are its last refuge.
The eastern bristlebird has also been divided into two subspecies. According to Birdlife International (2022b) the total population of D. b. brachypterus had previously been estimated at c.3,000 mature individuals, including 1,250 at Barren Grounds/Budderoo, 1,100 at Jervis Bay, 50 at Cataract, about ten at Red Rocks and 300 at Nadgee and Howe Flat with 140–160 birds at Howe Flat in 2020. An unknown number occur on the Beecroft Peninsula, but they are at all 40 monitoring sites established there. In 2020, 43 individual D. b. monoides were known to be alive in the wild, with another two sites having recent possible sightings, suggesting in total 45–46 birds were present. Of these, four were confirmed in Queensland and 39 confirmed in NSW. The total number of D. b. monoides is therefore thought to be 25-40 mature individuals, with a best estimate of 30. However, rapid declines in some populations have rendered some of these estimates no longer appropriate. Given a suspected decline of 30–49% of D. b. brachypterus reported at Barren Grounds/Budderoo and Nadgee/Howe Flat (but population stability at at least some other sites), the global population size is revised to 1,500-2,100 mature individuals, with a best estimate of 1,800.
While monitoring just three threatened species of the 270 present in the World Heritage site is not representative, these three species were identified at the time of nomination as exceptional for criteria (ix) and (x). Until it is demonstrated that their populations are at least stable or increasing within the World Heritage site, there is cause for concern.
Broader studies of the vulnerability of rainforest birds to deforestation and fragmentation have been reported (Pavlacky et al., 2015).
Endemic and threatened frogs
Critical
Trend
Deteriorating
New species continue to be identified in the World Heritage property including two new species of frogs.
A new species of frog endemic to Wollumbin National Park was described in 2021 (Mahoney et al, 2022). In consultation with First Nations Elders of the Wollumbin Consultative Group, it has been named Assa wollumbin sp. nov. after the First Nations name for its mountain habitat. Genetic research has also identified a new species of mountain frog known as Philoria knowlesi that was formerly thought to be Philoria loveridgei. Philoria knowlesi, is found in rainforest habitats at least 690 metres above sea level in northern NSW and south-eastern Queensland.
Forty five (45) species of frogs were listed at time of inscription with no special mention of threatened species. Today at least 11 of these species are listed as globally threatened and two Near Threatened (IUCN, 2012), with other reports of regional decline. Causes of decline are still unclear and may be due to several factors including loss of habitat due to feral animals, weed infestation, change in river flows due to upstream timber harvesting and urban development, fish predation, climate change and Chytrid infection (Hines et al., 2004; Hunter and Gillepsie, 2011). Chytrid infection has been implicated for species including Fleay’s barred-frog (Mixophyes fleayi), largely restricted to the World Heritage site and the giant barred frog (Mixophyes iteratus) (Ehmann, 1997; Berger et al. 1998; Hines et al., 1999; Hines and McDonald, 2000; Hines et al., 2002, 2004). A recovery plan (up to 2005) exists (Hines et al., 2002), as well as one for M. balbus (VU) (Gillepsie et al., 2004; Hunter and Gillepsie, 2011). A recovery plan for the Critically Endangered booroolong frog (Litoria booroolongensis) has also been published (Hero et al., 2004; OEH, 2012), as has a threat abatement plan for Amphibian chytrid fungus (DEC, 2011). Serious attention is being paid to this problem but until these amphibian populations stabilise or improve the threat to some amphibians in the World Heritage site must be viewed as critical.
However, there have also been observations of recovery of populations in one species, Fleayi's barred frog (Mixophyes fleayi) (Newell et al., 2013; Quick et al., 2015). The primary threat causing the previous rapid declines is considered to be the amphibian pathogen Chytrid (Scheele et al., 2019), and it is possible that there is now some dynamic balance between the disease and the persistence of the susceptible frog species. However, it is vital that ongoing monitoring and recovery actions are implemented. More recent studies have indicated that climate warming will be a threat to the persistence of several of the frog species (Hagger et al., 2013; Willacy et al., 2015).
A new species of frog endemic to Wollumbin National Park was described in 2021 (Mahoney et al, 2022). In consultation with First Nations Elders of the Wollumbin Consultative Group, it has been named Assa wollumbin sp. nov. after the First Nations name for its mountain habitat. Genetic research has also identified a new species of mountain frog known as Philoria knowlesi that was formerly thought to be Philoria loveridgei. Philoria knowlesi, is found in rainforest habitats at least 690 metres above sea level in northern NSW and south-eastern Queensland.
Forty five (45) species of frogs were listed at time of inscription with no special mention of threatened species. Today at least 11 of these species are listed as globally threatened and two Near Threatened (IUCN, 2012), with other reports of regional decline. Causes of decline are still unclear and may be due to several factors including loss of habitat due to feral animals, weed infestation, change in river flows due to upstream timber harvesting and urban development, fish predation, climate change and Chytrid infection (Hines et al., 2004; Hunter and Gillepsie, 2011). Chytrid infection has been implicated for species including Fleay’s barred-frog (Mixophyes fleayi), largely restricted to the World Heritage site and the giant barred frog (Mixophyes iteratus) (Ehmann, 1997; Berger et al. 1998; Hines et al., 1999; Hines and McDonald, 2000; Hines et al., 2002, 2004). A recovery plan (up to 2005) exists (Hines et al., 2002), as well as one for M. balbus (VU) (Gillepsie et al., 2004; Hunter and Gillepsie, 2011). A recovery plan for the Critically Endangered booroolong frog (Litoria booroolongensis) has also been published (Hero et al., 2004; OEH, 2012), as has a threat abatement plan for Amphibian chytrid fungus (DEC, 2011). Serious attention is being paid to this problem but until these amphibian populations stabilise or improve the threat to some amphibians in the World Heritage site must be viewed as critical.
However, there have also been observations of recovery of populations in one species, Fleayi's barred frog (Mixophyes fleayi) (Newell et al., 2013; Quick et al., 2015). The primary threat causing the previous rapid declines is considered to be the amphibian pathogen Chytrid (Scheele et al., 2019), and it is possible that there is now some dynamic balance between the disease and the persistence of the susceptible frog species. However, it is vital that ongoing monitoring and recovery actions are implemented. More recent studies have indicated that climate warming will be a threat to the persistence of several of the frog species (Hagger et al., 2013; Willacy et al., 2015).
Endemic and threatened reptiles
Data Deficient
Trend
Data Deficient
About 110 species of reptiles have been reported in the site. Of the 7 species reported to be mostly restricted to the World Heritage site, none are on the EPBC list. Two species listed as present in the site are listed on the EPBC list as VU (three-toed snake-tooth skink Coeranoscincus reticulatus and the collared delma Delma torquata). No reports of any significant increase in number of threatened reptile species occurring within the World Heritage site (State Party of Australia, 2003). Species with wide climatic distributions are likely to adapt to a moderate change in temperature. However, some species such as Tyron’s skink Karma tryoni and the beech skink Harrisoniascincus zia are only found above 800 m ASL, so may be affected by a moderate rise in temperature as their climatic envelope disappears off the top of the mountains (ANU, 2009).
Endangered ecological communities
High Concern
Trend
Improving
Many GRA ecological communities and their functional integrity were affected by fire with some direct impact through burning of rainforest for the first time or by the drought that preceded the fires or the floods that followed with the added impact of pathogens and invasive species (see threats described earlier).
