Tasmanian Wilderness

Country
Australia
Inscribed in
1989
Criteria
(iii)
(iv)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
In a region that has been subjected to severe glaciation, these parks and reserves, with their steep gorges, covering an area of over 1 million ha, constitute one of the last expanses of temperate rainforest in the world. Remains found in limestone caves attest to the human occupation of the area for more than 20,000 years. © UNESCO
© IUCN/Tilman Jaeger

Summary

2025 Conservation Outlook

Finalised on
11 Oct 2025
Good with some concerns
The remoteness and difficulty of access provide the greatest protection for this site. There continues to be competing land and resource interests along the boundaries of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage site that are incompatible with the OUV of the site. The site benefits from active management and from secure ongoing resourcing from both the State Party and the Tasmanian government, but increased funding for monitoring, research and increased management of biosecurity risks and threats would help future-proof the site against increasing threats. Climate change is an overarching concern and poses significant threats to ancient (and other significant) life forms and landscapes that have been created, modified and managed by long term Aboriginal fire management and that form some of the key attributes of the World Heritage site. While most of the 20 recommendations of the 2015 joint ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission have been the implemented, several recommendations are yet to be fully implemented, including the designation of Permanent Timber Production Zone Land (PTPZL) and Future Potential Production Forest Land (FPPFL) within the property as reserves. In recent years increased efforts have been made to better understand and collaborate with the Tasmanian Aboriginal community on the management of values, but this is only the beginning of what is truly needed for adequate consultation and representation in the management of the site.

Current state and trend of VALUES

High Concern
Although the Tasmanian Wilderness is a vast and for the most part intact area which has conserved most of the specific conservation values for which it was inscribed on the World Heritage List, a number of threatening processes are causing the deterioration of some of its World Heritage values, including erosion of some landform features and resultant downstream sedimentation, and the risk of the extinction in the wild of several species (the Maugean Skate, the Orange-bellied Parrot, alpine skinks and freshwater fish such as Galaxia spp.), although most others are not at risk in the TWWHA. Other key species facing major challenges include the alpine vegetation (such as iconic conifers - pencil pine and king billy pine), and riverine rainforest (including prodigiously long-lived Huon pine). Landscape-scale fires caused by climate change constitute a major threat to many of the site’s ancient and other significant life forms along with landscapes created, modified and managed by Aboriginal people through the use of fire. Some landscape and wilderness values, ecological processes, and geodiversity values have also declined in parts of the site since inscription.

Overall THREATS

High Threat
There are several current and potential threats in the Tasmanian Wilderness, the cumulative impacts of which are of significant concern. Especially the direct and indirect impacts of observable and anticipated climate change, including increases in fire frequency and intensity is significant and may enhance other threats like pathogens, invasive alien species and fire occurrence. If the current trend of landscape-scale fires of increasing frequency and intensity continues, permanent damage to some of the site’s key attributes (ancient landforms, endemic species, alpine vegetation, landscapes containing Aboriginal cultural values) is inevitable. Biosecurity risks are well-documented for the past and present - and expected in the future - in terms of invasive alien species of both flora and fauna and less conspicuous yet at least equally problematic fungi and other pathogens. Given the number of these pathogens, pests and feral species, more work to slow the introduction or spread of avoidable biological threats is warranted. Issues with pollution in Macquarie Harbour and its impact on the Maugean skate and associated habitat are of great concern but management responses are showing some positive results. There is potential for the localised loss of wilderness character and other values including Aboriginal cultural values due to the development of proposed tourism infrastructure in remote locations, if not managed carefully.

Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT

Mostly Effective
The management of the site is undertaken professionally by the Tasmanian government and is helped by a high degree of natural protection due to the scale, location, limited infrastructure and harsh environmental conditions. Increasing threats however pose significant challenges for management. A Tourism Master Plan for the site is now in place which provides guidance on the constraints and opportunities for a range of tourism and related recreation experiences within the site. It is of concern that it does not enjoy the full support of key stakeholder and civil society groups. Ongoing concerns relate to pollution in Macquarie Harbour, and the process for tourism development proposals not having sufficient input from stakeholders potentially leading to inappropriate tourism that impacts on the undisturbed nature of the wilderness and the OUV of the site. These issues require further consideration by the Tasmanian government and the State Party. Additionally, education, staff capacity, boundary management and the meaningful engagement of Aboriginal people present aspects of some concern in the current protection and management. A positive development is that the statutory process for proclamation of FPPFL land within the Tasmanian Wilderness as reserves has been completed having successfully passed through both Tasmanian Houses of Parliament. This will result in a 2,850 hectares expansion of the existing Mole Creek Karst National Park, with a further 22,550 hectares of FPPFL to be reserved as either conservation area or regional reserve.

Full assessment

Click the + and - signs to expand or collapse full accounts of information under each topic. You can also view the entire list of information by clicking Expand all on the top left.

Description of values

Undisturbed wilderness and spectacular landscapes

Criterion
(vii)
Geological and glacial events, climatic variation at the geological and landscape scales, and Aboriginal occupation and use have combined to produce extensive and varied wilderness landscapes of exceptional aesthetic importance abound. Important landscape features exemplifying the variety and beauty of the property include the rugged, tarn-embedded quartzite ranges, such as the Eastern Arthurs. The dramatic rampart of the Great Western Tiers, marks the northern and eastern bounds of the undulating alpine Central Plateau, where sand dunes with ancient pencil pines abut shallow lakes. Dark-watered estuaries, such as New River Lagoon, nestle below precipitous peaks. The wild and windy coast with its emerald marsupial lawns, and the bizarrely beautiful submarine ecosystems of Port Davey and Bathurst Harbour add to the aesthetic appeal of the property. The golds and greens of wind-moulded alpine and subalpine flora, extensive blankets of buttongrass moorlands and patches of dark green mossy rainforests cloaking southern slopes, contribute to its scenic diversity. Cave systems are ornamented by glow worms, wild rivers cut dramatically through quartzite ranges to calmer water below, and forests dominated by Mountain Ash, at 70-100 metres, dwarf the rainforest understorey below (WH Committee, 45COM 8E).

The majority of the world’s tallest flowering trees forming the largest patches of awe-inspiring very tall forests

Criterion
(vii)
Awe-inspiring, towering eucalyptus forests which include the largest and most intact known patches of temperate forest with average crown height of over 70 metres and among of the world’s tallest flowering trees over 90 metres in height (DPIPWE, 2018). Additionally, the World Heritage site contains a significant part of Australia’s remaining cool temperate rain forest (IUCN and ICOMOS, 2015; State Party of Australia, 2010).

Exceptional expression, diversity and scale of karst features going back up to 400 million years

Criterion
(viii)
The property contains globally outstanding exemplars of ongoing temperate maritime karst processes, unusually within dolomite. Palaeokarst, much resulting from the unusual interaction of glacial and karst processes in a maritime climate, provides one of the best available global records of southern temperate glacial processes, with deposits from three eras: the late Cenozoic, late Paleozoic and late Proterozoic (WH Committee, 45COM 8E).

Exceptionally broad range of geological and geomorphological phenomena and processes

Criterion
(viii)
Extensive outcrops of Jurassic dolerite attest to the breakup of Gondwana more than 40 million years ago. Large areas of terrace systems, stabilized by a peat coating, provide evidence of tectonic and sea level change. Vast areas of wilderness and wild coasts, free of exotic plants, allow fluvial, aeolian and wave-driven processes to continue. Periglacial processes, globally unusual because of the absence of permafrost, actively create stone stripes, polygons and steps. Globally distinct wind-controlled striped mires are the product of ongoing bio-geomorphological processes, as are the peat pond systems. The accumulation of organic matter continues at a landscape scale in nutrient-poor quartzite country, where globally distinct, reddish fibric moor peats occur at depth under rainforest (WH Committee, 45COM 8E).

Ongoing ecological processes with high degree of naturalness at a large-scale

Criterion
(ix)
The property’s great size and wilderness character enable significant natural, biological and geomorphological processes to continue in terrestrial, coastal, riverine and mountain ecosystems. The property is exceptional in its representation of ongoing terrestrial ecological processes involving fire and wind. Mosaic landscapes of fire-susceptible and fire-dependent plant communities have formed. These include large, remote, undisturbed areas of Mountain Ash, one of the tallest flowering plants in the world. At alpine altitudes, where wind redistributes sporadic snowfalls, cushion plants, exposed to wind and ice abrasion, thrive. Distinct plant communities, including the only Australian winter deciduous tree, the Deciduous Beech (also known as Tanglefoot), form on fire and weather protected north-eastern slopes. Wind-controlled cyclic succession in lineated Sphagnum mires appears to be globally unique. Unusual assemblages of deep marine species are found within the large estuaries, where communities are moderated by dark tannic freshwater, overlaying salt. (WH Committee, 45COM 8E).

Unique diversity of ancient taxa

Criterion
(ix)
A unique diversity of ancient taxa, particularly relict groups with ancestry dating back to the super continent of Gondwana (State Party of Australia, 2010) can be found in the site e.g. the dragonflies, the Tasmanian Redspot (Archipetalia auriculata) and the Tasmanian Spotwing (Synthemiopsis gomphomacromioides) are both the only known species in their genera and both appear to be relics of early dragonfly evolution that occurred in Antarctica at least 140 million years ago (Carle 1995, 1996). The mountain shrimps (Anaspides spp.) have been regarded as living fossils owing to minimal morphological change since the Triassic, and potentially representing how the original eumalacostracan looked and provide insights into the origins and phylogeny of Malacostracan crustaceans (Grams and Richter 2021).

High plant biodiversity with exceptional proportion of relict and endemic species

Criterion
(x)
The site contains an exceptional representation of relict and endemic plant species (398 vascular plants; Balmer pers. comm. 2025) including 29 palaeoendemic vascular plant clades, 22 entirely restricted to Tasmania (Jordan et al. 2016). Among the species in these clades 42 are restricted to Tasmania and are well represented in the TWWHA including the conifers Athrotaxis, Diselma, Lagarostrobos, Microcachrys and Pherosphaera hookeriana, and the angiosperms Agastachys, Anopterus glandulosus, Bellendena, Campynema, Cenarrhenes, Cyathodes, Dracophyllum milliganii, Isophysis, Milligania, Nothofagus gunnii, Orites milliganii, Orites diversifolius, Planocarpa, Pseudopanax gunnii, Prionotes, Tetracarpaea and Winifredia. There are also many other endemic species present (e.g. Anodopetalum, Eucryphia and Lomatia). The King’s lomatia (Lomatia tasmanica) appears to have been in existence as a sterile triploid clone for at least 43,000 years, making it one of the oldest documented vascular plant clones in the world (Parks and Wildlife Service, 2004). The property also conserves many other threatened and endemic plant species as well as unique ecosystems, including the coniferous rainforests, tall eucalypt forest with rainforest understoreys, buttongrass moorlands, sclerophyllous and other distinctive forms of alpine vegetation, all with high rates of endemic biota. Some of the longest-lived trees in the world are present, with Huon pines reaching ages in excess of 2000 years. The largest extent of endemic Mt Mawson Pine (Pherosphaera hookeriana) has been included with 2013 extension to include Mt Field National Park (UNEP-WCMC, 2012; State Party of Australia, 2013, 2010 and 1982; WH Committee, 45 COM 8E).

Relict and endemic mammals

Criterion
(x)
Endemic mammals include the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii, Endangered); Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus, Endangered), rufous-bellied pademelon (Thylogale billardierii), swamp antechinus (Antechinus swainsonii) and long-tailed mouse (Pseudomys higginsi). Examples of relict mammals include the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), and short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) (UNEP-WCMC, 2012; State Party of Australia, 2010 and 1982). Furthermore, there are recovering populations of threatened (under Tasmanian legislation) long-nosed fur seal, subantarctic fur seal and southern elephant seal returning to islands in the south west after they were extirpated by sealers in the 1800s (IUCN Consultation, 2025).

Rare, relict and endemic birds

Criterion
(x)
11 of the 135 native bird species recorded in the World Heritage site are endemic to Tasmania (Driessen and Mallick, 2003) as well as two endangered breeding endemics (Orange-bellied parrot and swift parrot). The Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax fleayi - Australia’s biggest bird of prey) is an endangered subspecies endemic to the island (UNEP-WCMC, 2012; State Party of Australia, 2010 and 1982). Other bird species include the critically endangered orange-bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster), which only breeds within the World Heritage site, and the ground parrot (Pezoporus wallicus leachii, LC). According to the management plan there are significant breeding populations of seabirds on remote islands off the south-west coast. They include two of only three breeding colonies of the threatened and endemic shy albatross (Thalassarche cauta). There are approximately five million other seabirds, dominated in number by short-tailed shearwaters (Ardenna tenuirostris) and fairy prions (Pachyptila turtur). Another notable species is the shy albatross (Thalassarche cauta). The islands are also important breeding sites for little penguins (Eudyptula minor) and the threatened soft-plumaged petrel (Pterodroma mollis) (IUCN Consultation, 2025).

Relict and endemic frogs

Criterion
(x)
Of the seven native frog species known to occur in the TWWHA, three are endemic to Tasmania. The endemic Tasmanian froglet (Crinia tasmaniensis), moss froglet (Crinia nimba), and Tasmanian tree frog (Litoria burrowsae) are believed to have Gondwanan origins (State Party of Australia, 2010 and 1982, UNEP-WCMC, 2012). The moss froglet (Crinia nimba) is an endemic frog discovered after inscription in 1992 and restricted to the southern part of the property (Hero et al., 2004). Most of the distributional range of the Tasmanian tree frog occurs within the World Heritage site.

