Ningaloo Coast
Country
Australia
Inscribed in
2011
Criteria
(vii)
(x)
The conservation outlook for this site has been assessed as "significant concern" in the latest assessment cycle. Explore the Conservation Outlook Assessment for the site below. You have the option to access the summary, or the detailed assessment.
The 604,500 hectare marine and terrestrial property of Ningaloo Coast, on the remote western coast of Australia, includes one of the longest near-shore reefs in the world. On land the site features an extensive karst system and network of underground caves and water courses. Annual gatherings of whale sharks occur at Ningaloo Coast, which is home to numerous marine species, among them a wealth of sea turtles. The terrestrial part of the site features subterranean water bodies with a substantial network of caves, conduits, and groundwater streams. They support a variety of rare species that contribute to the exceptional biodiversity of the marine and terrestrial site © UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Finalised on
11 Oct 2025
Significant concern
Current state and trend of VALUES
High Concern
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
Exceptional landscape combining arid terrestrial and marine features
Criterion
(vii)
The landscapes and seascapes of the property are comprised of mostly intact and large-scale marine, coastal and terrestrial environments. The lush and colourful underwater scenery provides a stark and spectacular contrast with the arid and rugged land (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011).
One of the largest documented aggregation of whale sharks in the world
Criterion
(vii)
The property supports rare and large aggregations of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) along with important aggregations of other fish species and marine mammals. The annual mass coral spawning and seasonal nutrient upwelling cause a peak in productivity that leads to aggregations along the Ningaloo Coast of approximately 300-500 whale sharks, making this one of the largest documented aggregations in the world (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011).
High diversity of marine fish
Criterion
(x)
High marine diversity of more than 700 reef fish species and many marine pelagic species including whale sharks are found in the site (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011). Manta rays (Mobula alfredi) are abundant in the reserve and are found on the outer reef and in the lagoon. Nineteen species of shark including the black-tip reef shark, white-tip reef shark, hammerhead shark, tawny nurse shark, oceanic white tip shark, tiger shark, blue shark- and grey reef shark - occur in the lagoon and deeper waters. The Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Area and adjacent Exmouth Gulf host all life stages of the critically endangered Giant Shovelnose Ray (Glaucostegus typus) (Global IUCN Red List). Seven of the eight Pristid, Rhinid and Glaucostegid Rays known to occur around the Australian continent occur within the Ningaloo Coast WHA, including the critically endangered green sawfish (Pristis zijsron) (Bateman et al., 2023). The open ocean supports large aggregations of fish, including trevally, tuna, mackerel, marlin and sailfish, many of which are found much closer to shore than in other parts of the world due to the narrow continental shelf (State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011). Some individual whale sharks have been identified and recorded at Ningaloo Reef for over 20 years (Norman & Morgan, 2016).
High diversity of reptiles
Criterion
(x)
Situated at an ecotone between tropical and temperate waters, the Ningaloo Coast hosts an unusual diversity of marine turtle species with an estimated average of 10,000 nests deposited along the coast annually (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011). Nesting numbers are highly variable from year to year and between species. Marine reptiles include five recorded marine turtle species. Leatherback and loggerhead turtles are listed as endangered and green, hawksbill and flatback turtles are listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act, with four species recorded nesting and three of these nesting in significant numbers (DBCA, 2024). Marine reptiles also include a number of sea snakes species including the Olive sea snake. The Carnarvon Xeric Scrub ecoregion is recognized for its high levels of species richness and endemism, particularly for birds and reptiles (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011).
High diversity of marine mammals
Criterion
(x)
Twenty cetacean species have been recorded in the property with frequent observations of dugong and dolphins (most commonly bottlenose and Australasian humpback dolphins and at least eight species of whales in the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Area and the adjacent Exmouth Gulf). Most notable is the presence of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) migrating through on their annual migration from feeding grounds in Antarctica to calving grounds along the Western Australian coast into the Kimberley. Humpback whales have also been observed calving in the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Area and resting in the adjacent Exmouth Gulf. Pygmy blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda), Blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) have been observed in the offshore regions of the nominated area, as have dwarf minke (Balaenoptera bonaerensis subs.), brydes (Balaenoptera brydei), southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) and killer whales (Orcinus orca) (State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011). Killer whales are frequently observed hunting humpback whales in the area (Pitman et al., 2014).
High diversity of subterranean fauna
Criterion
(x)
The combination of relict rainforest fauna (troglofauna) and small, fully aquatic invertebrates (stygofauna) within the same cave system is exceptional. The caves also support a threatened subterranean fish species; the Cave Gudgeon, Milyeringa veritas. The subterranean fauna of the peninsula is highly diverse and is one of the highest in the world (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011).
Noteworthy arid-zone vascular flora
Criterion
(x)
Terrestrial arid-zone vascular plant diversity is noteworthy (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010).
High diversity of marine invertebrates and algae
Criterion
(x)
More than 50 per cent of Indian Ocean coral species (over 300 species in 54 genera), at least 650 mollusc species, 600 crustacean species, 155 sponge species and an undocumented number of echinoderms including 25 new to science together provide an exceptional diversity of marine invertebrates, supplemented by more than 1,000 species of marine algae (World Heritage Committee, 2011; State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011).
Noteworthy birds
There are at least 200 bird species in the property, eleven of these are at the northern or southern limits of their range, or are otherwise isolated from their main populations. Examples include the western bowerbird (Chlamydera guttara), rufous-crowned emu-wren (Stipiturus ruficeps) and the painted firetail finch (Emblema picta) (State Party of Australia, 2010). The Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Area and the adjacent Exmouth Gulf are important for migratory and resident Shorebirds, enroute the East Asian –Australasian flyway. Notable species include Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis), Bar-tailed Godwits (Limosa lapponica menzbieri), Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea), Great knot (Calidris tenuirostris) where juveniles are year-round residents and adults stop over during the migration. The Cape Range Peninsula belongs to an arid ecoregion recognized for its high levels of species richness and endemism, particularly for birds and reptiles (World Heritage Committee, 2011; IUCN, 2011).
Assessment information
Climate change poses the most significant threat to the long-term conservation of this World Heritage site and it is expected to significantly increase the risk of coral bleaching, sea level rise and cyclonic activity. Notably, the WHA is currently undergoing its most significant coral bleaching event to date. Additionally, CSIRO particularly notes the unknown effects of climate change from an increased risk of drought, catastrophic fire, change in cyclone frequency, increased wave energy, change in the temperature of seawater, ocean acidification, and sea level rise and its associated impacts on coastal communities and habitat (i.e. nesting habitat for turtles). The effectiveness of the site’s management regime minimises threats where possible. Human disturbance, including from recreational activities, especially recreational fishing, continues to be a threat. Although visitation levels are increasing, this threat is being managed. However there is evidence that the management of recreational fishing may require further strengthening to improve effectiveness amidst rising pressure due to human population growth and an increase in visitation generally. Recreational fishing is putting pressure on populations of certain species, as has been documented by recent research, which showed declining population trends of key target species such as emperors, both inside and outside sanctuary zones. Visitor access and recreation activities within and adjacent to the property as well as introduced plants and animals remain major threats, along with fires from artificial sources.
Oil & Gas exploration/development , Mining & Quarrying
(Limestone quarrying, oil and gas operations)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
Limestone quarrying currently occurs inside the site at a modest scale, through an extraction lease; and outside of the site at a larger and expanding scale (State Party of Australia, 2023). Current impacts from oil and gas operations include effects on migratory species, connectivity and ecological linkages within and adjacent to the site. There is potential for an increase in impacts and cumulative impact on OUV including effects on migratory species from seismic testing, drilling, and operations (State Party of Australia, 2023). The waters surrounding the Muiron and Sunday Islands are highly prospective for hydrocarbons and exploration is anticipated to increase in this region over the next decade. Government policy prohibits drilling for petroleum and production within Ningaloo Marine Park but not within the Muiron Islands Marine Management Area (Management Plan for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Muiron Islands Marine Management Area 2005-2015).
Nevertheless, the threat is localised and the Conservation Commission and Department collaborate with other Government bodies such as the Department of Mines and Petroleum and the EPA to prevent or mitigate impacts of mining on conservation reserve values.
Marine conservation reserves are vested in the MPRA under the CALM Act and the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) is responsible for their management. The CALM Act and the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WC Act) and associated regulations provide legislative protection for flora and fauna within the reserves. The CALM Act (Section 13C (1)(2)) states that a marine management area is established “… for the purpose of managing and protecting the marine environment so that it may be used for conservation, recreational, scientific and commercial purposes." Commercial purposes include: mining, within the meaning of the Mining Act 1978; production of petroleum, and associated activities. The Mining Act 1978 (Mining Act) and the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act) generally take precedence over the CALM Act in respect to national parks and other terrestrial reserves, and may override the contents of management plans with regards to mining and petroleum matters. However, exploration and other activities conducted under the Mining Act and the Petroleum Act are subject to conditions intended to prevent or mitigate potential environmental impacts. The need to protect the special attributes of the broader Cape Range area is recognised in the EPA's position statement for the area, which stipulates that development which potentially threatens the maintenance of ecological integrity must demonstrate avoidance or amelioration of those threats (EPA 1999). All mining proposals with the potential to impact on the key values of the conservation reserve system should be referred to the EPA for their consideration of assessment under the Environmental Protection Act (Cape Range National Park Management Plan No 65, 2010).
Drilling for petroleum exploration or production in Ningaloo Marine Park is not permitted. Seismic exploration is permissible in the Park subject to EPA assessment. There are active exploration permits operated by Lansvale Oil and Gas Pty Ltd and Victoria Petroleum Pty Ltd that overlap the Park, however only seismic exploration could be permitted in the Park. The area surrounding the Muiron and Sunday islands is prospective for petroleum and there have previously been drilling operations conducted in the area. The Muiron Islands Marine Management Area does not preclude future petroleum exploration and development in either the conservation areas or un-zoned areas. Any exploration or production activities would be subject to environmental assessment. The primary role of reserve management in relation to hydrocarbon exploration will be to ensure that the reserve values are not impacted by any petroleum activities, in liaison with DoIR and the DoE/EPA (Management Plan for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Muiron Islands Marine Management Area 2005-2015).
