Parc national de Göreme et sites rupestres de Cappadoce
Country
Turkey
Inscribed in
1985
Criteria
(i)
(iii)
(v)
(vii)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "significant concern" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
Dans un paysage saisissant modelé par l'érosion, la vallée de Göreme et ses environs abritent des sanctuaires rupestres, témoignages irremplaçables sur l'art byzantin de la période post-iconoclaste, ainsi que des habitations, des villages troglodytiques et des villes souterraines, vestiges d'un habitat humain traditionnel dont les débuts remontent au IVe siècle. © UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
11 oct 2025
Significant concern
Current state and trend of VALUES
High Concern
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
Superlative natural features and spectacular landscape
Criterion
(vii)
In a spectacular landscape dramatically demonstrating erosional forces, the Göreme Valley and its surroundings provide a globally renowned and accessible display of hoodoo landforms (also known as "fairy chimneys") and other erosional features, which are of great beauty, and which interact with the cultural elements of the landscape (World Heritage Committee, 2013). The valley of pinnacles at Göreme is carved from a broad 1,000m-high plateau of lava-covered tuff, a fine grained rock of consolidated volcanic ash, which has been deeply eroded into a surreal landscape of hundreds of cones and lava-capped pillars (UNEP-WCMC, 2011).
Important plant diversity
Göreme Hills has been designated as an “Important Plant Area (IPA)” by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF-Turkey). This area, where human settlements have been maintained since prehistoric times, has preserved important steppe plant communities that have survived to the present day, and the presence of approximately 650 taxon has been detected within the national park borders. Of these, 118 are endemic to Turkey. There are 23 rare plants nationwide in Goreme Hills IPA. In addition, this area is covered by the Iranian-Anatolian steppes among the “Endangered Habitats” under the Bern Convention (Ciftci et al., 2021). There are also plant species unique to the region that take their scientific names from the Cappadocia Region (e.g. Allium cappadocicum (Cappadocian onion), Allium nevsehirense (Nevşehir onion), Festuca cappadocica (Fairy ball), Eruca cappadocica (Izgın), Gundelia cappadocica (Cappadocia kengeri), Polygonum cappadocicum (Cappadocia mammoth), Hesperis cappadocica (Cappadocia evening star)) (NEVÜ, 2022).
Assessment information
In spite of the prohibition of construction activities in the area, construction of illegal buildings continues to damage the natural and historical texture of the site. There have been various court proceedings related to the construction of tourist and commercial infrastructure and in 2024, the Ankara Regional Administrative Court suspended large-scale development plans for Cappadocia, based on concerns that the proposed plans would cause irreparable damage to the area. The suspended plans included the 1/25,000-scale Upper Scale Area Plan for Cappadocia, which has been argued could expose Cappadocia to development risks rather than protecting its historical heritage. At the same time, in the area of visible terraces of Göreme Valley, development of tourist service areas has resulted in increased disturbed scenery. There are also other threats including increasing tourism pressure and associated ATV and road use, coupled with road construction. Heavy machinery caused historical and cultural damage in the area. Near the junction of the Ortahisar-Göreme road with the Göreme museum road, new cracks have appeared in the dining hall located within a monastery complex, highlighting the need to raise awareness of the fragility of the site's OUV and the potential damage from tourist, construction and other activities. Furthermore, there is natural deterioration at geological formations and archaeological values due to wind and water erosion and human disturbance. In recent years, due to construction of irrigation dams, humidity becomes another potential natural pressure on geological formations.
Recreational Activities
(Uncontrolled tourism)
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
The impacts of uncontrolled and potential mass tourism are of some concern. According to the RAPPAM assessment undertaken in 2009, tourism and daily recreation activities were considered as a threat with a low increase in trend (Stanciu et al., 2009). The estimated annual visitor numbers to the World Heritage site are between 2 and 4 million people (State Party of Turkey, 2024), however according to media reports, officials aim to increase numbers to 7 million, demonstrating the desire to increase capacity to meet international demand (Daily Sabah, 2020). This also increases pressure to develop accommodation capacity. There are also concerns about the number of caravans within and near the site not adhering to the caravan park localities designed for them (Saglamdin, 2022).
The places with the highest visitor and vehicle density are the Göreme Open Air Museum and the area of fairy chimneys called Three Beauties. The Göreme Open Air Museum and the tourism and industrial areas within the municipal boundaries of Ürgüp and Avanos place high ecological pressure on the World Heritage site (Ciftci et al., 2021). Studies have revealed that in Göreme open air museum, the recreational carrying capacity was exceeded in all months of the year except in the winter months. The results differ according to the summer and winter periods. However, it was determined that the number of monthly visitors that Göreme Open Air Museum should host should be 51,450 (Yildirim and Eren, 2024). A visitor management plan is urgently needed along with an increase in staff capacity and training to enforce regulations and limit tourist pressure in highly vulnerable areas (Yetiş et al., 2022).
According to Ceylan (2022), about 36 tourism agencies have organized ATV tours in the area. Each agency has an average of 20 ATV vehicles, and about 400 ATVs are used in the area daily. However, other estimates predict up to 1500 ATVs in the area, although not all are used in the same day for tours. ATV tours in certain valley in the area, damage the natural heritage site (in particular the natural texture), and create intense localised visitor pressure. Although the Cappadocia Area Presidency has determined the upper limit of 20 ATVs for each agency, the number of ATVs in the area continues to increase. It has been recommended that alternative modes of transport like cycling, horseback riding and walking on foot should be promoted to protect the site's natural features (Ceylan, 2022).
