El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve
The 714,566 hectare site comprises two distinct parts: the dormant volcanic Pinacate Shield of black and red lava flows and desert pavements to the east, and, in the west, the Gran Altar Desert with its ever changing and varied sand dunes that can reach a height of 200 metres. This landscape of dramatic contrast notably features linear, star and dome dunes as well as several arid granite massifs, some as high as 650 metres. The dunes emerge like islands from the sea of sand and harbour distinct and highly diverse plant and wildlife communities, including endemic freshwater fish species and the endemic Sonoran Pronghorn, which is only to be found in northwestern Sonora and in southwestern Arizona (USA). Ten enormous, deep and almost perfectly circular craters, believed to have been formed by a combination of eruptions and collapses, also contribute to the dramatic beauty of the site whose exceptional combination of features are of great scientific interest. The site is also a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve.
© UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Current state and trend of VALUES
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
Extraordinary landscape beauty
Extraordinary volcanic and geological features
Scientific importance of volcanic and geological features
Rare, endangered and endemic species of flora and fauna
Endemics include two arenicolous lizards, the flat-tail horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii) and the Yuma fringe-toed lizard (Uma rufopunctata), both considered as Near Threatened (IUCN) (Bezy et al., 2017); a local endemic plant restricted to a small part of the volcanic shield and several subspecies of plants endemics of the dunes of the Gran Desierto. Endemics include two freshwater fish species. There is a population of the endemic Sonoyta mud turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense longifemorale) which have recently declined markedly and should be closely monitored. The many other noteworthy species include the endangered subspecies of the Sonoran Pronghorn (Antilocarpa sonorensis), the Mexican subspecies of the bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) subjected to special protection, the Near Threatened lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae) and the endemic (listed as Vulnerable) fish-eating bat (Myotis vivesi).
Scientific importance (desert ecology and biology)
Assessment information
Although the border wall is located outside the formal boundaries of the World Heritage property, its effects on the site’s values are direct. The physical and road infrastructure associated with the wall—including metal fences, parallel roads, and barbed wire—disrupts key ecological processes by blocking the movement of wide-ranging species such as the Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americana sonoriensis) and the desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana), affecting their access to critical feeding, breeding, and genetic dispersal areas within the site. This type of impact represents a direct alteration of the ecological functionality of the transboundary ecosystem. Surface runoff has also been affected due to topographic modifications caused by the construction. Despite binational monitoring and conservation efforts—such as the Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Plan and studies promoted by the USGS—ecological connectivity between the site and the protected area of southern Arizona remains seriously compromised. An urgent mitigation strategy based on effective binational cooperation and the restoration of wildlife corridors is needed to restore the ecological connectivity across the transboundary landscape (UNESCO, 2024). Binational collaboration is ongoing: The Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Plan has been prepared and includes a captive breeding programme, water and forage supply improvement project, pronghorn translocation programme, census and aerial monitoring; In addition, the National Park Service has initiated a study to be conducted by scientists from the US Geological Survey and the University of Arizona to assess the impacts of the US-Mexico border barrier on mammal communities in the Sonoran Desert, with initial results expected by 2025 and a final report in early 2026 (UNESCO, 2024; State Party of Mexico, 2025).
Although there is a regulatory framework governing mineral extraction in the state of Sonora, it is unclear whether these instruments adequately consider the indirect impacts on the World Heritage property. In this regard, it is necessary to strengthen environmental monitoring and establish inter-institutional coordination to assess and mitigate potential cumulative effects on the site's values (State Party of Mexico, 2023b).
One of the most significant effects has been habitat fragmentation caused by roadside fencing, which is legally required along many sections. This fencing disrupts ecological connectivity, particularly for species such as the Sonoran pronghorn, whose presence declines sharply in areas near high-traffic roads (Grageda García, 2023).
Although the current extent of these threats within the property is considered scattered (5–15%), their impact on endangered species and on the integrity of the landscape is considerable. Therefore, it is necessary to implement corrective measures such as wildlife crossings on Highways Mexico 2 and 8, as well as regional connectivity strategies to mitigate the barrier effect caused by infrastructure, in conjunction with that of the border wall (IUCN, 2013; Castillo-Sánchez, 1999). Avoiding the development of new highways within the pronghorn range should be considered.