The Gondwana Rainforests of Australia State of Conservation update (DCCEEW, 2020) provides a concerning profile where 53% of the site is being affected by bushfire (196,000 hectares). In Queensland the reserves most significantly impacted by the fires were Lamington, Mount Barney and Main Range National Parks. A very small area within Springbrook National Park was also impacted. Fires did not impact Mount Chingee National Park. In New South Wales, 16 of the 28 Gondwana Rainforests reserves were fire-affected, including Border Ranges, Koreelah Nightcap, Mount Clunie, Mount Nothofagus, Tooloom, Washpool, Gibraltar Range, New England, Oxley Wild Rivers, Werrikimbe, Willi Willi, Mount Royal and Barrington Tops national parks and Mount Hyland, The Castles and Mount Seaview nature reserves.
Longer term impacts will be known once on-ground monitoring has been completed. Existing mapping suggests some areas have not been subject to wildfire since the 1950s, so a reasonable assumption is that the 2019-2020 fire events may lead to new responses not previously documented. The combination of long-term drought (moisture deficiency) and extreme fire weather (high temperatures, strong winds, exceptionally low humidity) resulted in fire impacting on fire sensitive mesic forest types in a way not previously observed. Areas within several reserves experienced fire up to, and into, the rainforest margins, allowing remaining areas of unburnt rainforest to act as a refuge for fauna and some flora species.
Significant areas of fire sensitive subtropical and dry rainforests in Queensland were burnt with incursions into cooler, moister upland rainforests. Areas of warm temperate and cool temperate Nothofagus rainforests (iconic elements of the property’s OUV) were also burnt. Assessments of bushfire impacts on Araucaria cunninghamii rainforest (another element of the property’s OUV) is underway. Understanding the general and specific ecological impacts will be a focus of research, including monitoring recovery of affected ecological communities. There is a major concern that if another series of widespread catastrophic events should occur, the integrity of key ecological communities will be damaged beyond recovery, as the natural resilience of the system is not known.
The Gondwana Rainforests of Australia State of Conservation update (DCCEEW, 2020) provides a concerning profile where 53% of the site is being affected by bushfire (196,000 hectares). In Queensland the reserves most significantly impacted by the fires were Lamington, Mount Barney and Main Range National Parks. A very small area within Springbrook National Park was also impacted. Fires did not impact Mount Chingee National Park. In New South Wales, 16 of the 28 Gondwana Rainforests reserves were fire-affected, including Border Ranges, Koreelah Nightcap, Mount Clunie, Mount Nothofagus, Tooloom, Washpool, Gibraltar Range, New England, Oxley Wild Rivers, Werrikimbe, Willi Willi, Mount Royal and Barrington Tops national parks and Mount Hyland, The Castles and Mount Seaview nature reserves.
Longer term impacts will be known once on-ground monitoring has been completed. Existing mapping suggests some areas have not been subject to wildfire since the 1950s, so a reasonable assumption is that the 2019-2020 fire events may lead to new responses not previously documented. The combination of long-term drought (moisture deficiency) and extreme fire weather (high temperatures, strong winds, exceptionally low humidity) resulted in fire impacting on fire sensitive mesic forest types in a way not previously observed. Areas within several reserves experienced fire up to, and into, the rainforest margins, allowing remaining areas of unburnt rainforest to act as a refuge for fauna and some flora species.
Significant areas of fire sensitive subtropical and dry rainforests in Queensland were burnt with incursions into cooler, moister upland rainforests. Areas of warm temperate and cool temperate Nothofagus rainforests (iconic elements of the property’s OUV) were also burnt. Assessments of bushfire impacts on Araucaria cunninghamii rainforest (another element of the property’s OUV) is underway. Understanding the general and specific ecological impacts will be a focus of research, including monitoring recovery of affected ecological communities. There is a major concern that if another series of widespread catastrophic events should occur, the integrity of key ecological communities will be damaged beyond recovery, as the natural resilience of the system is not known.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
While the geological values appear stable, the trends for some threatened species are uncertain, despite recovery and action plans being developed. In 2021, the State Party submitted the Periodic Report for the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia assessed the state of conservation of the following attributes as ‘compromised’: Subtropical rainforest, Warm temperate rainforests, Cool temperate rainforests, Dry rainforests, Wet sclerophyll forests, Montane heathlands, Rocky outcrops, Littoral rainforests, Endemic, rare and threatened plants, Endemic, rare and threatened mammals, Endemic, rare and threatened birds, Endemic, rare and threatened frogs, Endemic, rare and threatened reptiles, Endemic, rare and threatened invertebrates. The attribute titled “remnants of shield volcanoes” was assessed as ‘preserved’. The greatest concern has been for amphibian species within the World Heritage site, although declines in indicator bird species and several plant species have also been reported. More comprehensive monitoring data, and analysis of this data, is needed for numerous species that contribute to the Outstanding Universal Value of the site. Wildfires demonstrated the vulnerability of the World Heritage values of the site to increased temperature, drought conditions and catastrophic events. In addition, invasive species, including pathogens, may be affecting natural ongoing evolutionary processes for some species and this trend is likely to increase. Although many biodiversity values are well conserved across the site, the situation in the Gondwana Rainforests is of concern for many species and ecological processes that constitute the site's Outstanding Universal Value.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important values
High Concern
Improving
There is a important shift in the policies and practices of government at all levels to recognise First Nations rights as custodians, their long and on-going connection to 'Country", their holistic approach to management of country that includes culture and knowledge that has been shared for thousands of generations through oral story telling. The changes are both formal through policies and legislation, and informal through collaborative projects and education programs of relevant staff and volunteers. At a local level there are examples of Indigenous groups working with government agencies to heal the land and recover endangers species using their knowledge of the landscape and how it responds to fire using 'right-way fire' or 'cultural burns' in targeted areas (e.g. "Grow, Harvest and Heal" program relating to recovery of and orchid at Barrington Tops - see projects). At a larger scale there is more engagement and with Indigenous custodians and strategies are co-designed to optimise the integration of knowledge and ensure appropriate recognition of culturally based Intellectual property. For example, the Biodiversity Conservation Trust of NSW has a Aboriginal Empowerment Strategy 2024-27 specifically designed at encouraging inspiring new ways to conserve habitat and species using the more holistic and landscape-level approach of local Indigenous groups. The Queensland government has developed a joint strategies with indigenous groups called the "Gurra Gurra Framework" (DES 2020). The Commonwealth government has invested in a significant expansion of the Indigenous rangers program to support an addition 1000 rangers and bring the total to nearly 3000 with $355million additional investment over four years (DPC, 2024). This will encourage additional support from the State government level for more cultural burning initiatives and specific support for women ranger with opportunities for them to share their gender based cultural knowledge. Nonetheless there is a long distance to travel to ensure shared benefits for healing country, tailored opportunities for (cultural, social and economic) for Indigenous custodian when relying on their knowledge and cultural practices. there is also a need to fully understand the values of the WHA to the Indigenous custodian through their lens and protect sites of particular significance and integrational value.