The places with the highest visitor and vehicle density are the Göreme Open Air Museum and the area of fairy chimneys called Three Beauties. The Göreme Open Air Museum and the tourism and industrial areas within the municipal boundaries of Ürgüp and Avanos place high ecological pressure on the World Heritage site (Ciftci et al., 2021). Studies have revealed that in Göreme open air museum, the recreational carrying capacity was exceeded in all months of the year except in the winter months. The results differ according to the summer and winter periods. However, it was determined that the number of monthly visitors that Göreme Open Air Museum should host should be 51,450 (Yildirim and Eren, 2024). A visitor management plan is urgently needed along with an increase in staff capacity and training to enforce regulations and limit tourist pressure in highly vulnerable areas (Yetiş et al., 2022).
According to Ceylan (2022), about 36 tourism agencies have organized ATV tours in the area. Each agency has an average of 20 ATV vehicles, and about 400 ATVs are used in the area daily. However, other estimates predict up to 1500 ATVs in the area, although not all are used in the same day for tours. ATV tours in certain valley in the area, damage the natural heritage site (in particular the natural texture), and create intense localised visitor pressure. Although the Cappadocia Area Presidency has determined the upper limit of 20 ATVs for each agency, the number of ATVs in the area continues to increase. It has been recommended that alternative modes of transport like cycling, horseback riding and walking on foot should be promoted to protect the site's natural features (Ceylan, 2022).
Residential Areas, Commercial & Industrial Areas, Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Construction of tourist, residential and commercial infrastructure (legal and illegal))
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Proliferation of infrastructure associated with the requirements of mass tourism, construction of tourist hotels in safeguarded areas and associated transportation (road network) was defined as a high threat in the RAPPAM 2009 assessment (Stanciu et al., 2009). There is illegal housing inside the National Park especially near residential areas. In recent years, the infrastructure problem persists (Yetiş et al., 2022) due to increasing unplanned construction by various tourism-related stakeholders, which requires active management by local authorities. Visual pollution and damage to the geological structure of the region have been noted as a result. The necessity of adapting the arrangements made to the texture of the region, the demolition of the distorted structures made in the past period, and the regular follow-up of the restoration works are critical management needs (Yetiş et al., 2022).
The Ankara Branch of the Chamber of Architects has called for the halt of a commercial building project in the Ürgüp district of the central Anatolian province of Nevşehir, which includes the historical region of Cappadocia. Along with the commercial building project, there are several ongoing projects near Cappadocia, including the construction of a hotel in Sarıhıdır Neighborhood and a residential project as part of the "Ürgüp Nation's Garden" project, said the chamber. With these projects, historical and natural sites are damaged. The Chamber of Architects Ankara Branch on filed a criminal complaint against the mayor of Ürgüp for "misconduct" because of the activities against the Law No. 2863 on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property. After the complaint, the construction activities were halted but later resumed. The architects say that the contract for the construction of the commercial building should be cancelled and the construction should be stopped immediately, with the already built parts removed in proper techniques to prevent new damage to the caves (Bianet, 2022).
Since 2019, Cappadocia Area President Birol Incecikoz has been combating unauthorized construction and other activities in the region, removing close to 800 illegal buildings from the area and increasing surveillance. Nevertheless, illegal activities persist. With nearly 1,000 cases still awaiting judgment, Cappadocia’s authorities remain committed to eradicating all illegal buildings (Hacialioglu, 2024).
In 2024, the Ankara Regional Administrative Court suspended large-scale development plans for Cappadocia, based on concerns that the proposed plans would cause irreparable damage to the area. The suspended plans included the 1/25,000-scale Upper Scale Area Plan for Cappadocia, which was approved in October 2023 following some modifications in response to objections. However, the Chamber of Architects and the Chamber of City Planners opposed the plan, arguing that it would expose Cappadocia to development risks rather than protecting its historical heritage. Therefore, the groups filed for the plan’s cancellation (Devami, 2024).
The Ankara Branch of the Chamber of Architects has called for the halt of a commercial building project in the Ürgüp district of the central Anatolian province of Nevşehir, which includes the historical region of Cappadocia. Along with the commercial building project, there are several ongoing projects near Cappadocia, including the construction of a hotel in Sarıhıdır Neighborhood and a residential project as part of the "Ürgüp Nation's Garden" project, said the chamber. With these projects, historical and natural sites are damaged. The Chamber of Architects Ankara Branch on filed a criminal complaint against the mayor of Ürgüp for "misconduct" because of the activities against the Law No. 2863 on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property. After the complaint, the construction activities were halted but later resumed. The architects say that the contract for the construction of the commercial building should be cancelled and the construction should be stopped immediately, with the already built parts removed in proper techniques to prevent new damage to the caves (Bianet, 2022).
Since 2019, Cappadocia Area President Birol Incecikoz has been combating unauthorized construction and other activities in the region, removing close to 800 illegal buildings from the area and increasing surveillance. Nevertheless, illegal activities persist. With nearly 1,000 cases still awaiting judgment, Cappadocia’s authorities remain committed to eradicating all illegal buildings (Hacialioglu, 2024).
