Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks

Country
Brazil
Inscribed in
2001
Criteria
(ix)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
The two sites included in the designation contain flora and fauna and key habitats that characterize the Cerrado – one of the world’s oldest and most diverse tropical ecosystems. For millennia, these sites have served as refuge for several species during periods of climate change and will be vital for maintaining the biodiversity of the Cerrado region during future climate fluctuations. © UNESCO
© IUCN/Elena Osipova

Summary

2025 Conservation Outlook

Finalised on
11 Oct 2025
Good with some concerns
The conservation outlook for the Cerrado Protected Areas remains positive, despite ongoing and potential threats. The two components of the site, along with their surrounding areas, are generally well-preserved in terms of species diversity, ecosystems, and ecological processes. While increasing grassland fires, climate change effects, expanding tourism, and invasive alien species pose challenges, effective management strategies have helped mitigate their impacts. Notably, natural regeneration following the 2017 fires and the expansion of prescribed burns in Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park highlight the resilience of the ecosystem and the effectiveness of fire management efforts. However, continued monitoring and adaptive management will be necessary to address emerging threats and maintain the integrity of these protected areas. Despite their overall well-preserved status, localized risks persist. The effects of climate change, such as rising temperatures and shifting rainfall patterns, may intensify fire risks and disrupt ecosystem dynamics over time. Additionally, while information on dam construction and invasive species remains limited, biological isolation is a concern, particularly for Emas National Park. Its relatively small size and surrounding agricultural expansion restrict habitat connectivity, potentially affecting the viability of key species. In terms of protection and management, effectiveness assessments indicate that while Emas National Park's management remains "effective," Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park continues to be classified as "moderately effective," requiring further efforts to enhance its conservation strategies.

Current state and trend of VALUES

Low Concern
Despite several current and potential threats related to increasing grassland fires and effects of climate change, increasing tourism and recreational activities, and the presence of invasive alien species in the Cerrado Protected Areas, the two site components and their surrounding areas remain in an good state of conservation, both from the point of view of species, ecosystems and ecological processes. Observations of natural regeneration after the 2017 fires and the expansion of prescribed burns as part of the Integrated Fire Management strategy in Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park demonstrate resilience.

Overall THREATS

High Threat
The Cerrado Protected Areas remain relatively well-preserved; however, certain threats continue to pose localized risks to their ecological integrity. Grassland fires and increasing tourism and recreational activities have the potential to impact the site, although proactive fire management strategies have proven effective in mitigating the frequency and intensity of wildfires in both protected areas. Nevertheless, the broader effects of climate change—rising temperatures, decreasing humidity, and shifting precipitation patterns—could exacerbate fire risks and alter ecosystem dynamics over time. Additionally, while there was insufficient information to assess the potential threats posed by dam construction and invasive alien species, biological isolation remains a concern for Emas National Park. The Park’s small size, coupled with the expansion of agricultural activities in its surroundings, limits habitat connectivity and may hinder the long-term conservation of wide-ranging species, such as top predators and certain bird species.

Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT

Some Concern
Management effectiveness varies between the two protected areas. While Emas National Park's management has been consistently classified as "effective" in management effectiveness evaluations, Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park remains "moderately effective", meeting only the minimum requirements for conservation and public policies.
Conservation challenges persist, despite the overall effectiveness in aspects such as stakeholder and rightsholder involvement in decision-making processes, governance arrangements, education and interpretation programs, tourism and visitation management, and research. The weaker management aspects relate to a lack of qualified personnel, lack of conservation status of the surrounding landscape and a prioritisation of agriculture compared to conservation, as demonstrated by the proposed legislative decree 338/2021, which intends to reduce the National Park’s conservation area by up to 73%. Even though the decision is still under discussion, the debate itself is already causing harm, by encouraging land invasion. Additionally, challenges remain regarding the completion of the land regularization process in Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park and ensuring the long-term implementation of the Integrated Fire Management program.

Full assessment

Click the + and - signs to expand or collapse full accounts of information under each topic. You can also view the entire list of information by clicking Expand all on the top left.

Description of values

Key habitats and species that characterize the Cerrado Ecoregion

Criterion
(x)
Cerrado Protected Areas (CPA) contains samples of all key habitats that characterize the Cerrado ecoregion – one of Earth’s oldest tropical ecosystems. Located in the Brazilian highland central plateau, both national parks – Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park and Emas National Park – are considered as the richest tropical savanna region in the world due to diversity of habitats and richness in species. It contains over 60% of all floral species described for the Cerrado, with between 350 and 400 species of vascular plants per hectare, including many endemic plants. It also contains almost 80% of all vertebrate species described for the Cerrado. With the exception of the Giant Otter, all of the Cerrado’s endangered large mammals occur in the site, such as the giant anteater, giant armadillo, maned wolf, jaguar and pampas deer, but also the rhea, the largest bird of South America and the Brazilian Merganser (Mergus octosetaceus), considered Critically Endangered worldwide, with a total population of less than 250 individuals (BirdLife International, 2021; Disconzi et al., 2024; ICMBIO, 2020). In addition, the site supports many rare small mammals and bird species that do not occur elsewhere in the Cerrado and a number of species new to science have been discovered in CPA (World Heritage Committee, 2015).

Key role in maintaining the biodiversity of the Cerrado Ecoregion

Criterion
(ix)
The area has played a key role in maintaining the biodiversity of the Cerrado Ecoregion. Due it its central location and altitudinal variation, it has acted as a relatively stable species refuge when climate change has caused the Cerrado to move north-south or east-west. This role as a species refuge is ongoing as Earth enters another period of climate change. The site is also extremely important in maintaining the hydrological regime as, due to its geological features and soils, it is proving to be a key area for aquifer recharge and the alimentation of several watercourses that supply power to the Amazon basin and the Pantanal, in the basin of La Plata (World Heritage Committee, 2015).
Adaptation to climate change
CPA is a key site for Cerrado species adapting to climate change. CPA is very important as a base from which key species of fauna can move out to re-populate surrounding areas and remaining “islands” of natural and semi-natural vegetation within the Cerrado ecoregion (IUCN, 2001).
As of 2024, no detailed information regarding this value is available.
Ecological connectivity
CPA is included in the Cerrado-Pantanal biological corridor, which aims to conserve local mammal populations in the long term between Cerrado and Pantanal. However, by 2024 no recent evidence of management activities to conserve local mammal population in the Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor was found.

