Sagarmatha National Park

© IUCN/ Remco van Merm
Country
Nepal
Inscribed in
1979
Criterion
(vii)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "significant concern" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.

Sagarmatha is an exceptional area with dramatic mountains, glaciers and deep valleys, dominated by Mount Everest, the highest peak in the world (8,848 m). Several rare species, such as the snow leopard and the lesser panda, are found in the park. The presence of the Sherpas, with their unique culture, adds further interest to this site. © UNESCO

© IUCN/ Remco van Merm
© IUCN/ Remco van Merm

Summary

2025 Conservation Outlook

Finalised on
11 Oct 2025
Significant concern
Sagarmatha National Park has become an increasingly popular tourism destination especially among trekkers and mountaineers who today take advantage of the improved access afforded by aircraft. The property is suffering from a suite of long-standing and growing threats related to tourism impact (uncontrolled development, pollution, waste management, energy demand, introduction of donkeys for transport and intrusive aircrafts), deforestation, unsustainable resource extraction, poaching and disruption to Sherpa social structures. Climate change impacts are poorly understood but known to be affecting fire frequency and severity, as well as glacier melting expanding glacial lakes, which heightens the risk from glacial lake outburst flooding (GLOFs). Management responses to the problems are commendable, but failing to keep pace with the pressures on the Park. The 2023 revised Management Plan includes provisions to address overcrowding and regulate tourism activities, however these efforts have struggled to keep pace with the rapidly increasing visitor numbers. Despite recent policies, such as Nepal's January 2024 "Construction of Physical Infrastructure Inside Protected Areas" policy, which aim to promote environmental sustainability, the growing tourism pressure continues to challenge the park’s conservation efforts. Further improvements in planning, management, and enforcement are essential to protect the park's outstanding natural and cultural values for future generations.

Current state and trend of VALUES

Low Concern
The property was inscribed for the outstanding scenic values of its spectacular high mountain landscape, which remain intact, but is compromised by over development of tourism. Uncontrolled growth in visitor numbers leading to water pollution, solid waste impacts and the intrusion of helicopters for recreational use, are combining to degrade the natural setting and values of the property. The controversial development of a resort facility at 4,200m above sea level was inappropriate and creates an unfortunate precedent for other tourism operators. Climate change exacerbates these issues, with glaciers retreating at a rate of up to 5 meters per year and the risk of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). The threat to human life by glacial lake outburst floods is being mitigated by management intervention and monitoring, although there is no practical management intervention to halt the process of glacial retreat.

Overall THREATS

High Threat
Sagarmatha National Park faces a complex interplay of current and potential threats that jeopardize its ecological integrity and cultural heritage. The vast majority of the various long-standing, increasing, and potential threats to the values of the property are those arising from increasing tourism, which is being inadequately addressed by the State Party. The contentious development of a sizable tourism resort within the park has been legally resolved, but urgent work is required to understand the impacts of the track used to service the resort, which bisects an important ecosystem. The threat of rivers, wetlands, and water sources along the major trails being contaminated from improper effluent discharge, untreated human waste, and garbage dumping is very high. Other threats, such as localised quarrying, cultural use of forest resources of unknown sustainability, and increased risk of forest fire, require some management intervention. The demonstrated doubling of tourist numbers before the end of the management planning period raises very serious concerns in regard to the capacity of the property's management to effectively implement strategies devised in the management plan to mitigate against the actual and potential impacts of this unpredicted and open-ended growth in tourism. The cumulative effects of tourism, climate change, waste mismanagement, poaching, deforestation, overgrazing, infrastructure development, and the looming risk of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs) require a multifaceted and collaborative approach. Addressing these challenges necessitates the combined efforts of government agencies, non-governmental organisations, local communities, and international stakeholders to implement sustainable practices, enforce regulations, and promote conservation initiatives that preserve the park for future generations.

Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT

Some Concern
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is characterized by a robust and adaptive framework that integrates legal, institutional, and community-based approaches to address both internal and external threats. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), supported by the Nepal Army, enforces anti-poaching laws, monitors illegal activities, and prevents wildlife crime, particularly in high-altitude and remote areas. The revised Management Plan (2016-2020) provides a comprehensive strategy to tackle challenges such as unregulated tourism, habitat degradation, and climate change through zonation strategies, tourism management protocols, and climate adaptation measures. However, the plan is now outdated and a new management plan is not yet available. Advanced tools like the Visitor Tracking System regulate tourist activities, while partnerships with the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) improve waste management and reduce pollution. The establishment of Buffer Zone Management Committees ensures active community participation, fostering a sense of shared responsibility for conservation efforts. Despite these efforts, challenges such as trail degradation and littering persist, necessitating continued adaptive management and resource allocation. Furthermore, it is concerning that a 2024 amendment of wildlife legislation seems to allow the construction of hydropower and tourism resorts in national parks.

Full assessment

Click the + and - signs to expand or collapse full accounts of information under each topic. You can also view the entire list of information by clicking Expand all on the top left.

Description of values

Dramatic high mountain scenery and superlative natural phenomena including the planet’s highest mountain

Criterion
(vii)
Sagarmatha National Park is an exceptional area of natural beauty with superb natural phenomena that includes dramatic mountains, glaciers and deep valleys. The area contains Mount Sagarmatha (Everest), which is the highest peak in the world (8,848 m above sea level), and seven other peaks over 7,000 m (World Heritage Committee, 2014).

Geological features of outstanding scenic value

Criterion
(vii)
The site represents a major stage of the Earth’s evolutionary history and is one of the most geologically interesting regions in the world with high, geologically young mountains and glaciers creating awe inspiring landscapes and scenery dominated by the high peaks and corresponding deeply-incised valleys (World Heritage Committee, 2014).
Rare species
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is home to several rare species including the snow leopard, the musk deer and the red panda, as well as containing the world’s highest ecologically characteristic flora and fauna (World Heritage Committee, 2014).
  Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) in Nepal serves as a critical habitat for rare and endangered species, including the snow leopard (Panthera uncia), red panda (Ailurus fulgens), and Himalayan monal (Lophophorus impejanus). Its unique alpine and subalpine ecosystems are vital for maintaining biodiversity and ecological balance. (Lamichhane, 2024; Scott, 2024). The recent discovery of Pallas's cat (Otocolobus manul) which is a near-threatened species in IUCN red list, in the park, based on genetic evidence from scat samples, further highlights its importance as a biodiversity hotspot. This finding adds a new species to the park's known mammal list and extends the known range of Pallas's cat into eastern Nepal. The park's high-altitude ecosystems are also crucial for studying climate change impacts and conserving rare and elusive species, such as the Pallas's cat, which relies on prey like the Royle's pika (Ochotona roylei). The presence of such charismatic predators can be leveraged to raise public awareness and promote conservation efforts in this iconic World Heritage Site (Seimon et al., 2022; Sherpa, 2016; UNESCO).
Intricate linkages of the Sherpa culture with the area
SNP is deeply intertwined with the rich Sherpa culture, which plays a vital role in the sustainable conservation of its natural resources. SNP has ten villages housing over 3000 Sherpas who have inhabited the region for the last five centuries. There has been a continuation of Sherpa traditional practices both cultural and religious, which includes the restriction of animal hunting and slaughtering, as well as the protection of many sacred forests and other sacred natural sites, and traditional management of community forests and grazing areas. The entire national park is regarded by Sherpas as a sacred valley (beyul), in which all wildlife is protected. These practices strongly contribute to the successful conservation of SNP (World Heritage Committee, 2014; State Party of Nepal, 2022).