Additional information
Outdoor recreation and tourism
The site is a major destination for a large number of tourists. The Gondwana Rainforests include some of the most dramatic scenery in Australia, with landscapes dominated by striking vertical cliffs and precipitous waterfalls. One of the most spectacular is the convoluted gorge country of Oxley Wild Rivers National Park, which contains numerous dramatic waterfalls including the third tallest waterfall in Australia, Wollomombi Falls. This natural beauty has great aesthetic value. The Gondwana Rainforests also offers outstanding vistas from vantage points on ridges and escarpments, including Point Lookout and Best of All Lookout. The wild and rugged landscapes, diverse native plants and animals and opportunities for solitude and quiet reflection are landscape attributes that promote inspiration, serenity and rejuvenation of the human mind and spirit. The Gondwana Rainforests have inspired contributions in the fields of philosophy, painting, literature, music and photography.
Most of the reserves in the Gondwana Rainforests are located along the Great Eastern Escarpment behind the coastal plains, forming the mountain backdrop to a rapidly growing residential and tourist population. Those parts of the reserves that are easily accessible from the major population centres have high visitor values and provide outstanding settings for recreation and tourism.
The dramatic landscapes, waterfalls and lush forests of the Gondwana Rainforests attract a wide range of visitors seeking unique nature-based experiences. A diversity of activities are undertaken by visitors depending on the features and facilities within each reserve, including short walks, picnics, scenic drives, long-distance walks, mountain-bike riding and camping. Nature observation, bird watching and photography are popular activities across the diverse collection of reserves.
Park visitor centres have been established within and outside the Gondwana Rainforests in Dorrigo (NSW), Lamington (Qld) and Sea Acres (NSW) national parks. High-quality interpretive displays featuring the World Heritage site have also been installed in other reserves and nearby towns (Extracts from the updated Gondwana Rainforests Strategic Plan (in prep.).
The NSW Government is enhancing opportunities to access the property and enhance visitor experience through a range of infrastructure projects including improvements to walking tracks, lookouts and interpretation. The Australian Government provided funding through covid-stimulus grants to upgrade interpretation across the reserves in NSW, as well and funds to upgrade waking tracks and visitor accommodation in New England National Park. NSW Government plans to further showcase the World Heritage values of the property through the development of a multi-day walking track and upgrading the Dorrigo Rainforest Centre. More details here: Dorrigo Escarpment Great Walk | NSW Environment and Heritage
Most of the reserves in the Gondwana Rainforests are located along the Great Eastern Escarpment behind the coastal plains, forming the mountain backdrop to a rapidly growing residential and tourist population. Those parts of the reserves that are easily accessible from the major population centres have high visitor values and provide outstanding settings for recreation and tourism.
The dramatic landscapes, waterfalls and lush forests of the Gondwana Rainforests attract a wide range of visitors seeking unique nature-based experiences. A diversity of activities are undertaken by visitors depending on the features and facilities within each reserve, including short walks, picnics, scenic drives, long-distance walks, mountain-bike riding and camping. Nature observation, bird watching and photography are popular activities across the diverse collection of reserves.
Park visitor centres have been established within and outside the Gondwana Rainforests in Dorrigo (NSW), Lamington (Qld) and Sea Acres (NSW) national parks. High-quality interpretive displays featuring the World Heritage site have also been installed in other reserves and nearby towns (Extracts from the updated Gondwana Rainforests Strategic Plan (in prep.).
The NSW Government is enhancing opportunities to access the property and enhance visitor experience through a range of infrastructure projects including improvements to walking tracks, lookouts and interpretation. The Australian Government provided funding through covid-stimulus grants to upgrade interpretation across the reserves in NSW, as well and funds to upgrade waking tracks and visitor accommodation in New England National Park. NSW Government plans to further showcase the World Heritage values of the property through the development of a multi-day walking track and upgrading the Dorrigo Rainforest Centre. More details here: Dorrigo Escarpment Great Walk | NSW Environment and Heritage
Sacred natural sites or landscapes
There are several important known archaeological sites and a large number of sites of significance across the World Heritage site, many of which are associated with or include natural features in the landscape. Some of these have been declared as Aboriginal Places under the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974) including Wollumbin (Mount Warning) was declared in 2015. A list of some other places of Aboriginal significance can be found at https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/questions/find-aboriginal-places-of-significance-nsw.
The continuity of knowledge and use of these sites by First Nations people form the basis for native title claims under the provisions of the Native Title Act 1993.
In 2024 NPWS was awarded an Australian Government Heritage Grant to support work with Aboriginal communities and knowledge holders in the Hastings Macleay group of reserves of the Gondwana Rainforests. This project will gather information on First Nations cultural values and generate strategic directions for engagement with First Nations peoples in this area. The project aims to deliver increased opportunities for First Nations people to engage with 'Country', develop skills, establish a consultative network, and deliver a report outlining the First Nations heritage values of the area in the context of the World Heritage property.
In spring 2023, a First Nations led project saw the gathering of community for what is believed to be the first cultural burn undertaken on Barrington Tops National Park since colonisation. The project also aims to improve the protection and conservation of a vulnerable orchid (Diuris venosa) including in the World Heritage area. More details: "Grow, Harvest, Heal" (DCCEEW AdaptNSW, 2023)
The continuity of knowledge and use of these sites by First Nations people form the basis for native title claims under the provisions of the Native Title Act 1993.
In 2024 NPWS was awarded an Australian Government Heritage Grant to support work with Aboriginal communities and knowledge holders in the Hastings Macleay group of reserves of the Gondwana Rainforests. This project will gather information on First Nations cultural values and generate strategic directions for engagement with First Nations peoples in this area. The project aims to deliver increased opportunities for First Nations people to engage with 'Country', develop skills, establish a consultative network, and deliver a report outlining the First Nations heritage values of the area in the context of the World Heritage property.
In spring 2023, a First Nations led project saw the gathering of community for what is believed to be the first cultural burn undertaken on Barrington Tops National Park since colonisation. The project also aims to improve the protection and conservation of a vulnerable orchid (Diuris venosa) including in the World Heritage area. More details: "Grow, Harvest, Heal" (DCCEEW AdaptNSW, 2023)
Wilderness and iconic features
The Gondwana Rainforests include a number of areas that are identified as wilderness in legislation or public perception. Wilderness areas represent the most intact and undisturbed expanses of natural landscape. Free from development and roads, they provide opportunities for solitude and self-reliant recreation. They are also important for biological conservation, being of a size to allow the continuation of natural ecological and evolutionary processes with minimal interference. This protects the existing biodiversity, including many of the attributes of the site's Outstanding Universal Value, in a functioning natural system.
Carbon sequestration,
Soil stabilisation,
Water provision (importance for water quantity and quality)
The large undisturbed areas of the Gondwana Rainforests protect the headwaters of several major catchments, contributing to protection of water quality and mediating flows. Many of the components provide major environmental services in carbon sequestration, controlling erosion and conserving and maintaining water quantity and quality (Queensland Government, 2017).
Importance for research,
Contribution to education
The variety of ecological communities, landscapes and cultural sites of the Gondwana Rainforests and its accessibility and proximity to several universities make it ideal for research and educational opportunities. As some communities and species are almost exclusively found in these reserves, there will be ongoing scientific interest in the Gondwana Rainforests.
Research is currently conducted across the Gondwana Rainforests by a variety of people and groups from diverse fields, including international researchers and local universities. Several of the reserves in the Gondwana Rainforests have an established history of providing field sites for students from tertiary, secondary and primary education institutions.
The high scientific value of the Gondwana Rainforests reflects what has been discovered and what remains to be discovered. New species are still being identified and the unique relationships of the biota over the aeons is still being discovered.