Endemic and threatened reptiles

Criterion
(x)
Of the 14 native reptiles species occurring in the property, seven are endemic skinks including three alpine skinks, the mountain skink (Carinascincus orocryptus), northern snow skink (Carinascincus greeni), southern snow skink (Carinascincus microlepidotus) and the Pedra Branca skink (Carinascincus palfreymani, which is restricted to Pedra Branca Island which belongs to the property) (State Party of Australia, 2010 and 1982; Driessen and Mallick 2003). These species occur either entirely or primarily within the World Heritage site.
 

Endemic and threatened freshwater fish

Criterion
(x)
There are 16 recorded species of native freshwater fish within the property, including four endemic species. The Swamp Galaxias (Galaxias parvus, Vulnerable), Pedder Galaxias (Galaxias pedderensis, Endangered) and the Western Paragalaxias (Paragalaxias julianus) are restricted to the property and the distribution of the Clarence Galaxias (Galaxias johnstoni, Endangered) is primarily restricted to the property. The Pedder Galaxias was translocated from Lake Pedder to Lake Oberon within the property and is no longer believed to survive in Lake Pedder (Driessen and Mallick, 2003).

Enormous diversity of relict and endemic groups of invertebrates

Criterion
(x)
The site boasts an enormous diversity of relict and endemic invertebrates, including for example numerous velvet worms (Euperipatoides and Ooperipatellus spp.); harvestman (within the families Triaenonychidae and Neopilionidae, pseudoscorpions (Pseudotyrannochthoniidae) and the spider families Austrochilidae, Migidae and Orsolobidae, including the Tasmanian Cave Spider (Hickmania troglodytes); aquatic insect groups with close affinities to groups found in South America, New Zealand and Southern Africa (e.g. dragonflies, chironomid midges, stoneflies, mayflies and caddisflies); crustaceans (e.g. Anaspidesidae, Parastacidae, Phreatoicidae); primitive taxa showing links to fauna more ancient than Gondwana (e.g. Anaspidesidae, Trogloneta (a mysmenid spider); species in the genus Sabatinca of the primitive lepidopteran sub-order Zeugloptera) (DPIPWE, 2016, State Party of Australia, 2010; Giribet et al. 2016). Of the more diverse and better studied invertebrate groups, a number exhibit levels of Tasmanian endemicity in excess of 65%, many of which are entirely restricted to the property (Mallick and Driessen, 2005). Invertebrate taxa with high levels of Tasmanian endemism (>70% of species) and TWWHA endemism (>30% of species) include Amphipoda, Decapoda, Diplopoda, Gastropoda, Opilionida, Orthoptera, Plecoptera, Syncarida and Trichoptera.

Tracts of undisturbed peatlands and moorlands

Criterion
(ix)
The buttongrass moorlands of Tasmania are the best expression of a vegetation type with no close analogue outside Australia (Balmer et al., 2004). The extensive cover of these moorlands is a result of long term Aboriginal fire management regimes developed over thousands of years (Fletcher and Thomas 2007). The accumulation of peatlands and development of blanket bogs is a complex interaction between climatic, geomorphic and floristic variables (Sharples, 2003). The process of fire regimes shaping vegetation patterns is exemplified in buttongrass moorlands which provide habitat for a unique array of vertebrate and invertebrate fauna; they are an integral part to the unique beauty of the Tasmanian Wilderness (Balmer et al., 2004). The large number (and diversity) of burrowing crayfish and their burrows filled with highly acidic waters is globally unique.

Wild temperate coastline

Criterion
(vii)
The property contains the longest undisturbed stretch of temperate embayed rocky and sandy coastline in the world, with spectacular headlands, beaches, lagoons, islets and cliffs and a rugged windswept archipelago (State Party of Australia, 2010; Sharples, 2003).

Unusual assemblages of deep marine species are found within the large estuaries, where communities are moderated by dark tannic freshwater, overlaying salt

Criterion
(ix)
Port Davey is one of the world’s most anomalous estuarine ecosystems (Edgar et al. 2010). In the relatively sheltered shallow waters of the estuary, the darkened, nutrient poor, fresh water sits upon the clear, salt water of the sea. This phenomenon has resulted in bringing close to the surface a community of deep sea species, strongly depth-stratified benthic assemblages exhibiting high compositional variability over small spatial scales, a predominance of fragile sessile invertebrates, sponge spicule- and bryozoan-based sediments that are more characteristic of deep sea and polar environments, and has led to the evolution of numerous endemic species. One of these species is the Maugean skate, a demersal fish occurring at depths of 0–55 m and the only skate species restricted to brackish estuarine and almost fresh waters. This rare species has only been recorded in two isolated estuaries in south-western Tasmania, Macquarie Harbour and, to a lesser extent, Bathurst Harbour. However the status of the population in Bathurst Harbour has long been uncertain, with only four individuals ever caught from this location. The last sighting of Maugean skate in Bathurst Harbour was in 1992 and recent environmental-DNA analyses was inconclusive regarding whether the species is still extant in this area.
The Tasmanian Wilderness bears an exceptional testimony to the southernmost occupation by people during the Pleistocene period
The Tasmanian Wilderness is a mixed World Heritage site inscribed in recognition of its past and ongoing cultural and spiritual importance which are intricately linked to the natural environment. The site is also a cultural landscape, with the distribution of ecosystems reflecting millennia of engagement with the landscape by Tasmanian Aboriginal people.The Tasmanian Wilderness bears an exceptional testimony to the southernmost occupation by people during the Pleistocene period. Cave sites contain extremely rich, exceptionally well-preserved occupation deposits of bone and stone artefacts. Well preserved, diverse rock marking sites and rock shelter sites provide evidence of Aboriginal occupation, dating back approximately 40,000 years (WH Committee, 45COM 8E).

Assessment information

High Threat
There are several current threats, the most significant are the geomorphological and ecological consequences of anthropogenic climate change, uncontrolled bushfires at a landscape scale, species extinction, invasions of alien species, invasion and spread of pathogens, and loss of wilderness character due to proposed tourism developments in remote locations. Widespread threats include landscape-scale bushfires which have affected large parts of the World Heritage site, causing significant damage to some high-altitude areas. Climate change is responsible for a broad range of changes and increasing vulnerability of TWWHA values. There are also several other threats operating at either very localised levels or affecting specific attributes including the pollution from aquaculture and the spread of species-specific pathogens. The cumulative total of these threats is significant, particularly during a period of globally ubiquitous climate change. While the size and integrity of the World Heritage site, as well as the remoteness of vast parts of it, may well be the strongest factor in terms of its resilience, the current threats require strong management responses. The current and predicted impacts of climate change (a drying landscape and more frequent and intense bushfires at the hottest time of the year) present a serious threat to many of the site’s most charismatic attributes, such as ancient pines, alpine vegetation, riverine rainforest, buttongrass plains (many of which were created and managed by long term Aboriginal fire regimes) and extensive peatlands.
Pathogens
(Amphibian Chytrid Fungal Disease)
Invasive/problematic species
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
High Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
The Chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) has dramatically affected amphibians across the world. There are four frog species in Tasmania at some risk of extinction from this pathogen (Skerratt et al. 2016). The World Heritage site is assumed to still be largely disease-free, although more data is required to inform and appropriately assess the risk to native species in the TWWHA (DPIPWE, 2021) and the current extent of spread is not known. Some reports indicate that since 2010 there is little spread of the fungus in the site and no decline in frog distribution has been detected since 2010 (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Spreading of Chytrid is known to be associated with human disturbance and the fungus is mainly moved by people (Allan et al., 2009; Pauza et al. 2010). Management plans to stop the fungus from affecting frogs in the site are in place, but with increasing movement of people within the site, including in the most remote parts of the site, the risk is increasing and challenges remain in implementation. Initial chytrid research within the World Heritage site has shown that where chytrid is present the concentration of zoospores is very low suggesting that some characteristics of the site, such as low pH, may be restricting the impact of this disease on frogs in the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Pathogens
(Psittacine Circoviral Disease)
Other invasive species names
Psittacine circoviral disease (PCD)
High Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Psittacine Circoviral Disease is present in wild and captive populations of the Critically Endangered orange-bellied parrot. The disease is highly transmissible and can accumulate in the environment. The disease has been known to result in morbidity and mortality of nestlings and adult birds in captivity and in the wild. There have been no recent outbreaks or significant mortality in the wild population, with the last outbreak resulting in significant mortality occurring in 2014/15 (IUCN Consultation, 2024). The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Biosecurity Strategy 2021-2031(DPIPWE 2021) provides a high-level strategy to guide decision making and provide direction on minimising the risks and impacts of invasive diseases on the natural and cultural values of the TWWHA, and highlights the need for monitoring and evaluation to allow for evidence-based adaptive management.
Pathogens
(Plant pathogens)
Invasive/problematic species
Phytophthora cinnamomi
Austropuccinia psidii
High Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Plant diseases and dieback, especially Phytophthora dieback caused by the root pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi pose a major threat to the plant communities of the World Heritage area. Phytophthora cinnamomi was previously restricted to hiking trails, but increasing road access due to logging and mining operations in the proximity to the World Heritage site open up more pathways to this fungus and numerous other organisms into wilderness areas (IUCN and ICOMOS, 2015; HVEC, 2007; 2009; SWST, 2008; Hitchcock, 2008; Law, 2009). In 2010 a significant new infestation was detected on the Loddon Plains and trial stream monitoring was conducted on the boundary for Phytophthora species. A Tasmanian Phytophthora cinnamomi management plan is in place to mitigate the risk of further spread and management of the pathogen (State Party of Australia, 2015). In 2018, Phytophthora cinnamomi infections were reported affecting alpine communities on Mt Read at over 1000m altitude. Although outside of the World Heritage site, this is a significant increase in altitudinal limit for this pathogen (potentially linked to climate change), which increases the risk posed in the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive alien plants)
Invasive/problematic species
Salix fragilis
Ammophila arenaria
Rubus fruticosus
Carduus tenuiflorus
Other invasive species names
Euphorbia paralius
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
A volunteer led and government supported campaign to control species threatening coastal geomorphic and ecological processes (marram grass (Ammophila arenaria) and sea spurge (Euphorbia paralius) has achieved major results in managing and eradicating both invasives, such that it now requires only annual removal of sporadic invaders (although due to the highly invasive nature of these species, each could re-establish quickly without an ongoing control effort). The program has undertaken over 8,500 days work to remove 14.4 million sea spurge plants and has achieved approximately a 99 per cent reduction in sea spurge plants and a 98 per cent reduction in marram grass clumps (Wildcare, 2023). Should volunteer control efforts cease, the threat rating from sea spurge and its potential impact on the coastal values of the TWWHA may result in a high threat rating in the future.

Inland weed species such as blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) are mostly a problem in areas of mechanical or natural disturbance such as roadsides and river banks and are highly sporadic in their occurrence (Parks and Wildlife Service, 1999). Exotics reported as spreading include gorse (Ulex europaeus), ragwort (Senecio jacobaea), broom (Cytisus scoparius), Canadian pond weed (Elodea canadensis) and holly (Ilex spp.) (Parks and Wildlife Service, 2004; Hitchcock, 2008). The level of impact of environmental weeds in the World Heritage site has increased as a result of there being more invasives now in the TWWHA than there were prior to the addition of the extension area in 2013, which incorporated some established weed issues into the site (Balmer et al., 2017). The Tasmanian State of the Environment report (TPC, 2024) analysed 38 declared weeds and found 14 are present in the World Heritage area with two having spread to the World Heritage area since 2009 (crack willow and slender thistle).

Apart from sea spurge and marram, there is a lack of data on occurrence however, the localised impacts on particular values may be significant.

Fire & Fire Management
(Fire and fire regimes)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Bushfires, especially ‘landscape-scale fires’ (i.e. fires that are not stopped by natural fire boundaries such as wet forest or major rivers) and peat fires are a significant threat. While fire is a key component of the natural ecology of the World Heritage site, evidence indicates that fire regimes are shifting (PWS, 2015). Lightning strikes now dominate (over 99% of area burnt) as a source of ignition of major bushfires within the World Heritage site. Concurrently, the occurrence of extremely dry and hot summers promotes the occurrence of large, intense fires that pose a severe threat to the site’s ancient life forms, most of which have limited capacity to regenerate after fire (PWS, 2015; Bowman et al. 2021; Bowman et al. 2022). Increased dryness and fires also pose a significant fire threat to the TWWHA’s extensive organic soils and their unique vegetation communities (Prior et al. 2024).

In response to the 2016 bushfires, the TWWHA Bushfire and Climate Change Research Project was launched. The project concluded that the site's values that are most threatened by an increase in fire frequency are fire-sensitive palaeoendemic species, alpine and rainforest ecosystems and organic soils and landforms (Press, 2016). In the summer of 2018/2019 lightning ignited fires burned 6% of the World Heritage site, of which 12.3% consisted of fire-sensitive vegetation, recognized as part of the Outstanding Universal Value of the site (State Party of Australia, 2019), much of which is unlikely to return to the burned sites in centuries, if at all. There was also a loss of some globally rare peat mounds (State Party of Australia, 2019). Management activities are now informed by a TWWHA Fire Management Plan for the World Heritage site (Tasmania Parks & Wildlife Service, 2022) and an Aboriginal Cultural Burning Policy (Tasmania Parks & Wildlife Service, 2023).

In 2025 dry lightning started several major bushfires in western Tasmania and burned across a diverse array of endemic vegetation — from coastal plains to rainforest and sub-alpine woodlands, mostly in areas adjoining the World Heritage area, but some 9,393 ha inside the TWWHA affected a major section of the popular Overland Track (IUCN Consultation, 2025).