Assessment information

High Threat
While wildfires in grasslands remain the most significant threat to Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks, fire management strategies appear to be effective in reducing this risk. However, the impact of climate change on temperature, humidity, and precipitation in the Cerrado biome should not be underestimated, as it contributes to increased fire risk. On the other hand, although there is insufficient data to fully assess the effects of increasing tourism visitation and recreational activities in both protected areas, this threat remains a growing concern, particularly for Chapada dos Veadeiros, where visitor numbers have steadily risen. While trends for Emas National Park remain unclear due to limited data, increased recreational activities may put additional pressure on the World Heritage values of both parks. Ranching and agriculture pose further threats to the Cerrado ecoregion and rapid land use changes have been observed in the last decades having effects on key habitats, species and biodiversity of the aquatic, semi-aquatic, and terrestrial fauna, as well as water quality and availability.
Fire & Fire Management
(Fires from grasslands)
High Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Natural fires in the Cerrado are common, as grasslands and savannas have evolved under fire pressure (Fidelis et al., 2018; Alho et al., 2019). Natural fires usually occur in the wet season or in the seasonal transition months and with a frequency of three to eight years (Fidelis et al., 2018). Fire is a crucial factor for the conservation of the Cerrado ecosystems and their biodiversity, as it is necessary for flowering of herbaceous and subshrub species of savanna and grassland ecosystems. The suppression of fire has transformed savanna vegetation into forests, causing biodiversity losses and drastic changes in ecological processes, and current policies restricting fire management to protected areas under complex regulations do not help in re‐establishing an adequate fire regime for maintaining this diverse mosaic of vegetation types (Durigan and Ratter, 2015).
However, during the dry season (July to September) fires are a significant threat to both components of the Cerrado Protected Areas, i.e. Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park (CdVNP) and Emas National Park (ENP), especially due to the increasing intensity and frequency of conflagrations caused by human activities. In 2017, a megafire burned 504 km2 of the CdVNP (Fidelis et al., 2018). By September 30th 2019, a group of volunteers reported that over 6,000 hectares of land had been affected by a forest fire, which included 3,000 hectares in this National Park (GardaWorld, 2019). The intentional fires that reach the CdVNP almost all originate outside the Park, especially on the GO-239 highway (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
Despite the Cerrado accounting for 31,5% of fire hotspots in Brazil in 2024, where 9.7 million hectares were burned between January and December 2024 (Governo do Estado de Goiás, 2024; MapBiomas, 2025), the threat of fire in CdVNP has significantly decreased due to proactive fire management strategies. The Park expanded its prescribed burn areas by 63% compared to 2022, covering 14,000 hectares to reduce accumulated fuel in high-risk zones. By starting prescribed burns earlier and increasing their volume, fire managers created extensive firebreaks that helped control all incidents within the Park. The integration of helicopters and airplanes further improved efficiency by enabling access to remote areas. As a result, the Park recorded only four fire incidents during the season, demonstrating the effectiveness of these preventive measures in mitigating wildfire risks (ICMBIO, 2023a, 2023b, 2024). While Emas National Park also implements an integrated fire management approach, nearly 28,000 hectares burned in 2021 due to a loss of control while constructing firebreaks (Amoury, 2021), and 11.366 hectares burned in 2024 (Governo do Estado de Goiás, 2024).
Although integrated fire management appears to be effective in reducing wildfire threats, the effects of climate change on the Cerrado biome should not be underestimated. Authors such as Hofmann (2024) and SBPC (2024) establish that this biome is becoming significantly hotter and drier. The large-scale conversion of native vegetation into pasture and agricultural land significantly contributes to regional climate change by reducing evapotranspiration during the dry season, which, in turn, intensifies warming and lowers relative humidity. Additionally, there is a decline in both total rainfall and the number of rainy days across the northern and central Cerrado regions, except at the onset of the dry season. A clear trend of dry season lengthening and intensification is emerging.
Recreational Activities
(Increasing tourism visitation and recreational activities)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Currently, the threat persists as visitor numbers at Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park have increased over the years, rising from 62,477 in 2017 to 73,903 in 2018 and 79,347 in 2019 (Observatório do Turismo Estado de Goiás, n.d.). In 2020, visitation dropped to 63,928 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (Observatório do Turismo Estado de Goiás, 2020) but rebounded in 2021 to over 75,000 (Ministério do Turismo, 2022). For Emas National Park, it was not possible to establish a trend, as only 2020 data was available, showing 471 visitors due to park closures from April to November during pandemic (Observatório do Turismo Estado de Goiás, 2020).