Assessment information

High Threat
It must be acknowledged that there is no serious threat to the core World Heritage value – an example of superlative and exceptional natural beauty, which is embedded in the vivid mountains, glaciers, deep valleys and majestic peaks including the world's highest peak. However, tourism numbers have increased alarmingly with resultant significant impacts from peak-season overcrowding, developments and waste disposal, including litter and human waste. Coupled with increasing tourism is the increasing use of helicopter access, which impact on the property's natural quiet system, the sense of remoteness and its scenic value. The property also has associated biodiversity values and the intricate linkages of the Sherpa culture with the ecosystem form the basis for the sustainable conservation of the natural resources, which in turn contributes to the wellbeing of the local Sherpa communities. These associated values are under threat by the very dramatic increase in tourism and tourism-related activities, such as the inappropriate use of helicopters. The legal dispute over the operation of the Kongde View Resort within the property has been legally resolved, but its continued operation and increasing environmental impacts sets a poor precedent for tourism management within the site. The use of donkeys for transport and the unsustainable use of Park resources for infrastructure adds to the increasing concerns. The Management Plan acknowledges these threats and provides a broad range of proposed actions required to mitigate against impacts of tourism, but the property's management capacity to effectively undertake these actions in view of the alarming increase in visitation is yet to be tested. The increasing use of donkeys and the risk of introducing invasive plant species through their feed must be addressed as a matter of priority. The property faces some emerging challenges posed by glacier recession, glacial outburst floods (both glacial lake outburst flood as well as other floods related to glacier melting).
Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Reported continued operation of the Kongde View Resort)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
The operation of two commercial lodges/resorts (the Kongde Hotels), which were believed to be within the property, and the protracted legal process concerning their future has been a concern since their construction in 2005. The legal proceedings within the Supreme Court of Nepal were finalized in 2019 with the court finding in favour of the resort owners (State Party of Nepal, 2019; Sapkota, 2019). The 2016 IUCN Advisory Mission noted that some stakeholders believed that documentation used to prove ownership of the area had been obtained illegally, while another report published online present the view that while such documentation may be legal they were the result of a corrupt process (IUCN, 2016; UNESCO, 2018; Sapkota, 2019). The operation of this facility at 4,200 m above sea level within the property is inappropriate and creates an unfortunate precedent for other tourism operators (UNESCO, 2014). Further inappropriateness is evidenced by the observation by the 2016 mission that the trail to access and service the hotels bisects an extremely sensitive and ecologically intact biodiversity rich part of the property. The mission report concludes that the trail has more impact on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) than the two hotels (IUCN, 2016; UNESCO, 2018), and operation of the hotels seems to be a significant element if there is increased helicopter operations affecting the aesthetic amenity of the property. The park authorities have established a check post to monitor the resort's activities (State Party of Nepal, 2024), but the long-term impacts on the park's OUV remain a concern (UNESCO, 2023). The resort's operations could lead to habitat fragmentation and increased pressure on natural resources (Bhatta & Chan, 2023).
Mining & Quarrying
(Rock extraction)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Whilst the original park management plan advocated as a condition of rock extraction that rehabilitation and restoration planting be part of the approval process, it appears that this has largely not been undertaken (IUCN Consultation, 2014) and the 2016 IUCN Advisory Mission notes significant impacts from quarrying activities within the property (IUCN, 2016). The mission accepted that the utilisation of local rock for construction purposes is unavoidable and justifiable, but took the position that rock should be sourced from outside the property where feasible, and that no rock extraction for commercial or industrial purposes should take place within the property. It further notes that there are significant areas of disturbance, which should be subject to site restoration and rehabilitation measures. Site restoration would be a reasonable condition when approval for rock extraction is given, and this should be supported by some form of financial bond to ensure that all of the conditions of permits are observed. The mission recommended that the State Party include in the 2016-2020 Management Plan a specific section on quarrying, which details the conditions for quarrying both within (where unavoidable) and outside the property and specifies a restoration and site rehabilitation standard (IUCN, 2016). However, neither the Management Plan nor the two subsequent State Party's State of Conservation reports have addressed the issue of quarrying or the recommendations of the 2016 IUCN Advisory Mission (State Party of Nepal, 2017; 2019).
Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees
(Firewood collection)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Whilst it has been reported that there has been some decline in firewood collection, some of the highest forests closest to Mount Sagarmatha (Mt Everest) are reported to still be under severe threat from tourism development and village firewood use. The forests on the left bank of the Imja Khola (river) supply the major village of Pangboche and all of the alpine hotels en route to Everest Base Camp (IUCN Consultation, 2014). The State Party reports that the growing number of tourists puts pressure on the need for fuel wood for both cooking and heating and this may have a direct impact on existing forests (State Party of Nepal, 2014). Consequently in 2016, the World Heritage Committee expressed concern that firewood collection is not comprehensively addressed in the draft Management Plan other than promoting alternative energy and an Advisory Mission was tasked with investigating the issue. The 2016 IUCN mission noted that the availability of reticulated power within the property and buffer zone had significantly reduced the use of firewood and the 2018 State of Conservation report notes that the Buffer Zone Management Committee has totally banned firewood collection in the Namche area and that enforcement patrols had not detected any illegal activity (State Party of Nepal, 2017). Despite a 30% reduction in deforestation since 2010 due to the promotion of alternative energy sources like LPG and solar power, firewood collection persists in areas with limited energy access. This contributes to soil erosion and impacts water retention, increasing the likelihood of landslides. Although the use of firewood has been largely replaced by alternative energy sources, some collection still occurs. The park management has banned firewood collection within the property, but enforcement remains a challenge (SNP, 2023). The demand for firewood, particularly for heating and cooking in lodges, is leading to deforestation and habitat degradation in some areas (Bhatta & Chan, 2023).
Identity/social cohesion/ changes in local population and community that result in negative impact
(Changes in local population and community)
Data Deficient
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
With a dramatic increase in tourism has come a change in the demographic profile of the traditional Sherpa residents of the Park, with many people relocating to Kathmandu as they have become wealthier from servicing tourism. This appears to have resulted in the remaining Sherpa population tending to be made up of older and younger people with fewer in the middle-aged bracket (IUCN Consultation, 2014). The 2016 IUCN Advisory Mission noted a transition from families offering basic food/lodging to trekkers to the present day lodges with deluxe to super deluxe suites. Basic facilities and services have been replaced by Wi-Fi internet, room service, laundering, hot shower, restaurant, bar services and bakeries (IUCN, 2016; Mu et al., 2018). During the peak seasons (Oct/Nov and Mar/Apr) the demand for accommodation exceed the supply. The mission further noted that there were some 600 lodges within the property and lodge owners compete for business by offering accommodation at little or no cost on the condition that guests purchase their meals at the place where they are staying. This unsustainable business practice contributes to environmental degradation because lodge operators then have to cut corners in terms of solid waste disposal, garbage, etc. Another concern is the increase in owners of land within the buffer zone who build lodges and then lease them to “non-residents”. These arrangements are generally made with people who have come from outside the area with little sensitivity to cultural or environmental values, and need to generate significant revenue to pay the owner, purchase fuel and food, and pay service staff. The mission recommended that the State Party provide information on the number and capacity of lodges located within the property and its buffer zone, and note whether they are operated by the owners or are leased (IUCN, 2016). The State Party has not responded in either the 2017 or 2019 State of Conservation reports.
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution, Garbage & Solid Waste
(Increasing human waste and inappropriate treatment practice)
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Waste management in Sagarmatha National Park still presents significant challenges despite the efforts of the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC). About 10,000 kg of garbage was brought from disposal site in 2018 and again in 2022 (State Party of Nepal, 2024). In 2023, the SPCC collected approximately 85 tonnes of waste from the region, including 14,000 kg from the Everest Base Camp and surrounding areas (UNESCO, 2023). The increasing influx of tourists and mountaineers has intensified waste generation, particularly in high-traffic locations such as Namche Bazaar (Bhatta & Chan, 2023). Improperly managed waste poses severe environmental threats, including leaching into water systems, which can degrade water quality and disrupt downstream ecosystems. The remote, high-altitude environment further complicates waste disposal due to logistical constraints (UNEP-WCMC). Additionally, the accumulation of visible waste detracts from the park’s natural aesthetics, undermining its value to eco-conscious travellers and threatening its reputation as a pristine destination. These challenges highlight the urgent need for improved and sustainable waste management solutions to protect the park’s ecological integrity and tourism appeal.
The continued efforts by the SNP in collaboration with the Sagarmantha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) to address tourism-related waste include waste containers on trails, waste removal, and proposed development of an Action Plan for waste removal (State Party of Nepal, 2024).