The Agua Dulce Ramsar site, an integral part of the property, is particularly vulnerable as it depends on the availability of both surface water (Sonoyta River) and groundwater. Excessive extraction and agricultural and industrial pollution—on both the Mexican and U.S. sides—directly affect riparian habitats, aquatic species, and landscape integrity (State Party of Mexico, 2023b; IUCN, 2013). Pollution of the Sonoyta River—resulting from agricultural runoff in Arizona and wastewater from the city of Sonoyta—has been a documented problem for decades and continues to this day. At the regional level, the transformation of the Colorado River system has drastically reduced the flow of water to the delta and the Gulf of California, altering fundamental ecological processes that sustain the functionality of the Altar Desert ecosystem. Although monitoring efforts have been initiated and a participatory water management strategy is being developed for the region, it is urgent to advance its effective implementation, prioritizing an integrated watershed approach and binational coordination to prevent cumulative and irreversible impacts on the property's Outstanding Universal Value.
– Vehicle traffic generating noise, solid waste, and wildlife roadkill.
– Off-road use of all-terrain vehicles, causing damage to vegetation, soil, and habitats.
– Illegal harvesting of flora and fauna by some visitors.
– Pressure on water resources due to demand from coastal tourism developments in adjacent areas.
– Incentives to expand road infrastructure, increasing the risk of habitat fragmentation and the introduction of invasive alien species.
Effective tourism management must take these potential risks into account, even if the current volume of visitors remains low. It is a priority to implement access control systems, ecological monitoring, environmental education, and inter-institutional coordination to prevent cumulative impacts on the site's Outstanding Universal Value (State Party of Mexico, 2023b).
However, the most critical long term management issues to address are potential problems derived from tourism-related water consumption (State Party of Mexico, 2023b; IUCN, 2013; Burquez y Martinez-Yrizar, 2006).
Climate change represents a significant potential threat, given the ecosystem's high dependency on specific climatic patterns. Changes in the availability of surface and groundwater could directly affect vegetation, wildlife habitats, scenic beauty, and the ecological dynamics of the site. Finally, the recent construction of the border wall has reduced the site’s ecological connectivity with other protected areas in the southwestern United States. This limits the ability of many species to respond to climate change and exacerbates the effects of future threats by restricting movement, genetic dispersal, and the natural recolonization of wildlife.
Fires profoundly alter the structure and composition of vegetation, causing the loss of endemic and threatened species and the progressive transformation of the desert landscape into grasslands dominated by invasive species. This process directly degrades the scenic beauty of the volcanic landscape, endanger species of high scientific value, and disrupts essential ecological processes. Although large areas of exotic grasses have not yet been identified within the property, the active promotion of these species in northern Mexico represents a latent threat. Therefore, a preventive program must be established, including early detection, control of invasive plant species, fire risk monitoring, and strategies for environmental education and institutional coordination.
In this context, it is recommended to maintain preventive monitoring of the advancement of mining concessions and extractive projects in the vicinity of the property, particularly those that may alter the landscape, affect shared aquifers, or interfere with the ecological connectivity of key species (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Currently, the El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve has an Advisory Council that includes representatives from federal and local governments, academic and research institutions, civil society organizations, local communities, ejidos, and members of the Tohono O’odham Indigenous people. The National Commission for Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) implements various subsidy programs to promote the participation of local communities in conservation, surveillance, and environmental monitoring activities (State Party of Mexico, 2020).
These mechanisms have fostered effective coordination and engagement of key stakeholders in the management, protection, and conservation of the property, strengthening recognition of territorial rights and shared responsibility in the management of the protected area (State Party of Mexico, 2023b). It is essential to maintain and strengthen these participatory platforms, ensure full representation of Indigenous peoples and local communities, and periodically evaluate the effectiveness of subsidy programs and dialogue mechanisms.
The World Heritage property fully coincides with the surface area of the ANP, providing it with a national legal framework that offers a solid foundation for its protection, conservation, and management (State Party of Mexico, 2023b).The national legislation applicable to Natural Protected Areas establishes clear provisions regarding land use, zoning, social participation, and mechanisms for environmental monitoring and enforcement. The Management Program of the Reserve defines the permitted uses within the core and buffer zones and includes the recognition of the property and management rights of ejidos and communities, which retain control over their lands in accordance with legal provisions. This national regulatory framework provides an adequate legal basis for fulfilling international commitments under the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. However, it is necessary to periodically assess its effective implementation and alignment with the criteria of the property’s Outstanding Universal Value.
It is recommended to improve coordination between CONANP, local governments, and ejidos, especially on matters such as land use, infrastructure management, and the control of unauthorized activities within the protected area (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
A major concern is the construction of the border wall between Mexico and the United States, which forms the northern boundary of the property. This infrastructure poses a significant barrier to ecological connectivity with protected areas on the U.S. side, including Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Barry M. Goldwater Range, all of which share key ecological values with the property—particularly in relation to migratory species such as the Sonoran pronghorn and desert bighorn sheep (World Heritage Committee, 2024). Despite the existence of functional operational relationships between institutions in both countries, there is a pressing need to substantially strengthen binational coordination to ensure the comprehensive conservation of the Sonoran Desert ecosystem (World Heritage Committee, 2024; IUCN, 2013). It is therefore strongly recommended to formally establish a Transboundary Protected Area linking the property with adjacent protected areas in the United States, to maintain and enhance ecological connectivity and the joint management of shared ecological processes.
