Parc national tadjik (montagnes du Pamir)

Country
Tajikistan
Inscribed in
2013
Criteria
(vii)
(viii)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
© M Emslie-Smith

Summary

2025 Conservation Outlook

Finalised on
11 oct 2025
Good with some concerns
The outstanding universal value and natural attributes of the World Heritage site are assessed as currently being of low concern, however this is more an assumption than a reliable statement due to a lack of monitoring data. The large size, alpine wilderness character, and low resident population of the property ensure that overall threats from human activities are minor and localized. The influence of accelerated global warming on the melting of the Pamir glaciers is a significant threat in the medium- to longer-term. Intensive grazing continues to be a problem, especially for wild ungulates in the park, also due to zones not being adhered to or understood sufficiently by local communities. Furthermore, over the past 15 years, the intensive harvest of Teresken within a 40 km radius around local settlements has catapulted the region into a concerning trajectory of desertification and biodiversity loss. Other threats from illegal hunting, trophy hunting and increasing tourism are currently low but need careful monitoring and control. Current management is significantly hindered by inadequate budget for staff, training, and equipment. The long-term outlook for the Pamir glaciers through accelerated global warming is also of concern.

Current state and trend of VALUES

Low Concern
The outstanding universal value and natural attributes of the World Heritage site are assessed as currently being in a good and stable state, however this is more an assumption than a reliable statement due to a lack of monitoring data. The scenic and aesthetic values are likely to be intact throughout the site due to the overall remoteness, however there is evidence that existing resource use has been increasing in recent years leading to persistent degradation of the summer and winter mountain pastures.

Overall THREATS

Low Threat
The large size, alpine wilderness character, and low resident population of the property ensure that overall threats from human activities are minor and localized. The influence of accelerated global warming on the melting of the Pamir glaciers is a significant threat in the medium- to longer-term. Intensive grazing continues to be a problem, especially for wild ungulates in the park, also due to zones not being adhered to or understood sufficiently by local communities. Currently, herders graze livestock at 3500–4500 masl, in habitats also used by different wildlife species, for example, ibex Capra sibirica and Marco Polo sheep Ovis ammon polii. Rangers acknowledged that the extensive livestock grazing areas directly compete with wildlife grazing areas, but they also pointed out that herders do not have other places to graze their livestock. By implementing different co-management schemes and alternative grazing practices (e.g. rotational grazing), the park would have the opportunity to manage its pasture resources more sustainably. There is also summer grazing on narrow riparian grassland strips, and some hay-making close to the small villages in the Traditional Use Zone. Furthermore, over the past 15 years, the intensive harvest of Teresken within a 40 km radius around local settlements has catapulted the region into a concerning trajectory of desertification and biodiversity loss. Other threats from illegal hunting, trophy hunting and increasing tourism are currently low but need careful monitoring and control. The breaching of Lake Sarez through a major earthquake or other natural event is a potential threat of exceptional concern and international interest. There have also been ongoing discussions around utilising the water from Lake Sarez, in the Tajik National Park to provide Central Asian countries with clean drinking water. It would need to be determined how such drinking water is to be extracted and the potential impacts on the site’s OUV need to be carefully assessed prior to any developments.

Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT

Some Concern
The greatest protection for the World Heritage site stems from its remoteness and impenetrable mountain wilderness character. A satisfactory legal framework for protection and a management system is in place but effective management is severely hampered by an inadequate budget and deficiencies in staff training and operational equipment. Lack of available information on the current management system makes it difficult to assess the overall effectiveness, however reports of increasing illegal and unsustainable resource use within park boundaries indicates that management has thus far not been effective at maintaining the OUV.

Full assessment

Click the + and - signs to expand or collapse full accounts of information under each topic. You can also view the entire list of information by clicking Expand all on the top left.

Description of values

Alpine wilderness of high glaciated mountains

Criterion
(vii)
The Pamir Mountains are the third highest mountain ecosystem in the world after the Himalaya and Karakorum Ranges and include the world’s longest valley glacier outside of the Polar Regions. The Tajik National Park property, which encompasses virtually all of the Pamir Mountain ranges, represents one of the largest high mountain protected areas in the Palearctic Realm. Among the many, often large, glaciers of Inner Asia, the Fedchenko Glacier is the longest glacier in the world outside of the Polar Regions. The visual combination of some of the deepest gorges in the world, surrounded by rugged glaciated peaks, as well as the alpine desert and lakes of the Pamir high plateaux adds up to an alpine wilderness of exceptional natural beauty and the extreme aridity of the climate has kept the area virtually free of impacts from agriculture and permanent human settlement. (TNPa, 2012; IUCN, 2013)

High altitude lakes

Criterion
(vii)
Lake Sarez and Karakul Lake are superlative natural phenomena. The Pamir highlands are subject to frequent and strong earthquakes and the highly active tectonics have produced a geologically dynamic terrain. The most impressive result of this tectonic activity, Lake Sarez, was created by an earthquake-generated landslide of an estimated six billion tonnes of material, is impounded behind the highest natural dam in the world, and is possibly the youngest deep water alpine lake in the world. Lake Karakul is likely to be the highest large lake of meteoric origin. (TNPa, 2012; IUCN, 2013).