Recreational Activities
(Very high rate of increased tourism use )
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
The rapid growth of tourism and mountaineering in Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) has introduced numerous threats that jeopardize its environmental integrity, cultural heritage, and socio-economic stability. The influx of approximately 45,000 tourists annually, as reported in 2023, compared to an estimated 4,000 visitors in the 1970's (IUCN, 2016), has overwhelmed the park’s infrastructure and placed significant strain on its ecosystems (Bhatta and Chan, 2023). Increase in unmanaged tourism has important impact on garbage disposal, human waste management, general sanitation, trail erosion, overcrowding at monasteries and religious sites, congestion on trails and bridges and excessive noise, affecting the natural ecosystem.
One pressing environmental challenge is deforestation, driven by the heavy reliance on firewood for cooking and heating in lodges and hotels, which depletes the already scarce forest resources in the high-altitude region. Additionally, improper waste disposal has led to severe pollution, with the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) collecting over 85 tonnes of waste from Base Camp and higher altitudes in the same year, underscoring the magnitude of waste management issues (SNP, 2023). This unmanaged waste contributes to water contamination, soil erosion, and long-term environmental degradation. Furthermore, the competition for limited resources, such as water and food, between tourists and local communities exacerbates socio-economic tensions, threatening the sustainability of local livelihoods (UNEP-WCMC, 2023). The cultural impact is equally concerning, as the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) has highlighted the risk of cultural homogenization. Sherpa traditions are increasingly being commercialized or replaced to cater to tourist demands, which dilutes the authenticity of their cultural practices and erodes their heritage (UNEP-WCMC, 2023). These threats are further aggravated by the lack of strict enforcement of environmental regulations and the limited capacity of local authorities to address waste and resource management effectively (SNP 2023). Without the implementation of sustainable tourism practices, the park’s unique biodiversity, cultural identity, and natural beauty remain at significant risk. A study to establish the appropriate visitor carrying capacity for the property, especially during peak seasons, repeatedly recommended by the World Heritage Committee (UNESCO, 2023), is still needed.
However, efforts to regulate the increasing visitor numbers are ongoing. A Visitors Tracking System has been established to monitor and regulate tourism (State Party of Nepal, 2024; UNESCO, 2023). Procedures are implemented to regulate the hotel, lodge and tea shop, and waste management within the property.
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution
(Pollution of the highland lakes by increased human incursion)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Conservation of high mountain wetlands has become an increasingly significant global issue in the recent years, especially given that these wetlands function as water towers for the world. They are important resting sites and habitats for a significant number of migratory and some resident water birds. The high-altitude flora and fauna are important for global biological diversity as there are very few other places where life exists at such unique high altitudes. In Nepal, very limited studies and research have been conducted focusing on high mountain wetlands. There is paucity of information, therefore, making it difficult to get a clear idea on their status especially with regards to the threats and their management. The wetlands of the Sagarmatha National Park, listed as a Ramsar site in 2007, cover an area of 7,700 ha. Out of the cluster of six lakes, Gokyo is the most important wetland, and is believed to be the abode of snake-god, and is, therefore, culturally important. The local people are also dependent on the site for ecotourism, which is the main economic activity of the people living there. The major threats to the wetlands are garbage and sewage left by visitors because of unregulated tourism, water pollution, over-grazing of pastures, unsustainable harvest of natural resources and impact of climate change. They are compounded by an inadequate understanding of the wetland systems and multiple ownership with poor institutional mechanisms to coordinate management (DNPWC, 2016). The Management Plan proposes to prepare an inventory of wetlands and conduct assessment and monitoring of the lakes to keep them free from pollution and to strengthen awareness programs for conservation of the wetlands. The rapid increase in tourism would be increasing the impact of garbage and sewage pollution beyond the capacity of management to implement effective intervention measures.
Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs))
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Climate change is severely impacting high mountain ecosystems, leading to glacial retreat and the formation of new glacial lakes, which increase the risk of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs). The 2024 ICIMOD study identified over 20 potentially dangerous glacial lakes in the region, with lakes like Imja Tsho posing imminent threats to ecosystems and human settlements. The socioeconomic impacts of GLOFs could be devastating, including loss of life, infrastructure destruction, and long-term ecological damage. While early warning systems and disaster preparedness plans are being developed, the scale of the challenge remains significant (ICIMOD, 2024; UNEP-WCMC, 2024).
Changes in Temperature Regimes
(Rising temperatures and altered precipitation patterns)
High Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
The impacts of climate change in Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) are exacerbating existing threats from tourism and mountaineering, further endangering the park's fragile high-altitude ecosystems and local communities. Accelerated glacial melt, driven by rising temperatures, has led to rapid glacier retreat, with some glaciers shrinking by up to 20 meters annually (ICIMOD, 2024). This retreat has caused the formation of new glacial lakes, such as Imja Tsho, which has grown by approximately 50% in volume over the past decade, significantly increasing the risk of catastrophic Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs). A potential GLOF could release over 60 million cubic meters of water, threatening downstream settlements and critical infrastructure, including trekking routes and lodges that are vital to the region’s tourism economy (ICIMOD, 2024).

Additionally, rising temperatures are altering vegetation patterns, forcing alpine plants to shift to higher altitudes and allowing invasive species to encroach on native habitats. These changes disrupt the ecological balance and pose severe threats to biodiversity, impacting iconic and endangered species such as the snow leopard and red panda (SNP Report, 2022). The ongoing climate-induced changes, coupled with the pressure from tourism, which is a key economic driver for the region, further strain the park's natural resources. Tourism activities, already contributing to deforestation, soil erosion, and waste management challenges, are now also at risk due to changing weather patterns and the degradation of trekking routes caused by unstable environments (SNP Report, 2022).

The park’s management has acknowledged these challenges and is incorporating climate adaptation strategies into its revised management plan. However, the impacts of climate change demand continuous monitoring and adaptive management to mitigate risks and ensure the sustainability of tourism and biodiversity conservation in the region. Without proactive measures, the combined effects of climate change and tourism could lead to irreversible damage to the park’s unique natural and cultural heritage.
Conflict, Civil Unrest & Security Activities
(Poaching of endangered species )
Low Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
Illegal poaching poses a significant threat to biodiversity in Sagarmatha National Park, particularly targeting endangered species such as the Himalayan Musk Deer. Poachers seek the musk deer for their valuable glands, which are highly prized in traditional medicine (WWF-Nepal, 2024). During the COVID-19 pandemic, reduced patrolling led to a temporary increase in poaching and unauthorised activities, highlighting the vulnerability of the park's wildlife during periods of decreased surveillance (UNESCO, 2023, State Party of Nepal, 2024). Although enhanced patrolling and collaboration with local communities have helped mitigate these threats, poaching remains a persistent challenge, particularly for species of high economic and ecological value (SNP, 2023). In addition to poaching, illegal logging and resource extraction, though less widespread, continue to pose localised threats to the park's ecosystems (Bhatta & Chan, 2023). Sustained vigilance, community engagement, and strengthened enforcement are essential to safeguard the park’s biodiversity and maintain the integrity of its ecosystems.
Residential Areas, Commercial & Industrial Areas, Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Commercial and Industrial Development.)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
The development of tourism-related infrastructure, including roads and hotels, has led to habitat fragmentation and increased pressure on the park's ecosystems. This development is particularly evident in the buffer zone, where built-up areas have expanded to accommodate the growing number of tourists (Gupta, 2024). The construction of infrastructure often involves deforestation and land-use changes, which threaten the park's biodiversity and the traditional livelihoods of local communities (Bhatta & Chan, 2023).
Other Human Disturbances
(Increased use of donkeys for transport into the property)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
From around 2011, donkeys have been increasingly used to transport freight (building materials and tourism supplies) into the property, causing damage to local trails and creating intensive grazing pressure on native flora in some areas. Photographs on the internet show donkeys as far up as the Everest Base Camp. The 2016 IUCN Advisory Mission notes that there were about 500 registered donkeys, plus as many as 500 unregistered donkeys, operating within the property and its buffer zone. Groups of up to 60 donkeys are commonly encountered along trails in the property resulting in delays of up to one hour for visitors to traverse narrow sections of the trail. The mission report further notes that as well as causing congestion for visitor movement the donkeys excrete a significant amount of dung, which attracts flies and emits an unpleasant odour (IUCN, 2016). The mission recommended that the State Party collaborate with the Buffer Zone User Committees to formulate and implement measures to better manage the use of donkeys. The State Party’s subsequent reports are silent in regard to the Advisory Mission concerns about impact by donkeys.
Atmospheric & Space Activities
(Increased use of aircraft)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
There has been an increase in the use of aircrafts, in particular helicopters, due to an increase in the numbers of tourist who require access to the site (IUCN Consultation, 2014). Increased use of aircrafts impact the visitor amenity of the site, compromising the aesthetic value of the property by the unrelenting noise and visual impacts directly caused by uncontrolled and unregulated helicopter use (IUCN, 2016). The 2016 IUCN Advisory Mission observed that helicopter flights to various locations within the property commenced as early as 6 am and continued almost unabated for more than ten hours on some days. Between four and seven helicopters operating is the norm. The report further notes marketing and promotion for a wide range of helicopter-supported activities within the property include skydiving, rescue operations, medical evacuations, sightseeing, general cargo activities and a “taxi service” between a variety of locations within the property (IUCN, 2016).
While some helicopter use is justified, particularly in relation to emergency situations, it is conservatively estimated that as much as 70% of the helicopter traffic within the property (as opposed to the buffer zone) is for sightseeing, shifting freight and tourism-related commercial use. A search of the internet reveals several tour operators promoting helicopter tours varying from one to four hour sight-seeing tours through to multi-day trek-in/fly out options. The State Party reported in 2017 and reiterates in 2019 and 2022 and 2024 that helicopters are used for rescue and relief works and that DNPWC and SNP Authority conducted the meeting regularly for regulating the helicopter flights (State Party of Nepal, 2017, 2019, 2022, 2024). Although helicopter rescue operations are reported, no response has been provided regarding the request to address monitoring and regulation of tourism-related helicopter traffic.
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals, Gathering, Harvesting & Controlling Terrestrial Plants & Fungi
(Overgrazing by livestock in high mountain pastures)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Overgrazing in high-altitude pastures has led to the degradation of fragile alpine ecosystems. Studies conducted in 2023 by ICIMOD (2024) revealed that over 25% of pastures in villages like Namche Bazaar and Dingboche show signs of overuse, with reduced vegetation cover and soil compaction. Overgrazing also exacerbates competition for resources among wildlife and livestock, further impacting biodiversity.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive and Other Problematic Species )
Low Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Invasive species, including feral dogs, invasive plants, and non-native fish, pose significant threats to the biodiversity and ecological integrity of Sagarmatha National Park. Feral and local dogs, often left in the forest after religious ceremonies, attack red pandas, particularly during the mating and cub-rearing seasons. This threat is exacerbated by the lack of scientific evidence and management strategies to control feral dog populations (Lamichhane, 2024). Invasive plant species, such as Eupatorium adenophorum, are outcompeting native vegetation, reducing biodiversity and disrupting ecological balance. The spread of invasive plants is facilitated by tourism and infrastructure development, which introduce non-native species to the park (Bhatta & Chan, 2023). Invasive fish species, introduced through tourism activities like recreational fishing, threaten native fish populations and alter water quality, leading to a decline in aquatic biodiversity (Bhandari et al., 2015). These invasive species disrupt native ecosystems, outcompete local flora and fauna, and introduce diseases, threatening the park's Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). Additionally, the use of an uncertain but large number of donkeys to carry goods into the property as recent and non-traditional form of transport creates an immediate and very important need to assess and mitigate against the risk of the feed being supplied to the donkeys containing seeds of plants that will potentially introduce invasive alien species of plants to the property.