According to results of field observations in in the District of São Jorge and its surroundings in CdVNP, several impacts were recognized especially in locations of greater influx of people, and where there is no control over visitation. Some of the main impacts included: the occurrence of erosion on the road and on the streets, the accumulation of garbage in improper places, running over of wild animals, graffiti on natural monuments (Domiciano et al., 2012). Some impacts could be directly related to the tourism activities and others to local communities’ activities (Domiciano et al., 2012). Real estate interests in the area is a raising issue as about 80 or 90% of the expansion area for the Park presents a conflict with real estate and speculation interests (Menegassi, 2017). Expansion of the São Jorge District towards the preservation area contiguous to the National Park is another indirect impact associated with tourism activity, which could increase pollution around the area (Domiciano et al., 2012). The collection and treatment of the solid wastes, which usually is buried or burned, sometimes near to the vegetation of riparian forests, was one of the impacts identified and caused by tourism lodges, according to some observations developed in order to assess impacts of land occupation in different natural areas in the Cerrado region, which included the Emas National Park in the study area (Alho et al., 2019). Concern about increased visitation is raised by some research, considering the biophysical conditions of CdVNP including landscape and endemic species, and recognizing that not all visitors have the environmental sensitivity necessary to enjoy these natural spaces without depredating them (França and Martins, 2020). According to the State Party, the trampling of fauna has increased considerably since the completion of the paving of the GO-239 highway, which cuts through the CdVNP, and also due to the increase in tourism in the Chapada dos Veadeiros region as a whole, in addition to the increase in visitation to the National Park.
In the region of the Emas National Park, the increase in traffic on the roads surrounding the park has also increased the number of animals being run over (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops, Terrestrial Animal Farming, Ranching & Herding
(Cattle grazing and crop cultivation)
High Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Ranching and agriculture are major threats to the Cerrado ecoregion and rapid land use changes have been observed in the last decades. About half of the tropical savanna of Cerrado has been converted to croplands, pastures, and planted forests for agribusiness, causing extreme fragmentation and habitat degradation and loss (Ferreguetti et al., 2019; Latrubesse et al., 2019; Colli, Vieira and Dianese, 2020). Both Chapada dos Veadeiros (CdVNP) and Emas National Parks (ENP) are almost entirely surrounded by agricultural and livestock areas (Santos et al., 2018; Borges and Silva, 2019; Finnegan et al., 2019), having effects on key habitats, species and biodiversity of the aquatic, semi-aquatic, and terrestrial fauna, as well as water quality and availability (Santos et al., 2018; Colli et al., 2020). There is livestock within the CdVNP, as permitted use, since it was an activity prior to the creation of the conservation unit (ICMBio, 2020a). Due to the rapid expansion of agriculture and livestock, as well as intensive local forest harvesting, ca. 137 animal species of the Cerrado are endangered (IUCN, 2013 in Colli et al., 2020). It also negatively affects the availability of water in hydrological basins of extreme importance to Brazil, since irrigation needed for agricultural activities in the Cerrado put strong pressure on water resources. Also, chemical pollution from pesticides is a major concern (CEPF, 2017; Latrubesse et al., 2019). Finally, because of the ecosystem fragmentation, the conservation units may not be able to guarantee the maintenance or representativeness of some key species (Latrubesse et al., 2019).
Data Deficient
By 2024, biological isolation remains a potential threat to Emas National Park, as the status of the protected area has not changed. Regarding dam construction and invasive alien species, no updated information was available to comprehensively assess their impact on the values of the Cerrado Protected Areas.
Unknown Threats
(Biological isolation )
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
A major threat to the Cerrado Protected Areas is biological isolation due to extensive agricultural activities in their surroundings. It refers particularly to Emas National Park as it is too small to provide the full range of habitat needed to conserve wide ranging species, such as top predators and some bird species (IUCN, 2001; UNEP-WCMC, 2011; ICMBio, 2009; Pukensis Tubelis, 2010). For instance, Finnegan et al. (2019) found that “closed reserves of the size of Emas National Park do not appear to be large enough to maintain long-term viable jaguar populations without any net immigration”, indicating that large carnivore populations inside Emas National Park to be at risk of becoming genetically isolated and demographically vulnerable.
By 2024, the situation of Emas National Park remains unchanged since the last Conservation Outlook assessment in 2020.
Renewable Energy
(Ongoing dam construction )
Data Deficient
Outside site
More than 291 hydropower plants 30MW are operating in the Cerrado, and 829 new ones are planned, with most heavily impacted areas in the Paraná and São Francisco basins, which concentrate 66% of the dams (planned and constructed). Habitat fragmentation and modified flood and sediment regimes could be caused by river damming (Latrubesse et al., 2019). Furthermore, increasing concerns over the projected construction of Small Hydroelectric Plants are being raised due to potential effects over Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, as well as the interruption of the main fauna corridor that connects the Park to the Tocantizinho River basin and local Natural Heritage Private Reserves (RPPN in Portuguese) (Governo do Estado De Goiás, 2017). Results of research on effects of hydroelectric dams within the Brazilian Legal Amazon, which involves the Tocantins/Araguaia basin in the Amazon forest, Cerrado, and Pantanal biomes, identified significant cumulative impacts over the frequency and duration of high and low pulses and the rate and frequency of water condition changes. Despite the small data set used, results indicate that multiple dams may magnify the hydrological impacts to critical aspects of the flood pulse, which is central to the ecological health of lowland tropical rivers (Timpe and Kaplan, 2017).
As of 2024, no information is available to assess this threat.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive alien species)
Data Deficient
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
The National Center for Biodiversity Assessment and Cerrado Research and Conservation (CBC) already has confirmed records of invasive alien species of animals and plants in more than half of the federal Conservation Units (UCs), especially in the southeast and mid-west regions of the Cerrado biome (ICMBio, 2020 b(f)). Extensive pine and eucalyptus plantations have been reported in the Cerrado region, including the Goiás State (CEPF, 2017). Some research developed in sample sites of the Cerrado Woodland in the Botanical Garden of Brasília showed evidence of reduction of density and abundance of native species as a result of invasive pine species (Cazetta and Zenni, 2019). Invasion by exotic trees could lead to a woody encroachment and affecting water availability (Honda and Durigan, 2016). Also, and according to surveys in different national parks, including the Emas NP, presence of dogs was registered. Dog's interactions with humans and wildlife can increase the risk of diseases for all of them and interferes with the spatial distribution of populations of wildlife species (Lessaa et al., 2016). Other regional studies in the Cerrado biome showed that naturalized graminoid species present invasion risks, additionally, factors like population density, proximity to urban centers and roads and agriculture areas, may increase the richness and population sizes of exotic invasive species (Guimarães et al., 2020).
As of 2024, no new information was found to assess this threat.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Mostly Effective
According to the management effectiveness evaluations of 2020 (Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park - CdVNP) and 2023 (Emas National Park), both protected areas have Advisory Councils (ICMBIO, 2023). The advisory council is a forum for discussion, negotiation, and management of the Conservation Unit and its area of influence, addressing environmental, social, economic, cultural, and political issues. It is formally established and linked to the management structure of the Conservation Unit. The CdVNP council is composed of 30 institutions, including Environmental Public Agencies, Public Authorities from Related Areas, Teaching and Research Institutions, the tourism sector, the Local Community Sector, the Private Natural Heritage Reserves Sector, the Agrobiodiversity Sector, and Non-Governmental Organizations (ICMBIO, n.d.a). The ENP council is composed by 16 institutions representing Environmental Public Agencies, Public Authorities from Related Areas, Teaching and Research Institutions, the agricultural sector, the tourism sector, the Private Natural Heritage Reserves Sector and Non-Governmental Organizations (ICMBIO, n.d.b). Since this body is established under the National System of Nature Conservation Units (SNUC) Law, it is expected to effectively engage stakeholders and rightsholders, including Indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes.
Legal framework
Some Concern
As a consequence of a decision of the Supreme Court taken in 2003, the CdVNP area returned to its former size of 65,515 ha. The Government of Brazil has been trying to re-establish the legal framework for the protection of the area inscribed on the World Heritage List. A presidential decree signed on 5th June 2017 set up the expansion of the boundaries of the CdVNP, re-establishing the national park status to most of the original area, except for land degraded by agricultural activities. Updated boundaries integrate part of the municipalities of Teresina de Goiás, Nova Roma and Sao Joao da Aliança. The final expansion covers 240,611 ha, adding important habitats areas for mammal species, while excluding the most degraded areas in the north of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2016). The approach of restoring legal protection to the largest extent possible within the existing property, and through establishing a mosaic of different protected areas within and outside the property to restore its integrity is a valid strategy (IUCN, 2013, 2016). In addition to this expansion, a process of land regularization of the protected area was started, with approximately 50 procedures for indemnification of properties located within the new limits of the National Park. Also, in May 2018, the Brazilian legislation changed the ICMBio procurement regime for the recruitment of firefighters, which would benefit the CdVNP and various other federal protected areas. The duration of contracts with fire brigades changed from six months to three years. With this change, the brigades now operate for a longer period of time, improving prevention measures for large fires and long-term firefighting strategies (State Party of Brazil, 2019a).
Regarding the expansion of the CdVNP, in 2021 a legislative decree project 338/2021, was proposed, which intends to reduce the National Park’s conservation area by up to 73%. The proposal seeks to annul the decree signed in 2017 by then-President Michel Temer, which expanded the park's conservation area from 65.000 hectares to 240.000 hectares. The justification given is that the expansion could leave hundreds of farmers without a source of income. Even though the decision is still under discussion, the debate itself is already causing harm, by encouraging land invasion (Cardim, 2022).
By contrast, land regularization in CdVNP has become essential for the territorial consolidation of the protected area and is considered crucial by ICMBio for expanding and developing activities in the area, it plays a vital role in managing conflicts arising from the park expansion (ICMBIO, 2021). However, by 2023 only 6% of its land had been incorporated by ICMBIO, 40% was with ongoing process, 19% were vacant/unclaimed areas identified by the state of Goiás, and 54% were lands with situation unknown.
Governance arrangements
Mostly Effective