Landform juxtaposition of heavily-glaciated high peaks, high plateaux with an alpine desert character, and deep gorges

Criterion
(viii)
The juxtaposition in one protected area of so many high mountains, valley glaciers, and deep river gorges alongside the cold continental desert environment of the high plateau landforms provides for a unique geomorphic environment. A wide range of glacial and periglacial landforms and processes are apparent including rock glaciers of different kinds, areas of extensive permafrost and patterned ground. An outstanding landform feature of the property’s geologically dynamic terrain is Lake Sarez. It is of international scientific and geomorphological hazard significance because of the on-going geological processes influencing its stability, and the sort of lacustrine ecosystem which will develop over time. Tajik National Park furthermore offers a unique opportunity for the study of plate tectonics and continental subduction phenomena thereby contributing to our fundamental understanding of earth building processes (World Heritage Commitee, 2013).
Significant habitat for wild crop plants and fruit trees, snow leopard, and Marco Polo argali among others
Only 10% of Tajik NP is covered by biogenic landscapes (i.e. landscapes formed under the influence of living organisms), the rest is largely barren rock or ice. The lower western valleys do contain areas of wild varieties of crop plants in the Central Asian ‘Vavilov Centre of Diversity’ (TNPa, 2012). The fauna displays high endemism. It is reported that the park is home to over 33 mammal species, 162 bird species, four fish species, three reptile species and one amphibian species with several subspecies. The most prominent and notable mammal is the snow leopard (Uncia uncia). The Marco Polo argali sheep (Ovis ammon polii) and Siberian ibex (Capra sibirica), tolai hare (Lepus tolai pamirensis), Tibetan wolf (Canis lupus laniger), fox (Vulpes vulpes ferganensis), Asiatic wild dog (Cuon alpinus), Himalayan brown bear (Ursus arctos isabellinus), alpine weasel (Mustela altaica), least weasel (Mustela nivalis pallida), stone marten (Martes foina intermedia), Asian badger (Meles leucurus), Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra), Turkestan lynx (Lynx lynx) and wild boar (Sus scrofa davidi). There are about five known species of rodent, namely, the Pamir vole (Microtus juldaschi), grey hamster (Cricetulus migratorius coereulescens), long-tailed marmot (Marmota caudata), big-eared pika (Ochotona macrotis) and silvery vole (Alticola argentatus) are other mammals. The avian community is also very fascinating as a total of 162 bird species have been recorded. These include the mountain goose (Anser anser), Himalayan griffon vulture (Gyps himalayensis), bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), Central Asian saker falcon (Falco cherrug coatsi) and Tibetan snow cock (Tetraogallus tibetanus). Pallas's sand grouse (Syrrhaptes tibetanus), the endemic Pamir sand plover (Charadrius mongolus pamirensis), the brown-headed gull (Larus brunnicephalus), the snow pigeon (Columba leuconota) and four endemic passerines also recorded within this WHS. (WII, n.d.).

Assessment information

Low Threat
The large size, alpine wilderness character, and low resident population of the property ensure that overall threats from human activities are minor and localized. The influence of accelerated global warming on the melting of the Pamir glaciers is a significant threat in the medium- to longer-term. Intensive grazing continues to be a problem, especially for wild ungulates in the park, also due to zones not being adhered to or understood sufficiently by local communities. Currently, herders graze livestock at 3500–4500 masl, in habitats also used by different wildlife species, for example, ibex Capra sibirica and Marco Polo sheep Ovis ammon polii. Rangers acknowledged that the extensive livestock grazing areas directly compete with wildlife grazing areas, but they also pointed out that herders do not have other places to graze their livestock. By implementing different co-management schemes and alternative grazing practices (e.g. rotational grazing), the park would have the opportunity to manage its pasture resources more sustainably. There is also summer grazing on narrow riparian grassland strips, and some hay-making close to the small villages in the Traditional Use Zone. Furthermore, over the past 15 years, the intensive harvest of Teresken within a 40 km radius around local settlements has catapulted the region into a concerning trajectory of desertification and biodiversity loss. Other threats from illegal hunting, trophy hunting and increasing tourism are currently low but need careful monitoring and control.
Utility & Service Lines
(Semi-natural water level control of Lake Yashikul for hydroelectricity generation outside property)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Summer water storage by small dam at outlet of Lake Yashikul (and release in winter) has local affect in lacustrine ecology (TNPb, 2012), with four species of fish reported to have disappeared from the lake while one species is close to disappearing (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Residential Areas
(Disturbances from settlements inside the site)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
There are five small villages in the upper reaches of the Bartang River; all other settlements are outside boundary. (TNPb, 2012). These villages are thought to have a cumulative population of around 3,500 people, which brings disturbance in the form of livestock grazing, poaching and collection of shrubs (teresken), which may cause localised soil erosion and reduce fodder for wild ungulates if not harvested sustainably. Due to the competition over the limited resources and trophy hunting, Marco Polo Sheep and Pamirian Ibex are gradually changing their migration routes to transition through Afghanistan to China (AKAH, 2022).
Recreational Activities
(Impact of tourism)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
There are currently only about 1200 visitors/year to the vast site. These are accommodated in villages just outside the boundary and their on-site impact is miniscule. If this number is increased to 3000/yr (as planned) it could start to impact on the natural resource of teresken plants, if the authorities do not substitute imported fuel for household use (IUCN, 2013).

