Central Amazon Conservation Complex
Country
Brazil
Inscribed in
2000
Criteria
(ix)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
The Central Amazon Conservation Complex makes up the largest protected area in the Amazon Basin (over 6 million hectares) and is one of the planet’s richest regions in terms of biodiversity. It also includes an important sample of varzea ecosystems, igapó forests, lakes and channels which take the form of a constantly evolving aquatic mosaic that is home to the largest array of electric fish in the world. The site protects key threatened species, including giant arapaima fish, the Amazonian manatee, the black caiman and two species of river dolphin. © UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
11 Oct 2025
Good with some concerns
Current state and trend of VALUES
Low Concern
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
Ongoing ecological processes in the development of terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems
Criterion
(ix)
The vast site exceeding 5.3 million hectares with parts of Solimões/Amazonas and Negro rivers, some of their important tributaries and lands, includes landscapes and biodiversity comprised of a constantly changing and evolving mosaic formed by rivers courses, amazon tropical rainforests (e.g. Terra Firme Forests, Várzeas and Igapós), wetlands, lakes, rivers, and islands. It enables ongoing large-scale ecological processes in the development of these diverse forest and freshwater ecosystems, in particular white and black water systems (World Heritage Committee, 2015).
The property has a sufficient size to allow the maintenance of significant on-going ecological and biological processes, such as blow downs, changes in the river flood dynamics and natural burns, thus providing unique opportunities to study their effect on biodiversity in natural ecosystems (IUCN, 2003).
The property has a sufficient size to allow the maintenance of significant on-going ecological and biological processes, such as blow downs, changes in the river flood dynamics and natural burns, thus providing unique opportunities to study their effect on biodiversity in natural ecosystems (IUCN, 2003).
Ongoing biological processes in the colonization, succession and evolution of vegetation
Criterion
(ix)
In constant movement, the floating mats of vegetation typical of the várzea watercourses include a significant number of endemic species. Anavilhanas contains the second largest river archipelago in the world which illustrates the process of colonization and evolution of the vegetation on changing landforms (World Heritage Committee, 2015).
High diversity of habitats
Criterion
(x)
This vast property constitutes one of the largest complexes of protected areas in the tropics harbouring unparalleled biological diversity. This unparalleled biodiversity results from a unique combination of different factors. In terms of ecology, this property encompasses a huge variation of vegetation types due to underlying variation of soil types, biochemistry and fertility of waters. The diversity in primary producers (plants) translates into an equally diverse consumer community assemblage (animals) that specialises on the myriad available niches. In addition, this complex of protected areas spans several biogeographically distinct areas. Species overlap in composition is thus minimal contributing to the overall regional species diversity. The property protects a large and representative sample of the flora and fauna of the forests of the Amazon Central Plain, with a significant number of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems associated with the forest which are periodically inundated by seasonal flooding, as well as swamps (World Heritage Committee, 2015; IUCN Consultation, 2014).
Extermely high diversity of primates
Criterion
(x)
The property holds one of the highest recorded diversity of primates, where the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve (1,124,000 ha) and Amana Sustainable Development Reserve (2,350,000ha) represent one of the most diverse areas in the ‘New World’ with respect to primates, with 7 species in Mamirauá, 11 in Amana, and 15 between the two areas (IUCN, 2003). Species include the endangered and endemic Vanzolini’s squirrel monkey (Saimiri vanzolinii), with its entire range within the Mamirauá, the iconic white bald uakari monkey (Cacajao calvus) restricted to the flooded forests of Mamirauá, the golden-backed black uakari (Cacajao melanocephalus), and the black faced black spider monkey (Ateles chamek) (World Heritage Committee, 2015; IUCN Consultation, 2014, IUCN Red List, 2020).
Rare and endangered freshwater species
Criterion
(x)
The Anavilhanas Archipelago, one of the largest river archipelagos in the world, is constantly evolving and is home to the largest diversity of electric fish on the planet. This array is unique in the world, and a circulation range and an adaptation rate comparable to those of cichlids in the African Rift Valley, have been identified in the site. The site protects a wide variety of freshwater flora and fauna, including species such as the endangered giant otter (Pteronura brasiliensis), the vulnerable Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) and the black caiman (Melanosuchus niger). Other iconic species include the yellow caiman (Caiman crocodilus), the “pirarucu” (Arapaima gigas), the largest freshwater fish in South America, and two species of river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) (World Heritage Committee, 2015; IUCN Consultation, 2014; IUCN Red List, 2020). The Anavilhanas Archipelago and the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve also host the largest diversity of electric fish on the planet. The gymnotids (85 species) are remarkably diverse at the Mamirauá Reserve, where several new species have been described during the last two decades (Albert and Crampton, 2001; Crampton et al., 2004; Crampton et al., 2005).
Assessment information
The greatest threat to the key attributes of the property is the increasing occurrence of wildfires. Forest fires, caused or accidental, have been increasingly frequent, especially in Jaú National Park and around the site, during drought periods; in Anavilhanas it occurs occasionally. The construction of the Río Negro Bridge and road development have led to an increase in certain activities in the area, such as subsistence agriculture, hunting, fishing, and extraction of timber and non-timber forest products. On the other hand, tourism, with a rapid increase in visits in Jaú National Park and a high number of tourists without registration control in Anavilhanas National Park, represents a challenge for management. Despite existing protocols and tools, the monitoring of the legality of visits and compliance with regulations is still ineffective. The absence of an entry control system in Anavilhanas National Park limits data collection and hinders the implementation of visitor management strategies. Additionally, increasing concerns about unregulated tourism activities include waste disposal, habitat disturbance, and wildlife pressure, particularly in ecotourism ventures that promote wildlife interactions through food provision and the captivity of wild animals. The introduction of non-native species and the potential spread of zoonotic diseases further amplify the risks. The management of fishing quotas for protected species in Mamirauá and Amanã Sustainable Development Reserves indicates greater sustainable use of this resource, which should continue to be monitored. However, evidence suggests that some fishing practices are endangering other protected species, requiring stricter controls. While community-led pirarucu management has been successful, illegal fishing with explosives in Jaú National Park, particularly in the Cachoeiras do Carabinani region, remains a serious threat to fish populations and overall ecosystem stability. Strengthening institutional support, enhancing enforcement mechanisms, and expanding sustainable fisheries management programs will be crucial for long-term conservation and resource sustainability.
Recreational Activities
(Increase in visitation)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Construction of Rio Negro Bridge in Manaus has increased the accessibility to nearby towns and municipalities and tourism visitation.
Visitation at Anavilhanas National Park (NP) occurs without entry authorization or ticket collection by the managing body. Visitors arrange transport directly with river transport companies and service providers in Novo Airão, the park’s gateway, with 13 companies officially registered with ICMBio. These providers facilitate access to the park’s attractions, surrounding areas, and nearby communities. Between 2013 and 2018, visitation fluctuated between 5,000 and 11,000 visitors. In 2019, the number surged to 40,700, followed by a sharp decline to 16,400 in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, it rebounded to nearly 22,000 (Simonetti et al., 2022); and declined again to 14.556 in 2022 (ICMBIO, 2022a). While visitation is increasing, there is no clear evidence of more structured tourism management within the National Park. Although no recent data is available on visitor numbers for the other three protected areas of the Central Amazon Conservation Complex, several challenges have been identified in wildlife interaction ecotourism within the Mosaic of Protected Areas of the Lower Black River. These include the increasing number of enterprises that promote wildlife interactions through food provision, the capture and illegal captivity of wild animals, and the introduction of non-native species, which pose risks to native fauna. These risks include viral, fungal, and bacterial zoonoses, which remain understudied (Vidal et al., 2024).
In the past it was reported that the number of visitors is growing at Jaú NP, between 2013 and 2017 visitors' numbers increased by a 336%. Also, communities of Manaus recognized a lack of many joint actions that guarantee adequate tourism, identifying irregular and illegal river trips using private boats with the potential of non-compliance with the established rules for the environment (Detzel Consultores Asociados, 2018). Institutions also recognize disorderly presence of vessels as one of the main threats to the Anavilhanas NPA's biodiversity (MMA et al., 2017). The fastest growing touristic attraction in Anavilhanas is the interactive tourism with Amazonian pink dolphins (Inia geoffrensis). This potentially detrimental activity is now organized by the National Park authorities to minimize the impact on wild pink dolphin populations (Parque Nacional Anavilhanas, n.d). Despite the fact that no Federal or State laws regulating interactive tourism with river dolphins are in place, some management measures exist (Vidal et al., 2013). Proposed management measures for this type of tourism have showed a significant reduction of the risk of accidents and increased the benefits that dolphin-based tourism generates. Nonetheless, different intensity of impact on natural behavior of animals by the supply of food is still documented (Vidal, 2018; D´Cruze et al., 2017). Recreation activities demonstrate change of behaviour of one of two species of river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) protected within the site, and with the continuous increase of visitors and low management capacity, the severity of impacts affecting vegetation and ecological balance could also increase.
Since this threat is localized, the trend remains consistent with the 2020 Outlook assessment.
Visitation at Anavilhanas National Park (NP) occurs without entry authorization or ticket collection by the managing body. Visitors arrange transport directly with river transport companies and service providers in Novo Airão, the park’s gateway, with 13 companies officially registered with ICMBio. These providers facilitate access to the park’s attractions, surrounding areas, and nearby communities. Between 2013 and 2018, visitation fluctuated between 5,000 and 11,000 visitors. In 2019, the number surged to 40,700, followed by a sharp decline to 16,400 in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, it rebounded to nearly 22,000 (Simonetti et al., 2022); and declined again to 14.556 in 2022 (ICMBIO, 2022a). While visitation is increasing, there is no clear evidence of more structured tourism management within the National Park. Although no recent data is available on visitor numbers for the other three protected areas of the Central Amazon Conservation Complex, several challenges have been identified in wildlife interaction ecotourism within the Mosaic of Protected Areas of the Lower Black River. These include the increasing number of enterprises that promote wildlife interactions through food provision, the capture and illegal captivity of wild animals, and the introduction of non-native species, which pose risks to native fauna. These risks include viral, fungal, and bacterial zoonoses, which remain understudied (Vidal et al., 2024).
In the past it was reported that the number of visitors is growing at Jaú NP, between 2013 and 2017 visitors' numbers increased by a 336%. Also, communities of Manaus recognized a lack of many joint actions that guarantee adequate tourism, identifying irregular and illegal river trips using private boats with the potential of non-compliance with the established rules for the environment (Detzel Consultores Asociados, 2018). Institutions also recognize disorderly presence of vessels as one of the main threats to the Anavilhanas NPA's biodiversity (MMA et al., 2017). The fastest growing touristic attraction in Anavilhanas is the interactive tourism with Amazonian pink dolphins (Inia geoffrensis). This potentially detrimental activity is now organized by the National Park authorities to minimize the impact on wild pink dolphin populations (Parque Nacional Anavilhanas, n.d). Despite the fact that no Federal or State laws regulating interactive tourism with river dolphins are in place, some management measures exist (Vidal et al., 2013). Proposed management measures for this type of tourism have showed a significant reduction of the risk of accidents and increased the benefits that dolphin-based tourism generates. Nonetheless, different intensity of impact on natural behavior of animals by the supply of food is still documented (Vidal, 2018; D´Cruze et al., 2017). Recreation activities demonstrate change of behaviour of one of two species of river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) protected within the site, and with the continuous increase of visitors and low management capacity, the severity of impacts affecting vegetation and ecological balance could also increase.