There is a risk of oil spills from vessels and production platforms and collisions with reefs, marine wildlife and other vessels adjacent to the World Heritage site. There are several offshore oil and gas extraction operations near the site and a number of pending on- and offshore project proposals, which potentially pose a significant threat to the World Heritage values. Offshore petroleum incidents, such as accidental discharge of oil or other pollutants pose a significant and most likely irreversible threat to the marine life and ecosystems. Spills of other chemicals could also become a more prevalent risk as new fuels are introduced in the shipping industry (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Certain components of the marine fauna found in the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage property could be lost forever in the event of an oil spill, especially coral reefs and sessile invertebrates (IUCN Consultation, 2017). The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) carefully assesses the environmental impacts and risks from petroleum activities through Environment Plans and Oil Pollution Emergency Plans prepared by titleholders. The onus is on the proponent to show where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason to postpone measures to prevent environmental degradation in any proposal or activity. The Western Australian Government and the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Advisory Committee provide advice to industry on activities and environment plans that have the potential to impact the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Nevertheless, the threat is localised and the Conservation Commission and Department collaborate with other Government bodies such as the Department of Mines and Petroleum and the EPA to prevent or mitigate impacts of mining on conservation reserve values.
Marine conservation reserves are vested in the MPRA under the CALM Act and the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) is responsible for their management. The CALM Act and the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WC Act) and associated regulations provide legislative protection for flora and fauna within the reserves. The CALM Act (Section 13C (1)(2)) states that a marine management area is established “… for the purpose of managing and protecting the marine environment so that it may be used for conservation, recreational, scientific and commercial purposes." Commercial purposes include: mining, within the meaning of the Mining Act 1978; production of petroleum, and associated activities. The Mining Act 1978 (Mining Act) and the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act) generally take precedence over the CALM Act in respect to national parks and other terrestrial reserves, and may override the contents of management plans with regards to mining and petroleum matters. However, exploration and other activities conducted under the Mining Act and the Petroleum Act are subject to conditions intended to prevent or mitigate potential environmental impacts. The need to protect the special attributes of the broader Cape Range area is recognised in the EPA's position statement for the area, which stipulates that development which potentially threatens the maintenance of ecological integrity must demonstrate avoidance or amelioration of those threats (EPA 1999). All mining proposals with the potential to impact on the key values of the conservation reserve system should be referred to the EPA for their consideration of assessment under the Environmental Protection Act (Cape Range National Park Management Plan No 65, 2010).
Drilling for petroleum exploration or production in Ningaloo Marine Park is not permitted. Seismic exploration is permissible in the Park subject to EPA assessment. There are active exploration permits operated by Lansvale Oil and Gas Pty Ltd and Victoria Petroleum Pty Ltd that overlap the Park, however only seismic exploration could be permitted in the Park. The area surrounding the Muiron and Sunday islands is prospective for petroleum and there have previously been drilling operations conducted in the area. The Muiron Islands Marine Management Area does not preclude future petroleum exploration and development in either the conservation areas or un-zoned areas. Any exploration or production activities would be subject to environmental assessment. The primary role of reserve management in relation to hydrocarbon exploration will be to ensure that the reserve values are not impacted by any petroleum activities, in liaison with DoIR and the DoE/EPA (Management Plan for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Muiron Islands Marine Management Area 2005-2015).
There is a risk of oil spills from vessels and production platforms and collisions with reefs, marine wildlife and other vessels adjacent to the World Heritage site. There are several offshore oil and gas extraction operations near the site and a number of pending on- and offshore project proposals, which potentially pose a significant threat to the World Heritage values. Offshore petroleum incidents, such as accidental discharge of oil or other pollutants pose a significant and most likely irreversible threat to the marine life and ecosystems. Spills of other chemicals could also become a more prevalent risk as new fuels are introduced in the shipping industry (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Certain components of the marine fauna found in the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage property could be lost forever in the event of an oil spill, especially coral reefs and sessile invertebrates (IUCN Consultation, 2017). The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) carefully assesses the environmental impacts and risks from petroleum activities through Environment Plans and Oil Pollution Emergency Plans prepared by titleholders. The onus is on the proponent to show where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason to postpone measures to prevent environmental degradation in any proposal or activity. The Western Australian Government and the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Advisory Committee provide advice to industry on activities and environment plans that have the potential to impact the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Residential Areas, Commercial & Industrial Areas, Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Urban development)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
The Ningaloo Coast is situated in an isolated location with a small regional population with localised urban development. Ningaloo Coast experiences domestic and international tourism, and direct threats from human activities are relatively low but increasing. Potential development of new boating facilities or tourism accommodation has the potential to impact areas within the World Heritage site. The arid climate results in extremely low levels of runoff. In addition, the Ningaloo Coast Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth, a 30-year strategic land-use plan, limits significant development to the towns of Exmouth and Carnarvon, both of which are outside the nominated area (State Party of Australia, 2010). A future directions paper reviewing the Ningaloo Coast Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth was released for public comment in January 2019 (Western Australian Planning Commission, 2019). The Ningaloo Coast Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth is currently being reviewed (DPLH, 2019). Additional National Park and Conservation reserves have been created along the Ningaloo Coast (September 2024) which have provided a long term buffer from residential and urban development. Water abstraction associated with higher human residency can impact the subterranean fauna and TECs (see potential threats).
Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species, Problematic Native Species
(Feral animals and invasive plant species)
Invasive/problematic species
Vulpes vulpes
Felis catus
Capra hircus
Cherax quadricarinatus
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Invasive alien species, most importantly foxes, cats, goats and weeds on land and some marine species are satisfactorily monitored and controlled (IUCN, 2011). Management efforts have led to the reduction of goat and fox numbers to negligible levels in the past ten years. Feral cats, although reduced in number, continue to persist throughout the terrestrial area and have become a focus of significant control work (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The Redclaw Crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus) which is endemic to the Northern Territory and tropical Queensland is now found throughout the Pilbara and is likely to be introduced to Cape Range wetlands in coming years. The arrival of the Redclaw Crayfish could affect freshwater communities (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Feral species and their potential impacts in the marine environment are poorly understood. For example, the Western Australian Museum and Griffith University recently identified a non-native species of jellyfish (Cassiopeia Xamachana) in the Ningaloo Marine Park, whose origin and potential impacts are not known. Predation of marine turtle hatchlings on beaches by native ghost crabs and native seagulls appears to be unsustainable for populations of marine turtles (particularly loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta) to survive (DBCA unpublished data)
Fire & Fire Management
(Wildfires)
Inside site
, Extent of threat not known
Fires from anthropogenic sources, increased severe weather (lightning strikes) and burning through altered landscapes remain a threat to the terrestrial vegetation (IUCN Consultation, 2017).
A Fire Management Strategy (DCBA Fire Management Strategy, updated 2023) outlines the key strategic priorities for fire management across the breadth of DBCA’s bushfire risk mitigation and suppression responsibilities. Prescribed burns are carried out regularly. The department's Parks and Wildlife Service conducts approximately 130 prescribed burns each year, which are chosen from around 400 prescriptions within the annual Burn Options Program, including areas within the property (DCBA, 2025).
A Fire Management Strategy (DCBA Fire Management Strategy, updated 2023) outlines the key strategic priorities for fire management across the breadth of DBCA’s bushfire risk mitigation and suppression responsibilities. Prescribed burns are carried out regularly. The department's Parks and Wildlife Service conducts approximately 130 prescribed burns each year, which are chosen from around 400 prescriptions within the annual Burn Options Program, including areas within the property (DCBA, 2025).
Recreational Activities
(Tourism and other recreational activities)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Increasing visitation and pressures on natural values, sensitive coastal habitats and ecological communities continue to remain major threats to the property. Visitor numbers have continued to increase together with associated pressures, such as increased recreational fishing and direct impacts on sensitive coastal ecological communities (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Pressure from recreational line fishing, spearfishing, boating, wildlife interactions, snorkelling and associated wildlife behavioural change remains, particularly as visitation in general is increasing and spread further throughout the year. The popularity of the site with incoming recreational fishers and their growing numbers is the main driver of conflicts, the main impacts being the depletion of stocks. Recreational fishing is an important source of economic income, livelihoods and relaxation/sport for many local people in Exmouth (Ningaloo). Unmanaged visitor access to the property and visitor recreation activities within and adjacent to the property continue to remain major threats to the property. The karst systems are impacted by illegal cave entries and general tourism pressures including cars driving offtrack, illegal camping, extra track formations etc. (IUCN Consultation, 2024). DBCA in partnership with the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation (NTGAC) Prescribed Body Corporate (PBC) continue to implement on ground operational works to mitigate impacts from unmanaged visitor access and recreations within and adjacent the southern portion of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
The management of whale shark watching in Ningaloo is widely recognised as world-leading best practice of ecologically sustainable whale shark ecotourism. Research has found that while there are signs of disturbance when tourism vessels are present including short-term behavioural changes, there is no evidence of any long-term impacts on whale shark behaviour and visitation patterns (Jones 2021; Reynolds et al. 2024; Tyne et al. 2025). Rather, variability in environmental parameters has been found to have a far greater influence on whale shark presence. The whale shark management program (Department of Parks and Wildlife, 2013) is currently being reviewed (draft 2025) to ensure contemporary and adaptive management for the conservation of whale sharks. The whale shark management program provides best-practice interaction protocols to ensure a safe interaction that prevents the animals from harm or disturbance. DBCA also licenses commercial tour operators to ensure best-practice standards (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
The management of whale shark watching in Ningaloo is widely recognised as world-leading best practice of ecologically sustainable whale shark ecotourism. Research has found that while there are signs of disturbance when tourism vessels are present including short-term behavioural changes, there is no evidence of any long-term impacts on whale shark behaviour and visitation patterns (Jones 2021; Reynolds et al. 2024; Tyne et al. 2025). Rather, variability in environmental parameters has been found to have a far greater influence on whale shark presence. The whale shark management program (Department of Parks and Wildlife, 2013) is currently being reviewed (draft 2025) to ensure contemporary and adaptive management for the conservation of whale sharks. The whale shark management program provides best-practice interaction protocols to ensure a safe interaction that prevents the animals from harm or disturbance. DBCA also licenses commercial tour operators to ensure best-practice standards (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Conflict, Civil Unrest & Security Activities
(Military training site)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Learmonth Air Weapons Range Facility covering about 18,954 hectares within the World Heritage site is used as a defence training area. It includes an ancient reef-complex and cave fauna of exceptional importance (IUCN, 2011). The RAAF Base Learmonth is subject to a redevelopment and increase in military exercises in close proximity to the vulnerable (EPBC Act) Black-flanked rock wallaby (Petrogale lateralis), the threat to this species should be monitored to ensure there are no adverse impacts (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Fishing, Harvesting & Controlling Aquatic Species
(Recreational fishing)
Other targeted species names
Spangled Emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus), chinaman rockcod (Epinephelus rivulatus), mahi mahi (Coryphaena hippurus), giant trevally (Caranx ignobilis), Spanish Mackarel (Scomberomorus commerson).