The re-expansion of the CdVNP formalized in June 2017 was not free of resistance. Initially, a strict return to the original national park boundaries at the time of inscription was no longer an option due to the resistance of a group of landowners and unclear land tenure situation. However, after a public consultation process and meetings with rightsholders, a new extension was implemented, including territory of the local community Quilombola Kalunga. Several Natural Heritage Private Reserves (RPPN) were created around the Park, thanks to a great mobilization of civil society and private sector, triggered by the suspension of the park expansion decree in 2003 (State Party of Brazil, 2019a). Currently, the main shared governance forum is its Management Board; it now comprises government representatives of the five municipalities that compose the Park’s territory, as well as representatives from Private Reserves, tourist guides, communities, farmers, environmentalist NGOs, universities, State Government and other segments of the Federal Government, summing up to a total of 14 governmental representations and 15 non-governmental ones (State Party of Brazil, 2019b). Relationships with surrounding communities are relatively positive. Many longstanding and more recent residents of the surrounding areas have invested in conservation friendly enterprises and activities, including: ecotourism, creation of private nature reserves, transportation and guide services, inns, restaurants, hotels, arts and crafts, and others, the target audience for which essentially coincides with the stream of visitors and tourists to the CdVNP. Regarding the Emas National Park, there is an Advisory Council in place, which was modified in 2015 through Ordinance 1 of June 22, and grants 3 quotas for public environmental bodies, 4 quotas for public power bodies in related areas, 1 quota for academic and research institutions, 3 for associations in the agricultural sector, 3 for representatives of the tourism sector, 1 for the protected areas sector and a quota for civil society organizations (ICMBio, 2015). Since 2016, ICMBio has a Volunteering Program, as an opportunity for everyone to exercise their citizenship and contribute to a more balanced environment and improvement of the local quality of life. The population can work together with the ICMBio teams, in various actions for nature conservation such as research, visitation, communication, environmental education and protection (ICMBio, 2020c). Both, CdVNP and ENP are actively engaged in the program (ICMBio, 2020d and 2020e).
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Some Concern
The Cerrado Protected Areas belong to the ICMBio Regional Management 3 (Mid-west), which conducts assessments of infraction notices, issues opinions and authorizations for licensing, supports the socioenvironmental agenda of federal Conservation Units (UCs), promotes local and regional articulation and encourages mutual collaboration between teams (ICMBio, 2020b). The Chapada dos Veadeiros (CdVNP) and Emas National Parks (ENP) are not ecologically connected as part of a larger landscape, however, each of them is integrated into other initiatives and regional connectivity schemes. The CdVNP is inserted into a mosaic of protected areas that include the state Environmental Protection Area of Pouso Alto and 22 Natural Heritage Private Reserves (RPPN), the newly created Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station, in addition to the Kalunga Quilombola Territory (Santos et al., 2018; State Party of Brazil, 2019a). These are all part of the Cerrado Biosphere reserve, which focuses on restoration of altered areas and building of ecological corridors. Additionally, in 2018, a proposal was presented in order to obtain the formal recognition of the Veadeiros-Paranã Mosaic, which objective is to promote the integrated management of 42 protected areas of the Cerrado; it will be the mosaic with the highest concentration of protected areas in Brazil. For this purpose, a geographic survey has been carried out to complete the National Register of Conservation Units (CNUC) of 14 of the 42 UCs, between municipal and private reserves. Without the completed CNUC, the Ministry of Environment cannot legally recognize the mosaic (ICMBio, 2018a; FUNBIO, 2018a). The ENP on the other hand, is part of the biodiversity Corridor Emas-Taquari, which in turn is integrated into the Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor. It is located in the Cerrado region, comprises eight townships and its nuclei areas are both the Emas National Park and the Parque Estadual das Nascentes do Rio Taquari (Benites and Mamede, 2008). Conservation International Brazil along with more than a dozen partners, developed conservation and mobilization projects for local communities to implement the corridor (CI Brazil, 2007), however, there is no evidence of recent activity related with the corridor.
Although the Government of Brazil stated in 2020 that the CdVNP is inserted in a mosaic of protected areas, which includes the Pouso Alto Environmental Protection Area (APA) and 22 natural heritage private reserves (RPPNs), as well as the Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station and the Kalunga quilombo territory (State Party of Brazil, 2020), by 2024 there is no up-to-date information evidencing progress with regard to recognition and management actions related to this mosaic. There is also no recent evidence of management activities in the Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor, except for the Emas-Taquari Biodiversity Corridor Carbon Project, which began in 2010 and is set to run for 35 years (brCarbon, n.d.).
Boundaries
Some Concern
Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada Dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 2001 with an area of 235,970 ha, which had been expanded by a Federal decree the same year. However, following a ruling that the Federal decree was void, the CdVNP boundaries changed after inscription and reduced the Park to 65,500 ha in 2003. This loss of protection status caused serious concern and the World Heritage Committee requested the State Party to reinstate the appropriate legal protection regime over the entire World Heritage property (IUCN, 2019). A Presidential decree (5th of June 2017) expanded the area to 240,611 ha, including a mosaic of conservation units (private reserves, Quilombola Kalunga territory). The State Party submitted a proposal for a minor boundary modification of the site, which was approved in 2019 except for the excision of the area at the centre of the Chapada dos Veadeiros component (World Heritage Committee, 2019). The buffer zone remains the same: Pouso Alto Environmental Protection Area and 1,000 ha around the National Park (State Party of Brazil, 2019b). The State Party of Brazil (2019b) considers that with the expansion of the Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, the creation of the Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station in 2017 and the existence of the Natural Heritage Private Reserves, with all their areas in good conservation status, the level of protection of the site recognized as a World Heritage Site has been re-established. However, in 2021 a legislative decree project 338/2021, was proposed, which intends to reduce the National Park’s conservation area by up to 73%. The proposal seeks to annul the decree signed in 2017 by then-President Michel Temer, which expanded the park's conservation area from 65.000 hectares to 240.000 hectares. The justification given is that the expansion could leave hundreds of farmers without a source of income. Even though the decision is still under discussion, the debate itself is already causing harm, by encouraging land invasion (Cardim, 2022). By contrast, land regularization in CdVNP has become essential for the territorial consolidation of the protected area and is considered crucial by ICMBio for expanding and developing activities in the area, it plays a vital role in managing conflicts arising from the park expansion (ICMBIO, 2021). However, by 2023 only 6% of its land had been incorporated by ICMBIO, 40% was with ongoing process, 19% were vacant/unclaimed areas identified by the state of Goiás, and 54% were lands with situation unknown.
Overlapping international designations
Some Concern
The Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park has been part of the Cerrado Biosphere Reserve since its creation in 1994. However, neither the 2021 management plan, the 2022 integrated fire management plan, nor the state of conservation reports submitted to the World Heritage Committee mention any coordination between these two conservation designations. Additionally, no evidence was found of the existence of an action plan for the Cerrado Biosphere Reserve.
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Mostly Effective
The property has been the subject of several state of conservation reports (2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019), mainly because of loss of the protection status generated by the significant reduction of Chapada dos Veadeiros national park boundaries. While efforts have continued to effectively protect the OUV of the areas that were excised from the CdVNP after its World Heritage designation, it has been possible to re-establish its protection regime on an area extended to 24,0611 ha, at the end of a very long process (World Heritage Committee, 2012; UNESCO, 2012, 2017; State Party of Brazil, 2017). The 43rd session of the World Heritage Committee in June 2019, through decisions 43 COM 7B.22 and 43 COM 8B.42, made several requests to the State Party of Brazil, including: a) to ensure that the management of the conservation units (expansion of the CdVNP, the Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station and new private reserves within the property) is harmonized and focused on the protection of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property through development of an overarching Management Plan or other appropriate mechanisms; b) to continue the process of land regularization as a matter of priority and to submit a timeframe for its finalization, c) to ensure that the capacity to respond to fires is maintained in the long-term, particularly through the continued implementation of the Integrated Fire Management approach. The World Heritage Committee also recommend that the next report on the property include consideration of the effectiveness of the implementation of the protection and management requirements of the property in relation to its revised boundary (UNESCO, 2019).
In response to these Decisions, the State Party of Brazil delivered a new State of Conservation Report where significant progress was highlighted regarding: i) management actions and management effectiveness of CdVNP; ii) joint planning actions between de national park and Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station and new private reserves within the property; iii) Integrated Fire Management (IFM) strategy developed in the park has been consolidated and expanded through Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station adhesion and the capacity building course carried out with local Private Natural Heritage Reserves (RPPNs); iv) progress in land regularization (State Party of Brazil, 2020). Furthermore, an integrated fire management plan was developed in 2022 with the primary objective to reduce the occurrence of large wildfires to protect the site values, and in integration with other protected areas (MMA and ICMBIO, 2022). However, the legislative decree project 338/2021 proposed in 2021, which intends to reduce the National Park’s conservation area by up to 73% is of some concern.
Climate action
Data Deficient
The Chapada dos Veadeiros management plan does not include specific measures to protect its outstanding values from the negative impacts of climate change (ICMBIO, 2021). Additionally, there is no up-to-date management plan available for Emas National Park, making it impossible to determine whether such provisions exist.
Management plan and overall management system
Mostly Effective
The management of Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park (CdVNP) and Emas National Park (ENP) is carried out through separate management plans and is the responsibility of Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), a semi-autonomous agency under the federal Ministry of the Environment (MMA). It is based on the principle of Shared Governance, with mechanisms and institutional processes in which several players share authority and responsibility (State Party of Brazil, 2019b). However, there is no evidence of an integrated management mechanism including both protected areas.
As for Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, the site has a management plan updated in 2021, it identifies clearly the fundamental resources and values (ICMBIO, 2021), however, there are no clear desired outcomes and indicators. The last management effectiveness evaluation from 2022 with an index of 59% indicates that the park is considered as moderately effective, that is, the expectations and results achieved in the unit correspond to the minimum management aspects necessary for the conservation and socio-biodiversity public policies. The Inputs indicator achieved the highest value (86%), due to the appropriate availability of inputs for the development of management actions. The high values achieved by the Results indicators should also be noted (80%), demonstrating a good level of conservation of the Resources and Values, despite of significant challenges arising from internal or external pressures on the territory, along with the incidence of wildfires. The Context indicator achieved the lowest value in the park (23,6%), demonstrating a difficulty to avoid/mitigate the prohibited uses in the property (ICMBIO, 2022a).

