Namib Sand Sea
Namib Sand Sea is the only coastal desert in the world that includes extensive dune fields influenced by fog. Covering an area of over three million hectares and a buffer zone of 899,500 hectares, the site is composed of two dune systems, an ancient semi-consolidated one overlain by a younger active one. The desert dunes are formed by the transportation of materials thousands of kilometres from the hinterland, that are carried by river, ocean current and wind. It features gravel plains, coastal flats, rocky hills, inselbergs within the sand sea, a coastal lagoon and ephemeral rivers, resulting in a landscape of exceptional beauty. Fog is the primary source of water in the site, accounting for a unique environment in which endemic invertebrates, reptiles and mammals adapt to an ever-changing variety of microhabitats and ecological niches.
© UNESCO
Summary
2025 Conservation Outlook
Current state and trend of VALUES
Overall THREATS
Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT
Full assessment
Description of values
World’s only coastal desert with extensive dune fields influenced by fog
Massive dunes made of sand transported from afar
Diversity of dune formations and natural beauty
Plant and animal adaptations to desert conditions
Rare and endemic species
Assessment information
The prolonged drought in Namibia has killed off most alien plant species and associated seedbanks previously recorded within and outside the property (IUCN Consultation, 2024; Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021). Efforts were made to completely eradicate alien plant species during their period of dormancy, before seed dispersal. In 2022, funding from UNESCO was acquired to employ semi-skilled workers under Cash for Work programme from September to December 2022 to eradicate alien plant species (IUCN Consultation, 2024). Threat of alien plant species is concentrated along the Tsauchab river which is inside the site and Kuiseb river bordering the property, mainly in the buffer zone. Park staff are continuing to uproot and burn alien plant species (IUCN Consulation, 2024). Species prioritised for removal are: Datura inoxia, D. stramonium, D. ferox, Argemone ochroleuca, Ricinus communis, Nicotiana glauca, Prosopis spp. (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021).
Alien plants are difficult to eliminate due to regular re-infestation during each flooding cycle, while feral animals are difficult to remove because of the sporadic refill. The Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism has developed a programme which monitors and opportunistically eradicate undesirable and feral population of alien species (Ministry of Environment and Tourism, 2013a). Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (MEFT), Namib Naukluft National Park (NNNP) staff members use steel capture cage to eradicate feral cats at Sesriem in the buffer zone. Population numbers has drastically decreased, but with the target being to wholly eradicate the population, progress is slow but positive.
There is a plan to build a nursery, new suitable site still to be identified as the borehole of earmarked site for the nursery has dried up, due to extended drought. Namib Sand Sea does not have its own plant nursery but acquire endemic plant species from Directorate of Forestry and other plant enthusiastic. Currently endemic plant species are planted at Namib Naukluft National Park offices which are in the buffer zone (IUCN Consultation, 2024).
A baseline map of all alien species has been developed for the Namib Naukluft National Park. Systematic and longer term plan of action to effectively control invasive alien species in the Namib-Naukluft Park including initial interventions have been identified (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021). There remains a knowledge gap and a need for a systematic survey and monitoring system to understand ecology of alien plant invasions. For example, there is an indication of Cylindropuntia imbricata cactus infestation. This and other cacti species are pre-adapted to the arid conditions of the Namib biome and may easily establish in the Naukluft part of the park (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021).
There are at least two alien invertebrate plant pests that have infested welwitschia and !nara colonies in the park, two of the iconic endemic species of the park and Namibia - Argentine ants Iridomyrmex humilis and cabbage butterflies Pieris rapae and Pieris brassicae. A control programme for alien invertebrates needs to be developed in consultation with technical specialists to prevent potential negative impact on the indigenous invertebrate fauna associated with these two plant species.
The Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism has enhanced efforts to reduce any potential negative impacts from tourism by providing only limited access to visitors and establishing specific zones within the Kuiseb Valley Managed Resource Use zones of the Namib Naukluft and Dorob National Parks (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021b). Only 4x4 concessionaires can access the greater part of the Namib desert and the Atlantic coastline. Two shuttle concessions have been awarded to operate within the property: one to reduce vehicle numbers entering Sandwich Harbour and another to shuttle between Sossusvlei 2x4 parking and Deadvlei parking.
Other measures include: improving public awareness, for example through improved signage; strengthening enforcement by park management staff; better maintenance of existing designated routes and tracks (fixed road maintenance programme); establish a monitoring programme (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021).
A new office at Sesriem with increased number of staff, improved equipment and tour guide training for staff members ensures more efficient completion of general park duties (IUCN Consultation, 2024). To ensure effective implementation of Nature Conservation Ordinance, 4 of 1975, Namib Naukluft National Park Management Plan and World Heritage Convention, 1972. Semi-skilled workers were employed to support with the demarcation of aesthetic sites with environmentally friendly materials to curb off-road driving and additional pit-latrines were built at Dune 1 (view point), Dune 40, Dune 45, Sossusvlei and at Sandwich Harbour. Sesriem office provides modern visitors toilet block, sanitation problem is thus partly solved.
Litter in the form of plastic and paper are generally carried from the buffer zone into the property by wind. Namib Naukluft National Park personnel as well as Tour Guides from neighbouring lodges remove visible litter from the property. Dumping site at Sesriem has been closed, rubbish collected are transported to Maltahohe landfill. Valuable waste materials are recycled and sell at Maltahohe or Mariental.
Noise pollution from low-flying sight-seeing aircrafts is mostly experienced at Sesriem during take-off and landing. Noise is greatly under control over the property, due to flying height limit.
The current management plan encompasses a Tourism Development Plan which states carrying capacities and affordable access for Namibians, better interpretation and education facilities at Sesriem, improve provision of relevant information materials to increase visitor appreciation, improve waste disposal procedures, better regulation of aerial flying heights and introducing no fly zones and improve training and registration of guides. Tourist control measures are enforced on a high level and during peak seasons other NNNP staff members from Zais and Ganab stations are called in for reinforcement. There is visible decrease in off-road driving (MEFT, 2020). There are no imminent risks that will negatively affect the integrity of the property. The current risks posed are manageable and there are only four dunes allowed by MEFT for tourist utilization: Dune 40, Dune 45, Big Daddy, Big Mamma. New visitor information/regulation sign boards have been erected all over Namib Naukluft National Park, this includes Namib Sand Sea.
The Topnaar community are given a limited hunting quota outside the boundaries of the site for animals that are shot by Ministry staff for distribution among community members. Illegal hunting by community members and other residents along the northern fringe, as well as their visitors, occur sporadically. Hunting of game predominantly Oryx and Zebra within Namib Naukluft Park, supplying game meat to coastal towns of Walvisbay and Swakopmund has been observed following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic (IUCN Consultation, 2020 and 2024). MEFT and police officials patrol and occasionally when they have adequate proof for prosecution through the legal system. After the Corona Virus Disease – 2019 pandemic outbreak Topnaar men have visibly resorted to commercialized illegal hunting of game predominantly Oryx and Zebra within Namib Naukluft National Park, supplying game meat to coastal towns of Walvisbay and Swakopmund. Game numbers has drastically decreased in the northern section of Namib Naukluft National Park due to persistent hunting and prolonged drought (IUCN Consultation, 2024). In order to promote conservation and sustainable natural resource management and socio-economic development the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism developed a Land Use and Development Plan for the Kuiseb Valley Managed Resource Use zones of the Namib Naukluft and Dorob National Parks 2020 – 2029 (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021b) and National Policy on Protected Areas' Neighbours and Resident Communities (Ministry of Environment and Tourism, 2013a,b; Namibia, 2015).
