Wadden Sea

Country
Denmark,
Germany,
Netherlands
Inscribed in
2009
Criteria
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "good with some concerns" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.

The Wadden Sea is the largest unbroken system of intertidal sand and mud flats in the world. The site covers the Dutch Wadden Sea Conservation Area, the German Wadden Sea National Parks of Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, and most of the Danish Wadden Sea maritime conservation area. It is a large, temperate, relatively flat coastal wetland environment, formed by the intricate interactions between physical and biological factors that have given rise to a multitude of transitional habitats with tidal channels, sandy shoals, sea-grass meadows, mussel beds, sandbars, mudflats, salt marshes, estuaries, beaches and dunes. The area is home to numerous plant and animal species, including marine mammals such as the harbour seal, grey seal and harbour porpoise. Wadden Sea is one of the last remaining large-scale, intertidal ecosystems where natural processes continue to function largely undisturbed. © UNESCO

© IUCN/Wendy Strahm

Summary

2025 Conservation Outlook

Finalised on
11 Oct 2025
Good with some concerns
The Wadden Sea is a unique area in densely populated Europe, with a legacy of ecological damage prior to inscription. It faces several high threats, some of which are on a global scale and driven by factors outside of the direct control of the management authority (i.e. climate change). At the same time, the World Heritage site is very well managed and studied by well-organized, cooperative and highly competent management authorities operating under the tripartite framework for conserving the site, being supported in this role by an active and committed NGO community and the civil society in the region. Under this framework, conservation measures being undertaken are demonstrating positive results despite the significant challenges being faced especially from climate change and human impacts including extractive industries, renewable energy developments and shipping related impacts. Therefore, while significant challenges remain to be managed and the site will require continued monitoring, the conservation outlook for this site in the short-term remains positive, albeit with some concerns.

Current state and trend of VALUES

Low Concern
Excellent monitoring indicates that the natural values in the Wadden Sea World Heritage site are for the most part being conserved and are of low concern overall. A number of fluctuations in numbers of migratory and breeding waterbirds over the last decades have been recorded, with some important declines e.g. for some arctic waders, as well as increases. More studies to determine the reasons for any declines and to understand appropriate management responses are under way. Marine mammal populations are also intensively studied and indicate positive trends. Nevertheless, with increasing impacts from climate change and the associated sea level rise there is some serious concern to what extent the biotic and abiotic natural components of the site are resilient to changes, especially considering the additional pressures from development-related activities, including fishing, gas, salt and oil exploration and renewable energy developments.

Overall THREATS

High Threat
The site faces numerous threats, including several high threats such as climate change effects, chemical contamination from industry and agriculture, invasive species, unsustainable fisheries, industrial and harbour development (including maritime traffic), offshore wind farm development and visitor pressure. Although the management responses to most of these threats have reduced the likelihood of damage to the values for which the site was inscribed, the potential cumulative impacts on the site's OUV from numerous activities and infrastructure developments planned or established within and in the wider setting of the property, including extractive activities (oil, salt and gas), ports and shipping, and energy facilities, which could be exacerbated by climate change, are high. The States Parties are undergoing a joint Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) development process and will produce a joint SEA scoping report, further detailing on how cumulative impacts from activities and projects both within the property and originating from the wider setting are further considered in the management.

Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT

Mostly Effective
Effective protection and management protocols are underpinned by excellent cooperation between the three States Parties such that there is institutional, financial and technical capacity to maintain the values and integrity of the site. The greatest management challenge is in maintaining the values of the site in the context of the globally-driven threat of climate change through effective on-site interventions to increase resilience and adapt to sea level rise and other climate change associated threats, which will undoubtedly impact the site's World Heritage values. Indeed, the Wadden Sea Plan is a good example in managing a number of serious threats to the site from beyond its borders, and it is expected that protection and management will be further strengthened in the next years by the implementation of the 2023 approved Single Integrated Management Plan. Overall, the current management is in many cases adequate to maintain the site’s OUV, but there are also further improvements necessary, for example regarding law enforcement and the fisheries and shipping legislation.

Full assessment

Click the + and - signs to expand or collapse full accounts of information under each topic. You can also view the entire list of information by clicking Expand all on the top left.

Description of values

Depositional coastline of unparalleled scale and diversity

Criterion
(viii)
The Wadden Sea is a depositional coastline of unparalleled scale and diversity. It is distinctive in being almost entirely a tidal flat and barrier system with only minor river influences, and an outstanding example of the large-scale development of an intricate and complex temperate-climate sandy barrier coast under conditions of rising sea-level. Highly dynamic natural processes are uninterrupted across the vast majority of the World Heritage site, creating a variety of different barrier islands, channels, flats, gullies, saltmarshes and other coastal and sedimentary features (IUCN, 2009; 2014; World Heritage Committee, 2009; 2014).

One of the last remaining natural large-scale intertidal ecosystems with natural processes continuing to function largely undisturbed

Criterion
(ix)
Natural processes continue to function largely undisturbed in one of the last remaining natural large-scale intertidal ecosystems. Geological and geomorphologic features are closely entwined with biophysical processes and provide an invaluable record of the ongoing dynamic adaptation of coastal environments to global change. There is a multitude of transitional zones between land, sea and freshwater that are the basis for the species richness of the World Heritage site. The productivity of biomass in the Wadden Sea is one of the highest in the world, most significantly demonstrated in the numbers of fish, shellfish and birds supported by the site (IUCN, 2009; 2014; World Heritage Committee, 2009; 2014).

Key site for migratory waders and waterfowl

Criterion
(x)
The World Heritage site is a key site for migratory birds as a staging, moulting and wintering area, providing high level of food and a low level of disturbance for some 10-12 million birds passing through the site each year (with up to 6.1 million birds present at the same time). The site is the essential stopover that enables the functioning of the East Atlantic and the African-Eurasian migratory flyways. For over 20 species/subspecies, more than 20% to almost 100% of the flyway population use the Wadden Sea at some time of the year. Of nine species, more than 50% of the flyway population occurs in the Wadden Sea. Furthermore, there are 18 species of which 10-50% uses the Wadden Sea. For the other 12 species in the list, this concerns 1-9% of the flyway population (Kleefstra et al. 2023).

Exceptional species richness in a salt marsh

Criterion
(x)
The World Heritage site protects critical habitat for about 2,700 marine species in the intertidal and subtidal zones and at least 5,000 semi-terrestrial and terrestrial species, mostly the flora and fauna of salt marshes and dunes on the islands. There are 2,300 species of flora and at least 4,200 species of fauna (IUCN, 2009; 2014; World Heritage Committee, 2009; 2014).
 
Important refuge for marine mammals
Marine mammals include Harbour Seal, Grey Seal, and Harbour Porpoise. After centuries of hunting, protection measures have resulted in recovery of the seal populations.
In 2025 a total of 3,051 grey seal pups and 12,064 moulting seals were counted (Schop et al. 2025) and in 2024, 8,230 harbour seal pups and 23,772 moulting seals were counted (Galatius et al. 2024) in the Wadden Sea.

Assessment information

High Threat
The site faces numerous threats, including several high threats such as climate change effects, chemical contamination from industry and agriculture, invasive species, unsustainable fisheries, industrial and harbour development (including maritime traffic), offshore wind farm development and visitor pressure. It is important to note that the management responses to most of these threats have reduced the likelihood of damage to the values for which the site was inscribed on the World Heritage list. However, given some threats with potentially catastrophic consequences, even if the site continues being well-managed, there are threats that cannot necessarily be managed at the site level (i.e. climate change) and therefore the site is subject to a high threat overall. This has also been noted by the WH Committee which highlighted the potential cumulative impacts on the site's OUV from numerous activities and infrastructure developments planned or established within and in the wider setting of the property, including extractive activities (oil, salt and gas), ports and shipping, and energy facilities, which could be exacerbated by climate change. The States Parties are undergoing a joint Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) development process and will produce a joint SEA scoping report, further detailing on how cumulative impacts from activities and projects both within the property and originating from the wider setting are further considered in the management.
Conflict, Civil Unrest & Security Activities
(Military activity)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
There are a number of active military areas which pose threats to the values of the site. In Denmark, Rømø, Ho Bay, Skallingen and Oksbøl are used in landing exercises and live firing drills are carried out; in Germany, Meldorfer Bucht has been a ballistic testing site although is rarely used and thought to be of very low impact, and the Federal Ministry of Defence is also searching for alternative testing sites outside the Wadden Sea (Kloepper et al., 2017). The extent of military activities has decreased including the abandonment of exercise sites in the early 1990s (Burbridge, 2000) and military activity has been significantly reduced since, including cooperation between military forces and conservation organisations towards the protection of the site's values (Kloepper et al., 2017). As such a number of protocols have been implemented including flight restrictions which take into account of the breeding and moulting times for birds and seals (CWSS, 2012). Historical ammunition dumping at several sites which now lie within the boundaries of the World Heritage site is considered problematic (Böttcher et al., 2015; Kloepper et al., 2017). Due to the changing geopolitical situation, this threat can currently be assessed as high.
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species
(Invasive species)
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Currently, the trilateral alien species list of the Wadden Sea Area focusses on marine species and comprises 113 species, not including birds, invertebrates and other terrestrial species. Between 1900 and 1989, 2-4 species were introduced per decade into the Wadden Sea Area. Since 1990 the rate increased to 10-15 species per decade. For the period 2011-2020, the rate almost doubled, with more than 20 species added during that decade. Most of these marine alien taxa originate from the Pacific or from the Atlantic. Major vectors are transoceanic shipping and aquaculture; intentional or unintentional introduction (horticulture, pet trade and transport) is the most important pathway for terrestrial plants. A common trilateral alien species list for terrestrial taxa of the Wadden Sea Area is still missing (Büttger et al. 2022).

Alien species occur in all terrestrial habitats in the Wadden Sea region, from intertidal salt marshes via dunes and dune slacks to forests, and in freshwater habitats like ponds and streams. There is no trilaterally harmonized monitoring or management program on alien species in the terrestrial realm of the Wadden Sea Cooperation Area. Moreover, reliable data for assessing the overall changes in the number and abundance of alien species or their effects on biodiversity and functioning of ecosystems are lacking.

In 2016, the European Union published a first list of Invasive Alien Species of Union concern, which was updated in 2017 and 2019. Currently, this list contains 62 freshwater and terrestrial vascular plants, of which 20 occur in at least one of the countries of the Trilateral Wadden Sea cooperation. Baccharis halimifolia (Eastern baccharis) is the only plant of these 20 species, which is directly associated with characteristic Wadden Sea habitats (dunes and salt marshes). In addition, 13 of the 20 plants of ‘Union concern’ occurring in Denmark, Germany and/or the Netherlands occur in freshwater ecosystems like wetlands, ponds, lakes or streams, and could thus potentially occur also in the Wadden Sea region.

According to lists on alien species of the Wadden Sea in The Netherlands and Germany provided by Lensink et al. (2015) and Schuchardt & Sevilgen (2015), a large share belongs to vascular plants (e.g. Spartina anglica; Rosa rugosa), but also mosses (Campylopus introflexus) and animals of various taxonomic groups (Branta canadensis, Dreissenia polymorpha, Cyprinus carpio, Felis catus) are considered invasive aliens. Several alien vertebrate species occur in the Wadden Sea region. Of these, some are listed on the Union list. Various species, e.g. racoon dog, live on the mainland coast but have a relevant impact as predator on ground-breeding birds (Schwemmer et al., 2021).