Regarding Emas National Park, there is no up-to-date management plan available. The last management effectiveness evaluation available for 2023 with an index of 71,5% indicates that the park is considered as effective, that is, the objectives for which the protected area was created are being met. The Products and services indicator achieved the highest value (86%), suggesting that the permitted uses occurring within the site does not impact negatively its values. The high values achieved by the Results indicators (75%) indicating a good conservation status of the Resources and Values, despite considerable challenges resulting from both internal and external pressures on the area (ICMBIO, 2023e).
Law enforcement
Some Concern
The management effectiveness assessment of CdVNP for 2022 suggests that it has a surveillance plan; has a moderate staffing level and technical capacity, as well as financial resources directed towards this. The equipment availability for this action is sufficient, but high external support is needed in terms of human resources. Actions of the surveillance plan has been partially carried out (ICMBIO, 2022a).
Likewise, the management effectiveness assessment of ENP for 2023 indicates that it has a surveillance plan, but the staff level technical capacity, financial resources, equipment availability is moderate, only minimal external assistance is needed in terms of personnel, but the support from the environmental police and regional management is needed. Actions of the surveillance plan has been partially carried out (ICMBIO, 2023e).
Therefore, overall, although both Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks have surveillance plans in place, their implementation remains partial. These findings highlight the need for strengthened enforcement efforts and improved resource allocation to ensure effective protection of both parks.
Sustainable finance
Some Concern
In 2023 ICMBIO received its highest budget since its establishment in 2007, amounting to R$ 407 million—22.3% more than the previous year. According to the Directorate of Planning, Administration, and Logistics (Diplan), a substantial share of these resources will be allocated to prevention initiatives, such as prescribed burns (ICMBIO, 2023c). Nonetheless, it is unclear if these resources are adequate to implement management measures to maintain the two protected areas values.
The management effectiveness assessment of Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park underlines “Environmental Compensation and Financial Sustainability” as one of its key processes and “Implement a financial sustainability plan” as one of the management actions. Nonetheless, the staffing level and technical capacity for this action is moderate and high external support from management bodies is needed (ICMBIO, 2022).
The management effectiveness assessment of Emas National Park highlights “Environmental Compensation and Financial Sustainability” as one of its key processes. However, it is at a moderate level of consolidation, indicating the need for strengthening in terms of a designated focal point, an established routine, or a valid, assessed, and monitored instrument (ICMBIO, 2023e).
Staff capacity, training and development
Some Concern
The most recent periodic report points to deficiencies in capacity and resources and indicates that recruitment efforts are underway for qualified public personnel and assignment from other agencies and hiring outsourced collaborators to fill gaps (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
Education and interpretation programmes
Mostly Effective
The Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park has an environmental education planning for the surrounding areas that aims to raise environmental awareness to minimize threats and impacts on the protected area. It includes actions such as “Educating for Conservation”, focused on local schools to foster a closer connection with the park, and “Participation in Local Events”, engaging in community events to raise awareness about conservation (ICMBIO, 2021). Nevertheless, the 2020 management effectiveness assessment found that technical capacity for this implementation is low, and significant external support is needed, thus this action was partially carried out (ICMBIO, 2022). Also, the management plan acknowledged the need of developing an environmental interpretation plan to expand knowledge and recognition of the historical and cultural value of the territory where the Park is located, as well as to gather archaeological information within this protected area (ICMBIO, 2021).
Regarding Emas National Park, one of the management actions was “Elaborate an environmental education program/plan”. The action was carried out despite moderate financial resources (ICMBIO, 2023e). According to the State Party, efforts are underway to expand the educational programmes (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
Tourism and visitation management
Mostly Effective
Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park (CdVNP) is one of the main federal conservation units (UCs) visited in Brazil, experiencing an increase of visitors. At the moment, CdVNP is managed under concession by Sociparque consortium. The concession agreement will be for 20 years and provides for investments of R$ 2.5 million to improve the tourist infrastructure, including the renovation of the Visitors Center, the renovation of a road that gives access to the trails and attractions of the place, improvement of the infrastructure in the area reserved for camping, provision of internal transport and installation of a space for catering (Socicam, 2019).
Presently, CdVNP includes five attractions open to visitors, with one offering an overnight stay, and a trail system. Some attractions have a carrying capacity limit: the Saltos e Corredeiras (250 people per day), the “Canions e Cariocas” (200 people per day), and the “Seriema trail” (30 people per day). According to the inventory of potential activities, 27 attractions were identified, with an offer of 61 existing activities and another 55 potential activities to be implanted (Andrade, 2018). In 2020, Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park inaugurated two new trails: the "São Jorge - Capela" Crossing and the Pouso Alto Visitor Area. Developed over two years in line with the park’s Management Plan, the 25km São Jorge - Capela trail, which follows part of a historic route connecting São Jorge to the Capela community and marks the first official park access from Cavalcante (GO), includes a new camping area, enhancing regional tourism. As part of the 490 km Caminho dos Veadeiros hiking route, it is now the longest trail within the park, offering overnight stays in the site. This initiative was made possible through partnerships with local authorities, environmental organizations, firefighters, and community members (ICMBIO, 2022b). By February 2025, the National Network of Long-Distance Trails and Connectivity (RedeTrilhas), which connects various nature trails across Brazil, officially recognized the Caminho dos Veadeiros in as part of the system, developed by the Ministries of Tourism, Environment and Climate Change, the ICMBIO, and volunteers. RedeTrilhas fosters the expansion of economic activities, enhancing tourism experiences for visitors while creating additional livelihood opportunities for local communities engaged in tourism services (Ministério do Turismo, 2025). The management effectiveness assessment suggests that the key process “Public use and tourism” is totally consolidated (ICMBIO, 2022a).