In 2024, the Ankara Regional Administrative Court suspended large-scale development plans for Cappadocia, based on concerns that the proposed plans would cause irreparable damage to the area. The suspended plans included the 1/25,000-scale Upper Scale Area Plan for Cappadocia, which was approved in October 2023 following some modifications in response to objections. However, the Chamber of Architects and the Chamber of City Planners opposed the plan, arguing that it would expose Cappadocia to development risks rather than protecting its historical heritage. Therefore, the groups filed for the plan’s cancellation (Devami, 2024).
Roads, Trails & Railroads
(High traffic rates and associated vibration threaten the natural values)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
According to the study by Demircivi (2017), vibrations and noise resulting from traffic threatens the natural values of the property. There are motorways near some valleys (e.g., Dervent valley) and some rock formations (e.g., fairy chimneys in Paşabağı and Ürgüp, and the ones on the Göreme-Ortahisar road). In order to resolve negative impacts resulting from the traffic, the passes on those roads may be limited to only tour buses or closed to all motor vehicles depending on the alternative roads.
A project by the Special Provincial Administration to increase the cadastral road between Göreme and Ortahisar from 5 and 7 meters wide to 10 meters has recently been completed. The project was approved by the Cappadocia Area Commission in October 2021. Following the expropriation works in the region, road construction was started by the Special Provincial Administration amidst public criticism due to potential damage to the site’s OUV. The road works were located 32 meters from the Hidden Church and 20 meters from the Fairy Chimneys. The road, which caused controversy, was opened to service in 2022 (Business Turkey, 2022). According to media reports, heavy machinery caused historical and cultural damage in the area. Near the junction of the Ortahisar-Göreme road with the Göreme museum road, new cracks have appeared in the dining hall located within a monastery complex. The vibrations caused by heavy machinery, coupled with the passage of tour buses and heavy trucks may accelerate the collapse of the cracked fairy chimney (Töre, 2023).
A project by the Special Provincial Administration to increase the cadastral road between Göreme and Ortahisar from 5 and 7 meters wide to 10 meters has recently been completed. The project was approved by the Cappadocia Area Commission in October 2021. Following the expropriation works in the region, road construction was started by the Special Provincial Administration amidst public criticism due to potential damage to the site’s OUV. The road works were located 32 meters from the Hidden Church and 20 meters from the Fairy Chimneys. The road, which caused controversy, was opened to service in 2022 (Business Turkey, 2022). According to media reports, heavy machinery caused historical and cultural damage in the area. Near the junction of the Ortahisar-Göreme road with the Göreme museum road, new cracks have appeared in the dining hall located within a monastery complex. The vibrations caused by heavy machinery, coupled with the passage of tour buses and heavy trucks may accelerate the collapse of the cracked fairy chimney (Töre, 2023).
Dams & Water Management/Use, Earth & Sediment Management, Weather & Climate Management
(Deterioration and erosion (natural and anthropogenic))
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
There is natural deterioration at geological formations and archaeological values due to wind and water erosion and human disturbance (Somuncu and Yigit, 2009). In recent years, due to construction of irrigation dams and ponds in the region, the humidity has been increasing which accelerates natural deterioration (IUCN Consultation, 2017; Erkan, 2022). In general erosion is a critical element of the natural values, and is the cause of the landforms. However, accelerated erosion is a threat. Additionally, increased humidity due to extensive surface water harms building materials and alters their reaction to climatic conditions. The changing groundwater level is another potential risk for the existing cultural heritage that may cause structural problems due to ground subsidence. Especially considering that water consumption per person has increased dramatically in recent years, the lack of sewage systems and the poor maintenance of existing systems bear significant risks. Change in land use is another factor that affects groundwater levels. Unsuitable crop choices and irrigation systems are contributing to this issue (Erkan, 2022).
Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops, Terrestrial Animal Farming, Ranching & Herding
(Grazing and vineyards)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
The RAPPAM 2009 report stated that grazing by sheep coming from surrounding villages occurred inside the WH site (Stanciu et al., 2009). Since it was scattered and the number of animals was descending, it was not considered as a high threat. No significant grazing has been reported in recent years (IUCN Consultation, 2017).
The Göreme Open Air Museum is surrounded by extensive vineyards, which are indispensable elements of the landscape. However, 71% of agricultural lands are cultivated using pesticides. The effect of agricultural activities on soil pollution also creates a high degree of ecological pressure on the WH site, while there may also be impacts on groundwater levels, which may contribute to structural problems due to ground subsidence (Ciftci et al., 2021; Erkan, 2022). The agricultural areas covering the northern part of the region are constantly expanding, shrinking the natural steppe areas (Doga Dernegi, 2020).
The Göreme Open Air Museum is surrounded by extensive vineyards, which are indispensable elements of the landscape. However, 71% of agricultural lands are cultivated using pesticides. The effect of agricultural activities on soil pollution also creates a high degree of ecological pressure on the WH site, while there may also be impacts on groundwater levels, which may contribute to structural problems due to ground subsidence (Ciftci et al., 2021; Erkan, 2022). The agricultural areas covering the northern part of the region are constantly expanding, shrinking the natural steppe areas (Doga Dernegi, 2020).
Potential threats to the site include earthquakes and other natural hazard, including sinkholes, which have been recorded more frequently recently. Droughts and extreme climatic events are expected due to the desertification of the region.
Geological Events, Severe Weather Events
(Natural hazards)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Earthquake damage to some of the cones and pillars over the years has previously been reported (UNESCO, Periodic Report, Cycle 01). Multiple factors contribute to other hazards, including sinkholes that have been more frequently seen in Anatolia in recent years (Demir & Keskin, 2020). Droughts and extreme climatic events are expected due to the desertification of the region. From October to December 2020, precipitation across the country measured 48% lower than the average for 1981–2010 (Erkan, 2022).