There is no evidence that alien species endanger the Wadden Sea Plan targets and the natural criteria (viii), (ix) and (x) for the ‘Outstanding Universal Value’ (OUV) fundamentally. They have not caused the extinction of native species in the Wadden Sea so far, and most alien species become inconspicuous residents. However, some alien species have the potential to alter dominance structures, habitats, and trophic regimes, which are fundamental for the ecosystem and the Wadden Sea Plan targets as well as for ‘Outstanding Universal Value’ (OUV). A permanent trilateral coordination group on alien and invasive species was formed by the Wadden Sea Board in 2018, with the remit of finalising a trilateral management and action plan on alien species (MAPAS) and coordinating efforts towards a harmonized trilateral and ongoing specific monitoring program for alien species (CWSS, 2020a).
Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Fisheries)
Other targeted species names
blue mussel (Mytilus edulis); brown shrimp (Crangon crangon)
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
The site contains a number of important fisheries, the most prominent of which are blue mussel and brown shrimp, with the cockle fisheries having been significant in the past.
A legacy of bottom-dredging fishery (the mechanical Dutch cockle fishery in particular) has destroyed biodiversity-rich communities including the disappearance of the intertidal mussel beds in some areas of the site (Ens et al., 2004). Studies on the impact of the cockle fishery in particular concluded that the area of mudflats containing sufficient shellfish for feeding knots decreased by fifty-five percent between 1996 and 2005. During the same period, knot numbers decreased by forty-two percent (Kraan et al., 2009) and was also attributed to the loss of 15,000 oystercatchers (Ens et al., 2004).

The shrimp fishery, which has been increasing for many years, is also responsible for a large bycatch of young fish, young shrimp and other invertebrates. Also a number of fish species with slow growth (rays and sharks) and reef building animals such as Sabellaria have disappeared in the Wadden Sea, the shrimp fishery most probably being responsible (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Management is complicated by the population growth of brown shrimp, thought to have been induced by overfishing of predator species such as cod and whiting (Kloepper et al., 2017).

Fisheries have now been further regulated (IUCN, 2009) and the blue mussel and brown shrimp fisheries are subject to increased efforts towards sustainability (Kloepper et al., 2017). These include a transition to alternative fishing methods and a (voluntary) Management Plan for North Sea Brown Shrimp; and alternative seed mussel collection technology being developed (Kloepper et al., 2017) and Denmark has now banned shrimp and mussel fishery entirely (in the inner Wadden Sea landwards of the islands). Permits for shrimp fisheries continue to be issued in The Netherlands and in Denmark west of the islands, beam-trawl based fishing activities continue (TWSC, 2025). In Germany, legal requirements (Natura 2000 and Federal Nature Conservation Law) for the Wadden Sea National Parks are not yet met by the shrimp fishery and by parts of the mussel fishery (Schumacher et al. 2023).
Shipping Lanes
(Harbours, industrial facilities and maritime traffic)
High Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
International and smaller ports and harbours directly adjacent to the World Heritage site and shipping lines close to and through the site open up a threat of maritime pollution.
Access to the harbours and maintenance of navigation channels is subject to an integrated planning system including sediment management, both to maintain the shipping routes and to avoid environmental impacts to the marine and coastal ecosystems. However, it is clear that the deepening of the navigation channels also has an impact on the site, which should be kept as small as possible. Also there is a tendency to modify and/or enlarge harbours, with some impact on the site, which must be reduced as much as possible. On New Year's Day 2019, a cargo ship lost 342 containers and 3,000 tons of cargo overboard, resulting in huge quantities of litter washing up on beaches and into the sea within the site in the Netherlands (and to a lower extend also in Germany), leading a report to recommend measures including those for '(a specific category of) container ships, and if necessary alteration of the two shipping routes north of the Wadden Islands' (Corder, 2019).

On 25th July 2023, the car-carrying cargo ship MV Fremantle Highway caught fire off the coast of the Dutch island of Ameland. The ship was en route from Bremerhaven to Port Said (Egypt) with Singapore as its final destination. It was carrying approximately 3,000 vehicles, presumably destined for sale in Asia. As fuel, the ship was reportedly carrying 1,600 tons of heavy fuel oil and 200 tons of marine diesel oil. Should the ship have sunk or lost structural integrity, long-term environmental damage would have been caused to the Wadden Sea World Heritage Site. The case underlines the significance of the Wadden Sea’s designation as Particularly Sensitive Sea Area of 2002, which was also referred to in the recently signed Wilhelmshaven Declaration, formulating the course of 2023-2026 of the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation. The Wadden Sea ministers of Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands therein urge the Wadden Sea Board to ensure the further implementation of the 2014 PSSA Operational Plans as well as urge for an evaluation and review of existing safety measures to the PSSA Wadden Sea with the responsible shipping authorities and relevant stakeholders. Artikel 24 states that “[...]Lessons learned from previous maritime emergencies have been and should be consistently drawn and implemented. [...]” In addition, the issue of shipping and ports has been identified as one of the five key topics within The SIMP Integrated Management Plan for ONE Wadden Sea World Heritage, a milestone document in the trilateral cooperation. Further, at the Wadden Sea Conference in Wilhelmshaven (D), representatives of environmental NGOs as well as Wadden Sea ports and harbours jointly signed the "Sustainable shipping and ports initiative for a well-protected Wadden Sea (Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, 2023).

Designation as an IMO Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) and implementation of a shipping Traffic Management System and emergency contingency plans are state of the art, but shipping will continue to be a significant risk for the foreseeable future (IUCN, 2009). Due to intensive wind farm development in the North Sea outside the Wadden Sea there is clearly an increase in the risk for shipping accidents which would then have an impact on the site. Industrial plants such as power or chemical plants are close to the site in some areas.
Renewable Energy
(Wind farms)
High Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
No construction of new wind turbines is allowed within the World Heritage site, although a barrier of off-shore wind-farms is present and being further developed outside of the site. In a few cases, the wind farms are even quite close and with EU policy aims to significantly increase renewable energy production by 2050, there is increased pressure to develop offshore facilities and their associated grid connections to the mainland. The trilateral LANICE project addresses these impacts on the Wadden Sea World Heritage property. The project aims to identify appropriate mitigation instruments that can be applied in the three countries while contributing to the development of a common strategic approach ahead of the next Trilateral Governmental Conference in Denmark, in May 2026.
Furthermore, the role of spatial planning and assessment considering the OUV is becoming increasingly important for the further development of onshore wind energy farms (TWSC, 2025).

Submarine cables to the wind farms are also placed within the site although these are said to cause only temporary impact (IUCN, 2009). However, given the large construction sites, the warming up of the area along the cables, the crossing of a rather wild site by many industrial structures, the impact may be much more than just temporary. The Wadden Sea Secretariat is developing a report on impacts and best mitigation options to be published in 2025. Also, due to the dynamic nature of the area there is the risk that frequent repair will be required, causing additional impact. On the other hand, the impact can be reduced by bundling cables in fewer routes and with higher capacities, although the need for more cables is increasing. There might be a limit for the number of cables being acceptable in the site. All in all, the coastal region landwards and seawards the Wadden Sea can provide large amounts of renewable energy, but it is very important (and possible) to achieve this with careful planning, which should respect all the natural values and should keep the landscape integrity preserved (WWF, 2012).
Recreational Activities
(Visitor and tourism pressures)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
The Wadden Sea Heritage region is one of the most popular tourism destinations in Northern Europe, with tourism being a major economic pillar for the rural region. Due to different administrative contexts in the three countries, transnational statistics on tourism lack a common, uniform data basis, with each country collecting and making available the data they deem relevant. Overall, the destination recorded above 46 million overnight stays in 2019, with 11,3 million in the Dutch, 27,2 million in the German, and 7,9 million in the Danish regions. However, the volume is probably considerably higher, as overnight stays in smaller accommodation establishments and private accommodation are not included in the official statistics. The total tourism revenue in the Wadden Sea Heritage region appears to have increased in recent years estimated at EUR 6.7 billion, of which EUR 3.3 billion (50.6%) in the German region, EUR 2.2 billion (32.5%) in the Dutch region and EUR 1.2 billion (17.6%) in the Danish region (Hartman et al. 2022).

The major part of the tourism activity and infrastructure takes place outside the Wadden Sea, however direct negative impacts from tourists on nesting birds has been recorded in Denmark for example (TWSC, 2025). A tourism development strategy for the World Heritage destinations (the site itself and adjacent areas on the mainland and islands) has been developed. Tourism activities are comprehensively regulated including specific management frameworks in all three states e.g. visitor information and guidance, zoning, closure of sensitive areas, and guided walks to experience the area (PROWAD, 2014; CWSS, 2014). However, increased visitor pressure has led to the development of a more static coastline and increased disturbance, and may be one of the causes for the detriment of breeding populations of species such as Little Tern, Kentish Plover and Sandwich Tern (BirdLife, 2009). To summarize, tourism in the Wadden Sea today has quite a big impact, but this has developed over many decades and was not caused by the inscription of the site on the World Heritage List. Overall (with some exceptions e.g. showing indication of over-tourism) the threat level can be assessed as low currently, with many areas not being affected by tourism. But there are risks and challenges for the protection of the area if the number of tourists would increase considerably (e.g. there is a trend towards more inland tourism in the Wadden Sea countries). Furthermore, tourism affects fresh water usage, which can impact dune slacks if water levels are lower, while water taxis can impact the marine environment due to noise and risk of collisions (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Oil & Gas exploration/development , Mining & Quarrying
(Oil, salt and gas extraction)
High Threat
Outside site
No new exploitation installations for oil and gas are permitted in the World Heritage site, however updates to existing permits and those submitted prior to the decision are exempt, meaning for example, in the Netherlands, current gas production activities will continue until 2035 while salt mining activities are permitted until 2052 (TWSC, 2025). Furthermore, there are ongoing issues related to gas development projects. In Germany, the environmental organisation Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) filed a lawsuit on 7 October 2024 against the planning approval decision of GEMS gas development at the Higher Administrative Court in Lüneburg. The relevant authorities are currently awaiting the court ruling.