The Emas National Park offers characteristic landscapes and the observation of animals typical of the Cerrado (giant anteater, wild dog, rhea, tapir, deer and others). It includes 354 km of trails; some could be self-guided and others require the presence of accredited guides. With the support of third parties, some tours are offered: boat including diving activities; cross buoy, navigating the stretch of the Formoso river rapids; cycling and the safari car ride, with a maximum capacity of 20 people for driving within the park. Since November 2017, the ENP started a volunteer program, to contribute to the Park's activities such as mapping of natural fire areas, research on the fauna management of the jawed populations, planting of seedlings and reforestation, elaboration of a new signage project and park signs to be implemented are carried out (ICMBio, 2020e). The park built a new support facility at Espaço Formoso, located near the river of the same name that runs through the area, making it more comfortable and safer for visitors (ICMBIO, 2023d). According to the latest periodic report the implementation of the concession at Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park is in progress and an increase in the visitation structure of the Emas National Park is planned (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
Sustainable use
Data Deficient
In Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, livestock is permitted for communities that resided there before the park's creation (ICMBio, 2020a). However, there is insufficient information to determine whether this is sustainable in practice.
Monitoring
Some Concern
Monitoring in federal conservation units is coordinated by the ICMBio through the “Monitora Program -National Biodiversity Monitoring Program” and one of its objectives is to generate qualified information for the ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of federal conservation units (UCs) and the National System of Conservation Units in meeting their biodiversity conservation objectives. The Monitora Program was formalized in 2017, and both CdVNP and ENP have ongoing monitoring (ICMBio, 2018b).
“Biodiverity monitoring” is one of the key processes of Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks. By 2022 in CdVNP this process was in a moderate state of consolidation. The staffing level, equipment and financial resources are very low, the technical capacity is moderate as well as the external support needed (ICMBIO, 2022a). Whereas, in ENP the process was highly consolidated, and the staffing level, equipment and financial resources are moderate as well as the external support needed (ICMBIO, 2023e). Further efforts are underway to better utilise monitoring data to improve management (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
Regionally, the National Center for Biodiversity Assessment and Cerrado Research and Conservation (CBC) works towards the production of technical and scientific knowledge to support conservation and sustainable use actions in the Cerrado biome, including in situ monitoring of biodiversity in savanna environments and the restoration and recovery of degraded environments, with the data systematized in the ICMBio Dynamic Information Panel (ICMBio, 2020f). This panel is a national platform for the information on federal protected areas provided by the 14 ICMBio research centers and offering information about the management of UCs, endangered species, public use and tourism, people management, protection and inspection of UCs, fauna and flora, socio-environmental actions and other (ICMBio, 2020f).
About fire monitoring, the portal Queimadas is continuously monitoring outbreaks of wildfires and forest fires detected by satellites, calculating and predicting vegetation fire risk, and registering updated information per biome and state, even with the chance to focus on protected areas (INPE, 2020). Monitoring of the natural regeneration in sensitive environments after fire was carried out in CdVNP with a team of researchers from the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), University of Brasília (UnB) and the University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), (UNESCO, 2019). Specific efforts are also recognized, such as some platforms of community monitoring registered data for species, as is the case of EcoRregistros, observations in the ENP related to the Venado de las Pampas (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) has been recorded (EcoRegistros, 2020).
Research
Mostly Effective
“Research” is one of the key processes and management actions of Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks. By 2022 in CdVNP the staffing level, technical capacity and financial resources were sufficient, while equipment availability was moderate, and the external support was needed for this aspect (ICMBIO, 2022a). Whereas, in ENP the process was highly consolidated, and the staffing level, equipment and financial resources are moderate as well as the external support needed for effective research (ICMBIO, 2023e). Efforts are underway to establish research partnerships with higher education institutions geared towards management needs and improving understanding of the OUV (State Party of Brazil, 2023).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Some Concern
While the current and potential threats affecting the Cerrado Protected Areas originate mostly outside the site (cattle ranching and agriculture, biological isolation, increasing dam construction, invasive species and climate change), its mitigation and control is essentially beyond the mandate and capacity of the ICMBio. Nonetheless, it is more likely for the Chapada dos Veadeiros NP, being part of the Pouso Alto Environmental Protection Area and having several private reserves in the surroundings, to face these growing threats as a conservation block. To achieve this, it is necessary to “ensure that the management of these different conservation units is harmonized and focused on the protection of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, through the development of an overarching Management Plan or other appropriate mechanisms”, as recommended by the World Heritage Committee in 2019 (UNESCO, 2019). This is unfortunately not possible for the Emas NP, unless connectivity processes with other conservation areas are strengthened.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Some Concern
The management effectiveness assessments of Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks reveal differing levels of effectiveness in addressing internal and external threats. Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, with a 2022 effectiveness index of 59%, is considered moderately effective, meeting only the minimum requirements for conservation and public policies. While the Park benefits from high availability of inputs (86%) and demonstrates strong conservation results (80%), it struggles with controlling prohibited uses, as indicated by its low Context score (23.6%). In contrast, Emas National Park, with a 2023 effectiveness index of 71.5%, is classified as effective, meaning its conservation objectives are being met. The Park excels in managing permitted uses (86%) and maintaining a strong conservation status (75%), despite facing significant pressures. However, the lack of an up-to-date management plan presents a challenge for long-term strategic planning. While both parks demonstrate resilience in conserving biodiversity, persistent threats such as wildfires and land use pressures require ongoing improvements in governance and enforcement.
Management effectiveness varies between the two protected areas. While Emas National Park's management has been consistently classified as "effective" in management effectiveness evaluations, Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park remains "moderately effective", meeting only the minimum requirements for conservation and public policies.
Conservation challenges persist, despite the overall effectiveness in aspects such as stakeholder and rightsholder involvement in decision-making processes, governance arrangements, education and interpretation programs, tourism and visitation management, and research. The weaker management aspects relate to a lack of qualified personnel, lack of conservation status of the surrounding landscape and a prioritisation of agriculture compared to conservation, as demonstrated by the proposed legislative decree 338/2021, which intends to reduce the National Park’s conservation area by up to 73%. Even though the decision is still under discussion, the debate itself is already causing harm, by encouraging land invasion. Additionally, challenges remain regarding the completion of the land regularization process in Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park and ensuring the long-term implementation of the Integrated Fire Management program.