Conflict, Civil Unrest & Security Activities
(Park people Conflict)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Park-people conflict in Sagarmatha National Park arises from the competing needs of conservation and local livelihoods. Local communities, particularly the Sherpas, rely on the park's resources for agriculture, livestock grazing, and firewood. However, conservation policies often restrict these activities to protect biodiversity, leading to tensions. For example, the ban on firewood collection within the park has forced communities to seek alternative energy sources, but enforcement remains a challenge (SNP annual report, 2023). Additionally, human-wildlife conflict, such as crop damage by Himalayan tahr and livestock predation by snow leopards, has led to economic losses for local communities, further exacerbating tensions (Silwal et al., 2022). The lack of adequate compensation schemes and community involvement in decision-making processes has also contributed to the conflict (Bhatta & Chan, 2023). The buffer zone program has further intensified these issues, with imbalanced development creating social tensions. Communities closer to popular trekking routes and tourist hubs like Namche Bazaar receive more economic benefits, while those in remote areas are often marginalised, undermining local support for conservation (Sun & Watanabe, 2021). The Sherpa community's deep cultural and spiritual connection to the land is also threatened by restrictions on traditional practices such as grazing, firewood collection, and medicinal plant harvesting. These restrictions, aimed at protecting biodiversity, have led to conflicts between park authorities and local communities, further eroding cultural heritage and livelihoods (Bhatta & Chan, 2023). Without equitable benefit-sharing, community involvement, and conflict resolution mechanisms, park-people conflict poses a significant threat to both the park's ecological integrity and the well-being of its indigenous communities.
Low Threat
Hydropower development in Sagarmatha National Park and its buffer zones poses significant threats to its ecological integrity and biodiversity. The financial success of some locals through the tourism business is bringing about cultural change as local Sherpas are being replaced, voluntarily it must be noted, by people whose cultural beliefs and notion of the landscape may not mirror those of the Sherpas. Poaching may become more prevalent, particularly so because this new community, entirely dependent on the tourism economy for its survival, may turn to poaching of wildlife in order to survive the economic fallout in case of any future significant disruption of tourism.
Other Human Disturbances
(Unregulated and illegal use of resources )
Data Deficient
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
The 2016 IUCN Advisory Mission noted evidence that unregulated resource use and poaching continues as a threat to the property (IUCN, 2016). Although wildlife hunting was not seen as a major issue as almost all the local residents had strong cultural beliefs, which precluded harming other living beings. However, an increasing percentage of new local residents (porters, service staff and lessees of Sherpa owned commercial ventures) do not share these cultural beliefs. The mission was informed of instances of the Nepal Army protection units locating and removing traps that had been set to capture Musk Deer. Another issue of concern is the use of juniper for cultural practices such as burning it each morning outside local houses as well as during special ceremonies. It is well recorded that large amounts of juniper are burned during Puja ceremonies to protect both Sherpas and expedition members at Everest Base Camp. Significant amounts of this slow-growing high altitude species are consumed annually for these events. The mission's recommendation that the State Party formulate methods to collect data on the use of living natural resources from the property, including but not limited to the use of juniper for local cultural practices, has not been addressed.
Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge systems that result in negative impact
(Total dependence on tourism economy)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
A very real threat to protected areas is that of the local community becoming completely, or almost completely, dependent on tourism revenue. Significant disruption to the flow of tourism revenue places severe strain on tourism dependent communities and this becomes an even bigger problem when elements of the community do not have traditional ties to the property.
The economic success of the local Sherpa people has resulted in parts of the property being occupied by people who do not share the Sherpas link with the environment and their economic well-being is based entirely on tourism. Such impoverished communities often find themselves with no option other than exploiting local biodiversity resources to sustain themselves, either by hunting for food or hunting to sell (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Concerns about a post-Covid reduction in tourist arrivals were wrong. However, many people will have resorted to harvesting natural resources in the Covid years and will likely continue looking to this opportunity for sustenance and/or commercial gain. In the event of yet another pandemic the threat of a return to subsistent hunting/gathering for survival should not be overlooked.
Dams & Water Management/Use
(Hydropower development )
High Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Hydropower development in Sagarmatha National Park and its buffer zones poses significant threats to its ecological integrity and biodiversity (UNESCO, 2023). Projects in areas like Chaurikharka and Lukla risk habitat fragmentation, ecosystem disruption, and adverse impacts on the park’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). A lack of comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) exacerbates these issues, as noted by the 2024 Ministry of Forests report. The recently approved policy on infrastructure development inside the protected areas has further intensified concerns, enabling large-scale hydropower projects with minimal safeguards. These developments threaten riverine ecosystems, disrupt natural hydrology, and impact Indigenous Sherpa livelihoods, which rely on tourism and agriculture. To protect the park’s status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, stricter environmental regulations, thorough impact assessments, and local community involvement are essential.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Mostly Effective
At the time of inscription, there were approximately 2,500 Sherpas living in the Park and another 7,500 people living in the buffer zone. Their lands within Sagarmatha National Park were excluded from the Park by legal definition (IUCN, 1979). Since that time, there has been ongoing involvement and support of local communities in the field of conservation and management. A Park Advisory Committee was established in 1982 (UNESCO, 2014), but has not been active since the 1980s. The current management framework of SNP, which designates the Sherpa as stakeholders rather than rights holders, undermines their autonomy and traditional governance systems. Recognizing and formalizing Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas (ICCAs) within SNP would not only uphold indigenous rights but also enhance conservation outcomes by integrating local knowledge and practices into park management (Stevens, 2013; SNP Management Plan, 2016). Recent studies emphasize the need for a rights-based conservation paradigm to address the ecological strain from tourism and ensure equitable benefit-sharing, as highlighted in the 2021 IUCN report on community conservation (IUCN, 2021).
Sherpa culture (including Buddhist values, traditions of protecting the region as a sacred valley, and still active community forest and pasture management systems) contributes strongly to nature conservation (Mu et al., 2018). The importance of tourism in the local economy has also encouraged Sherpas to help to protect the area. Men elected by village assemblies continue to take on the duties of coordinating the seasonal migration of livestock, preventing green wood cutting, protecting plantations and reporting poaching. They are authorized to prosecute and collect limited penalties from violators of the forest protection rules and to use the fines for community purposes (WCMC, 2011). Concerns however remain regarding the impact of tourism on social cohesion and cultural practices among Sherpa and other ethnic groups (IUCN Consultation, 2014; Mu et al., 2018). In addition to the basic function of the buffer zone in enhancing protection of the property’s OUV, the objective of the buffer zone management is cited in the Management Plan as garnering the support of local people and involving them in nature conservation. Accordingly, a Buffer Zone Management Committee (BZMC) overseeing three Buffer Zone User Committees (BZUCs) and 28 Buffer Zone User Groups (BZUGs), has been established and up to 50% of the Park revenue is channelled to the communities for the implementation of conservation and community development programmes aimed at institutional development, alternative natural resource development, capacity building, financial management, conservation education and awareness (DNPWC, 2024). The Management Plan notes that the buffer zone programme is a benefit sharing mechanism, which involves sustainable development, tourism promotion and reconciliation of the park-people interface. The programme has been very successful with regard to forest resource development, habitat protection in the buffer zone and community participation in conservation.
Legal framework
Some Concern
The legal framework of Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is rooted in the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act of 1973 and the Himalayan National Park Regulations of 1978. Subsequent measures, such as the declaration of a buffer zone in 2002 and the Buffer Zone Management Plan of 2004, emphasize community involvement in conservation and sustainable resource use.