Since this threat is localized, the trend remains consistent with the 2020 Outlook assessment.
Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees
(Riverside settlements and associated resource use )
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Small riverside settlements within the Central Amazon Conservation Complex continue posing a significant environmental threat due to resource exploitation and unsustainable practices. In Jaú National Park (NP), uncontrolled fires from slash-and-burn agriculture and illegal camps contribute to deforestation and forest degradation. Additionally, selective logging and unmanaged harvesting of cipó titica reduce natural stocks. Wildlife, particularly chelonians, faces overexploitation as a food source and for illegal trade. In the Carabinani River region, land clearing for camps, illegal fishing with explosives, and wildlife trafficking further threaten the ecosystem, particularly in permanent preservation areas like Lago do Santo Antônio (ICMBIO, 2023a).
Human activities pressuring Anavilhanas NP are increasing as a result of the Rio Negro Bridge in the State of Amazonas. Research around the area under direct influence of the bridge, which includes this National Park, reported after field observations an expansion of production of fruits and vegetables and fish ponds along new side roads (Pacheco et al., 2018). Comparing deforestation of the three years after the inauguration of the bridge in 2011 with data of previous seven years, rate of deforestation was almost the double in the immediate vicinity of 10 km of Anavilhanas National Park (MMA et al., 2017).
A report indicates low population numbers in these natural areas, estimating 971 inhabitants in Anavilhanas NP, 4722 in Jaú, 6131 in Mamirauá and 4722 in Amanã (Prüssmann et al., 2017). For Anavilhanas and Jaú NPs activities like turtle fishing, sand collection and logging are carried out for community consumption as traditional activities, however, sales to commercial companies are increasing (OECD, 2015). Harvesting of arumã leafstalks (for vegetable fiber handicrafts) is forbidden in areas surrounding the town of Novo Airão; some alternative areas for harvesting were suggested and monitored for three years and results showed no increase in growth rate neither recovery of leafstalk density (Nakasono et al., 2016).
Human activities pressuring Anavilhanas NP are increasing as a result of the Rio Negro Bridge in the State of Amazonas. Research around the area under direct influence of the bridge, which includes this National Park, reported after field observations an expansion of production of fruits and vegetables and fish ponds along new side roads (Pacheco et al., 2018). Comparing deforestation of the three years after the inauguration of the bridge in 2011 with data of previous seven years, rate of deforestation was almost the double in the immediate vicinity of 10 km of Anavilhanas National Park (MMA et al., 2017).
A report indicates low population numbers in these natural areas, estimating 971 inhabitants in Anavilhanas NP, 4722 in Jaú, 6131 in Mamirauá and 4722 in Amanã (Prüssmann et al., 2017). For Anavilhanas and Jaú NPs activities like turtle fishing, sand collection and logging are carried out for community consumption as traditional activities, however, sales to commercial companies are increasing (OECD, 2015). Harvesting of arumã leafstalks (for vegetable fiber handicrafts) is forbidden in areas surrounding the town of Novo Airão; some alternative areas for harvesting were suggested and monitored for three years and results showed no increase in growth rate neither recovery of leafstalk density (Nakasono et al., 2016).
Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Fishing)
Other targeted species names
Pirarucu (Arapaima gigas)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
The Cachoeiras do Carabinani in Jaú National Park is impacted by illegal fishing using explosives in the lakes, carried out by invaders involved in the trafficking of wildlife, especially chelonians and pirarucu (ICMBIO, 2023).
In contrast, efforts to enhance sustainable pirarucu fishing are yielding positive results. After a 22-year time series of standardized surveys for dolphins, botos (Inia geoffrensis) and tucuxis (Sotalia fluviatilis), within the Mamirauá Reserve, results showed that these species are declining most likely due to the direct and incidental mortality caused by fishing activities, as a result of use of gillnets (da Silva et al., 2018). The Mamirauá Institute currently advises 13 fishing agreements in the Amazon, marking 25 years of successful pirarucu management that removed the species from extinction risk. The Marumaruá-Atapi management group in the Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve (RDSA) has received IBAMA authorization to sustainably fish 120 pirarucus (6,000 kg) in 2024. This achievement, stemming from a community-led process since 2008, highlights efforts to regulate fisheries and conserve resources. Based on SEMA/AM Normative Instruction No. 09 (2017), this initiative reinforces sustainable practices, restores pirarucu populations, and provides economic benefits to local communities (Instituto Mamirauá, 2024).
The piracatinga fishing using black caiman and dolphins as bait is practiced in the mid-Solimões region including Mamirauá and Amanã Sustainable Development Reserves (Pimienta et al., 2018; Botero et al., 2014). However, caiman population is the most abundant game species in the várzea at MSDR (Pimienta et al., 2018).
In 2019, fishing quota of pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) increased in these areas. Measures are being taken as a result of the growing strengthening of sustainable pirarucu fishing in the Amazon. In 2020 fish species management included 48 riverside communities, 3 fishing colonies, 1 fishermen's association and 1 fishermen's union (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, 2020a).
In contrast, efforts to enhance sustainable pirarucu fishing are yielding positive results. After a 22-year time series of standardized surveys for dolphins, botos (Inia geoffrensis) and tucuxis (Sotalia fluviatilis), within the Mamirauá Reserve, results showed that these species are declining most likely due to the direct and incidental mortality caused by fishing activities, as a result of use of gillnets (da Silva et al., 2018). The Mamirauá Institute currently advises 13 fishing agreements in the Amazon, marking 25 years of successful pirarucu management that removed the species from extinction risk. The Marumaruá-Atapi management group in the Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve (RDSA) has received IBAMA authorization to sustainably fish 120 pirarucus (6,000 kg) in 2024. This achievement, stemming from a community-led process since 2008, highlights efforts to regulate fisheries and conserve resources. Based on SEMA/AM Normative Instruction No. 09 (2017), this initiative reinforces sustainable practices, restores pirarucu populations, and provides economic benefits to local communities (Instituto Mamirauá, 2024).
The piracatinga fishing using black caiman and dolphins as bait is practiced in the mid-Solimões region including Mamirauá and Amanã Sustainable Development Reserves (Pimienta et al., 2018; Botero et al., 2014). However, caiman population is the most abundant game species in the várzea at MSDR (Pimienta et al., 2018).
In 2019, fishing quota of pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) increased in these areas. Measures are being taken as a result of the growing strengthening of sustainable pirarucu fishing in the Amazon. In 2020 fish species management included 48 riverside communities, 3 fishing colonies, 1 fishermen's association and 1 fishermen's union (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, 2020a).
Garbage & Solid Waste
(Plastic pollution)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Recent studies have revealed the presence of microplastics in the digestive tract of 13 freshwater fish species in the lower Xingu River and 14 marine species in the Amazon estuarine region, many of these species are commonly consumed by the local population (Andrade et al., 2019; Pegado et al., 2018). The same problem is occurring in small Amazonian bodies of water, where in a recent study 98% of the twelve individuals analyzed had contamination by microplastic (Ribeiro-Brasil et al., 2020). New evidence of discarded plastics in the vast Amazon basin clearly demonstrates the magnitude and complexity of this global environmental challenge (Giarrizzo et al., 2019). A study by the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Institute, found plastic particles in the stomach and intestine of fish widely consumed in the Amazon (Jaraqui, Aruanã, Tucunaré, Tambaqui, Sardinha and Pacu). It stated that out of 336 fish analyzed in the Middle Solimões region, 25 had plastic contamination. While the number is relatively small, it raises concerns about both physical and toxicological harm, potentially affecting the reproductive chain (EBC, 2023; Portal Amazônia On, 2023).
The disposal of trash in the rivers of the Amazon Basin is the result of poor public policies and a general lack of environmental awareness, coupled with a lack of investment in waste treatment infrastructure and a reduction in the use of single-use plastic items (Backer, 2005; Giarrizzo et al., 2019; Silva, 2009). Plastic constitutes 15.7% of the total solid waste produced in the Amazon, a percentage that represents more than twice the national average (MMA, 2015). In general, when plastics are widely available in the environment, they can negatively impact organisms, for example, causing choking, entanglement, stress and internal damage when ingested (Andrady, 2011; Cole et al., 2011; Anderson et al., 2016), which easily occurs with smaller plastic residues (meso and microplastics). In addition, plastics also contain additives in their composition, such as plasticizers, flame retardants, thermal stabilizers, antimicrobial agents and dyes that are known as persistent organic pollutants (POP's) (Andrady & Neal, 2009; Cole et al., 2011; Rochman et al., 2014). Heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants present in the environment can adsorb on the surface of plastics (Ashton et al., 2010; Avio et al., 2017; Camacho et al., 2018).
The disposal of trash in the rivers of the Amazon Basin is the result of poor public policies and a general lack of environmental awareness, coupled with a lack of investment in waste treatment infrastructure and a reduction in the use of single-use plastic items (Backer, 2005; Giarrizzo et al., 2019; Silva, 2009). Plastic constitutes 15.7% of the total solid waste produced in the Amazon, a percentage that represents more than twice the national average (MMA, 2015). In general, when plastics are widely available in the environment, they can negatively impact organisms, for example, causing choking, entanglement, stress and internal damage when ingested (Andrady, 2011; Cole et al., 2011; Anderson et al., 2016), which easily occurs with smaller plastic residues (meso and microplastics). In addition, plastics also contain additives in their composition, such as plasticizers, flame retardants, thermal stabilizers, antimicrobial agents and dyes that are known as persistent organic pollutants (POP's) (Andrady & Neal, 2009; Cole et al., 2011; Rochman et al., 2014). Heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants present in the environment can adsorb on the surface of plastics (Ashton et al., 2010; Avio et al., 2017; Camacho et al., 2018).
Fire & Fire Management
(Increasing occurrence of fires)
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Fire is an increasing threat for natural areas. Previous reports related different events: in 2015 the Amazonas State broke its own record of forest fires with 15,170 sources of heat, and in 2016 one thousand hectares of the Jaú NP were affected by fire (INPE, 2020). The Amazon State has showed an increasing number of active fire focus detected by satellite monitoring in the recent years, indicating more than 11,000 focus every year since 2015 (INPE, 2020). The 2019 was the year with most fires in Amazon Basin for over a decade, indicating to the Amazon State as the 10th state with most number of fires. The negative synergies between deforestation, climate change, and widespread use of fire is increasing and representing a major threat for the Amazon System, flip to a non-forest ecosystems in eastern, southern and central Amazonia at 20–25% deforestation rate (Stewart, 2019). Climate change also affects ecology balance, as hydrology is the major extrinsic driver of assemblage structure of fishes inhabiting floodplain habitats; significant changes in Amazon floodplain fish assemblages were recognized after the strong drought of 2005 (Ropke et al., 2017).