Key habitats and species that characterize the Cerrado Ecoregion

Low Concern
Trend
Stable
Continuous intensive agriculture and cattle ranching around the Cerrado Protected Areas keep driving pressure on key habitats and species conservation. Because of the ecosystem fragmentation, the conservation units may not be able to guarantee the maintenance or representativeness of some key species (Latrubesse et al., 2019). In addition, the reduced size of the national parks due to fragmentation, is not enough for the conservation of different species. For example, closed reserves of the size of Emas National Park do not appear to be large enough to maintain long-term viable jaguar populations without any net immigration (Finnegan et al., 2019). Fire frequency and severity, especially generated by human activity, keep influencing the current composition of the landscape and biodiversity, but without a drastically reducing of the unique value of the biodiversity (IUCN, 2013). This is supported by observations of natural regeneration of the vegetation in affected areas after the 2017 fires (UNESCO, 2019), and the expansion of the prescribed burn areas by 63% compared to 2022, as an Integrated Fire Management measure in Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park. By starting prescribed burns earlier and increasing their volume, fire managers created extensive firebreaks that helped control all incidents within the park. The integration of helicopters and airplanes further improved efficiency by enabling access to remote areas (ICMBIO, 2023a, 2023b, 2024).

Key role in maintaining the biodiversity of the Cerrado Ecoregion

Low Concern
Trend
Stable
Considering that in 2017 the National Park was expanded from 65,514 to 240,611 ha, the creation of the Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station with an area of 6,811 ha and the existence of the Natural Heritage Private Reserves, the level of protection of the site recognized as a World Heritage Site has been re-established (State of Party, 2019a). Regarding CdVNP, management effectiveness raises concern about the biodiversity value “preservation of natural ecosystems of great ecological relevance and scenic beauty”, which is in state of intervention, due mainly to recurring anthropic fires in different locations of the NP (ICMBio, 2020a). Minor threats from invasive exotic species are recognized, which affect native species of Cerrado´s biome (Lessaa et al., 2016; CEPF, 2017; Cazetta and Zenni, 2019). The development and implementation of the Integrated Fire Management Plan in 2022 and the Plan for Prevention, Control, and Monitoring of Invasive Alien Fauna (2023) of the Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park play a crucial role in maintaining the biodiversity of the Cerrado Ecoregion by addressing two of the most significant threats to this ecosystem: wildfires and exotic species invasions.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Stable
Despite several current and potential threats related to increasing grassland fires and effects of climate change, increasing tourism and recreational activities, and the presence of invasive alien species in the Cerrado Protected Areas, the two site components and their surrounding areas remain in an good state of conservation, both from the point of view of species, ecosystems and ecological processes. Observations of natural regeneration after the 2017 fires and the expansion of prescribed burns as part of the Integrated Fire Management strategy in Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park demonstrate resilience.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
High Concern
Deteriorating
With the expansion of CdVNP and strengthening of Heritage Private Reserves, connectivity of CdVNPR with surrounding areas improved, however, fragmentation and biological isolation remains as a major potential threat for the Emas National Park, which is too small to provide the full range of habitats needed to conserve a wide ranging species, such as top predators and some bird species. There is an increasing concern regarding water supply and the potential cumulative impacts of hydroelectric development in the region (Timpe and Kaplan, 2017). Woody encroachment (Honda and Durigan, 2016) combined with effects of climate change expressed in excessive rains and extreme droughts (IANAS, 2019), could have a potentially drastic effect on the balance of the hydrological regime of the region.

Additional information

Water provision (importance for water quantity and quality)
The region of the Brazilian Central Plateau, where the Cerrado Biome is located, is an important place for water production and distribution throughout Brazil. Eight of the twelve Brazilian hydrographic regions receive water from this Biome contributing to more than 90% of the discharge of the São Francisco River, 50% of the Paraná River, and 70% of the Tocantins River. Cerrado is as a result one of the main contributors to the hydropower sector and responsible for more than 50% of the Brazilian hydroelectricity production and has an outstanding relevance in the national agricultural scenery (Lima et al., 2011).
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Climate change
Trend - Increasing
Pollution
Trend - Increasing
Overexploitation
Trend - Increasing
Habitat change
Trend - Increasing
Outdoor recreation and tourism,
Natural beauty and scenery
Geological landscapes and waterfalls with rivers and the quartz crystals stand out as tourism attractions of the Cerrado Protected Areas. Involving activities for spiritual tourism and nature tourism, both NPs offer opportunities for tourists to get to know unique and extraordinary ecosystems, especially within CdVNP, which is one of the main NP visited in the country.
 
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Pollution
Impact level - Low
Trend - Increasing
Importance for research
Chapada de Nova Roma Ecological Station was created in 2017, covers an area of 6,811 ha and is surrounded by the expanded CdVNP. It is an integral protection conservation unit, with objective of preserving ecosystems and biodiversity, as well as carrying out scientific research. It has its own approved Management Plan and advisory council (UNESCO, 2019; Governo do Estado De Goiás, 2020)
It is hard to separate the benefits of the Cerrado Protected Areas from that of the larger Cerrado Ecoregion. Water production is the main environmental service provided as eight of the twelve Brazilian hydrographic regions receive water from this biome. Due to its unique scenic beauty, with geological landscapes, waterfalls with rivers and the quartz crystals the property is an important tourist attraction in the region, providing not only benefits as to health and recreation, but also contributing to the local economy of the area's population.
It is difficult to establish the level of impact of factors negatively affecting the provision of benefits, even knowing that they are present within and in the surroundings of the property (i.e. and use change, pollution, over exploitation, climate change and invasive species). Nonetheless, it is likely that these factors continue to increase over time, due to economic and global trends in which the region is placed.
Organization Brief description of Active Projects Website
1 United Nations Environment Program -UNEP- / Ministry of Environment Brazil / FUNATURA Objective: to scale up sustainable landscape management and contribute to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision in private areas in Brazil. The first component is implementing pilot areas located in the biogeographical regions of Atlantic Forest and Cerrado, where the activities that will be developed are related to reducing degree of fragmentation in production landscapes, increasing habitat availability for endangered species, and developing incentives schemes for conservation. The Pouso Alto Environmental Protection Area is one of the pilot areas.
https://www.iis-rio.org/en/projects/gef-private-areas/
2 FUNATURA / Petrobras The project “Where the Jaguar Drinks Water: Communities and Well-Being”, carried out by the Pró-Natureza Foundation (Funatura) in partnership with Petrobras, through the Petrobras Socio-Environmental Program, seeks to protect the Cerrado and strengthen local communities. The initiative combats deforestation, promotes water security and restores natural areas, ensuring a more sustainable future for biodiversity and people.
https://funatura.org.br/projeto/onde-a-onca-bebe-agua-comunidades-e-bem-viver/
3 FUNATURA / CEPF The project aims to improve the management of Private Natural Heritage Reserves (RPPNs) in Chapada dos Veadeiros, promoting the integration of owners and the implementation of structured and efficient governance. To this end, the creation of the Chapada dos Veadeiros RPPN Owners Network will be encouraged, an innovative initiative aimed at the collaborative construction of a long-term strategic vision for the RPPNs.
https://funatura.org.br/projeto/fortalecimento-das-reservas-particulares-do-patrimonio-natural-da-chapada-dos-veadeiros-go/