One existing installation, the Mittelplate (oil), was excised from the site, as well as a gas exploitation area in the Netherlands. An independent research and monitoring programme has been conducted at Mittelplate in the Schleswig-Holstein Wadden Sea to assess its ecological impact and no negative effects have been found in an extensive area surrounding the platform (IUCN, 2009). However, there is obviously large scale damage to the natural beauty and the wilderness appearance of the site.
Subsidence as a result of gas extraction in the Dutch part of the Wadden Sea is causing impacts, with a maximum of 42cm subsidence reported in 2015 underneath Ameland island (van Thienen-Visser et al., 2015). However, gas production is adjusted or halted if there are signs that the subsidence capacity will be exceeded (Kloepper et al., 2017). Considering that due to sea level rise the Wadden Sea may face a sediment deficit in the longer term, the sediment which compensates now the subsidence will later be missing in the site. Regarding new projects that may contribute to seabed subsidence within the property, the government of the Netherlands has decided not to issue new permits for gas and salt extraction under the Wadden Sea. A legislative proposal was discussed and accepted by the Dutch parliament in 2024, with the consequence that from 1 May 2024 no additional gas or salt production will be allowed in the Wadden Sea. Regarding Ternaard gas field, the Dutch government announced on 6 December 2024 that it will enter discussions to reach an agreement with the operator to abandon gas extraction there, however under the Mining Act, there is insufficient legal basis to reject the application. Concerning Wintershall DEA (Mittelplate, new owner is Harbour Energy), the government of Schleswig-Holstein reached an agreement with the concessionaire in spring 2024 to end all oil extraction activities by 2041. In the meantime, no new licenses will be granted for the development of any new oil drilling fields in the area (TWSC, 2025).
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution, Solid Waste
(Marine litter, including microplastic pollution)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Marine litter poses a threat to the biological values of the Wadden Sea through its effect on wildlife, mainly through entanglement, ingestion and smothering, particularly amongst seabirds and marine mammals (Kloepper et al., 2017). Recent studies have found litter in stomachs of large marine mammals such as harbour porpoises (Unger et al., 2017), as well as in seabirds such as fulmars (Kloepper et al., 2017), with 60 % of the fulmars found in the Dutch/German Wadden Sea region clearly exceeding quality standard thresholds for plastic pollution from the most recent available data gathered between 2010 and 2014 (OSPAR, 2009; Kloepper et al., 2017). Such ingestion has varying degrees of effects ranging from sub-lethal with no likely population effect (as in porpoises (Unger et al., 2017)) to more serious threats posed to fulmars (and likely other seabirds) due to direct mortality effects of plastic ingestion (Kloepper et al., 2017; Kühn et al., 2015). Microplastics have also been found to be present in sediment beaches, dunes and the seafloor along the entire Wadden Sea coast (Kloepper et al., 2017; Claessens et al., 2011; Fries et al., 2013; Dekiff et al., 2014). 
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution
(Chemical contamination from industry and agriculture)
High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Agricultural and industrial runoff into the World Heritage site, including large amounts of nutrients and toxic substances was serious in the past but greatly improved through regulation. Riverine nutrient loads decreased leading to a decrease in phytoplankton biomass and organic matter turnover (van Beusekom et al., 2019) and a recovery of seagrass in the Northern Wadden Sea (van Katwijk et al., 2024). However, BirdLife (2009) note that levels of pollutants were slowly increasing again following a sharp decrease throughout the 1990s, with a large number of substances are still exceeding safe norms, including organotin compounds, PCBs, PFAs and hexachlorobenzene. Furthermore, newly developed xenobiotics, such as hormones disruptors, may have negative impacts (CWSS, 2012). Monitoring data from 2015, which was determined though seabird eggshell chemical composition analysis, suggests that there is still cause for concern with no significant reduction in chemical contamination, including that common tern eggs exceeding the limit values of Hg, PCB, HCB and DDT under Ecological Quality Objectives (EcoQOs) defined by OSPAR for coastal bird eggs from the North Sea area (OSPAR, 2007; Dittmann et al., 2012) at all investigated areas (Kloepper et al., 2017). According to the State Parties, pollution from discharge waste remains a high threat. In The Netherlands, almost 60 companies have permits to discharge wastewater into the Dutch part of the Wadden Sea (TWSC, 2025). An overview of the permits for discharge was made in 2024 and sent to the Dutch Parliament. Permits with a possible impact on the goals of the Water Framework Directive will be reviewed no later than 2027. The emission test – now obligatory under law – will determine whether discharge is acceptable from the water quality perspective.
Atmospheric & Space Activities
(Air traffic)
High Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Outside site
Since 2015, SERA (Standardised European Rules of the Air) is active, which means a minimum flight altitude in open landscapes of 500 ft (150 m). There are (at least in Germany) no special rules for the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020b). Unfortunately, on some of the inhabited islands there is quite a lot (and possibly increasing) of air traffic. Servicing the increasing number of off-shore wind farms has also recently increased air traffic over the World Heritage site concurrently. Due to many more offshore windfarms that are planned seawards of the Wadden Sea the helicopter traffic for construction and servicing might increase. Therefore, locally the quietness of the area is considerably reduced and large flocks of birds are being disturbed.
Terrestrial Animal Farming, Ranching & Herding
(Inappropriate livestock grazing)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Inappropriate livestock grazing practices could be affecting salt marsh species composition and regeneration. However, the impact has been reduced considerably already during the last 30 years. Grazing of parts of mainland salt marshes is carried out as part of coastal defense measures, or, in some areas, to aim for an enhanced biodiversity and heterogeneity of salt marshes (CWSS, 2014). Recent studies have shown different grazing regimes within a spatial mosaic, with the inclusion of long-term abandonment to be effective in achieving these goals (van Klink et al., 2016). However, the degree to which results such as these are applied in grazing management and livestock rotation is unclear. There is some risk that grazing of too many saltmarshes would be in conflict with the Guiding Principle of the Wadden Sea and the World Heritage value of "...natural processes continuing to function largely undisturbed".
Changes in Physical & Chemical Regimes, Changes in Temperature Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Climate change)
Very High Threat
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Past and to some extent present interference with the natural dynamics of the Wadden Sea system means that it has lost much of its resilience and flexibility to adapt to the impacts of climate change (e.g. Konyssova et al. 2025), including rising sea level, temperature change and natural disasters including flooding of sandbanks and salt marshes, all of which is already occurring. Increasing storm tides, for example, wash away Sandwich Tern nests (BirdLife, 2009). Experts have predicted an increase in sea level rise from 3.60 mm/year in 2024 to 3.85 mm/year in 2029 and 6.8 mm/year in 205 in the Dutch part of the Wadden Sea (TWSC, 2025).