More recently, the Amazon rainforest, historically fire-resistant, is experiencing an alarming increase in wildfires due to climate extremes and human activity. The 2023/2024 drought, surpassing previous records, combined with forest fragmentation, has dramatically heightened fire vulnerability. Analysing the Tropical Moist Forest (TMF) and Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS) datasets, researchers have found a 152 % surge in forest disturbances in 2024, reaching a two-decade peak of 6.64 million hectares (Bourgoin et al., 2025). Forest fires, caused or accidental, have been increasingly frequent, especially in Jaú Park and around the site, during drought periods; in Anavilhanas it occurs occasionally. Usually associated with barbecues, whose fire was not put out. In some areas, purposeful burning also occurs to increase the reproduction area of the tracajás (Podocnemis unifiis). The use of fire is frequent in the opening of plantations in the communities living in PARNA Jaú (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
More recently, the Amazon rainforest, historically fire-resistant, is experiencing an alarming increase in wildfires due to climate extremes and human activity. The 2023/2024 drought, surpassing previous records, combined with forest fragmentation, has dramatically heightened fire vulnerability. Analysing the Tropical Moist Forest (TMF) and Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS) datasets, researchers have found a 152 % surge in forest disturbances in 2024, reaching a two-decade peak of 6.64 million hectares (Bourgoin et al., 2025). Forest fires, caused or accidental, have been increasingly frequent, especially in Jaú Park and around the site, during drought periods; in Anavilhanas it occurs occasionally. Usually associated with barbecues, whose fire was not put out. In some areas, purposeful burning also occurs to increase the reproduction area of the tracajás (Podocnemis unifiis). The use of fire is frequent in the opening of plantations in the communities living in PARNA Jaú (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
The potential threats to the Central Amazon Conservation Complex remain largely consistent with the 2020 outlook. The increase in visitation, plastic pollution, and cargo ship activity in the Anavilhanas archipelago continue to pose risks, particularly in the absence of control measures. The rising accessibility to Anavilhanas National Park due to road development, along with unregulated tourism activities, could exert pressure on the ecosystem if not properly planned. Likewise, cargo ship transit remains a concern, with risks of pollution and potential oil spills affecting aquatic biodiversity. Plastic pollution, though relatively low in detected levels, continues to be a source of environmental and toxicological concern. In contrast, the threat posed by dam construction in the Amazon Basin has decreased, as no new infrastructure projects have been identified in or around the conservation complex. However, past and existing dams still influence sedimentation, hydrological dynamics, and wildlife migration patterns, underscoring the need for continued monitoring and mitigation efforts.
Recreational Activities
(Potential increase in visitation )
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Accessibility to Anavilhanas National Park by road development as a result of the Rio Negro Bridge construction, and increased tourism in different natural areas, could result, without an effective management, in negative impacts. Activities and services to support visitation have been proposed for the Anavilhanas National Park and the Jaú National Park based on the socio-environmental, institutional and public use factors (Detzel Consultores Asociados, 2018), which can help develop better capacity for potential visitation. Expansion of recreational activities without careful planning, including of infrastructure capacity, could increase the pressures on the ecological balance of the site and its freshwater diversity.
Shipping Lanes
(Cargo ships in the waters of the Anavilhanas archipelago )
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Location of Anavilhanas NP along a navigable portion of the lower Negro river exposes the area to the regular transit of large ships and to potential risks of oil spill (IUCN, 2003). The 2019 oil spill in the Brazilian coastline, considered the worst oil spill in Brazil’s history and one of the largest on record in the world, demonstrated institutional unpreparedness for the prevention of such events and inadequate legal frameworks (Lopes et al., 2020). Location of cities like Manaus and Novo Airão close to Anavilhanas NP, represents a constant flow of visitors throughout the year. Boats are one of the main tourism transportation, and rigorous control is also required for larger vessels in order to reduce pollution (Azevedo, 2019). A cargo ship accident involving chemical products would result in a very high risk of pollution and impacts on hydrological and biological values of the conservation units.
Renewable Energy
(Dam construction in the Amazon Basin)
Outside site
Potential effects on the ecosystem balance as a result of dam construction in the Andean Amazon area have been recognized. According to the study developed in the Lakes Mamirauá, Piranha and Castanho, manatee’s migration is affected by the narrowing of channels that connect the floodplain area, the frequency and length of these bottlenecks can further exacerbated by climate- or dam-induced extreme droughts (Arraut et al., 2017). A study on Central Amazon, including the Jaú River (Jaú area), recognized a potential change in the landscape downstream of the igapos forest as a result of the alteration of the community of seedlings in the Uatumã area caused for the building of the Balbina dam (Rocha et al., 2020). Alterations in the sedimentation process in the Anavilhanas Archipelago have been shown to be a consequence of construction of dams on the Branco River (Ribeiro et al., 2020).
As of 2024, there is no evidence of construction or planning of new dams in or around the Central Amazon Conservation Complex.
As of 2024, there is no evidence of construction or planning of new dams in or around the Central Amazon Conservation Complex.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Although there is no exclusive decision-making body for the Central Amazon Conservation Complex (CACC), two regional forums include its protected areas either fully or partially. One of these is the State Council of the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve (CERBAC) and its regional committees, which function as an autonomous and proactive body, ensuring decision-making aligns with the socio-territorial realities of the Reserve. Additionally, the 2020-2024 Action Plan for the Biosphere Reserve includes several initiatives aimed at enhancing the participation of Indigenous peoples in various communication, visibility, implementation, and decision-making spaces (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá and SEMA Amazonas, 2020).
The other is the advisory council of the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic, which serves as a platform for social participation, bringing together representatives from civil society and various governmental levels. This council acts as a democratic, political, and representative forum for dialogue and coordination (MBRN, n.d.). In March 2023, young representatives were elected to the Council, and a charter of principles for the RBAC youth network was drafted to guide efforts in securing support and partnerships (FVA, 2023a). The 30th Meeting of the Advisory Council took place in March 2024, bringing together council members, community associations, social and environmental organizations, the tourism sector, researchers, government institutions, NGOs, and residents of conservation units within the territory (Prefeitura de Novo Airão, 2024).
Individually, each of the protected areas that make up the CACC has its own advisory councils, according to the 2023 management effectiveness assessment (ICMBIO, 2023b,c,d,e). These are forum for discussion, negotiation, and management of the Conservation Unit and its area of influence, addressing environmental, social, economic, cultural, and political issues. It is formally established and linked to the management structure of the Conservation Unit.
The other is the advisory council of the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic, which serves as a platform for social participation, bringing together representatives from civil society and various governmental levels. This council acts as a democratic, political, and representative forum for dialogue and coordination (MBRN, n.d.). In March 2023, young representatives were elected to the Council, and a charter of principles for the RBAC youth network was drafted to guide efforts in securing support and partnerships (FVA, 2023a). The 30th Meeting of the Advisory Council took place in March 2024, bringing together council members, community associations, social and environmental organizations, the tourism sector, researchers, government institutions, NGOs, and residents of conservation units within the territory (Prefeitura de Novo Airão, 2024).
Individually, each of the protected areas that make up the CACC has its own advisory councils, according to the 2023 management effectiveness assessment (ICMBIO, 2023b,c,d,e). These are forum for discussion, negotiation, and management of the Conservation Unit and its area of influence, addressing environmental, social, economic, cultural, and political issues. It is formally established and linked to the management structure of the Conservation Unit.
Legal framework
Jaú National Park was established by Federal Decree in 1980 (Fundação Vitória Amazônica, 1998). The Anavilhanas conservation unit was declared an Ecological Station by Federal Decree in 2001, and later re-categorized as a National Park in 2008 (MMA, et al., 2017). The Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve was created in 1998 by Decree 19.021 and the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve in 1990 by Decree 12.836, both areas are managed by the State governmental level (Instituto Socioambiental, n.d). Anavilhanas NP recognizes the absence of a legal management tool in relation to subsistence fishing (MMA et al., 2017). Also, in Jaú NP and Anavilhanas NP, prospective tourism development recognized, according to the legal framework, the suitability with the Management Plans and the Public Use Plans of the current and proposed activities, and the conditions that should apply for some of the cases (Detzel Consultores Asociados, 2018).
Governance arrangements
At the individual level, each protected area within the Cental Amazon Conservation Complex operates under its own advisory council. These councils serve as formal platforms for discussion, negotiation, and management, addressing environmental, social, economic, cultural, and political issues. They are institutionally linked to the management structure of each conservation unit, ensuring participatory governance and localized decision-making (ICMBIO, n.d.).
At the complex level, the State Council of the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve (CERBAC) and the Advisory Council of the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic serve as regional platforms for decision-making and stakeholder engagement. These councils bring together representatives from community associations, environmental organizations, the tourism sector, researchers, government institutions, NGOs, and residents of conservation units, fostering collaborative governance and informed decision-making across the region.
At the complex level, the State Council of the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve (CERBAC) and the Advisory Council of the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic serve as regional platforms for decision-making and stakeholder engagement. These councils bring together representatives from community associations, environmental organizations, the tourism sector, researchers, government institutions, NGOs, and residents of conservation units, fostering collaborative governance and informed decision-making across the region.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
The national parks and sustainable development reserves, which comprise this World Heritage site, are well integrated into the national (SNUC) and state systems (SEUC) of protected areas and through them to the wider planning systems. The Lower Rio Negro Mosaic including Jaú NP, Anavilhanas NP and Amanã SDR also facilitates the integration of areas into the broader landscape scale to manage limits, which is undertaken through a committee and a joint plan, allowing park managers to share expertise, infrastructure and equipment and better engage with communities residing in border areas (OECD, 2015). Also, the Amazon Region Protected Areas program (ARPA) launched in 2002 and one of the main funding programs for the conservation areas in Brazil, included specific actions for the Jaú NP (Silva et al., 2017) and supported the delivery of the Management Plan for the Amanã Reserve (Amazonas Governo do Estado et al., 2019). The Global Environment Facility (GEF), approved the Amazon Sustainable Landscapes Program (ASL) to bring together three countries—Brazil, Colombia, and Peru— aimed at strengthening biodiversity conservation, reducing deforestation, improving living conditions of local communities, and maintaining the integrity of local, regional, and global ecosystem services in the Amazon Biome; which involves protected and productive landscapes in nine Brazilian Amazonian States, including the conservation units of the Central Amazon Conservation Complex (GEF, 2019).
The Central Amazon Conservation Complex components are also included in the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve
and its 2020-2024 Action Plan. It includes 118 actions duly linked to the Sub-areas of the Strategic Action Areas - AAE of the Lima Action Plan (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá and SEMA Amazonas, 2020).
The Central Amazon Conservation Complex components are also included in the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve
and its 2020-2024 Action Plan. It includes 118 actions duly linked to the Sub-areas of the Strategic Action Areas - AAE of the Lima Action Plan (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá and SEMA Amazonas, 2020).
Boundaries
The configuration of the Amazon Complex Nature Reserve allows the connectivity of Jaú NP, Amanã SDR and Mamirauá SDR, while Anavilhanas NP is separated by a forested corridor consisting of state extractive reserves and an indigenous reserve (IUCN, 2003). The management plans recognize limits and inclusion of natural areas within other designations. The last Management Plan of Anavilhanas NP recognized the absence of planning in all marginal areas and in 2015 an adjustment of the boundaries was undertaken using satellite imagery. The current surface of the Park is 350,469.79 ha (MMA et al., 2017). The Management Plan of Amanã recommended expanding the conservation unit boundaries to include the entire current buffer zone until integrating the current extreme southern limit of the conservation unit in order to guarantee the appropriate use of the area's resources (Amazonas Governo do Estado et al., 2019).