The property predominantly consists of sand dunes and only the coastline is viable for fishing, however fishing within the property is prohibited. The other waterbody found within the property is Sandwich Harbour Ramsar Site, where no fishing is taking place. No aquatic resources are allowed to be harvested at the property, however the shared 4x4 route from Lüderitz to Walvis Bay is a serious problem that affects the use of the park by Namibians and foreign visitors. This 4x4 route is currently marketed as a man against nature contest and appeals primarily to 4x4 enthusiasts, and not necessarily to nature lovers and the typical visitors to national parks and World Heritage Sites all over the world. Coastal fishing has become part of these routes despite recreational fishing not being allowed in the park. The product and marketing need to be redirected to reflect a responsible nature-based adventure tourism product, focussed on appreciation of the landscapes and unique biodiversity, geology, history, the clear night skies, and the essence of the Namib Sand Sea World Heritage Site.
The number of households per settlement varies greatly: each settlement may have between five to 25 residents in up to 15 households (Mortimer, D.J. et al, 2016). The literature review revealed that the Topnaar population living in the Kuiseb valley has fluctuated over the years, which is in part due to the high degree of mobility between Walvis Bay and the settlements along the river (Mortimer, D.J. et al, 2016, Werner, 2003). Also, some people might be registered at a settlement in order to receive drought relief or to keep livestock there while they are residing most of the time in Walvis Bay (Dieckmann, U. et al, 2013). The latest communication from the Office of the Prime Minister indicates that the current estimated number of Topnaar households living along the Lower Kuiseb River is 135, with up to five members per household (IUCN Consultation, 2020).
With the formation of the Topnaar Association in 2021 there is a better coordination mechanism between the Topnaar community and the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism. The association will represent the community and communicate allowable land uses and specific zonations to the community. A formal agreement between the MEFT and the Topnaar Association will formally acknowledge the rights of Park residents in accordance with national policies and Park objectives regarding land rights, settlement rights, natural resource utilisation rights and other livelihood rights (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021b).
The Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism has also engaged with the Ministry of Mines and Energy to prevent the granting of Exclusive Prospecting Licenses (EPLs) and Mining Licenses (MLs) in special value zones and minimum disturbance zones and for industrial minerals. Additionally, no EPLs and MLs are granted in areas already excluded from exploration and mining and current EPL or ML in any such areas or zones are not extended or renewed.
Although there remain no active mining operations within the property, diamond mining has been undertaken in the coastal zone of the NSS periodically since the early 1900s and some abandoned infrastructure remains to this day. The current management plan foresees some rehabilitation measures to remove some of these remnants of mining infrastructure (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021). Notwithstanding that the Langer Heinrich and Husab uranium mines to the north of property are operational, the mines are located far away from the property to an extent that their activities will have no impact on the property (Namibia, 2016; Mining Review Africa, 2009; Jamasmie, 2015). Despite discoveries of uranium on gravel plains north of the property, as well as quarries of dimension stone, the prospects for significant new finds of diamonds, uranium or other minerals within the property are considered limited. In recognition of this, as well as the incompatibility of mining and World Heritage Sites the State Party is cancelling existing EPLs 4323 and 4324, whose renewal by custodian Ministries (Ministry of Mines and Energy and Ministry of Environment and Tourism) was a procedural oversight, and no other EPL’s are currently active (Namibia, 2016).
Overall, the Dorob, Namib Naukluft and Topnaar stakeholder relationship is improving, participatory management is taking shape and co-management approaches to landscapes and biodiversity conservation across different land tenure systems with different land owners or custodians is being explored. Various agreements have been reached between the Ministry of Environment and the traditional authority. These include access to tourism opportunities through the allocation of concessions, an annual wildlife utilization quota, and accepting the need for the Topnaar community to continue their traditional subsistence and lifestyle practices within the context of national development (Management Plan NSS World Heritage Site 2014).