It is positive that the Wadden Sea countries have agreed on a “Trilateral Climate Change Adaptation Strategy” (CWSS, 2014; updated in May 2025), that Schleswig-Holstein has decided on a "Wadden Sea Strategy 2100" (MELUR 2015), and that some local and regional initiatives are on the way to search for nature friendly and sustainable methods to prepare for sea level rise and to start pilot projects (WWF, 2014). An initiative on creating a "Climate Vulnerability Index" was supported by the Wadden Sea countries. Though there is a positive trend towards "nature based solutions" with the coastal defence sector, there also remain risks that large scale constructions against storm tides could in the future seriously impact the key values of the World Heritage site. Climate change, and in particular the associated sea level and temperature rise, is considered the biggest threat for the Wadden Sea in the long term, with the potential to have severe impact, potentially up to the destruction of the key values of the World Heritage site (Heron et al. 2020). The trilateral Climate Change Adaptation Strategy was revised by the trilateral Expert Group Climate Change Adaptation in 2025 (Wadden Sea Board, 2025). Additionally, national and state-level climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies are in place and are revised as required. The adoption of the EU Nature Restoration Regulation in Summer 2024 is also important for the preservation and restoration of habitats and species in the Wadden Sea Area, supporting the safeguarding of the OUV (TWSC, 2025).
Hunting, Collecting & Controlling Terrestrial Animals
(Hunting)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Hunting has been phased out in almost the entire Dutch and German Conservation Areas (Burbridge, 2000), with some local exceptions. Hunting is still allowed in large parts of the Danish Conservation Area (Miljøstyrelsen, 2017). It is noted that hunting is especially damaging in Denmark, causing disturbance, particularly in high tide roosting areas (BirdLife, 2009). The current extent and effect of hunting pressure and disturbance is unknown. However, the overall situation with hunting (formerly on waterbirds and on seals) compared with the past has improved considerably. There is some management hunting with the main reason to save the breeding populations of coastal birds.
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution
(Eutrophication through nutrient inflow)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Widespread(15-50%)
Nutrient enrichment from river inflow has impacted the Wadden Sea ecology including loss of seagrass, increased phytoplankton blooms, and increased green macroalgae blooms (van Beusekom et al., 2019). However, the situation has improved since the nutrient input peaked in the 1980s, with 2.5% decrease per annum since that period on average. Currently, although the trilateral goal of achieving an 'eutrophication non-problem area' status in the Wadden Sea has not been met yet (Kloepper et al., 2017). Indicators of eutrophication (such as summer phytoplankton biomass, measured as chlorophyll a), continuously decreased in response to decreasing riverine nutrient loads (van Beusekom et al., 2019). The reduction of riverine nutrient loads led to a recovery of seagrass in the Northern Wadden Sea but not in the southern part of the Wadden Sea (van Katwijk et al., 2024). The latter authors suggest that a further reduction in riverine nutrient loads by about 30% (compared to the 2010s) is needed for seagrass recovery in the southern part of the Wadden Sea.
Very Low Threat
New dikes and harbours, which could severely impact the World Heritage site, are currently unlikely to be approved. Potential threats also include new invasions of alien species and pathogens, and catastrophic oil spills. Though there are a lot of activities to avoid or mitigate large ship accidents and oil spills, a large risk remains that would threat the World Heritage values.
Dams & Water Management/Use
(Construction of new dikes or dams to combat sea level rise)
Very Low Threat
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Outside site
Further embankments are not allowed and areas of legal conservation have been extended and amended; the large majority of the Wadden Sea Area has been designated as Natura 2000 areas in the framework of the EU Habitat and Bird Directives and hence been subject to the stipulations of Art. 6 of the Habitat Directive (Burbridge, 2000). However, new dikes are still in the realm of possible for reasons of overriding public interest and if no alternatives can be found. However, all in all it seems very unlikely that ideas for such constructions would really be brought forward.
Water-borne & other effluent Pollution
(Deposition of mud from port of Hamburg and the river Elbe at Wadden Sea)
Low Threat
Inside site
, Scattered(5-15%)
Outside site
It is in the discussion to deposit mud from the port of Hamburg and the river Elbe at Wadden Sea sites close to the mouth of river Elbe. This sediment might be contaminated by toxics to an extent that deposition at a site from where it could spread over the Wadden Sea would not be acceptable. The risk that such a plan would really go forward can be considered low (IUCN Consultation, 2020). At present there is some mud deposit already at "Neuer Lüchtergrund" in the Elbe river at a site which is also close to the Wadden Sea (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
Mostly Effective
The Wadden Sea Plan was officially adopted in 1997 and updated in 2010 and is a politically binding document and constitutes the common framework for the protection and sustainable management of the World Heritage site as an ecological entity. The implementation of the plan is done by the standing bodies of the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation through the Ministerial Council and a Wadden Sea Board which oversees operational aspects of implementation and ensures effective coordination of the different tiers of management, and being advised in this role by a regional stakeholder forum and by Nature NGOs. The Common Wadden Sea Secretariat (CWSS) is tasked with the daily implementation of the Wadden Sea Plan, coordination of the activities in the framework of the plan and a regular review of its implementation (IUCN, 2009). The finalization of the Single Integrated Management Plan in 2023 serves to improve the integration of management across the regional and national planning systems in this transboundary serial site.
Legal framework
Mostly Effective
The site includes mostly protected areas legally established by federal or state decrees. A small part of them is under private ownership. Management of private lands is regulated by existing protective measures and entirely embedded in the trilateral protection and management scheme according to the Joint Declaration on the Protection of the Wadden Sea in conjunction with the Trilateral Wadden Sea Plan, which represents a planning and management framework for the whole area (IUCN, 2009). Other legally binding directives under European legislation are also very important e.g. the Birds and the Habitat Directive, Agreement on the Conservation of Seals in the Wadden Sea (WSSA), as well as the legal implementation of the trilateral decisions on the national and the regional level. Consideration for protected areas in fishery and the shipping legislation in particular could be improved (IUCN Consultation, 2020), however efforts are underway in this regard.
Governance arrangements
Highly Effective
The present governance was outlined in 2010. Decision-making (on the trilateral level) is limited to two levels: the Trilateral Wadden Sea Governmental Council and the Wadden Sea Board. The politically responsible body (Ministers) for the Cooperation establishes and oversees the Cooperation, gives political leadership and assures international policy development, harmonisation and decision-making between the three governments. The Wadden Sea Board is the governing body of the Cooperation. It prepares, adopts and implements the strategy, oversees the operational and advisory bodies, and secures relations with key stakeholders. The Secretariat for the Cooperation is the Common Wadden Sea Secretariat (CWSS) and CWSS is responsible for support to the Board and the Council, the implementation of the CWSS Work Plan, for support to scientific networks and projects, communications and financial management. The Decision-making bodies are supported and advised by three types of operational and advisory bodies: Advisors, Task Groups and triennial Wadden Sea Conferences. A Single Integrated Management Plan was published in 2023 (CWSS, 2023).
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
Mostly Effective
The Wadden Sea Plan was officially adopted in 1997 and updated in 2010 and is a politically binding document and constitutes the common framework for the protection and sustainable management of the World Heritage site as an ecological entity. The implementation of the plan is done by the standing bodies of the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation through the Ministerial Council and a Wadden Sea Board which oversees operational aspects of implementation and ensures effective coordination of the different tiers of management, and being advised in this role by a regional stakeholder forum and by Nature NGOs. The Common Wadden Sea Secretariat (CWSS) is tasked with the daily implementation of the Wadden Sea Plan, coordination of the activities in the framework of the plan and a regular review of its implementation (IUCN, 2009). The finalization of the Single Integrated Management Plan greatly improves the integration of management across the regional and national planning systems in this transboundary serial site (CWSS, 2023). Nevertheless, there is pressure from outside the site boundaries for development and extractive purposes which are beyond the full control of the management authorities. Nevertheless, both from the trilateral and national levels, efforts are made to raise the profile of the WH site and its critical values and protect these from other political and industry priorities. For example, by initiating a framework for collaboration of environmental NGOs, ports, ship owners and other stakeholders on Sustainable shipping and ports operations in the Wadden Sea. To address the threat from renewable energy developments, a trilateral Task Group Coordination and Management with ad-hoc Working Group Renewable Energy (WG-RE) was formed. The WG-RE’s objective is to “Intensify the application of common best practices to protect the Wadden Sea, to support nature-friendly energy transition, and to foster a level playing field with the highest applied environmental standards for all three countries in a collaborative approach with the energy sector”. Within the trilateral project "North Sea wide acceleration of LANding offshore energy while mitigating Impact on the Coastal Environment", which started in February 2024 on initiative of the WG-RE, a workshop was held to gather information on the environmental impact of grid connection planning, permitting, construction, operation, maintenance, and removal, as well as mitigation options. In addition, energy transition was tackled as overarching topic of the annual Wadden Sea Day titled “Safeguarding the Wadden Sea: Navigating Green Energy Development in the North Sea.” in August 2024 (TWSC, 2025).
Boundaries
Highly Effective
The site was extended in 2014 and now also includes areas in Denmark. Clear maps detailing site's boundaries are publicly available for the whole transboundary World Heritage site. The management have all necessary boundary data to adequately maintain the site’s OUV. A navigation system used for commercial and recreational boasts in the Wadden Sea has geo-referenced information on the boundaries of all existing protected areas and the restrictions associated to each of them (IUCN, 2009). Whilst the World Heritage property has no buffer zone, the three Wadden Sea states have
legislative protection regimes in place that reach beyond the designated World Heritage area, such as EU Natura 2000 Directives (TWSC, 2025).
Overlapping international designations
Highly Effective
The global importance of the Wadden Sea is also reflected by the fact that it is recognized as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve and is granted the status of Wetlands of International Importance by the Ramsar Convention. It is also part of the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. The SIMP offers an integrated management plan for all these overlapping designations.
In Germany- Expansion of the UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: The ongoing development of the transition zones in the three German Wadden Sea National Parks in the federal states of Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg, and Lower Saxony has intensified. New projects are under way which contribute to sustainable development, nature protection and education (TWSC, 2025).
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
Some Concern
Most recent Committee recommendations and request centre around the cumulative impacts on the OUV including from extractive activities (oil, salt and gas), ports and shipping and energy facilities, which could be exacerbated by climate change (46COM 7B.51 and 45COM 7B.23). In response, the States Parties are developing a joint SEA to assess how cumulative impacts from activities and projects both within the property and originating from the wider setting are further considered and how management could be further improved (TWSC, 2025). In response, management instruments at the trinational and national levels have been strengthened and improved coordination achieved through the 2023 approved SIMP. The Netherlands has also not issued new permits for gas and salt extraction under the Wadden Sea in 2024, however updates of current permits and permits submitted before 1 May 2024, are exempt. As a result, current gas production activities will continue until 2035 while salt mining activities are permitted until 2052. In practice, the ‘hand on tap’ system will limit salt drilling under the Wadden Sea at an earlier stage.
Climate action
Highly Effective
The commitment to enhance the protection of the property and the resilience of the Wadden Sea ecosystem to climate change as expressed in the Wilhelmshaven Declaration, remains strong. This is supported by The SIMP Integrated Management Plan for ONE Wadden Sea World Heritage (SIMP), which takes a strategic approach to the long-term preservation of the property. The trilateral Climate Change Adaptation Strategy was reviewed in 2025 (Wadden Sea Board, 2025) and a thematic Wadden Sea Quality Status Report on climate change was published in 2024.
In 2020-2022, the Wadden Sea trialed the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI) methodology, a systematic tool to rapidly assess the risk of climate change to World Heritage. The three key climate stressors impacting the Wadden Sea OUV identified with this methodology are: temperature trend (air and/or water), extreme temperature events and sea level rise.
Climate change effects in the Wadden Sea are strongly interlinked with coastal protection, and spatial planning Management plans and projects must cope with uncertainties regarding the extent of climate change and responses of the highly complex Wadden Sea system. The demand for adaptive flood protection and combined coastal risk and nature conservation management is increasing and with it new concepts of eco-engineering such as Nature based Solutions (NbS) are emerging. A common transnational evidence base to optimise the effectiveness of NbS was developed in the INTERREG North Sea Region project “Building with Nature” (2015-2021). From 2022-2028, a follow-up North Sea Region Interreg Project MAinstreaming NAture-BAsed Solutions through COASTal systems (MANABAS COAST) is setting the stage for widescale application and implementation (mainstreaming) of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) in coastal systems of the North Sea Region including the Wadden Sea while combining Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management and Biodiversity goals. Coastal Flood Defense and protection is also a key topic in the SIMP Integrated Management Plan for ONE Wadden Sea World Heritage (CWSS 2023).
Management plan and overall management system
Highly Effective
The collective management effort is somewhat complex (involving several different associations and/or organisations) but in many ways exemplary, creating true and functional cooperation between the three countries at different levels (CWSS, 2016). The cooperation is long-standing and predates the World Heritage nomination, the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation (TWSC) was established in 1978. The actual management on the trilateral level is handled by the Common Wadden Sea Secretariat (CWSS), on the national/regional level by the respective authorities. The Wadden Sea Plan and the Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Strategy, prepared to address recommendations from the European Parliament on coastal zone conservation and management, provide a framework for managing the area. There are specific management plans for the different protected areas within the World Heritage site (IUCN, 2009). In 2023 a single integrated management plan (SIMP) has been approved, enhancing trilateral cooperation and guiding management actions at the national and site levels.
Law enforcement
Some Concern
There is in many cases effective law enforcement via local police, coastguards and naval police forces through an integrated system of patrolling and inspection (IUCN, 2009). Fishing vessel movement is partly collected using VMS data, however, it is unclear if this is done in real-time (facilitating fisheries enforcement) or collected later (CWSS, 2016) or at all. Overall the management is actively pursuing effective enforcement, however, there are still few official rangers/wardens and many warden activities are undertaken by volunteers or employees of NGOs. An observer system has been in place in Dutch and German fisheries within the site since 2009 to monitor fishing practices as well as gather data on bycatch (Kloepper et al., 2017), although this system is limited (IUCN Consultation, 2020a). However, given the low level of police activities in most parts of the Wadden Sea concerning nature regulations and also on fishery regulations, there is "some concern."
Sustainable finance
Mostly Effective
The site was well supported in terms of human and financial resources at the time of inscription (IUCN, 2009), and remains so through the commitments made by the three States Parties in the Joint Declaration on the Protection of the Wadden Sea and corresponding Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation, and the national activities. However, there remains underfunding in terms of on ground management e.g. warden activities of the area, and coordinating the educational activities (IWSS). There are various collaborations in external bilateral or trilateral projects like MANBAS, Dark Sky and TSI Flyway (IUCN Consultation, 2025) and ongoing calls for projects to help gain a better understanding of the complex pressures on the Wadden Sea to inform effective protection and management of the area (e.g. https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/projects-dutch-german-research-call-now-officially-launched).
Some foundations on national and regional level support Wadden Sea conservation financially.
Staff capacity, training and development
Highly Effective
Existing staff working directly in the protected areas within the World Heritage site include over 200 permanent positions covering technical experts, scientist and rangers. These permanent staff positions are complemented by over 200 additional staff funded by NGOs and local governments. Staff are mostly highly qualified and subject of on-going training programmes to enhance their effectiveness (IUCN, 2009). However, the number of wardens should be increased.
Education and interpretation programmes
Highly Effective
The site benefits from a highly effective education and interpretation programme which is guided by the Wadden Sea Strategy on Education for Sustainable Development and World Heritage Interpretation, adopted in 2018, which 'provides a trans-boundary framework for environmental education and interpretation in the entire Wadden Sea World Heritage Site. It stands for ONE Wadden Sea and builds up on the local, regional and national strategies, concepts and individual activities – without replacing these – and provides an umbrella to promote the Wadden Sea’s OUV in an international and interdisciplinary approach' (CWSS, 2020b). The “International Wadden Sea School” (IWSS) has been established to support this network on a permanent basis in cooperation with the WWF (CWSS, 2014). It also provides and distributes tools for nature education among the educational sector in the Wadden Sea.
Overall there are over 60 interpretation centres at the site, thousands of guided tours, and various national projects and programmes are established.
An example for the latter is that in The Netherlands a new project has started to make the Wadden Sea Area Plastic free through cleaning, inflow prevention and developing alternatives for plastics in the tourism sector. In total, this is an investment of € 14 million. The management authority has developed a management plan to reduce disturbance of nature and looks at potential areas for zonation of nature. The new visitor centre for the Dutch part of the Wadden Sea on Lauwersoog opened its doors in April 2025 (TWSC, 2025). Additionally the site's efforts for youth engagement are commendable e.g. Flyway Youth Forum serves as an annual platform for young wetland conservationists to develop an essential skillset from a flyway perspective. In September 2022, the first Trilateral Youth Conference was held.
Young people already engaged in the Wadden Sea came together to exchange, discuss challenges and ideas that were later reported to the trilateral ministers during the 14th Trilateral Governmental Conference in 2022. Currently, a trilateral youth network is being built to sustain the engagement of young people across the three countries (TWSC, 2025) and in 2025 there was the second transdisciplinary Wadden Sea World Heritage Summer School (Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, 2025).
Tourism and visitation management
Mostly Effective
A Trilateral Sustainable Tourism Strategy has been developed to enhance the cooperation between tourism and nature conservation to protect and maintain the OUV of the site (PROWAD, 2012; CWSS, 2014). The strategy was evaluated in 2024 and highlighted that some goals were not met fully due to clarity of objectives and challenges in implementation (TWSC, 2025). EU-funded projects such as VaBene and WaddenVision play a crucial role in advancing the Wadden Sea’s sustainable tourism strategy. By equipping local stakeholders with resources and training, they foster sustainable practices that benefit both tourism and environmental conservation. The Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, representing the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation, strengthens project synergies and ensures a coordinated approach to sustainable tourism across the region.