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Recreational shore-based and boat fishing is currently one of the most popular and widespread human uses in the region (Ryan et al., 2022). The popularity of the site with incoming recreational fishers and their growing numbers is a key driver of conflicts, the main impacts being the depletion of stocks. Recreational fishing is an important source of economic income, livelihoods and relaxation/sport for many local people in Exmouth (Ningaloo) (Jones, 2021; Ryan et al. 2022), however the activity can potentially have significant ecological impacts. Studies note that recreational fishing in Ningaloo Marine Park is extensive (Davies et al., 2016; Mitchell et al., 2018) and has likely reduced the abundance of some targeted species outside of sanctuary zones (Cresswell et al., 2019) and possibly inside (Vanderklift et al., 2019). Recreational fishing effort and potential impacts on the marine environment are managed through a suite of measures including: Ningaloo Marine Park’s zoning scheme including sanctuary zones which prohibit recreational and commercial fishing; protected species; recreational catch and bag limits which are enforced by the Western Australian Government. With the exception of spearfishing, the same rules for recreational fishing apply in Ningaloo Marine Park (Commonwealth waters) (IUCN Consultation, 2017). However, data shows that the populations of key fish species in the Ningaloo Marine Park are declining, even within protected sanctuary zones, although other pressures aside from fishing are likely also playing a role in the decline (Vanderklift et al., 2019). The spangled emperor recreational fishery is subject to a number of state-wide restrictions and is provided extra protection in the marine park through 18 sanctuary zones, in which certain forms of fishing are not permitted. The loss of catch to sharks (depredation) is causing human-shark conflict in this area, which leads to increased pressure on fish populations and intentional injury/killing of sharks by fishers (Mitchell et al., 2018a, b, 2019). The Resilience Strategy for the Ningaloo Coast acknowledges the need to maintain fish abundance and diversity and the importance of promoting or establishing social norms to minimise take to provide for sustainable fishing opportunities (DBCA, 2023). The strategy notes the action as a ‘medium’ resilience priority.
Severe Weather Events
(Cyclones)
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Risk preparedness strategies for natural disasters are in place (State Party of Australia, 2010). However, there is a risk from the increasing intensity and frequency of cyclones with decreasing recovery times for corals between them (IUCN Consultation, 2017; CSIRO 2022).
The ability of the reef system to evolve and adapt to the changing environment is a major challenge when coupled with an increased risk in cyclone intensity (DBCA, 2023).
The ability of the reef system to evolve and adapt to the changing environment is a major challenge when coupled with an increased risk in cyclone intensity (DBCA, 2023).
Changes in Physical & Chemical Regimes, Changes in Temperature Regimes, Changes in Precipitation & Hydrological Regime
(Ocean acidification, temperature extremes, storms/flooding )
Inside site
, Throughout(>50%)
Outside site
Climate change poses the greatest threat to the long-term conservation of the property. While Ningaloo is one of only three (of 29) World Heritage–listed coral reefs not expected to experience bleaching at least twice per decade by 2041 (a frequency that is likely to cause total mortality) under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 climate projections (Heron et al., 2017); the same models predict that bleaching will occur at least twice per decade after 2041, a frequency that will rapidly kill most corals present and prevent successful reproduction necessary for recovery of corals and annual bleaching by 2049 (Heron et al., 2018).
Several marine heat stress events have occurred in the region over the last ~15 years, including 2010/11, 2013, 2021 and 2022. Above average sea surface temperatures in 2011 and 2013 were correlated with major bleaching and loss of corals on the eastern area of the property, and to a lesser extent in the south (Depczynski et al., 2013; Holmes et al., 2017). Notably, the Ningaloo WHA is currently undergoing its most significant heat stress event to date, with major coral bleaching observed along the length of the reef, both inside and outside of the lagoon. The extent and severity of this event is beyond any previously observed. As this event is currently underway, mortality following bleaching impacts are not yet known, but likely to be high given the significance of heat stress (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Strategies to increase resilience of ecosystems are being explored, but the risk is expected to increase (Fulton et al., 2014; Caputi et al., 2014; Lafratta et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2015; Davies et al., 2016; Jones, 2019; DBCA, 2019; NOAA, 2020). Since the risk of future bleaching events is high, strategies and ongoing investment are required to improve understanding and develop resilience (Davies et al, 2016; IUCN Consultation, 2017; Jones, 2019; DBCA, 2019).
Rising sea-levels may increase salinity in near-shore groundwater, potentially effecting subterranean habitats. CSIRO et al (2022) note the implications of climate change for the property also include increased risk of drought and increased land surface temperatures. Observed and projected impacts are notable and include: coral bleaching and flow-on effects to other key communities (e.g. invertebrates and fish) that rely on complex habitat structures that change due to repetitive bleaching, reduced coral growth rates and/or skeletal density due to ocean acidification, increased mortality in marine species, changes to connectivity with upstream supply of larvae, increased coastal erosion, change to nesting beaches for turtles – temperature changes may lead to altered sex ratios, and decline or loss of terrestrial species at the limit of their ecological tolerance (CSIRO et al 2022).
Climate change poses the biggest threat to the long-term conservation of the property (CSIRO et al, 2022). CSIRO particularly notes the unknown effects of climate change from an increased risk of drought, catastrophic fire, change in cyclone frequency, increased wave energy, change in the temperature of seawater, coral bleaching, ocean acidification, and sea level rise and its associated impacts on coastal communities and habitat (i.e. nesting habitat for turtles). The Resilience Strategy for the Ningaloo Coast was completed in 2023 (DBCA, 2023).
Several marine heat stress events have occurred in the region over the last ~15 years, including 2010/11, 2013, 2021 and 2022. Above average sea surface temperatures in 2011 and 2013 were correlated with major bleaching and loss of corals on the eastern area of the property, and to a lesser extent in the south (Depczynski et al., 2013; Holmes et al., 2017). Notably, the Ningaloo WHA is currently undergoing its most significant heat stress event to date, with major coral bleaching observed along the length of the reef, both inside and outside of the lagoon. The extent and severity of this event is beyond any previously observed. As this event is currently underway, mortality following bleaching impacts are not yet known, but likely to be high given the significance of heat stress (IUCN Consultation, 2025).
Strategies to increase resilience of ecosystems are being explored, but the risk is expected to increase (Fulton et al., 2014; Caputi et al., 2014; Lafratta et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2015; Davies et al., 2016; Jones, 2019; DBCA, 2019; NOAA, 2020). Since the risk of future bleaching events is high, strategies and ongoing investment are required to improve understanding and develop resilience (Davies et al, 2016; IUCN Consultation, 2017; Jones, 2019; DBCA, 2019).
Rising sea-levels may increase salinity in near-shore groundwater, potentially effecting subterranean habitats. CSIRO et al (2022) note the implications of climate change for the property also include increased risk of drought and increased land surface temperatures. Observed and projected impacts are notable and include: coral bleaching and flow-on effects to other key communities (e.g. invertebrates and fish) that rely on complex habitat structures that change due to repetitive bleaching, reduced coral growth rates and/or skeletal density due to ocean acidification, increased mortality in marine species, changes to connectivity with upstream supply of larvae, increased coastal erosion, change to nesting beaches for turtles – temperature changes may lead to altered sex ratios, and decline or loss of terrestrial species at the limit of their ecological tolerance (CSIRO et al 2022).
Climate change poses the biggest threat to the long-term conservation of the property (CSIRO et al, 2022). CSIRO particularly notes the unknown effects of climate change from an increased risk of drought, catastrophic fire, change in cyclone frequency, increased wave energy, change in the temperature of seawater, coral bleaching, ocean acidification, and sea level rise and its associated impacts on coastal communities and habitat (i.e. nesting habitat for turtles). The Resilience Strategy for the Ningaloo Coast was completed in 2023 (DBCA, 2023).
Any increase to on- and offshore oil and gas extraction resources operations near the site correspondingly increases the threat to the World Heritage values. Potential impacts include effects on migratory species, boat strikes with marine species, connectivity and ecological linkages within and adjacent the property, cumulative impacts including effects on migratory species, sound impacts from seismic testing, drilling, and operations combined with the impacts of minor or major oil leaks and light pollution. Most of these threats are also relevant for the proposed salt facility and port development in the vicinity of the site and the development of a new boat launch facility within the site. There is potential for groundwater resource development by the Water Corporation to secure Exmouth drinking water supply. Any increase in groundwater abstraction could potentially threaten subterranean ecosystems. The potential threat from avian influenza should be mentioned, although the potential impacts on the site's OUV are not known.
Oil & Gas exploration/development
(Further potential oil and gas exploration in the region)
Outside site
The waters surrounding the Muiron and Sunday Islands are highly prospective for hydrocarbons and exploration is anticipated to increase in this region over the next decade (Management Plan for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Muiron Islands Marine Management Area 2005-2015). The Mining Act 1978 (Mining Act) and the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act) generally take precedence over the CALM Act in respect of national parks and other terrestrial reserves, and may override the contents of management plans with regards to mining and petroleum matters. However, exploration and other activities conducted under the Mining Act and the Petroleum Act are subject to conditions intended to prevent or mitigate potential environmental impacts as described above. Drilling for petroleum exploration or production in Ningaloo Marine Park is not permitted. Seismic exploration is permissible in the Park subject to EPA assessment. There are active exploration permits operated by Lansvale Oil and Gas Pty Ltd and Victoria Petroleum Pty Ltd that overlap the Park, however only seismic exploration could be permitted in the Park. The area surrounding the Muiron and Sunday islands is prospective for petroleum and there have previously been drilling operations conducted in the area. The Muiron Islands Marine Management Area does not preclude future petroleum exploration and development in either the conservation areas or unzoned areas. Any exploration or production activities would be subject to environmental assessment. The primary role of reserve management in relation to hydrocarbon exploration will be to ensure that the reserve values are not impacted by any petroleum activities, in liaison with DoIR and the DoE/EPA (Management Plan for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Muiron Islands Marine Management Area 2005-2015).
There is potential for increased impacts and cumulative impact on OUV including effects on migratory species from seismic testing, drilling, and operations (State Party of Australia, 2023).