Following a fire, especially one of high intensity, geomorphic process is typically accelerated, with active sheet erosion, debris flows and other mechanisms of degradation to be expected (Shakesby and Doerr, 2006).
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive alien animals)
Invasive/problematic species
Capra hircus
Dama dama
Vespula vulgaris
Vespula germanica
Bombus terrestris
Salmo trutta
Oryctolagus cuniculus
Felis catus
Apis mellifera
Dama dama
Other invasive species names
Sturna vulgaris, Petaurus notatus, Arion intermedis, Menura novaehollandiae
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Compared with the rest of Tasmania and Australia, the TWWHA is characterised by low diversity and abundance of invasive species. Notwithstanding, invasive alien animal species in many taxonomic groups are a significant and permanent threat to conservation values of the World Heritage site. The current management plan mentions 25 vertebrate and 45 invertebrate invasive alien species; however only some vertebrate and invertebrate species are widespread in the TWWHA: brown trout (Salmo trutta), common starling (Sturna vulgaris), superb lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae), European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), feral cat (Felis catus), Krefft’s Glider (Petaurus notatus), European wasp (Vespula germanica), honeybee (Apis mellifera), hedgehog slug (Arion intermedis) and the large earth bumblebee (Bombus terrestris). Fallow deer, which are restricted to parts of the Central Plateau region of the TWWHA, have increased their distribution and abundance (Cunningham et al., 2022) partly due to westward migration and partly due to TWWHA boundary extensions. Superb lyrebirds, introduced in the 1930s continue to spread west and north in the TWWHA, doubling their area of extent between 2010 and 2025 (IUCN Consultation, 2025).

Some of these species compete with native species for nesting sites, others alter native vegetation and a few predate threatened species. Efforts to eradicate invasive populations of animals are hindered by the rugged and remote nature of the TWWHA and the requirement for significant funding. Australian heritage grant funding enabled the aerial cull of fallow deer in 2023, 2024 and 2025 substantially reducing their population (PWS 2025). Early detections of New Zealand Screw Shells and Pacific Oysters on Port Davey enabled their eradication.
Pathogens
(Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease)
Other invasive species names
Devil facial tumour disease (DFTD)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
The outbreak of the lethal Devil Facial Tumour Disease in Tasmanian Devils has resulted in a population decline of over 75% in some parts of Tasmania. Difficulties in access has limited systematic monitoring for disease in the World Heritage site. However, camera monitoring in the TWWHA since 2020 indicates that devils occur widely within the World Heritage site and much of it remains free of the disease (Driessen et al. 2020, 2022, 2024a, 2024b; IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Recreational Activities
(Increasing tourism)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Increased tourism development, recreation and visitor activities and associated infrastructure risks impacting on the OUV of the site, however currently the threat level can be considered low. The use of boats to access remote areas and an increase in the frequency and size of commercial cruise operations, as well as boating and diving activities in the Port Davey, Bathurst Harbour region are known threats to OUV values (Parks and Wildlife Service, 2004; Birdlife Australia et al., 2017). Importantly, these activities and the associated infrastructure may also pose a threat to Aboriginal cultural values in the landscape if not appropriately managed. There are also known biosecurity risks (such as the spread of the introduced invasive freshwater algae Didymo/Rock Snot (Didymosphenia geminata) and impacts on natural values and wild character of the area from an increase in unplanned and therefore unhardened and/or inappropriate walking tracks associated with the increased visitation.

A 2021 Tourism Master Plan for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (DPIPWE 2021) was prepared providing guidance on the constraints and opportunities of increased use of the site.
Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Tourism infrastructure and recreation areas)
High Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Community concerns have been reported regarding the potential impacts of increasing development of tourism infrastructure and associated mechanised access on the OUV of the World Heritage site (Birdlife Australia et al, 2017; Wilderness Society, 2019; TNPA 2023). These concerns relate to proposals for infrastructure and increased visitor experiences well within the site, rather than in Visitor Service Zones on the margin of the World Heritage site. Previously concerns were raised about the 2016 rezoning of the World Heritage site to enlarge recreation and visitor service zones (Gogarty et al. 2018a). Situated just outside the site, the new Cradle Mountain Visitor Centre opened in 2020 and has proven to be a useful structure for managing increased tourist numbers and providing better education and interpretation for the area. Further development at the Cradle Mountain Visitor Centre is still in planning with the Tasmanian Office of the Coordinator-General working with an unknown bidder to extend the Gateway Village precinct including erection of a new building at the southern end of the site (OCG, 2025a). Additional tourism infrastructure to cater for increasing visitor numbers at Cradle Mountain have included an upgrade to the viewing platform next to Glacier Rock and the new Dove Lake viewing shelter, which opened in January 2023. Some criticism has focussed on the size and scale of the Dove Lake viewing shelter as being inappropriate for the site, while generally there has been a positive response to the introduction of a bus service transporting tourists from the Visitor Centre to Dove Lake, which has significantly reduced impact on the near surrounds of this high visitation area.

A proposal for cable car access to Dove Lake by the Tasmanian and Australian governments has existed for many years with some federal funding approved in 2018 but then withdrawn in 2023 by a later government. In December 2024 the Tasmanian government announced it still wanted to proceed with the proposal and requested new funding from the federal government (Premier of Tasmania 2024).

The use of helicopters for tourist access to the wilderness has been particularly strongly resisted (Gogarty et al. 2018b) with several proposals not given approval including through extensive legal battles, but with several others still under consideration (ABC News, 2024). The 2016 TWWHA Management Plan made provision for aircraft access on a sliding scale across management zones, with landings in the Wilderness Zone limited to those required for management purposes, and aircraft access prohibited or restricted in key recreational areas to avoid impacting the recreational experience sought by some visitors to those areas.

An Aircraft Access Policy was recommended as a high priority by the 2021 Tourism Master Plan to provide clarity on air access "opportunities" while ensuring the values are not compromised, however it has not yet been released.

The planning, assessment and approval processes for tourism and transport projects inside the World Heritage area is complex involving both the Tasmanian and local government, as well as the State Party. Currently several proposals supported by the Tasmanian government are still awaiting decisions from the federal Environment Minister. The decisions on tourism investment opportunities are undertaken by the Tasmanian government through an expression of interest (EOI) process that is managed by the Tasmanian Office of the Coordinator-General and assessed by an independent panel and if accepted need to undertake a Reserve Activity Assessment managed by the Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service.

It is critical to ensure that such processes carefully assess the temporal and spatial cumulative impacts on the OUV and allow for a clear mechanism for community stakeholder engagement. Any lack of transparency in the process, and the political nature of which projects are supported puts at risk future degradation of the OUV of the site. The EOI process has resulted in 28 tourism proposals being proposed and assessed; with 3 lease/licences signed, 7 approvals underway, 2 under assessment, 16 not approved, withdrawn or surrendered (CGA, 2025b).

The Tourism Master Plan for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area provides guidance on the constraints and opportunities for a range of tourism and related recreation experiences within the site (State Party of Australia, 2019) and was released in May 2021 (DPIPWE, 2021).

Logging, Harvesting & Controlling Trees
(Commercial logging)
Very Low Threat
Outside site
Through the adoption in 2016 of the statutory management plan for the World Heritage site, both levels of government committed to the entire World Heritage site being off limits to commercial logging, with the exception of the harvesting of a few plantations e.g. 'old' pine plantations, which will be followed by restoration (Australian Government, 2019).
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution
(Pollution from release of organic waste from adjacent fish farms)
High Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Approximately one third of Macquarie Harbour is included in the property. Macquarie Harbour supports the only known population of the Maugean skate (Zearaja maugeana), a cartilaginous fish listed as endangered under both the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and Tasmania’s Threatened Species Protection Act 1995. It is included in the 2023 Finalised Priority Assessment List for threatened species listing reassessment.

The Maugean skate's population is thought to have declined by almost 50% between 2014 and 2021, with the main threat to the species being degraded water quality (in particular low levels of dissolved oxygen) due primarily to marine finfish farming, compounded by hydro-electric damming and the impacts of climate change (DCCEEW 2025). Recent evidence indicates a high risk of extinction for the species in the near future in part due to substantially reduced levels of dissolved oxygen throughout Macquarie Harbour. There is a significant correlation between the reduction in dissolved oxygen levels and increases in salmonid aquaculture due to the bacterial degradation of organic material introduced into the water column from fish-feed and fish-waste (DCCEEW 2023).

Fish farms (Atlantic salmon) in Macquarie Harbour have generated effluent that has entered the waters of the World Heritage site and de-oxygenated benthic waters, impacting on the endangered Maugean skate (Kirkpatrick et al., 2019). There is substantial concern for the survival of the species in the wild under ongoing cumulative anthropogenic impacts on the habitat conditions within Macquarie Harbour, Tasmania – the location of the species’ last known viable population (DCCEEW 2023). The Tasmanian Government reported in the past that "there is evidence of deterioration in the environmental condition in Macquarie Harbour broadly, and also within the TWWHA region’ and identified finfish aquaculture as one of the drivers of environmental decline" (EPA, 2017).

Marine finfish farming practices occur outside the boundary of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage property. Marine finfish farming in Macquarie Harbour continues to be regulated by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania and the independent EPA. Tasmania’s regulatory framework since 2012 has adapted to respond to concerns related to water quality in Macquarie Harbour insofar as they can be impacted by fish farming. Management controls have been imposed on marine farming planning management by the EPA since early 2017 which has resulted in a significant reduction in farmed salmonids within Macquarie Harbour from the peak standing biomass in 2014-15 at over 20,000 tonnes to 9,500 tonnes in 2020. Further controls from September 2022 have included a shift from a biomass cap to a limit on Total Permissible Dissolved Nitrogen Output (TPDNO) as the mechanism to cap the amount of nitrogen entering the aquatic environment. In October 2023 statutory Environmental Standards for Tasmania Marine Finfish Farming under the Environmental Management and Pollution Control Act 1994 came into effect setting out the environmental management conditions that will be prescribed through environmental licences issued to marine finfish farmers, including the forthcoming benthic condition index which will provide a better assessment of seabed health around farms. In February 2025 the EPA Director provisionally approved a Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation Plan and Water Quality Monitoring Plan, as required under the environmental licences for the ten fish farming leases in Macquarie Harbour. Another action taken by the Tasmania Government is the banning of recreational gillnetting in Macquarie Harbour from November 2024. This activity was identified as a threat to the species through entanglement. In addition, improved monitoring of water flow releases from the Gordon Dam hydro power station has been progressed to inform the impact to the halocline and oxygenation of the harbour. The suite of controls on marine finfish farming and favourable oceanic recharge events may have contributed to improvements in environmental conditions in Macquarie Harbour. EPA monitoring of dissolved oxygen levels in the harbour indicate an upward trend and are within the range measured by the EPA from 1993 to 2010 at several locations (EPA Tasmania, 2024). Median dissolved oxygen levels across Macquarie Harbour are at their highest levels in more than a decade and higher than 2021 (EPA Tasmania, 2024b). Since January 2023 over 99 percent of seabed video surveys at 35 metre compliance sites, including those within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage area, are compliant with Environmental Licence Conditions (IUCN Consultation, 2025).

The University of Tasmania’s Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies has released a series of reports on its research into the Maugean skate population status (Moreno et al. 2025). The most recent report indicates that there are signs of recovery of the species as the capture of juveniles in 2022, 2023 and 2024 shows some recruitment success. The primary conclusion of the report is that the population appears to be recovering and that more robust sampling is required. A National Recovery Team for the Maugean skate has been jointly established. The Recovery Team includes representation from all stakeholder groups with a significant interest, or relevant technical expertise, in Maugean skate conservation planning. It provides expertise in environmental remediation, and in addressing potential impacts to the community. Using guidance from the Commonwealth Threatened Species Scientific Committee, as outlined in the approved Maugean Skate Conservation Advice, as well as the Tasmanian Government’s Maugean Skate Conservation Action Plan, the Recovery Team developed a Roadmap of Agreed Actions which prioritises key research and conservation management actions for recovery of the species, many of which are currently underway.
Recreational Activities, Other Human Disturbances
(Erosion)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
In the past extensive erosion on the Central Plateau occurred due to historic land use practices. Ongoing bank erosion on the middle Gordon River can be attributed to flow regulation for electricity generation, while the lower Gordon river is impacted by erosion by boat wave wake, as are several other southwestern estuarine rivers. Coastal erosion is occurring on south-west beaches and estuaries due to extreme climate events, which threaten geodiversity values and dependent natural and cultural values. Studies have been undertaken to assess erosion risk and to devise mitigation options (e.g. Storey and Comfort 2007; Eberhard et al., 2015, Bradbury, 2019). Revegetation of bare ground induced by grazing and burning on the Central Plateau occurred after the removal of stock but has ceased in recent decades (Kirkpatrick and Bridle, 2013), however an increase in extensive extreme bushfires in recent years has increased erosion risk.
Other Human Disturbances
(Unauthorised collection of specimens)
Data Deficient
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Darwin glass (formed by a large meteorite impact) is known to be collected for commercial gain. Other rare minerals are also known to have been collected, while fossils (e.g., thylacine bones) are a potential target. Surveillance is difficult and successful prosecution rare (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Ad hoc observations indicate that unauthorised scientific collecting has occurred in places, e.g. obvious holes defacing outcrop from which core samples have been taken. Casual souveniring is a related albeit relatively minor threat.
Changes in Physical & Chemical Regimes, Changes in Temperature Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Climate change)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Climate change is responsible for a broad range of changes and increasing vulnerability of TWWHA values (DPIPWE, 2021). Tasmania’s complex geography and climate has created biodiversity-rich ecological niches with high levels of endemism, and often relict species (DPIPWE, 2016). Increases in surface and water temperatures may push endemic species to their biophysical limits. Projected increases in temperature and changes to rainfall will likely change terrestrial vegetation structure. Changes in weather patterns and the increase in frequency and intensity of extreme events have dramatically increased the risk of and resulting impacts from landscape scale bushfires such as those which raged through Tasmania in early 2016 and 2018/2019. Fire-sensitive palaeoendemic species (and their associated fauna) - including Huon Pine, Pencil Pine and King Billy Pine, Pherosphaera hookeriana, Diselma archeri and deciduous beech have relictual distributions and are unable to survive fire or disperse and re-establish in the absence of long periods of favourable conditions. Populations of these species which are lost in fires such as those seen in 2016 and 2018/2019 should be considered as permanent losses which are likely irreversible without costly long term climate adaptation interventions. Changes in fire frequency and intensity have also resulted in extensive erosion and peat loss, with a particular concern in the Central Plateau and parts of Southwestern Tasmania, for example in the Davey River area. This process in in turn affects sediment transportation along watercourses. Increasing severity of fire seasons is recognised as the most immediate way climate change will impact natural values within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA). Many of the TWWHA ecosystems that contribute to the property’s outstanding natural values are sensitive to fire, including the alpine bogs and meadows, buttongrass plains and ancient rainforests. Dry lightning is lightning that is accompanied by relatively little rainfall. Lightning strikes have been identified as the primary ignition source for some recent large and damaging fires in the TWWHA (Styger et al. 2018). Fires started by lightning strikes in wilderness areas of TWWHA are difficult to identify and suppress due to their remoteness. Overall, the projected increase in variability of rainfall and incidence of drought may result in a further increase in the number of large fires that threaten many of the TWWHA’s natural values (CSIRO et al. 2022).