There is also an action plan accompanying the tourism strategy. In terms of monitoring tourism, there is no comprehensive measurements of tourism activities in place for the entire Wadden Sea Region, despite available statistics for each country, mainly due to difficulties in harmonising national statistics under one unified system (Kloepper et al., 2017; Hartman et al. 2022). The 2017 Quality Status report recommends 'that the three countries identify which monitoring means can be put in place in all three countries as part of the TMAP with a view to ensuring appropriate and compatible monitoring of tourism activities in the entire Wadden Sea Region' (Kloepper et al., 2017). There is also a lack of clarity whether there are already signs of over-tourism in certain spots and how to cooperatively handle/manage the issues associated with this issue (IUCN Consultation, 2020). To improve this WWF has published the "Wadden Sea Tourism Radar" (Günther, 2022). In Denmark there is evidence of excessive pressure from tourists on beach areas important for nesting birds, however the through closing off specific areas and utilising volunteers to fence nesting areas, this pressure seems under control (TWSC, 2025).

By the end of 2025 the 1st phase of a project to improve the understanding of impacts from tourism: guidelines for monitoring and assessment of tourism will be completed (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Sustainable use
Mostly Effective
North Sea fish have for a long time been subject to strong fishery pressure, and after large fish had disappeared, fisheries in the Wadden Sea focused on shellfish and shrimp. This has affected the benthos in general: native oysters and Sabellaria reefs and some fish species have vanished, in some areas, subtidal mussels are mostly confined to culture lots, and intertidal beds are intermittently strongly decimated, while catches of shrimp have been sustained. Industrial cockle fishery has recently been banned completely. The management are taking important steps to improve and integrate fisheries management with conservation goals, including adopting specific trilateral policy principles (in 2014) and national permit programmes (Jager, 2015; CWSS 2016; Kloepper et al., 2017; TWSC, 2025). For more than ten years, the Wadden Sea National Parks in Germany and Denmark has been facilitating partner programmes to support local communities, including local businesses, and also to receive support for nature protection. On a voluntary basis, partners focus on more sustainable development, especially regarding tourism. The World Heritage Partnership Programme provides education on the Wadden Sea World Heritage Site and its OUV (TWSC, 2025).
Monitoring
Highly Effective
Since 1999, the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation (TWSC) between Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands has periodically produced Wadden Sea Quality Status Reports (QSR) describing and evaluating the current ecological status of the Wadden Sea. The QSRs identify changes in this status and their possible causes, classify issues of concern and indicate possible measures of amelioration, including evaluation of the likely effectiveness of these measures. They also indicate gaps in our knowledge. The QSRs are based upon the Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Programme (TMAP). The last iteration of the reports was published in 2017 and updated in 2022 (CWSS, 2013; CWSS, 2016; Kloepper et al., 2017). The entire site is subject to active planning, management and monitoring, in national and international contexts, and in many cases with a good level of integration and harmonized approach between the three countries involved in the management of the Wadden Sea (IUCN, 2009). The Wadden Sea Flyway Initiative (WSFI) has continued to strengthen close collaboration with local, regional, and international partners along the East-Atlantic Flyway and contributes to organizing annual waterbird counts along the East Atlantci Flyway. To further improve the flyway monitoring programme, the TWSC initiated an assessment of potential monitoring innovations funded by EU DG REFORM. The aim is to gather more concrete information on abundances, vital rates and environmental conditions at key sites to inform concrete management measures through the WSFI capacity building programme, steps towards implementation are taken (TWSC, 2025). Furthermore, the Wadden Sea Flyway Initiative received 10-month funding from the German International Climate Initiative (IKI) for the project ‘Climate Resilience for Critical Sites for Migratory Birds and People along the East Atlantic Flyway’, which aims to improve conditions for migratory birds at a flyway-scale through collaborations with 14 local and international partners from eleven countries along the East Atlantic Flyway (Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, 2025).
Research
Highly Effective
One attribute of the OUV of the site is that “it is also one of the best-studied coastal areas on the planet, providing lessons of wider scientific importance for wetland and coastal management of international importance” (World Heritage Committee, 2009). Tremendous amount of research is ongoing on in the area, including research and modelling applied on climate change predictions in the Wadden Sea (IUCN, 2009), evidenced by recent publications such as Becherer et al., 2018; Benninghoff and Winter, 2019 and Vermeersen et al., 2018 or van Beusekom et al., 2019 and van Katwijk et al., 2024 on Wadden Sea wide eutrophication as well as the 2017 Wadden Sea Quality Status Report, updated in 2022 (Kloepper et al., 2017). The management has been quite effective in getting research done in key management areas, in collaboration with various partners, including research institutes e.g. Waddenacademie, NIOZ, Deltares, AWI, several universities, think tanks, etc. Furthermore, there are efforts to support young scientists. In August 2024, the TWSC and partners organised the first trilateral summer school on Wadden Sea World Heritage with the aim to engage with future scientists. 18 BA-, MA-, and PhD-level students spent ten days learning about the Wadden Sea World Heritage Site and the intricate aspects of its ecology, nature conservation, sustainable development, and management (TWSC, 2025).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Mostly Effective
Several threats outside of the Wadden Sea have an impact on the Wadden Sea OUV’s. Examples are climate change/coastal protection, sea level rise, tourism, shipping and ports or renewable energy and energy from oil and gas. These aspects are key topics in the new SIMP (CWSS 2023). Climate change adaptation measures in the Wadden Sea are guided by the Trilateral Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (CCAS) towards a climate-resilient Wadden Sea ecosystem. Whilst the World Heritage property has no buffer zone, the three Wadden Sea states have legislative protection regimes in place that reach beyond the designated World Heritage area, such as EU Natura 2000 Directives. The current management is in many cases adequate to maintain the site’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) to the extent possible, but there are also improvements necessary. Various NGOs argued in several letters to UNESCO and in comments on the SOC-Reports that impacts such as by gas and oil exploration, salt mining, LNG terminals, cable construction, harbour extension and mud deposit would, together with many other activities and impacts having a cumulative effect on the World Heritage values. These would potentially risk the OUV of the Wadden Sea (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Mostly Effective
The management is effective and adaptive, and supported by large-scale monitoring data as presented in the periodic Quality Status Reports. There are serious challenges concerning fisheries monitoring and management, due to intersecting responsibilities, commercial fisheries management in the three countries and high political pressure. The SIMP was published in 2023 (CWSS, 2023) which has greatly improved coordination amongst management authorities and overall governance. The management system of the Wadden Sea World Heritage Site is a combination of existing national protection and management systems and trilaterally coordinated management of the Cooperation Area. Overall, the current management is in many cases adequate to maintain the site’s OUV, but there are also improvements necessary.
Effective protection and management protocols are underpinned by excellent cooperation between the three States Parties such that there is institutional, financial and technical capacity to maintain the values and integrity of the site. The greatest management challenge is in maintaining the values of the site in the context of the globally-driven threat of climate change through effective on-site interventions to increase resilience and adapt to sea level rise and other climate change associated threats, which will undoubtedly impact the site's World Heritage values. Indeed, the Wadden Sea Plan is a good example in managing a number of serious threats to the site from beyond its borders, and it is expected that protection and management will be further strengthened in the next years by the implementation of the 2023 approved Single Integrated Management Plan. Overall, the current management is in many cases adequate to maintain the site’s OUV, but there are also further improvements necessary, for example regarding law enforcement and the fisheries and shipping legislation.
Good practice examples
The Wadden Sea Plan and the SIMP are good example in managing a number of serious threats to the site.

Depositional coastline of unparalleled scale and diversity

Good
Trend
Stable
The natural processes continue mostly uninterrupted across the vast majority of the World Heritage site, and the Wadden Sea remains one of the most dynamic and valuable tidal areas in the world. Considerable past interference (prior to inscription) (IUCN, 2009), through halting channel migration, fixation of dunes, blocking overwash transport and developing and protecting tidal marshes (Kloepper et al., 2017) raises management challenges in how to maintain these processes through ongoing management interventions in the context of a changing climate (Kloepper et al., 2017). Since then, there were some small cases where natural processes were re-established, and there are probably more cases to come. At the same time the naturalness of the sediment processes close to the mouth of river Elbe (and also at other estuaries) has been reduced due to further deepening of this estuary. More effort is required to understand the relative importance of the major sediment transport processes in order to respond to sea level rise and other climate change associated threats in the future (Kloepper et al., 2017).

One of the last remaining natural large-scale intertidal ecosystems with natural processes continuing to function largely undisturbed

Low Concern
Trend
Improving
These processes continue to function well within the intertidal ecosystems despite considerable interference in the past (prior to inscription) (IUCN, 2009). Natural dynamics occur mainly on the uninhabited parts of the site, such as the the barrier islands without coastal protection and uninhabited islets. However, to keep the Wadden Sea healthy despite sea level rise, nature restoration projects will be necessary, especially in inhabited areas. Initial projects such as the opening of summer dikes achieved success in restoring some of the natural dynamic processes (CWSS, 2010). Further projects such as the dune activation projects in the Netherlands have also been shown to increase dynamics (Kloepper et al., 2017), which will enhance ecosystem functionality. Some concerns have, however, been raised in the ongoing function of estuarine system, particularly the rivers Elbe, Weser and Ems, which experience high levels of industrial activity which has led to impacts on morphology, hydrography (including tidal amplitude), and loss of freshwater and brackish marshes (Kloepper et al., 2017), albeit some of which occurred before inscription with the subsequent implementation of Habitat and Water Framework Directives now improving the situation (Kloepper et al., 2017). In recent years Integrated Management Plans were developed for the estuaries of Elbe, Weser and Ems. In these plans, mainly developed within the framework of Natura 2000, measures required towards achieving the good status for habitats and species have been outlined. Measures for restoring foreland habitats are covered for most parts, whereas measures targeting aquatic habitats (dredging, dumping, fisheries) due to a lack also of political power are covered to a lesser extent.
Nevertheless, the plans are a major step forward towards meeting the target. It is becoming increasingly obvious, that achieving the good status is a long term process, especially in the Ems Estuary due to the very specific situation and the strong linkage to restoring tidal dynamics (Schuchardt and Scholle, 2017).