Of some concern is the reported amendment of wildlife legislation in 2024 which allows the construction of hydropower and tourism resorts in national parks. The potential impact on the OUV remains uncertain (47 COM 7B.13).
Governance arrangements
Mostly Effective
Sagarmatha National Park employs a multi-tiered governance system that integrates central authorities, local communities, and NGOs to ensure effective protection and sustainable management of its biodiversity, cultural heritage, and natural resources. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC) oversees policy and regulatory aspects, while the Sagarmatha National Park Office manages on-ground operations. Local participation is facilitated through the Buffer Zone Management Committee (BZMC) and User Committees (BZUCs), alongside the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC), which addresses waste and pollution challenges. Law enforcement, supported by the Nepali Army and Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB), combats illegal activities. Nepal’s three-tier government structure federal, provincial, and local/municipal grants local municipalities, such as the Khumbu Pasang Lhamu Rural Municipality, authority over services and natural resources within their jurisdictions, including those within SNP. This decentralised governance model is expected to influence the management of SNP as a World Heritage site, ensuring that local stakeholders play an active role in its protection and sustainable management. Collaborations with IUCN, WWF, and UNESCO enhance adherence to global conservation standards. However, challenges such as tourism pressure, climate change, and infrastructure development threaten the park's Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). To mitigate these threats, strategies including revised management plans, tourism regulation, climate adaptation, and capacity-building for communities are being implemented, ensuring long-term protection of this UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Mostly Effective
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is deeply integrated into local, regional, and national planning systems, ensuring landscape connectivity and sustainable resource management. The 2016-2020 Management Plan emphasises the importance of transboundary cooperation, which remains a key feature of the park’s management strategy. At the national level, the park operates under the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act of 1973, supported by Buffer Zone Management Regulations and national biodiversity strategies, which provide a comprehensive legal and policy framework for conservation. Regionally, SNP is a key component of the Himalayan landscape, maintaining critical ecosystem continuity and biodiversity corridors through its buffer zone program. The immediate ecological connectivity is maintained through adjacent protected areas, including Makalu Barun National Park to the east, Gauri Shankar Conservation Area to the west, and the Qomolangma Nature Reserve in the Tibetan Autonomous Region to the north. These areas collectively enhance the conservation of SNP’s values and biodiversity. This program actively involves adjacent communities in sustainable resource management, fostering a collaborative approach to conservation. Locally, the Buffer Zone Management Committees (BZMCs) and User Committees (BZUCs) play a pivotal role in grassroots participation, promoting sustainable practices that balance conservation goals with the livelihoods of local communities. SNP also contributes to international initiatives such as the Sacred Himalayan Landscape and its UNESCO World Heritage designation, emphasizing landscape connectivity and transboundary conservation efforts. These multi-level integrations ensure that SNP’s conservation strategies are aligned with broader ecological and socio-economic objectives, enhancing the resilience of its ecosystems and supporting the well-being of local and regional stakeholders.
Boundaries
Some Concern
The boundaries of Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) are clearly defined by national borders and physical features, encompassing distinct ecological and geographical entities. While the park’s buffer zone, established to promote sustainable resource use and community involvement, has not been formally recognized as part of the inscribed World Heritage property, it plays a critical role in supporting ecological connectivity. In its 2024 State of Conservation Report, the State Party noted that extensive consultations with local communities revealed no support for formally recognising the buffer zone as part of the World Heritage property (State Party of Nepal, 2024). Despite this, ecological connectivity is maintained through adjacent protected areas, including Makalu Barun National Park to the east, Gauri Shankar Conservation Area to the west, and the Qomolangma Nature Reserve in the Tibetan Autonomous Region to the north. These areas collectively enhance the conservation of SNP’s values and biodiversity.
Overlapping international designations
Mostly Effective
Ramsar Site for the Gokyo Lakes, which partially overlaps with the park's boundaries, emphasizing the importance of wetland conservation within the broader landscape. These overlapping designations enhance the park's protection by providing additional legal and institutional frameworks. Both designations under the same managing authorities (State Party of Nepal, 2023).
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Some Concern
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) has taken significant steps to implement World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations, though challenges persist. Collaboration between park authorities, local stakeholders, and the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal has improved regulation of helicopter use, primarily for rescue and emergency operations, but stricter measures are needed to address unregulated traffic. Efforts to formalize the buffer zone remain stalled due to community objections, despite ongoing consultations. The revised Management Plan, nearing completion, includes a dedicated tourism chapter to manage visitor carrying capacity, though its effectiveness in addressing tourism growth is yet to be seen. The revised plan also incorporates a zonation system to enhance management of the core and buffer zones, aligning with conservation goals. Additionally, environmental compliance monitoring for projects like hydropower developments in the buffer zone has been strengthened, with EIAs and mitigation measures under close scrutiny.

Outstanding issues relate to the development of a Tourism Management Plan, the Ama Dablam micro-hydropower project and regarding the reported amendment of wildlife legislation in 2024 which allows the construction of hydropower and tourism resorts in national parks (47 COM 7B.13).
Climate action
Mostly Effective
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is a critical area for climate action due to its ecological importance and high vulnerability to global warming. Recent scientific studies, including a 2022 report in Nature Climate Change and the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (2021), highlight the severe impacts of climate change in the region, such as rapid glacier melt, permafrost thaw, and changing weather patterns. These changes threaten biodiversity, water resources, and the livelihoods of local communities. The park has already seen significant ice loss, increasing the risk of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), which pose dangers to people and infrastructure downstream. To address these challenges, SNP has taken proactive steps, including reforestation programs, promoting sustainable tourism, and implementing community-based monitoring systems. By combining traditional knowledge with scientific research, SNP is working to protect its unique environment and serve as a model for climate resilience in mountain regions. These efforts are essential to safeguarding the park’s natural and cultural heritage for future generations.
Management plan and overall management system
Some Concern
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) has a well-structured and adaptive management system designed to protect its unique biodiversity, cultural heritage, and natural resources while addressing modern challenges like climate change and tourism growth. The park’s management plan focuses on dividing the area into zones for conservation, sustainable resource use, and community activities, ensuring minimal harm to critical ecosystems. It combines traditional Sherpa practices with modern conservation techniques, including reforestation, anti-poaching efforts, and waste management. A visitor tracking system helps regulate tourism, reducing its environmental impact. SNP also works closely with local communities through buffer zone committees to promote sustainable practices and fair resource sharing. The management system is guided by scientific research and international standards, such as those from the IPCC and IUCN, to address urgent issues like glacier retreat and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). Nevertheless, the current management plan is now outdated and requires updating. According to the latest periodic report, the development of an updated comprehensive management plan is underway (State Party of Nepal, 2023).
Law enforcement
Mostly Effective
The park enforces strict regulations to address challenges such as illegal poaching, waste management, and unregulated activities, including the use of drones by visitors. Recent assessments highlight the importance of drone regulations under Nepal’s "Drone Related Procedure, 2019," which mandates multiple levels of approval from the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN), the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), and the District Administration Office (DAO), before final authorisation by the park authorities. These measures are essential to minimise disruptions to wildlife, protect cultural heritage, and ensure visitor safety. Enhanced monitoring systems, such as the Visitor Tracking System, and community-based enforcement mechanisms further support law enforcement efforts. The integration of traditional Sherpa conservation practices with modern technologies has bolstered compliance and accountability. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), supported by the Nepal Army, enforces anti-poaching laws, monitors illegal activities, and prevents wildlife crime, particularly in high-altitude and remote areas (DNPWC, 2024; UNESCO, 2024).
Sustainable finance
Some Concern
The 2016-2020 Management Plan acknowledges that the earlier plan could not be fully implemented due to budget constraints, which clearly suggests a lack of financial sustainability. The Plan indicates a budget requirement of US$6.5 million, including US$1.8 million for the buffer zone management requirements, and, while it notes that up to 50% of revenue generated by the Park can be applied to conservation and socio-economic development of the buffer zone, it is not possible to determine the anticipated source of the US$6.5 million (DNPWC, 2016). Funding of actions under the Management Plan are highly dependent on tourism revenue. The latest periodic report states that the available budget is acceptable but could be further improved to fully meet the management needs (State Party of Nepal, 2023). The development of a comprehensive management plan is underway, including a section on sustainable financing. Furthermore, there are enhanced efforts on improving coordination and cooperation with different conservation partners and local and provincial governments for funding in the plan implementation (State Party of Nepal, 2023).
Staff capacity, training and development
Some Concern
Staff capacity, training, and development at Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) remain areas of concern despite some progress. As of the 2024 State of Conservation Report, SNP employs 67 staff members, primarily game scouts stationed across ten ranger posts, supported by 250 Nepalese Army personnel for law enforcement (State Party of Nepal, 2024). However, staff turnover is high, and the number of personnel is insufficient to effectively manage the park’s growing challenges, particularly in tourism regulation and climate change adaptation. Training and capacity-building initiatives are prioritised in the 2016–2020 Management Plan, but implementation has been slow, with limited progress reported in the 2024 update. The lack of Sherpa representation among staff (only one Sherpa staff member as of 2013) further highlights the need for culturally inclusive recruitment and training programs. While the park has initiated some capacity-building activities, such as the establishment of a Tourism and Conservation Education Unit, these efforts are not yet fully operational or integrated into daily management practices. Strengthening staff capacity, enhancing training programs, and ensuring equitable representation of local communities are critical to addressing the park’s complex conservation and tourism management needs (DNPWC, 2016; State Party of Nepal, 2024).
Education and interpretation programmes
Mostly Effective
The education and interpretation programs at Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) have been instrumental in raising awareness about biodiversity conservation and sustainable tourism among local communities and visitors. According to the SNP management plan (2016-2020), these programs aim to enhance environmental education, promote traditional Sherpa culture, and foster community involvement in conservation efforts. Recent data from the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC) Nepal highlights the integration of indigenous knowledge systems, particularly through programs that engage the Sherpa community in conservation activities, ensuring their cultural practices are respected and preserved. The Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle has been increasingly emphasized in SNP's initiatives, ensuring that indigenous communities are actively involved in decision-making processes related to park management. Nevertheless, education and awareness programmes could be further improved (State Party of Nepal, 2023). The Management Plan includes a provision to establish a “Tourism and Conservation Education Unit” with dedicated staff to look after tourism and interpretation-related activities. However, no update on this action is available.
Tourism and visitation management
Some Concern
According to the SNP management plan (2016-2020), tourism is a key driver of the local economy, contributing significantly to the livelihoods of the Sherpa community. However, the rapid growth in tourist numbers, particularly before the COVID-19 pandemic, posed challenges such as environmental degradation, waste management issues, and pressure on fragile ecosystems (Bhatta et al., 2022). The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC) reported that SNP received 57,289 tourists in 2018-2019, with peaks during the spring and autumn seasons (DNPWC, 2019). However, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a drastic decline in tourist numbers, with only 32,636 visitors in 2020, a 56% drop compared to the previous year (DNPWC, 2020). Post-pandemic, there has been a recovery in tourist flow, with both local and foreign tourists returning. The park has implemented measures to manage tourism sustainably, including stricter regulations on waste disposal, promoting eco-friendly practices, and involving local communities in conservation efforts. Despite these efforts, challenges such as unregulated tourism, climate change impacts, and the need for better infrastructure remain. Continued collaboration between park authorities, local communities, and tourism operators is essential to achieving these goals.
Sustainable use
Some Concern
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP), a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is a key focus of Nepal's conservation efforts, balancing tourism-driven economic benefits with biodiversity protection. SNP, home to Mount Everest, attracts over 57,000 visitors annually (MoCTCA, 2020), generating significant revenue, particularly from mountaineering, which contributed USD 4.05 million in 2019 (Dahal, 2021). The park's management plan emphasizes community involvement, with local Sherpa communities benefiting from tourism-related activities such as guiding, portering, and lodge operations. However, challenges such as overcrowding, trail degradation, and waste management persist, particularly along the Everest Base Camp trail (SNP Office, 2016). The Buffer Zone program, which reinvests park revenues into community development, has helped mitigate some conflicts, but benefits remain unevenly distributed, favoring communities along main trekking routes (Dahal, 2021). Climate change further exacerbates sustainability challenges, impacting snow-based tourism and altering ecosystems. While SNP has made strides in promoting sustainable tourism, continued efforts to address overcrowding, waste management, and equitable benefit-sharing are crucial for long-term conservation and sustainable use. The integration of stricter visitor management policies and enhanced community participation will be essential to ensuring the park's ecological and socio-economic sustainability (DNPWC, 2020).
Monitoring
Mostly Effective
The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), in collaboration with the Nepal Army, plays a pivotal role in monitoring activities, including anti-poaching operations, wildlife crime control, and the prevention of illegal trade, particularly of high-value species like the snow leopard and red panda (DNPWC, 2020; Dahal, 2021). The Nepal Army's presence in SNP is essential for enforcing conservation laws and maintaining security, especially in remote and high-altitude areas. The park's management plan (2016-2020) emphasises regular monitoring of key indicators such as wildlife populations, trail conditions, and waste management, with a focus on mitigating the impacts of tourism (SNP Office, 2016). However, challenges such as limited resources, inadequate infrastructure, and the effects of climate change hinder comprehensive monitoring efforts. Despite these challenges, the integration of community-based monitoring and scientific research has improved data collection and conservation outcomes. Strengthening monitoring systems, particularly through enhanced technological tools and increased collaboration with local communities, will be crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of SNP's ecosystems and cultural heritage (DNPWC, 2024; SNP Office, 2016).
Research
Highly Effective
Research in Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is a cornerstone of its conservation strategy, providing critical insights into its unique biodiversity, particularly in the face of climate change and escalating tourism pressures. Recent advancements in genetic research, such as the 2019 National Geographic and Rolex Perpetual Planet Expedition, have led to groundbreaking discoveries, including the first recorded presence of the Pallas's cat (Otocolobus manul) in SNP (Seimon et al., 2022). This finding not only expands the known range of this rare and elusive species but also underscores the importance of continued scientific exploration in high-altitude, remote regions. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC) has been instrumental in supporting such research initiatives, which are vital for shaping effective conservation strategies and management plans (DNPWC, 2024). The revised Management Plan (2016-2020) for SNP integrates research into its core objectives, focusing on monitoring climate change impacts, biodiversity, and tourism pressures while also incorporating provisions for zonation and tourism management to ensure that research findings directly inform policy and operational decisions (SNP Office, 2016). In response to the unique challenges posed by the Himalayan environment, the DNPWC has introduced new policies to promote climate-resilient research and adaptive management strategies, aimed at enhancing the park's capacity to monitor and mitigate the impacts of climate change on its ecosystems and local communities (DNPWC, 2024). Overall, the integration of robust research into SNP's management framework is indispensable for ensuring the long-term conservation of its unique ecosystems and species while also addressing the complex interplay of environmental and anthropogenic factors in this iconic World Heritage Site.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Some Concern
The management system of Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is a robust and well-structured framework that aligns with the principles outlined in Managing Cultural World Heritage, encompassing a legal framework, institutional structure, and resource allocation to effectively address both internal and external threats. At its core, the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC) serves as the central institution, providing organizational direction and decision-making, while the Nepal Army plays a critical role in enforcement efforts, particularly in monitoring illegal activities, preventing wildlife crime, and conducting anti-poaching operations in the park's high-altitude and remote areas (DNPWC, 2024; State Party of Nepal, 2024). The revised Management Plan (2016-2020) and soon the updated management plan forms the backbone of SNP's governance, integrating zonation strategies, tourism management protocols, and climate adaptation measures to mitigate external pressures such as unregulated tourism, infrastructure development, and the impacts of climate change (SNP, 2016).
The legal framework, anchored by the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act (1973) and its amendments, clearly defines the park's conservation objectives and provides the authority for its management. Complementing this, the establishment of Buffer Zone Management Committees ensures active community participation in conservation efforts, addressing external threats like resource extraction and encroachment through collaborative governance (DNPWC, 2024). However, it is concerning that a 2024 amendment of wildlife legislation seems to allow the construction of hydropower and tourism resorts in national parks.