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
According to the 2019 law on the Cappadocia Area, the Commission contains one representative of the municipality and local people are able to participate in meetings as observers. However, their involvement in the development of area and management plans appears limited. Ata and Kuzuoglu (2022) also point to a disconnect between residents and decision-making processes.
Legal framework
In 2018 the transition to the Presidential Government System across the country centralized planning and public administration. Cappadocia underwent a different administrative restructuring in 2019 and the Law No. 7174 on Cappadocia Area entered into force in June 2019 (Şakar, 2022). The Culture and Tourism Ministry declared an area consisting of 86,000 hectares of land, including the Göreme National Park and the underground cities of Derinkuyu and Kaymaklı, as the “Cappadocia Area” within the framework of Law No. 7174, which was passed in the parliament to better protect the region.
The purpose and scope of this Law is to protect, develop, promote, transfer to future generations, plan, manage and arrange the considerations regarding auditing of geological/geomorphological texture and natural resource values with historical and cultural values of the Cappadocia Area (State Party of Turkey, 2024). However, when the Cappadocia Site Regulation was issued in 2020, architects warned that it would lead to the destruction of the historical sites by businesses and hotels (Bianet, 2022). In line with public criticism, the Court decided to suspend the execution of various plans including the 1/25,000-scale Upper Scale Area Plan for Cappadocia in 2024. The decision marks a critical juncture in the ongoing debate over how to best preserve Cappadocia’s unique cultural landscape while balancing developmental aspirations (Devami, 2024). The current state of the legal framework for the area encompassing the World Heritage site is unclear and raises concerns over the current level of protection for the OUV.
The purpose and scope of this Law is to protect, develop, promote, transfer to future generations, plan, manage and arrange the considerations regarding auditing of geological/geomorphological texture and natural resource values with historical and cultural values of the Cappadocia Area (State Party of Turkey, 2024). However, when the Cappadocia Site Regulation was issued in 2020, architects warned that it would lead to the destruction of the historical sites by businesses and hotels (Bianet, 2022). In line with public criticism, the Court decided to suspend the execution of various plans including the 1/25,000-scale Upper Scale Area Plan for Cappadocia in 2024. The decision marks a critical juncture in the ongoing debate over how to best preserve Cappadocia’s unique cultural landscape while balancing developmental aspirations (Devami, 2024). The current state of the legal framework for the area encompassing the World Heritage site is unclear and raises concerns over the current level of protection for the OUV.
Governance arrangements
In the past changes in legal administrative mechanisms, bureaucratic processes and confusion in responsibilities in Cappadocia and Turkey overall, led to an uncoordinated conservation framework for the WH site (Şakar, 2022). According to Law No. 7174 on Cappadocia Area, a Cappadocia Area Presidency and Commission were established to plan, carry out and execute all actions related to conservation in the area. The duties and authorities of Nevsehir KVKBK and TVK were transferred to the Cappadocia Area Commission, consisting of 11 permanent members with expertise in archaeology, art history, architecture, urban planning and regional planning, geology, law and biology. Administrative representatives are also included e.g. from Nevsehir Provincial Special Administration, General Directorate of Conservation and General Directorate of National Parks (Official Gazette, 2019). The law and reorganization for the Presidency of the area demonstrates a shift towards a new management model, which requires time to become operational. Under this development the Göreme National Park is no longer a national park and is integrated within the Cappadocia Area (Şakar, 2022). The effectiveness of the current model cannot be assessed at this time.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
In the past, the region had a multi-layered protection structure including designations as an Urban Site, Natural Site, Archaeological Site, World Heritage Site and National Park which were intertwined and overlapping in many areas. This impacted the status of the World Heritage site legally and administratively and in terms of local conservation dynamics (Şakar, 2022). The differing protection statuses resulted in the sharing of responsibility of protection and development across various institutions, which led to confusion of authority in inter-institutional relations (Şakar, 2022). This especially affected high-scale regional planning like the Environmental Plan and Long-Term Development Plan. With the 2019 Law establishing the Cappadocia Area, various plans, procedures and principles for the Cappadocia Area are being developed including: the Upper Scale Cappadocia Area Plan, Cappadocia Area Management Plan, Cappadocia Area Master Zoning Plans and Cappadocia Area Implementation Zoning Plans (Official Gazette, 2020). In 2021 the first meeting ‘High Scale Area Plans and Area Management Plan’ was held. The status of the plans is unknown, especially due to the recent court proceedings halting the execution of the Upper Scale Cappadocia Area Plan. The site is managed by the recently established Area of Cappadocia Commission and President.
Boundaries
Status of boundaries of the site was deemed adequate in the past (UNESCO, Periodic Report, Cycle 01), although the location and significance of boundaries was not always clear to local stakeholders (Demirçivi, 2017). With the more recent development of the Cappadocia Area, it remains to be seen how the WH site boundaries will be communicated in the various plans and regulations and on the ground.
Overlapping international designations
N/A
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
No recent Committee decisions.
Climate action
According to the most recent periodic report, the management plan will be developed to address drought, desertification and temperature changes specifically through soil and water conservation projects, disaster prevention activities and action plans to minimize deformations on rock surfaces due to sudden temperature differences (State Party of Turkey, 2024). The extent to which these proposed actions have been developed and implemented is unclear.