There is potential for increased impacts and cumulative impact on OUV including effects on migratory species from seismic testing, drilling, and operations (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Pathogens
(Avian influenza)
Inside site
, Not applicable
Outside site
The impact of the potential threat of high pathogenicity avian influenza (H5N1 strain) is unknown but could be significant based on impacts seen in other parts of the world (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Residential Areas
(Groundwater resource development)
Outside site
There is potential for groundwater resource development by the Water Corporation to secure Exmouth drinking water supply. Any increase in groundwater abstraction could potentially threaten subterranean ecosystems. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation is reviewing groundwater allocation limits across the Exmouth Peninsula. Work began on this project in November 2022 (DWER, 2024). This allocation limits review is for the Cape Range Limestone aquifer of the North West Cape, including both fresh and saline groundwater resources. The outcomes of the groundwater allocation limits review will support the department’s advice to the Minister for Environment’s Exmouth Gulf Taskforce. The Taskforce was established in July 2022 as the State Government’s key coordinating body for strategic advice on protection and integrated management options for Exmouth Gulf in partnership with the Traditional Owners. Key focus areas for the Taskforce include protecting the Gulf’s subterranean waterways and addressing knowledge gaps.
Commercial & Industrial Areas, Recreation & Tourism Areas
(Proposals for port and boat launch facility)
Inside site
, Localised(<5%)
Outside site
The Department of Transport (DoT) is leading a project to upgrade and relocate the boating facility at Tantabiddi to provide a safer access point to the tourism and recreational experiences at the Ningaloo Reef. The project aims to develop a coastal asset of regional significance providing a modern tourism hub that will enrich the experience of visitors as well as meet current and future demand from the recreational and commercial boating sectors. DoT has been engaging with the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Advisory Committee (NCWHAC) and the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation (NGTAC). Consultation will continue when the project is referred for environmental approvals and in the detailed design phase (DoT, 2025). The proposed facility is much larger and has the potential to impact the site's OUV. Another proposed development is for a port in Exmouth Gulf outside but adjacent to the WH site (Gascoyne Gateway Limited, n.d.). The port will serve a diverse range of customers, including Defence, Border Force, cruise liners, superyachts, Rare Earth and Critical Mineral projects, decommissioning of aging gas assets, large-scale renewable projects, bulk and break-bulk cargo, and regional supply-chain needs. Construction and the expected increase in ship traffic may have adverse impacts on the site's key attributes.
Mining & Quarrying
(Proposed salt facility)
Outside site
In 2016, K+S started the planning process for the construction of a production facility for solar salt in Western Australia, which could have an annual capacity of 4.7 million tonnes when completed. The project is currently in the public comment period of the approvals process. Approval from the EPA is outstanding. According to the Environmental Review Document (K+S, 2023) the Proposal is separated from the Muiron Islands Marine Management Area component of the World Heritage Area by approximately 40 km across the Exmouth Gulf marine waters. The Proposal is separated from the Ningaloo Marine Park (Commonwealth waters) component of the World Heritage Area by approximately 90 km across the Exmouth Gulf marine waters and the Exmouth land peninsular. It is considered unlikely the Proposal will have any impact on the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Area given:
• The significant distance between the Proposal and the various components of the World Heritage Area.
• Localised impacts on marine environmental quality and benthic habitat.
• Mitigation measures.
Nevertheless, the extent to the possible impacts on the WH values and attributes remains uncertain due to possible effects on water quality within marine areas that are Biologically Important Areas (BIAs) and/or critical habitat for some marine fauna species. As a result, even localised water quality impacts may contribute to significant residual impacts to Benthic Communities and Habitats (BCH) and marine fauna.
The Proposal is also predicted to result in various residual impacts that are considered significant, as reflected in the Marine Fauna and Terrestrial Fauna sections, for example leading to the loss of nearshore BCH, which may be utilised by species such as turtles, dugong, green sawfish and other elasmobranchs; the loss of important habitats for migratory shorebirds and green turtle juveniles (e.g. sandy beaches, mangroves, mudflats, algal mats).
The potential loss of marine fauna habitat is considered to be significant for several significant marine fauna species, particularly when assessed in context with other indirect Proposal impacts.
• The significant distance between the Proposal and the various components of the World Heritage Area.
• Localised impacts on marine environmental quality and benthic habitat.
• Mitigation measures.
Nevertheless, the extent to the possible impacts on the WH values and attributes remains uncertain due to possible effects on water quality within marine areas that are Biologically Important Areas (BIAs) and/or critical habitat for some marine fauna species. As a result, even localised water quality impacts may contribute to significant residual impacts to Benthic Communities and Habitats (BCH) and marine fauna.
The Proposal is also predicted to result in various residual impacts that are considered significant, as reflected in the Marine Fauna and Terrestrial Fauna sections, for example leading to the loss of nearshore BCH, which may be utilised by species such as turtles, dugong, green sawfish and other elasmobranchs; the loss of important habitats for migratory shorebirds and green turtle juveniles (e.g. sandy beaches, mangroves, mudflats, algal mats).
The potential loss of marine fauna habitat is considered to be significant for several significant marine fauna species, particularly when assessed in context with other indirect Proposal impacts.
Involvement of stakeholders and rightsholders, including indigenous peoples and local communities, in decision-making processes
There is a strong commitment to conserve the World Heritage values of the property among all stakeholders including Traditional Owners, community, scientists, local businesses, tourism operators, volunteers, Western Australian and local government agencies. An Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) was finalised between the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation (NTGAC) and the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions in 2020 which has formalised the joint vesting and ongoing joint management of the Ningaloo Marine Park and Cape Range National Park and the Nyinggulu (Ningaloo) Coastal Reserve (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Legal framework
The entire, mostly Western Australian Government-vested World Heritage site is comprehensively protected and managed, including by an overarching strategic management framework. (World Heritage Committee, 2011; Nomination, 2010; IUCN, 2011). The relevant legislation includes the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) which provides a legal framework to protect and manage nationally and internationally important heritage places, including World Heritage sites. Any new development proposal within or adjacent to the property will be subject to assessment and approval under the EPBC Act if an action is considered likely to have a significant impact on World Heritage values and other protected matters, such as threated and migratory species. At the Western Australian Government level, the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (Western Australia) provides a framework for considering potential environmental impacts of developments which may affect World Heritage values (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Following changes to governance, including the establishment of the joint management agreement and after more than 10 years of operation, it is appropriate to consider a review of the strategic management framework.
Ningaloo Marine Park and Cape Range National Parks are managed under statutory management plans (dated 2005 and 2010) and afforded the highest level of protection under the Western Australian Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 and Conservation and Land Management Regulations. All wildlife is protected under the WA Biodiversity Conservation Act and Regulations.
Ningaloo Marine Park and Cape Range National Parks are managed under statutory management plans (dated 2005 and 2010) and afforded the highest level of protection under the Western Australian Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 and Conservation and Land Management Regulations. All wildlife is protected under the WA Biodiversity Conservation Act and Regulations.
Governance arrangements
The property has an effective governance arrangement through the joint management arrangement with the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation, establishment of the Ningaloo World Heritage Advisory Committee, membership of the Australian World Heritage Advisory Committee and interagency arrangements between the Australian and West Australian governments. Additionally, the engagement of an Executive Officer to coordinate the governance arrangement is appropriate.
Integration into local, regional and national planning systems (including sea/landscape connectivity)
The Ningaloo Coast Regional Strategy (NCRS) has been an important guidance document for planning in the region since its release in 2004 and was a significant reference document in the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage nomination process. DBCA through the Resilient Reef Initiative has developed a Resilience Strategy for the Ningaloo Coast launched in 2023 which integrates climate change into local, regional planning systems. In addition DBCA commissioned an Economic Contributions Study of the direct and indirect contributions provided by the Ningaloo Coast to the local and regional Economy. A future directions paper reviewing the Ningaloo Coast Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth was released for public comment in January 2019 (Western Australian Planning Commission, 2019). However, the Ningaloo Coast Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth remains under review (DPLH, 2019). There is a need to reinforce the NCRS as the overarching strategy for guiding development proposals along the Ningaloo Coast for all planning, in support of an integrated planning approach to the property (IUCN Consultation, 2020), this need has not changed.
The statutory management plans for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Cape Range National Park are considered in local, regional and national planning systems including through Environmental Protection Act and other statutory processes.
The statutory management plans for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Cape Range National Park are considered in local, regional and national planning systems including through Environmental Protection Act and other statutory processes.
Boundaries
Boundaries are sufficient to ensure integrity of the site. Some areas originally included in the nomination were referred back to the State Party to allow further collaboration with stakeholders, including holders of private leases within these areas. The World Heritage Committee noted that these areas could be considered via a subsequent minor boundary modification (World Heritage Committee, 2011). The Committee also recommended that the State Party "Consider inclusion of the Exmouth Gulf on the grounds of ecological linkages between the Ningaloo Reef and the Gulf, in particular the extensive mangrove stands and other shallow water habitats that function as nurseries and adult foraging grounds for many species" (World Heritage Committee, 2011). The creation of conservation and recreation reserves along the Ningaloo Coast (adjacent to the World Heritage site), as well as an extension to Cape Range National Park and intertidal portions of Ningaloo Marine Park will support the integrity of the site and support the protection and conservation of the natural and cultural values within and adjacent to the site. With the finalisation of the Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) between the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation (NTGAC) Prescribed Body Corporate (PBC) and the creation of the Nyinggulu Coastal Reserves, the Western Australian Government advised IUCN in 2020 that it would consider a minor boundary modification to the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020; State Party of Australia, 2023). The consideration of a minor boundary variation, subject to the Free, Prior and Informed Consent process with the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation should be prioritised.
Overlapping international designations
N/A
Implementation of World Heritage Committee decisions and recommendations
The World Heritage Committee referred some of the areas proposed in the original nomination back to the State Party, which required further consultation with stakeholders, particularly holders of private leases, noting that they could be considered again via a subsequent minor boundary modification (World Heritage Committee, 2011). The Western Australian Government in negotiation with private leases holders along the Ningaloo Coast defined a reserve adjacent to the World Heritage property to be excised from the private lease boundaries, to ensure protection across the reserve and that it remains accessible to the public now and for future generations (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The recently formed Joint Management Body (JMB), which is chaired by Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation (NTGAC) members and contains members of DBCA, ensures the protection of cultural and natural values within and adjacent the property. An Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) between the NTGAC and the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions has formalised the joint vesting and ongoing joint management of the Ningaloo Marine Park and Cape Range National Park and the Nyinggulu (Ningaloo) Coastal Reserve (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The consideration of a minor boundary variation, subject to the Free, Prior and Informed Consent process with the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation should be prioritised.