The site is a natural laboratory for a wide range of scientific questions generating new knowledge and for providing education to the public.
Research is currently conducted across the Gondwana Rainforests by a variety of people and groups from diverse fields, including international researchers and local universities. Several of the reserves in the Gondwana Rainforests have an established history of providing field sites for students from tertiary, secondary and primary education institutions.
The high scientific value of the Gondwana Rainforests reflects what has been discovered and what remains to be discovered. New species are still being identified and the unique relationships of the biota over the aeons is still being discovered.
The site is a natural laboratory for a wide range of scientific questions generating new knowledge and for providing education to the public.
The World Heritage site provides a wide array of benefits to the surrounding communities as well as nationally and internationally. This includes an essential role in nature conservation, tourism, generation knowledge, and provision of environmental services such as clean water supplies.
There are significant long term and on-going Aboriginal connections to 'Country' including their cultural practices, stories, deep knowledge and spiritual values associated with this site, but these were not part of the reasons for its inscription on the World Heritage List. The local, national and international community benefits from their active engagement and conservation of this site.
There are significant long term and on-going Aboriginal connections to 'Country' including their cultural practices, stories, deep knowledge and spiritual values associated with this site, but these were not part of the reasons for its inscription on the World Heritage List. The local, national and international community benefits from their active engagement and conservation of this site.
| № | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney | The Rainforest Seed Conservation Project aims to increase the global capacity to conserve rainforest plants by investigating the storability of seeds of Australian species and developing methods for preserving those not suitable for seedbanking. |
https://www.botanicgardens.org.au/our-science/what-we-do/conservation-and-horticulture-australian-plantbank/key-projects-australian-1
|
| 2 | Springbrook Rescue | Springbrook Rescue is a 10- to 20-year project with overall aim of restoring rainforest on cleared areas and re-creating links between sections of the Springbrook National Park, thus creating a more viable World Heritage Area and one which provides a greater potential for its flora, fauna, fungi and other organisms, especially ancient lineages underlying criteria for listing, to survive the impacts of human-caused climate change. The Australian Rainforest Conservation Society accepted responsibility for managing, pro bono, the restoration program for properties purchased by the Queensland Government. The over-riding context is one of restoring World Heritage values and integrity with a focus on a whole-of-catchment approach where possible. Springbrook acts as a critical refugium especially for ancient lineages of plants and animals that would not otherwise survive modern day conditions. It is fundamentally important to expand the area of rainforest with its closed canopy and to repair canopy gaps created by unnecessarily wide roads, thus sealing in moister and cooler microclimates more akin to ancient palaeoclimates under which ancient lineages evolved. To be successful, a specific Program Logic was developed with clear long-term aspirational goals and explicit short-, intermediate- and longer-term objectives indicating the practical pathway by which those goals could be achieved. The objectives allow specific, measurable, achievable and realistic time-bound milestones or outcomes allowing transparent monitoring and review of progress with the possibility of improvements where results indicate the need. The Program Logic is described in more detail in the foundation Restoration Report (p. 27). |
https://springbrookrescue.org.au/
|
| 3 | Christmas Creek Landcare creek restoration | This project aims to rehabilitate Christmas Creek, Lamington by removing invasive weeds, removing litter and planting over 2,000 plants. | |
| 4 | NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service | Conservation programmes and projects are carried out within each component reserve of the World Heritage site consistent with reserve management plans, fire management plans, and regional pest management strategies. These projects include weed control, erosion control, bush regeneration projects, fire management including protection of fire-sensitive vegetation and refugia, feral animal control programs, research and monitoring. These programmes and projects are developed and implemented in partnership with community groups, Aboriginal partners, academic institutions, contractors and citizen science groups. Post fire assessment of the impacts of the 2019-20 wildfires on the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, including ground-truthing of satellite mapping and modelling is continuing. Funding has been provided for Bushfire Recovery program for threatened species to control impact of pest and weed species and support fire management projects. |
https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/conservation-and-heritage/gondwana-rainforests-of-australia
|
| 5 | Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and Partnerships | Conservation programmes and projects are carried out within each component reserve of the World Heritage site consistent with reserve management plans, fire management plans, and pest management strategies. These programs and projects are developed and implemented in partnership with community groups, Aboriginal partners, academic institutions and contractors and citizen science groups. Post fire assessment of the impacts of the 2019-20 wildfires on the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, including ground-truthing of satellite mapping and modelling is continuing. Funding has been provided for Bushfire Recovery program for threatened species to control impact of pest and weed species and support fire management projects. |
https://parks.des.qld.gov.au/management/managed-areas/world-heritage-areas/gondwana-rainforests
|
| 6 | NSW Saving Our Species program and NPWS partnership delivery including community technical and scientific expertise | Specific recovery actions are being undertaken at sites within the Gondwana Rainforests reserves for several threatened species. An example of a targeted program is the recovery of the Broad-toothed Rat (Mastacomys fuscus) at Barrington Tops, Gloucester Tops and further afield in the alpine area of Kosciuszko involving a number of collaborating bodies and funded by the NSW Government. |
https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/threatened-species/saving-our-species-program
|
| 7 | NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and Environment Energy and Science | Mapping and modelling of the extent and severity of the 2019-20 fires and undertaking recovery actions in partnership with reserve managers and natural resource management partners. Risk assessment of the impacts of the 2019-20 fires on the World Heritage values of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia Climate change adaptation plan for the World Heritage listed National Parks within the Tweed-Caldera Group of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia. | |
| 8 | Queensland Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation | Assessment of the impacts of the recent 2019-20 fires on the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, including mapping and modelling and ground truthing of the extent and severity of the 2019-20 fires in the Queensland section of the Gondwana Rainforests. Specific recovery actions are being undertaken at sites within the Queensland Gondwana Rainforests reserves for several threatened species impacted by 2019-2020 bushfires. These projects include weed control, erosion control, bush regeneration projects, fire management including protection of fire-sensitive vegetation and refugia, feral animal control programs, research and monitoring. Some of these programs and projects are developed and implemented with partnerships. Threatened species post-fire recovery projects for priority species including Eastern bristlebird, rufous scrub-bird, Coxen's fig-parrot, Albert's lyrebird, glossy black cockatoo, brush-tailed rock-wallaby, New Holland mouse, Hastings River mouse, cascade treefrog, Fleay's barred frog, red-and-yellow mountain frog, spotted-tailed quoll and long-nosed potoroo, key at-risk invertebrates, Zieria montana, Bertya ernestiana, Tetramolopium vagans, Agiortia cicatricata, Euphrasia bella, Pimelea umbratica, Dendrobium schneiderae var. schneiderae, Leionema elatius subsp. beckleri, Pultenaea whiteana, Pseudanthus pauciflorus subsp. pauciflorus, Bulbophyllum weinthalii subsp. weinthalii, Leptospermum barneyense, Sarcochilus hartmannii, Hibbertia monticola, Brachyscome ascendens, Coopernookia scabridiuscula, Comesperma breviflorum, Muellerina myrtifolia, Sarcochilus weinthalii, Phlegmariurus varius, Gonocarpus hirtus and Clematis fawcettii (Hines et.al. 2020, 2021 ,2022). | |
| 9 | Northern Tablelands Local Land Services in partnership with the NSW Environment and Energy and the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service | Conservation projects in partnership with the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and private landholders including assessment of the impacts of fires and the conservation status of species of significance for the Gondwana Rainforests including the Hastings River mouse and the rufous scrub bird. |
https://www.lls.nsw.gov.au/regions/northern-tablelands
|
| 10 | North Coast Local Land Services in partnership with the NSW Environment and Energy and the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service | Conservation projects in partnership with the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and private landholders including assessment of the impacts of fires and the conservation status of species of significance for the Gondwana Rainforests including the Hastings River mouse, the rufous scrub bird and the eastern bristlebird. Control of lantana to support management of Bell Miner Associated Dieback. |
https://www.lls.nsw.gov.au/our-regions/north-coast
|
| 11 | Hunter Local Land Services in partnership with the NSW Environment and Energy and the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service | Wild dog travel pathways and genetics, within Barrington Tops NP and surrounds - Applied research management project to be undertaken in partnership with the NSW Vertebrate Research Unit, Department of Primary Industry. |