Management plan and overall management system
Various plans, procedures and principles for the Cappadocia Area are being developed including: the Upper Scale Cappadocia Area Plan, Cappadocia Area Management Plan, Cappadocia Area Master Zoning Plans and Cappadocia Area Implementation Zoning Plans (Official Gazette, 2020). In 2021 the first meeting ‘High Scale Area Plans and Area Management Plan’ was held. The status of the plans is unknown and there has been public discontent, including court proceedings questioning the balance of conservation and development of the area. The site is managed by the recently established Area of Cappadocia Commission and President.
Originally, the management plan of the National Park was prepared in 1971 however there were inadequacies in implementation of the plan (MoFW 2015). The management plan was revised in 2013, however as the area is no longer designated as a national park, it is assumed that current management is not based on the 2013 management plan.
Originally, the management plan of the National Park was prepared in 1971 however there were inadequacies in implementation of the plan (MoFW 2015). The management plan was revised in 2013, however as the area is no longer designated as a national park, it is assumed that current management is not based on the 2013 management plan.
Law enforcement
According to the most recent periodic report, regular inspections are carried out in line with complaints (State Party of Turkey, 2024). This seems to indicate that efforts are geared towards reacting to potential deliberate destruction of heritage rather than actively prohibiting such incidences.
Control and site supervision is deemed as low by site visitors (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023) and other researchers (Uçar, 2020). Especially the security problem in valleys and natural historical places has been highlighted. There have been negative issues such as harassment, theft, and murder against foreign tourists in the valleys in recent years, highlighting urgent problems that need to be solved through improved law enforcement. However, security measures such as security cameras or lighting are still insufficient (Yetiş et al., 2022).
Control and site supervision is deemed as low by site visitors (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023) and other researchers (Uçar, 2020). Especially the security problem in valleys and natural historical places has been highlighted. There have been negative issues such as harassment, theft, and murder against foreign tourists in the valleys in recent years, highlighting urgent problems that need to be solved through improved law enforcement. However, security measures such as security cameras or lighting are still insufficient (Yetiş et al., 2022).
Sustainable finance
According to the latest periodic report, the administrative budget is being increased to meet the region’s needs (State Party of Turkey, 2024).
Staff capacity, training and development
Inadequate staffing was noted in RAPPAM 2009 assessment (Stanciu et al., 2009), and this inadequacy has been consistently stated since, for example in the management effectiveness assessment conducted by Ministry of Forest and Water Affairs in 2015 and in Demirçivi (2017).
The knowledge and interest of staff is deemed as low by site visitors (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023) and according to Uçar (2020) there is an insufficient number of qualified technical staff working in the local authorities. With the restructuring of the governance framework, it remains to be seen how the World Heritage site will be managed.
The knowledge and interest of staff is deemed as low by site visitors (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023) and according to Uçar (2020) there is an insufficient number of qualified technical staff working in the local authorities. With the restructuring of the governance framework, it remains to be seen how the World Heritage site will be managed.
Education and interpretation programmes
There are some education and interpretation programmes in place and according to the State Party, further programmes are planned to enhance the understanding of local people for the historical and cultural value of the region (State Party of Turkey, 2024). Göreme Opean Air Museum is the most visited place in the region. It could improve the integration of newer technologies and requires modernization overall (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023). A strategy to promote the area and inform visitors of the unique values would greatly enhance the visitor experience (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023) - see tourism section below.
Tourism and visitation management
The World Heritage site is receiving an increasing number of tourists and according to media reports, officials are aiming to increase visitation further, up to 7 million visitors annually (currently visitation lies at approximately 2-4 million) (State Party of Turkey, 2024; Daily Sabah, 2020).
According to the management effectiveness report from 2015, the management of tourism and visitors including providing proper infrastructure is not effective. These issues persist with key problems being: 1) the absence of tourism monitoring units and the active use of tourism information offices to monitor the economic, social, and cultural effects of tourism activities carried out in the region; 2) failure to attract national and international investments to the region; 3) the damage of ATV and safari tours to the regional texture and the lack of control over the execution of these activities in a particular region; 4) lack of use-protection balance and security problem in museums and ruins; 5) inadequate information system for the sector and inaccuracy of statistical data; 6) deficiencies in destination branding and image creation; 7) extension of the tourism season and overnight stay in the region (Yetiş et al., 2022).
Although uncontrolled tourism and pressure from mass tourism rank as the highest threats to the site’s OUV, there is no visitor management plan for the area (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023). Insufficient cooperation among tourism stakeholders and lack of inter-institutional communication are among the outstanding problems preventing effective tourism and visitation management (Yetiş et al., 2022). There is no study on the tourism monitoring units planned to be established in the region and tourism information offices are still not actively used. An active strategy has not yet been determined to set up a tourism information system in the region and the information system for the sector. There is still no practice in tourism businesses for sustainable and responsible tourism. The people of the region and their investors are far from this understanding with illegal construction and illegal works along with lacking waste management continuing to be an issue (Yetis et al., 2022). Furthermore, there is a lack of training in the field of tourism. To this end, steps have been taken to establish a "Tourism Strategy and Research Center" in cooperation with the Tourism Academicians Association, Tourism NGOs and NEVÜ Tourism Research Institute to identify key knowledge gaps and develop approaches to train qualified sustainable tourism stakeholders (Yetiş et al., 2022). Furthermore, there is now a Turkish Tourism and promotion Agency, which aims to develop a Turkish Sustainable Tourism Scheme.