Climate action
Climate change poses the biggest threat to the long-term conservation of the property. Strategies to increase resilience of ecosystems are being explored, but the risk is expected to increase (Fulton et al., 2014; Caputi et al., 2014; Lafratta et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2015; Davies et al., 2016; Jones, 2019; DBCA, 2019; NOAA, 2020). Since the risk of future bleaching events is high, strategies and ongoing investment are required to improve understanding and develop resilience (Davies et al, 2016; IUCN Consultation, 2017; Jones, 2019; DBCA, 2019). The Ningaloo Coast joined the Resilient Reefs Initiative to enhance existing resilience strategies and employ new innovative and coordinated approaches to build resilience in the natural environment and local communities. The Resilience Strategy for the Ningaloo Coast was completed in 2023 (DBCA, 2023) and takes a holistic view of the threats facing the reef and the community and proposes actions to support thriving, resilient ecosystems, an educated and empowered community and sustainable development and livelihoods along the Ningaloo Coast. Communities along the Ningaloo Coast actively participated in developing the Resilience Strategy through interviews, workshops, working group meetings, online surveys and social events. The DCBA has since withdrawn from the Resilient Reefs Initiative, however the Resilience Strategy and associated actions will be delivered in line with the marine and national park management plans and as resources allow. The strategy provides a framework to support existing management to support resilience in a changing climate. However, the management plans including the Management Plan for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Muiron Islands Marine Management Area (2005- 2015) are generally out-dated and inadequate to address the key threat of climate change. For example, The Management Plan for the Ningaloo Marine Park and Muiron Islands Marine Management Area (2005- 2015) was written in 2003 and 2004 before current knowledge of the threats and understanding of climate change. The plan does and cannot adequately address threats from climate change and it would be recommended that key management documents are updated in line with the efforts of the Resilient Reefs Initiative.
Management plan and overall management system
Given the various governmental levels and agencies involved and the differentiation between terrestrial and marine parts of the property, effective coordination of the multiple plans in an overall management framework is critical. The individual management plans and their respective governance arrangements are combined under the Ningaloo Coast Strategic Management Framework (IUCN, 2011; World Heritage Committee, 2011). The Director of National Parks (Australian Government) is responsible for the Ningaloo Marine Park (Commonwealth waters) and works cooperatively with the Western Australian Government. However, the marine park plan is outdated and requires review. The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) is the lead Western Australian Government agency for the management of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2017). The Shire of Exmouth and the Department of Defence jointly manage tenure within the site. The recently formalised Joint Management Body ensures the protection of cultural and natural values within and adjacent the property. DBCA is committed to building strong relationships to work in partnership with traditional owners to care for Country, through the recently created Nyinggulu (Ningaloo) Coastal Reserves and continued employment through the Aboriginal Ranger Program, clerical staff and cultural advisory staff (State Party of Australia, 2023). The Regional and Fire Management Services Division of DBCA manages marine and terrestrial parks adaptively through operational programs aligned with management plans. They assess and report on park conditions, pressures, management responses, and the implementation of these plans. For marine parks, assessments and reports are conducted annually. For terrestrial reserves, including national parks, these evaluations are done periodically according to a schedule set by DBCA and the Conservation and Parks Commission (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Law enforcement
Enforcement of relevant regulations is considered effective with staff located in both the northern and southern parts of the property. On an operational basis, PaWS and Fisheries Division officers are responsible for surveillance of activities related to recreational fishing, which is a key pressure in the property, including joint patrols, with prosecutions for fisheries offences being pursued by Fisheries Division officers and other prosecutions related to marine species and habitat disturbance being pursued by PaWS officers (Jones, 2021). There is some evidence that fishers are breaching sanctuary zone and other restrictions (bag limits, fillet export limits, etc) in the marine park and the current fixed penalty system has been considered ineffective by some in preventing further breaches (Jones, 2021).
Sustainable finance
The Australian Government currently provides a budget of AUD $140 000 per annum for five years from July 2023 for employment of a Project/Executive Officer and the conduct of the World Heritage Advisory Committee. All other finance is via Western Australian Government agencies, or non-Government organisations. According to the most recent periodic report, current funding does not cover these costs completely. World Heritage specific project funding is available through grant funding and not guaranteed. The Western Australian Government provides funding for the ongoing management of the World Heritage site, these funds are limited in relation to World Heritage specific projects but overall enhance the OUV (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Staff capacity, training and development
Currently 55 staff work in and around the site (IUCN Consultation, 2024). This does not include additional state-wide departmental staff or other key stakeholders who support and assist with the management of the site and adjacent tenure to the site that ensure the protection of the OUV (State Party of Australia, 2023). DBCA has a dedicated marine ranger and a conservation employee to southern portions of the property, based in Coral Bay. A senior operations officer has been appointed to oversee southern operations. Additionally, an operations officer and three Indigenous conservation employees, a part time clerical officer and cultural advisor have also been appointed to work across the district including southern portions of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
Education and interpretation programmes
Visitor education programmes are well developed (State Party of Australia, 2010; IUCN, 2011). Opportunities for community education and involvement are high, with significant volunteer programmes involving people in the management and monitoring of the property. DBCA implements a number of local education and interpretation programmes that inform local community members and visitors of World Heritage values, management strategies and research outcomes (IUCN Consultation, 2017). DBCA is also implementing a revised Communication Strategy (internal unpublished document) to consolidate current strategies for implementing interpretation programs and communication to the public (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Tourism and visitation management
Tourism in the area is highly focused on nature based or World Heritage values based tourism (IUCN Consultation, 2017). This is managed to a high standard by DBCA. The impacts of recreational activities other than fishing, such as whale shark and dolphin watching, are largely considered to have been effectively mitigated, but the status of some recreationally fished stocks remains a concern, particularly given past stock depletions and the trend towards increasing effort (Jones, 2021). DBCA continues to incorporate World Heritage interpretive information across the World Heritage property with a continual review of the following visitor information including Ningaloo Marine Park zoning signage, Jurabi Turtle Centre, Milyering Discovery Centre, Coral Bay Information Centre, Marine Park and National Park entry signage, visitor information – multimedia and hard copy print (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The Ningaloo Centre, run by the Shire of Exmouth, is a research, education, tourism and community hub that aims to support and develop a vibrant, welcoming community, including planning for a sustainable future.
Sustainable use
There is a need for ongoing assessment of effects of recreational fisheries to ensure management frameworks remain effective to protect the values of the site (World Heritage Committee, 2011). Research investigating the population status of important fish species in the Ningaloo Marine Park has indicated declining population trends for some species, including emperors, both inside and outside sanctuary zones (Vanderklift et al., 2019) and breaching of regulations i.e. fishing in sanctuary zones and not respecting catch limits (Jones, 2021). However, the degree to which this is attributable to fishing activities is not clear, with declines in targeted fish possibly influenced by additional factors such as large scale variation in climate (IUCN Consultation, 2020).There also seems to be an issue with a lack of a representative specifically of the recreational fishing community partaking in decision-making processes. This would be beneficial in enabling constructive engagement with the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Advisory Committee (NCWHAC) and retaining the trust and support of their sector (Jones, 2021).
Monitoring
DBCA has a marine monitoring program for key research and long-term monitoring within Ningaloo Marine Park (IUCN consultation, 2014). Strategic and targeted monitoring of sea turtles, shorebirds, coral reef communities, fish, mangroves, key invertebrates, humpback whales, whale sharks and water temperature is coordinated by DBCA to strategically support and inform on-reserve management actions. In addition, understanding of the marine values of Ningaloo is supported by a large number of external research organisations including AIMS, the CSIRO and numerous Australian Universities (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Monitoring and mapping the colonies of Black-flanked rock wallabies (Petrogale lateralis) has also been occurring throughout the area over the past eight years, with a number of new colonies identified and existing strongholds monitored. Community participation is encouraged to develop stewardship for these World Heritage values (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Overall, some monitoring programmes in place have been strategically designed and implemented at relevant spatial and temporal scales to inform and support operational management and conservation. Other monitoring programmes, however, continue at spatial and temporal scales not useful for supporting management of OUV and the integrity of the site (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Research
A long list of research projects is provided in the nomination (2010). Research activities continue in and around the property, including applied research projects in terrestrial and marine environments conducted by DBCA (IUCN Consultation, 2020) and the Western Australian Marine Science Institute.
The Minderoo Exmouth Research Lab (MERL) enables marine science on the World Heritage property and adjacent Exmouth Gulf. MERL supports researchers through its facility which support the environmental control required to simulate typical conditions associated with climate change (including temperature variance through the aquaria system) and through molecular testing equipment. Through an Expression of Interest program, MERL is supporting a range of research including identifying heat-resilient corals, using environmental DNA to understand the distribution of critically endangered species such as sawfish, wedgefish and sea snakes, and understanding the behavioural patterns of several iconic megafauna species. Overall although research is adequate, it could be better targeted towards researching attributes to improve overall understanding of the OUV in its entirety and better informing management (State Party of Australia, 2023).
The Minderoo Exmouth Research Lab (MERL) enables marine science on the World Heritage property and adjacent Exmouth Gulf. MERL supports researchers through its facility which support the environmental control required to simulate typical conditions associated with climate change (including temperature variance through the aquaria system) and through molecular testing equipment. Through an Expression of Interest program, MERL is supporting a range of research including identifying heat-resilient corals, using environmental DNA to understand the distribution of critically endangered species such as sawfish, wedgefish and sea snakes, and understanding the behavioural patterns of several iconic megafauna species. Overall although research is adequate, it could be better targeted towards researching attributes to improve overall understanding of the OUV in its entirety and better informing management (State Party of Australia, 2023).