Co-management of natural resources is not new in Namibia - the Greater Sossusvlei-Namib Landscape is managed under a co-management approach whereby there is high-level consensus amongst all stakeholders on developing an overall vision, objectives and targets that will be to the greater good of all stakeholders, achieved through the implementation of an agreed plan. The Strategic Collaborative Management and Development Plan for Greater Sossusvlei – Namib Landscape 2013 – 2018 was the first formal and visionary landscape management instrument that the Ministry at that time supported.
A planned outcome of the current management plan is the establishment of a landscape-level structure such as the Central Namib Conservation Landscape Management Unit in which park neighbours and stakeholders including local authorities, SOEs, conservancies and the private sector participate and are updated of park objectives to ensure that their actions are compatible with the objective of open connected landscapes.
The Land use and development plan for the Kuiseb Valley managed resource use zones of the Namib Naukluft and Dorob National also specifies participatory processes for determining appropriate restrictions on use i.e. via community meetings and only moving forward with decisions once Free, Prior Informed Consent has been received. Mitigation measures to address potential adverse impacts on livelihoods, grievance procedures and ongoing community engagement activities are also addressed in the plan (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021b).
Gobabeb - Namib Research Institute has a good outreach to other regions through the YES programme on the NSS WHS to schools in Erongo, Hardap and //Kharas Regions and has recently launched the CAMP (Climate Action for Millennials Programme) - providing intensive training to young graduates on climate change related topics (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021).
The Management Plan of the NSS which was finalized in 2021 addresses issues such as conservation, research, monitoring, tourism, enforcement, education, traditional practices and cultural heritage within the context and aspirations for national and regional development (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021). The property has a zonation map which illustrates the operational management zones. The Namib Naukluft National Park integrated management plan 2021/2022-2030/2031, was commissioned and published by the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism with funding from the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany through the Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau Development Bank (KfW).
There is no specific budget or dedicated staffing for the NSS, but the Namib Naukluft National Park receives an annual operational budget allocation equivalent to about US$ 850,000 and has a permanent staff of 26. Additional government funds may be allocated for capital expenditure within the park according to specific needs. Although this level of funding is barely adequate for a park of this size, it remains relatively stable and has been increased progressively (IUCN, 2013). According to the budget statement of the Ministry for Environment, Forestry and Tourism 2023/2024 (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2023), there has been an increase in the operational budget by 11% compared to the 2022/23 budget. Although this is noted as still being below the required budget to execute all operational programmes of the Ministry. 212,592,326 Namibian dollars is allocated to wildlife and protected area management. It is unclear how much has been allocated to the Namib-Naukluft National Park exactly.
In the past, visitor guides and tour operators were poorly trained and often ignorant in specific aspects relating to the Namib Desert and the World Heritage Convention and its purpose (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021). However, a key priority recently has been to ensure tour operators are trained to adhere to rules and regulations relating to the management plan and specifically biodiversity conservation and tourist behaviour. The Gobabeb – Namib Research Institute is the main partner organization offering training on the greater Namib Desert Biome and topical sustainable development issues.
In 2016, a law enforcement Training School was built at Waterberg Plateau Park, Namibia to cater for training needs for MEFT staff members as well as other ministries and private organizations that have interest in wildlife protection, particularly keystone species e.g. Rhinos. The school is also available for other training needs for MEFT staff members.
The establishment of a training centre (Escourt/Tsondab training centre) is foreseen in the next few years. The idea is that this should serve as a patrol camp and venue for training and environmental education and as a satellite research station for the Gobabeb Namib Research Institute (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021).
Honorary Conservation Officers are trained and assist park staff to report illegal activities and apprehend offenders.
Further training is envisioned for determining necessary management actions and the collection of consistent monitoring data.