Changes in water availability, evapotranspiration and the prevalence of heat wave conditions will reduce the probability of eucalypts being able to attain giant tree/very tall forest status in future (DPIPWE 2018). The response of wet eucalypt forest to heatwave conditions has been shown to be a dramatic loss of productivity resulting in tip from carbon sink to carbon source (Wardlaw, 2024). Changes in precipitation, temperature and evaporation have been modelled and are expected to increase risk to the biota of the shallow alpine lakes of the Central Plateau (Davies and Driessen, 2025). Change in snow incidence on taller mountains has not yet been demonstrated to have changed, however snow has been decreasing at lower elevations (Kirkpatrick et al. 2017), which impacts specialist snow patch vegetation.

Furthermore, climate change may impact the Highland Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens listed as an endangered ecological community nationally. Increasingly areas of the community are being destroyed or damaged by fires, and the impacts of climate change are predicted to be greatest on the Central Plateau where most of the community occurs (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The TWWHA has the vast majority of Australia’s peatland known as Organosols (Minasny et al. 2023), which support globally exceptional ecosystems and the nation’s most significant terrestrial carbon sink (Isbell, 2021). The trend in soil condition is considered to be getting worse (Cotching, 2018; Cotching and Kidd, 2010; Grose, 2015) particularly in relation to progressive drying of sphagnum bog soils which is then in danger from increased fire frequency and magnitude, along with increased occurrence of dry lightning strikes (Earl et al. 2019).

In addition to coastal erosion, climate change is likely to include temperature rise, sea level rise, extreme weather events and flash flooding which are anticipated to affect rates and magnitudes of further change, including fluvial systems, alpine landforms, karst and in the extensive blanket bogs supporting buttongrass ecosystems. Climate change may also allow establishment of some weeds, pests and diseases currently absent from the property.

The cultural values of the TWWHA are vulnerable to coastal erosion, rockfalls and slumping impacting the integrity of the coastline, including coastal First Nations cultural heritage sites such as rock shelters, shell middens, rock markings, hut depressions, quarries and artefact scatters. Further work is required to fully assess the vulnerability of and risks to cultural values in the TWWHA associated with climate change (CSIRO et al. 2022). In addition to coastal erosion, climate change is likely to include temperature rise, sea level rise, extreme weather events and flash flooding which are anticipated to affect rates and magnitudes of further change, including fluvial systems, alpine landforms, karst and in the extensive blanket bogs supporting buttongrass ecosystems. In montane and subalpine areas, a change in fire regimes may reduce the range of fire-sensitive palaeoendemic trees - including Huon Pine, Pencil Pine and King Billy Pine and is likely to cause a significant decline in the populations of alpine fire-sensitive palaeoendemic species, such as Pherosphaera hookeriana, Diselma archeri and deciduous beech (CSIRO et al. 2022).

To respond to the challenge of the impacts of a changing climate, the Australian Government commissioned an updated climate vulnerability assessment of Australia’s World Heritage properties and a climate change toolkit (State Party of Australia, 2023). The current management plan fully recognizes the challenge (DPIPWE, 2016) and a TWWHA Natural Values Climate Change Adaptation Strategy has been developed (DPIPWE, 2021).
High Threat
Potential threats include the negative impacts from Myrtle Rust and Orange pore fungus (Favolaschia claudopus) on native species, both of which are spreading across Tasmania. Furthermore, there is a risk with climate change and increased movement of spores, that inevitably Myrtle Rust will find it's way in to the TWWHA. A strain of high pathogenicity avian influenza, known as H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, has spread rapidly around the world in the past few years, causing widespread disease and death in birds and other animals, including marine mammals. If it spreads to Tasmania, it will likely have significant consequences specifically for seabird and marine mammal populations. However, further information is needed to determine the impact on native species assemblages and understand potential future spread.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Myrtle rust)
Invasive/problematic species
Austropuccinia psidii
Other invasive species names
Myrtle rust (Puccinia psidii)
High Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Myrtle rust infects plants from the widespread plant family Myrtaceae and has been present in Tasmania since 2015 and climate suitability modelling suggests that western Tasmania is currently suitable for the pathogen to establish in native vegetation in the future (Berthon et al. 2018).
The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Biosecurity Strategy 2021-2031(DPIPWE 2021) provides a high-level strategy to guide decision making and provide direction on minimising the risks and impacts of invasive organisms on the natural and cultural values of the TWWHA and highlights the need for monitoring and evaluation to allow for evidence-based adaptive management. The Biosecurity Strategy includes a goal to address knowledge gaps and proposed the TWWHA Management Plan develop a dieback symptom description method for staff involved in monitoring flora, incorporating a decision tree for ascertaining the significance of dieback. The recent arrival of the disease in Tasmania means there is as yet no clear understanding of how far it will spread as a complete list of susceptible species is unknown. Furthermore, there is a risk with climate change and increased movement of spores, that inevitably this disease will find it's way in to the TWWHA. Under that scenario it is likely to lead to significant impacts on values and therefore the threat can be classified as high.
Pathogens
(Orange pore fungus (Favolaschia claudopus) )
Data Deficient
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Orange pore fungus (Favolaschia claudopus) is a wood rotting fungus which has in recent decades been one of the fastest spreading invasive species globally. In less than a decade it has spread across the north coast of Tasmania and down the northwest coast to Strahan. It invades rainforest and wet forest and rapidly becomes the dominant wood rotting fungus. Its impact of native species assemblages are largely unknown at this stage but are undoubtably significant (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Pathogens
(Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza )
High Threat
Outside site
A strain of high pathogenicity avian influenza, known as H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, has spread rapidly around the world in the past few years, causing widespread disease and death in birds and other animals, including marine mammals. If it spreads to Tasmania, it will likely have significant consequences specifically for seabird and marine mammal populations. The H5 strain of HPAI has not been detected in Tasmania, or Australia, but based on what has occurred worldwide, there is a high likelihood it will arrive, most likely via wild birds migrating from places where outbreaks continue to occur. It is not possible to stop infected wildlife entering Tasmania but Biosecurity Tasmania, part of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania (NRE Tas), is enforcing strict biosecurity laws at mailing centres, airports and ports to minimise the risk of humans introducing pests and diseases, including HPAI. NRE Tas is prepared for and practised in emergency animal disease response. The Department has coordinated and taken part in multiple local and national discussion exercises to test its preparedness. Furthermore a Tasmanian Avian Influenza Readiness and Response Plan (Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania, 2025) has been developed.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Some Concern
The TWWHA was listed because of its natural and cultural heritage based on it meeting four natural criteria and three cultural criteria – one of only two World Heritage properties globally to meet this many listing criteria. The listed cultural values of the TWWHA are Aboriginal cultural values and are the only cultural values recognised in the World Heritage listing of the TWWHA. Despite efforts to facilitate joint management in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA), joint management with Tasmanian Aboriginal people does not exist in Tasmania with respect to State reserved lands (DPAC, 2021). The Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania made a submission to the Tasmanian government in response to the proposed changes of Future Potential Production Forest Land (FPPFL) in the TWWHA as Conservation Area or Regional Reserve to create a new tenure, namely an Aboriginal National Park, a tenure which exists under State and Federal legislation in other jurisdictions, but not in Tasmania (ALCT, 2021). It was submitted that as well as the FPPFL, neighbouring Conservation Areas and Regional Reserves could be incorporated into a broader Aboriginal-owned kooparoona niara National Park, however this was not accepted. Government endorsed consultations by Professor Emerita Kate Warner with Tasmanian Aboriginal people heard that efforts to include Aboriginal people in management in the TWWHA have been tokenistic at best, and genuine joint management with the Aboriginal community does not exist in Tasmania with respect to State reserved lands (DPC, 2021).
Legal framework
Mostly Effective
The Australian government manages its obligations under the World Heritage Convention to ensure effective protection of World Heritage properties through the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The EPBC Act provides legal protection for Outstanding Universal Value by regulating actions occurring within, or outside, the World Heritage boundary. The largest landholder is the Tasmanian Government which provides protections for Tasmania's four largest national parks and several smaller areas of various other conservation land tenures under its jurisdiction.

The legal framework is complex due to the overlapping Australian, State and local government jurisdictions, diverse land tenure, large land area, and complex ecological and cultural values. In addition some of the land tenures exclude the legal applicability of the TWWHA Management Plan (Jaeger et al., 2015). The Management Plan does, however, apply to over 97% of the World Heritage site (DPIPWE, 2016). The Australian Government has the main constitutional power to implement international legal obligations, including the World Heritage Convention. The Australian government’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) applies to all Australian World Heritage sites and requires any proposals which could threaten the OUV of the site to be subject to statutory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The EPBC Act is presently under a 10 year review by an independent national panel. The statutory criteria in the 2016 TWWHA MP are used in the EIA process, however the Parks and Wildlife Service EIA (Reserve Activity Assessment) process itself is not statutory. The Tasmanian Government has introduced the Land Use Planning and Approvals Amendment (Major Projects) Act 2020, which provides for a statutory EIA process for assessing and approving large complex proposals, however this does not fetter the discretion of the Director of Parks and Wildlife or the need for assessment under the existing PWS EIA (RAA) processes (IUCN Consultation, 2020c). The legal and jurisdictional complexity of managing the TWWHA frequently generates (at times politicized) debate about the applicable legal framework. A recommendation by the 2015 Reactive Monitoring Mission (RMM) that some 35,000 ha of the World Heritage site currently classed as Future Potential Production Forest Land be converted to national park (IUCN, 2015) has been partially completed - areas of FPPF in TWWHA (approx. 25,300 ha) were reserved under the NCA in March 2023. The remaining areas of FPPF that are in the TWWHA (9,890 ha) are on HEC land, most of which is Freehold, and a portion of which is Vested in the Minister. The Threatened Species (TRE) and Species Survival Commission (SC) (TRE SC) has recently been informed that it is intended that this remaining FPPF land in TWWHA be converted to reserves under the NCA (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Governance arrangements
Mostly Effective
Cooperation between the State Party and the Tasmanian government is ongoing, with the Tasmanian government financially supported in its management of the site. For the past decade serious bushfires across the TWWHA have required a substantial increase in resources including in the use of Parks and Wildlife staff and Sustainable Timbers Tasmania staff in the overall management of these fires. Improved coordination between the Parks and Wildlife Service, Sustainable Timbers Tasmania and the Tasmanian Fire Service has been critical in managing these fires to reduce damage to the site as well as neighbouring properties. Nevertheless, community and Aboriginal involvement in decision-making processes could be further strengthened.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Mostly Effective
The site is part of Australia's National Reserve System (NRS), with all public lands managed by the Tasmanian Government, and also includes several private reserves.
PWS has acted to integrate its activities in the World Heritage site with those of adjoining landowners. The current Management Plan acknowledges that there are sharp borders between the World Heritage site and private land, the length of which has significantly increased due to the 2013 Minor Boundary Modification. According to the most recent Reactive Monitoring Mission report, related problems include ease of access around the perimiter for those intending to undertake unlawful activites, fire, biosecurity and crop damage from wildlife. The same source otherwise suggests the direct borders between the World Heritage site and Permanent Timber Production Zone Land (PTPZL) are problematic due to the use of chemicals in managed forests and plantations, hybridization risks and colonization by non-native plantation species (Jaeger et al., 2015). Progress is being made in classing areas of the site as national park - Areas of FPPF in TWWHA (approx. 25,300 ha) were reserved under the NCA in March 2023. The remaining areas of FPPF that are in the TWWHA (9,890 ha) are on HEC land, most of which is Freehold, and a portion of which is Vested in the Minister.  The TRE SC has recently been informed that it is intended that this remaining FPPF land in TWWHA be converted to reserves under the NCA (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Boundaries
Mostly Effective
The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (the TWWHA) has undergone a series of extensions since its initial listing in 1982 to a total of 1.58 million hectare. The first major extension occurred in 1989, followed by a series of smaller extensions in 2010, 2012 and 2013. The boundary of the site (and the designation of areas within the site) has been a highly political issue surrounding what areas should be allocated for potential or existing mineral or forest resources (and in the past hydro-electric power development potential). The resultant boundary includes the majority of important natural and cultural heritage values but some areas with similar values are excluded because of future potential mining or timber production. For instance, further areas within the Southwest Conservation Area (also known as the Spero – Wanderer region) also contain values of potentially global significance. This is a vast tract of wild country south of Macquarie Harbour and west of the current boundary that is not included in the TWWHA. The area is managed by the Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service, but its current tenure means that mineral exploration and mining are permitted subject to the relevant approval process. Currently there is no agreed proposal for adding this part of the Southwest Conservation Area to the World Heritage Area.
Overlapping international designations
Data Deficient
No overlaps
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Some Concern
WHC Decision 44 COM 7B.75 (2021) welcomed the further progress with the implementation of the recommendations of the 2015 joint ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission, but noted that some of these recommendations remain to be fully implemented, and reiterated its request to the State Party to finalize, as a matter of priority, the on-going process to designate Permanent Timber Production Zone Land (PTPZL) and Future Potential Production Forest Land (FPPFL) within the property as reserves. This relates to a
range of recommendations regarding the management
of the property, including some related to tenure. The process for proclamation of FPPFL land within the Tasmanian Wilderness as reserves is now in the final stages of the required statutory process and has passed both Tasmanian Houses of Parliament. This will result in a 2,850 hectares expansion of the existing Mole Creek Karst National Park, with a further 22,550 hectares of FPPFL to be reserved as either conservation area or regional reserve (State Party of Australia, 2023). At this time, it is unclear what will happen to 942ha classified as permanent timber production zone land (PTPZL) set aside in 2014 to finalise harvesting and thinning of relevant plantation areas and is now under regeneration to native forest but is yet to be reserved under the Nature Conservation Act.
Climate action
Mostly Effective
The Tasmanian government has produced a TWWHA Natural Values Climate Change Adaptation Strategy 2021-2031. Furthermore, the State Party has commissioned an updated climate vulnerability assessment of the site and a climate change toolkit. It has also provided funding to support the site manager to undertake comprehensive climate adaptation planning (State Party of Australia, 2023). The ability to protect/manage vulnerable OUV values and to put in place effective adaptive management is unknown.
Management plan and overall management system
Some Concern
The Tasmanian government has in place an overall management plan (DPIPWE 2016) and is required under national legislation (EPBC Act) for this to be reviewed seven years from the effective date of the gazettal of the current management plan (21 December 2016).