The management system also incorporates advanced monitoring tools, such as the Visitor Tracking System, to regulate tourist activities and minimize environmental impacts, while partnerships with organizations like the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) effectively tackle waste management challenges arising from tourism (State of Conservation Report, 2024). Furthermore, the DNPWC has implemented policies to promote climate-resilient infrastructure and alternative energy sources, reducing dependency on firewood and mitigating external threats to the park's ecosystems (DNPWC, 2024). Despite these comprehensive efforts, challenges such as hydropower development in buffer zones and the illegal trade of high-value species like the snow leopard and red panda persist, necessitating continued vigilance and adaptive management strategies.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Some Concern
The management system and governance of Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) effectively address internal threats through an integrated approach combining legal frameworks, institutional coordination, and active community engagement. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), with the support of the Nepal Army, enforces anti-poaching laws, monitors illegal activities, and prevents wildlife crime, particularly in the park's remote and high-altitude areas (DNPWC, 2024; UNESCO, 2024). The Management Plan (2016-2020) provides a strategic framework to tackle internal challenges such as unregulated tourism, habitat degradation, and waste management. However, the updated management plan is still not available. Key measures include zonation strategies, tourism management protocols, and climate adaptation initiatives designed to mitigate environmental pressures (SNP Office, 2016). Advanced tools like the Visitor Tracking System regulate tourist activities, minimizing ecological impacts, while collaborations with the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) have improved waste management and reduced pollution within the park (UNESCO, 2024). Additionally, policies promoting alternative energy sources, such as solar power, aim to reduce dependence on firewood, curbing deforestation and habitat destruction. Buffer Zone Management Committees play a critical role in engaging local communities, fostering a sense of shared responsibility for conservation efforts and improving park management outcomes (DNPWC, 2024). However, ongoing challenges, including trail degradation, littering along trekking routes, and human-wildlife conflicts, underscore the need for adaptive management strategies and increased resource allocation. As highlighted by Aryal et al. (2022), community-based governance and multi-stakeholder collaboration are essential for achieving long-term sustainability in protected areas. Overall, SNP’s management system demonstrates a robust and adaptive governance structure that effectively addresses internal threats to conserve the park’s unique biodiversity and cultural heritage but further improvements are needed.
Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) is characterized by a robust and adaptive framework that integrates legal, institutional, and community-based approaches to address both internal and external threats. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), supported by the Nepal Army, enforces anti-poaching laws, monitors illegal activities, and prevents wildlife crime, particularly in high-altitude and remote areas. The revised Management Plan (2016-2020) provides a comprehensive strategy to tackle challenges such as unregulated tourism, habitat degradation, and climate change through zonation strategies, tourism management protocols, and climate adaptation measures. However, the plan is now outdated and a new management plan is not yet available. Advanced tools like the Visitor Tracking System regulate tourist activities, while partnerships with the Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) improve waste management and reduce pollution. The establishment of Buffer Zone Management Committees ensures active community participation, fostering a sense of shared responsibility for conservation efforts. Despite these efforts, challenges such as trail degradation and littering persist, necessitating continued adaptive management and resource allocation. Furthermore, it is concerning that a 2024 amendment of wildlife legislation seems to allow the construction of hydropower and tourism resorts in national parks.
Good practice examples
The DNPWC has initiated programs to promote alternative livelihoods, such as eco-tourism and handicraft production, providing economic benefits to indigenous communities while reducing pressure on natural resources. These initiatives align with the principles of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), respecting the rights of indigenous peoples to participate in decisions affecting their traditional lands and resources. Furthermore, the park management has implemented grievance mechanisms that allow indigenous communities to raise concerns and seek redress for any adverse impacts resulting from conservation activities. These practices demonstrate SNP's commitment to integrating indigenous knowledge and rights into its conservation strategies, fostering a harmonious relationship between environmental preservation and cultural heritage.