https://www.lls.nsw.gov.au/regions/hunter
|
| 12 | Queensland Health Land and Water in partnership with the Qld Department of Environment and Science and the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service | Partnership projects with Traditional Owners, government, including the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, private industry, utilities and the community to support improve and protect South East Queensland’s environment including supporting post-fire recovery of reserves within the Queensland section of the Gondwana Rainforests. |
https://hlw.org.au/
|
| 13 | NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Northern Rivers Fire and Biodiversity Consortium, Southern Cross University, University of NSW, Forestry Corporation and the Border Ranges Alliance. | The Burning Hotspots – Gondwana Threatened Species and Fire project in the Northern Rivers region of NSW aims to secure threatened populations of 8 species. This collaborative project will run for 10 years, working across land tenures including national parks, state forests and neighbouring private lands on the Richmond / Koreelah Ranges, in and around World Heritage listed Gondwana Rainforests of northern NSW. The work builds on hazard reduction burns and lantana removal conducted in 2016 to help protect Eastern Bristlebird habitat and a related captive breeding program underway at Currumbin Wildlife Sanctuary. |
https://fireandrestoration.org.au/threatened-species-northern-rivers/
|
| 14 | Foundation for National Parks & Wildlife (FNPW) with Northern Rivers Fire & Biodiversity Consortium Inc and Border Ranges Alliance (BRA) | Post-fire 2019 project – likely to have been completed. The Marbled Frogmouth (Podargus ocellatus) inhabits similar wet forest types as Albert’s Lyrebird. It has very low reproduction rates, and experiences the same threats to the ongoing survival of the species – land clearing, inappropriate fire regimes and timber harvesting, with future impacts of climate change posing additional risks. With the majority of Albert’s Lyrebird and Marbled Frogmouth distribution outside of protected National Parks, private lands containing good areas of connecting habitat are likely to be important to the survival of these species and maintenance of their geographical range. This Threatened Species project, co-funded by FNPW and the NSW Government, involved: Holding workshops and on-site mentoring that focused on improving skills in invasive weed identification and control, native plant ID, plant propagation and bush regeneration techniques. Wildlife camera monitoring and data recording, fire awareness, wildlife friendly fencing, and feral animal monitoring and control. Undertaking baseline surveys on selected properties and establishing an ongoing monitoring program that landholders can participate in. Collating data and reporting overall results from the project, focussing on new records, threat assessments, improved knowledge around patterns of movement and population health. Encouraging site-based management to mitigate threats and restore habitat will assist in maintaining rainforest Threatened Ecological Communities in these areas and also benefit a range of other fauna species. |
https://www.fnpw.org.au/latest-updates/trails-for-tails
|
| 15 | University of Newcastle with the NSW Saving our species program and the NSW Environmental Trust | Many ecosystems across New South Wales are showing signs of collapse, and our native species are threatened with extinction. Saving our Species is working today so we can secure our native plants, animals and ecosystems for generations to come. | |
| 16 | University of Newcastle with the NSW Saving our species program | Adaptive capacity in mountain-top frogs | |
| 17 | University of New England with the NSW Saving our species program | Pollination systems as indicators of fire regime impacts – a study of thresholds | |
| 18 | University if New South Wales through the Commonwealth Bushfire Recovery program | Building capacity for resilience and recovery of threatened ecological communities |
https://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/bushfire-recovery/open-grant-program
|
| 19 | NSW NPWS and University of Newcastle | Assessment of the impact of large vertebrate pests on the Montane Swamps, broad-toothed rat and Amphibians in Barrington Tops NP | |
| 20 | University of Newcastle | Long-term monitoring of threatened stream frog communities, including assessment of the impact of the amphibian disease chytridiomycosis | |
| 21 | University of Western Sydney in partnership with the NSW Environment and Energy and the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service | Post-fire response of golden-tipped bat Phoniscus papuensis | |
| 22 | Southern Cross University | Studies of the habitat features and the impact of climate warming on the mountain frog (Philoria kundagungan) | |
| 23 | Jaliigirr Biodiversity Alliance Inc. | The Alliance has been established to support the voluntary contributions of organisations, landholders and community and Aboriginal community, to improve and protect the biodiversity of the diverse landscapes between the Dorrigo Plateau, the hinterland and the coastal plains of the mid north coast of New South Wales. The Alliance predominately exercises its functions within the Gumbaynggirr Aboriginal Nation, and the Alliance recognises and appreciates the involvement of Aboriginal communities in the Gumbaynggirr Nation, as the Aboriginal People continue practices in Natural Resource Management consistent with their Cultural beliefs. This Alliance encompasses the geographic area of Coffs Harbour, Bellingen, Upper Nymboida -Dorrigo Plateau, covering a catchment area of 337,000 hectares, stretching from the plateau to the coast and including an altitudinal range of 1564 metres. Alliance partners understand and value the vital contributions that Aboriginal communities can make to ensure resilient landscapes are realised, considering the Cultural attachments to those landscapes. Additionally the Alliance recognises that Aboriginal communities have continued attachments to the landscapes and encourages Aboriginal businesses in the Natural Resource Management regime. Partners of the Alliance include many local community and Aboriginal groups, individuals, government and non – government agencies, public authority, business and education institutions who have an active interest in the health of the environment. The values of the region covered by the Jaliigirr Biodiversity Alliance have been recognised in a number of local and regional plans and strategies. These include the Northern Rivers Regional Biodiversity Management Plan, Northern Rivers Catchment Action Plan, Reserve Plans of Management, values of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, Threatened Flora and Fauna Plans of Management, and Coffs Harbour Biodiversity Action Strategy. |
https://www.jaliigirr.com.au/
|
| 24 | Private land conservation | Multiple projects supported by local and state governments, non-government organisations and local landholders, e.g., Bulimbah Nature Refuge (Bulimba Creek Catchment Coordinating Association), Bartopia Nature Refuge, Land for Wildlife properties. | |
| 25 | Border Ranges Biodiversity Alliance | Established around 2011, the Border Ranges Alliance was formed from a core group involved in the development of the Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan, a federally funded multi-species recovery plan focussing on the rainforest and associated vegetation types of the Border Ranges Global Biodiversity Hotspot in northern NSW and South East Queensland. |
https://ger.org.au/partners/border-ranges-alliance/
|
| 26 | Australian Rainforest Conservation Society | Commencing in 2005, this 20-year program is protecting, enhancing and expanding the World Heritage rainforests of Springbrook through the purchase of properties that contribute to habitat values and connectivity, and the restoration of rainforest and other habitats on any cleared or degraded areas on these properties. |
https://springbrookrescue.org.au/
|
| 27 | Big Scrub Rainforest Conservancy | Conserving endangered lowland rainforest and its many threatened species in the Big Scrub Region of the NSW North Coast Our mission is to help save from extinction Australia’s critically endangered lowland subtropical rainforest and its many threatened species. We talk to and work with governments, philanthropists, business, private landholders, community organisations and the general community on our unique lowland subtropical rainforest, its magnificent biodiversity, its restoration and ongoing care. |
https://www.bigscrubrainforest.org/
|
| 28 | Smart Green Cities Research Centre at Macquarie University with AdaptNSW, DCCEEW (NSW) | The first Community-led cultural burn in Barrington Tops since colonisation involved 60 Worimi people, led by Aunty Michelle Perry with a focus on protection and sustainable harvesting of a vulnerable orchid It is a purple-veined heart orchid with ivory petals, recently renamed Bulgarr-Gulga Watuun in the local Gathang language to reflect its history. this is the first of the cultural burns that may used to help heal country. |
https://www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.au/news-and-events/adaptnsw-2023-forum/grow-harvest-heal-how-new-conservation-programs-harness-ancient
|
| 29 | The Great Eastern Ranges (GER) initiative & Partners | Since 2007, the Great Eastern Ranges (GER) initiative has been bringing people together to connect, protect and regenerate nature, providing solutions at the scale needed to meet our climate, biodiversity and wellbeing challenges. GER serves as a backbone organisation for connectivity conservation providing the big-picture vision and catalysing collective action to achieve shared conservation and restoration goals across public and private land. We take a collaborative approach, partnering with over 250 environmental non-profits, Landcare and community groups, government agencies, First Nations organisations and research partners. Through our partnerships, we support community-led projects that meet local needs and build capacity, while filling the gaps in science, knowledge, resources and collaboration needed to link these efforts across multiple landscapes to create positive impacts at the regional and continental scale. |
https://ger.org.au/about/our-purpose-and-approach/
|
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
ANU. (2009). Implications of climate change for Australia’s World Heritage properties: A preliminary assessment. A report to the Department of Climate Change and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts by the Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University.