Given more than seven years have passed a review has commenced with the public process currently being designed. The scope of review is to assess the performance of the plan but does not include changes (IUCN Consultation, 2025). It is imperative that the State Party and the Tasmanian government as the manager of 97% of the area, accelerate this process to ensure full and effective stakeholder engagement in the process. A Strategic Management Statement documents management arrangements for the remaining area (DPIPWE, 2016). Additionally, there are non-statutory plans, for example, applying to historic heritage and fire management; permit systems; annual work and business plans; codes of practice; Memoranda of Understanding (IUCN, 2014). A Tourism Master Plan has been developed (DPIPWE 2021b). The management of almost all of the World Heritage site is the executive responsibility of the Secretary of NRE Tas as the Director of Parks and Wildlife. The Secretary of NRE Tas reports to a Tasmanian Government Minister. Both the State and Federal ministers responsible for the site are advised by the National Parks and Wildlife Advisory Committee of Tasmania. This statutory committee has Indigenous people, stakeholders and experts in values and their presentation. It is appointed largely by the State Government, with input from the Australian Government.
Law enforcement
Mostly Effective
Law enforcement is undertaken by Tasmanian government officials (PWS staff, Tasmanian Police) as needed. Vast areas are not easily accessible which limits their vulnerability to illegal activities. However, that same remoteness makes it very difficult to enforce some regulations, e.g. vessel speed limits to mitigate river bank erosion by wave wake (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). Where vulnerability exists, as on parts of the Eastern Central Plateau, laws are effectively enforced by rangers, police or fisheries officers. Track rangers are used to patrol the more popular remote country (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). Those visiting the World Heritage site tend overwhelmingly to be law-abiding. However, in the 2016/2017 independent audit of parks management Tasmanian Audit Office into parks management (including the management of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage site) the Auditor-General noted "a lack of attention to the risk of vandalism in many of the Park Management plans and the framework and a lack of strategies to address the risk" (TAO, 2019).
Sustainable finance
Mostly Effective
The management of the site is jointly funded by the State Party and the Tasmanian governments, with an annual budget of AUD $10.2 million, for management and presentation of the property, as well as additional funding for aspects such as bush-fire and threatened species recovery, infrastructure spending, and heritage grants. The Tasmanian Government provides additional funds each year for specific management activities (State Party of Australia, 2022).
Staff capacity, training and development
Some Concern
According to the latest periodic report, human resources partly meet the management needs of the World Heritage property (State Party of Australia, 2023). Not all 156 actions in the current Management Plan can be undertaken due to cost and resourcing constraints, particularly those related to the identification and management of cultural values of the property. According to the periodic report, negotiations with the State Party are underway to ensure an appropriate budget for the next 5 year funding agreement based on identified risks and management needs that allows an increase in staffing appropriate to the Management Plan expectations (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Education and interpretation programmes
Some Concern
The current management plan states the commitment to "revitalising approaches to the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage". The ‘Interpretation and Presentation of the Aboriginal cultural values of the TWWHA Project’, managed by Aboriginal Heritage Tasmania, will provide an important contribution to the interpretation and presentation of Aboriginal cultural values in the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). While there appears to be no direct assessment of the effectiveness of interpretation and communication, the web presence of the World Heritage site allows access to a wide variety of information, clearly and attractively presented. The most recent periodic report states that improvements in the education and presentation of OUV could be made (State Party of Australia, 2023). There is a difference in the general awareness of different audiences about the status of the property. The level of awareness is highest within the tourism sector, followed by local communities adjoining the property, then youth and children. The development of education strategies and school curricula are options for inclusion in the next 5 year Business Strategy (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Tourism and visitation management
Mostly Effective
Increased tourism and visitation management effort has been made in high visitation areas where visitation has had a negative impact on value attributes. This has been a good development but potentially has taken resources away from visitor management in other areas of the site, with complaints about reduced track management in other areas (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Increased resources into maintenance and regulation of the highly popular Overland Track has reduced damage and allowed some areas to start to recover. A Tourism Master Plan for the World Heritage site has been developed (DPIPWE 2021b) providing further guidance on the policies required and opportunities for a range of tourism and related recreation experiences within the site. Recreation Zone Plans for Lower Gordon River and WOJ have been prepared which provide policy guidance for management with greater specificity and taking into the consideration the setting of those areas to a greater extend (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Sustainable use
Mostly Effective
The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) Management Plan 2016 (DPIPWE 2016) regulates all uses of the site. Debate continues in Tasmania on sustainable use of the site. Hydro-electric power production systems and commercial fishing are allowed in some parts of the World Heritage site where they occurred before inscription. Hydroelectricity generation has altered the flow regime of the Gordon River and caused erosion and changes to aquatic and riverine systems downstream, including the loss of meromixis in lakes adjacent to the lower Gordon River (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). Primary production adjacent to the World Heritage site has had some impacts on it, most notably recently with fish farming in Macquarie Harbour. A significant part of the TWWHA boundary is adjacent to State forest managed by Sustainable Timber Tasmania, a Government-owned business enterprise and the TWWHA boundary interface with forestry activities is also well managed. Current forestry practice now takes into account the proximity of the TWWHA and implements the necessary measures to protect its values with extensive areas adjacent to the TWWHA either not available for logging, not suitable for forestry, or set aside from harvest (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Monitoring
Some Concern
The Tasmanian government produces reports on the monitoring of the natural and cultural values of the site (PWS 2022a; 2022b). However, the process and results could be better directed towards management needs and/or improving the understanding of Outstanding Universal Value (State Party of Australia, 2023). Status and Trends reports for cultural and natural values were produced for only the first time recently and given that an effectiveness evaluation hasn't occurred since 2015, monitoring could be improved further.
Research
Mostly Effective
The Tasmanian government oversees scientific research within the site and maintains a research and monitoring program to identify values and conservation requirements in the TWWHA, jointly funded by the State Party. A wealth of high-quality research across a wide range of natural values has been conducted for decades, often strongly linked to the management of the World Heritage site. Some concerns are raised that the research effort is insufficient to keep up with existing and emerging threats. However, effort and investment has remained constant, is reviewed on an annual basis, and responds to existing and emerging priorities. Further knowledge transfer and engagement with local communities and university researchers is a key identified need in the 2023 periodic report (State Party of Australia, 2023). Cultural values remain poorly identified and there is a concerted effort now in place to enhance the identification, understanding and protection of Tasmanian Aboriginal sites and values across the property, which is deeply intertwined with the effective protection of natural values.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Some Concern
The complex array of land tenures bordering the site means that no single management system is in place to address all threats. Concerns have been raised regarding the need to increase active management of both existing and emerging threats. For instance, increased spread of damage from feral deer due to the porous nature of the boundary, and the lack of resources to manage the wild population across multiple tenures, means that some OUV values are under increased threat.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Mostly Effective
The current management system allows issues to be raised and discussed with PWS management.
There are differing views on many specific aspects of site management; however, there are no indications of substantial deficits in park management. The Parks and Wildlife Service has developed evaluation and reporting systems to support adaptive management. The actions in the plan guide evaluations and internal funding decisions. Management has been effective in maintaining the values of the site, except where threats to values are uncontrollable at the management level and cannot readily be mitigated (e.g. sea level rise and some other consequences of climate change). Innovations in management of the fire threat are particularly notable (State Party of Australia, 2019).
The management of the site is undertaken professionally by the Tasmanian government and is helped by a high degree of natural protection due to the scale, location, limited infrastructure and harsh environmental conditions. Increasing threats however pose significant challenges for management. A Tourism Master Plan for the site is now in place which provides guidance on the constraints and opportunities for a range of tourism and related recreation experiences within the site. It is of concern that it does not enjoy the full support of key stakeholder and civil society groups. Ongoing concerns relate to pollution in Macquarie Harbour, and the process for tourism development proposals not having sufficient input from stakeholders potentially leading to inappropriate tourism that impacts on the undisturbed nature of the wilderness and the OUV of the site. These issues require further consideration by the Tasmanian government and the State Party. Additionally, education, staff capacity, boundary management and the meaningful engagement of Aboriginal people present aspects of some concern in the current protection and management. A positive development is that the statutory process for proclamation of FPPFL land within the Tasmanian Wilderness as reserves has been completed having successfully passed through both Tasmanian Houses of Parliament. This will result in a 2,850 hectares expansion of the existing Mole Creek Karst National Park, with a further 22,550 hectares of FPPFL to be reserved as either conservation area or regional reserve.

Undisturbed wilderness and spectacular landscapes

Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
While the wilderness and landscape values of the World Heritage site remain intact, a number of direct and indirect impacts, mostly from increased commercial tourism development are of some concern to various stakeholders (IUCN and ICOMOS, 2015; TNPA 2023). Several new commercial tourism developments are proposed for the site, many involving new infrastructure and/or mechanised access, comprising a potential threat to the site’s wilderness values (Birdlife Australia et al., 2017; Gogarty et al., 2018a). Uncontrolled bushwalking in the back country is still resulting in visual scarring of landscapes of outstanding natural aesthetic value, however the impacts can be considered localised (IUCN Consultation, 2020b).

The majority of the world’s tallest flowering trees forming the largest patches of awe-inspiring very tall forests

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The eucalypt forests within the World Heritage site appear to be largely intact with observable changes being in line with natural dynamics and cycles. Since the original inscription, extensions have increased the area of protected tall eucalypt forest, in particular the latest Minor Boundary Modification approved by the World Heritage Committee according to the corresponding independent technical advice (IUCN, 2013). This extension greatly increased the amount of very tall forest (greater than 70 meters tall) within the site and included the addition of the, as yet, largest single patch of forest of this height identified globally (a single stand of over 770ha) (DPIPWE, 2019). Despite the increase in extent and number of vary tall forests and tall trees, climate change is expected to have an increasing impact on these values due to the combination of increased attrition from bushfire and changed climate reducing the potential height of regrowth (Wardaw, 2024). Rapid suppression of lightning strike fires may be necessary to ensure a future for these forests as climate changes. However, it should be noted that the lightning-ignited fires of 2018/2019 burned a substantial area of these forests in the south, resulting in the death of a number of identified giant trees and also had a localised impact on a stand of very tall forest in the Coles Creek area (State Party of Australia, 2019). In 2025 dry lightning started several major bushfires in western Tasmania and burnt across a diverse array of endemic vegetation — from coastal plains to rainforest and sub-alpine woodlands. Although this occurred mostly in areas adjoining the World Heritage area, some 9,393 ha inside the TWWHA was affected, specifically a major section of the popular Overland Track (IUCN Consultation, 2025).