There is a lack of visitor interpretation facilities. The harsh climate of the Namib desert reduces longevity of outdoor signage, however information on Namib Sand Sea is available at Sesriem at the Namib Wildlife Resorts, and a plaque about the NSS World Heritage Site has been placed to the entry to the site. Banners about the site are on the walls of the Headquarters of the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism and are also made available at tourism and public events (Report on the state of conservation NSS World Heritage Site 2015). The current management plan envisions a feasibility assessment for a new visitor interpretation facility to be carried out. The plan also states that it is important to ensure that all infrastructure designs and interpretation designs should follow specific infrastructure and interpretation design criteria so that there is a consistency in design and interpretation. In this regard, the Visibility and Information Dissemination Strategy for Namibia’s National Parks (MEFT, 2020) must be adhered to.
Gobabeb - The Namib Research Institute has initiated improved training of tour guides from the local Topnaar community and some hospitality centres and developed specific outreach programmes like indigenous people, schools and university students to increase knowledge and appreciation of the property (e.g. tour-guide training, training courses on World Heritage Site management). UNESCO and Namibia University of Science and Technology, in conjunction with Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism held training workshops: Tour Guides on tour guiding planning and management for Namib Naukluft National Staff members, Wardens, Rangers and Assistant Rangers (field going personnel). The current management plan also foresees implementing training courses for tour operators so that guides with access to the World Heritage site need to have passed the course to be able to operate within the site.
According to the current management plan (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021) the Topnaar Association will in future be the holder of tourism concessions and the entity to enter into an agreement with MEFT that will provide security of tenure and rights and responsibilities of both parties regarding residence in and management of the park (as well as the relevant part of Dorob NP)
The key objective is to allow for sustainable use of natural resources as a wildlife management strategy in line with the National Policy on Utilization of Game in Protected Areas and Other State Land and the Nature Conservation Ordinance, 1975 (4 of 1975) as amended. This includes quotas for harvesting natural resources within park boundaries. All resource utilization in the park will be done in accordance with the National Policy on Utilization of Game in Protected Areas and other State Land and should be economically and ecologically sustainable. All resource utilization in the Lower Kuiseb Valley Managed Resource Use area will additionally be done in accordance with the agreed land use plan for that area and should be economically and ecologically sustainable. All harvesting must be cost effective and should consider the full costs of managing the resource, including the costs of control, monitoring and effects on the environment. The park may in principle be used as a source of wildlife for introduction to other areas if the relevant populations can sustain any removals.
The indigenous Topnaar community, now living in scattered settlements along the Kuiseb River, has used the land and resources of the NSS for centuries (IUCN, 2013). They are a nomadic people who have traditionally moved to new areas within their forbidding landscape as dictated by changing conditions and resource availability. Today, many of their traditions are being lost, and most of their settlements are occupied by the old and young, as most adults of working age opt for paid employment in nearby centres (Legal Assistance Centre, 2013). The traditional harvesting of !Nara fruit has been transformed into an open access system where everyone is in competition for the fruit due to commercialization, which causes distrust between members of this community and their traditional authority (Legal Assistance Centre, 2013).
Although participatory management arrangements with the Topnaar community have been put in place, the impact of commercialization of !Nara fruit needs to be monitored.
Some monitoring of biophysical and ecological parameters (e.g. rainfall, temperature, humidity, fog, vegetation, invertebrate, mammal and bird populations) has been undertaken at the Gobabeb Training and Research Centre since 1962. However, processing of data to inform management planning and decision making has been sporadic and uncoordinated (NNCWH, 2012). The new agreement between MEFT and the Gobabeb-Namib Research Institute aims to strengthen the collaboration on research and will hopefully also improve the feedback from research into management activities and vice versa (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021). The nomination dossier identifies 23 key indicators for measuring the state of conservation of the property, classified into management, human use, geographical and ecological indicator categories (State Party of Namibia, 2013). Short- and long-datasheets are archived at the Gobabeb-Namib Research Institute which is situated within the area and with its reputation on research and monitoring is ideal host for collating, curating, analysing and disseminating data and information from monitoring (Management Plan NSS World Heritage Site, 2014). Additionally, a specialized Environmental Management Unit will be established to strengthen capacity of park management in the monitoring, implementation and compliance with the Environmental Management Act, Act 7 of 2007. Monitoring framework and annual monitoring reports are being developed along with a long-term programme to monitor the key ecological indicators that affect the state of conservation of the site (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021).