|
| 2 |
Baker, A.M., Mutton, T.Y., Hines, H.B.. & Van Dyck, S. (2014). The Black-tailed Antechinus, Antechinus arktos sp. nov.: a new species of carnivorous marsupial from montane regions of the Tweed Volcano caldera, eastern Australia. Zootaxa 3765(2): 101-133
|
| 3 |
Berger, L., Speare, R., Daszak, P., Green, D.E., Cunningham, A.A., Goggin, C.L., Slocombe, R., Ragan, M.A., Hyatt, A.D., McDonald, K.R., Hines, H.B., Lips, K.R., Marantelli, G. & Parkes, H. (1998). Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rainforests of Australia and Central America, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95: 9031–9036.
|
| 4 |
BirdLife International (2022). Species factsheet: Rufous Scrub-bird Atrichornis rufescens. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/rufous-scru… (Accessed on 09/09/2025).
|
| 5 |
BirdLife International (2022b). Species factsheet: Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/eastern-bri… (Accessed on 09/09/2025).
|
| 6 |
Bishop, T. F. A., R. Daniel, D. I. Guest, M. A. Nelson, and C. Chang. (2012). A digital soil map of Phytophthora cinnamomi in the Gondwana Rainforests of eastern Australia.
|
| 7 |
Bowdler, S. (2000). The management of Indigenous ceremonial ("bora") sites as components of cultural landscapes. In M. M. Cotter, W. E. Boyd, & J. E. Gardiner (Eds.), Heritage Landscapes: Understanding Place and Communities (pp. 237-254). Southern Cross University Press.
|
| 8 |
Bryant, L. M., & Krosch, M. N. (2016). Lines in the land: a review of evidence for eastern Australia's major biogeographical barriers to closed forest taxa. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119(2), 238-264.
|
| 9 |
CSIRO (2019). Climate change impacts on the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, Earth systems and Climate change Hub Report No. 8. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
|
| 10 |
Cairns Kylie M., Crowther Mathew S., Nesbitt Bradley, Letnic Mike (2022) The myth of wild dogs in Australia: are there any out there?. Australian Mammalogy 44, 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM20055
|
| 11 |
Chester, G. & Bushnell, S. (2005) Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves of Australia: A monitoring strategy. Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Cairns. 156 pp.
|
| 12 |
Cohen, B. E. (2012). The scenic rim of southeastern Queensland, Australia: A history of mid Cenozoic intraplate volcanism. Episodes 35:103-109.
|
| 13 |
Commonwealth of Australia (2000). Strategic overview for management of the World Heritage Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves of Australia / CERRA. Canberra : Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2000.
|
| 14 |
Crisp, M. D., S. Laffan, H. P. Linder, and A. Monro. (2001). Endemism in the Australian flora. Journal of Biogeography 28, pp 183-198.
|
| 15 |
Crisp, M. D., and L. G. Cook. (2013). How Was the Australian Flora Assembled Over the Last 65 Million Years? A Molecular Phylogenetic Perspective in D. J. Futuyma, editor. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Vol 44, pp 303.
|
| 16 |
DAWE (DAFF) (2021). Annual Report 2020 - 2021. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra. CC BY 4.0.Available at: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/document…
|
| 17 |
DCCEEW (2016). Threat abatement plan for infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting in chytridiomycosis. Department of Environment and Energy, Commonwealth of Australia 2016. Available at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/tap…
|
| 18 |
DCCEEW (2022). Threatened Species Strategy Action Plan 2022–2032, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Canberra, September. CC BY 4.0. Available at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/thr…
|
| 19 |
DECCW (Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW) (2010) Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan - NSW & Queensland, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, Sydney.
|
| 20 |
DERC (2011). Lamington National Park Management Plan 2011. Planning Services Unit, Department of Environment and Resource Management, Queensland.
|
| 21 |
DES (2017). Queensland State of the Environment Report (SoE), 2017. Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government. Available at: https://www.stateoftheenvironment.des.qld.gov.au/_media/doc…
|
| 22 |
DES (2020). The Gurra Gurra FRAMEWORK 2020–2026. Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, Australia. Available at: https://www.des.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/2020…
|
| 23 |
DPC (2020). Final Report of the NSW Bushfire Inquiry. Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Sydney. Available at: https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/noindex/2023-06/…
|
| 24 |
DPC (2024). 1,000 new jobs for expanded Indigenous Rangers program. Prime Ministers and Cabinet Portfolio, Australian Government. Published online 31 October 2024. Available at: https://ministers.pmc.gov.au/mccarthy/2024/1000-new-jobs-ex…
|
| 25 |
DPIE (2020). Wildlife and Conservation Bushfire Recovery: Immediate Response January 2020. Department of Planning, Industry and the Environment, NSW Government. Available at: https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Si…
|
| 26 |
Dickman, C. R., Newsome, T. M., & van Eeden, L. M. (2019). The dingo dilemma: a brief history of debate. Australian zoologist, 41(3), 298-321. In ‘The dingo dilemma: cull, contain or conserve’, 2019, Sydney, NSW. (Eds C. R. Dickman, D. Lunney, T. M. Newsome).
|
| 27 |
Dickman, C., Driscoll, D., Garnett, S., Keith, D., Legge, S., Lindenmayer, D., Maron, M., Reside, A., Ritchie, E., Watson, J., Wintle, B., Woinarski, J. (2020). After the catastrophe: a blueprint for a conservation response to large-scale ecological disaster. Threatened Species Recovery Hub. National Environmental Science Program.