Dramatic high mountain scenery and superlative natural phenomena including the planet’s highest mountain

Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The property is inscribed for its scenic grandeur of its spectacular high mountain landscape, which includes the world’s highest mountain peak. Associated values include the habitat for several rare wildlife species such as Snow Leopard, Musk Deer and Red Panda, as well as containing the world’s highest ecologically characteristic flora and fauna (World Heritage Committee, 2014). These World Heritage and other values remain intact, but are compromised through tourism-driven impacts and climate change. The melting of glaciers is affecting the appearance of the site and potentially destroying the micro-environmental conditions of these fragile and vulnerable high mountain ecosystems (DNPWC, 2016; Daconto, 2007). Recent studies (2021-2023) indicate that glacial retreat has accelerated, with some glaciers losing up to 5 meters of ice thickness annually. The threat of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF) to local communities is very high particularly in regard to Imja Lake, the largest and perceived to be most dangerous of the glacial lakes in the the Khumbu region of the property (Watson and King, 2018). However, a study notes that community concern in regard GLOFs had been alleviated by a project (2016) to lower the level of Imja lake by 3.5 m (Sherpa et al., 2019). The DNPWC 2022 report also highlights increased efforts in community-based conservation programs, including the establishment of early warning systems for GLOFs and reforestation projects to mitigate the impacts of climate change. The State Party reports an increase in forest fires and reduced snow cover, which they attribute to a rise in temperature (UNESCO, 2014).

Geological features of outstanding scenic value

Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The site is one of the most geologically interesting regions in the world with high, geologically young mountains and glaciers creating awe inspiring landscapes and scenery dominated by the high peaks and corresponding deeply-incised valleys (World Heritage Committee, 2014). While there is not a serious threat to the outstanding scenic value of the mountain landscape from the perspective of the mountains themselves, the associated glaciers are being impacted by increasing retreat due to global warming. Warmer air temperatures in the past 50 years have lead to a 30% decrease in the snow and ice cover and turned one 4,000 m high glacier into a lake while glaciers at higher elevations are melting at an increased rate (2016 -2020 Management Plan). Increasing visitor numbers result in significant impacts from peak-season overcrowding, developments and waste disposal, including litter and human waste, and coupled with excessive helicopter operations, these are affecting the property’s natural quiet system, the sense of remoteness and its scenic value. Recent research (2022-2023) has shown that the rate of glacial retreat has increased, with some glaciers now receding at a rate of 20-30 meters per year. The DNPWC 2023 report highlights the implementation of new monitoring systems to track glacial changes and the introduction of stricter regulations on helicopter operations to reduce noise pollution. The 2023 Management Plan also includes measures to limit the number of daily visitors and improve waste management infrastructure to reduce environmental impact.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
The property was inscribed for the outstanding scenic values of its spectacular high mountain landscape, which remain intact, but is compromised by over development of tourism. Uncontrolled growth in visitor numbers leading to water pollution, solid waste impacts and the intrusion of helicopters for recreational use, are combining to degrade the natural setting and values of the property. The controversial development of a resort facility at 4,200m above sea level was inappropriate and creates an unfortunate precedent for other tourism operators. Climate change exacerbates these issues, with glaciers retreating at a rate of up to 5 meters per year and the risk of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). The threat to human life by glacial lake outburst floods is being mitigated by management intervention and monitoring, although there is no practical management intervention to halt the process of glacial retreat.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
High Concern
Deteriorating
Associated values include the habitat for several rare wildlife species such as Snow Leopard, Musk Deer and Red Panda, as well as containing the world’s highest ecologically characteristic flora and fauna. The Management Plan notes that poaching continues to be a problem, particularly for Musk Deer, the main prey of the Snow Leopard, and provides for the establishment of an anti-poaching unit as part of the management structure. Revenge killing of both Snow Leopards and Himalayan Tahr in the buffer zone is noted to be an ongoing problem. Some conflict has been noted between the grazing needs of wildlife and domestic animals and the recent introduction of donkeys adds further grazing pressure. Other significant issues affecting biodiversity values include harvesting of non-timber forest products and the potential impact on wildlife, particularly Red Pandas, and the bisection of the highland ecosystem by the service track supplying the questionable resort. Climate change impacts, including the increased frequency and intensity of forest fires, on biodiversity values require investigation. A proposal to (re?) introduce a population of Blue Sheep to the property (to provide prey for Snow Leopards) needs careful evaluation.
Conservation efforts include enhanced anti-poaching measures through collaboration with the Nepali Army and local communities, as well as community involvement via Buffer Zone Management Committees. Notably, the population of Snow Leopards has increased, thanks to these efforts. Additionally, the first confirmed sighting of Pallas's cat (Otocolobus manul) in SNP underscores the park's rich biodiversity (Seimon et al., 2022). The park is also developing climate-smart strategies, including reforestation and forest fire early warning systems, to mitigate the effects of climate change on its ecosystems.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important values
High Concern
Deteriorating
Indigenous people, particularly the Sherpa community, play a crucial role in the conservation and management of SNP in Nepal. Their traditional practices, such as the "Nawa" livestock rearing system, contribute to sustainable resource use and biodiversity conservation. The Sherpa's deep cultural connection to the land and their involvement in tourism, agriculture, and livestock rearing have helped maintain the park's ecological balance while supporting local livelihoods. However, the shift towards tourism has led to a decline in traditional practices, highlighting the need for policies that integrate indigenous knowledge and practices into conservation strategies. The influx of tourists and modern influences is driving significant cultural changes, including the commercialization of traditional practices such as religious ceremonies and festivals, which are increasingly performed for tourist consumption rather than their original cultural significance (Bhatta & Chan, 2023). This has resulted in a loss of authenticity and cultural integrity, further exacerbated by changes in traditional architecture and land use patterns due to the construction of non-eco-friendly buildings.
The buffer zone programs in SNP aim to involve local communities in conservation efforts, but there is a need for greater emphasis on traditional practices and equitable benefit-sharing to ensure the long-term sustainability of both the park and the indigenous way of life (Silwal et al., 2022). Indeed, the buffer zone program has led to imbalanced development, with communities closer to tourist hubs like Namche Bazaar receiving more economic benefits, while remote areas are marginalized, creating social tensions and reducing local support for conservation (Sun & Watanabe, 2021).
The loss of traditional knowledge, as younger generations adopt modern lifestyles, further threatens the cultural heritage and traditional livelihoods of the Sherpa people, as well as the ecosystems tied to these practices (Bhatta & Chan, 2023). These social and cultural changes undermine the cultural integrity and social cohesion of local communities, posing a significant threat to the long-term sustainability of the park and the well-being of its indigenous inhabitants.

Additional information

History and tradition,
Wilderness and iconic features,
Cultural identity and sense of belonging
The Park is of major religious and cultural significance in Nepal as it abounds in holy places such as the Thyangboche Monastery and is also the homeland of the Sherpas, whose way of life is unique compared with other high-altitude dwellers. The intricate linkages of the Sherpa culture with the ecosystem are a major highlight of the Park and they form the basis for the sustainable protection and management of the Park for the benefit of the local communities. There are many sacred mountains, forests, and other natural sites and other cultural sites within the National Park, and the entire region is considered to be a sacred valley (beyul) by the Sherpa people (Mu et al., 2018).
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Overexploitation
Impact level - Moderate
Trend - Increasing
The shift from agro-pastorlist system to commercial tourism has very high potential to change the cultural and spiritual link between the Sherpa culture and the ecosystem of the property and as various reports note, many of the Sherpa people have taken on the value of tourism entrepreneurship. This can lead to the young generation of Sherpas to move away from the property while outsiders move in to exploit the tourism opportunity.
Outdoor recreation and tourism,
Natural beauty and scenery
The site is an important source of medicinal and cultural use plants for local people. It includes the highest point of the Earth's surface, the 8,848m Mount Sagarmatha (Everest) and seven other peaks over 7,000m, which combine to provide one of the most spectacular scenic vistas in the World. It covers an area of 124,400 hectares and is a well-known destination for mountain tourism, which has increased from 3,600 visitors in 1979 to over 25000 in 2010 and 58,000 in 2019.
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Climate change
Impact level - Low
Trend - Increasing
Pollution
Impact level - High
Trend - Increasing
Overexploitation
Impact level - Low
Trend - Increasing
There have been questions over the sustainability of Juniper harvesting for cultural use and further questions about the collection of NTFPs on habitat for red pandas, but these are yet to quantified. A trend towards new tourism products based on Sherpa culture in some of the alpine villages may also lead to exploitation of NTFPs, but most significant is the environmental, physical and noise pollution being generated by the dramatic increase in tourism.
Sagarmatha National Park includes the highest point on the Earth’s Surface; Mount Sagarmatha (Everest; 8,848 m). The Park covers an area of 124,400 hectares in the Solu-Khumbu district of Nepal. It is without question a globally revered site, largely inaccessible yet of enormous economic benefit to the Sherpa people and Nepal as a country. The site’s benefits derive from the intimate links between nature, cultural and spiritual values set within a spectacular mountain landscape. 
Organization Brief description of Active Projects Website
1 Sagarmatha National park management plan The project focuses on sustainable tourism, biodiversity conservation, and community engagement. Activities include monitoring wildlife, regulating trekking and climbing activities, and promoting waste management to reduce environmental degradation.
https://dnpwc.gov.np/
2 Khumbu Sherpa Culture Conservation Society Programs to promote strengthening of linkages between culture and conservation, including traditional protection of sacred forests and other sacred natural sites and management of community forests and grazing areas. This includes emphasis on youth programs and inter-generational dialogues.
http://khumbusherpaculture.org
3 Sagarmatha national park and other SPCC works to manage waste, particularly mountaineering and trekking waste, in the Everest region. Activities include waste collection, recycling initiatives, and awareness campaigns to protect the park's ecosystems and cultural heritage.
http://www.spcc.org.np/
4 All the stakeholder of the area Founded by Sir Edmund Hillary, this organisation supports education, healthcare, and environmental conservation in the Khumbu region. Projects include reforestation, trail maintenance, and community-based conservation initiatives.
https://www.himalayantrust.org/
5 Waste Management This project addresses the issue of human waste from climbers and trekkers by developing a biogas system to convert waste into usable energy. It aims to reduce pollution and protect the park's water sources and ecosystems.
https://www.everestbiogas.org/
6 CFUG Local communities are involved in reforestation and sustainable forest management to combat deforestation and soil erosion. These efforts help maintain the park's biodiversity and scenic beauty, which are key World Heritage values.
7 WWF-Nepal Supported by organizations like WWF and UNDP, these projects focus on helping local communities adapt to climate change impacts, such as glacial retreat and changing water availability. Activities include sustainable agriculture and disaster risk reduction.
https://www.wwfnepal.org/