There are great expectations of what tourism development could deliver in and around the TNP. The government of Tajikistan has been pushing tourism development over the last decade through different policies. Tourism activities in the park include cycling, travelling by motorbikes, trekking and mountaineering with little to no monitoring of their movements throughout the property (Shokirov et al. 2021). The use of the small number of 4WD roads/tracks within the site presents a low threat on fragile alpine desert plateau ecosystems if driving off-road. Waste disposal has presented difficulties for park management as there are no waste disposal systems and littering has impacted wildlife behaviour and the aesthetic values of the park (Shokirov et al. 2021).
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals
(Trophy hunting)
Other targeted species names
Marco Polo argali (Ovis ammon polii); Siberian ibex (Capra sibirica)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Past estimates of the population of Marco Polo argali within the park were 5400 and Siberian ibex at around 4200. Efforts are being made to bring legal trophy hunting under strict control and ensure it is sustainable. Within the park this will most likely be around Karakul Lake, but efforts will be made to locate most of it outside the park (to the SE) (TNPb, 2012). Trophy hunts are commercially sold by different private hunting concessions or community-based conservancies. Based on counts and recommendations of the Academy of Sciences, the Government annually approves a quota for hunting of Marco Polo sheep. Currently, the quota is 110 heads (AKAH, 2022) although annual offtake looks to be lower (Parker et al. 2023). Overall the annual total of identified quotas for all huntable species is 126 according to Parker et al. (2023). The Pamirian ibex (Siberian ibex) has no conservation status. Its hunting is regulated on the basis of counts and Tajikistan laws on hunting and wildlife (AKAH, 2022).