The Territorial Consolidation Working Group, formed within the advisory and deliberative councils of Jaú National Park and the Rio Unini Extractive Reserve (Resex), has put forward a proposal to modify the boundaries of these protected areas. The plan seeks to remove the territories of communities residing within the Park along the Unini River, as well as the Vila Nova community, from the Resex’s limits. In return, the Park’s borders would be extended to encompass the streams on the right bank of the Carabinani River and the headwaters of the Pauini River. However, any partial reclassification of the Park to benefit the Resex would require a formal legislative process, including the passage of a dedicated bill (ICMBIO, 2023a).
The Territorial Consolidation Working Group, formed within the advisory and deliberative councils of Jaú National Park and the Rio Unini Extractive Reserve (Resex), has put forward a proposal to modify the boundaries of these protected areas. The plan seeks to remove the territories of communities residing within the Park along the Unini River, as well as the Vila Nova community, from the Resex’s limits. In return, the Park’s borders would be extended to encompass the streams on the right bank of the Carabinani River and the headwaters of the Pauini River. However, any partial reclassification of the Park to benefit the Resex would require a formal legislative process, including the passage of a dedicated bill (ICMBIO, 2023a).
Overlapping international designations
The World Heritage site encompasses 31.94% of the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá and SEMA Amazonas, 2020) and the components are also included in the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve 2020-2024 Action Plan. It includes 118 actions duly linked to the Sub-areas of the Strategic Action Areas - AAE of the Lima Action Plan (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá and SEMA Amazonas, 2020). Additionally, Anavilhanas National Park and Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve have been designated as Ramsar Sites since 2017 and 1993, respectively. Jaú National Park and Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve are also part of the Rio Negro Ramsar Site, which spans over 12 million hectares. As part of the largest tributary on the northern side of the Amazon Basin, this Ramsar Site includes more than 20 conservation units and Indigenous lands (Ramsar, n.d.), underscoring the biological, socio-environmental, and strategic significance of these protected areas within the Complex.
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
The 2003 World Heritage Committee decision approving the extension of the World Heritage site encouraged the State Party to "re-nominate the subsidiary area of Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve once it fully meets the conditions of integrity." No follow-up is known as of today.
Climate action
The Lower Rio Negro Mosaic region faces multiple challenges at different scales due to the effects of climate change and human activities. These changes directly influence the intensity of extreme events, reducing the quality of life for local communities and threatening vital natural habitats. Recent occurrences in the region include major floods and droughts, wildfires, rising temperatures, and water pollution (FVA, 2023e).
However, the management plans of the four protected areas do not include specific measures to protect their outstanding values from the negative impacts of climate change.
However, the management plans of the four protected areas do not include specific measures to protect their outstanding values from the negative impacts of climate change.
Management plan and overall management system
The 2023 management effectiveness evaluation indicates that Anavilhanas National Park is considered effectively managed, with an overall score of 60.9%. The highest-rated categories were “Products and Services” (76.1%) and “Results” (75.6%), reflecting a strong level of conservation for the park’s resources and values. However, the lowest-rated category was “Context” (40.6%), highlighting challenges in preventing and mitigating prohibited activities within the park (ICMBIO, 2023b).
Jaú National Park is also classified as effectively managed, achieving an overall score of 62.8%. The strongest performance was in the categories of “Results” (83.1%) and “Products and Services” (78.5%), indicating a high level of conservation for the park’s resources and values. However, the “Context” category received the lowest score (40.6%), underscoring difficulties in controlling and mitigating unauthorized activities within the park (ICMBIO, 2023c).
Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve is considered moderate effectively managed, with an overall score of 60.9%. The highest-rated categories were “Products and Services” (100%) and “Results” (68.8%), suggesting that the permitted uses occurring within the site does not impact negatively its values and the resources and values are in good level of conservation. In contrast, the lowest-rated category was “Inputs” (17.2%), highlighting challenges in availability of necessary resources for management actions. It considers the availability of personnel, technical capacity, equipment, and financial resources (ICMBIO, 2023d).
Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve is also classified as moderately effectively managed, with an overall score of 53.9%. The highest-rated categories, “Products and Services” (90%) and “Results” (74.7%), indicate that the permitted activities within the site do not negatively impact its values, and its resources remain well conserved. On the other hand, the lowest-rated category, “Inputs” (17.2%), underscores significant challenges in securing the necessary resources for effective management actions (ICMBIO, 2023e).
This suggests that while the overall management system is functional, conservation outcomes and service provision is demonstrated, resource constraints and enforcement limitations hinder its full effectiveness, especially in both Sustainable Development Reserves.
Jaú National Park is also classified as effectively managed, achieving an overall score of 62.8%. The strongest performance was in the categories of “Results” (83.1%) and “Products and Services” (78.5%), indicating a high level of conservation for the park’s resources and values. However, the “Context” category received the lowest score (40.6%), underscoring difficulties in controlling and mitigating unauthorized activities within the park (ICMBIO, 2023c).
Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve is considered moderate effectively managed, with an overall score of 60.9%. The highest-rated categories were “Products and Services” (100%) and “Results” (68.8%), suggesting that the permitted uses occurring within the site does not impact negatively its values and the resources and values are in good level of conservation. In contrast, the lowest-rated category was “Inputs” (17.2%), highlighting challenges in availability of necessary resources for management actions. It considers the availability of personnel, technical capacity, equipment, and financial resources (ICMBIO, 2023d).
Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve is also classified as moderately effectively managed, with an overall score of 53.9%. The highest-rated categories, “Products and Services” (90%) and “Results” (74.7%), indicate that the permitted activities within the site do not negatively impact its values, and its resources remain well conserved. On the other hand, the lowest-rated category, “Inputs” (17.2%), underscores significant challenges in securing the necessary resources for effective management actions (ICMBIO, 2023e).
This suggests that while the overall management system is functional, conservation outcomes and service provision is demonstrated, resource constraints and enforcement limitations hinder its full effectiveness, especially in both Sustainable Development Reserves.
Law enforcement
According to the management effectiveness evaluations of last years for Jaú NP and Anavilhanas NP (ICMBio, 2020), control of illegal use of resources requires more inspection. Use of amazon river dolphins for fishing piracatinga was a practice threatening this species; as a result the Brazilian Government placed a 5-year moratorium on fishing for piracatinga in 2014, but the practice still continues illegally (Asher, 2018). In some portions of the Mamirauá Reserve, the piracatinga fishing activity has declined in the past two years, probably related to law enforcement, awareness and environmental education activities (Botero et al., 2014).
Regarding surveillance, which was one of the management actions assessed in the 2023 management effectiveness evaluation, Anavilhanas and Jaú National Parks were found to implement this action only partially. This suggests insufficient human resources and limited financial resources for monitoring activities, public use, and socio-environmental management (ICMBIO, 2023a).
Regarding surveillance, which was one of the management actions assessed in the 2023 management effectiveness evaluation, Anavilhanas and Jaú National Parks were found to implement this action only partially. This suggests insufficient human resources and limited financial resources for monitoring activities, public use, and socio-environmental management (ICMBIO, 2023a).
Sustainable finance
As of 2023, the management effectiveness assessment indicates that all components of the Central Amazon Conservation Complex are part of the ARPA Program, ensuring significant support for their management (ICMBIO, 2023b,c,d,e). In 2023 ICMBIO received its highest budget since its establishment in 2007, amounting to R$ 407 million—22.3% more than the previous year. According to the Directorate of Planning, Administration, and Logistics (Diplan), a substantial share of these resources will be allocated to prevention initiatives, such as prescribed burns (ICMBIO, 2023f). On the other hand, securing funding for Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve management has been a persistent challenge for public environmental authorities in the State of Amazonas due to several factors: (a) the absence of a dedicated budget line to allocate state treasury funds for essential goods and services; (b) the lack of a permanent multidisciplinary team exclusively focused on the Reserve management; (c) insufficient project management strategies to attract national and international funding; (d) budget constraints and the short-term nature of external financing from institutional partnerships; and (e) governance issues within environmental management policies, particularly regarding leadership changes and continuity (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá and SEMA Amazonas, 2020).
Staff capacity, training and development
According to the 2023 management effectiveness assessment, Anavilhanas National Park has 18 management actions, of which 16 are classified as having “very low” and “low” staffing levels, while only two are rated as “moderate”. Regarding technical capacity, 12 actions are rated as "very low" or "low," while only 6 are classified as "moderate” (ICMBIO, 2023b).
Even more concerning is the situation at Jaú National Park, which has 30 management actions, all of which are classified as having “very low,” “low,” or even “inexistent” staffing levels. In terms of technical capacity, only 7 actions are rated as “moderate,” while the remaining 23 fall into the categories of “very low”, “low” or “inexistent” (ICMBIO, 2023c).
The situation in the Sustainable Development Reserves is equally concerning. In Amanã, no staff was available to implement the four designated management actions, and technical capacity was rated as “very low,” “low,” or “inexistent” (ICMBIO, 2023d). Similarly, in Mamirauá Reserve, there was no staff to carry out the three assigned management actions, and technical capacity was also classified as “very low” (ICMBIO, 2023d).
This suggests a severe shortage of human resources, which could impact the protected area’s ability to effectively implement conservation, monitoring, and enforcement measures.
Even more concerning is the situation at Jaú National Park, which has 30 management actions, all of which are classified as having “very low,” “low,” or even “inexistent” staffing levels. In terms of technical capacity, only 7 actions are rated as “moderate,” while the remaining 23 fall into the categories of “very low”, “low” or “inexistent” (ICMBIO, 2023c).
The situation in the Sustainable Development Reserves is equally concerning. In Amanã, no staff was available to implement the four designated management actions, and technical capacity was rated as “very low,” “low,” or “inexistent” (ICMBIO, 2023d). Similarly, in Mamirauá Reserve, there was no staff to carry out the three assigned management actions, and technical capacity was also classified as “very low” (ICMBIO, 2023d).
This suggests a severe shortage of human resources, which could impact the protected area’s ability to effectively implement conservation, monitoring, and enforcement measures.