However, it is important to clarify that not all parts of the property's buffer zone coincide with the buffer zones formally designated as part of the Natural Protected Area (ANP). While the ANP's buffer zones are legally supported under national legislation, other portions of the property's buffer zone that extend beyond the ANP are not subject to any legal environmental protection regime, posing a challenge for effective and integrated management (State Party of Mexico, 2023b).
As noted by the World Heritage Committee at the time of inscription, the exclusion of Bahía Adair from the property boundaries stands out, despite its status as a formally protected area and designated Ramsar site. Its inclusion would provide important complementary value by integrating marine-coastal ecosystems and more fully covering the region’s ecological and altitudinal gradient.
Likewise, greater protection of the desert ecosystem could be achieved by including the extensive dune fields to the west of the current boundary, extending up to the border with the Upper Gulf of California and Colorado River Delta Biosphere Reserve.
Currently, the management program of the Biosphere Reserve also functions as the management instrument for the Ramsar sites and the World Heritage property. However, this program was not specifically designed to address the attributes of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the World Heritage site and therefore does not explicitly incorporate strategies aimed at its comprehensive conservation under the criteria of the Convention.
Although there is no dedicated social participation mechanism specifically focused on the management of the property as a World Heritage site, the Biosphere Reserve has an Advisory Council that includes land users and rights holders, in accordance with CONANP’s internal regulations. This council provides a forum for consultation, coordination, and collective decision-making, and could be strengthened to better integrate the specific objectives of World Heritage conservation.
Nonetheless, binational cooperation persists in certain areas, such as the development of the Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Plan (State Party of Mexico, 2024).
The Committee also requested that both States Parties invite a joint Reactive Monitoring Mission to the property, but a formal joint invitation to the World Heritage Centre has not yet been issued. There are both formal and informal communications between the governments of Mexico and the United States—through Mexico’s National Commission for Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) and the U.S. National Park Service (NPS)—to agree on a tentative date for the mission. However, prevailing political and administrative conditions in the United States have prevented the visit from being finalized (State Party of Mexico, 2024).
Regarding the Puerto Peñasco Photovoltaic Plant project, as requested by the Committee, operational conditions were established, including mitigation measures to minimize negative impacts, as well as a monitoring and compliance program aimed at identifying and addressing any potential effects associated with the transmission line (State Party of Mexico, 2024).
Park management is struggling to have a strong voice in national public sectors as well, namely road construction. The compliance with requirements defined in Environmental Impact Assessments is not always secured despite frequent complaints on the part of park management, indicating a relatively weak position.
Extraordinary landscape beauty
Although there is no direct physical connection or adjacency to the property or its buffer zone, the presence of large open-pit mining projects in functional pronghorn habitats has the potential to indirectly affect the site through visual and topographic impacts and affecting the integrity of the desert and volcanic landscape characteristic of the property's surroundings. Associated with roads, one of the most significant effects has been habitat fragmentation caused by roadside fencing, which is legally required along many sections. This fencing disrupts ecological connectivity but also impacts the landscape beauty. In the buffer zone of the World Heritage property, there are extensive agricultural fields, primarily dedicated to asparagus cultivation, where controlled burning is used as a harvesting method. This practice produces large smoke plumes, visible from long distances, which can drift into the property depending on wind conditions, affecting both residents and visitors (State Party of Mexico, 2023b).
Extraordinary volcanic and geological features
Scientific importance of volcanic and geological features
Rare, endangered and endemic species of flora and fauna
Monitoring for populations of several other species of concern is ongoing, in particular for the flat-tail horned lizard, the Sonoyta pupfish, and Maguey bat (Leptonycteris yerbabuenae). The Yuma fringe-toed lizard, the Sonoyta mud turtle, the lesser long-nose and fish-eating bats, and Goode’s horned lizard, should be closely monitored.
Scientific importance (desert ecology and biology)
Collaboration between the Tohono O'odham and the administration of El Pinacate Biosphere Reserve, along with its Advisory Council, is essential to achieve a balance between environmental conservation and the cultural heritage of this native people. In this sense, there have been three meetings promoted by the state government, during the year 2023, to address various issues such as: 1. public consultation on the CFE electric transmission line project and the photovoltaic plant; 2. possible subsidy support for the Tohono Odham community; 3. sacred sites for the Tohono Odham nation (State Party of Mexico, 2024).