Exceptional expression, diversity and scale of karst features going back up to 400 million years

Good
Trend
Stable
Overall, the integrity of the numerous karst systems of the World Heritage site is excellent, especially those located in remote wilderness areas. Certain more accessible karst caves are subject to ongoing pressure from caving activity. This activity is the focus of an agency policy and is actively managed to balance recreation and conservation outcomes. An additional potential threat is erosion and other changes due to fire and climate change. It should be noted that several extensions over time have added significant karst landforms to the World Heritage site (see for example IUCN, 2013).

Exceptionally broad range of geological and geomorphological phenomena and processes

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The World Heritage site provides a high degree of protection to its living and relictual geological and geomorphological heritage. There are, however, anthropogenic impacts on the Gordon River within the site from hydropower operations as well as tourist boats which have caused riverbank erosion. Since at least the mid 1980s, the wake from tourist cruise boats has caused erosion of the formerly stable to depositional banks of the lower Gordon River within the World Heritage Area. Speed and access restrictions on the operation of commercial cruise vessels have considerably slowed but not halted erosion of the now destabilised banks. Detailed monitoring of Lower Gordon River erosion rates undertaken since 1987 has shown ongoing erosion. Since the 1970s the Gordon Power Station has discharged hydropower water back into the Gordon River below the dam, and the modified hydrology including high flow discharges have created changes to the geomorphic processes controlling stability of the Gordon River banks. An extensive monitoring program was put in place from 2001-2012 and changes to management practice to minimise environmental impact were implemented. While some improvements in bank vegetation cover and reduced geomorphic change were noted, it is not clear that excessive erosion has stopped. The extensive lightning-ignited fires of the twenty-first century are known to have badly affected some globally outstanding organic landforms (State Party of Australia, 2019). The ongoing loss of peat soils from a drying climate acerbating the effect of bushfires remains a significant concern. There are also indications that climate change may be causing a reduction in the area of active periglacial features (Annandale and Kirkpatrick, 2017). Sea level rise poses an obvious threat to coastal and estuarine landforms. Given the extent and remote nature of much of the site it is very likely that many geodiversity values contributing to criterion viii) – and any threats to those values - remain unidentified. A Geodiversity Conservation Strategy is in development to provide a framework for the conservation and appreciation of TWWHA geodiversity for its Outstanding Universal Value and role as the essential foundation upon which all other values depend (IUCN Consultation, 2024).

Ongoing ecological processes with high degree of naturalness at a large-scale

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The World Heritage site itself is not subject to direct impacts on ongoing natural processes with the exception of small areas subject to intense visitation and the impacts from hydropower in Gordon River and on Macquarie Harbour from aquaculture. At the same time, the surroundings of the site have been continuously and considerably modified over many decades by land use changes, such as the establishment of plantations. Nearby natural forests have been subject to logging and thus subject to a range of associated direct and indirect impacts, such as the introduction of weeds, pathogens, feral animals and genetic contamination etc. (IUCN and ICOMOS, 2015); threats also include planned fire escapes to forests and adjacent alpine vegetation (Law, 2009). Since inscription, the potential for infestations of new weeds has been a constant concern and in 2010 a significant new infestation of Phytophthora was detected on the Loddon Plains (State Party of Australia, 2012). Events such as these are indications that multiple impacts on natural ecological processes are still possible despite the overall effective management of the World Heritage site itself. In the medium term, changes in fire regimes and climate will affect the nature and distribution of most ecological processes, from coastal progradation to alpine pool formation (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). There have already been major losses of foredunes and marsupial lawns across the south coast. Monitoring of vegetation suggests plant species / vegetation communities migrating to some extent in response to this disturbance, but extent of community zones now contracted dramatically compared with their former distribution (IUCN Consultation, 2024).

Unique diversity of ancient taxa

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Ancient plant taxa are concentrated in areas where fire is absent on either side of the alpine treeline (Jordan et al., 2016). A small proportion of the remaining area with these taxa has been burnt in the last decade (State Party of Australia, 2019) and climate and fire regime change predictions indicate further losses are likely. Recent monitoring of conifers detected a minor decline in tree health at some sites (Visoiu 2024). The unique microbial community of the chemocline of the formerly meromictic lakes of the lower Gordon River has been lost. That community included some 200 taxa, some of which (e.g. purple sulfur reducing bacteria) might be considered ancient (IUCN Consultation, 2020a).

High plant biodiversity with exceptional proportion of relict and endemic species

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The World Heritage site contains a number of relict and endemic plants, many of which are threatened and the site is their last stronghold. No specific reports on plant species becoming increasingly threatened are known. It can be reasonably argued that anticipated impacts due to climate change will increase the vulnerability of highly specialized plants, especially in the alpine realm.
Climate change impacts are  also expected to increase the frequency and intensity of fires, further threatening these relict species (Parliament of Australia, 2016; The Wilderness Society et al, 2016).
Recent monitoring of south-west mountains provided no evidence for a loss in diversity in unburnt areas and deduced that increases in wind may be offsetting impacts from minimum temperature rise (Kirkpatrick et al. in press, Balmer et al. 2021). Likewise monitoring of peat-bound karstic wetland habitats has detected no losses in endemic flora restricted to this habitat (NRE data). In contrast monitoring of a snowpatch at Mt Field NP found there has been an increase in shrub cover and richness and an associated loss in cover and richness of forbs, which is evidence of deterioration in the condition of snow patches (Bridle et al. 2017).

Relict and endemic mammals

High Concern
Trend
Stable
The number of rare or threatened animals has increased (over 30 EPBC listed, 49 TPSA listed), with threats mostly occurring outside the TWWHA – highlight the increasing importance of the site. Most populations of relict and endemic mammals in the World Heritage site appear to be stable. The numbers of Tasmanian devils have continued to decline across Tasmania (Lazenby et al., 2018), however, devils occur widely throughout the World Heritage site, with large areas free or largely free of the impacts of Devil Facial Tumour Disease (Driessen et al. 2020, 2022, 2024a, 2024b; DPIPWE unpublished survey reports).

Rare, relict and endemic birds

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Having undergone an extremely rapid decline, the Orange-bellied Parrot (Neophema chrysogaster) is currently listed as Critically Endangered (Birdlife International, 2024). It faces an uncertain future, especially due to severe threats during the migration and in its wintering range on mainland Australia. The World Heritage site is of critical importance as the only breeding site of the species. A National Recovery Plan for the species was revised in 2016 (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, 2016) and there are captive breeding programs to provide regular augmentation of the wild population (State Party of Australia, 2015). Through ongoing strategic management actions including annual releases of captive birds, supplementary feeding, provision of artificial nest boxes, and planned burning for habitat maintenance, the population is showing a positive trajectory but is still heavily reliant on management (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Masked owls and swift parrots occur/have occurred in the TWWHA and they seem also to be of high concern and deteriorating with respect to range and potential available habitat outside of the TWWHA, however data to confirm this is not available (IUCN Consultation, 2024). The globally important Mewstone Shy albatross population (60%) appears stable (Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania, 2023, IUCN Consultation, 2025).

Relict and endemic frogs

High Concern
Trend
Stable
Globally amphibians are extremely vulnerable to a range of interacting factors, including climate change and fungal diseases such as Chytrid. A Tasmanian Chytrid Management plan was developed and implemented in 2010 with a primary focus on the World Heritage site. A number of biosecurity measures have been implemented to minimise the spread of this and other diseases (Philips et al. 2010, DPIPWE, 2010).

Endemic and threatened reptiles

High Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
The number of rare or threatened animals has increased (over 30 EPBC listed, 49 TPSA listed), with threats mostly occurring outside the TWWHA – highlight the increasing importance of the site. Nevertheless, climate change has been identified as the primary threat to alpine skinks that are restricted or occur primarily in the TWWHA and are listed as Endangered as a consequence. Three species of alpine skink (Carinascincus orocryptus, C. microlepidotus and C. greeni) were listed as Endangered in 2023 based on modelling that suggests their ranges may reduce under projected climate change. However, no monitoring data for these species exists. The locally endemic Pedra Branca Skink (Carinascincus palfreymani), which is naturally restricted to Pedra Branca Island is listed as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Chapple et al., 2022).

Endemic and threatened freshwater fish

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Freshwater fish in Tasmania have naturally very limited distributions and are threatened by competition with and predation by introduced fish species such as brown trout, as well as habitat loss and degradation (Hardie et al., 2006). The Lake Pedder Galaxias (Galaxias pedderensis), strictly endemic to just Lake Pedder, has gone extinct in its original habitat following the flooding of the original Lake Pedder for a hydro-electric scheme and the subsequent introduction of predatory alien brown trout, and spreading of the native Climbing Galaxias, which did not previously occur in Lake Pedder. Although this species has been successfully translocated to Lake Oberon and a water supply dam at Strathgordon, it is listed as extinct in the wild under the EPBC Act (effective 06-Jun-2005). The other native Galaxias species, as well as other native freshwater fish occurring in the World Heritage site are similarly vulnerable. The Clarence Galaxias (Galaxias johnstoni), for example, is likewise listed as Endangered (EPBC), its distribution is restricted and threatened by alien brown trout. The swamp galaxias (Galaxias parvus) has been assessed as Vulnerable (EPBC), however, no population trends could be identified yet (Freeman, 2019). The shallow wetlands of the Central Plateau are likely to dry out more with climate change, possibly threatening some native fish species (Davies and Driessen, 2025).

Enormous diversity of relict and endemic groups of invertebrates

Low Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
The trends in the highly diverse and in many cases endemic invertebrate populations within and around the World Heritage site are largely unresearched. However, invertebrates are as susceptible as their hosts, food sources and breeding places, which are better known. For example, the fate of the Pencil Pine Moth depends on the fate of the fire-susceptible Pencil Pine. Inasmuch as relict and endemic invertebrates tend to be associated with relict and endemic plants and vegetation types, changes in fire regimes and climate give cause for concern. However, overall monitoring of several species of relict and or endemic invertebrates have shown no evidence of decline (Ahyong, 2016; Driessen, 2019; Driessen et al., 2014; Driessen, 2010).

Tracts of undisturbed peatlands and moorlands

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The significant increase in the area burnt by landscape-scale fires in the summer months is a serious threat, given documented impacts on organic soils of such fires (Parks and Wildlife Service, 2015). Conditions are marginal for the formation of these soils, suggesting that they will experience decline as climate warms and dries.
 

Wild temperate coastline

Low Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
The impacts of sea-level rise due to climate change are yet to be fully evaluated or modelled, however there are several vulnerable types of features along the coast including lagoons, estuarine flats, dunes and beaches, and some of them are known to be retreating, especially on microtidal low energy sedimentary coasts. Interpretation of available sandy coast data is hampered by the shortness of the time series of monitoring. Estuaries such as Bathurst Harbour and the lower reaches of rivers entering it are eroding in what is interpreted to be an early response to sea level rise (Bradbury 2011). This is likely due to the facts that sea level rise over the past century represents a substantial fraction of the microtidal range and, unlike sandy coasts, recovery does not occur as part of a cyclic cut and fill process.
 

Unusual assemblages of deep marine species are found within the large estuaries, where communities are moderated by dark tannic freshwater, overlaying salt

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Systematic monitoring of the submarine invertebrate communities in Port Davey in 2003, 2010, and 2023 show that this system is inherently stable over these time frames (Barrett et al. 2024). However, a significant cause for concern is a 90% decline in sea whip abundance relative to 2002 levels at 5m depth. This is presumed to be a consequence of drought conditions leading up to both the 2010 and 2023 surveys, reducing the tannin concentration in surface waters to a point where algal growth became possible at 5 m depth in the mid-estuary, smothering components of the invertebrate fauna. Ongoing monitoring will enable recovery rates to be determined, improving our understanding of the natural variability of these fragile assemblages in a changing climate.

Further evidence indicates a high risk of extinction for the Maugean skate (the only "deep-sea" skate found in estuarine/fresh water) in Macquarie Harbour in the near future. The Maugean skate's population declined by almost 50% between 2014 and 2021, with the main threat to the species being degraded water quality (in particular low levels of dissolved oxygen) due primarily to salmon farming, compounded by hydro-electric damming and the impacts of climate change (DCCEEW 2025).
There is a significant correlation between the reduction in dissolved oxygen levels and increases in salmonid aquaculture due to the bacterial degradation of organic material introduced into the water column from fish-feed and fish-waste. Two significant mortality events were observed in 2019, coinciding with rapid changes in water quality (particularly dissolved oxygen) exacerbated by extreme weather events. Furthermore, the capture of juveniles in monitoring surveys has significantly decreased in recent years, indicative of possible recruitment failure in the remaining population. The University of Tasmania’s Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies has released a series of reports on its research into the Maugean skate population status. The most recent report indicates that there are signs of recovery of the species and the capture of juveniles in 2022, 2023 and 2024 indicating some recruitment success. The primary conclusion of the report is that the population appears to be recovering and that more robust sampling is required (Moreno et al. 2025).
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
Although the Tasmanian Wilderness is a vast and for the most part intact area which has conserved most of the specific conservation values for which it was inscribed on the World Heritage List, a number of threatening processes are causing the deterioration of some of its World Heritage values, including erosion of some landform features and resultant downstream sedimentation, and the risk of the extinction in the wild of several species (the Maugean Skate, the Orange-bellied Parrot, alpine skinks and freshwater fish such as Galaxia spp.), although most others are not at risk in the TWWHA. Other key species facing major challenges include the alpine vegetation (such as iconic conifers - pencil pine and king billy pine), and riverine rainforest (including prodigiously long-lived Huon pine). Landscape-scale fires caused by climate change constitute a major threat to many of the site’s ancient and other significant life forms along with landscapes created, modified and managed by Aboriginal people through the use of fire. Some landscape and wilderness values, ecological processes, and geodiversity values have also declined in parts of the site since inscription.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important values
Low Concern
Improving
Cultural values remain poorly identified and there is a concerted effort now in place to enhance the identification, understanding and protection of Tasmanian Aboriginal sites and values across the property (State Party of Australia, 2023). Limited information is available or has been generated on threats to the Pleistocene rock shelters in the TWWHA. Importantly, these sites are considered to be potentially susceptible to a range of natural and cultural threats including those associated with climate change and increased human activity (PWS 2022b). There is significant potential to improve the engagement of Aboriginal people in the management of the site. In the past efforts to include Aboriginal people in management in the TWWHA have been tokenistic at best, and genuine joint management with the Aboriginal community does not exist in Tasmania with respect to State reserved lands.