|
| 28 |
Doherty, T. S., Watchorn, D. J., Miritis, V., Pestell, A. J., & Geary, W. L. (2023). Cats, foxes and fire: quantitative review reveals that invasive predator activity is most likely to increase shortly after fire. Fire Ecology, 19(1), 22.
|
| 29 |
Downing, A., R. Peacock, and H. Ramsay. (2014). Some new and noteworthy bryophytes from Antarctic Beech (Nothofagus moorei) forests of north-eastern New South Wales. Telopea 17, pp 239-250.
|
| 30 |
Ehmann, H. (1997) Threatened frogs of New South Wales: Habitats, status and conservation. Frog and Tadpole Study Group of NSW, Sydney.
|
| 31 |
Fensham, R. J., & Radford-Smith, J. (2021). Unprecedented extinction of tree species by fungal disease. Biological Conservation, 261, 109276.
|
| 32 |
Feros, K. (2009). Case Study 1: Gondwana Rainforests of Australia. In: Engels, B. (ed.) Serial Natural World Heritage Properties – Challenges for Nomination and Management. Proceedings of a workshop. BfN, Germany.
|
| 33 |
Floyd AG (1990). Australian Rainforests in New South Wales. Surrey Beatty and Sons Pty Limited, Chipping Norton, NSW.
|
| 34 |
Fox, I. (2003). An Aboriginal Heritage Study of a Traditional Pathway: Linking Coastal and Upland Resources, Northern New South Wales (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Cross University).
|
| 35 |
Hagger, V., Fisher, D., Schmidt, S. and Blomberg, S., (2013). Assessing the vulnerability of an assemblage of subtropical rainforest vertebrate species to climate change in south‐east Queensland. Austral Ecology, 38(4), pp.465-475.
|
| 36 |
Hero, J.-M., Gillespie, G., Lemckert, F., Robertson, P. & Littlejohn, M. (2004). Litoria booroolongensis. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1. . Downloaded on 07 October 2012.
|
| 37 |
Hines, H.B. & McDonald, K. (2000). Declining frogs of subtropical Australia’s rainforests, declining frogs of Australia’s rainforests. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service.
|
| 38 |
Hines, H.B. and the South-east Queensland Threatened Frogs Recovery Team (2002). Recovery plan for stream frogs of south-east Queensland 2001–2005. Report to Environment Australia, Canberra, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Brisbane.
|
| 39 |
Hines, H.B. et al. (2020) Post-fire Assessment Report— Natural Values: 2019 bushfire, Lamington National Park, South East Queensland Region. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and Partnerships, Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science
|
| 40 |
Hines, H.B. et al. (2021) Post-fire Assessment Report— Natural Values: 2019 bushfire complex, Main Range National Park and adjacent QPWS estate, South West Queensland Region. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and Partnerships, Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science
|
| 41 |
Hines, H.B. et al. (2022) Post-fire Assessment Report— Natural Values: 2019 bushfire, Mt BarneyNational Park, South East Queensland Region. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and Partnerships, Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science
|
| 42 |
Hines, H.B., Mahony, M. & McDonald, K. (1999). An assessment of frog declines in wet subtropical Australia, in A. Campbell (ed.). Declines and disappearances of Australian frogs. Environment Australia, Canberra: 44–63.
|
| 43 |
Hines, H.B., Meyer, E., Newell, D., Clarke, J., & Hero, J.-M. (2004). Mixophyes fleayi. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1. Downloaded on 07 October 2012.
|
| 44 |
Hockings, M. et al. (2019) ‘The IUCN green list of protected and conserved areas: Setting the standard for effective area‐based conservation’, Parks, 25(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKAS-25-2MH.en.
|
| 45 |
Hunter, D. & Gillespie, G.R. (2011). National Recovery Plan for the Stuttering Frog Mixophyes balbus. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
|
| 46 |
Hunter, R.J. (2004). World Heritage and associative natural values of the Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves of Australia. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service.
|
| 47 |
IUCN Consultation (2017). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation: Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, Australia.
|
| 48 |
IUCN Consultation (2020a). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation: Respondent 1. Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, Australia.
|
| 49 |
IUCN Consultation (2020b). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation: Respondent 2. Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, Australia.
|
| 50 |
IUCN Consultation (2020c). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation: Respondent 3. Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, Australia.
|
| 51 |
IUCN Consultation (2024). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation: Gondwana Rainforests of Australia, Australia.
|
| 52 |
Keith DA (2004). Ocean shores to desert dunes: the native vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, Sydney
|
| 53 |
Keith, D.A., Mahony, M., Hines, H., Elith, J., Regan, T.J., Baumgartner, J.B., Hunter, D., Heard, G.W., Mitchell, N.J., Parris, K.M. and Penman, T., (2014). Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria. Conservation Biology, 28(3), pp.810-819.
|
| 54 |
Kitching RL, Putland D, Ashton LA, Laidlaw MJ, Boulter SL, Christensen H and Lambkin CL. (2011). Detecting biodiversity changes along climatic gradients: The IBISCA Queensland Project, Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 55(2), 235–250.
|
| 55 |
Kooyman, R. M., J. Watson, and P. Wilf. (2020). Protect Australia's Gondwana Rainforests. Science 367, pp 1083-1083.
|
| 56 |
Kooyman, R. M., Wilf, P., Barreda, V. D., Carpenter, R. J., Jordan, G. J., Sniderman, J. K., ... & Weston, P. H. (2014). Paleo‐Antarctic rainforest into the modern Old World tropics: The rich past and threatened future of the “southern wet forest survivors”. American Journal of Botany, 101(12), 2121-2135.
|
| 57 |
Laidlaw MJ, McDonald WJF, Hunter RJ, Putland DA and Kitching RL. (2011). The potential impacts of climate change on Australian subtropical rainforest, Australian Journal of Ecology, 59, pp 444–449.
|
| 58 |
Laidlaw MJ, Richardson KS, Yeates A, McDonald WJF and Hunter RJ. (2016). Modelling the spatial distribution of beta diversity in Australian subtropical rainforest, Austral Ecology, pp 189– 196.
|
| 59 |
Laidlaw, M.J., Hines, H.B., Melzer, R.I. and Churchill, T.B., (2022). Beyond bushfire severity: Mapping the ecological impact of bushfires on the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage Area. Australian Zoologist, 42(2), pp.502-513.
|
| 60 |
Legge, S., Woinarski, J. C. Z., Scheele, B. C., Garnett, S. T., Lintermans, M., Nimmo, D. G., Whiterod, N. S., Southwell, D. M., Ehmke, G., Buchan, A., Gray, J., Metcalfe, D. J., Page, M., Rumpff, L., van Leeuwen, S., Williams, D., Ahyong, S. T., Chapple, D. G., Cowan, M., … Tingley, R. (2022). Rapid assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the 2019–2020 Australian megafires to guide urgent management intervention and recovery and lessons for other regions. Diversity and Distributions, 28, 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13428
|
| 61 |
Lentz, C. F. O. (Carl F. O. (1961). C.F.O. Lentz “Memoirs and Some History” Unpublished Typescript 1961.