Additional information
| № | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Various academic and NGO partners | Various research projects, such as monitoring of various species. Scientific research is carried out within the reserve. |
.
|
| 2 | Center for Desert and Ocean Studies (CEDO) | This project is funded by the National Park Service's Southwest Frontier Resources Protection Program and is coordinated by the Center for Desert and Ocean Studies (CEDO by its acronym in Spanish). Its objective is to join the "Sonoran Desert Native Freshwater Fish Working Group," a binational group of protected area officials, professionals, researchers, and civil society organizations working to protect and conserve the native freshwater fish of the Sonoyta River, particularly the Sonoyta pupfish (Cyprinodon eremus) and the Mexican carp (Agosia chrysogaster). The group seeks to promote and work on actions to monitor the populations (size and genetic diversity), improve the design and infrastructure of the ponds and promote educational programs that connect the ponds at a binational level, considering the traditional knowledge of the Tohono O'odham Nation. | |
| 3 | University of Arizona, University of Sonora | This research project, promoted by the University of Arizona in collaboration with the University of Sonora, is aimed at understanding how the border wall affects mammal communities within the El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar BR Property. |
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
Armendáriz-Villegas, E.J., M.A. Covarrubias-García, E. Troyo-Dieguez, E. Lagunes, A. Arreola-Lizárraga, A. Nieto-Garibay, L.F. Beltrán-Morales & A. Ortega-Rubio. 2015. Mining and protected areas in Mexico: Geographical overlarps and environmental implications. Environmental Science & Policy 48:9-19.
|
| 2 |
Avila-Jiménez, D.Z. 2005. Changes in the Pinacate Reserve Ecosystems: Invasion of Non-Native Plants. Centro de Datos para la Conservación (CDC), Instituto del Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo Sustentable del Estado de Sonora (IMADES), Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-36.
|
| 3 |
Bezy, R.L., P.C. Rosen, T.R. Van Devender & E.F. Ederrson. 2017.Southern distributional limits of the Sonoran Desert herpetofauna along the mainland coast of northwestern Mexico. Mesomerican Herpetology 4: 137-167.
|
| 4 |
Brenner, J.C. & L.L. Kanda. 2013. Buffergrass (Pennisetum ciliare) invades land surrounding cultivated pastures in Sonora, Mexico. Invasive Plant Science and Management. DOI: 10.1614/IPSM-D-12-00047.1.
|
| 5 |
Brusca, R.C., J. Campoy Fabela, C. Castillo Sanchez, et al. 2001. A case study of two Mexican biospgere reserves. The Upper Gulf of California/Colorado River Delta and Pinacate/Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserves. 2000 UNESCO Conference on Biodiversity and Society, Columbia University Earthscape (an electronic journal). www.earthscape/org/rr1/cbs01/html.
|
| 6 |
Búrquez, A. & C. Castillo. 1994. Reserva de la biosfera El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar: entorno biológico y social. Estudios Sociales 5(9):9-64.
|
| 7 |
Búrquez, A. y A. Martínez-Yrízar. 2006. Conservation and Landscape Transformation northwestern Mexico: Status and future of biological reserves. p. 465-475 + bibliografía. En: R.S. Felger and B. Broyles (eds). DRY BORDERS: Great Natural Areas of the Gran Desierto and Upper Gulf of California. University of Utah Press. 750 p.
|
| 8 |
Castillo-Sánchez, C. 1999. Highways and Wildlife Conservation in Mexico: The Sonoran Pronghorn Antelope at the El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve along the Mexico – USA Border. Instituto Nacional de Ecología. Reserva de la biosfera de El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar. Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
|
| 9 |
Chester, C.C. 2006. Conservation across Borders. Biodiversity in an Interdependent World. Island Press.
|
| 10 |
Ganster, P. 1996. Environmental Issues of the California-Baja California Border Region. Border Environment Research Reports (Number 1 – June 1996). San Diego State University.
|
| 11 |
Goudie, A., Seely, M. 2011. World Heritage Desert Landscapes: Potential Priorities for the Recognition of Desert Landscapes and Geomorphological Sites on the World Heritage List. Gland, Switzerland. IUCN. 44pp.
|
| 12 |
Grageda Garcia, Miguel Angel. (2023). Conservation Status and Human Impacts on Two Endangered Subspecies in the Pinacate Biosphere Reserve in Sonora, Mexico: The Sonoran Pronghorn (Antilocapra Americana Sonoriensis) and the Sonoyta Mud Turtle (Kinosternon Sonoriense Longifemorale). (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA).