Monitoring of the effectiveness of the management itself is an important component of the existing management plan (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021). The aim is to ensure regular monitoring and data collection feeds into adaptive management and decision-making, using the National Guidelines for Monitoring for Management of Protected Areas in Namibia 2021. Standardised operating systems and procedures like inspection sheets and performance assessments along with the METT assessment are to be used. Park headquarter staff are to annually implement the METT assessment, however no report of such a recent assessment could be found.
The financial and human resources available for management have previously been insufficient to undertake the range of tasks required for effective management. Whilst most of the area is inaccessible and requires no management intervention, a need for additional resources to improve the effectiveness of tourism regulation, community outreach, visitor interpretation, ecological monitoring and alien plant control was identified in the nomination evaluation report for the site (IUCN, 2013). However, the new office, increase in staff numbers, development of an Advisory Committee and the Topnaar Association demonstrate positive developments to improve management effectiveness. Further important frameworks are the Land Use and Development Plan for the Kuiseb Valley Managed Resource Use zones of the Namib Naukluft and Dorob National Parks 2020 – 2029 (Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, 2021b) and the National Policy on Protected Areas' Neighbours and Resident Communities (Ministry of Environment and Tourism, 2013a, b; Namibia, 2015), which provides guidelines on the involvement of neighbours and resident communities in protected area management and benefits thereof, while at the same time recognizing the need to promote biodiversity conservation.
2) Existing functional landscape established, the Greater Sossusvlei-Namib Landscape (GSNL) as an initiative of MEFT and sustained by the private sector establishing the NNNP Consultative Committee involving park neighbours and other stakeholders to enhance cooperation Much of the commercial farmland east of the NNNP is not viable for farming but suitable for wildlife and tourism. Consolidation of such land is taking place already and much of the neighbouring farms are being managed as a private nature reserve (NamibRand Nature Reserve) with the potential for others to form as well, up to and including a part of the escarpment zone. MEFT and GSNL are engaging in joint wildlife monitoring, managing borderlines and existing fencing to ensure optimal landscape connectivity.
3) In 2021, Topnaar Association has been formed: To enable sustainable use of natural resources as a wildlife management strategy in line with the National Policy on Utilization of Game in Protected Areas and Other State Land and the Nature Conservation Ordinance, 1975 (4 of 1975) as amended. All resource utilization in the park will be done in accordance with the National Policy on Utilization of Game in Protected Areas and other State Land and should be economically and ecologically sustainable. All resource utilization in the Lower Kuiseb Valley Managed Resource Use area will additionally be done in accordance with the agreed land use plan for that area and should be economically and ecologically sustainable. All harvesting must be cost effective and should consider the full costs of managing the resource, including the costs of control, monitoring and effects on the environment. The park may in principle be used as a source of wildlife for introduction to other areas if the relevant populations can sustain any removals.
World’s only coastal desert with extensive dune fields influenced by fog
Massive dunes made of sand transported from afar
Diversity of dune formations and natural beauty
Plant and animal adaptations to desert conditions
Rare and endemic species
Nevertheless, temperature has had negative effects on vegetation greenness, indicating warming would reduce plant growth in region. Spatially, 75% of the region showed statistically significant greening over March 2000 to September 2012 and 39.30% for March 2000 to December 2018. The different vegetation trend results between the entire region and the pixel scale implied that location-specific greening could be masked by an overall trend. Precipitation (especially the large episodic precipitation events) and CO2 are dominant drivers of the observed greening in the Namib (Qiao & Wang, 2022).