Key site for migratory waders and waterfowl

High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
The Wadden Sea remains of low concern overall as a key site for migratory birds along the East Atlantic Flyway. Monitoring of all the bird species in the World Heritage site is thorough and well established, with monitoring and population development calculations in the entire Wadden Sea having taken place for almost 30 years (e.g. Ens et al., 2009; Laursen et al., 2010; Hôtker et al., 2010; van Roomen et al., 2012; Koffijberg, 2015; Blew et al., 2016; Thorup et al., 2016; Kloepper et al., 2017; van Roomen et al. 2025).

According to the most recent QSR (Kleefstra et al. 2022) the number of species with a negative long-term trend went up from five to 16 in the first three QSRs, but now dropped once again to 13 species, while the number of species with a positive trend did not change substantially: eight in 2004, eight in 2009, six in 2017 and seven in 2022. The same is true for species with stable numbers: 15 in 2004, 12 in 2009, 12 in 2017 and 14 in 2022. The short-term trends show fewer changes, apart from the QSR from 2004. The number of increasing, stable and decreasing species were pretty consistent in the QSR’s of 2009, 2017 and 2022. In comparison with the QSR of 2017 more species show an increase in the short and long term, while the number of decreasing species went down in the long term (but not short term).

Factors inside the World Heritage site potentially impacting breeding, migrating and wintering birds negatively include indirect effects of fisheries activity (available food resources) and direct effects of human disturbance (incl. hunting and tourism) and predation (especially during the breeding season) (IUCN Consultation, 2017). As with the other values, climate change represents the greatest threat through disappearing foraging and breeding habitat by sea-level rise, alterations in the food web and emerging phenological mismatches, both inside the site and along the Flyway (Reneerkens, 2020).

In the framework of the Wadden Sea Flyway Initiative, fourth total count documented a remarkable 233 waterbird species, tallying over 20 million individuals, with nearly 70% belonging to 67 dominant species in EAF coastal sites (Agblonon et al. 2023). Long-term trends of 35 species and sub-species of migratory birds in the Wadden Sea over the last 36 years show increasing numbers for 9 species, stable trends for 12 species and a decline in numbers for 14 species. Short term trends show a slightly more positive picture with 10 species increasing, stable (or uncertain) trends for 14 species and a decline for 11 species. Species that increased in both the long and short term are Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia), Eurasian Wigeon (Mareca penelope), Northern Pintail (Anas acuta), Northern Shoveler (Spatula clypeata), Common Ringed Plover (Charadrius hiaticula) (psammodroma/tundrae-subspecies), Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) and Sanderling (Calidris alba). Species that have shown a positive trend in the short term but not in the long term are Common Teal (Anas crecca), Common Ringed Plover (hiaticula-subspecies), European Golden Plover (Pluvialis apricaria) and Ruff (Calidris pugnax). Species that continue to decline in both the long and short term are Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), Common Eider (trend starts 1992/93), Eurasian Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus), Pied Avocet (Recurvirostra avosetta), Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa lapponica) (taymyrensis-subspecies), Common Redshank (Tringa totanus) (totanus-subspecies), Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres) (Scandinavian-Western Russian population), European Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) and Great Black-backed Gull (L. marinus). The
numbers of Curlew Sandpipers (Calidris ferruginea) and Eurasian Curlews (Numenius arquata) have decreased in the short but not in the long term. In the long term, the Danish and Dutch parts of the Wadden Sea show the highest numbers of positive trends (for 16 and 17 species respectively), whereas in the German parts of the Wadden Sea many species decrease in number (20 in Schleswig-Holstein and 22 in Lower Saxony). In the short term, this picture hardly differs for the Danish Wadden Sea, but the number of species that still show an increase is much smaller in the Dutch part (8), where many species show a stable and/or uncertain recent trend (20 species). The latter also applies to the German parts of the Wadden Sea (22 and 17 species stable or uncertain in Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony respectively) and fewer species show a negative trend (6 and 16 respectively) (Kleefstra, et al. 2025).

The Wadden Sea is developing a new action plan focused on improving breeding success for birds, particularly addressing the impact of predation. This will involve a workshop in September 2025, and the insights gained will contribute to updating the Breeding Bird Action Plan.

Overall, given the climate change issues along the entire flyway up to the Arctic, the pressure on feeding and breeding habitats by the advancing sea level rise, and also the pressure from growing numbers of mammalian predators on the breeding population of coastal birds in the Wadden Sea (most of then also migratory along the flyway), the state is considered to be of "High Concern" and the trend "Deteriorating".

Exceptional species richness in a salt marsh

Low Concern
Trend
Stable
There is no indication of significant change in species richness since inscription in 2009, when baseline data (e.g. Marencic, 2009; Wolf et al., 2010) was collected.
Seagrass populations have seemingly reached their optimum extent in the last five years following a steady increase in bed area since the mid-1990s (Kloepper et al., 2017), and new meadows have even appeared south of the Rottums and near Griend in the Netherlands (Kloepper et al., 2017). The most recent QSR shows the natural expansion of salt marshes has continued with a natural expansion of the barrier-connected island salt marshes and foreland salt marshes in Schleswig-Holstein. The total salt-marsh area in the Wadden Sea increased by roughly 6,000 ha since the first trilateral survey of 1995/2001 (Elschot et al. 2024).

Subtidal habitats are reported to have shown an overall increase in quality and quantity since 2010 according to mapping of the subtidal zone of the Wadden Sea (Kloepper et al., 2017). Although not explicitly quantified, it can be assumed that human activities in the Wadden Sea, such as bottom-contacting fishing, dredging and coastal protection measures, can lead to habitat destruction and thus alter natural dynamics. However, to our knowledge, the extent of such impacts has not changed significantly since the last QSR. On the other hand, first measures have been taken in the Netherlands to exclude shrimp- and mussel seed fisheries in parts of the Wadden Sea and in 2021 these areas were further extended. Since 2017 some more areas in the Schleswig-Holstein Wadden Sea have come closer to the goal of an increase of geomorphologically and biologically undisturbed subtidal areas, as mussel fishing was prohibited. However, shrimp fishing is still allowed. That means that the third Wadden Sea Plan goal of an increased area of, and a more natural distribution and development of natural mussel beds and Sabellaria reefs is still quite far from being reached (Ricklefs et al. 2022). The increasing number of invasive species like the Pacific oyster (see thematic report on Alien Species) in a certain sense can be considered as a further dynamic impact on the Wadden Sea, but certainly also as a loss of naturalness as key feature of Wadden Sea conservation. It was found that pure sublittoral mussel beds no longer occur north of the Elbe River. Only mixed beds of mussels and oysters still exist here (Oyssel beds). Furthermore, there are indications that in these beds the number of blue mussels is decreasing while that of oysters is increasing and oysters are increasingly also colonising seafloor areas without any hard substrate. Hard substrates on the other hand, at least in the North Frisian Wadden Sea, are increasingly formed by the invasive slipper limpet (Crepidula fornicata) (Ricklefs et al. 2022).

Some salt marshes, particularly on the mainland coast, are in a rather bad shape, in particular due to heavy coastal engineering impacts such as strong drainage systems. Careful restoration projects as part of the daily management of the competent authorities are required for those sites and could certainly increase species richness there and return to a more 'natural' state (Kloepper et al., 2017). Such restoration projects are likely to begin being implemented soon under the EU Nature Restoration Law, including the opening of summer dikes and re-wetting efforts.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Stable
Excellent monitoring indicates that the natural values in the Wadden Sea World Heritage site are for the most part being conserved and are of low concern overall. A number of fluctuations in numbers of migratory and breeding waterbirds over the last decades have been recorded, with some important declines e.g. for some arctic waders, as well as increases. More studies to determine the reasons for any declines and to understand appropriate management responses are under way. Marine mammal populations are also intensively studied and indicate positive trends. Nevertheless, with increasing impacts from climate change and the associated sea level rise there is some serious concern to what extent the biotic and abiotic natural components of the site are resilient to changes, especially considering the additional pressures from development-related activities, including fishing, gas, salt and oil exploration and renewable energy developments.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
Low Concern
Stable
Based on Unger at al. 2022: The Wadden Sea harbour seal population has been recovering from severe overhunting in the 20th century. The estimated population size grew from less than 4,000 in 1975, when the trilateral coordinated monitoring started, to 40,000 animals in 2012, and as such it is currently the largest harbour seal population in Europe. Since ca. 2012, the population growth has stagnated, despite a growing pup production (~10,000 in 2020), representing more than 25% relative to the estimated population size. In 2024, 8,230 harbour seal pups and 23,772 moulting seals were counted. The results from the last decade indicate a change in population trend and a decline over the last five years in the Wadden Sea harbour seal population. Studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms for these changes (Galatius et al. 2024).

Clear growth in the number of grey seals has been observed in the Wadden Sea Area (including Helgoland), since immigrants from the UK started to recolonize the area in the mid-20th century. Numbers counted during the moult have reached a total of over 9,000 and almost 2,000 pups were counted in the season of 2020-2021. Grey seals have been observed throughout the Wadden Sea countries, though approximately 75% of the moulting seals and 58% of the pups are observed in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Compared to the 2023-2024 period, both the counts of grey seal pups and the counts of moulting grey seals in the Wadden Sea and Helgoland were higher in 2024-2025. A total of 3,051 seal pups and 12,064 moulting seals were counted. The pup production has shown an average annual growth rate of 12% over the past five years, while the numbers of grey seals counted during the moult have increased at an annual rate of 10% during the same period. It should be noted that these results present relative changes in abundance. Obtaining absolute abundance estimates of grey seals in the Wadden Sea would require assessing the proportion of seals in the water during the surveys and understanding the proportion that can or should be considered local (Schop et al. 2025).

Currently, it is not possible to assess if there is a viable stock of harbour porpoises in the World Heritage Site, as site-specific information on abundance and reproductive capacity is lacking. A recent trend analysis based on aerial survey data from the German national monitoring scheme revealed a decrease in harbour porpoise abundance in northern areas of the Wadden Sea region west of Sylt and an increase in more southern areas between Borkum and the Elbe estuary (Nachtsheim et al., 2021).