Education and interpretation programmes
Educational programs are developed in different conservation units, comprising this World Heritage site, with multiactoral support, and focused on strengthening of community skills for the management and conservation of natural areas. The ARPA developed the Young Protagonists of Unini Project, which trained 567 young people at Jaú NP and achieved the increasing of the participation of young people in the council meetings from 3 people in 2012 to 24 in 2015 (Silva et al., 2017). Also, training actions at Novo Airão for transportation drivers in environmental interpretation have been carried out in order to bring the local community and UC management together (Detzel Consultores Asociados, 2018). Moreover, in the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic, turtle protection program included strategies for environmental education, which by 2016, have been implemented in nine communities; further requests for these courses and increasing understanding of the ecological importance of turtle species in local communities were positive outcomes (WCS, 2017). Other programmes with international partnerships have resulted in the elaboration of materials for environmental interpretation in the Anavilhanas National Park and educational training for the pirarucu sustainable management with the Mamirauá SDR (USAID, 2017). The Centro Vocacional Tecnológico (CVT) of the Mamirauá Institute focuses on the training and technical improvement of young rural producers who work in the management of natural resources in the Amazon. CVT trains leaders capable of facing difficulties imposed on communities far from large centers. To date, 80 students have been trained (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Tourism and visitation management
Jaú NP and Anavilhanas NP do not have available food and beverage facilities, with restricted options in the region near the headquarters of Novo Airão, and mainly taken in the boats. Accommodation is usually offered on boats or in wild campsites, which can be set up by the drivers of the groups with local wood and tarpaulins for setting up the nets. Both parks have offered courses for drivers in Novo Airão aiming to qualify them in environmental interpretation and driving visitors in general (Detzel Consultores Asociados, 2018). Evaluation of tourist attractions at Anavilhanas NP showed that walking trails, aquatic trails and the River Dolphins tourism are priority attractions, however the area has practically no tourism infrastructure (Silva, 2019). In the Mamirauá and Amanã Reserve, the Uakari Lodge has been built using sustainable approaches, such as use of solar energy and rainwater. Presently this lodge is managed by the local community and the Mamirauá Institute (Uakari Lodge, 2020). The proposal of the Amanã Management Plan includes a sub-program for tourism and recreation (Amazonas Governo do Estado, 2019). Jaú NP and Anavilhanas NP face a challenge to manage impacts due to low present capacity and increasing of visitation, recognizing impacts like pollution from vessels, impacts on trails and animal contact activities (Azevedo, 2019; Vidal, 2018; D´Cruze et al., 2017). The community based ecotourism in Mamirauá and Amanã Reserves have been proposed since the beginning with a conservation approach and as a low intensity activity, defining measures to control number of visitors, establishing some restrictions for boats, offering information to visitors about the rules, offering the service of visitation with local and trained guides, and recognizing tourism as complementary to subsistence and productive practices to avoid displacement of these activities (Peralta et al., 2019). A national guide to manage tourism in a sustainable way in national parks was released recently (Leung at al., 2019).
The LIRA Project, implemented by IPÊ, Fundo Amazônia, and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, conducted two workshops between 2021 and 2022, bringing together tourism operators, state and municipal government representatives, and sustainability stakeholders. These workshops aimed to map resources, attractions, and tourism services in conservation units (UCs) within the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic. Additionally, two field expeditions were carried out in 2021, during both the flood and dry seasons, to assess tourism infrastructure and initiatives in sustainable development reserves, national parks, and indigenous communities within the region (FVA, 2022c). However, despite these efforts, the 2023 management effectiveness evaluation underscores significant limitations in staffing, technical capacity, and financial resources in Anavilhanas and Jaú National Parks, highlighting the ongoing need for external support (ICMBIO, 2023b,c).
The LIRA Project, implemented by IPÊ, Fundo Amazônia, and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, conducted two workshops between 2021 and 2022, bringing together tourism operators, state and municipal government representatives, and sustainability stakeholders. These workshops aimed to map resources, attractions, and tourism services in conservation units (UCs) within the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic. Additionally, two field expeditions were carried out in 2021, during both the flood and dry seasons, to assess tourism infrastructure and initiatives in sustainable development reserves, national parks, and indigenous communities within the region (FVA, 2022c). However, despite these efforts, the 2023 management effectiveness evaluation underscores significant limitations in staffing, technical capacity, and financial resources in Anavilhanas and Jaú National Parks, highlighting the ongoing need for external support (ICMBIO, 2023b,c).
Sustainable use
The twin objectives of conservation and sustainable resource use are the focus of management for the Sustainable Development Reserves. Sustainable production in the conservation units include the use of fishery resources, timber, non-timber forest resources, agroforestry systems, and ecotourism. Projects and control over the use of resources are integrating local communities and bringing benefits for both natural conservation and local benefits. The construction of the Agroextractive Plant of the Union of Residents of Rio Unini for the production of dehydrated chestnuts is the pilot project in the Negro River basin, which brings inland opportunities for non-timber forest products to riverside dwellers (ICMBio, 2017). Quotas for pirarucu fishing and programs are demonstrating positive results for both, recovery of the specie and incomes for local fishermen. Since 1999, pirarucu population increased from 2,500 to more than 190,500 in 2018 thanks to the introduction of fishing quotas. Also, recovery of the alligator population as a result of the prohibition of hunting and the creation of the reserves, are outcomes of community and institutional collaborative monitoring and conservation efforts (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, 2020a; Science X Network, 2019). However, fishing practices still require major control, as some studies demonstrates the accidental mortality of tucuxis and botos in nets (da Silva et al., 2018).
In the Middle Solimões region, the Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development (IDSM) has been a pioneer in participatory pirarucu management since 1999, under the supervision of Brazil’s Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation (MCTI). The institute supports fishing communities in the Mamirauá and Amanã reserves and surrounding municipalities, promoting responsible fishing and species conservation. Its current strategy focuses on training local leaders to apply sustainable fishing practices in their communities. In April 2023 students from northern institutions participated in an 11-day course on shared fishery management, emphasizing pirarucu conservation in floodplain environments. These initiatives strengthen community organization and prepare local advisors to support sustainable fishing practices (InfoAmazonia, 2023). Additionally, in 2024, the Fundação Amazônia Sustentável (FAS) provided training courses to over 100 people involved in the pirarucu production chain in the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve (RDS), Amazonas. The initiative, funded by Positivo Tecnologia through the Bioeconomy Priority Program (PPbio), aims to improve product traceability using technological innovations. Benefiting 56 fishery managers and 45 families across three communities—Mangueira, Catite, and Jussara—the project focuses on strengthening infrastructure, advancing technology, boosting the local economy, and improving commercial intelligence. The training covers best practices in handling, monitoring, and processing the fish, contributing to the development of a digital traceability system via blockchain. This system will enhance transparency, food safety, and market credibility while ensuring fair pricing for local fishers. Future plans for 2025 include a technology workshop, an e-commerce platform for pirarucu sales, the construction of a floating facility, and the renovation of a fish processing unit in Fonte Boa to obtain the State Inspection Seal (SIE), allowing legal commercial distribution (FAS, 2025).
In the Jaú National Park, there is small-scale wood extraction for the construction of structures such as houses and boats, regulated by Commitment Agreements in the Unini and Jaú rivers, where the areas used by riverside and quilombola communities are located. Additionally, vines and Brazil nuts are harvested for commercial and domestic use within the communities (ICMBIO, 2023).
In the Middle Solimões region, the Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development (IDSM) has been a pioneer in participatory pirarucu management since 1999, under the supervision of Brazil’s Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation (MCTI). The institute supports fishing communities in the Mamirauá and Amanã reserves and surrounding municipalities, promoting responsible fishing and species conservation. Its current strategy focuses on training local leaders to apply sustainable fishing practices in their communities. In April 2023 students from northern institutions participated in an 11-day course on shared fishery management, emphasizing pirarucu conservation in floodplain environments. These initiatives strengthen community organization and prepare local advisors to support sustainable fishing practices (InfoAmazonia, 2023). Additionally, in 2024, the Fundação Amazônia Sustentável (FAS) provided training courses to over 100 people involved in the pirarucu production chain in the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve (RDS), Amazonas. The initiative, funded by Positivo Tecnologia through the Bioeconomy Priority Program (PPbio), aims to improve product traceability using technological innovations. Benefiting 56 fishery managers and 45 families across three communities—Mangueira, Catite, and Jussara—the project focuses on strengthening infrastructure, advancing technology, boosting the local economy, and improving commercial intelligence. The training covers best practices in handling, monitoring, and processing the fish, contributing to the development of a digital traceability system via blockchain. This system will enhance transparency, food safety, and market credibility while ensuring fair pricing for local fishers. Future plans for 2025 include a technology workshop, an e-commerce platform for pirarucu sales, the construction of a floating facility, and the renovation of a fish processing unit in Fonte Boa to obtain the State Inspection Seal (SIE), allowing legal commercial distribution (FAS, 2025).
In the Jaú National Park, there is small-scale wood extraction for the construction of structures such as houses and boats, regulated by Commitment Agreements in the Unini and Jaú rivers, where the areas used by riverside and quilombola communities are located. Additionally, vines and Brazil nuts are harvested for commercial and domestic use within the communities (ICMBIO, 2023).
Monitoring
Monitoring in federal conservation units is coordinated by the ICMBio through the “Monitora Program - National Biodiversity Monitoring Program” - and one of its objectives is to generate qualified information for the ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of federal UCs and the National System of Conservation Units in meeting their biodiversity conservation objectives (ICMBio, 2018). The information of the conservation units is available through the Biodiversity Portal managed by ICMBio and the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), which contains fauna and flora registers for each conservation unit (ICMBio, n.d). As for fire monitoring, the portal Queimadas is continuously monitoring outbreaks of wildfires and forest fires detected by satellites, calculating and predicting vegetation fire risk, and registering updated information per biome and state, even with the chance to focus on protected areas (INPE, 2020). Other monitoring system is the SIMUR, managed by the Fundação Vitória Amazonica (FVA), and operating since 2008 for aquatic chelonians, game, fisheries, collection of non-timber forest products, crop production, and deforestation monitoring with coverage including the National Park of Jaú and the Sustainable Development Reserve of Amanã.
Some of the longest and most recognized community based monitoring initiatives in the Amazonas is the one developed in the Sustainable Development Reserve Mamirauá, including the monitoring of the Pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) fishery and community forest management. Generally, monitoring programs develop databases with information partially available and not easily accessible to external users (Costa et al., 2018). For the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic a proposal for a monitoring system including different fauna and flora resources was established (Didier et al., 2017). Financial support, data quality, and data generation and retrieval require improvement to ensure the accuracy of data and more open data access policies to have a bigger impact on the management of the areas (Costa et al., 2018).
In November 2024, the Monitora Program celebrated 10 years of generating data to assess the effectiveness of the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC), support climate change adaptation, and guide biodiversity use and management (ICMBIO, 2024). The two national parks within the Central Amazon Conservation Complex remain part of the program (Programa MONITORA, 2024).
The Fundação Vitória Amazônica with the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic conducted geospatial analyses to provide information on environmental variables by comparing data from 2015—a year heavily impacted by environmental degradation—with observations from 2021 and 2022. The analysis focused on anthropogenic impacts, such as deforestation, degradation, and heat hotspots. Monitoring results indicated that conservation units, including the Tupé Sustainable Development Reserve, Rio Negro State Park (North and South Sectors), Anavilhanas National Park, and the Rio Branco – Jauaperi Extractive Reserve, do not appear to be significantly affected on a large scale (FVA, 2024).
The Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development and the Bioacoustics Applications Laboratory (LAB) of UPC have completed the deployment of a network of 22 sensors in the Mamirauá Reserve, in central Amazonas, Brazil, as part of the Providence project. This technology, which incorporates advanced artificial intelligence techniques applied to sound and image analysis, enables the identification and continuous monitoring of the rainforest’s biodiversity in this 1.12-million-hectare protected reserve—the first in the world to be monitored in real time. “Providence has made it possible, for the first time, to implement a precise system for recording and assessing the state of biodiversity in this region of the Amazon, providing an alert system that notifies us of any changes that could threaten the astonishing wildlife that inhabits it" (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2025).