According to the management effectiveness report from 2015, the management of tourism and visitors including providing proper infrastructure is not effective. These issues persist with key problems being: 1) the absence of tourism monitoring units and the active use of tourism information offices to monitor the economic, social, and cultural effects of tourism activities carried out in the region; 2) failure to attract national and international investments to the region; 3) the damage of ATV and safari tours to the regional texture and the lack of control over the execution of these activities in a particular region; 4) lack of use-protection balance and security problem in museums and ruins; 5) inadequate information system for the sector and inaccuracy of statistical data; 6) deficiencies in destination branding and image creation; 7) extension of the tourism season and overnight stay in the region (Yetiş et al., 2022).
Although uncontrolled tourism and pressure from mass tourism rank as the highest threats to the site’s OUV, there is no visitor management plan for the area (Toksöz and Birdir, 2023). Insufficient cooperation among tourism stakeholders and lack of inter-institutional communication are among the outstanding problems preventing effective tourism and visitation management (Yetiş et al., 2022). There is no study on the tourism monitoring units planned to be established in the region and tourism information offices are still not actively used. An active strategy has not yet been determined to set up a tourism information system in the region and the information system for the sector. There is still no practice in tourism businesses for sustainable and responsible tourism. The people of the region and their investors are far from this understanding with illegal construction and illegal works along with lacking waste management continuing to be an issue (Yetis et al., 2022). Furthermore, there is a lack of training in the field of tourism. To this end, steps have been taken to establish a "Tourism Strategy and Research Center" in cooperation with the Tourism Academicians Association, Tourism NGOs and NEVÜ Tourism Research Institute to identify key knowledge gaps and develop approaches to train qualified sustainable tourism stakeholders (Yetiş et al., 2022). Furthermore, there is now a Turkish Tourism and promotion Agency, which aims to develop a Turkish Sustainable Tourism Scheme.
Sustainable use
There is no information regarding the sustainable use of the site, however the impacts from tourism have been highlighted as a high threat to the OUV and therefore requires active management.
Monitoring
Overall, there is a lack of any monitoring within the site for natural values (Demirçivi, 2017). Efforts to preserve Cappadocia’s natural and historical features include the detailed documentation of the region’s fairy chimneys. Identification cards for each fairy chimney are being prepared, which involves assessing their current condition, potential erosion issues, and precise location coordinates. So far, around 30 to 35 percent of these formations have been catalogued (Hacialioglu, 2024).
Research
Several universities are involved in some research activities, including regarding tourism and plant diversity. The area between Nevşehir and Avanos has been the focus of new plant discoveries in recent years and efforts are underway to establish a plant museum in Cappadocia. Morphological studies are ongoing with a regular flow of international publications (Alkan, 2024).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
The overall low efficiency of management effectiveness (Stanciu et al., 2009; MoEF, 2015; Demirçivi, 2017) also hinders effective responses to threats originating from outside the site. With the more recent developments to establish the Cappadocia Area, along with a change in management and governance structures, it is difficult to determine the effectiveness of the current system in addressing threats beyond the World Heritage site boundaries. However, there is a concern that development is being prioritised over the protection of the natural and cultural values of the site (Bianet, 2022; Devami, 2024).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
In order to ensure effective management and protection, there is a strong need to formulate new management strategies and policies. In the past the RAPPAM 2009 and management effectiveness report in 2015, highlighted that management effectiveness of Göreme National Park is lower than average. According to the RAPPAM of 2009 (Stanciu et al., 2009), the inventory, visitor management, staff management (training) of the area, number of staff and collaboration with locals are not adequate. As such, a unified Management Plan for the area is needed to understand, monitor, and respond to threats in a consistent manner (Demirçivi, 2017). These concerns have not changed. Although the establishment of the Cappadocia Area along with a Committee and President aims to improve on previous issues of multiple jurisdictions and responsibilities, the loss of the National Park status may open up the area to development pressures. With the Upper Scale Cappadocia Area Plan execution being suspended, there is currently no overall framework to guide site management and protection.
The area was established as a historical National Park in order to protect and develop the national and cultural elements of the area for scientific and aesthetic reasons. In 2019, the site was subsumed into the Cappadocia Area which was established by law, which removed the National Park status. The purpose and scope of this Law is to protect, develop, promote, transfer to future generations, plan, manage and arrange the considerations regarding auditing of geological/geomorphological texture and natural resource values with historical and cultural values of the Cappadocia Area. However, when the Cappadocia Site Regulation was issued in 2020, architects warned that it would lead to the destruction of the historical sites by businesses and hotels. In line with public criticism, the Court has decided to suspend the execution of various plans including the 1/25,000-scale Upper Scale Area Plan for Cappadocia in 2024. The decision marks a critical juncture in the ongoing debate over how to best preserve Cappadocia’s unique cultural landscape while balancing developmental aspirations. The current state of the legal framework for the area encompassing the World Heritage site is unclear and raises concerns over the current level of protection for the OUV. Furthermore, there is lack of clarity of what guides the current management and the extent to which sufficient and qualified staff are present to prevent illegal activities and manage increasing tourism.