Illegal hunting remains an issue. Traditionally, shooting of argali trophy heads has been seen as a ‘rite of passage’ into adulthood for young men. Apart from this, commercial poaching and illegal trophy hunting also occur. Recent improvements in enforcement have addressed this issue to some extent (IUCN Consultation, 2020), however due to the park’s size law enforcement faces difficulties (Shokirov et al. 2021). Since park boundaries are not clearly demarcated, it is possible that a hunting party could cross the boundaries of the park without knowing.
Terrestrial Animal Farming, Ranching & Herding
(Intensive grazing)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Livestock plays a crucial role in rural livelihood systems in Tajikistan, providing essential resources such as food, nutrition, and income and acting as a form of wealth and savings. However, rising livestock numbers are putting increasing pressure on already degraded pasturelands due to limited employment opportunities and weak markets for agricultural commodities in rural areas (Habibulloew et al. 2024). Intensive grazing continues to be a problem, especially for wild ungulates in the park, also due to zones not being adhered to or understood sufficiently by local communities (Shokirov et a. 2021). Currently, herders graze livestock at 3500–4500 masl, in habitats also used by different wildlife species, for example, ibex Capra sibirica and Marco Polo sheep Ovis ammon polii. Rangers acknowledged that the extensive livestock grazing areas directly compete with wildlife grazing areas, but they also pointed out that herders do not have other places to graze their livestock. By implementing different co-management schemes and alternative grazing practices (e.g. rotational grazing), the park would have the opportunity to manage its pasture resources more sustainably (Shokirov et al. 2021). There is also summer grazing on narrow riparian grassland strips, and some hay-making close to the small villages in the Traditional Use Zone (TNPb, 2012). The wider region of Tajik National Park is part of – Gorno-Badakhshan autonomous region – registered 122,441 heads of cattle and 411,482 heads of small cattle as of 2018, with significant part of this cattle recorded in the Murgab district, where the main territory of Tajik National Park is located. It is noteworthy that the number of cattle in the region increased by 57% compared with the Soviet time, and there are state programs for cattle breeding, so the numbers of cattle are expected to further increase. Cattle breeding is the main income source for local people living in or near the protected area. Overgrazing leads to degradation and potential desertification (IUCN Consultation, 2020). It is estimated that the populations of Marco Polo sheep in the area are significantly affected by grazing due to the depletion of resources and land degradation (AKAH, 2022).
Changes in Physical & Chemical Regimes, Changes in Temperature Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(More rapid melting of Pamir glaciers and associated damage from river flooding)
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Global warming is a potential threat already leading to higher meltwater levels in summer months. Glaciers, which occupy about 6% of the territory of Tajikistan, significantly affect the formation of runoff. Under the conditions of climate change (+1.5°), which has been occurring over the past 100 years, directly affecting the volume of glaciers - sources of food and water content of rivers, up to 10-20% feeding the flow of large rivers, and in dry and hot years, the contribution of glaciers to the water resources of individual rivers in the summer can reach up to 70%, leading to their annual melting (Khusrav et al. 2023). The associated disruption to the mountain valley 4WD roads was experienced by the IUCN field evaluators in 2013 and was raised as an access concern by the villagers in meetings with the field evaluators (IUCN, 2013). On 16-20 July 2015 the village of Barsem of Jamoat Suchan of the Gorno Badakhshan region was banished by the mud streams which had blocked the bed of the Gund River. 11 households were directly affected by the mud stream. The event also affected the highway connecting Tajikistan with China and Kyrgyzstan, 5 bridges, a medical point, a school, as well as agricultural lands and the main high-voltage (Chernomorets et.al., 2015, Shafiev G. V., 2016). Another impact of climate change is the immigration of fauna and flora which previously has not occurred in the site. Many species new to Tajikistani fauna, such as brahmina starling (Sturnia pagodarum), Tickell's thrush (Turdus unicolor) and Mongolian wolf (Canis lupus chanco) are reported to have moved to the territory of Pamir from the South, from Tiber, Ladaka and Penjab into orographically isolated Pamir.
Gathering, Harvesting & Controlling Terrestrial Plants & Fungi
(Harvesting of slow-growing teresken for household fuel)
Other targeted species names
Teresken (Krascheninnikovia ceratoides)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
It is difficult to solve this threat in the short-term. The socio-economic situation of the towns and villages on the Pamir Plateau needs to be improved and alternative sources of fuel, such as coal and gas) supplied (as was the case in Soviet times). 70% of rural households proximal to the park rely on Teresken as a quintessential fuel, particularly during the severe winter seasons. This dependency has catalysed an extraction of nearly 300,000 metric tons of Teresken biomass annually, a steep rise over the past decade (Habibulloev et al. 2024). Over the past 15 years, the intensive harvest of Teresken within a 40 km radius around local settlements has catapulted the region into a concerning trajectory of desertification and biodiversity loss.
Low Threat
The breaching of Lake Sarez through a major earthquake or other natural event is a potential threat of exceptional concern and international interest. There have been ongoing discussions around utilising the water from Lake Sarez, in the Tajik National Park to provide Central Asian countries with clean drinking water. It would need to be determined how such drinking water is to be extracted and the potential impacts on the site’s OUV need to be carefully assessed prior to any developments.
Conflict, Civil Unrest & Security Activities
(Border security issues)
Very Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Civil war and border security are very real issues in southern and western Gorno-Badakhshan. However, they are remote from the core areas of the property.
Residential Areas
(Water extraction from Lake Sarez for drinking water)
Data Deficient
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
There has been ongoing discussion around utilising the water from Lake Sarez, in the Tajik National Park to provide Central Asian countries with clean drinking water. In 2018, the presidents of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, Emomali Rahmon and Shavkat Mirziyoyev, first discussed using the Sarez freshwater as drinking water, during a visit by Rahmon to Uzbekistan. The nations subsequently commissioned a feasibility study from the Intergovernmental Joint Commission on Trade and Economic Cooperation. Discussions have continued in 2024 during a Tajik-Uzbek working group on the shared use of water from Central Asia’s transboundary rivers (Jalolova, 2024). It would need to be determined how such drinking water is to be extracted and the potential impacts on the site’s OUV need to be carefully assessed prior to any developments.
Geological Events
(Earthquakes)
High Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
The threat of a major earthquake breaching the Uzoi Dam and releasing the huge volume of water in Lake Sarez into the Bartang/Panj/Amu Darya river system is taken very seriously by the Tajik authorities and the governments of adjoining countries which may be affected) (TNPa, 2012; IUCN, 2013).
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Mostly Effective