Additional information

Outdoor recreation and tourism,
Natural beauty and scenery
Tasmanian Wilderness is a well-established destination enabling a wide range of visitor experiences, including self-sufficient hiking in remote areas.
History and tradition,
Wilderness and iconic features,
Sacred natural sites or landscapes,
Cultural identity and sense of belonging
The World Heritage site has strong meaning due to its Aboriginal past and present. As one of the last great temperate wilderness areas left on the planet, the site also serves as an inspiration for many. The strong protection status supports the conservation of sacred sites and other aboriginal sites. The site is also acclaimed as a resource to refresh the human spirit, either through direct visits, through landscape photography and publications, and through other works such as poetry and writing (Ashley, 2009; Brown b, 2017).
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Climate change
Impact level - Moderate
Trend - Increasing
Carbon sequestration,
Soil stabilisation,
Coastal protection,
Flood prevention,
Water provision (importance for water quantity and quality)
This vast World Heritage site provides a wide range of services, including but not limited to carbon sequestration, water regulation and purification, soil stabilisation and coastal protection. The water regulation services are the basis for hydropower generation in some of the catchments, but also comprise completely wild, untrammelled river valleys elsewhere.
Importance for research,
Contribution to education
A substantial amount of research and education activities in the World Heritage site have been undertaken since inscription, including but not limited to botany, zoology, geology, geomorphology, archaeology, palynology, and dendrochronology. However with a changing climate and increased threats, additional knowledge is needed to underpin future decision making and a foundational research and monitoring program will inform an evaluation framework for the site. Continued efforts to use the World Heritage site for educational purposes should be encouraged as it provides a wealth of opportunities across thematic areas to enhance the understanding of the community be they children or adults.
Notwithstanding research previously undertaken, further research is required on Aboriginal cultural values, in areas including cultural landscapes, sites at risk to climate change and in fire management. Criterion viii) geodiversity values are in general underappreciated and could benefit from further identification and research.
 
Fishing areas and conservation of fish stocks
The marine areas contribute to the protection of fish stocks.
Access to drinking water
The site protects important drinking water resources.
This vast World Heritage site provides a wide array of benefits. In addition to the obvious benefits of conserving major and irreplaceable cultural and natural values, the site is an iconic symbol as one of the last remaining large tracts of wild temperate lands anywhere on the planet. This World Heritage site has major spiritual and cultural importance for the Aboriginal community. The site also generates hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and over 5000 jobs in management and tourism and serves as a rare and diverse reference area for many fields of science. Among the many ecosystem services, carbon sequestration, soil protection and water regulation and provision stand out, the latter also supporting hydropower generation.
Organization Brief description of Active Projects Website
1 Tasmanian Government On-going adaptive management of visitation to the lower Gordon River continues to be informed by provision of relevant geoscientific information and advice. Deliverables include time series data sets allowing identification of any trends and potentially enabling correlation of cause and effect.
2 Tasmanian Government Expanding upon an erosion monitoring program, geomorphological studies are aimed at identifying, assessing, mapping and documenting the nature, distribution and potential outstanding universal values of saltmarsh and other low-lying soft sediment landforms in the Port Davey – Bathurst Harbour area. This will allow better informed management decision making regarding existing and potential threats to those values, most notably tourism and climate change induced sea level rise.
3 Tasmanian Government Establishment of landscape-scale monitoring of trends in distribution, abundance and health of priority wildlife (e.g. devils, quolls and wombats) and invasive species (fallow deer and cats) and assessment of the impacts of bushfires and development activity.
4 CSIRO, DCCEEW In concert with the managers of World Heritage Properties in Australia, and an Indigenous Reference Group map out the implications of climate change for World Heritage properties in Australia and provide an assessment of impacts and vulnerabilities
http://dcceew.gov.au/parks-heritage/heritage/publications
5 Tasmanian Government Development of a Geodiversity Conservation strategy to provide a framework for the conservation and appreciation of TWWHA geodiversity for its Outstanding Universal Value and role as the essential foundation upon which all other values depend. Strategy goals are yet to be finalised but include 1/ Establishment of a broadly-based social mandate for the conservation of TWWHA geodiversity. 2/ The broad range of TWWHA geodiversity, its values and their protection requirements are identified and understood. 3/ TWWHA geodiversity values are protected by well informed, effective management. 4/ The Strategy is effectively implemented and achieves measurable results with continuous improvement in geodiversity conservation outcomes. Each goal has multiple objectives and action pathways.
6 Tasmanian and Australian Governments Taking into account guidance from the Commonwealth Threatened Species Scientific Committee outlined in the approved Maugean Skate Conservation Advice and the Tasmanian Government’s Maugean Skate Conservation Action Plan, the National Recovery Team for the Maugean Skate developed a Roadmap of Agreed Action which prioritises key research and conservation management actions for recovery of the species, many of which are currently underway.
https://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/83504-conservation-advice-06092023.pdf https://cradlecoast.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Maugean-Skate-Recovery-Team-Roadmap-of-Agreed-Actions_Feb-2024-compressed.pdf https://nre.tas.gov.au/conservation/threatened-species-and-communities/lists-of-threatened-species/threatened-species-vertebrates/maugean-skate/conservation-action-plan-for-the-maugean-skate

References

References
1
ABC News (2024). Heli-tourism proponent to seek federal approval to fly helicopter to remote Lake Malbena to repair historic Halls Hut, accessed at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-02/tas-lake-malbena-hel…
2
Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania (2021). Submission to the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Reservation of Future Potential Production Forest Land in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Accessed at: https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/71%20 FPPF%20Land%20Submission%20-%20Aboriginal%20Land%20 Council%20Tasmania.pdf
3
Ahyong, S.T. (2016). The Tasmanian Mountain Shrimps, Anaspides Thomson, 1894 (Crustacea, Syncarida, Anaspididae). Records of the Australian Museum 68(7): 313–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1669
4
Allan, K., Gartenstein, S. (2010). Keeping it clean: A Tasmanian field hygiene manual to prevent the spread of freshwater pests and pathogens. NRM South, Hobart, Tasmania.
5
Annandale, B. and Kirkpatrick J.B., 2017. Diurnal to decadal changes in the balance between vegetation and bare ground in Tasmanian fjaeldmark. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research 49, 473-486.
6
Ashley, P. (2009). The spiritual values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area and implications for wilderness management. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
7
Australian Government (2023). Update to the State Party Report on the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness. Letter to Director World Heritage Centre.
8
Balmer J, Whinam J, Kelman J, Kirkpatrick JB, Lazarus E, 2004. A review of the floristic values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, Nature Conservation Report 2004/3. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment
9
Balmer, J., Bradbury, J., Richards, K., Rudman, T., Visoiu, M., Troy, S. and Lawrence, N. 2017. A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
10
Berthon, K., Esperon-Rodriguez, M., Beaumont, L.J., Carnegie, A.J., Leishman, M.R. (2018). Assessment and prioritisation of plant species at risk from myrtle rust (Austropuccinia psidii) under current and future climates in Australia, Biological Conservation: 218,154-162.
11
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Orange-bellied Parrot Neophema chrysogaster. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/orange-bell…
12
Birdlife Australia, Bob Brown Foundation, Environment Tasmania, Friends of the Great Western Tiers, Mole Creek Caving Club, The Wilderness Society, Tasmanian National Parks Association, 2017. Letter to Mechtild Roessler, World Heritage Centre, dated 4 September 2017 and entitled ‘THE TASMANIAN WILDERNESS: STATEMENT OF OUV, IMPACTS OF PROPOSED TOURISM DEVELOPMENTS ON OUV, AND INADEQUATE PLANNING AND APPROVALS PROCESS’.
13
Bowman, D.M.J.S., Kolden, C.A., and Williamson, G.J. (2022). Bushfires in Tasmania, Australia: An Introduction. Fire 2022, 5, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5020033.
14
Bowman, D.M.J.S., Rodriguez-Cubillo, D. and Prior, L.D. (2021). The 2016 Tasmanian Wilderness Fires: Fire Regime Shifts and Climate Change in a Gondwanan Biogeographic Refugium, in J. G. Canadell, R. B. Jackson (eds.), Ecosystem Collapse and Climate Change, Ecological Studies 241, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71330-0_6.
15
Bradbury, J. 2011.  Eroding landforms within the Port Davey ria estuary complex: wave wake or sea level rise? Monitoring report for the decade 2000-2010.  https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/conservation/geoconservation/wave…
16
Bradbury, J. 2019.  ​​Port Davey region estuarine landforms: nature, values and monitoring - Interim report.  https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/conservation/geoconservation/wave…
17
Bridle, K.L., Kirkpatrick, J.B., Gibson, N., Balmer, J. (2017) Establishment Report for Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Climate Change Monitoring Program: Clemes Tarn Snow Patch, Mt Field, Southwest Tasmania. Nature Conservation Report 17/2. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
18
Brown, B, (2017). Journeys into the wild: the photography of Peter Dombrovskis. National Library of Australia, Canberra.
19
CSIRO, Managers of World Heritage Properties in Australia, and Indigenous Reference Group (2022). The implications of climate change for World Heritage properties in Australia: assessment of impacts and vulnerabilities, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Canberra. Accessed at dcceew.gov.au/parks-heritage/heritage/publications.
20
Carle F. L. 1995. "Evolution, taxonomy, and biogeography of ancient Gondwanian libelluloides, with comments on anisopteroid evolution and phylogenetic systematics (Anisoptera: Libelluloidea)." Odonatologica 24: 383–424.
21
Carle F. L. 1996. "Revision of Austropetaliidae (Anisoptera: Aeshnoidea)." Odonatologica 25: 231–259.
22
Chapple, D.G., Michael, D., Robertson, P., Clemann, N. & Wapstra, E. (2022). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T14811A217759812. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2022-1.RLTS.T14811A21775…
23
Cotching, W.E. (2018) Organic matter in the agricultural soils of Tasmania, Australia – A review. Geoderma 312 170–182.
24
Cotching, W.E. and Kidd, D.B. (2010). Soil quality evaluation and the interaction with land use and soil order in Tasmania, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 137(3-4), pp.358–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.006.
25
Cunningham, C. X., Perry, G. L. W., Bowman, D., Forsyth, D. M., Driessen, M. M., Appleby, M., . . . Johnson, C. N. (2022). Dynamics and predicted distribution of an irrupting 'sleeper' population: fallow deer in Tasmania. Biological Invasions, 24(4), 1131-1147
26
DCCEEW (2023) Conservation Advice for Zearaja maugeana (Maugean skate), accessed at: https://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/spec…
27
DCCEEW (2025). Maugean Skate. Threatened Species Action Plan 2022-2032, accessed at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threaten…
28
DPAC (2021). Pathway to Truth-Telling and Treaty. Report to Premier Peter Gutwein. Accessed at: https://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0029/228…
29
DPIPWE (2016) Evaluation Report: Monitoring potential impacts of climate change on natural values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, August 2016. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart, Tas.
30
DPIPWE (2021). Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Biosecurity Strategy 2021-2031. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment.
31
DPIPWE (2021). Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Natural Values Climate Change Adaptation Strategy 2021-2031, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
32
DPIPWE (2021b). Tourism Master Plan for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
33
DPIPWE, 2015. Draft Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Tasmanian Government. http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/conservation/tasmanian-wilderness-…
34
DPIPWE. (2016). Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan.
Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart, Tasmania. Accessed 8 April 2017.
35
Davies, P.E. and Driessen, M.M. (2025). Potential impact of climate change on at-risk wetlands in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area – final report. Nature Conservation Report. Department of Natural Resources and Environment.

Shakesby, R. A. and Doerr S.H. (2006). Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent. Earth-Science Reviews 74: 269– 307
36
Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania (2025). Tasmanian Avian Influenza Readiness and Response Plan. Biosecurity Tasmania, Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania, February 2025. Available at: https://nre.tas.gov.au/Documents/Tasmanian%20Avian%20Influe…
37
Driessen and Mallick, 2003. The vertebrate fauna of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Pacific Conservation Biology 9: 187-206.
38
Driessen, M. M. (2010). Enhancing conservation of the Tasmanian glow-worm, Arachnocampa tasmaniensis Ferguson (Diptera: Keroplatidae) by monitoring seasonal changes in light displays and life stages. Journal of Insect Conservation 14, 65-75. doi: 10.1007/s10841-009-9225-2.
 
39
Driessen, M. M. (2019). Fire resilience of a rare, freshwater crustacean in a fire-prone ecosystem and the implications for fire management. Austral Ecology 44, 1030–1039. doi: 10.1111/aec.12770.
40
Driessen, M. M., Dewar, E., Leonard, S., Visoiu, M., Bonham, K., & Gales, R. (2022). Monitoring Priority Wildlife in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: Central Plateau. Nature Conservation Report 22/01. Natural Resources and Environment, Tasmania.:
41
Driessen, M. M., Mallick, S. A., Thurstans, S., Smith, B., and Brereton, R. (2014). Distribution and conservation status of two endemic Tasmanian crustaceans, Allanaspides hickmani and Allanaspides helonomus (Syncarida: Anaspididae). Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 148, 1–10.
 