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats outside the site
Due to its remoteness and the appropriateness of its boundaries, the site is not subject to significant threats originating from outside its boundaries, with the exception of climate change and possible oil spills or boat strikes on marine fauna. To this end, the management authority has recognized the need to identify and protect potential climate change refugia; limit the impact of other key threatening processes; incorporate climate change science into strategies; and facilitate adaptation (DBCA, 2019) – although some research has indicated that adaptation may be insufficient in Western Australian waters (Moore et al., 2012). It is also recognized that it will be important to build resilience through minimizing other impacts, such as by increasing the number of 'no-take areas (marine reserves), and better representation of reserves to encompass areas (potential refugia) most resilient to climate change (Davies et al, 2016); and by reducing the impacts of seagrass and coral damage and overfishing (Jones, 2019). The Ningaloo Coast joined the Resilient Reefs Initiative to enhance existing resilience strategies and employ new innovative and coordinated approaches to build resilience in the natural environment and local communities. The Resilience Strategy for the Ningaloo Coast was completed in 2023 (DBCA, 2023). However, since then the DCBA has withdrawn from the initative and there is uncertainty regarding means to implement the necessary actions for effective climate mitigation and adaptation. It is noted that the management authority is very good at mitigating conflicts such as those related to marine wildlife tourism (Jones, 2019), however in regard to recreational fishing, efforts could be strengthened (Jones, 2021). Other threats from outside the site include oil and gas extraction (Cresswell et al., 2020) are regulated and closely managed currently and emergency preparation for accidental spills is in place. Although the Ningaloo Coast had joined the Resilient Reefs Initiative to enhance existing resilience strategies and employ new innovative and coordinated approaches to build resilience in the natural environment and local communities, there is a need to update management documents to align with this endeavour along with alignment of the Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth, which remains under review and needs to be reinforced as the overarching strategy for guiding development proposals along the Ningaloo Coast for all planning, in support of an integrated planning approach to the property.
Effectiveness of management system and governance in addressing threats inside the site
Due to its remoteness and the size of the property the site is not subject to significant internal threats. The intergovernmental co-ordination across the property, which is coordinated by the Executive Officer is a significant contributor to the overall management effectiveness of the site. The most present day-to-day management threats, tourism and recreation pressures are appropriately governed, although management of recreational fishing pressure could be strengthened. The threat of climate change is actively managed within the property’s management system, however, property level management is not able to address the overall, given the global context.
A need for ongoing management of fisheries and visitation and careful planning of resource extraction with corresponding monitoring and disaster preparedness to protect the values of the site has been recognised at the time of its inscription (World Heritage Committee, 2011; IUCN, 2011). Currently, the Ningaloo Coast has comprehensive management plans, operational frameworks and staff in place to guide management and address these issues (DBCA, 2019), however plans could be more regularly updated and the marine park plan is now outdated. The Regional and Fire Management Services Division of DBCA manages marine and terrestrial parks adaptively through operational programs aligned with management plans. They assess and report on park conditions, pressures, management responses, and the implementation of these plans. For marine parks, assessments and reports are conducted annually. For terrestrial reserves, including national parks, these evaluations are done periodically according to a schedule set by DBCA and the Conservation and Parks Commission. DBCA’s Biodiversity and Conservation Science’s Marine Science Program undertakes marine ecological monitoring which is undertaken collaboratively with joint management bodies. The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development reports on fish, fishing activities, and related strategies within marine park management plans.
A need for ongoing management of fisheries and visitation and careful planning of resource extraction with corresponding monitoring and disaster preparedness to protect the values of the site has been recognised at the time of its inscription (World Heritage Committee, 2011; IUCN, 2011). Currently, the Ningaloo Coast has comprehensive management plans, operational frameworks and staff in place to guide management and address these issues (DBCA, 2019), however plans could be more regularly updated and the marine park plan is now outdated. The Regional and Fire Management Services Division of DBCA manages marine and terrestrial parks adaptively through operational programs aligned with management plans. They assess and report on park conditions, pressures, management responses, and the implementation of these plans. For marine parks, assessments and reports are conducted annually. For terrestrial reserves, including national parks, these evaluations are done periodically according to a schedule set by DBCA and the Conservation and Parks Commission. DBCA’s Biodiversity and Conservation Science’s Marine Science Program undertakes marine ecological monitoring which is undertaken collaboratively with joint management bodies. The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development reports on fish, fishing activities, and related strategies within marine park management plans.
The Ningaloo Coast has a range of management plans and qualified staff who are supported by a strong governance arrangement. Programmes ensuring management and control of invasive species, emergency preparedness in the case of an accidental oil spill and management strategies to mitigate pressures from increasing visitation are in place to ensure the protection and conservation of natural values. At the time of inscription some concerns were expressed with the regards to the adequacy of staff numbers and available funding compared to the scale of management activities. An increase in overall management resources has been implemented by the Western Australian Government through the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA). DBCA now has a total of 55 staff (equivalent full-time positions) including specialist staff to manage the natural values of the property and adjunct land tenure. Management is strengthened through formal joint management arrangements with the NTGAC. An Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) formalised the joint management of the Ningaloo Marine Park and Cape Range National Park and the Nyinggulu (Ningaloo) Coastal Reserve by DBCA and the Traditional Owners. The joint management arrangement supports the integrity of the World Heritage site and conservation of the natural and cultural values within and adjacent to it. Communication between DBCA and the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, and other State and Australian government agencies (Parks Australia) and research organisations (CSIRO, AIMS, UWA and other universities) is important for shared knowledge to inform management. Furthermore, the relations with recreational fishers could be strengthened and current regulations better enforced to manage the increasing fishing pressure more effectively. Due to the significant threat posed by climate change, strategies and ongoing investment are required to improve understanding and develop resilience. Although the Ningaloo Coast joined the Resilient Reefs Initiative, the DCBA has since withdrawn from the Initiative which raises uncertainty as to how strategies will be delivered to mitigate and adapt to climate change. Furthermore, there is a need to update management documents to align with this endeavour along with alignment of the Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth, which remains under review and needs to be reinforced as the overarching strategy for guiding development proposals along the Ningaloo Coast for all planning, in support of an integrated planning approach to the property.
Good practice examples
The property hosts one of the largest reliable whale shark aggregations in the world. DBCA manages a licensed commercial tourism activity for whale shark and humpback whale interactions within the property (Ningaloo Marine Park (State waters). The management of the whale shark and humpback whale commercial tourism industry based around this exceptional phenomenon, is acknowledged globally as best practise and considered a successful model for sustainable natured-based tourism, inspiring other countries to establish similar conservation management programs to protect their aggregations (Norman, 2002; Rowat & Brooks, 2012; Sanzogni et al., 2015).
Exceptional landscape combining arid terrestrial and marine features
Good
Trend
Stable
Overall the values of the property remain in good condition (IUCN Consultation, 2017). The outstanding aesthetic attributes of the property remain well preserved and the property continues to feature an exceptional combination of unique marine, coastal and terrestrial environments of striking contrast.
One of the largest documented aggregation of whale sharks in the world
Low Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
Ningaloo Coast supports rare and large aggregations of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus), with approximately 300-500 whale sharks reported at the time of inscription (World Heritage Committee, 2011; IUCN, 2011).
DBCA has implemented a number of measures to manage encounters between operators, tourists and whale sharks, thereby mitigating potential impacts on the animals (Sanzogni et al., 2015).
Intentional and unintentional mortality outside Australian waters is the most significant threat to the whale sharks. In Australia, boat strikes from large vessels and habitat disruption constitute the most significant threats, these are mitigated through the comprehensive management program (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
DBCA has implemented a number of measures to manage encounters between operators, tourists and whale sharks, thereby mitigating potential impacts on the animals (Sanzogni et al., 2015).
Intentional and unintentional mortality outside Australian waters is the most significant threat to the whale sharks. In Australia, boat strikes from large vessels and habitat disruption constitute the most significant threats, these are mitigated through the comprehensive management program (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
High diversity of marine fish
High Concern
Trend
Deteriorating
With increases in recreational fishing and declining coral conditions, there are concerns over short term impacts on populations of some species and longer-term impacts on the broader ecosystem (Cresswell et al., 2020). Specifically, research has identified declines in target and non-target fish species, not only in fished areas but also in Ningaloo Marine Park sanctuary zones. Determining the direct cause is difficult due to a combination of fishing and environmental/habitat related factors (Vanderklift et al., 2019; Jones, 2021). Any impacts to the coral, especially as a result of climate change (coral bleaching) will also likely have strong flow-on effects to the fish and declines in various groups have been noted in some areas.
High diversity of reptiles
Low Concern
Trend
Stable
These values have remained well preserved since the inscription of the property (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Sea turtles have been well-studied along the Ningaloo Coast since 2002. Numbers of nesting females vary greatly among years, but no long-term trends of decline have been identified (IUCN Consultation, 2020). The long-term survival of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) at Ningaloo appears to be under threat from predation by ghost crabs (Avenant et al. 2023), seagulls and climate change. The current condition of marine turtles, while estimated from numbers of adult female turtles, is not known for turtle hatchlings. It appears that at least in some locations, loggerhead turtle hatchlings are not surviving in adequate numbers for the population to be sustainable (Avenant et al. 2023). Although no specific surveys have been done within the World Heritage site, terrestrial reptiles are believed to be in good condition with the recent successes with feral animal control programs (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Climate change is a significant future threat. DBCA advises that new research and data regarding terrestrial reptiles at Ningaloo has been undertaken and will be provided to IUCN when available (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
High diversity of marine mammals
Good
Trend
Data Deficient
A study on humpback whales distribution and abundance recorded a total of 2772 humpback whales in Exmouth Gulf between 08 August and 02 November 2018. The study also confirmed that Exmouth Gulf is an important resting area for the Breeding Stock D humpback whales (Irvine and Kent, 2018). The same study recorded a total of 605 dugongs and 556 dolphins.