Roughly 2000 people reside in five small villages (Bardachev, Rukhch, Pasor, Bopasor and Gudara) within the traditional use zone along the Bartang River, and 14,000 along the border of the limited economic use zone, mostly in the Murgab region (Shikorov et al. 2021). Communities in and around the site are not aware of the rules and regulations, and local leadership of the park does not promote co-management. Nevertheless, according to reports, stakeholders see the potential of shared management and would agree to take responsibility as stewards of the park if they were allowed to co-shape its regulations (Shikorov et al. 2021). Community-based management in Tajikistan beyond the borders of the WH site has engaged communities in wildlife conservation, provided income and jobs that lead people to value wild species and landscapes, and increased community awareness of wildlife. It has led to lower livestock densities, adoption of more sustainable grazing practices, pro-active community involvement in monitoring and anti-poaching, and more effective law enforcement in conservancy areas. This is because the income, jobs and other benefits from trophy hunting motivate and enable people to manage their grazing better to avoid or reduce grazing in areas that wild goats use, reduce incentives to poach, and motivate anti-poaching patrols and wildlife monitoring (Karimov, 2019). These developments may reduce the pressures from unsustainable resource use on the site itself.
Legal framework
Mostly Effective
Various protected area legislation since 1992 (up to 2005) has established the property as a protected legal entity (TNPb, 2012).
However, persistent degradation of summer and winter mountain pastures and a law enacted in June 2019, building on the 2013 law on fields aiming to decentralize pasture governance and facilitating establishment of Pasture User Unions, has been critiqued for lacking clarity in enforcement and inter-sectoral cooperation (Habubulloev et al. 2024).
Governance arrangements
Some Concern
Organization and governance in the TNP region are influenced by local administration, politics and traditional institutions. Most villages have an official administration organized by local governments, for example, heads of mahalla (the lowest level of governance) and jamoat (usually a governing body comprising a few villages). The Agha Khan Foundation has set up village organizations in most villages to implement local projects. Recently, the governments of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan have started to share decision-making processes and the management of local resources with local communities through decentralized governance approaches (Shokirov et al. 2021). Until now decision-making in the park is conducted in a top-down management approach. Usually, decisions are taken in the capital city of Dushanbe. Park rangers pointed out that orders usually come from the headquarters in the capital and are implemented by local officials in Murgab and Khorog. Park rangers usually report to the local offices that report back to the headquarters. Due to the park’s geographical isolation, decision-making and implementation processes are slow.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Mostly Effective
Measures to protect and use specially protected natural areas are provided for in the concepts, strategies and programs of socio-economic development. The planning of measures to protect and use specially protected natural areas is carried out taking into account the scientifically grounded combination of economic and environmental interests of society. Current and long-term planning of measures to protect and use specially protected natural areas is carried out as part of concepts, strategies and programs of socio-economic development on the basis of the state environmental program and the general scheme for the development and distribution of productive power, sectors of the economy, taking into account the natural resource potential of the Republic and its individual regions. Specially protected natural areas are taken into account when developing programs for the socio-economic development of regions, land management schemes and district planning. The planning of measures to protect and use specially protected natural areas is carried out by the ministries, departments and organizations that are in charge of these areas.
Boundaries
Some Concern
Due to the park’s size law enforcement faces difficulties (Shokirov et al. 2021). Since park boundaries are not clearly demarcated, it is possible that a hunting party could cross the boundaries of the park without knowing. The current TNP management plan includes four zones: a core zone, a traditional use zone, a limited economic use zone and a recreational zone (Shokirov et al. 2021).
Overlapping international designations
Data Deficient
Partial overlap with Karakul Lake Ramsar site. No information regarding the effectiveness or coordination of management between the designations was found.
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Data Deficient
Most of the 2010 WHC decisions regarding the deferral of the 2009 Tajik NP nomination (34COM 8B.3) were implemented (IUCN, 2013). However, in its 2013 decision to list, the committee again emphasized (37COM 8B.14) the need for “the State Party to marshal the necessary human and financial resources to ensure effective long term protection and management in accordance with the property’s management plan and to explore options to secure additional international financial assistance for capacity building” and encouraged “the State Party to cooperate with the neighbouring State Party of Kyrgyzstan to develop improved and sustainable tourism programmes which enhance visitor services, income and which foster community-based tourism development”. Since then no recent Committee decisions have been made.
Climate action
Mostly Effective
The Association of Nature Conservation Organizations of Tajikistan (ANCOT) is preparing a climate-smart National Action Plan for the Conservation of the Snow Leopard and its ecosystems for the period 2023-2025 together with partners within the frameworks of the UNEP Vanishing Treasures project and the UNDP / GEF project "Conservation and sustainable use of the Pamir-Alay and Tien Shan ecosystems for the protection of the snow leopard". The implementation of the National Action Plan for the Conservation of the Snow Leopard in Tajikistan will foster conservation of rare and endangered species (Kholmatov, 2022). There is also a national climate change adaptation strategy for the Republic of Tajikistan for the period up to 2030. In November 2023, the Government adopted the "National Program of the Republic of Tajikistan "Green Country" for 2023-2027", which was developed on the basis of the national strategy. This program defines the main directions of sustainable development of society to regulate the natural balance of greenhouse gases, adapt to the climate change process, transition to a green economy and ensure the maintenance of sustainable natural landscapes, the formation of biological diversity resources, sustainable management of environmental safety, as well as the creation of favorable conditions for a sustainable stage of transition to a green economy. The program provides for the planting of 65 million trees and shrubs on an area of more than 4 thousand by the end of 2025 (CABAR, 2024).
Management plan and overall management system
Data Deficient
Management responsibility is clearly that of the State Agency of Natural Protected Areas (SANPA) under the Committee for Environmental Protection under the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan (CEP RT). With the nomination dossier a management plan for 2012-2016 was submitted, however no updated plan could be found, neither an assessment of the implementation of the previous plan.
Law enforcement
Some Concern
Recent information on the effectiveness of law enforcement is not available however, there is evidence that illegal activites like hunting are likely occurring within the site due to insufficient monitoring and patrolling of the vast park area (Shirekov et al. 2021).