Superlative natural features and spectacular landscape
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Although in the past, growing awareness among the stakeholders, both public and private, led to a better protection of the natural beauty of the Göreme Valley and its surroundings (WCMC, 2011), there is acute concern over the future protection of the OUV due to changes in the legal framework and issues in law enforcement (Ciftci et al., 2021; Yetiş et al., 2022). Furthermore, illegal infrastructure development continues to impact on the natural landforms (Hacialioglu, 2024). Overall, there is an urgent need to prioritise the protection of the site including its geological and natural features to address development risks associated with tourism, commercial and residential infrastructure and associated transportation routes (Devami, 2024).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
The WH site is receiving an increasing number of visitors, currently reported at 2-4 million annually. The provision of hotels and services for these visitors in the absence of a management plan and trained park personnel is increasingly becoming a problem, as was the case in the past. There is acute concern over the future protection of the OUV due to changes in the legal framework and issues in law enforcement. Illegal infrastructure development continues to impact on the natural landforms and the lack of an overall framework to guide management is of concern.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
Good
Improving
The area between Nevşehir and Avanos has been the focus of new plant discoveries in recent years. A new endemic plant species belonging to the family of Plantaginaceae was identified. The new species, named Nevsehirensis, was published in the Journal of Herb Systematic Botany (Alkan, 2022). The WH site has a special position in the world in terms of habitats created by ecological, altitude and geomorphological differences and it is likely additional species will be identified in the future. In 2022 the ‘Cappadocia Plants Exhibition' was opened at Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University (NEVU), which introduced the plant varieties, most of which are endemic, with the word "Cappadocia" in their Latin names, demonstrating the rising public interest in the region’s plant diversity. Furthermore, in 2024 three new plant species were identified in the region known for its fairy chimneys and tuff rock structure, which may have benefited the vegetation and paved the way for the emergence of species unique to the region. The discoveries contain three new endemic species from the floral Honeydew (Lamiaceae) and herbaceous Irises (Iridaceae) family (Alkan, 2024). Efforts are underway to establish a plant museum in Cappadocia and morphological studies are ongoing with a regular flow of international publications.
Additional information
Wilderness and iconic features,
Sacred natural sites or landscapes
Göreme is an exceptional representation of the close relationship between man and his environment in particular as regards the use of underground caves as churches for worship (UNESCO, Periodic Report, Cycle 01).
There are damages to ruins and uncontrolled tourism.
Sacred natural sites or landscapes
Rare and natural formations and features of exceptional beauty are found in the landscape, reflecting varying conditions of resistance as well as the works of man (UNESCO, Periodic Report, Cycle 01).
Outdoor recreation and tourism
Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia receive well millions of visitors a year.
The heavy pressure of mass tourism represents however also a threat.
The Cappadocia region, bordered by Kızılırmak to the north, Yeşilhisar to the east, Hasan and Melendiz Mountains to the south, Aksaray to the west and Kırşehir to the northwest, has been a continuous settlement area since the Chalcolithic Age. The most important feature of the area is the extraordinary rock formations formed by the wind and water erosion of the Erciyes and Hasan Mountain tuffs and the rock-carved spaces that are warm in winter and cool in summer, and therefore have suitable internal climate conditions for all seasons. Göreme became an important center of Christianity, especially between the 7th and 13th centuries, with the settlement of Christians escaping from oppression. The areas included in the UNESCO World Heritage List include Göreme National Park, Derinkuyu and Kaymaklı Underground Cities, Karain Dovecotes, Karlık Church, Yeşilöz Theodoro Church and Soğanlı Archaeological Site. A spectacular landscape entirely sculpted by erosion with sacred landscapes in the form of subterranean dwellings and places of worship. The wilderness value is manifested in natural formations and features of exceptional beauty).
| № | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Cappadocia Area Presidency | Strategic Plan at a Glance Mission: To carry out studies to protect and develop the unique historical, cultural and natural values in the Cappadocia area, to ensure that these values are transferred to future generations, and to increase the recognition of the region in the world. Vision: While protecting the historical, cultural, and natural riches of the Cappadocia area and transferring them to future generations, to increase the share and recognition of the region in world tourism with the destination management model. Core Values: • Multi-Stakeholder Management Approach • Result Orientation • Organizational Harmony • Development and Development Orientation • Strategic Perspective • Impartiality • Rationality |
https://kapadokyaalan.ktb.gov.tr/Eklenti/122488,kab2024-2028-sprevizektb11012024pdf.pdf?0
|
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
Alkan, B. (2022). Literatüre giren endemik bitkiye Nevşehir'in adı verildi. Anadolu Agency (AA). Published online 4 July 2022. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/kultur/literature-giren-endemik-bi…
|
| 2 |
Alkan, B. (2024). Kapadokya'da 3 endemik bitki türü keşfedildi, birine "Hacıbektaş" adı verildi. Anadolu Agency (AA). Published online 17 May 2024. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/bilim-teknoloji/kapadokyada-3-ende…
|
| 3 |
Ata, S., & Kuzuoglu, S. (2022). Tourism, Conservation and Resident Well-being in Cappadocia (Turkey): An Exploratory Research. In Tourism Planning and Development in the Middle East (pp. 78-94). GB: CABI.