Additional information
Although statistical information is lacking, tourism particularly at Sesriem and Sossusvlei has shown a tremendous exponential growth (IUCN Consultation, 2024). In support of the influx of tourists a network of approximately 60 tourism lodges on private land outside the property were developed (IUCN 2013).
| № | Organization | Brief description of Active Projects | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gobabeb - Namib Research Institute | Numerous initiatives concerned with fundamental research on desert species, ecological monitoring, weather and climate change, etc. |
https://gobabeb.org/research/gobabeb-meterological-net
|
| 2 | Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, Directorate of Parks and Wildlife | Tracking migrations and movements of large herbivores (Rhino’s) and carnivores (Cheetah and Leopards), camera traps at waterpoints, seasonal strip counts. | |
| 3 | Ministry of Environment & Tourism, Directorate of Scientific Services, Vultures Namibia | Annual counting and ringing at vulture breeding sites | |
| 4 | Ministry of Environment & Tourism, Directorate of Scientific Services | Semiannual monitoring of migratory birds at Sandwich Harbour and nearby Walvis Bay Lagoon (Ramsar site) | |
| 5 | Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism, Directorate of Wildlife and National Parks, Gobabeb- Namib Research Institute | Namib Sand Sea awareness programmes, information products and outreach. This includes the demarcation of aesthetic sites and the installation of aluminium regulation signboards within the NSS and Park overall. | |
| 6 | Gobabeb- Namib Research Institute | Bespoke and multidisciplinary training for tour guides, NSS management staff and emergent Namibian researchers on aspects related to the management and protection of the attributes of the NSS and in particular to spread awareness on the sensitive areas and processes to reduce the footprint in NSS | |
| 7 | Gobabeb - Namib Research Institute | Monitoring of livestock resource utilisation, movement and environmental impacts |
References
| № | References |
|---|---|
| 1 |
Dieckmann, U., Odendaal, W., Tarr, J. & Schreij, A. (2013). Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change in Africa: Report on case studies of Namibia's Topnaar and Hai||om communities. Land, Environment and Development Project Legal Assistance Centre. [online] Legal Assistance Centre. Available at: https://www.eldis.org/document/A65157 [Accessed 24 November 2020].
|
| 2 |
IUCN Consultation (2013). IUCN Confidential Consultation- Namib Sand Sea, Namibia.
|
| 3 |
IUCN Consultation (2020). IUCN Confidential Consultation- Namib Sand Sea, Namibia.
|
| 4 |
IUCN Consultation (2024). IUCN World Heritage Confidential Consultation on the 2020 Outlook site assessment: Namib Sand Sea, Namibia.
|
| 5 |
IUCN. (2013). World Heritage Nomination – IUCN Technical Evaluation, Namib Sand Sea (Namibia). In: IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2013, IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. WHC/13/37.COM. [online] Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/?cid=31&l=en&id_site=1430&am… [Accessed 24 November 2020].
|
| 6 |
Jamasmie, C. (2015). Chinese firm close to start mining uranium in Namibia. [online] 21 February, mining.com. Available at: https://www.mining.com/chinese-firm-close-to-start-mining-u… [Accessed 24 November 2020].
|
| 7 |
Kerby, J. T., Krivak-Tetley, F. E., Shikesho, S. D., & Bolger, D. T. (2022). Livestock impacts on an iconic Namib Desert plant are mediated by abiotic conditions. Oecologia, 199(1), 229-242.
|
| 8 |
Kersten, A., Schnurawa, M., Gebril, N., Voss, J., & Nehls, G. (2024). Desktop Study East Atlantic Flyway. Monitoring of habitats and anthropogenic pressures via remote sensing. Bio Consult SH, 1-58.
|
| 9 |
Mining Review Africa (2009). Positioned in a World class Namibian uranium resource. [online] 6 May, Mining Review Africa. Available at: https://www.miningreview.com/top-stories/positioned-in-a-wo…. [Accessed 24 November 2020].
|
| 10 |
Ministry of Environment and Tourism (2013a). Management Plan for Namib Sand Sea World Heritage site 2013-2018. Republic of Namibia. Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Directorate of Regional Services and Parks Management.