Additional information

Outdoor recreation and tourism
Beneficiaries include local and regional businesses that rely on tourism, and the tourists themselves. The World Heritage site is visited by over 10 million visitors annually (30-40 million day-trippers). Mudflat-walking, mostly guided, has become popular among tourists.
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Overexploitation
Impact level - High
Trend - Continuing
Wilderness and iconic features
While it is difficult to consider the site as true “wilderness” (seeing that man-made structures can be perceived from much of the area), at the same time large areas of muddy sandflats with no perceptible human influence still exist. In a European context this is very rare and is of great value in a regional context.
Importance for research
The site has been inscribed as “one of the best-studied coastal areas on the planet, providing lessons of wider scientific importance for wetland and coastal management of international importance”.
Fishing areas and conservation of fish stocks
Area is an essential reserve for fish spawning and continues to be used for fisheries (mussels, shrimps). However, present fisheries should be better monitored and the effect on the site’s values minimized, by less bycatch, less intensity and leaving  large areas unfished, while at the same time maintaining a regional and sustainable coastal fishery fully in line with the protection requirements.  
Factors negatively affecting provision of this benefit
Climate change
Impact level - Low
Trend - Increasing
Pollution
Impact level - Low
Trend - Continuing
Overexploitation
Impact level - High
Trend - Continuing
Invasive species
Impact level - Low
Trend - Continuing
Carbon sequestration,
Flood prevention
Large areas of undeveloped coastal land with continuing sedimentation processes provide environmental services in flood reduction (including lessons learned) and probably contribute to climate change mitigation.
This large area of undeveloped or little developed coastal and marine habitats provides a wide array of benefits to the large numbers of people who live within or just outside of the World Heritage site or which come as visitors. In addition to nature conservation and wilderness values, the site provides a wide range of ecosystem services, furnishes a wealth of scientific knowledge, experiences with nature restoration and climate adaptation measures, and provides jobs, particularly through tourism but also from fisheries, park management, research and education.
Organization Brief description of Active Projects Website
1 Common Wadden Sea Secretariat Upon request by UNESCO, the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation (TWSC) aims to strengthen cooperation on management and research activities with States Parties on the African Eurasian Flyways, which play a significant role in conserving migratory species along these flyways. The Wadden Sea Flyway Initiative (WSFI) was launched in 2012 to implement this request.
https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/breeding-and-migratory-birds
2 Numerous research and conservation projects Numerous research and conservation projects are undertaken in the site by the three State Parties and also by NGOs, too numerous to list them all here.
e.g. https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/projects-and-activities-partnership-hub
3 erk Fryslân (lead partner), Economic Board Groningen, National Park De Alde Feânen, NHL Stenden, Waterschap Hunze en Aa’s, Ost Friesland Tourismus GmbH, Internationale Dollard Route, Nationalpark Verwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer, Ökowerk Emden, and Hochschule Emden Leer. The Wadden Visie project helps to promote sustainability in the Wadden Sea region. We aim to better protect the landscape while also strengthening the quality of life and the economy. That’s why we are developing a dashboard to measure how sustainable the region is. This project provides insights into how the area is developing in terms of the environment, society, and economy. We also share good examples of sustainable projects so that other businesses can learn from them. The project has four parts: 1. Sustainability Dashboard We want the Wadden Sea region to become one of the most sustainable destinations in Europe. To achieve this, we measure three types of indicators: ecology, economy, and quality of life. We discuss these insights with stakeholders to ensure a good balance among these indicators. In this part, we are developing a dashboard that shows how sustainable the leisure and tourism sector is in the region. This dashboard will be accessible to everyone and will display key data on the environment, landscape, quality of life, and economy in the region. Coordinator: Merk Fryslân 2. CO2 Compensation This part focuses on reducing CO2 emissions in the Wadden Sea region. We are developing and testing methods to help tourism businesses offset their CO2 emissions. This not only helps the companies but also strengthens nature in the region. Coordinator: Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer 3. Experiencing Wilderness and Preserving Nature We want people to better know and appreciate the beautiful nature of the Wadden Sea region. That’s why we are developing wilderness experiences to raise awareness. We also help manage visitor flows in natural areas to ensure that the environment is not harmed. Coordinator: Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer 4. Biodiversity Development This part focuses on improving biodiversity in the region around the Wadden Sea. We want to better prepare the plants and animals in the area for climate change. We also raise awareness among residents and visitors about the importance of biodiversity by developing several biodiversity hotspots. Coordinator: Ökowerk Emden
https://deutschland-nederland.eu/en/projects/wattenvision-waddenvisie/
4 Wadden Sea National Park in Schleswig-Holstein and in Denmark, Nordsee Tourismus Service, WWF Germany The Wadden Sea is the region's most important contribution to the planet's nature and a major tourism destination with +20 million overnight stays annually. Tourism must work towards sustainable experience offerings, as a way to better protect the area's unique natural beauty and in line with the economic importance of tourism. The visitors' reason for travelling here is the unique cultural and natural heritage, where they can be actively involved in the protection of the area and thereby gain a better understanding of the area. The task is to balance these demands on both sides of the border. The project will work to fulfill the guest's wish to be involved and connected to the area they are visiting – in other words, to: Shift the focus from what nature can do for you to what you can do for nature.
https://www.interreg-de-dk.eu/dk/projekter-og-resultater/vores-projekter/enkeltvisning-projekter/vabene/
5 The DARKER SKY team includes project partners from universities, national parks, port authorities and municipalities supported by associated partners and external project management experts. DARKER SKY is an Interreg North Sea project (ERDF funding) which aims at reducing light pollution and increasing biodiversity and ecological connectivityin the North Sea Region (France, Germany, the Netherlands & Denmark) by providing municipalities and ports with innovative measuring, monitoring and co-design methodsfor the implementation of environmentally sound and energy-efficient light reduction benefitting biodiversity and communities.
https://www.interregnorthsea.eu/darker-sky
6 Coordinated by WWF Germany and the CWSS The International Wadden Sea School (IWSS) aims to raise awareness of the Wadden Sea as ONE shared nature area among multipliers and users of Wadden Sea education. In an open network the IWSS brings together environmental educationalists from Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands to share experience and approaches to Wadden Sea education and to jointly develop ideas for transnational activities and trilateral resources. A broad pool of multilingual education and edutainment resources are available with a special focus on the Wadden Sea as an entity. They offer multipliers the chance to include a transnational perspective in the various local and regional education activities.
https://www.iwss.org/