Some of the longest and most recognized community based monitoring initiatives in the Amazonas is the one developed in the Sustainable Development Reserve Mamirauá, including the monitoring of the Pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) fishery and community forest management. Generally, monitoring programs develop databases with information partially available and not easily accessible to external users (Costa et al., 2018). For the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic a proposal for a monitoring system including different fauna and flora resources was established (Didier et al., 2017). Financial support, data quality, and data generation and retrieval require improvement to ensure the accuracy of data and more open data access policies to have a bigger impact on the management of the areas (Costa et al., 2018).
In November 2024, the Monitora Program celebrated 10 years of generating data to assess the effectiveness of the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC), support climate change adaptation, and guide biodiversity use and management (ICMBIO, 2024). The two national parks within the Central Amazon Conservation Complex remain part of the program (Programa MONITORA, 2024).
The Fundação Vitória Amazônica with the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic conducted geospatial analyses to provide information on environmental variables by comparing data from 2015—a year heavily impacted by environmental degradation—with observations from 2021 and 2022. The analysis focused on anthropogenic impacts, such as deforestation, degradation, and heat hotspots. Monitoring results indicated that conservation units, including the Tupé Sustainable Development Reserve, Rio Negro State Park (North and South Sectors), Anavilhanas National Park, and the Rio Branco – Jauaperi Extractive Reserve, do not appear to be significantly affected on a large scale (FVA, 2024).
The Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development and the Bioacoustics Applications Laboratory (LAB) of UPC have completed the deployment of a network of 22 sensors in the Mamirauá Reserve, in central Amazonas, Brazil, as part of the Providence project. This technology, which incorporates advanced artificial intelligence techniques applied to sound and image analysis, enables the identification and continuous monitoring of the rainforest’s biodiversity in this 1.12-million-hectare protected reserve—the first in the world to be monitored in real time. “Providence has made it possible, for the first time, to implement a precise system for recording and assessing the state of biodiversity in this region of the Amazon, providing an alert system that notifies us of any changes that could threaten the astonishing wildlife that inhabits it" (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2025).
Research
Anavilhanas and Jaú NPs have operational bases for surveillance (Detzel Consultores Asociados, 2018), while Mamirauá Sustainable Development Institute has laboratories and floating field bases and Headquarters with facilities for research and collections (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, 2020b). Vitória Amazônica Foundation (FVA) undertakes research for different conservation units including Jaú and Anavilhanas NPs and Amanã SDR, with headquarters in Manaus and a Geoprocessing Laboratory (Fundacao Vitoria Amazonica, 2020). Mamirauá Sustainable Development Institute consists of research groups in different topics including primates, fish, aquatic mammals, and forest ecology, among others (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, 2020a). The Amazonian Biodiversity Studies Centre (CENBAM) was created in 2009 and has been undertaking a Research Program on Biodiversity (PPBio) created in 2004 including several regional centers, including in Jaú and Anavilhanas NP and Mamirauá SDR (PPBIO/CENBAM, 2012).
In December 2022, the Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) conducted its final field expedition of the year along the Unini River in Barcelos, Amazonas, which passes through three conservation units in the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic. The expedition included drone surveys to capture high-resolution images of ten communities, supporting the creation of detailed maps to be shared with residents in the coming year. Additionally, FVA tested new aerial image analysis methodologies, including mapping Brazil nut trees and piloting a system for counting pirarucu fish in nearby lakes. These efforts align with FVA’s broader initiatives, such as environmental education workshops aimed at reducing forest fires (FVA, 2022a).
In December 2022, the Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) conducted its final field expedition of the year along the Unini River in Barcelos, Amazonas, which passes through three conservation units in the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic. The expedition included drone surveys to capture high-resolution images of ten communities, supporting the creation of detailed maps to be shared with residents in the coming year. Additionally, FVA tested new aerial image analysis methodologies, including mapping Brazil nut trees and piloting a system for counting pirarucu fish in nearby lakes. These efforts align with FVA’s broader initiatives, such as environmental education workshops aimed at reducing forest fires (FVA, 2022a).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Despite persistent challenges related to human, technical, and financial resources to manage protected areas, regional initiatives such as the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic and the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve play a crucial role in enhancing the effectiveness of management and governance in addressing external threats to the Central Amazon Conservation Complex. These initiatives, which involve protected areas either fully or partially, contribute to coordinated management strategies that mitigate pressures outside the site. Additionally, they support adaptive responses to the growing impacts of climate change, including altered hydrological cycles and rising temperatures. By fostering collaboration among stakeholders and implementing integrated conservation approaches, these governance mechanisms strengthen the resilience of the protected areas and help address both current and emerging threats.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
The management system within the Central Amazon Conservation Complex demonstrates overall effectiveness, particularly in ensuring conservation outcomes and providing essential services. Jaú and Anavilhanas National Parks are classified as effectively managed, with high scores in conservation performance and service provision. However, both face challenges in addressing unauthorized activities. Amanã and Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserves are rated as moderately effectively managed, showing strong conservation results but struggling with significant resource constraints, highlighting limited availability of personnel, technical capacity, equipment, and financial resources. These limitations hinder enforcement efforts and management actions, suggesting that while conservation objectives are being met, strengthening resource allocation and governance capacity is essential for improving overall management effectiveness.
The overall assessment of protection and management reflects a relatively effective management system, supported by strong legal and governance frameworks, stakeholder involvement, and integration into broader planning systems. Regional initiatives such as the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic and the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve play a crucial role in enhancing the effectiveness of management and governance. Conservation efforts, particularly community engagement in resource monitoring and sustainable use, have shown positive outcomes, such as in the recovery of pirarucu populations. However, significant concerns remain, particularly in ensuring adequate staff capacity, training, and development for protected areas, as well as integrating specific measures to safeguard their outstanding values from the adverse effects of climate change within planning systems, which currently rely heavily on external support. Tourism presents both opportunities and challenges; while it can support conservation and local livelihoods, service capacity and infrastructure need improvement. The management system effectively addresses external threats, yet internal challenges, such as enforcement and resource constraints, require further attention.
Good practice examples
The agreements with local community for collaboration in ecotourism management and local guidance for accessing to the Mamirauá and Amanã Reserves (Peralta et al., 2019) demonstrate to be effective for services quality and tourism management. Community based monitoring programme developed in the Lower Rio Negro Mosaic for turtles monitoring and conservation (WCS, 2017), achieved positive results for raising awareness among community about conservation and sustainable use of these species.
Ongoing ecological processes in the development of terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems
Low Concern
Trend
Stable
Although some threats impact the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of the Amazon Conservation Complex—such as wildfires that destroy riparian forests, land clearing for subsistence agriculture (slash-and-burn), inadequate waste collection and sanitation affecting river water quality, small-scale artisanal mining, and water pollution—(Sociedade Civil Mamirauá and SEMA Amazonas, 2020; ICMBIO, 2023a), most of these threats are localized and do not appear to cause significant disruptions to ongoing ecological processes. For instance, the Jaú River remains in good conservation condition, indicating the resilience of certain ecosystems within the complex (ICMBIO, 2023a).
Ongoing biological processes in the colonization, succession and evolution of vegetation
Data Deficient
Trend
Data Deficient
Main concern regarding the ongoing biological processes in the colonization, succession and evolution of vegetation is related to the potential effects of increasing logging activities, especially those around the area of the Rio Negro Bridge in the State of Amazonas (MMA et al., 2017) and those identified by the management effectiveness evaluation of the Anavilhanas National Park, where the 2019 report evaluated the conservation of the Igapos Flora as in “intervention” (ICMBio, 2020). However, overall available data is not sufficient to determine the current state and trend for this value.
High diversity of habitats
Low Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
Threats present in the Amazon Conservation Complex—such as the unsustainable use of resources associated with riverside settlements, plastic pollution, potential impacts from cargo ships in the Anavilhanas archipelago, and dam construction, all exacerbated by climate change—could contribute to habitat degradation and fragmentation. However, given the overall good state of conservation of the site's protected areas, there is no evidence to suggest a decline in habitat diversity.
Extermely high diversity of primates
Low Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
The Ateles sp. is reported as one of the species threatened by hunting or illegal trade according to the 2019 management effectiveness evaluation in Anavilhanas National Park (ICMBio, 2020). Some studies report that populations of the black‐headed squirrel monkeys (S. vanzolinii) remained stable, according to the monitoring between 2009 and 2013 in the Mamirauá SDR (Pain et al., 2019). However, a study (Gomes et al., 2024) assessing the role of protected areas for Brazilian primates predicts that some taxa including S. vanzolinii would lose >98% of their environmental suitable area under various climate change and land use scenarios. Overall, a significant reduction in primate species richness is projected for the central and eastern Amazon region (Gomes et al., 2024).
Rare and endangered freshwater species
Low Concern
Trend
Stable
Conservation Units comprising the World Heritage site are carrying out better management measures for fishing quotas and practices, which are presenting positive results, especially for the pirarucu (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, 2020a). However, there remains a risk for the freshwater diversity, caused by the hunting practices identified in the Anavilhanas NP management effectiveness assessment of 2019 (ICMBio, 2020), and by some fishing practices and tourism activities (da Silva et al., 2018; Botero et al., 2014). The integration of the community in monitoring programs show positive impacts on community education, practices and data collection to support the sustainable use and conservation of freshwater species.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Stable
Conditions of the values of the site present a low concern and a stable trend without significant changes compared to previous reports. The integration of community in monitoring programs and tourism management is showing positive results in terms of raising awareness and implementing sustainable practices for the recognition and protection of the site's biodiversity values. The resilience of key areas, such as the Jaú River, reflects the continued stability of terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. While the site continues to support a high diversity of habitats, pressures from climate change, plastic pollution, and resource extraction could pose risks to long-term integrity. However, comprehensive data is lacking to determine trends for some specific values.
Additional information
Importance for research,
Contribution to education
Research and community monitoring programs are improving local community capacity for sustainable use (Science X Network, 2019; WCS, 2017).
Food,
Legal subsistence hunting of wild game,
Collection of wild plants and mushrooms,
Fishing areas and conservation of fish stocks
The natural resources of the property provide for subsistence livelihoods of small indigenous communities within the property.
The current lack of law enforcement and park rangers due to lack of funding may encourage overexploitation of fishing stocks and game. The effects of climate change are more difficult to predict but it is expected that it will affect rainfall patterns, which can negatively affect food availability.