High diversity of subterranean fauna
High Concern
Trend
Data Deficient
The blind cave eel (Ophisternon candidum), found in the subterranean waters of the Cape Range Peninsula is listed as "vulnerable" under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (Western Australia) and the EPBC Act as well as being assessed as "endangered" by the IUCN Red List (Moore, 2019). Some studies conclude that subterranean species globally are particularly sensitive to climate change (Mammola et al., 2019). However, no comprehensive data has been found to determine current trends specifically for Ningaloo Coast. DBCA advises that new research and data regarding subterranean fauna at Ningaloo has been undertaken and will be provided to IUCN when available (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Noteworthy arid-zone vascular flora
Low Concern
Trend
Stable
Coastal vegetation communities suffer impacts of increased visitation, unmanaged visitor access and recreation, combined with weeds, are the main ongoing pressures (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
High diversity of marine invertebrates and algae
Critical
Trend
Deteriorating
The Ningaloo Coast coral reef ecosystems are considered as being likely to be very vulnerable to climate change (Fulton et al., 2014), and coral bleaching (and flow-on impacts on marine species) has been recorded at the site in the past, particularly associated with a severe ocean heat-wave event that impacted the site in 2010/11, 2013, and 2021/22. Notably, the Ningaloo WHA is currently undergoing its most significant heat stress event to date, with major coral bleaching observed along the length of the reef, both inside and outside of the lagoon. The extent and severity of this event is beyond any previously observed. As this event is currently underway, mortality following bleaching impacts are not yet known, but likely to be high given the significance of heat stress. The risk of future bleaching events remains high (Fulton et al., 2014; Caputi et al., 2014; Lafratta et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2015; Davies et al., 2016; Jones, 2019; DBCA, 2019; NOAA, 2020; CSIRO et al, 2022). CSIRO particularly notes the unknown effects of climate change from an increased risk of change in cyclone frequency, increased wave energy, change in the temperature of seawater, coral bleaching, ocean acidification, and sea level rise and its associated impacts on coastal communities and habitat (i.e. nesting habitat for turtles). UNESCO has predicted Ningaloo will cease to host functioning coral reef ecosystems by 2041 under a business-as-usual scenario of global carbon emissions (Heron et al., 2017). Under this scenario, Ningaloo Reef is predicted to have twice decadal bleaching by 2041. The risk to the health of coral reef communities and species that depend on them is extreme. In March 2022, the annual coral spawning event coincided with elevated seawater temperature, calm weather conditions, and a flood tide resulting in coral spawn becoming trapped in a localised section of the Ningaloo coastline (Bills Bay, Ningaloo Reef). Immediately after, there was a mass fish kill, which is believed to have been caused by local eutrophication resulting in severe oxygen depletion. This resulted in >90% coral mortality in inner parts of the bay (Richards et al., 2024). While similar events have occurred periodically over the past 30 years, this is considered one of the most significant recorded to date.
Assessment of the current state and trend of World Heritage values
Deteriorating
Tourism, grazing and feral species are impacting some terrestrial and marine values of the site, however, these impacts remain small in scale and localised. Visitation continues to increase and Ningaloo is a destination of choice for state, national and international visitors with over 39,300 visitors swimming with whale sharks on commercial tours in 2024. The concerns are greater for the Ningaloo Coast site's marine areas, with climate change impacts, oil and gas and further industrial development in particular registering as a significant threats. The Ningaloo Coast coral reef ecosystems are very vulnerable to climate change, and coral bleaching (and flow-on impacts on marine species) has been recorded at the site in the past, particularly associated with a severe ocean heat-wave event that impacted the site in 2011. Four marine heat stress events within the Ningaloo Marine Park have occurred over recent time being in 2010/11, 2013, 2021 and 2022. Notably, the Ningaloo WHA is currently undergoing its most significant heat stress event to date, with major coral bleaching observed along the length of the reef, both inside and outside of the lagoon. The extent and severity of this event is beyond any previously observed. As this event is currently underway, mortality following bleaching impacts are not yet known, but likely to be high given the significance of heat stress. Concerns are high regarding their future as the risk of future bleaching events remains high. UNESCO has predicted Ningaloo Reef will cease to host functioning coral reef ecosystems by 2041 under a business-as-usual scenario of global carbon emissions. Under this scenario, Ningaloo Reef is predicted to have twice decadal bleaching by 2041. The risk to the health of coral reef communities and species that depend on them is extreme. Some concerns exist with regards to the aggregations of whale sharks as this species is under pressure from different threats, especially in areas outside Australian waters. With increases in recreational fishing, there are also concerns over short term impacts on populations of some species and longer term impacts on the broader ecosystem. Recent research has identified declines in target and non-target fish species, not only in fished areas but also in Ningaloo Marine Park sanctuary zones.
Assessment of the current state and trend of other important biodiversity values
Good
Data Deficient
Although birds were not considered as contributing to the Outstanding Universal Value of the site under criterion x, they were assessed as noteworthy in the evaluation and merit monitoring in future. No comprehensive data is available to determine current trends. Significant numbers of internationally recognised shorebirds (RAMSAR), including critically endangered species such as the eastern curlew, bar tailed godwit, curlew sandpiper and great knot have been recorded within Exmouth Gulf (BirdLife Western Australia, 2020). There is new research and data regarding birds at Ningaloo which needs to be confirmed and will be provided to IUCN when available (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
Additional information
Outdoor recreation and tourism
Beneficiaries include local and regional businesses that rely on tourism, and the tourists themselves.
The diversity of landscapes and ecosystems in the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage site offers many opportunities for recreation and tourism. As such, this region is one of the premier tourist destinations in the whole of Western Australia. However, the threats outlined in this assessment could cause substantial damage to these areas of outstanding natural beauty and biodiversity, negatively impacting the tourism sector, particularly marine tour businesses.
Fishing areas and conservation of fish stocks
Areas of seagrass, algae and mangroves provide a nursery site for fish within and outside the protected area. Well-established sanctuary zones can have a positive effect on maintaining populations of fished species by protecting key habitats such as coral reefs, seagrass, algal habitats and mangroves. Commercial fishing from Ningaloo is estimated to contribute $12.2 million economic expenditure, $8.3 million value added 41 value added FTE employment (Deloitte, 2020).
Climate change and loss of habitat could have negative effects on key fish habitats, specifically coral reefs, seagrass, algal communities and mangroves.
Access to drinking water,
Commercial wells
The water supply for Exmouth is obtained from extraction from an aquifer underneath the World Heritage site. Uses are bottling and municipal drinking water supply.
Uses are bottling and municipal drinking water supply.
Sacred natural sites or landscapes
There are Aboriginal burial grounds and mythological and numerous midden sites in the site which are considered sacred. Cultural sites have recently been identified through a series of heritage surveys within and adjacent to the World Heritage site (IUCN Consultation, 2020). Ningaloo has significant value for the local Aboriginal people, the Baiyungu, Thalanyji and Yinikurtura people. Prior to European Settlement, the Traditional Owners lived in a coastal – resource driven economy, relying on Ningaloo to service fundamental needs including food, shelter and material resources. The Ningaloo region provides the foundation for cultural heritage dating back at least 32,000 years, including ceremonial Thalu sites. The value of Aboriginal connection to country is important to the Traditional owners’ spirituality and religion, with local fauna representative of family totems. Ningaloo also has intrinsic non-use value to those who have not, or may not ever, visit; for generations to come (bequest value); and in knowing that other people have access to the benefits of theReef and the surrounding region (altruistic value). People value its existence, simply because the natural asset – worthy of World Heritage status – exists (existence value) (Deloitte, 2020).
The joint management arrangement with the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation is likely to enhance management of these values.
Sustainable extraction of materials (e.g. coral, shells, resin, rubber, grass, rattan, etc)
Coral and specimen shell collecting is not allowed in the Ningaloo Marine Park unless the collector has been issued with an appropriate licence.
Importance for research,
Contribution to education
Important area for research, both marine and terrestrial, as well as archaeological studies. Opportunities for community education and involvement are high, with significant volunteer programmes operating involving people in the management and monitoring of the site. There are significant local education and interpretation programmes that inform local community members and visitors of World Heritage values, management strategies and research outcomes (IUCN Consultation, 2017). Programs are supported by a range of organisations including the West Australian Government, Exmouth Shire through the Ningaloo Centre and Minderoo through the Exmouth Research Lab.
Soil stabilisation,
Coastal protection,
Flood prevention,
Water provision (importance for water quantity and quality)
Large natural terrestrial and marine areas provide important environmental services including coastal protection, soil stabilisation, wetland protection, and groundwater renewal.
Maintaining this suit of environmental services is important in the context of increase risks resulting from predicted climate change events.
Provision of jobs,
Tourism-related income
Provision of revenue and employment through tourism and park management. Beneficiaries include local and regional businesses that rely on tourism, and the tourists themselves. Tourism in the area is highly focused on nature based or World Heritage values based tourism. Industries revolve around camping, diving and interacting with the marine megafauna within the World Heritage site. In 2018-19, Ningaloo contributed an estimated $110 million in value added to the WA economy. More than 90% of this value added is attributed to the hundreds of thousands of domestic and international tourists who visit Ningaloo each year, with this tourism activity largely contingent on the Reef’s unique existence. Ningaloo is estimated to have supported more than 1,000 full time jobs in WA in 2018-19, with employment concentrated in tourism-related industries catering to visitation to the region (Deloitte, 2020).
With tourism numbers increasing it will remain important to care, control and manage intensively visited sites across a vast property.
The site benefits the local and global community by protecting wildlife and wilderness values, providing environmental services and allowing people to experience the special values of the site. The mangrove areas and no-take sanctuary zones provide a nursery for fisheries outside of the World Heritage site, and tourism provides important benefits to tourists as well as revenue and jobs to the local population. Park management also provides jobs, and research undertaken in the World Heritage site increases scientific knowledge and education. Management of the site provides benefits to the local Aboriginal community, through generation of jobs and cultural connections to country. Maintaining these benefits will be directly influenced by the predictions for the site from climate change.
| № | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions | Integrated feral animal control programs, weed control programs and monitoring of threatened species and communities. | |
| 2 | Cape Conservation Group Ltd Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions | North West Cape Feral Animal Trapping Program. | |
| 3 | Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Cape Conservation Group Ltd | Ningaloo Turtle Program (community based monitoring program). |
http://www.ningalooturtles.org.au/
|
| 4 | Fin Focus | A Citizen Science research project collecting shark and ray sightings in the Exmouth/Ningaloo Region |
https://www.facebook.com/finfocusresearch
|
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
Avenant, Casper Scott Whiting, Sabrina Fossette, Peter Barnes, Glenn A. Hyndes (2023) Extreme predation of eggs and hatchlings for loggerhead turtles in eastern Indian Ocean. Biodiversity and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02739-z
|
| 2 |
Bateman, Rebecca & Morgan, David & Wueringer, Barbara & McDavitt, Matthew & Lear, Karissa. (2024). Collaborative methods identify a remote global diversity hotspot of threatened, large‐bodied rhino rays. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 34. 10.1002/aqc.4047.
|
| 3 |
BirdLife Western Australia. (2020). Eastern Cape Range Peninsula. [online] Floreat WA: BirdLife WA. Available at: https://www.birdlife.org.au/images/uploads/branches/documen… [Accessed 27 November 2020].
|
| 4 |
CSIRO, Managers of World Heritage Properties in Australia, and Indigenous Reference Group. (2022) The implications of climate change for World Heritage properties in Australia: assessment of impacts and vulnerabilities. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Canberra. CC BY 4.0. Available at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/imp…
|
| 5 |
Caputi, N., Jackson, G. & Pearce, A. (2014). The marine heat wave off Western Australia during the summer of 2010/11 – 2 years on. Fisheries Research Report No. 250. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 40pp.