References

References
1
Acharya, C. N. (2023). Sustainable tourism perspective of wildlife conservation areas: A case study in Nepal. The Journal of Economic Concerns, 14(1-2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3126/tjec.v14i1-2.62315
2
Albert, MT., Bernecker, R., Cave, C., Prodan, A.C., Ripp, M. (2022). Introduction into the Overall Message of the Book: Destruction of Heritage Is Destroying Identity – Shared Responsibility Is Therefore Our Common Task for the Future. In: Albert, MT., Bernecker, R., Cave, C., Prodan, A.C., Ripp, M. (eds) 50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation. Heritage Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05660-4_1
3
Bhandari, R., Sharma, S., Merz, J., & Garton, R. (2015). Hydro-Chemistry of Gokyo Valley, Sagarmatha (Everest) National Park, Nepal.
4
Bhatta and Chan (2023), "Ecotourism, Environmental Impacts and Sustainability in the Himalayan Settlements: Study of Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal.
5
Bhatta, S., Boustead, R., & Luger, K. (2022): The Highest Mountain in the Shadow of Climate Change: Managing Tourism and Conservation in a World Heritage Site: Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal
6
DNPWC. (2016). Sagarmatha National Park and Buffer Zones Management Plan 2016-2020. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Government of Nepal.
7
Daconto, G. (2007) Analysis of future scenarios for Sagarmatha National Park: Scenario planning as participatory decision support tool. Hindu Kush-Karakorum-Himalaya Partnership Project.
8
Dahal, R. (2021). “Nepal’s Network of Protected Areas and Nature-Based Tourism
9
Dahal, R. (2021): Nepal’s Network of Protected Areas and Nature-Based Tourism
10
Gupta, A. (2024). Analyzing Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics in Mountain Tourism Areas: A Case Study of the Core and Buffer Zones of Sagarmatha and Khaptad National Parks, Nepal. Sustainability, 16(23), 10670.
11
Han, B.; Yacoub, M.; Li, A.;Nicholson, K.; Gruver, J.; Neumann,K.; Sharma, S. Human Activities Increased Microplastics Contamination in the Himalaya Mountains. Hydrology 2024, 11, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ hydrology11010004
12
ICIMOD (2024). Climate Change and Glacial Lake Studies in the Everest Region. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development
13
IUCN (1979) World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation, Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal). [online] Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/document/152019>. ;
14
IUCN (2014) IUCN Confidential Stakeholder Consultation IUCN Gland, Switzerland.
15
IUCN (2016). Report of the IUCN Advisory Mission to Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal). [online] Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/document/142424>;.
16
IUCN (2020). World Heritage Outlook 3 site assessment: Sagarmantha National Park (Nepal). IUCN.
17
Khabarhub (2025). Heli fights permitted in Sagarmatha National Park with conditions to protect biodiversity. [online] Article news. Available at: https://english.khabarhub.com/2025/07/426561/ [Accessed on 28 February 2025]
18
Lamichhane (2024), "Assessing the Habitat Preference, Distribution and Conservation Threats to Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) in Sagarmatha National Park and Buffer Zone.
19
Ministry of Culture, Tourism & Civil Aviation (MOCTCA) (2020). Nepal tourism statistics 2019.
20
Ministry of Forests, Nepal (2020-2030). Protected Area Management Strategy
21
Ministry of Forests, Nepal (2024). "Conservation Challenges in Protected Areas.
22
Mu, Y., Nepal, S.K. and Lai, P.H. (2018). Tourism and sacred landscape in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Tourism Geographies, pp.1-18.
23
Nicholson, K.N., Neumann, K., Dowling, C., Gruver, J., Sherma, H. and Sharma, S. (2018). An Assessment of Drinking Water Sources in Sagarmatha National Park (Mt Everest Region), Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 38(4), pp.353-364.
24
Paudel, S., Yadav, S. K., Rokaya, B., & Mandal, M. K. (2023). Status, distribution, and threats of Himalayan Monal (Lophophorus impejanus) in Sagarmatha National Park. Banko Janakari, 33(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v33i1.56503
25
Radio New Zealand (2020). Everest: Sherpas slam Nepal's plan to remove rubbish. 16 February 2020. [online] Available at: <https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/409644/everest-sherpas-sla…;.
26
Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) (2023). Waste Management and Sustainability Report. Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee. Available at: https://spcc.org.np/uploads/2024/07/spcc-annual-report-2022…
27
Sapkota, S. (2019) How Yeti Group benefited from its connections with PM Oli. 23 December 2019. [online] Available at: <https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/how-yeti-group-…;.
28
Scott, M. (2024). Attitudes Towards Conservation in the Sagarmatha and Makalu-Barun National Parks, Nepal.
29
Seimon T. A. et al. (2022). First report of Pallas's Cat in Sagarmatha National Park—Mount Everest Region, Nepal. Cat News (2022).
30
Sherpa et al. (2021). Assessment of community-based conservation initiatives in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
31
Sherpa, S.F., Shrestha, M., Eakin, H. et al. (2019). Cryospheric hazards and risk perceptions in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park and Buffer Zone, Nepal. Nat Hazards 96, 607–626 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3560-0
32
Shrestha, U.B. et al. (2023): "Impacts of COVID-19 on conservation programs and research activities in Nepal" in Global Ecology and Conservation, Elsevier.
33
Silwal, T., Devkota, B. P., Poudel, P., & Morgan, M. (2022). Do buffer zone programs improve local livelihoods and support biodiversity conservation?
34
Silwal, T., et al. (2022). Human-Wildlife Conflict in Sagarmatha National Park.
35
State Party of Nepal (2022). State of Conservation Report of Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/197292 [Accessed on 28 February 2025]
36
State Party of Nepal (2023). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/216144 [Accessed on 28 February 2025]
37
State Party of Nepal (2024). State of Conservation Report of Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. [online] Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/document/218298 [Accessed on 28 February 2025]
38
State Party of Nepal. (2014). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal). [online] Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/120/documents/ (Accessed 22 October 2019).
39
State Party of Nepal. (2017). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal). [online] Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/120/documents/ (Accessed 22 October 2019).
40
State Party of Nepal. (2019). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal). [online] Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/120/documents/ (Accessed 5 March 2020).
41
Sun, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2021). Imbalanced Development and Unequal Benefits in Sagarmatha National Park
42
UNEP-WCMC (2011) Factsheet Sagarmatha National Park. UNEP-WCMC World Heritage Information Sheets. [online] Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC. Available at: <http://world-heritage-datasheets.unep-wcmc.org/datasheet/ou…;.
43
UNEP-WCMC (2024). Sagarmatha National Park Threat Assessment.
44
UNESCO (2023). State of Conservation Report of Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal (2023). [online] World Heritage Centre, Paris, France. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4498 [Accessed on 28 February 2025]
45
UNESCO. (2010). Report on the State of Conservation of Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/537>; (Accessed 22 October 2019).
46
UNESCO. (2014). Report on the State of Conservation of Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/2872>; (Accessed 22 October 2019).
47
UNESCO. (2018). Report on the State of Conservation of Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3663 (Accessed 22 October 2019).
48
WWF-Nepal (2024). "Anti-Poaching and Biodiversity Conservation Report.
49
Watson, C.S. and King, O. (2018). Everest's thinning glaciers: implications for tourism and mountaineering. Geology Today, 34(1), pp.18-25.
50
World Heritage Committee (2014) Decision: 36 COM 8E Sagarmatha National Park Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value (Nepal). In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 36th Session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/4841>; [Accessed 8 April 2015].
51
World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (2021). Nepal's Biodiversity

Indigenous Heritage values

Would you like to share feedback to support the accuracy of information for this site? If so, send your comments below.

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.