On 9 April 2025, the OSCE Programme Office in Dushanbe handed over 20 smartphones equipped with the SMART (Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool) system to the State Institution of Specially Protected Natural Areas under the Committee for Environmental Protection. The SMART system facilitates real-time data collection and analysis, enabling more informed decision-making in conservation management. This important initiative supports the State Institution in adopting SMART tools for managing protected areas, thereby strengthening conservation efforts and improving biodiversity monitoring. The new equipment will enhance the functionality and effective management of Specially Protected Areas. With advanced features such as spatial data visualization and automated reporting, trained personnel will be better equipped to carry out conservation activities efficiently, ultimately improving the protection and management of these vital ecological zones.
This initiative reflects the OSCE Programme Office in Dushanbe’s broader commitment to building the capacity of protected area staff and promoting the use of innovative technologies in environmental conservation (OSCE, 2025).
Sustainable finance
Serious Concern
This is the most serious management issue facing the property. The Tajik management authorities openly acknowledge this problem and are actively seeking increased budgets from their government, some income from trophy hunting and eco-tourism, and assistance from outside donor agencies (TNPa, 2012; TNPb, 2012; IUCN, 2013; IUCN Consultation, 2020).
According to Karimov (2019) the limited funding available for rangers has been a key restriction preventing effective law enforcment.
Staff capacity, training and development
Data Deficient
Current staff morale and commitment seem high (IUCN, 2013) but staff levels and training need to be increased. Again, this is limited by the low budget allocated to TNP. According to the nomination dossier there are three regional offices but only 54 staff. The TNP management team includes 3 directors and 3 chiefs of regional offices. The majority of staff, especially rangers, are selected from local people (TNPa, 2012). No updated information could be found.
Education and interpretation programmes
Data Deficient
There is a comprehensive state programme for the development of environmental education and awareness of the population of the Republic of Tajikistan for 2021-2025, however its implementation and the extent to which the programme incorporates the WH site and the related values is unclear.
Tourism and visitation management
Some Concern
Most eco-tourism is accommodated in the peripheral town of Murghab and the small villages. The relationship between the management agency and tourism guides seems effective at these low numbers (c.1200/yr). However, this would need to be re-assessed if the numbers increase to c.3000/yr as envisioned by national goals (TNPa, 2012). Tourism activities in the park include cycling, travelling by motorbikes, trekking and mountaineering with little to no monitoring of their movements throughout the property (Shokirov et al. 2021). Waste disposal has presented difficulties for park management as there are no waste disposal systems and littering has impacted wildlife behaviour and the aesthetic values of the park.
Sustainable use
Serious Concern
Due to the current low human pressure on the core of TNP, most pressure on the effectiveness of sustainable use measures is confined to the ‘traditional use’ and ‘limited economic use’ zones. 70% of rural households proximal to the park rely on Teresken as a quintessential fuel, particularly during the severe winter seasons. This dependency has catalysed an extraction of nearly 300,000 metric tons 40 of Teresken biomass annually, a steep rise over the past decade (Habibulloev et al. 2024). Assessing the Impact of Teresken Degradation on Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, and Economic Value of Tajik National Park. Over the past 15 years, the intensive harvest of Teresken within a 40 km radius around local settlements has catapulted the region into a concerning trajectory of desertification and biodiversity loss. Alternative options to provide energy are available, and need to be more actively promoted under international projects. Different priorities of the different user groups have led to friction between park rangers and local communities e.g. related to grazing, hunting and tourism. While herders want to graze and collect winter hay as much as possible to maximize their benefits from the pastures and impoverished surrounding communities illegally poach for meat. Community members stressed their need to make a living in this isolated part of the country. Since they have no rightful access to the park, they treat it as an exploitable, rather than a sustainable resource (Shokirov et al. 2021). According to Shokirov et al. (2021) an agreement system has potential in the region, which could be set up on a volunteer basis with clear rules and guidelines. For example, herders or communities could receive pasture use rights in exchange for practicing rotational grazing to avoid pasture degradation, or that a particular hunter might receive a certain number of hunting licences to hunt for the community in the winter months when the villagers need additional food in exchange for not hunting illegally.
Monitoring
Serious Concern
Monitoring of the site's values is currently severely limited by lack of budget (TNPb, 2012; IUCN Consultation, 2020)
Research
Some Concern
There is a need for better scientific studies to support TNP management (Shokirov et al. 2021). Currently, wildlife surveys in the territory of the TNP are conducted arbitrarily rather than systematically. Limitations in human and financial resources also restricts the extent of research activities (Shokirov et al. 2021). Most research or surveys had been carried out only when external donor agencies funded the project. For example, the NGO Panthera funded two studies based on snow leopard surveys between 2011 and 2017 within the territory of the TNP.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Serious Concern
Threats stemming from outside the site are mostly related to human-related pressures including illegal hunting, intensive grazing and unsustainable resource use. Climate change also poses a problem, that is beyond the direct control of the management authority. The lack of human and financial resources greatly limits the ability of staff to effectively monitor and enforce rules and regulations. Therefore, the current management system cannot be deemed effective in addressing threats from outside the site. Illegal and unsustainable resource use continues and has been exacerbated in recent years (Shokirov et al. 2021; Habibulloev et al. 2024).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Serious Concern
The park authority acknowledges that due to its vast territory the current number of staff is insufficient to ensure adequate control of the park. It seems this situation has not changes since inscription. The current situation is one of doing the best with the limited staff and equipment available. Most of the equipment is from Soviet times and should be written off, although some new SMART equipment has been provided by international donors. Limited Staff increases are proposed but any significant lift in management effectiveness is very dependent on budgetary increases, including overseas donors. Moreover the dependence on external funding and projects in the site has led to disjointed efforts towards conservation of the site's OUV, with duplication of effort and redundancy occurring in places (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
The greatest protection for the World Heritage site stems from its remoteness and impenetrable mountain wilderness character. A satisfactory legal framework for protection and a management system is in place but effective management is severely hampered by an inadequate budget and deficiencies in staff training and operational equipment. Lack of available information on the current management system makes it difficult to assess the overall effectiveness, however reports of increasing illegal and unsustainable resource use within park boundaries indicates that management has thus far not been effective at maintaining the OUV.