|
| 13 |
Gutmann, J. T. 2007. Geologic Studies in the Pinacate Volcanic Field. Journal of the Southwest, Vol. 49, No. 2, 189-243.
|
| 14 |
Gutmann, J. T. 2011. Estudios Geológicos en el Campo Volcánico de El Pinacate. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Estación Regional del Noroeste, Publicaciones Ocasionales No. 5, 53 pp., Hermosillo.
|
| 15 |
Hayden, J.D. 1998. The Sierra Pinacate. Southwest Center Series. University of Arizona Press. Tucson, Arizona.
|
| 16 |
Hume, B. 2000. Water in the U.S.-Mexico Border Area. Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2.
|
| 17 |
IUCN, 2013. Evaluation of El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve. In: IUCN, 2013. IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List. WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B2. Gland, Switzerland.
|
| 18 |
Lara-Resendiz, R., T. Jezkova, P.R.. Rosen and F. R. Méndez-de La Cruz. 2014. Thermoregulation during the summer season in the Goode’s horned lizard Phrynosoma goodei (Iguania: Phrynosomatidae) in Sonoran Desert. Amphibia-Reptilia 35:161-172.
|
| 19 |
Morehouse, B., Ferguson, D.B., Owen, G., Browning-Aiken, A., Wong-Gonzalez, P., Pineda, N., Varady, R. 2008 Science and socio-ecological resilience: examples from the Arizona-Sonora Border. Review. Environmental Science & Policy 11 (2008) 272 – 284.
|
| 20 |
Moya, H., Peters, E., Zamorano, P. 2011. La importancia de un enfoque regional para la conservación del hábitat natural en la frontera norte de México. In: Sánchez, O., Zamorano, P., Peters, E., Moya, H. (ed). 2011. Temas sobre conservación de vertebrados silvestres en México, pp. 49 – 68.
|
| 21 |
Mumme, S.P. 2000. Minute 242 and Beyond: Challenges and Opportunities for Managing Transboundary Groundwater on the Mexico-U.S. Border. Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2.
|
| 22 |
Reserva de la Biosfera El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar (n.d.) Especies exóticas e invasoras (online). Available at: https://elpinacate.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Tripti…
|
| 23 |
Salazar, J., Spalding, M. N.d. Adjacent U.S.-Mexican Border Natural Protected Areas: Protection, Management, and Cooperation. In: D. Rick Van Schoik, Elena Lelea, and John Cunningham, Salazar, J., Spalding, M., Brown, C., Czerniak, R., Buscaglia, C. Graizbord, C. de la Fuente, E., Singh, J. The US-Mexican Border Environment. Transboundary Ecosystem Management. Pp. 69-107. SCERP Monograph 15.
|
| 24 |
Sinervo et al. 2010. Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 328: 894-899.
|
| 25 |
Sistema de Areas Naturales Protegidas del Estado de Sonora (SANPES). 1994. Programa de Manejo. Reserva de la Biosfera El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar, Municipios de Plutarco, Elias Calles, Puerto Penasco y San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico. Hermosillo, Sonora.
|
| 26 |
State Party of Mexico (2020). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico). [online] Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/document/188328>
|
| 27 |
State Party of Mexico (2023a). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico). [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/191663 [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|
| 28 |
State Party of Mexico (2023b). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico). [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/217856 [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|
| 29 |
State Party of Mexico (2024). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico). [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1410/documents/ [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|
| 30 |
State Party of Mexico (2025). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico). [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/219768 [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|
| 31 |
UNESCO (2021). World Heritage Centre - State of Conservation El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico) [online] World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4178 [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|
| 32 |
UNESCO (2023). World Heritage Centre - State of Conservation El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico) [online] World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4319 [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|
| 33 |
UNESCO (2024). World Heritage Centre - State of Conservation El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico) [online] World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4634 [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|
| 34 |
Villers-Ruiz, L., Trejo-Vasquez, I. 1998. Climate Change on Mexican Forests and Natural Protected Areas. Global Environmental Change. Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 141-157.
|
| 35 |
World Heritage Committee (2013). Decision: 37 COM 8B.16 El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (Mexico). In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 37th Session ((Phnom Penh, 2013). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5150
|
| 36 |
World Heritage Committee (2024). Decision 46 COM 7B.55: El Pinacate and Gran Desierto de Altar Biosphere Reserve (Mexico) (N 1410). [online] World Heritage Committee, New Delhi. In: WHC/24/46.COM/17. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/8581 [Accessed on 17 June 2015]
|