|
| 6 |
Cresswell AK, Langlois TJ, Wilson SK, Claudet J, Thomson DP, Renton M, Fulton CJ, Fisher R, Vanderklift MA, Babcock RC, Stuart-Smith RD, Haywood MDE, Depczynski M, Westera M, Ayling AM, Fitzpatrick B, Halford AR, McLean DL, Pillans RD, Cheal AJ, Tinkler P, Edgar GJ, Graham NAJ, Harvey ES, and Holmes TH. (2019b). Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network. Biological Conservation 237:514-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023
|
| 7 |
DBCA (2023). Fire Management Strategy. Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Parks and Wildlife Service. Available at: https://www.dbca.wa.gov.au/management/fire
|
| 8 |
DBCA (Western Australian Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions). (2023) Resilience Strategy for the Ningaloo Coast. Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions. Available at: https://www.dbca.wa.gov.au/management/world-heritage-areas/…
|
| 9 |
DCBA (2025). Burn Options Program. Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Parks and Wildlife Service. Available at: https://www.dbca.wa.gov.au/management/fire/prescribed-burni…
|
| 10 |
DWER (2024). Exmouth groundwater allocation limits review - Project update November 2024. Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, Government of Western Australia. Available at: https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2024-11/exmouth-project-…
|
| 11 |
Davies, H.N., Beckley, L.E., Kobryn, H.T., Lombard, A.T., Radford, B., & Heyward, A. (2016). Integrating Climate Change Resilience Features into the Incremental Refinement of an Existing Marine Park. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0161094. doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0161094 |
| 12 |
Deloitte (2020). Economic contribution of Ningaloo: one of Australia's best kept secrets. Deloitte Access Economics Pty Ltd, Perth, Australia. Available at: https://www.barrierreef.org/uploads/Economic-contribution-o…
|
| 13 |
Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (2019). Annual Report. https://www.dbca.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-09/DBCA…
|
| 14 |
Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (2024) ‘Ningaloo Turtle Program Annual Report 2023-2024’. Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions and the Ningaloo Turtle Program, Exmouth, Western Australia.
|
| 15 |
Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. (2019). Nyinggulu (Ningaloo) Coastal Reserves: Red Bluff to Winderabandi draft joint management plan. Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Perth. (Accessed 29 April 2020). Retrieved from https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/images/documents/conservation-ma…
|
| 16 |
Department of Parks and Wildlife (2013). Whale shark management with particular reference to Ningaloo Marine Park. Wildlife management program no. 57. Department of Parks and Wildlife. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&…
|
| 17 |
Depczynski, M., Gilmour, J. P., Ridgway, T., Barnes, H., Heyward, A. J., Holmes, T. H., ... & Wilson, S. K. (2013). Bleaching, coral mortality and subsequent survivorship on a West Australian fringing reef. Coral reefs, 32(1), 233–238.
|
| 18 |
DoT (2024). Tantabiddi Boating Facility. Government of Western Australia, Department of Transport. Available at: https://transport.wa.gov.au/imarine/tantabiddi-boating-faci…
|
| 19 |
Feng, M., Hendon, H. H., Xie, S.-P., Marshall, A. G., Schiller, A., Kosaka, Y., Caputi, N., & Pearce, A. (2015). Decadal increase in Ningaloo Niño since the late 1990s, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 104–112. doi:10.1002/2014GL062509.
|
| 20 |
Fulton, C. J., Depczynski, M., Holmes, T. H., Noble, M. M., Radford, B., Wernberg, T., & Wilson, S. K. (2014). Sea temperature shapes seasonal fluctuations in seaweed biomass within the Ningaloo coral reef ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography, 59(1), 156-166.
|
| 21 |
Gascoyne Gateway Limited (n.d.). Gascoyne Gateway Marine Complex (GGMC). 2024 Gascoyne Gateway Limited. Available at: https://gascoynegateway.com.au/
|
| 22 |
Heron et al. (2017). Impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage Coral Reefs : A First Global Scientific Assessment. Paris, UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
|
| 23 |
Holmes, T., Rule, M., Bancroft, K., Shedrawi, G., Murray, K., Wilson, S. & Kendrick, A. (2017). Ecological Monitoring in the Ningaloo Marine Reserves 2017. Perth: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.
|
| 24 |
IUCN (2011). World Heritage Nomination– IUCN Technical Evaluation. Ningaloo Coast (Australia). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2011, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. [online] Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1369/documents/ [Accessed 15 January 2017]
|
| 25 |
Irvine, L. and Salgado Kent, C. (2019). The distribution and relative abundance of marine mega-fauna, with a focus on humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae), in Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia, 2018. Available online at: <https://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Schemes/Attac…; [Accessed 24 July 2020].
|
| 26 |
Jones, P. J. (2019). A governance analysis of Ningaloo and Shark Bay Marine Parks, Western Australia: putting the ‘eco’ in tourism to build resilience but threatened in long-term by climate change?. Marine Policy, 103636.
|
| 27 |
Jones, P. J. (2021). A governance analysis of Ningaloo and Shark Bay Marine Parks, Western Australia: putting the ‘eco’in tourism to build resilience but threatened in long-term by climate change?. Marine Policy, 127, 103636.
|
| 28 |
K+S (2023). Ashburton Salt Project: Environmental Review Document. K plus S Salt Australia Pty Ltd (K+S). 30 May 2023. Available at: https://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/PER_documenta…
|
| 29 |
Lafratta, A., Fromont, J., Speare, P., & Schönberg, C. H. L. (2015). Coral bleaching in turbid waters of north-western Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 68(1), 65-75.
|
| 30 |
Mammola, S., et al. (2019). Scientists’ Warning on the Conservation of Subterranean Ecosystems.Bioscience69(8): 641-650.
|
| 31 |
Mitchell, J.D., McLean, D.L., Collin, S.P. and Langlois, T.J. (2018b). Shark depredation in commercial and recreational fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 28(4), 715-748.
|
| 32 |
Mitchell, J.D., McLean, D.L., Collin, S.P. and Langlois, T.J. (2019). Shark depredation and behavioural interactions with fishing gear in a recreational fishery in Western Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 616, 107-122.
|
| 33 |
Mitchell, J.D., McLean, D.L., Collin, S.P., Taylor, S., Jackson, G., Fisher, R. and Langlois, T.J., (2018a). Quantifying shark depredation in a recreational fishery in the Ningaloo Marine Park and Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 587, 141-157.
|
| 34 |
Moore, G. (2019). Ophisternon candidum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T15386A123378485. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T15386A12337… on 24 July 2020.
|
| 35 |
Moore, J. A., Bellchambers, L. M., Depczynski, M. R., Evans, R. D., Evans, S. N., Field, S. N., ... & Radford, B. T. (2012). Unprecedented mass bleaching and loss of coral across 12 of latitude in Western Australia in 2010–11. PloS one, 7(12).
|
| 36 |
NOAA. (2020). Coral Reef Watch- Ningaloo. [online] Washington D.C., USA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available at: https://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/product/vs/gauges/ningaloo… [Accessed 26 November 2020].
|
| 37 |
National Native Title Tribunal. Indigenous Land Use Agreement between the Nganhurra Thanardi Garrbu Aboriginal Corporation Prescribed Body Corporate and the Western Australian Government Available at: https://www.nntt.gov.au/searchRegApps/NativeTitleRegisters/…
|
| 38 |
Norman B. (2002). Review of Current and Historical Research on the Ecology of Whale Sharks (Rhincodon typus), and Applications to Conservation through Management of Species. Fremantle: Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management.
|
| 39 |
Norman, B. M., & Morgan, D. L. (2016). The Return of 'Stumpy' the Whale Shark: Two Decades and Counting. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 14(8).
|
| 40 |
Pitman, Robert., Totterdell, John., Fearnbach, Holly., Ballance, Lisa., Durban, John., Kemps, Hans. (2014). Whale Killers: Prevalence and Ecological Implications of Killer Whale Predation on Humpback Whale Calves off Western Australia. Marine Mammal Science. 31. 10.1111/mms.12182.
|
| 41 |
Reynolds, S. D., Redcliffe, J., Norman, B. M., Wilson, R. P., Holton, M., Franklin, C. E., & Dwyer, R. G. (2024). Swimming with humans: biotelemetry reveals effects of “gold standard” regulated tourism on whale sharks. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(1), 85-104.
|
| 42 |
Rowat, D.& Brooks, K.S. (2012). A review of the biology, fisheries and conservation of the whale shark Rhincodon typus. Journal of Fish Biology 80, 1019-1056.
|
| 43 |
Ryan, K. L., Smallwood, C. B., & Lai, E. K. (2022). Boat-based recreational fishing in Western Australia 2020/21. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development.
|
| 44 |
Sanzogni RL, Meekan MG, Meeuwig JJ (2015) Multi-Year Impacts of Ecotourism on Whale Shark (Rhincodon typus) Visitation at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0127345.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127345
|
| 45 |
Sanzogni, R. L., Meekan, M. G., & Meeuwig, J. J. (2015). Multi-year impacts of ecotourism on whale shark (Rhincodon typus) visitation at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia. PloS one, 10(9), e0127345.
|
| 46 |
State Party of Australia (2023). Periodic Reporting Cycle 3, Section II: Ningaloo Coast. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1369/documents/
|
| 47 |
State Party of Australia (Nomination) (2010). Nomination of Ningaloo Coast as a World Heritage Site. Canberra, Australia: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Australia.
|
| 48 |
Tyne, J. A., Raudino, H. C., Lester, E., Francis, G., Barnes, P., & Waples, K. (2025). Ningaloo Marine Park Management Program best practice for whale shark (Rhincodon typus) conservation. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 5, 1499005.
|
| 49 |
Vanderklift, M.A., Babcock, R.C., Boschetti, F., Haywood, M.D., Pillans, R.D. and Thomson, D.P. (2019). Declining abundance of coral reef fish in a World-Heritage-listed marine park. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-8.
|
| 50 |
Western Australian Planning Commission. (2019). Future Direction for the Ningaloo Coast Regional Strategy Carnarvon to Exmouth. Western Australian Planning Commission. Available at: https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2021-07/GASC_Future-dire…
|
| 51 |
World Heritage Committee. (SoOUV) (2011). Decision: 35COM 8B.7 Ningaloo Coast Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (Australia). In: Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th Session. [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1369/documents/[Accessed 8 April 2015].
|