Alpine wilderness of high glaciated mountains

Data Deficient
Trend
Data Deficient
The scenic and aesthetic values are assumed to be intact, however a lack of data makes the comprehensive assessment of the state and trend difficult. Apart from limited recreation facilities in the small recreation zones, and traditional seasonal grazing, hay-making and regulated trophy hunting in the peripheral ‘use zones’, the site is free from excessive or inappropriate human development. Nevertheless, there is evidence that existing resource use has been increasing in recent years leading to persistent degradation of the summer and winter mountain pastures (Habibulloew et al. 2024).

High altitude lakes

Good
Trend
Stable
The water quality of the high altitude lakes is very high with no potential threats from human activity. The Uzoi natural dam impounding Lake Sarez is currently stable and its values intact. However, it is impossible to comment on the likelihood of a catastrophic earthquake which could have a major impact on its values. A complex network of sensors is in place and electronic signals indicating any failure of the Uzoi Dam would be relayed by satellite to a co-ordination centre tasked with broadcasting warnings to downstream populations.

Landform juxtaposition of heavily-glaciated high peaks, high plateaux with an alpine desert character, and deep gorges

Low Concern
Trend
Stable
The major Pamir glaciers, such as the Fedchenko do not appear to be melting at as rapid a rate as other northern hemisphere mountain ranges like the Caucasus or European Alps (TNPa, 2011). However, the trend is for global warming to continue and this has serious implications in the longer term for the supply of freshwater to the lowlands of Central Asia, given the critical regional importance of the ‘water-towers’ within the glaciers of the property (TNPa, 2012). Under the conditions of climate change (+1.5°), which has been occurring over the past 100 years, directly affecting the volume of glaciers - sources of food and water content of rivers, up to 10-20% feeding the flow of large rivers, and in dry and hot years, the contribution of glaciers to the water resources of individual rivers in the summer can reach up to 70%, leading to their annual melting (Khusrav et al. 2023).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Stable
The outstanding universal value and natural attributes of the World Heritage site are assessed as currently being in a good and stable state, however this is more an assumption than a reliable statement due to a lack of monitoring data. The scenic and aesthetic values are likely to be intact throughout the site due to the overall remoteness, however there is evidence that existing resource use has been increasing in recent years leading to persistent degradation of the summer and winter mountain pastures.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
Data Deficient
Data Deficient
The total habitat of the snow leopard in Tajikistan covers about 85,700 km2, which represents 60% of the total area of the country and about 2.8% of the current global range of the species. Snow leopards are widely distributed in the Pamir and Pamir-Alai systems. While localized camera-trap studies have been conducted, there is no reliable country-wide population estimate, but rather a guess of 250–280 (Saidov et al. 2024). Other estimated reach up to 450 individuals (Bolingbroke-Kent, 2022). Generally, the population appears to be stable. Across Tajikistan, ibex populations today are healthy only in certain very remote areas and in some well managed hunting areas (community or private). While the national population is unknown, fragmented surveys indicate a total population of approximately 18,000. Even in strict protected areas, ibex are subject to high levels of poaching for meat, livestock grazing, and degradation and fragmentation of habitat, and populations remain far below carrying capacity. The Tajik National Park (covering around 30% of the ibex habitat) is poorly protected due to the limited funding available for rangers, and there are no incentives for local communities to protect ibex: rates of poaching and livestock grazing are therefore high (Karimov, 2019). Overall, since 1988, when the first edition of the Red Book of Tajikistan was published, the number of endangered representatives of flora and fauna has increased significantly. In the first edition, 226 species of plants and 162 species of animals were included, in the second edition (2015) 267 species of plants and 222 species of animals in danger of extinction, and in the third edition there were already 304 species of plants and 242 species of animals in danger (CABAR, 2024). This national trend is likely also reflected in the property, however a lack of monitoring data makes a comprehensive assessment impossible.

Additional information

Outdoor recreation and tourism
The property is of great significance for outdoor recreation, especially mountaineering and trophy hunting. It has a long history of mountaineering, especially during the period when the Pamir peaks were the highest in the USSR.
Outdoor recreation and tourism
Vast wilderness landscapes like Tajik National Park are becoming rare with the increasing pace of international development (including that for mass tourism). The remoteness, spectacular mountain scenery, wildlife, discrete archaeological sites, and seasonal nomadic pastoral lifestyles can provide benefits to visitors and locals alike.