References

References
1
Agblonon G., Diallo A. Y., Gueye K., Citegetse G., Crowe O., Langendoen T. & van Roomen M. (eds.) 2023. Simultaneous January 2023 waterbird census along the East Atlantic Flyway: National Reports. Wadden Sea Flyway Initiative p/a Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands, BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/simultaneous-januar…
2
Becherer, J., Hofstede, J., Gräwe, U., Purkiani, K., Schulz, E., & Burchard, H. (2018). The Wadden Sea in transition-consequences of sea level rise. Ocean Dynamics, 68(1), pp.131-151.
3
BirdLIfe (2009). The Wadden Sea: A vision for the conservation of a Natural Heritage. http://www.birdlife.org/europe/pdfs/Waddenvision.pdf
4
Blew, J., Günther, K., Hälterlein, B., Kleefstra, R., Laursen, K. and Scheiffarth, G. (2016). Trends of Migratory and Wintering Waterbirds in the Wadden Sea 1987/1988 - 2013/2014. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 37. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Joint Monitoring Group of Migratory Birds in the Wadden Sea, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/do…
5
Burbridge, P.R. (2000). The Nomination of the Wadden Sea Conservation Area as a World Heritage Site: A Feasibility Study For the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation/ Common Wadden Sea Secretariat. 29 pp.
6
Büttger, H., Christoph, S., Buschbaum, C., Gittenberger, A., Jensen, K., Kabuta, S., Lackschewitz, D. (2022). Alien Species. Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/index.php/reports/a…
7
CWSS (2010). Wadden Sea Plan 2010. Eleventh Trilateral Governmental Conference on the Protection of the Wadden Sea. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
8
CWSS (2012). The Wadden Sea, Germany and Netherlands (N1314) - Extension Denmark and Germany. Nomination file for Danish extension to the WHC.
9
CWSS (2013). Aerial surveys of Harbour Seals in the Wadden Sea in 2013. Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/resources/2013-grey…
10
CWSS (2014). Ministerial Council Declaration. 12th Trilateral Governmental Conference on the Protection of the Wadden Sea, Trilateral Wadden Sea Governmental Council Meeting, Tønder, 5 February 2014. Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/resources/2014-tønd…
11
CWSS (2016). Report on the State of Conservation of the World Heritage property “The Wadden Sea (N1314)”. Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
12
CWSS (2020a). Alien Species. [online] Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/alien-species (Accessed 17 September 2020).
13
CWSS (2020b). Shaping a Sustainable Tomorrow - Wadden Sea Strategy on Education for Sustainable Development and World Heritage Interpretation. [online] Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/resources/education… (Accessed 18 September 2020). 
14
CWSS (2023). The SIMP Integrated Management Plan for ONE Wadden Sea World Heritage. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/sites/default/files…
15
Claessens, M., De Meester, S., Van Landuyt, L., De Clerck, K., Janssen, C.R. (2011). Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in marine sediments along the Belgian coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 62: 2199-2204.
16
Common Wadden Sea Secretariat (2025). Freemantle Highway incident underlines relevance of Wadden Sea’s PSSA designation. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat. Published online 3 August 2023. Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/freemantle-highway-…
17
Common Wadden Sea Secretariat (2025). New project on climate resilience for East Atlantic Flyway approved. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat. Published online 7 April 2025. Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/news/new-project-cl…
18
Corder, M. (2020). Report highlights risks for container ships in Wadden Sea. Associated Press. [online] Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/report-highlights-risks-for… (Accessed 18 September 2020). 
19
Dekiff, JH., Remy, D., Klasmeier, J., Fries, E. (2014). Occurrence and spatial distribution of microplastics in sediments from Norderney. Environmental Pollution, 186, pp.248-256.
20
Dittmann T., Becker P.H., Bakker J., Bignert A., Nyberg E., Pereira M.G., Pijanowska U., Shore R., Stienen E., Toft G.O. & Marencic H. (2012). Large-scale spatial pollution patterns around the North Sea indicated by costal bird eggs within an EcoQO programme. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 19: 4060-4072.
21
Elschot K., Esselink P., Frikke J., Jensen K., Janinhoff-Verdaat N., Paarup Thomsen M., Padlat M., van der Wal J.T., van Duin W.E., van Puijenbroek M.E.B., Rupprecht F. & Stock M. (2024) Salt Marshes. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated: 06.11.2024. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/salt-marshe…
22
Ens, B. J., Smaal, A. C., & De Vlas, J. (2004). The effects of shellfish fishery on the ecosystems of the Dutch Wadden Sea and Oosterschelde: final report on the second phase of the scientific evaluation of the Dutch shellfish fishery policy (EVA II) (No. 1011). Alterra.
23
Europarc Consulting (2012). Facts and Figures of the Wadden Sea Region. Part I of the Baseline Study for the Strategy for Sustainable Tourism in the Wadden Sea. Prowad Protect and Prosper: Sustainable Tourism in the Wadden Sea, co-financed by Interreg IVE North Sea Region Programme and EU European Regional Development Fund.
24
Fries, E., Dekiff, J.H., Willmeyer, J., Nuelle, M.-T., Ebert, M., Remy, D. (2013). Identification of polymer types and additives in marine microplastic particles using pyrolysis-GC/MS and scanning electron microscopy. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, 15, pp.1949-1956.
25
Galatius, A., Brackmann, J., Brasseur, S., Diederichs, B., Jeß, A., Klöpper, S., Körber, P., Schop, J., Siebert, U., Teilmann, J., Thøstesen, B. and Schmidt, B. (2020) Trilateral surveys of Harbour Seals in the Wadden Sea and Helgoland in 2020. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
26
Galatius, A., Brasseur, S. M. J. M., Hamm, T., Jeß, A., Meise, K., Meyer, J., Schop, J., Siebert, U., Stejskal, O., Teilmann, J., & Thøstesen, C. B. (2024). Survey Results of Harbour Seals in the Wadden Sea in 2024: Sustained declines of both pups and moulting seals. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Expert Group Marine Mammals. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15731099
27
Gittenberger, A. (2016). Alien species of the Wadden Sea database. Issued by Office of risk assessment and research, the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority.
28
Günther W. (2022). Wadden Sea Tourism Radar. Recognising boundaries – preserving values: Developing sustainable tourism for the Wadden Sea World Heritage Site. A guideline for destinations. WWF Deutschland, Berlin. Online: www.wwf.de/themen-projekte/projektregionen/wattenmeer/touri….
29
Hartman, S., Arnegger, J. & Gulisova, B. (2022) Tourism. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report . Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated 06.09.2022. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/tourism#sub…
30
Hartman, S., Arnegger, J., Gulisova, B. (2022). Tourism. Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/index.php/reports/t…
31
Heron S.F., Day J.C., Zijlstra R., Engels B., Weber A., Marencic H and Busch J.A. (2020). Workshop report: Climate Risk Assessment for Wadden Sea World Heritage property. Application of the Climate Vulnerability Index – Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) Vulnerability. 68 pages. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
32
IUCN (2009). World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation, The Wadden Sea (Germany/The Netherlands). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2009, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. WHC/09/33.COM/INF.8B2. [online] Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp.16-28. Available at: <https://whc.unesco.org/document/152335>; [Accessed November 2020].
33
Jager, Zwanette (2015). Conservation Management of Fish Populations in the Wadden Sea. Hamburg, 8-9 January 2015 - Workshop Report. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat. 26 pp.
http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/do…
34
Kleefstra R., Bregnballe T., Frikke J., Günther K., Hälterlein B., Hansen M.B., Hornman M., Meyer J. & Scheiffarth G. (2022). Migratory birds. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated: 06.09.2022. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/migratory-b…
35
Kleefstra, R., Behm, K., Bregnballe, T., Frikke, J., Günther, K., Hälterlein, B., Hansen, M.B., Hornman, M., Meyer, J., Scheiffarth. (2025). Change in migrating and wintering waterbirds in the Wadden Sea (eds). East Atlantic Flyway Assessment 2023: The status of coastal waterbird populations and their sites. Wadden Sea Flyway Initiative p/a CWSS, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands, BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15355685
36
Kloepper, S., Baptist, M. J., Bostelmann, A., Busch, J.A., Buschbaum, C., Gutow, L., Janssen, G., Jensen, K., Jørgensen, H.P., de Jong, F., Lüerßen, G., Schwarzer, K., Strempel, R. & Thieltges, D. (2017). Wadden Sea Quality Status Report 2017. [online] Common Wadden Sea Secretariat. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/ (Accessed 17 September 2020). 
37
Koffijberg, K., Laursen, K., Hälterlein, B., Reichert, G., Frikke, J. and Soldaat, L. (2015). Trends of Breeding Birds in the Wadden Sea 1991 - 2013. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 35. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Joint Monitoring Group of Breeding Birds in the Wadden Sea, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/do…
38
Konyssova, G., Sidorenko, V., Androsov, A., Sander, L., Danilov, S., Rubinetti, S., ... & Wiltshire, K. H. (2025). Changes in tidal dynamics in response to sea level rise in the Sylt-Rømø Bight (Wadden Sea). Ocean Dynamics, 75(5), 43.
39
Kraan, C., Van Gils, J. A., Spaans, B., Dekinga, A., Bijleveld, A. I., Van Roomen, M., ... & Piersma, T. (2009). Landscape‐scale experiment demonstrates that Wadden Sea intertidal flats are used to capacity by molluscivore migrant shorebirds. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78(6), 1259-1268.
40
Laursen, K., Blew, J., Eskildsen, K., Günther, K., Hälterlein, B., Kleefstra, R., Lüerssen, G., Potel, P., and Schrader, S. (2010). Migratory Waterbirds in the Wadden Sea 1987- 2008. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No.30. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Joint Monitoring Group of Migratory Birds in the Wadden Sea, Wilhelmshaven, Germany (available online at: http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/do…).
41
MELUR (Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein). (2015). Strategie für das Wattenmeer 2100. Online: http://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Fachinhalte/N/nationalp….
42
Marencic, H. (2009). The Wadden Sea - Introduction. Thematic Report No. 1. In: Marencic, H. & Vlas, J. de (Eds), 2009. Quality Status Report 2009. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 25. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
43
Miljøstyrelsen (2017). Fiskeriterritoriet og reservater. Vadehavet. [online, map]. Available at: mst.dk/media/129515/vadehavet-kortbilag-1.pdf
44
OSPAR (2007). Background document on the EcoQO on mercury and organohalogens in seabird eggs. OSPAR Commission, Assessment and Monitoring series, No. 331.
45
OSPAR (2009). EcoQO Handbook - Handbook for the application of Ecological Quality Objectives in the North Sea. Second Edition - 2009. OSPAR Biodiversity Series Publication 307/2009. OSPAR Commission London, 65 pp.
46
PROWAD (2014). Sustainable Tourism in the Wadden Sea World Heritage Destination. PROWAD – Protect and Prosper: Sustainable Tourism in the Wadden Sea’, co-financed by the Interreg IVB North Sea Region Programme (www.prowad.org).
47
Ricklefs, K., Franken, O., Glorius S., Mascioli F., Nielsen P., Reimers H.-C. & Trampe, A. (2022) Subtidal habitats. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated 06.09.2022. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/subtidal-ha…
48
Schop, J., Bönisch, A., Brasseur, S. M. J. M., Galatius, A., Hamm, T., Jeß, A., Meise, K., Meyer, J., Stejskal, O., Siebert, U., Teilmann, J., & Thøstesen, C. B. (2025). Grey Seal Numbers in the Wadden Sea and Helgoland in 2024-2025. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Expert Group Marine Mammals. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15728315
49
Schuchardt B. & Scholle J. (2017) Estuaries. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated 21.12.2017. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/estuaries#s…
50
Schumacher J. Scherer, B, Schumacher A. (2023). Wie wirksam ist der Schutz in deutschen Meeresschutzgebieten – dargestellt am Beispiel des Nationalparks Schleswig-Holsteinisches Wattenmeer. Natur und Recht 45: 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10357-023-4207-9.
51
TWSC - Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation (2025). Report on the State of Conservation of the World Heritage property “The Wadden Sea (N1314)”. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1314/documents/
52
Thienen-Visser, V., Breunese, J. N., & Muntendam-Bos, A. G. (2015). Subsidence due to gas production in the Wadden Sea: How to ensure no harm will be done to nature. In 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association.
53
Thorup, O. and Koffijberg, K. (2016). Breeding success in the Wadden Sea 2009-2012 A review. Ecosystem No. 36. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/do…
54
UNESCO (2024). Report on the State of Conservation of The Wadden Sea (Denmark, Germany and The Netherlands). State of Conservation Information System of the World Heritage Centre. [online] Paris, France. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1314/documents/
55
Unger B., Baltzer J., Brackmann J., Brasseur S., Brügmann M., Diederichs B., Galatius A., Geelhoed S.C.V , Huus Petersen H., IJsseldijk L.L., Jensen T. K., Jess A., Nachtsheim D., Philipp C., Scheidat M., Schop J., Siebert U., Teilmann J., Thøstesen C.B. & van Neer A. (2022) Marine mammals. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated: 06.09.2022. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/marine-mamm…
56
Unger, B., Herr, H., Benke, H., Böhmert, M., Burkhardt-Holm, P., Dähne, M., Hillmann, M., Wolff-Schmidt, K., Wohlsein, P., Siebert, U. (2017). Marine debris in harbour porpoises and seals from German waters. Marine Environmental Research, 130, pp.77-84.
57
Vermeersen, B. L., Slangen, A. B., Gerkema, T., Baart, F., Cohen, K. M., Dangendorf, S., ... & Jevrejeva, S. (2018). Sea-level change in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 97(3), pp.79-127
58
WWF (2012). Energy Production and Nature Conservation in the Wadden Sea Region and the Wadden Sea: Future Perspectives. Presentation at Wadden Sea Day, 30 August 2012. Available at: http://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/120830…
59
WWF (2014). Klimaschutz und -anpassung im Wattenmeer [online]. WWF Deutschland, updated 22 February 2016. Available at: http://www.wwf.de/watt/klima
60
Wadden Sea Board (2025). Revised Climate Change Adaptation Strategy. Submitted by CWSS, EG-C. Wadden Sea Board (WSB 45). 28 May 2025, Hamburg, Germany. Available at: https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/system/files/WSB-45…
61
World Heritage Committee (2009). Decision: 33 COM 8B.4 The Wadden Sea Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (Germany, Netherlands). In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd Session (Seville, 2014). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, pp.183-186. Available at: <http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/1946>; [Accessed November 2020].
62
World Heritage Committee. (2014). Decision: 38 COM 8B.13. Wadden Sea (Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands). In: Report of decisions of the 38th session of the World Heritage Committee. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6098 [Accessed 24 September 2020].
63
van Beusekom, J., Carstensen, J., Dolch, T., Grage, A., Hofmeister, R., Kerimoglu, O., ... & Rönn, L. (2019). Wadden Sea Eutrophication: long-term trends and regional differences. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 370.
64
van Katwijk, M. M., van Beusekom, J. E., Folmer, E. O., Kolbe, K., de Jong, D. J., & Dolch, T. (2024). Seagrass recovery trajectories and recovery potential in relation to nutrient reduction. Journal of Applied Ecology, 61(8), 1784-1804.
65
van Roomen M., Agblonon G., Citegetse G., Crowe O., Langendoen T., Nagy S., Schekkerman H. & van Winden E. (2022) East Atlantic Flyway. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report. Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated 06.09.2022. Available at: https://qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/east-atlant…
66
van Roomen, M., Laursen, K., van Turnhout, C., van Winden, E., Blewc, J., Eskildsen, K., Günther, K., Hälterlein, B., Kleefstra, R., Potel, P., Schrader, S., Luerssen, G., and Ens, B. J. (2012). Signals from the Wadden sea: Population declines dominate among waterbirds depending on intertidal mudflats. Ocean & Coastal Management 68: 79-88.
67
van Roomen, M., Reneerkens, J., Citegetse, G., Crowe, O., Gueye, K., Langendoen, T., Dodman, T., Meise, K., & Schekkerman, H. (2025). East Atlantic Flyway Assessment 2023. The status of coastal waterbird populations and their sites. Wadden Sea Flyway Initiative p/a CWSS, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands, BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15423626

Indigenous Heritage values

Would you like to share feedback to support the accuracy of information for this site? If so, send your comments below.

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.