The community based tourism in Amanã and Mamirauá Reserves and the community monitoring programs are contributing to the sustainable use of biodiversity. As a result of these efforts, the knowledge and incomes of local communities are improving as well as their participation in the conservation.
| № | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fisheries Management Program and the Nucleus of Innovation and Sustainable Technologies (Nits) Mamirauá Institute of Sustainable Development, SEBRAE, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply, Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio), Tefé City Hall. | The project “Geographical Indication Pirarucu Manejado de Mamirauá” is a marketing tool to attract buyers from outside the state of Amazonas and regulate the price of the domestic market so that the producer receives a fairer value for the production |
https://www.Mamirauá.org.br/noticias/manejo-pirarucu-teve-aumento-na-producao-pescado
|
| 2 | Partnership for the Conservation of Amazon Biodiversity of USAID | Development of interpretative products for guides and boat operators in Anavilhanas National Park. |
https://pcabhub.org/en-us/news/pcab-news-highlights/new-products-will-help-visitor-experience-at-anavilhanas-national-park
|
| 3 | Mamirauá Institute of Sustainable Development, The Sense of Silence Foundation, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Amazonas Federal University (UFAM) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation | The Providence Project installed prototype units in April 2018 in the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve with camera traps, a thermal sensor, and a microphone to capture images and sounds of animals in tall trees. |
http://www.projectprovidence.org/about-us/
|
| 4 | Institute for Ecological research | LIRA project - Integrated Legacy of the Amazon Region, approved in 2018, by the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES), with R$ 45 million from the Amazon Fund for the strengthening and consolidation of management of 83 protected areas in the Legal Amazon, including the Lower Rio Negro. |
https://www.ipe.org.br/en/
|
| 5 | Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio) US Forest Service (USFS), US Agency for International Development (USAID) German Cooperation for Sustainable Development (GIZ). | 'Gosto da Amazônia' project, consists on the achieving of special markets in Rio de Janeiro for the sustainable managed pirarucu. |
https://www.Mamirauá.org.br/noticias/manejo-pirarucu-teve-aumento-na-producao-pescado
|
| 6 | Instituto de Conservação e Desenvolvimento Sustentável da Amazônia (Idesam). Partnership for Forest. EMBRAPA. Fundação Amazonas Sustentável (FAS). Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá | The Priority Programme of Bioeconomy (PPBio) is an investment mechanism for bioeconomy based on a Brazilian Government fiscal incentive policy, set up in 2018, to boost investments into biodiversity in the Western Amazon |
https://bioeconomia.org.br
|
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
ALBERT J. & CRAMPTON, W. 2001. Five new species of Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes, Teleostei) from an Upper Amazonian floodplain, with descriptions of electric organ discharges and ecology. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw. 12 (3): 241–266.
|
| 2 |
Amazonas Governo do Estado, Secretaria do Medio Ambiente, Sociedad Civil Mamiruau (2019). Plano de Gestão da Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Amanã (Version for consult) [Online] Available at: http://meioambiente.am.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Pl… (Accessed 3 May 2020).
|
| 3 |
Anderson, J. C.; Bradley, J. P.; Palacea, V. P. 2016. Microplastics in aquatic environments: Implications for Canadian ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 218, 269-280 p.
|
| 4 |
Andrade MC, Winemiller KO, Barbosa PS, Fortunati, A.; Chelazzi, D.; Cincinelli A. Giarrizzo, T. 2019. First account of plastic pollution 98 impacting freshwater fishes in the Amazon: Ingestion of plastic debris by piranhas 99 and other serrasalmids with diverse feeding habits. Environ Pollut 244: 766–773.
|
| 5 |
Andrady A. L., Neal M. A.2009Applications and societal benefits of plastics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1977–1984 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0304)
|
| 6 |
Andrady, A. L. Microplastics in the marine environment. 2011. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 1596–1605. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030
|
| 7 |
Arraut, E.M., Arraut, J.L., Marmontel, M., Mantovani, J.E., Novo, E.M. (2017). Bottlenecks in the migration routes of Amazonian manatees and the threat of hydroelectric dams. Acta Amazonica, 47(1), pp.7-18.
|
| 8 |
Asher, C. (2018). Hunting, fishing causing dramatic decline in Amazon river dolphins [Online] Available at: https://news.mongabay.com/2018/06/hunting-fishing-causing-d… (Accessed 6 May 2020).
|
| 9 |
Ashtom, K.; Holmes, L.; Turner, A. 2010. Association of metals with plastic production pellets in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60(11):2050-5 doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.07.014;
|
| 10 |
Avio, C. G.; Cardelli, L. R; Gorbi, L.; Pellegrini, D.; Regoli, F. 2017. Microplastics pollution after the removal of the Costa Concordia wreck: First evidences from a biomonitoring case study. Environmental Pollution 227:207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.066.
|
| 11 |
Azevedo de Paiva, B. C. (2019). Impactos ambientais em Unidades de Conservação: Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas na visão dos profissionais envolvidos com a visitação. Revista Brasileirade Ecoturismo, São Paulo, v.12, n.1, pp. 67-77.
|
| 12 |
Botero, R., de Lima, D and Marmontel, M. (2014). Caiman and dolphin mortality associated to the piracatinga fishery in the mid Solimões river region - Amazonas. Amazonas, Brazil: Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve, pp.1-60.
|
| 13 |
Bourgoin, C., Beuchle, R., Branco, A., Carreiras, J., Ceccherini, G., Oom, D., ... & Sedano, F. (2025). Extensive fire-driven degradation in 2024 marks worst Amazon forest disturbance in over two decades. EGUsphere, 2025, 1-15.
|
| 14 |
CRAMPTON, W., HULEN, K., ALBERT, J. 2004. Sternopygus branco: A New Species of Neotropical Electric Fish (Gymnotiformes: Sternopygidae) from the Lowland Amazon Basin, with Descriptions of Osteology, Ecology, and Electric Organ Discharges. Copeia 2: 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-03-105R1.
|
| 15 |
CRAMPTON, W., THORSEN, D., ALBERT, J. 2005. Three New Species from a Diverse, Sympatric Assemblage of the Electric Fish Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes: Gymnotidae) in the Lowland Amazon Basin, with Notes on Ecology. Copeia 1: 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-03-242R2.
|
| 16 |
Camacho M, Herrera A, Gómez M, Acosta-Da-cal A, Martínez I, Henríquez-Hernández LA, et al. Organic pollutants in marine plastic debris from Canary Islands beaches. Sci Total Environ [Inter-net]. 2019;662:22–31. Available from: https://doi.or-g/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.422
|
| 17 |
Cole, M.; Lindeque, P.; Halsband, C. Galloway, T. S. 2011. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62, p. 2588–2597.
|
| 18 |
Costa, D.C., Pereira H.S., Marchand, G.A., Silva, S.C. (2018). Challenges of Participatory Community Monitoring of Biodiversity in Protected Areas in Brazilian Amazon. Diversity 2018, 10, 61, pp. 1-11.
|
| 19 |
D'Cruze, N., et al. (2017). A review of wildlife ecotourism in Manaus, Brazil. Nature Conservation, 22, pp.1-16.
|
| 20 |
Detzel Consultores Associados S/S EPP. (2018). Parcerias ambientais público-privadas Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas e Parque Nacional do Jaú: Projeto piloto. Brasília: Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade ICMBio, pp-1-606.
|
| 21 |
Didier, K. and Estupiñán, G.M. (2017). Plano de Monitoramento do Mosaico de Áreas Protegidas do Baixo Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brasil. Manaus, Amazonas: Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS Brasil) e o Conselho do Mosaico do Baixo Rio Negro, pp. 1-267.
|
| 22 |
EBC (2023). Pesquisa identifica presença de plástico em peixes no Amazonas. . [Online] Available at: https://radios.ebc.com.br/tarde-nacional-amazonia/2023/07/p… [Accessed 28 February 2025].
|
| 23 |
Fundação Amazonas Sustentável (FAS), Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente do Amazonas (Brazil). Action Plan for the Central Amazon Biosphere Reserve: PARBAC (2021-2024): executive summary. [Online] Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379012 [Accessed 5 February 2025].
|
| 24 |
Fundação Amazônia Sustentável (FAS) (2025). Manejadores de pirarucu são beneficiados com cursos para aprimorar processo de rastreabilidade do pescado. [Online] Available at: https://fas-amazonia.org/manejadores-de-pirarucu-sao-benefi… [Accessed 25 February 2025].
|
| 25 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (1998). Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional do Jaú. Manaus, Brasil: Fundação Vitória Amazônica, IBAMA, pp. 1-258.
|
| 26 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (2020). Geoprocessing-LAB [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/en/what-we-do/geopolitics-of-conserv… (Accessed 30 April 2020).
|
| 27 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (2023c) Condutores de visitantes de UCs do Mosaico do Baixo Rio Negro recebem capacitação. [Online] Available at: em: https://www.fva.org.br/condutores-de-visitantes-de-ucs-do-m… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 28 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (2023d) FVA participa de curso de multiplicadores de manejo de pirarucu. [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/fva-participa-de-curso-de-multiplica… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 29 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (2024) Monitoramento Ambiental como Ferramenta de Gestão Territorial. [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NT02-Moni… [Accessed 5 February 2025].
|
| 30 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) (2022a). FVA realiza oficinas sobre educação ambiental para redução de incêndios florestais e sobrevoo de drone no rio Unini. [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/fva-realiza-oficinas-sobre-educacao-… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 31 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) (2022b). FVA realiza oficinas sobre educação ambiental para redução de incêndios florestais e sobrevoo de drone no rio Unini. [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/fva-realiza-oficinas-sobre-educacao-… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 32 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) (2022c). Atores da área de turismo participam de encontro em Novo Airão. [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/atores-da-area-de-turismo-participam… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 33 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) (2023a). FVA capacita jovens protagonistas do Mosaico do Baixo Rio Negro . [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/fva-capacita-jovens-protagonistas-do… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 34 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) (2023b). Mais uma turma de brigadistas formada na Reserva da Biosfera. [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/mais-uma-turma-de-brigadistas-formad… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 35 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) (2023e). FVA realiza workshop sobre Redução de Riscos e Ameaças Socioambientais no Mosaico do Baixo Rio Negro. [Online] Available at: https://mosaicodobaixorionegro.eco.br/fva-realiza-workshop-… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 36 |
Fundação Vitória Amazônica (FVA) (2024). Riscos e Ameaças Socioambientais no Mosaico do Baixo Rio Negro: recomendações e estratégias participativas. # 03 Nota Técnica para Políticas Públicas. [Online] Available at: https://www.fva.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NT03-Risc… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 37 |
GEF. (2019). Amazon Sustainable Landscapes Progress Report – 2018/2019. World Bank, WWF, UNDP [Online] Available at: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/407141582652061822/64857-AS… (Accessed 18 May 2020).
|
| 38 |
Gomes, L. B., Gonçalves, G. R., Velazco, S. J. E., de Moraes, K. F., Marques Neto, O. P., Santos, F. D. S., ... & Lima, M. G. M. (2024). Conservation challenges for Brazilian primates and the role of protected areas in a changing climate. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 31356.
|
| 39 |
ICMBio (2020). SAMGe Sistema de Análise e Monitoramento de Gestão [Online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/ (Accessed 4 May 2020).
|
| 40 |
ICMBio. (n.d). Sobre o Portal do la Biodiversidade., [Online] Available at: https://portaldabiodiversidade.icmbio.gov.br/portal/about (Accessed 06 May 2020).
|
| 41 |
IUCN (2003). World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation, Central Amazon Conservation Complex (Brazil).
|
| 42 |
IUCN Consultation (2014). IUCN Confidential Consultation – Central Amazon Conservation Complex, Brazil
|
| 43 |
IUCN Consultation (2020). IUCN Confidential Consultation – Central Amazon Conservation Complex, Brazil
|
| 44 |
IUCN Red List (2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/
|
| 45 |
InfoAmazonia (2023). Manejo de pirarucú: Cuando la ciencia y las comunidades se unen para generar ingresos en la Amazonía. [Online] Available at: https://infoamazonia.org/es/2023/09/01/manejo-de-pirarucu-c… [Accessed 5 February 2025].