References

References
1
AKAH (2022). Improved Management of the Corridor Connecting Zorkul Natural Reserve and Tajik National Park, Tajikistan. CEPF Grant 112465. Aga Khan Agency for Habitat.
2
Bolingbroke-Kent, A. (2022). Why trophy hunters in Tajikistan are unlikely saviours of the snow leopard. The Guardian. Published online 19 April 2022. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/19/trophy-hunter…
3
CABAR (2024). Climate change: More plants and animals are becoming rare in Tajikistan. Central Asian Bureau for Analytical Reporting, CABAR. Published online 26 September 2024. Available at: https://cabar.asia/ru/izmenenie-klimata-redkih-rastenij-i-z…
4
Chernomorets et.al., 2015: Mud streams in the valley of the Barsemdara River in July, 2015 and the under pond lake Barsemkul on the river Gunt (The Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region, Tajikistan) // International scientific and practical conference "Second Vinogradovsky Readings. Art of a hydrology" memories of the outstanding Russian scientist Yu.B. Vinogradov (on November 18-22, 2015, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia). — St. Petersburg State University St. Petersburg, 2015. — Page 261-264.
5
Habibulloev, Sharifjon and HAN, Fang and Bakhtiyorov, Zulfiyor and MA, Xuankai and Nuhzor, Oshurmamadov and Nyirarwasa, Anathalia, Assessing the Impact of Teresken Degradation on Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, and Economic Value of Tajik National Park. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4795783 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4795783
6
IUCN Consultation (2020).
7
IUCN, 2013: IUCN Technical Evaluation: TAJIK NATIONAL PARK (Mountains of the Pamirs) (TAJIKISTAN) ID No. 1252 rev
8
Jalolova, S. (2024). Tajikistan and Uzbekistan Discuss Using Lake Sarez For Drinking Water. The Times of Central Asia. Published online 6 August 2024. Available at: Tajikistan and Uzbekistan Discuss Using Lake Sarez For Drinking Water - The Times Of Central Asia
9
Karimov, K. (2019). Community-based trophy hunting of Ibex and Markhor in Tajikistan. CITES & Livelihoods case study. Edited by IUCN CEESP/SSC Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group. Available at: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/prog/Livelihoods/…
10
Kholmatov, I. (2022). Tajikistan is Developing a Climate-Smart National Action Plan for the Conservation of the Snow Leopard and its Ecosystems. Central Asian Mammals Initiative. Published online 16 November 2022. Available at: https://www.cms.int/cami/en/news/tajikistan-developing-clim…
11
Khusrav, K., Hofiz, N., & Aziz, H. (2023). The Impact of Glacial Degradation on the State of the Agricultural Sector in the High-Mountain Territories of Tajikistan. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 1-8.
12
OSCE (2025). OSCE supports Tajikistan’s efforts to strengthen conservation in protected areas. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Published online 9 April 2025. Available at: OSCE supports Tajikistan’s efforts to strengthen conservation in protected areas | OSCE
13
Parker, B. G., Khanyari, M., Ambarlı, H., Buuveibaatar, B., Kabir, M., Khanal, G., ... & Farhadinia, M. S. (2023). A review of the ecological and socioeconomic characteristics of trophy hunting across Asia. Animal Conservation, 26(5), 609-624.
14
Saidov, A., Karimov, K., Kholmatov, I., & Novikova, T. (2024). The snow leopard in Tajikistan. In Snow Leopards (pp. 481-488). Academic Press.
15
Shafiev G. V., 2016 : Analysis of the conditions of the glof (glacial lake outburst) in Gund valley in south – east part of Pamir // Debris flows: risks, forecast, protection: Materials of IV International Conference (Russia, Irkutsk – Arshan village (The Republic of Byriatia), September 6–10, 2016). – Irkutsk: Publishing House of Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS, 2016: 250-254 pp.
16
Shokirov, Q., Backhaus, N., & Bartmess, J. (2021). Community perceptions of co-managing Tajik National Park. Central Asian Survey, 40(3), 420-437.
17
TNPa, 2012: Republic of Tajikistan, Tajik National Park (Mountains of the Pamirs), nomination document.
18
TNPb, 2012: Republic of Tajikistan, Management Plan of Tajik National park for 2012-2016
19
WII (n.d.). Tajik National Park (Mountains of the Pamirs). © 2024Wildlife Institute of India-Category 2 Centre on World Natural Heritage Management and Training for Asia and the Pacific Region. Available at: https://c2c.wii.gov.in/tajik-national-park-mountains-of-the…
20
Web: www.biodiv.tj GEF / UNDP Project "Conservation and sustainable use of Pamir Alay and Tien Shan ecosystems for snow leopard protection and sustainable community livelihoods"

Indigenous Heritage values

Would you like to share feedback to support the accuracy of information for this site? If so, send your comments below.

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.