|
| 11 |
Ministry of Environment and Tourism (2013b). National Policy on Protected Areas' Neighbours and Resident Communities. [online] Available at: http://the-eis.com/elibrary/sites/default/files/downloads/l… [Accessed 24 November 2020.
|
| 12 |
Ministry of Environment and Tourism (2013c). Tourism development plan: Namib Naukluft Park 2013/2014 - 2017/2018. Republic of Namibia. Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Directorate of Regional Service and Parks Management.
|
| 13 |
Ministry of Environment and Tourism (2013d). Management Plan: Namib Naukluft Park, September 2013. Republic of Namibia, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Directorate of Regional Services and Park Management.
|
| 14 |
Ministry of Environment and Tourism (2018). National Policy on Prospecting and Mining in Protected Areas. [online] Republic of Namibia: Ministry of Environment and Tourism pp 1-60. Available at: https://www.meft.gov.na/files/downloads/235_MET_Policy%20on… [Accessed 25 October 2024].
|
| 15 |
Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (2021). Management plan for Namib-Naukluft National Park 2021/2022-2030/2031. Republic of Namibia: Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism pp 1-500.
|
| 16 |
Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (2021b). Land use and development plan for the Kuiseb Valley managed resource use zones of the Namib Naukluft and Dorob National Parks 2020-2029. Republic of Namibia: Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism pp 1-95.
|
| 17 |
Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (2022). Annual Report 2021-2022. [online] Republic of Namibia: Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism pp 1-80. Available at: https://www.meft.gov.na/files/downloads/MEFT%20Annual%20Rep… [Accessed 25 October 2024].
|
| 18 |
Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (2023). Budget statement by Hon Pohamba Shifeta, MP Minister of Environment, Forestry and Tourism. [online] Republic of Namibia: Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism pp 1-12. Available at: https://www.parliament.na/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Vote-1… [Accessed 25 October 2024].
|
| 19 |
Mortimer, D. J., Trivino, G. C., Gagnon, J. A., & Iwanicki, S. W. (2016). Creating Tourism Employment Opportunities for the Topnaar in the Namib Sand Sea. Digital WPI [online]. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/895 [Accessed 24 November 2020].
|
| 20 |
Namibian Sun. (2024). Sandwich Harbour concession to address challenges. Namibian Sun by Leandrea Mouers. Published online 3 May 2024. Available at: https://www.namibiansun.com/local-news/sandwich-harbour-con… [Accessed 5 November 2024].
|
| 21 |
Niner, H. J. et al. (2024). Reflections on the past, present, and potential futures of knowledge hierarchies in ocean biodiversity governance research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 11( 2024), 1347494.
|
| 22 |
Qiao, N., & Wang, L. (2022). Satellite observed vegetation dynamics and drivers in the Namib sand sea over the recent 20 years. Ecohydrology, 15(3), e2420.
|
| 23 |
Republic of Namibia (2021). Revised National Strategy on Wildlife Protection and Law Enforcement 2021 – 2025. [online] Republic of Namibia: Ministry of Environment and Tourism pp 1-60. Available at: https://www.meft.gov.na/files/downloads/072_National-Strate… [Accessed 25 October 2024].
|
| 24 |
Rohde, R.F., Hoffman, M.T., Durbach, I., Venter, Z. & Jack, S. (2019). Vegetation and climate change in the Pro-Namib and Namib Desert based on repeat photography: Insights into climate trends. J. Arid. Env. 165: 119-131
|
| 25 |
State Party of Namibia (2013). Nomination of Namib Sand Sea as a World Heritage Site. [online] Windhoek, Namibia: Namibia National Committee for World Heritage, pp.1-1037. Available at: < https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1430/documents/ > [Accessed 25 October 2024].
|
| 26 |
World Heritage Committee. (2013). Decision 37 COM 8B.8, Namib Sand Sea. In: Report of decisions of the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee (Phnom Penh, 2013). [online] Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5124 [Accessed 24 November 2020].
|