|
| 46 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2017). Plano de Manejo Do Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas.
|
| 47 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2020). Plano Interpretativo do Parque Nacional do Jaú. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/uni… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 48 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2022a). Relatório de Visitação em Unidades de Conservação Federais – 2022. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/public… [Accessed 16 February 2025].
|
| 49 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023a). PLANO DE MANEJO DO PARQUE NACIONAL DO JAU.
|
| 50 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023b). Painel de Resultados por Unidade de Conservação. PARQUE NACIONAL DE ANAVILHANAS [Online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/Uc/661 [Accessed 20 February 2025].
|
| 51 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023c). Painel de Resultados por Unidade de Conservação. PARQUE NACIONAL DO JAÚ [Online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/Uc/698 [Accessed 20 February 2025].
|
| 52 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023d). Painel de Resultados por Unidade de Conservação. RESERVA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO SUSTENTÁVEL AMANÃ [Online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/Uc/1252 [Accessed 20 February 2025].
|
| 53 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023e). Painel de Resultados por Unidade de Conservação. RESERVA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO SUSTENTÁVEL MAMIRAUÃ [Online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/Uc/1257 [Accessed 20 February 2025].
|
| 54 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023f). Unidades de conservação entram em temporada de prevenção a incendios. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 55 |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2024). Maior programa de monitoramento da biodiversidade da América Latina completa 10 anos. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 27 February 2025].
|
| 56 |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais -INPE. (2020). Monitoramento dos Focos Ativos por Estado [Online] Available at: http://www.inpe.br/queimadas/estatistica_estados (Accessed 30 April 2020).
|
| 57 |
Instituto Socioambiental. (n.d). Unidades de Conservação no Brasil [Online] Available at: https://uc.socioambiental.org/ (Accessed 29 April 2020).
|
| 58 |
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (2020a). Em 2019, manejo de pirarucu teve aumento de 26% na produção de pescado. 26 March [Online] Available at: https://www.mamiraua.org.br/noticias/manejo-pirarucu-teve-a… (Accessed 2 May 2020)
|
| 59 |
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (2020b). Home [Online] Available at: https://www.mamiraua.org.br (Accessed 2 May 2020).
|
| 60 |
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (2024). Autorização para manejo sustentável do pirarucu é concedida a grupo da RDS Amanã. [Online] Available at: https://mamiraua.org.br/noticias/autorizacao-pirarucu [Accessed 27 February 2025].
|
| 61 |
Leung, Y.F., Spenceley, A., Hvenegaard, Hvenegaard, G., Buckley, R.C. (2019). Turismo e gestão da visitação em áreas protegidas. Diretrizes para sustentabilidade. Série Diretrizes para melhores Práticas para Áreas Protegidas. Brasil: IUCN, pp.1-136.
|
| 62 |
Lopes Pena, P.G., Northcross, A., Lima, M. A., Rêgo Franco, R. C. (2020). The crude oil spill on the Brazilian coast in 2019: the question of public health emergency. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 36(2), pp.1-6.
|
| 63 |
MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente). 2015. Gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos na Amazônia: a metodologia e os resultados de sua aplicação. www.ibam.org.br/media/ arquivos/estudos/girs_amazonia_1.pdf. Viewed 12 Nov 2018.
|
| 64 |
Ministério do Meio Ambiente – MMA, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio and Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas - PNA (2017). Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas [Online] Available at: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/plano-de-ma… (Accessed 2 May 2020).
|
| 65 |
Mosaico do Baixo Rio Negro (n.d.). Homepage. [Online] Available at: https://mosaicodobaixorionegro.eco.br [Accessed 16 February 2025]
|
| 66 |
Nakazono, E.M., Magnusson, W.E. (2016). Unsustainable Management of Arumã (Ischnosiphon polyphyllus [Poepp. & Endl.] Körn.) by the Novo Airão Artisans Association, Rio Negro, Amazon, Brazil. Econ Bot 70, p.p. 132–144
|
| 67 |
OECD. (2015). Protected areas in OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Brazil 2015 [Online] Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-environment… (Accessed 4 May 2020).
|
| 68 |
PEGADO, T. S. S.; SCHMID, K.; WINEMILLER, K. O.; CHELAZZI, D.; CINCINELLI, A.; DEI, L.; GIARRIZZO, T. First evidence of microplastic ingestion by fishes from the Amazon River estuary. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN , v. 133, p. 814-821, 2018.
|
| 69 |
PPBIO/CENBAM (2012). Programa de Pesquisa em Biodiversidade [Online] Available at: https://ppbio.inpa.gov.br/ (Accessed 4 May 2020).
|
| 70 |
Peralta, N., El Bizri, H., Pozza Paim, F., Valsecchi, J. (2019). Mamirauá Reserve: Primate-based Flooded Forest Conservation in the Amazon. Conservation Case Studies Part 4 Chapter 41, pp.326-330.
|
| 71 |
Portal Amazônia On (2023). Estudo revela presença de plástico no intestino de seis espécies de peixes na região amazônica. [Online] Available at: https://portalamazoniaon.com.br/estudo-revela-presenca-de-p… [Accessed 28 February 2025].
|
| 72 |
Prefeitura de Novo Airão (2024). Programa de Capacitação para Condutores de Visitantes é realizado no Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas. [Online] Available at: https://www.novoairao.am.gov.br/noticias_ver.php?id_noticia… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
|
| 73 |
Programa MONITORA (2024). Programa Nacional de Monitoramento da Biodiversidade. [Online] Available at: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiZGIwZjhkMTYtOGZiYS00… [Accessed 28 February 2025].
|
| 74 |
Prüssmann, J.S., Chaves, M. E., Suarez, C. (2017). Atlas of Conservation opportunities in the Amazon biome under climate change considerations Atlas de oportunidades de conservación en el bioma amazónico bajo consideraciones de cambio climático [Online] Available at: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=df5… (Accessed 1 May 2020).
|
| 75 |
Ramsar (n.d.). Ramsar Sites Information Service. Online] Available at: https://rsis.ramsar.org [Accessed 25 February 2025].
|
| 76 |
Ribeiro Marinho, R., Naziano Pantoja F.J., Édipo H.C. (2020). Analysis of Suspended Sediment in the Anavilhanas Archipelago, Rio Negro, Amazon Basin. Journals Water Volume 12 Issue 4, pp. 1-20.
|
| 77 |
Ribeiro-Brasil, D. R. G.; Torres, N. R.; Picanço, A. B.; Sousa, D. S.; Ribeiro, V. S.; Brasil, L. S.; Montag, L. F. A. 2020. Contamination of stream fish by plastic waste in the BrazilianAmazon. Environmental Pollution 244. 766-773 p.
|
| 78 |
Rocha, M., Feitosa, Y.O., Wittmann, F., Piedade, M. T., Resende, A.F., Assis, R.L. (2020). River damming affects seedling communities of a floodplain forest in the Central Amazon. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 34(1), pp. 192-203.
|
| 79 |
Rochman, C. M. et al. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in fish tissue may be an indicator of plastic contamination in marine habitats. Sci. Tot. Environ. 476, 622− 633 (2014)
|
| 80 |
Science X Network. (2019). Brazilian giant's comeback shows preservation and development of Amazon is possible [Online] Available at: https://phys.org/news/2019-05-brazilian-giant-comeback-amaz… (Accessed 7 May 2020).
|
| 81 |
Silva, A. Geotecnologias e a Problemática dos Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos em Tefé, Am. 2009.110f. Dissertação (pós-graduação) - Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM). Programa de pós-graduação em Ciências do Ambiente e Sustentabilidade na Amazônia, 2009. p. 110.
|
| 82 |
Silva, A., Bueno, M. (2017). The Amazon Protected Areas Program (ARPA): Participation, Local Development, and Governance in the Brazilian Amazon. Biodiversidade Brasileira. 7, pp. 122-137.
|
| 83 |
Silva, MA. (2019). Avaliação dos Atrativos Turísticos do Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas (AM). Master Thesis. Manaus, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Da Amazônia – Inpa
|
| 84 |
Simonetti, S., Botelho, E. and Moretti, E. (2022). Impactos da pandemia de Covid-19 no fluxo e práticas de visitação em parques nacionais no Brasil. Confins 56 | 2022. [Online] Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/confins/48585; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/confins.48585 [Accessed 5 February 2025].
|
| 85 |
Sociedade Civil Mamirauá / Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado do Amazonas (2020). Plano de gestão da Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Amanã: versão resumida e ilustrada. 102 p.
|
| 86 |
Stewart, M. (2019). An Analysis of Amazonian Forest Fires How does a wildfire start in a rainforest? [Online] Available at: https://towardsdatascience.com/an-analysis-of-amazonian-for… (Accessed 30 April 2020).
|
| 87 |
Tommaso Giarrizzo; Marcelo C Andrade; Kurt Schmid; Kirk O Winemiller; Micheline Ferreira; Tamyris Pegado; David Chelazzi; Alessandra Cincinelli; Philip M Fearnside. 2019. Amazonia: the new frontier for plastic pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, doi:10.1002/fee.2071
|
| 88 |
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2025) 'Una reserva de la Amazonia central, en Brasil, primera del planeta monitorizada íntegramente en tiempo real, por el Instituto Mamirauá y la UPC'. [Online] Available at: https://www.upc.edu/es/sala-de-prensa/noticias/una-reserva-… [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 89 |
Vidal, M. D. (2018). Turismo interativo com botos (Inia geoffrensis) no Baixo Rio Negro, Amazônia Central. Ph.D Thesis. Brasil: Universidade Federal do Amazonas
|
| 90 |
Vidal, M.D., Santos, P.M., Oliveira, C.V., Melo, L.C. (2013). Perfil e percepção ambiental dos visitantes do flutuante dos botos, Parque Nacional de Anavilhanas, Novo Airão – AM. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo. São Paulo, 7(3), pp. 419-435.
|
| 91 |
Vidal, MD., Santos, PMC., Simonetti, SD. and Siciliano, S. (2024). Ecoturismo com Fauna Silvestre em Áreas Protegidas do Baixo Rio Negro, Amazônia Brasileira: caracterização, desafios e potencialidades. Turismo: Visão e Ação, 26, e19646. [Online] Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/tva/a/HZGXS7D6VZWBBLFP6qtyB7F/?form… [Accessed 15 February 2025].
|
| 92 |
WCS (2017). Participatory Monitoring and Conservation of Turtles in the Brazilian Amazon [Online] Available at: https://measures.wcs.org/Metric-Details/m/49 (Accessed 3 May 2020).
|
| 93 |
World Heritage Committee (2015). Decision: 39 COM 8E Central Amazon Conservation Complex - Adoption of Retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (Brazil). In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th Session (Bonn, 2015). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6407 [Accessed November 2020].
|
| 94 |
da Silva, V.M., Freitas, C.E.C., Dias, R.L., Martin, A.R. (2018). Both cetaceans in the Brazilian Amazon show sustained, profound population declines over two decades. PLoS ONE 13(5), pp.1-12.
|