42
Driessen, M., M., Burgess, L. G., Dewar, E., Bonham, K., & Gales, R. (2024a). Monitoring Priority Wildlife in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: Lake St Clair Nature Conservation Report, 24/01, 1–34.
43
Driessen, M., M., Dewar, E., Bonham, K., & Richards, S. (2024b). The influence of tourism-related disturbances on wildlife activity at Cradle Mountain. Nature Conservation Report 24/06, 1–27.
44
Driessen, M., M., Visoiu, M., Dewar, E., Bonham, K., & Gales, R. (2020). Monitoring Priority Wildlife in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: A Pilot Survey on the Central Plateau. Nature Conservation Report, 20/01, 1–49.
45
EPA Tasmania (2024). Dissolved oxygen levels in Macquarie Harbour highest in more than a decade. Environment Protection Authority Tasmania. Published online 13 September 2024. Available at: https://epa.tas.gov.au/news/dissolved-oxygen-levels-in-macq…
46
EPA Tasmania (2024b). Macquarie Harbour Status update for dissolved oxygen. Environment Protection Authority Tasmania. Published September 2024. Available at: https://epa.tas.gov.au/Documents/Macquarie%20Harbour%20-%20…
47
Earl, N., Love, P., Harris, R., and Reymani, T., (2019). Dry lightning has set Tasmania ablaze, and climate change makes it more likely to happen again. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/dry-lightning-has-set-tasmania-…
48
Eberhard, R., Sharples, C., Bowden, N. and Comfort, M. 2015. Monitoring the Erosion Status of Oceanic Beaches in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: Establishment Report. Nature Conservation Report 2015/3, DPIPWE Hobart.
49
Freeman, R. (2019). Galaxias parvus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T8807A129041138. Available at: <https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T8807A129041…; [Accessed 19 August 2020].
50
Giribet et al. (2016). A molecular phylogeny of the temperate Gondwanan family Pettalidae (Arachnida, Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) and the limits of taxonomic sampling. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2016, 178, 523–545.
51
Gogarty, B., Kirkpatrick, J., Fitzgerald, N., Jarman, S. McCormack, P., and Marthick, J., 2018. Commercial tourism in Tasmania’s wilderness threatens the attraction it exploits. Nature, Ecology and Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0723-z.
52
Gogarty, B.,Fitzgerald, N. McCormack, P. (2018, 2) Green light for Tasmanian wilderness tourism development defied expert advice. The Conversation. October 16, 2018. https://theconversation.com/green-light-for-tasmanian-wilde…
53
Grose C. J. (2015) Some insights into the health of Dermosols around Tasmania, Australia. Soil Research 53, 710-715. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr14193
54
HVEC. (2007). Tasmanian Wilderness: World Heritage in Danger. Crisis Report: Clearfelling in Coupe WR015F. Huon Valley Environment Centre.
55
Hardie, S., Jackson, J.E., Barmuta, L.A., White, R.W.G. (2006). Status of galaxiid fishes in Tasmania, Australia: conservation listings, threats and management issues. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 16(3): 235-250.
56
Hero, J., Gillespie, G., Lemckert, F., Littlejohn, M., Robertson, P., Brereton, R., Brown, P. (2004). Litoria raniformis. (errata version published in 2016) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T12152A86177064 (Accessed 8 March 2017).
57
Hitchcock, P.H. (2008). World Heritage at a crossroads: A review and evaluation of critical forest issues relating to Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage site. The Wilderness Society. OC Consulting, Tasmania.
58
IUCN Consultation (2020a). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation form: Respondent 1. Tasmanian Wilderness, Australia.
59
IUCN Consultation (2020b). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation form: Respondent 2. Tasmanian Wilderness, Australia.
60
IUCN Consultation (2020c). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation form: Respondent 3. Tasmanian Wilderness, Australia.
61
IUCN Consultation (2024). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation: Tasmanian Wilderness, Australia.
62
IUCN Consultation (2025). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation: Tasmanian Wilderness, Australia.
63
IUCN and ICOMOS (2015). Reactive Monitoring Mission Report Tasmanian Wilderness (Australia). Gland, Switzerland and Paris, France: IUCN and ICOMOS. Accessed 8 April 2017.
64
IUCN. (2013). World Heritage Minor Boundary Modification - IUCN Technical Evaluation, Tasmanian Wilderness (Australia). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN (Accessed 8 March 2017).
65
IUCN. (2014). Tasmanian Wilderness Conservation Outlook Assessment. IUCN World Heritage Outlook 1 (Accessed 10 March 2017).
66
Isbell, R. S. and the National Committee on Soils and Terrain (2021). The Australian Soil Classification (Third Edition), CSIRO publishing.
67
Jordan, G.J., Harrison, P.A., Worth, J.R.P., Williamson, G.J. and Kirkpatrick, J.B., 2016. Palaeoendemic plants provide evidence for persistence of open, well-watered vegetation since the Cretaceous. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25, 127-140.
68
Kirkpatrick, J.B. and Bridle, K.L., 2013. Natural and cultural histories of fire differ between Tasmanian and mainland alpine vegetation. Australian Journal of Botany 65, 465-474.
69
Kirkpatrick, J.B., Deane, A. and Parry, J., 2019. The dynamics of rush circles in subalpine grassland. Australian Journal of Botany 67, 335-340.
70
Kirkpatrick, J.B., Kriwoken, L. and Styger, J., 2019. The reverse precautionary principle: science, the environment and the salmon aquaculture industry in Macquarie Harbour, Tasmania, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, 25, 26–33. doi.org/10.1071/PC17014.
71
Kirkpatrick, J.B., Nunez, M., Bridle, K.L., Parry, J. and Gibson, N., 2017. Causes and consequences of variation in snow incidence on the high mountains of Tasmania, 1983-2013. Australian Journal of Botany, 65, 214-224.
72
Law, G. (2009). Western Tasmania: A Place of Outstanding Universal Value. Proposed extensions to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.
73
Lazenby, B. T., Tobler, M. W., Brown, W. E., Hawkins, C. E., Hocking, G. J., Hume, F., Huxtable, S., Iles, P., Jones, M. E., Lawrence, C., Thalmann, S., Wise, P., Williams, H., Fox, S., Pemberton, D. (2018). Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long-term impact of transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils. Journal of Applied Ecology. 21 Nov 2018.
74
Mallick and Driessen, 2005. An inventory of the invertebrates of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Pacific Conservation Biology 11:198-211.
75
Minasny, B., Adetsu, D.V., Aitkenhead, M. et al. (2023). Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01084-1
76
Moreno, D., Tracey, S., Woolley, B., Semmens, J.M. (2025). 2014-2024 Macquarie Harbour Maugean skate population status and monitoring report. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania. February 2025. Available at: https://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1795799… Department of Natural
77
OCG (2025a). Cradle Mountain Projects: Gateway Village Precinct Development. Tasmanian Office of the Coordinator General, accessed at https://www.cg.tas.gov.au/project_facilitation/cradle_mount…
78
OCG (2025b). EOI statistics, Tasmanian Office of the Coordinator General, accessed at https://www.cg.tas.gov.au/investment_opportunities/tourism_…
79
PWS (2022a). Tasmania Parks And Wildlife Service Natural Values Status and Trends in the Condition of Natural Values in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA), accessed at: /https://nre.tas.gov.au/Documents/TWWHA%20Status%20%26%20Tre…
80
PWS (2022a). Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service. Status and Trends in the condition of natural values in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Accessed at: https://parks.tas.gov.au/about-us/managing-our-parks-and-re….
81
PWS (2022b). Tasmania Parks And Wildlife Service Cultural Values Status and Trends in the Condition of Cultural Values in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA), accessed at: /https://nre.tas.gov.au/Documents/TWWHA%20Status%20%26%20Tre…
82
PWS (2022b). Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service. Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) Deer Control Project. Accessed at: https://parks.tas.gov.au/about-us/managing-our-parks-and-re…
83
PWS (2023). TWWHA Deer Control Project Update – July 2023 https://parks.tas.gov.au/Documents/TWWHA%20Deer%20 Control-Summary%20Update-July%202023.pdf
84
Parks and Wildlife Service, 2015. Fire Management in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Evaluation Report November 2015. Hobart: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment.
85
Parks and Wildlife Service. (1999). Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1999. Parks and Wildlife Service Tasmania.
86
Parks and Wildlife Service. (2004). State of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: An evaluation of management effectiveness. Report No. 1 (Summary Report). Parks and Wildlife Service Tasmanian Government. Hobart, Tasmania. Available at: http://www.parks.tas.gov.au/index.aspx?base=6174
87
Parliament of Australia, 2016. Report: Responses to, and lessons learnt from, the January and February 2016 bushfires in remote Tasmanian wilderness
8 December 2016. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Sen… Accessed 5 October 2017
88
Pauza, M., Driessen, M., & Skerrett, L. (2010). Distribution and risk factors for spread of amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, Australia. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms(92), 193-1999.
89
Premier of Tasmania (2024). Feds urged to climb aboard the Cradle Mountain cableway this Christmas. Press release, accessed at https://www.premier.tas.gov.au/latest-news/2024/december/fe….
90
Resources and Environment Tasmania (2023). Shy Albatross, Conservation. Marine Conservation Program, Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. Published online 27 October 2023. Available at: https://nre.tas.gov.au/conservation/threatened-species-and-…
91
Sharples C, 2003. A Review of the Geoconservation Values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Branch,, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment,, Tasmanian Government
92
Skerratt, R.L. et al. (2016). Priorities for management of chytridiomycosis in Australia: saving frogs from extinction. Wildlife Research  43, 105–120.
93
State Party of Australia (2019). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness (Australia). [online] Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/181/documents/ (Accessed 5 March 2020).
94
State Party of Australia (2022). State Party Report on the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness. Accessed at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/parks-heritage/heritage/publicati…
95
State Party of Australia (2023). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage site. State Party of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/181/documents/
96
State Party of Australia (2023). Update to the State Party Report on the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (Australia) – 2023. Accessed at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/parks-heritage/heritage/publicati….
97
State Party of Australia, 2014. Proposal for a Minor Modification to the Boundary of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (Australia). Department of the Environment. http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/places/world/tasmani…
98
State Party of Australia. (1982). World Heritage Nomination of the Western Tasmania Wilderness National Parks (Australia). Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/447/documents/ (Accessed 8 April 2017).
99
State Party of Australia. (2010). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (Australia). Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/447/documents/ (Accessed 8 April 2017).
100
State Party of Australia. (2012). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness (Australia). Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/447/documents/ (Accessed 8 April 2017).
101
State Party of Australia. (2016). Report of the State Party to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness (Australia). Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/447/documents/ (Accessed 8 April 2017).
102
Storey, K. and Comfort, M. 2007.  A progress report on the development of rehabilitation priorities for broad scale erosion within the World Heritage Area on the Central Plateau of Tasmania 2005-06.  Nature Conservation Report 2007/01, DPIPWE Hobart.
103
Styger, J., Marsden-Smedley, J. and Kirkpatrick, J., 2018. Changes in lightning fire incidence in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, 1980-2016. Fire, 1, 38; doi:10.3390/fire1030038
104
TNPA (2023) TNPA Submission on-Tasmanian Visitor Economy Strategy 2023, accessed at https://tnpa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/TNPA-Submiss…
105
TPC (2024). Tasmanian 2024 State of the Environment Report Volume 2: Technical reports, Tasmanian Planning Commission. Accessed at: https://www.planning.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009…
106
Tasmania Parks & Wildlife Service. (2019). Towards a Tourism Master Plan for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. [online] Tasmanian Government. Available at: https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/conservation/tasmanian-wilderness… (Accessed on 06 January 2020).
107
Tasmanian Audit Office (TAO). (2019). Expressions of Interest for Tourism Investment Opportunities. Performance audit — Audit Planning Memorandum. 2019. Tasmanian Audit Office. https://www.audit.tas.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/APM-EOI-Tou…
108
The Wilderness Society and Greenpeace Australia Pacific, 2016. Submission to the Senate Environment and Communications References Committee on the Tasmanian Bushfires, April 2016. file:///C:/Users/Geoff/Downloads/sub%2027%20(3).pdf Accessed 5 October 2017
109
UNEP-WCMC. (2012). Tasmanian Wilderness , Australia. UNEP-WCMC World Heritage Information Sheets. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC.
110
Visoiu, M. and Balmer, J. (2024) Montane Conifer Condition Monitoring, Revisit 1 – 2011 / 2012 to 2022 / 2023, TWWHA Natural Values Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience Program. Nature Conservation Report 2024 / 04. NRE Tas, Hobart.
111
Wardaw, T. 2024. Giants Under Threat, The Vulnerability of Tasmania’s tall Eucalypt forests to a warming climate. TERN, Brisbane
112
Wildcare (2023). SPRATS volunteers achieve 99 per cent reduction in sea spurge over 17 seasons. Accessed at: https://wildcare.clients.ionata.com.au/news/sprats-voluntee…
113
Wilderness Society (2019). Significant Concern: State of Conservation Report on the Tasmanian Wilderness to IUCN, ICOMOS and the World Heritage Centre.

Indigenous Heritage values

Would you like to share feedback to support the accuracy of information for this site? If so, send your comments below.

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.