|
| 62 |
Loyd, A.M., Pennay, M. (2021). "Phoniscus papuensis". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021. Available at: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/10982/22021190
|
| 63 |
Lunney, D. & McKenzie, N. (2008). Macropus parma. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1. Downloaded on 3 October 2012.
|
| 64 |
Mahony MJ, Hines HB, Mahony SV, Moses B, Catalano SR, Myers S, Donnellan SC (2021) A new Hip-Pocket frog from mid-eastern Australia (Anura: Myobatrachidae: Assa). Zootaxa 5057(4): 451–486.
|
| 65 |
Maxwell, S., Burbidge, A.A. and Morris, K. (1996). Action Plan for Australian Marsupials and Monotremes. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publi… (Accessed on 7 October, 2012).
|
| 66 |
McBryde, I. (1974). Aboriginal prehistory in New England : an archaeological survey of northeastern New South Wales / Isabel McBryde. Sydney University Press.
|
| 67 |
McIntyre-Tamwoy, Susan, Best, Ysola, and Fahey, Barbara (2010) The Aboriginal values of rainforest. In: Kitching, Roger, Braithwaite, Richard, and Cavanagh, Janet, (eds.) Remnants of Gondwana: a natural and social history of the Gondwana rainforests of Australia. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Baulkham Hills, Australia, pp. 235-246.
|
| 68 |
Melzer, R., Ezzy, L. and Hines, H., B. (2019) ‘Health checks: A simple tool for assessing the condition of values and effectiveness of reserve management’, Parks, 25(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKS-25-2RM.en.
|
| 69 |
NPWS (2005). Gibraltar Range Group of Parks (Incorporating Barool, Capoompeta, Gibraltar Range, Nymboida and Washpool National Parks and Nymboida and Washpool State Conservation Areas) Plan of Management. National Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Environment and Conservation, New South Wales. Available at: http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/parks/PoMGibral…
|
| 70 |
NSW (2022). NSW Wild Dog Management Strategy 2022-2027. NSW Government. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/4452…
|
| 71 |
NSW BCT (2024). Aboriginal Empowerment Strategy 2024-27. NSW Biodiversity Conservation Trust. Available at: https://www.bct.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-07/abor…
|
| 72 |
NSW DPIE. (2020). Wildlife and Conservation. Bushfire Recovery. Immediate Response January 2020. New South Wales Department of Planning, Industry and Environment. Available at: environment.nsw.gov.au
|
| 73 |
Narsey S, Laidlaw M, Colman R, Pearce K, Hopkins M and Dowdy A. (2020). Understanding the impact of climate change on cloud forests in the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage Area, Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub Report No. 20, NESP Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub, Australia.
|
| 74 |
Newell, D.A., Goldingay, R.L. and Brooks, L.O., (2013). Population recovery following decline in an endangered stream-breeding frog (Mixophyes fleayi) from subtropical Australia. PLoS One, 8(3), p.e58559.
|
| 75 |
OEH (2012). National Recovery Plan for Booroolong Frog (Litoria booroolongensis). Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), Hurstville.
|
| 76 |
Pavlacky Jr, D. C., Possingham, H. P., & Goldizen, A. W. (2015). Integrating life history traits and forest structure to evaluate the vulnerability of rainforest birds along gradients of deforestation and fragmentation in eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 188, 89-99.
|
| 77 |
Queensland Government (2017). Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan 2017–2022. State of Queensland. Available at: https://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017…
|
| 78 |
Quick, G., Goldingay, R.L., Parkyn, J. and Newell, D.A., (2015). Population stability in the endangered Fleay’s barred frog (Mixophyes fleayi) and a program for long-term monitoring. Australian Journal of Zoology, 63(3), pp.214-219.
|
| 79 |
Riordan, C. E., Pearce, C., McDonald, B. J., Gynther, I., & Baker, A. M. (2020). Vegetation structure and ground cover attributes describe the occurrence of a newly discovered carnivorous marsupial on the Tweed Shield Volcano caldera, the endangered black‐tailed dusky antechinus (Antechinus arktos). Ecology and Evolution, 10(4), 2104-2121.
|
| 80 |
Scarlett, K., Daniel, R., Shuttleworth, L. A., Roy, B., Bishop, T. F., & Guest, D. I. (2015). Phytophthora in the Gondwana rainforests of Australia world heritage area. Australasian Plant Pathology, 44(3), 335-348.
|
| 81 |
Scheele, B.C., Pasmans, F., Skerratt, L.F., Berger, L., Martel, A.N., Beukema, W., Acevedo, A.A., Burrowes, P.A., Carvalho, T., Catenazzi, A. and De la Riva, I., (2019). Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science, 363(6434), pp.1459-1463.
|
| 82 |
Schulz, M (1999). "Roosts used by the golden-tipped bat Kerivoula papuensis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)". Journal of Zoology. 250 (4): 467–478. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00790.x.
|
| 83 |
Schulz, M., Campbell C.D., Schroder, M. (2024) Mainland broad-toothed rat (Mastacomys fuscus mordicus) recovery after wildfire. Australian Mammalogy 46, AM23030.
|
| 84 |
State Party of Australia (2003). Periodic Reporting Cycle 1, Section II: Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves of Australia. Australian National Periodic Report. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/368/documents/
|
| 85 |
State Party of Australia (2022). State of conservation of Gondwana Rainforests of Australia (Australia). [online]. Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/368/documents/
|
| 86 |
State Party of Australia (2023). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Gondwana Rainforests of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/368/documents/
|
| 87 |
State Party of Australia (2024). State of conservation of Gondwana Rainforests of Australia (Australia). [online]. Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/368/documents/
|
| 88 |
State of conservation of Gondwana Rainforests of Australia (Australia). [online]. Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/368/documents/> [Accessed 30 November 2020].
|
| 89 |
TSSC (2019) Threatened Species Scientific Committee- final determinations [online] https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plant…
|
| 90 |
Threatened Species Scientific Committee (2016). Conservation Advice Petauroides volans greater glider. Canberra: Department of the Environment. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/speci…. In effect under the EPBC Act from 25-May-2016.
|
| 91 |
Threatened Species Scientific Committee (2017). Conservation Advice. Antechinus arktos. Available at: <http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/speci…; [Accessed 14 October 2020].
|
| 92 |
Threatened Species Scientific Committee (2018). Conservation Advice Antechinus arktos black-tailed antechinus. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Energy. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/speci…. In effect under the EPBC Act from 11-May-2018.
|
| 93 |
Willacy RJ., Mahony M. and Newell DA. (2015). If a frog calls in the forest: Bioacoustic monitoring reveals the breeding phenology of the endangered Richmond Range mountain frog (Philoria richmondensis), Austral Ecology, vol.40, pp.625–633.
|
| 94 |
Willacy, R.J., Mahony, M. and Newell, D.A., (2015). If a frog calls in the forest: Bioacoustic monitoring reveals the breeding phenology of the endangered Richmond Range mountain frog (Philoria richmondensis). Austral Ecology, 40(6), pp.625-633.
|
| 95 |
Woodside, D. P., Schulz, M. and Law, B. S. (2023). Golden-tipped Bat, Kerivoula papuensis, pp. 618-619. In: Baker, Andrew M. and Gynther, Ian C. (eds.). Strahan’s Mammals of Australia (4th ed.). Wahroonga, NSW: Reed New Holland Publishers. 848 pp.
|
| 96 |
World Commission on Protected Areas (2025) IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas, IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas. Available at: https://iucngreenlist.org/ (Accessed: 11 April 2025)
|