|
| 4 |
Bianet (2022). Destruction in Cappadocia: Architects call for halt of commercial building, hotel projects. Bianet. Published online 11 April 2022. Available at: https://bianet.org/haber/destruction-in-cappadocia-architec…
|
| 5 |
Business Turkey (2022). Road in the focus of reactions in Cappadocia finally opened. Business Turkey. Published online 19 December 2022. Available at: https://businessturkeytoday.com/road-in-the-focus-of-reacti…
|
| 6 |
CEYLAN, S. Rekreasyonel Amaçlı Yapılan ATV ve Jip Turlarının Göreme (Kapadokya) Üzerindeki Baskısı. International Rural Tourism and Development Journal. E-ISSN: 2602-4462 6(2) 2022
|
| 7 |
Ciftci, C., Shumka, L., Papastefani, A., & Argun, M. O 46. EVALUATION OF THE GOREME NATURAL PARK IN TURKEY THE FRAMEWORK OF ECOLOGICAL PLANNING. PROCEEDING BOOK, 275.
|
| 8 |
Daily Sabah (2020). Cappadocia breaks record in tourist numbers with over 3.8 million visitors. Daily Sabah, Istanbul Published online 7 January 2020. Available at: https://www.dailysabah.com/tourism/2020/01/07/cappadocia-br…
|
| 9 |
Demirçivi B. M. (2017). Göreme Millî Parkı ve Kapadokya Kayalık ölgeleri’ne İlişkin UNESCO Raporu Değerlendirmeleri ve Öneriler, Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 4 (2), 91-106. (In Turkish with English abstract and summary of key findings).
|
| 10 |
Devami, H. (2024). Court halts development plans for Cappadocia. Hürriyet Daily News. Published online 3 August 2024. Available at: https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/court-halts-development-p…
|
| 11 |
Erkan, Y. (2022, October). Change in Water Technology in Anatolia: From Use to Energy, Conflicts to Climate Action. In 50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility–Conflict & Reconciliation (pp. 309-320). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
|
| 12 |
Hacialioglu, S. (2024). 800 illegal buildings demolished to preserve Türkiye’s gem Cappadocia. Türkiye Today. Published online 18 September 2024. Available at: https://www.turkiyetoday.com/business/800-illegal-buildings…
|
| 13 |
IUCN/WCMC Data Sheets Jan 1988 (updated 8-1995, 10-2007, May 2011)
|
| 14 |
MoFW. 2015. Site Management and Management Effectiveness in Göreme National Park. Ministry of Forest and Water Affairs Department of National Parks Division of Site Management, Ankara.
|
| 15 |
NEVÜ (2022). NEVÜ’de “Kapadokya Bitkileri Sergisi” Açıldı. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi (NEVÜ). Published online 29 December 2022. Available at: https://www.nevsehir.edu.tr/tr/37716
|
| 16 |
Official Gazette (2019). Law on the Cappadocia Area. Law No. 7174 Adoption Date: 23/5/2019. Official Gazette Number 30791. Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/06/20190601-11…
|
| 17 |
Official Gazette (2020). KAPADOKYA ALAN PLANLARI YAPIMI VE YÜRÜRLÜĞÜNE İLİŞKİN USUL VE ESASLAR HAKKINDA YÖNETMELİK. Adoption Date: 11/07/2020. Official Gazette Number 31182. Available at: https://kapadokyaalan.ktb.gov.tr/TR-289498/kapadokya-alan-p…
|
| 18 |
Sağlamdin, Çoşkun (2022). Kapadokya'yı bekleyen tehlikenin farkında mısınız? Adoption Date: 11/05/2025 (3 August 2022) Available at: https://www.lalehaber.com/yazar/coskun-saglamdin/kapadokyay…
|
| 19 |
Somuncu, M., Yişit, T. 2009. The evaluation of tourism from sustainability perspective in the world heritage of Göreme National Park and Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Vth National Geography Symposium Proceedings: 387-402, 16- 17 October 2008, Ankara.
|
| 20 |
Stanciu, E., Avcıoğlu, B., Lise, Y. 2009. Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Areas Management in Turkey: 2009 Assessment and 2005-2009 Comparison. WWF-Turkey, İstanbul, Turkey (in Turkish)
|
| 21 |
State Party of Turkey (2024). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/357/documents/
|
| 22 |
Toksöz, D., & Birdir, K. (2023). Göreme Milli Parkı ve Kapadokya Kayalık Bölgeleri’ndeki Ziyaretçi Etki Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Yerli Ziyaretçiler Tarafından Değerlendirilmesi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 8(1), 64-77.
|
| 23 |
Töre, V.O. (2023). Irreversible Damage to UNESCO World Heritage Site, Cappadocia, Due to Road Construction. Ftn News. Published online 18 September 2023. Available at: https://ftnnews.com/travel-news/news-from-turkey/irreversib…
|
| 24 |
Uçar, T. (2020). Türkiye'de Dünya Miras Alanlarının Korunmasında Yönelik Çalışmaların Etkinliği: Kapadokya Örneği (Master's thesis, Maltepe University (Turkey)).
|
| 25 |
Yetiş, Ş. A., Deniz, G., Aydın, Ş., & Yılmaz, F. D. (2022). An Evaluation on the Problems and Solutions of Cappadocia Regional Tourism. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 71-83.
|
| 26 |
Yildirim, I., & Eren, D. (2024). Recreational carrying capacity calculations: An application on Cappadocia rocky sites. Anaïs Brasileiros de Estudos Turísticos: ABET, 14(1), 4.
|
| 27 |
Şakar, F. S. (2022). KAPADOKYA DOĞAL VE KÜLTÜREL MİRAS ALANLARININ KORUMA VE PLANLAMA SÜREÇLERİ. TUBA-KED: Turkish Academy of Sciences, Journal of Cultural Inventory, (26).
|