References

References
1
Alho, C.J.R., Mamede, S.B., Benites, M, Andrade, B.S. and Sepúlveda, J.J.O. (2019). Threats to the biodiversity of the Brazilian Pantanal due to land use and occupation. Ambiente & Sociedade, 22, pp.1-22.
2
Amoury, J. (2021). Incêndio no Parque Nacional das Emas é controlado após atingir quase 28 mil hectares, diz director. [Online] Available at: https://g1.globo.com/go/goias/noticia/2021/07/13/incendio-n… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
3
Andrade, T.C. (2018). Rol de oportunidades de visitação em áreas protegidas: um estudo de caso no Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso, Especialização latu sensu em Sociobiodiversidade e Sustentabilidade do Cerrado. Universidade de Brasília. [online] Available at: https://bdm.unb.br/bitstream/10483/21537/1/2018_ThamyrisCar… (Accessed 18 July 2020)
4
Benites, M. and Mamede, S. (2008). Mamíferos e aves como instrumentos de educação e conservação ambiental em corredores de biodiversidade do Cerrado, Brasil. Mastozoología neotropical, 15(2), pp. 261-271 [online] Available at: https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=b072e2d7-1dc9-41b8… (Accessed 18 July 2020)
5
BidLife International. IUCN Red List for Birds - Species factsheet: Mergus octosetaceus. Available at http://www.birdlife.org, [Accessed 10 March 2021]
6
Cardim, M.E . (2022). Chapada dos Veadeiros está mais ameaçada pela grilagem de terra. [Online] Available at: https://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/cidades-df/2022/04/50… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
7
Cazetta, A.L. and Zenni, R. (2019). Pine invasion decreases density and changes native tree communities in woodland Cerrado, Plant Ecology & Diversity, 13(1), pp. 85-91.
8
Conservação Internacional Brasil (CI). (2007). Relatório de Atividades 2006 e 2007 [online] Available at: https://www.conservation.org/docs/default-source/brasil/rel… (Accessed 23 July 2020)
9
Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) and International Institute of Education of Brazil (IEB). (n.d). Avoiding the extinction of the Brazilian Merganser on the Veadeiros-Pouso Alto-Kalungas Corridor, Chapada dos Veadeiros, Brazil [online] Available at: http://cepfcerrado.iieb.org.br/en/projetos/evitando-extinca… (Accessed 24 July 2020)
10
Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). (2017). Ecosystem Profile Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot [online] Available at: https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/files/cerrado-ecosystem-… (Accessed 20 July 2020)
11
Disconzi, et al. (2024). Mapeamento e Distribuição do Pato-mergulhão Mergus octosetaceus (Aves:Anseriformes) na Região da Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás. Fronteira: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science. 13. p130-149.
12
Domiciano, S., de Oliveira, C. and lvanilton, J. (2012). Cartografia dos impactos ambientais no Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros (GO). Revista de Geografia da UFC, 11(25), pp. 179-199 [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272710859_CARTOGRA… (Accessed 15 July 2020)
13
Durigan, G. and Ratter, A. (2015). The need for a consistent fire policy for Cerrado conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(1), pp. 11-15 [online] Available at: https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.111… (Accessed 17 July 2020)
14
EcoRegistros. (2020). Venado de las Pampas (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) - Ficha de la especie [online] Available at:  http://www.ecoregistros.org (Accessed 24 July 2020)
15
FUNBIO. (2018a). 2ª FASE DO CAR: MOSAICO VEADEIROS-PARANÃ [online] Available at: https://www.funbio.org.br/programas_e_projetos/acordo-bilat… (Accessed 29 July 2020)
16
FUNBIO. (2018b). Programas e Projetos - Tropical Forest Conservation Act – TFCA - Manejo Integrado de Fogo na Chapada. [online] Available at: https://www.funbio.org.br/programas_e_projetos/acordo-bilat… (Accessed 29 July 2020).
17
Ferreguetti, Á. C., Lessa, I. C. M., Vieira, E. M., Cunha, A. A. and Bergallo, H. G. (2019). Medium-and large-sized mammal composition in the Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park and adjacent areas, state of Goiás, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos De Zoologia, 59, e20195942.
18
Fidelis, A., Alvarado, S., Barradas, A. and Pivello, V. (2018). The Year 2017: Megafires and Management in the Cerrado. Fire, 1(3), 49.
19
França, S. and Martins, S. (2020). A dupla face dos polígonos que configuram, ambiental e historicamente, a microrregião da chapada dos veadeiros. Finisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, (113), 175-194 [online] Available at:  http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/fin/n113/n113a09.pdf (Accessed 27 July 2020)
20
GardaWorld. (2019). Brazil: Forest fire in Chapada Dos Veadeiros affects over 6000 hectares as of September 30, GardaWorld, 1 October  [online] Available at: https://www.garda.com/crisis24/news-alerts/272341/brazil-fo… (Accesesed 14 July 2020).
21
Governo do Estado De Goiás. (2017). Plano de Desenvolvimento Integrado do Turismo Sustentável (PDITS) – Polo da Chapada dos Veadeiros. [online] Available at: http://www.turismo.gov.br/sites/default/turismo/DPROD/PDITS… (Accessed 18 July 2020)
22
Governo do Estado De Goiás. (2020). Estação Ecológica da Chapada de Nova Roma - ESEC CNR [online] Available at: https://www.meioambiente.go.gov.br/planos-e-projetos/agenda… (Accessed 18 July 2020)
23
Governo do Estado de Goiás (2024). Relatório de incêndios florestais em Goiás – 2024. [Online] Available at: https://goias.gov.br/meioambiente/wp-content/uploads/sites/… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
24
Guimarães Silva, R., Zenni, R., Possato Rosse, V., Bastos, L. and Berg, E. (2020). Landscape-level determinants of the spread and impact of invasive grasses in protected areas. Biological Invasions [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342702175_Landscap…  (Accessed 15 July 2020)
25
Hofmann, G. S. (2024). Mudanças climáticas no cerrado brasileiro: suas origens e impactos para biodiversidade. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. [Online] Available at: https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/281906 [Accessed 30 January 2025].
26
Honda, E. and Durigan, G. (2016). Woody encroachment and its consequences on hydrological processes in the savannah. The Royal Society, 37(1).
27
ICMBio. (2018a). Oficina apresenta proposta do Mosaico Veadeiros-Paranã [online] Available at: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/ultimas-noticias/20-geral/… (Accessed 28 July 2020)
28
ICMBio. (2018b). Estratégia do Programa Nacional de Monitoramento da Biodiversidade PROGRAMA MONITORA. Estrutura, articulações, perspectivas [online] Available at: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/o-que-fazem… (Accessed 24 July 2020).
29
ICMBio. (2020a). SAMGe Sistema de Análise e Monitoramento de Gestão [online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/ (Accessed 17 July 2020)
30
ICMBio. (2020b). Coordenações Regionais [online] Available at: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/ondeestamos (Accessed 17 July 2020)
31
ICMBio. (2020c). Programa do Voluntariado do ICMBio [online] Available at: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/sejaumvoluntario (Accessed 22 July 2020)
32
ICMBio. (2020d). Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros [online] Available at: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/parnachapadadosveadeiros/quem-som… (Accessed 22 July 2020)
33
ICMBio. (2020e). Unidades Abertas A Visitação Parque Nacional das Emas [online] https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/visitacao1/unidades-aberta… (Accessed 22 July 2020)
34
ICMBio. (2020f). Painel Dinâmico de Informações do ICMBio [online] Available at: http://qv.icmbio.gov.br/QvAJAXZfc/opendoc2.htm?document=pai… (Accessed 31 July 2020)
35
IUCN (2001). World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation, Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2001, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. [online] Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/151584 [Accessed November 2020].
36
IUCN (2013). Report on the Reactive Monitoring Mission to Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil), March, 2013. [online] Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp.1-40. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/123330 [Accessed November 2020].
37
IUCN (2019). World Heritage Minor Boundary Modification Proposal – IUCN Technical Evaluation, Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2019, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. WHC/19/43.COM/INF.8B2 ADD. [online] Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp.17-28. Available at: < < https://whc.unesco.org/document/172322>; [Accessed August 2020].
38
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2021). PLANO DE MANEJO DO PARQUE NACIONAL DA CHAPADA DOS VEADEIROS. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/uni… [Accessed 18 December 2024].
39
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2022a). Painel de Resultados por Unidade de Conservação. PARNA DA CHAPADA DOS VEADEIROS. [Online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/Uc/664 [Accessed 20 February 2025].
40
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2022b). Chapada dos Veadeiros inaugura nuevos atractivos. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
41
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023a). Chapada dos Veadeiros inicia temporada de prevenção a incêndios florestais. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
42
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023b). Helicópteros apoiam queimas prescritas. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
43
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023c). Unidades de conservação entram em temporada de prevenção a incendios. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 30 January 2025].
44
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023d). Novas instalações oferecem mais conforto aos visitantes do Parque Nacional das Emas. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 20 February].
45
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2023e). Painel de Resultados por Unidade de Conservação. PARNA DAS EMAS [Online] Available at: http://samge.icmbio.gov.br/Uc/680 [Accessed 20 February 2025].
46
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (2024). Unidades de conservação fecham 2023 com quase 270 mil hectares em áreas manejadas para prevenção de incendios. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ultimas-n… [Accessed 30 January 2025]
47
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIo). (2015). Portaria No. 01, de 22 de junho de 2015. Renova a Portaria e modifica a composição do Conselho Consultivo do Parque Nacional das Emas, no estado de Goiás [online] Available at: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/DCOM_portar… (Accessed 22 July 2020)
48
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (n.d.a). Parna da Chapada dos Veadeiros. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/uni… [Accessed 18 February 2025].
49
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (n.d.b). Parna das Emas. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/uni… [Accessed 18 February 2025].
50
Instituto Chico Mendes para Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio). PAN Plano de Ação Nacional para Conservação das Espécies Ameaçadas - Pato-mergulhão (2º ciclo de gestão). Sumário Executivo. 2020
51
Instituto Chico Méndes de Conservacão da Biodiviersidade, 2009. Plano de Manejo Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros Resumo Executivo.
52
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE). (2020). Programa Queimadas [online] Available at: http://queimadas.dgi.inpe.br/queimadas/portal/informacoes/a… (Accessed 15 July 2020).
53
Latrubesse, E. M., Arima, E., Ferreira, M. E., Nogueira, S. H., Wittmann, F., Dias, M. S., ... and Bayer, M. (2019). Fostering water resource governance and conservation in the Brazilian Cerrado biome. Conservation Science and Practice, 1(9), e77.
54
Lessaa, I., Correa, T., de Godoy, H., Cunhaa, A. and Vieirad, E. (2016). Domestic dogs in protected areas: a threat to Brazilian mammals?. Natureza & Conservação,1 4, pp. 46–56.
55
Lima, J., Silva, E., Oliveira-Filho, E., Martins, E., Reatto, A., Bufon, B. (2011). The relevance of the Cerrado’s water resources to the Brazilian development. Proceedings of the XIVth IWRA World Water Congress. IWRA, Montpellier.
56
MapBiomas (2025). Área queimada no Brasil cresce 79% em 2024 e supera os 30 milhões de hectares. [Online] Available at: https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/2025/01/22/area-queimada-no-br… [Accessed 3 February 2025].
57
Menegassi, D. (2017). Com a palavra: Fernando Tatagiba, gestor do Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros (parte 2). Wikiparques [online] Available at: https://www.wikiparques.org/com-a-palavra-fernando-tatagiba… (Accessed 26 July 2020)
58
Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade and Parque Nacional Da Chapada Dos Veadeiros (2022). PLANO DE MANEJO INTEGRADO DO FOGO - Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/public… [Accessed 20 February 2025].
59
Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (n.d(a)). Relatório Parametrizado - Unidade de Conservação: Chapado dos Vadeiros NP [online] Available at: http://sistemas.mma.gov.br/cnuc/index.php?ido=relatoriopara… (Accessed 22 July  2020)
60
Ministério do Turismo (2022). Meio milhão de visitas registradas nos parques naturais que estão no 2º maior bioma da América do Sul. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/turismo/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/meio-mil… [Accessed 3 February 2025].
61
Ministério do Turismo (2025). Caminho dos Veadeiros passa integrar oficialmente a Rede Nacional de Trilhas de Longo Curso. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.br/turismo/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/caminho-… [Accessed 24 February 2025].
62
Observatório do Turismo Estado de Goiás (2020). Boletim de dados do tuismo em Goiás 2020. [Online] Available at: https://goias.gov.br/turismo/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/202… [Accessed 3 February 2025].
63
Observatório do Turismo Estado de Goiás (n.d.). Perfil do visitante do Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros 2017/2018/2019. [Online] Available at: https://goias.gov.br/turismo/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/202… [Accessed 3 February 2025].
64
Pukensis Tubelis, Dárius. 2010. When a large reserve is not large enough to protect part of a population: Blue-and-yellow Macaws (Area ararauna) in Central Brazil. Biotemas 23(3). September, 2010.
65
Socicam. (2019). Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros passa a ser administrado pela Socicam [online] https://www.socicam.com.br/2019/04/01/parque-nacional-da-ch… (Accessed 26 July 2020).
66
Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência (SBPC) (2024). O Cerrado e as mudanças climáticas. [Online] Available at: https://portal.sbpcnet.org.br/noticias/o-cerrado-e-as-mudan… [Accessed 3 February 2025].
67
Sociparques. (2020). Parque Nacional da Chapa dos Veadeiros [online] Available at:  https://sociparques.com.br/fale-conosco/ (Accessed 26 July 2020)
68
State Party of Brazil (2022). 2020 Report on the State of Conservation Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil) (N1035). Ministry of the Environment of Brazil and Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio). [Online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/186316 [Accessed 20 December 2024].
69
State Party of Brazil (2023). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1035/documents/
70
State Party of Brazil. (2017). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil) [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3620 ; (Accessed 22 July 2020).
71
State Party of Brazil. (2019a). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil). [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1035/documents/ (Accessed 20 July 2020).
72
State Party of Brazil. (2019b). Minor modifications proposal to the boundaries of Cerrado Protected Areas World Heritage: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks State. Report related to Decision WHC/19/43.COM/8B.42. Baku, Azerbaijan: State Party of Brazil.
73
Timpe, K. and Kaplan, D. (2017). The changing hydrology of a dammed Amazon. Science advances, 3(11).
74
UNESCO (2012). Report on the State of Conservation of Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks, Brazil. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, pp.2. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/96 (Accessed November 2020)
75
UNESCO (2019). Report on the State of Conservation of Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks, Brazil. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, pp.2. Available at: < https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3911>; (Accessed 15 July 2020)
76
World Heritage Committee (2012). Decision 36 COM 7B.30. Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil). In: Report of decisions of the 36th session of the World Heritage Committee (Saint Petersburg, 2012). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/4679 [Accessed November 2020].
 
77
World Heritage Committee (2015). Decision: 39 COM 8E Adoption of Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value. In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th Session (Bonn, 2015). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: <https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6407>; [Accessed August 2020].
78
World Heritage Committee (2019). Decision 43 COM 8B.42. Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks (Brazil). In: Report of decisions of the 43rd session of the World Heritage Committee (Baku, 2019). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, p.106. Available at: < https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/7405 > [Accessed August 2020].
79
brCarbon (n.d.). Projeto de Carbono Corredor de Biodiversidade Emas-Taquari. [Online] Available at: https://brcarbon.com.br/emas-taquari/ [Accessed 20 February 2025].

Indigenous Heritage values

Would you like to share feedback to support the accuracy of information for this site? If so, send your comments below.

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.